Mupirocin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th July 2010

Similar documents
Cefotaxime Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Cefuroxime iv Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Vancomycin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version June 2010

Voriconazole Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version March 2010

Micafungin and Candida spp. Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Version February 2013

Consultation on the Revision of Carbapenem Breakpoints

The CLSI Approach to Setting Breakpoints

(and breakpoint table, MIC and. by author. ESCMID Online Lecture Library. conventions) ECCMID 2011, Milan

Doripenem: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Paul M. Tulkens, MD, PhD Françoise Van Bambeke, PharmD, PhD

What is new in EUCAST South Africa, May, Gunnar Kahlmeter EUCAST Technical Data Coordinator and Webmaster Sweden

EUCAST breakpoints. Paul M. Tulkens. Representative of ISC to EUCAST ( ) Member of the EUCAST steering committee ( )

Steven D. Brown* and Maria M. Traczewski. The Clinical Microbiology Institute, 9725 SW Commerce Circle, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Received 30 March 2005; returned 16 June 2005; revised 8 September 2005; accepted 12 September 2005

Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Blood and CSF Culture Isolates At NHLS Academic Laboratories (2005)

breakpoints, cephalosporins, CLSI, Enterobacteriacae, EUCAST, review Clin Microbiol Infect 2008; 14 (Suppl. 1):

Resistance to linezolid in enterococci and staphylococci referred to the national reference laboratory

EUCAST Frequently Asked Questions. by author. Rafael Cantón Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain EUCAST Clinical Data Coordinator

Why some tests are no longer recommended

CHMP extension of indication variation assessment report

Cubicin (Daptomycin) Priv.Doz. Dr. med. Markus Rothenburger

Resistance to new anti-grampositive. Roland Leclercq, Microbiology, CHU Cote de Nacre, Caen, France

Comparison of Omadacycline and Tigecycline Pharmacodynamics in the Plasma, Epithelial Lining Fluid, and Alveolar Macrophages in Healthy Subjects

Methods for colistin testing What works and what does not? Erika Matuschek, Ph D EUCAST Development Laboratory, EDL

ZINEX. Composition Each tablet contains Cefuroxime (as axetil) 250 or 500 mg

Spectrum of vancomycin and susceptibility testing

%T MIC MIC. Pharmacokinetics PK: Cmax AUC T1/2 Pharmacodynamics PD: MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration time-killing-curve 1990.

BACTERIOLOGY PROGRAMME AND PLAN OF TEACHING 3 rd Semester (academic year )

Methods for AST: diffusion or dilution? (pro s en con s)

Discussion points CLSI M100 S19 Update. #1 format of tables has changed. #2 non susceptible category

Healthcare-associated infections acquired in intensive care units

Macrolides & Ketolides. Objectives. Protein Synthesis

Expert rules in antimicrobial susceptibility testing: State of the art

Estimation of In Vitro Susceptibility Breakpoints for Tigecycline Against Staphylococcus aureus

ResFinder 4.0: towards in silico antibiograms

SCMID Online Lecture Library. by author. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in the elderly. Dose Finding - The Past

Summary of Product Characteristics

Normal Human Flora. (Human Microbiome) Dr.Sarmad M.H. Zeiny Baghdad College of Medicine

MERREM IV. meropenem PRODUCT INFORMATION COOH CH 3

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Product opportunity assessment for the development of vaccines against pathogens with high levels of antimicrobial resistance

PRODUCT INFORMATION. Meropenem Kabi powder for intravenous injection or infusion 500 mg 1 g

Supplemental Digital Content

MRSA Micro Scan Pos Combo 6J DADE BEHRING VCM

CHMP List of questions

For the use only of Registered Medical Practitioners or a Hospital or a Laboratory CEFTUM TABLETS. Cefuroxime Axetil Tablets IP 125/250/500mg

Summary of Product Characteristics

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Telavancin Compared with the Other Glycopeptides

Use of linezolid susceptibility test results as a surrogate for the susceptibility of Gram-positive pathogens to tedizolid, a novel oxazolidinone

HUSRES Annual Report 2009 Martti Vaara

CEFPROZIL FOR ORAL SUSPENSION USP 125 mg/5 ml and 250 mg/5 ml. Rx Only

CEFPROZIL FOR ORAL SUSPENSION USP 125 mg/5 ml and 250 mg/5 ml. Rx only

KOMAR UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (KUST) Medical Bacteriology Syllabus (Theory) Spring 2016

Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CLINICAL USE OF GLYCOPEPTIDES. Herbert Spapen Intensive Care Department University Hospital Vrije Universiteit Brussel

NEW ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS IN 2003 : SPECTRUM AND INDICATIONS. 20th Symposium (spring 2003) Thursday May 22nd 2003

Anti-Microbial Drugs

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections in Scottish Intensive Care Units

SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Laboratory CLSI M100-S18 update. Paul D. Fey, Ph.D. Associate Professor/Associate Director Josh Rowland, M.T. (ASCP) State Training Coordinator

Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infection diagnosis and severity stratification

NOVACEF Tablets (Cefuroxime axetil)

