Pitavastatin 4 mg vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in HIV Dyslipidemia: Post- Hoc Analysis of the INTREPID Trial Based on the Independent CHD Risk Factor for Age

Similar documents
Supplemental Table S2: Subgroup analysis for IL-6 with BMI in 3 groups

2.0 Synopsis. Choline fenofibrate capsules (ABT-335) M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/772. (For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug:

Update on Dyslipidemia and Recent Data on Treating the Statin Intolerant Patient

BHIVA Workshop: When to Start. Dr Chloe Orkin Dr Laura Waters

The results of the ARTEN study. Vicente Soriano Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Effect of the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab on Cardiovascular Outcomes

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Safety of Anacetrapib in Patients with or

Dyslipidemia and HIV NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of 150 mg Q2W Dose of the PCSK9 mab REGN727/SAR236553: Data from Three Phase 2 Studies

Alirocumab Treatment Effect Did Not Differ Between Patients With and Without Low HDL-C or High Triglyceride Levels in Phase 3 trials

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

Learning Objectives. Patient Case

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

The ACCELERATE Trial

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

I5 TH KAP ANNUAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROGRAMME Kisumu, Kenya

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424136

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424138

4 th and Goal To Go How Low Should We Go? :

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

Lipid Panel Management Refresher Course for the Family Physician

(For National Authority Use Only) Name of Study Drug: to Part of Dossier:

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Simvastatin With or Without Ezetimibe in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Supplementary Online Content

Diabetes Mellitus: A Cardiovascular Disease

Sponsor Novartis. Generic Drug Name Fluvastatin. Therapeutic Area of Trial Dyslipidemia

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular outcomes?

Eyes on Korean Data: Lipid Management in Korean DM Patients

Tailored Statin Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes. Han, Ki Hoon Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan

Abstract PS8/2. Double-blind treatment phase D/C/F/TAF. + matching D/C + F/TDF placebo D/C/F/TAF. D/C + F/TDF + matching D/C/F/TAF placebo

STATIN UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

Investigating the effect of antiretroviral switch to tenofovir alafenamide on lipid profiles in people living with HIV within the UCD ID Cohort

There are many ways to lower triglycerides in humans: Which are the most relevant for pancreatitis and for CV risk?

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

Cardiovascular Complications of HIV and Its Treatment

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Tesamorelin Clinical Data Overview Jean-Claude Mamputu, PhD Senior Medical Advisor, Theratechnologies

MS Sabatine, RP Giugliano, AC Keech, PS Sever, SA Murphy and TR Pedersen, for the FOURIER Steering Committee & Investigators

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

Update On Diabetic Dyslipidemia: Who Should Be Treated With A Fibrate After ACCORD-LIPID?

Comparison of Original and Generic Atorvastatin for the Treatment of Moderate Dyslipidemic Patients

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Cer=fied Adult Nurse Prac==oner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

Highlights of the new blood pressure and cholesterol guidelines: A whole new philosophy. Jeremy L. Johnson, PharmD, BCACP, CDE, BC-ADM

How would you manage Ms. Gold

2013 Cholesterol Guidelines. Anna Broz MSN, RN, CNP, AACC Adult Certified Nurse Practitioner North Ohio Heart, Inc.

No relevant financial relationships

Situación actual de los pacientes VIH+ Esteban Martínez Hospital Clínic Barcelona

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

Lifetime clinical and economic benefits of statin-based LDL lowering in the 20-year Followup of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Statin Use and Cardiovascular Disease in HIV

Management of LDL as a Risk Factor. Raul D. Santos MD, PhD Heart Institute-InCor University of Sao Paulo Brazil

The Metabolic Syndrome: Is It A Valid Concept? YES

DYSLIPIDEMIA TREATMENT: HYBRIDIZING CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES

Update on CVD and Microvascular Complications in T2D

Preventing Myocardial Infarction in the Young Adult in the First Place: How Do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III Guidelines Perform?

Fasting or non fasting?