University of Alberta Hospital Antibiogram for 2007 and 2008 Division of Medical Microbiology Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology

A Snapshot of Colistin Use in South-East Europe and Particularly in Greece

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Basic Concepts of PK/PD -pharmacodynamic indices- Johan W. Mouton MD PhD FIDSA Professor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodymamics

NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Doribax 500 mg powder for solution for infusion

AXITAB-CV TAB. COMPOSITION :

Development of C sporins. Beta-lactam antibiotics - Cephalosporins. Second generation C sporins. Targets - PBP s

Surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections in Scottish Intensive Care Units

Resurgence of older oral therapies in OPAT: options for OPAT sparing

LINEZOLID APOTEX Tablets. (S)-N-[[3-[3-Fluoro-4-(4-morpholinyl)phenyl]-2-oxo-5-oxazolidinyl]methyl]- acetamide

Surveillance of Healthcare Associated Infections in Scottish Intensive Care Units

Continuous Infusion of Antibiotics In The ICU: What Is Proven? Professor of Medicine Vice-Chairman, Department of Medicine SUNY at Stony Brook

WHO initiatives to build global AMR surveillance capacity

Overview of Tigecycline and Its Role in the Era of Antibiotic Resistance

Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on Azithromycin activity.

Aerobic gram-positive microorganisms Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pneumonia, Streptococcus pyogenes

Pharmacologyonline 1: (2010) ewsletter Singh and Kochbar. Optimizing Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamics Principles & Role of

Streptococci facultative anaerobe

Environmental Monitoring, risk assessment and responsibilities

M E D I C A L L A B O R A T O R Y

DIVISION OF ANTIINFECTIVE DRUG PRODUCTS (HFD-520) CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEW NDA Date review completed: 15 Jun 05

12/12/2011. Atypical Pneumonia. Objectives. Causative Agents of Acute Pneumonia Bacteria. Causative Agents of Acute Pneumonia Other Agents

Achieving pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets of β-lactams in critically ill patients at first dose: Can we do it with standard dosing?

Cell counting (EtBr) Before cell-lysis. Cell-lysis by 3% SDS beads beating. After cell-lysis

Ceftomax TM S (Cefoperazone Sodium plus Sulbactam Sodium Injection)

Reporting blood culture results to clinicians: MIC, resistance mechanisms, both?

INTRODUCTION TO UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASES

Issued by: LABORATORY MANAGER Original Date: June 18, 2001 Approved by: Laboratory Director RESIDENT OBJECTIVES AT MSH

CRIFOS 4 GM Injection (Fosfomycin sodium)

Mesporin TM. Ceftriaxone sodium. Rapid onset, sustained action, for a broad spectrum of infections

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) S urveillance Report 2008 Background Methods

Antimicrobial Activity and Spectrum of PPI-0903M (T-91825), a Novel Cephalosporin, Tested against a Worldwide Collection of Clinical Strains

Beta-lactamase production should have no effect on Azithromycin activity.

Towards clinical Applications of PK-PD in specific situations

Paul M. Tulkens Françoise Van Bambeke. Unité de pharmacologie cellulaire et moléculaire & Louvain Drug Research Institute

2018 CNISP HAI Surveillance Case definitions

National Institute for Communicable Diseases -- Weekly Surveillance Report --

Antifungal Pharmacodynamics A Strategy to Optimize Efficacy

Transcription:

Mupirocin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 6 th July 2010 Foreword EUCAST The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) is organised by the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and the active national antimicrobial breakpoint committees in Europe. EUCAST was established by ESCMID in 1997, was restructured in 2001-2002 and has been in operation in its current form since 2002. The current remit of EUCAST is to harmonise clinical breakpoints for existing drugs in Europe, to determine clinical breakpoints for new drugs, to set epidemiological (microbiological) breakpoints, to revise breakpoints as required, to harmonise methodology for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, to develop a website with MIC and zone diameter distributions of antimicrobial agents for a wide range of organisms and to liaise with European governmental agencies and European networks involved with antimicrobial resistance and resistance surveillance. Information on EUCAST and EUCAST breakpoints is available on the EUCAST website at http://www.eucast.org. EUCAST rationale documents EUCAST rationale documents summarise the information on which the EUCAST clinical breakpoints are based. Availability of EUCAST document All EUCAST documents are freely available from the EUCAST website at http://www.eucast.org. Citation of EUCAST documents This rationale document should be cited as: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Mupirocin: Rationale for the clinical breakpoints, version 1.0, 2010. http://www.eucast.org. Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 1 of 10