Case Presentation. Rafael Bitzur The Bert W Strassburger Lipid Center Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer

Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials

Macrovascular Residual Risk. What risk remains after LDL-C management and intensive therapy?

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Achieving Very Low LDL-C Levels With the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in the FOURIER Outcomes Trial

ART Treatment. ART Treatment

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

2016 ESC/EAS Guideline in Dyslipidemias: Impact on Treatment& Clinical Practice

Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

Lessons from Recent Atherosclerosis Trials

Disclosure. This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc. All authors are employees of Pfizer, Inc. with ownership of stock in Pfizer, Inc.

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Metabolic Syndrome Update The Metabolic Syndrome: Overview. Global Cardiometabolic Risk

Novel HDL Targeted Therapies: The Search Continues Assoc. Prof. K.Kostner,, Univ. of Qld, Brisbane

No relevant financial relationships

Dolutegravir-Rilpivirine (Juluca)

Soo LIM, MD, PHD Internal Medicine Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

C Orkin, 1 G Moyle, 2 M Fisher, 3 H Wang, 4 J Ewan 4 and ROCKET I Study Group. Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK;

CETP inhibition: pros and cons. Philip Barter The Heart Research Institute Sydney, Australia

Cedars Sinai Diabetes. Michael A. Weber

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

How to Reduce CVD Complications in Diabetes?

Conflicts of interest. What's the Skinny on the Lipid Guidelines? Key Differences. Are you applying the new ACC/AHA Lipid guidelines in your practice?

Heart Disease in the HIV + Person

Hyperlipidemia. Intern Immersion Block 2015

PCSK9 Agents Drug Class Prior Authorization Protocol

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

UPDATE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DYSLIPIDEMIA 2013 RESDISUAL CV RISK AND SUBOPTIMAL LDL-C REDUCTION BEYOND STATINS J. Antonio G.

AMR101, a Pure-EPA Omega-3 Fatty Acid, Lowers Triglycerides in Patients with Very High Triglycerides Without Raising LDL- C: The MARINE Study

Managing Dyslipidemia in Disclosures. Learning Objectives 03/05/2018. Speaker Disclosures

Changing lipid-lowering guidelines: whom to treat and how low to go

BHIVA Best of CROI Feedback Meetings. London Birmingham North West England Cardiff Gateshead Edinburgh

Heart Online First, published on March 29, 2005 as /hrt SCIENTIFIC LETTER

Drug Class Review HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) and Fixed-dose Combination Products Containing a Statin

LAMIS (Livalo in AMI Study)

CVD Prevention, Who to Consider

Prevention of Heart Disease: The New Guidelines

Ischemic Cardiovascular Disease in Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection

Transcription:

Pitavastatin 4 mg vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in HIV Dyslipidemia: Post- Hoc Analysis of the INTREPID Trial Based on the Independent CHD Risk Factor for Age Craig A. Sponseller, Masaya Tanahashi, Hideki Suganami, Vladimir A. Kryzhanovski, Judith A. Aberg

Disclosures Craig A. Sponseller, MD employee of Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. Masaya Tanahashi - employee of Kowa Company, LTD, Japan Hideki Suganami - employee of Kowa Company, LTD, Japan Vladimir A. Kryzhanovski, MD, PhD employee of Eli Lilly and Company Judith A. Aberg, MD (New York University School of Medicine) INTREPID study design consultant and study investigator

Buchacz K, et al. Antivir Ther 2013;18:65-75; Esser S, et al. Clin Res Cardiol 2013;102:203-13; Freiberg MS, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:614-22; Triant VA. Et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2506-12; www.aoa.gov (24 Oct 2013). Introduction Dyslipidemia, an established cardiovascular (CV) disease risk factor, is seen in 81% of men (median age 47 yrs) and 67% of women (median age 45 yrs) with HIV infection in the US. (Buchacz 2013) Advances in antiretroviral therapy (ART) continue to extend the lifespans HIV-infected individuals. By 2015, an estimated 50% of people with HIV in the US will be >50 years of age. (www.aoa.gov) CHD in aging HIV-infected population is an increasing medical challenge. Based on 10-year CHD risk, increase in cardiac events is expected in aging HIV-infected subjects in the next decades ( 45 years/<45 years 16.4% vs. 4.2 %, p<0.001).(esser 2013) There is an estimated 50-75% increased relative risk for acute myocardial infarction (MI) in HIV-infected individuals. (Freiberg 2013, Triant 2007)

NCEP ATP III Major Independent Risk Factors for CHD Cigarette smoking Hypertension (BP 140/90 mmhg or on antihypertensive medication) Low HDL-C (<40 mg/dl) (HDL cholesterol 60 mg/dl = negative risk factor; its presence allows for subtraction of one risk factor from the count.) Family history of premature CHD (CHD in male first degree relative <55 years; CHD in female first degree relative <65 years) Age: men 45 yrs; women 55 yrs Circulation 2002;106:3143-421.

Age and Risk Age: a major independent risk factor for CHD; non-modifiable (men 45 yrs; women 55 yrs) Risk of acute MI increases significantly with age HIV population vs. non-hiv population Rates of acute MI per 1000 person-yrs (95% CI): (Freiberg 2013) 40-49 yrs: 2.0 (1.6-2.4) vs. 1.5 (1.3-1.7); P<0.05 50-59 yrs: 3.9 (3.3-4.5) vs. 2.2 (1.9-2.5); P<0.05 60-69 yrs: 5.0 (3.8-6.7) vs. 3.3 (2.6-4.2); P<0.05 Freiberg MS, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:614-22.

Study Design INTREPID = HIV-Infected Patients and Treatment with Pitavastatin vs. Pravastatin for Dyslipidemia 4-Week Washout/Dietary Lead-in Randomization Pitavastatin 4 mg once daily n=126 Pravastatin 40 mg once daily n=126 Phase 4, double-blind, double-dummy, 12-week superiority study (followed by a 40-week, double-blind, safety extension study) Randomization 1:1, stratified by presence/absence of viral hepatitis B/C

Eligibility Criteria Subjects: HIV-infected adults (18-70 yrs) with dyslipidemia Stable ART x 6 months HIV-1 RNA viral load <200 copies/ml and CD4 count >200 cells/µl for 3 months Fasting serum LDL-C 130-220 mg/dl and triglycerides 400 mg/dl after 4-wk washout/dietary stabilization period

Endpoints Primary endpoint: Superiority based on mean % change in fasting serum LDL-C from Baseline to Week 12 Secondary endpoints: Changes in other lipid parameters (fasting serum Apo B, non-hdl-c, HDL-C, triglycerides) Post-hoc Analysis - Age-based evaluation of primary and secondary endpoints Efficacy analyses included only patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had a least 1 on-treatment lipid assessment.

Baseline Characteristics * Pitavastatin 4 mg n=126 Pravastatin 40 mg n=126 Age, mean (SD), yrs 50.1 (7.5) 49.2 (8.7) Males, n (%) 106 (84.1) 111 (88.1) Race, n (%) Caucasian 107 (84.9) 96 (76.2) African-American 16 (12.7) 23 (18.3) Other 3 (2.4) 7 (5.6) Body Mass Index, mean (SD), kg/m 2 27.2 (4.5) 28.2 (4.9) * Safety population

Baseline Characteristics * 10-year CHD Risk, n (%) Pitavastatin 4 mg n=126 Pravastatin 40 mg n=126 >20% 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 10-20% 32 (25.4) 30 (23.8) <10% 93 (73.8) 95 (75.4) HIV-1 RNA viral load, mean (SD), log copies 1.2 (0.3) 1.1 (0.2) CD4 cell count, mean (SD), cells/mm 3 648.5 (246.8) 563.7 (211.3) * Safety population

Patient Demographics: Age Number of patients 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg 49 50 51 49 14 12 8 9 5 0 <30 30-<40 40-<50 50-<60 60 Age, yrs Approximately 50% of the INTREPID population was 50 yrs

Mean % Change Baseline to Week 12: Primary Study Population 0 LDL-C Apo B Non-HDL-C -5 M e a n % C h a n g e -10-15 -20-25 -20.9-23.3-16.5-18.7-30 -35-31.1 P <0.001 Pitavastatin 4 mg n=121 P <0.001 Pravastatin 40 mg n=126 P-values for between-treatment comparisons based on LS mean % change. -26.9 P <0.001

Mean % Change Baseline to Week 12 0 LDL-C <50 yrs 50 yrs Apo B <50 yrs 50 yrs Non-HDL-C <50 yrs 50 yrs -5 M e a n % C h a n g e -10-15 -20-25 -22.1-19.7-17.2-22.9-15.9-23.6-19.1-18.2-30 -35-29.7 P=0.017-32.3 P<0.001 P=0.010 P=0.001 Pitavastatin 4 mg -26.5-27.2 P=0.008 P=0.001 Pravastatin 40 mg P-values for between-treatment comparisons based on LS mean % change.

Patient Demographics: Sex and Age Number of patients 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 20 Pitavastatin 4 mg 82 82 29 Pravastatin 40 mg <45 45 <55 55 Male, Age (yrs) Female, Age (yrs) n=213 n=34 13 9 6 6 71% of the population had age as a major independent risk factor for CHD

Mean Baseline Lipid Measurements Pitavastatin 4 mg N=121 LDL-C, mg/dl n n Pravastatin 40 mg N=126 Male <45 yrs 20 154.4 29 158.0 Male 45 yrs 82 153.2 82 154.1 Female <55 yrs 13 164.2 9 150.1 Female 55 yrs 6 163.7 6 151.2

Mean Baseline Lipid Measurements Apo B, mg/dl Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg Male <45 yrs 124.8 129.7 Male 45 yrs 122.5 126.7 Female <55 yrs 125.8 132.2 Female 55 yrs 136.2 122.5 Non-HDL-C, mg/dl Male <45 yrs 187.4 196.1 Male 45 yrs 186.9 187.3 Female <55 yrs 197.8 187.0 Female 55 yrs 199.7 181.0

Mean Baseline Lipid Measurements HDL-C, mg/dl Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg Male <45 yrs 52.4 47.2 Male 45 yrs 46.9 48.7 Female <55 yrs 58.9 53.8 Female 55 yrs 57.0 57.3 Triglycerides, mg/dl Male <45 yrs 169.2 187.4 Male 45 yrs 173.8 165.8 Female <55 yrs 182.2 199.6 Female 55 yrs 179.7 148.8

LDL-C: Change from Baseline to Week 12 LS Mean % Change from Baseline Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg Difference in LS Mean % Change Pitavastatin better Pravastatin better LDL-C Male <45 yrs -26.4 * -19.2 * Male 45 yrs -29.4 * -17.9 * Female <55 yrs -25.2 * -12.1-11.4, P<0.001-13.1, P=0.073 Female 55 yrs -24.1 * -11.3-12.9, P=0.203-7.2, P=0.161-16.0-12.0-8.0-4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 Percent * P 0.01 P>0.05

Apo B and Non-HDL-C: Change from Baseline to Week 12 LS Mean % Change from Baseline Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg Difference in LS Mean % Change Pitavastatin better Pravastatin better Apo B Male <45 yrs -22.2 * -15.5 * -6.7, P=0.102 Male 45 yrs -22.7 * -14.9 * -7.8, P<0.001 Female <55 yrs -20.3 * -13.3 * -7.0, P=0.232 Female 55 yrs -16.7 * -12.3-4.3, P=0.592 Non-HDL-C Male <45 yrs Male 45 yrs Female <55 yrs Female 55 yrs -24.0 * -18.2 * -24.0 * -15.6 * -21.5 * -11.1-23.5 * -9.6-5.9, P=0.204-8.5, P<0.001-10.4, P=0.110-13.9, P=0.127-16.0-12.0-8.0-4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 Percent * P 0.01 P>0.05

HDL-C and Triglycerides: Change from Baseline to Week 12 LS Mean % Change from Baseline Pitavastatin 4 mg Pravastatin 40 mg Difference in LS Mean % Change Pitavastatin better Pravastatin better HDL-C Male <45 yrs 5.3 5.9 Male 45 yrs 0.8 1.7 Female <55 yrs 5.6 10.7 0.6, P=0.887 0.9, P=0.697 5.0, P=0.429 Female 55 yrs 1.5 7.3 5.8, P=0.509 Triglycerides Male <45 yrs Male 45 yrs Female <55 yrs Female 55 yrs -9.1-7.1 4.4 1.8 0.8-12.9-18.7-4.8-2.0, P=0.890-13.9, P=0.624 2.5, P=0.738 13.7, P=0.504 P>0.05-16.0-12.0-8.0-4.0 0.0 4.0 8.0 12.0 16.0 Percent

HIV-1 RNA Viral Load and CD4 Cell Count: Change from Baseline to Week 12 Parameter n Pitavastatin 4 mg Mean Δ from Baseline (SD) n Pravastatin 40 mg Mean Δ from Baseline (SD) P-Value HIV-1 RNA viral load, log copies 107-0.02 (0.3) 112 0.08 (0.4) 0.06 CD4 count, cells/mm 3 110-8.9 (154.9) 110 13.6 (120.6) 0.29 P-values from ANCOVA model of mean % change from baseline.

Safety Outcomes * Pitavastatin 4 mg N=126 Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) n (%) Pravastatin 40 mg N=126 Any TEAE 77 (61.1) 79 (62.7) Any drug-related TEAE 14 (11.1) 12 (9.5) Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders Arthralgia 3 (2.4) 4 (3.2) Myalgia 1 (0.8) 3 (2.4) Back pain 1 (0.8) 2 (1.6) Pain in extremity 2 (1.6) 3 (2.4) * Safety population

Safety Outcomes * Laboratory Enzymes Pitavastatin 4 mg N=126 n (%) Pravastatin 40 mg N=126 ALT >2 x ULN 4 (3.2) 3 (2.4) AST >2 x ULN 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) CK >5 x ULN 2 (1.6) 0 (0.0) Virologic Status Virologic failure 3 (2.4) 4 (3.2) * Safety population Virologic failure: defined as HIV-1 RNA viral load >200 copies/ml and a >0.3 log increase from baseline.

Summary INTREPID population: 86% male; 71% had age as a major independent risk factor for CHD. In the male subgroups, age 45, <45: Atherogenic lipid factors (LDL-C, Apo B, and non-hdl-c) were significantly reduced for both pitavastatin 4 mg and pravastatin 40 mg. Pitavastatin 4 mg reduced these parameters significantly more than pravastatin 40 mg in males 45 yrs, an independent risk factor for CHD. In the female subgroups: Pitavastatin 4 mg showed statistically significant reductions in atherogenic lipids/lipoproteins LDL-C, Apo B, and non-hdl-c in females <55 and 55 yrs. Pravastatin 40 mg showed a statistically significant reductions only in Apo B in females <55 yrs. No between-treatment differences in lipid parameters, likely due to small samples sizes. There were no between-treatment differences in HDL-C or triglycerides in either the male or female subgroups.

Conclusions Pitavastatin 4 mg demonstrated a superior reduction in LDL-C compared with pravastatin 40 mg in HIV-infected adults with dyslipidemia in the overall study population. Pitavastatin 4 mg significantly reduced atherogenic lipid parameters (LDL-C, Apo B, and non-hdl-c) in men age 45 yrs and women age 55 yrs. Pitavastatin 4 mg demonstrated significantly greater reductions in LDL-C, Apo B, and non-hdl-c vs. pravastatin 40 mg in men with the major independent risk factor for age 45 yrs. The overall adverse event profiles appeared similar between treatment arms.