Introduction Mupirocin (pseudomonic acid A) is a fermentation product of Pseudomonas fluorescens. It has in vitro activity against staphylococci, aerobic streptococci, Enterococcus faecium (not Enterococcus faecalis), Neisseria spp. and Haemophilus influenzae. Mupirocin is slowly bacterical and inhibits protein synthesis by irreversible binding to isoleucyl t-rna synthetase. Resistance may be mediated by two mechanisms. Mutation of the chromosomal mupa gene confers a low-level resistance (MIC 8-256 mg/l). A plasmid-mediated version of the mupa gene confers high level resistance (MIC >256 mg/l). Mupirocin is mainly used for nasal decolonization of Staphylococcus aureus, particularly MRSA, as part of decolonization regimens. Mupirocin may also be used for topical treatment of uncomplicated skin infections such as impetigo, although prolonged use is associated with selection of resistance. EUCAST breakpoints are related particularly to nasal decolonization of S. aureus. 1. Dosage BSAC CA-SFM CRG DIN NWGA SRGA Most common dose Nasal application 3x daily for 5 d Nasal application 3x daily for 5 d Nasal application 3x daily for 5 d Nasal application 3x daily for 5-10 d Nasal application 3x daily for 5 d Maximum dose schedule Available formulations Topical Topical Topical Topical Topical Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 2 of 10

2. MIC distributions and epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values 0.002 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.032 0.064 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 ECOFF Staphylococcus aureus 0 0 0 4 13 473 3704 3758 490 77 48 44 81 190 86 34 55 24 428 1 Staphylococcus aureus MRSA 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 95 14 10 6 0 14 15 11 0 0 0 32 1 Staphylococcus aureus MSSA 0 0 0 0 0 5 17 74 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Staphylococcus coagulase negative MRSCN 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 49 21 5 1 1 1 1 8 0 0 3 36 ND Staphylococcus lugdunensis 0 0 0 0 6 25 60 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ND Streptococcus agalactiae 0 0 0 0 0 6 25 55 402 514 35 11 5 8 2 2 3 3 0 ND Streptococcus pyogenes 0 0 0 0 35 870 1327 303 139 26 11 11 8 0 5 2 25 2 7 0.5 The table includes MIC distributions available at the time breakpoints were set. They represent combined distributions from multiple sources and time periods. The distributions are used to define the epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFF) and give an indication of the MICs for organisms with acquired or mutational resistance mechanisms. They should not be used to infer resistance rates. When there is insufficient evidence no epidemiological cut-off has been determined (ND). Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 3 of 10

3. Breakpoints prior to harmonisation (mg/l) S< R> BSAC CA-SFM CRG DIN NWGA SRGA CLSI General breakpoints 2/2 Species-related breakpoints Enterobacteriaceae Pseudomonas spp. Acinetobacter spp. Staphylococcus spp. 4/256 2/2 4/256 4/4 S. aureus 4/256 256/256 Streptococcus spp. Streptococcus pneumoniae Enterococcus spp. Haemophilus influenzae Moraxella catarrhalis Corynebacteria Neisseria meningitidis Neisseria gonorrhoeae Pasteurella multocida Anaerobes, Gram-positive Anaerobes, Gram-negative Campylobacter spp. Helicobacter pylori Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 4 of 10

4. Pharmacokinetics Dosage (mg) Cmax (mg/l) Cmin (mg/l) Total body clearance (L/h) T ½ (h), mean (range) AUC24h (mg.h/l) Fraction unbound (%) Volume of distribution (L/kG) Comments No pharmacokinetics available for topical use References Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 5 of 10

5. Pharmacodynamics fauc/mic for bacteriostasis fauc/mic for 2 log reduction fauc/mic from clinical data Comments No pharmacodynamics available for topical use References Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 6 of 10

6. Monte Carlo simulations and Pk/Pd breakpoints No data. Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 7 of 10

7. Clinical data Clinical studies indicate that topical mupirocin treatment is effective in nasal decolonization of wild type Staphylococcus aureus (Perl et al, N Eng J Med 2002; 346: 1871-7; Konvalinka et al, J Hosp Infect 2006; 64: 162-8; Doebbeling et al, Clin Infect Dis 1993; 17: 466-74; Hansen et al, Infection 2007; 35: 260-4). Low-level resistant isolates are initially cleared as effectively as wild type isolates but recolonization, probably due to endogenous relapse, is very common (Walker et al, Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003; 24: 342-6; Harbarth et al, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 1412-16). Clearance rates for high-level resistant isolates are low. There is no evidence on outcome for isolates with MICs above the wild type (ECOFF 1 mg/l) but without a recognised resistance mechanism (MIC 4 mg/l). Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 8 of 10

8. Clinical breakpoints Non-species-related breakpoints There is insufficient evidence to set non-species-related breakpoints. Species-related breakpoints Breakpoints were based on microbiological data (ECOFFs) and clinical experience. For Staphylococcus aureus the breakpoints are 1/256 mg/l. Wild type isolates will be reported susceptible, low-level resistant isolates intermediate and high-level resistant isolates resistant. Isolates with MICs above the wild type (ECOFF 1 mg/l) but without a recognised resistance mechanism (MIC 4 mg/l) will be reported intermediate. Species without breakpoints Organisms other than S. aureus are not targets for mupirocin topical nasal therapy and for that reason did not receive breakpoints. Clinical qualifications Topical nasal treatment with mupirocin is used as part of a decontamination regimen. Dosage Breakpoints apply to topical nasal administration x 3/day. Additional comment Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 9 of 10

9. Mupirocin - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints These can be found at http://www.eucast.org 10. Exceptions noted for individual national committees None Mupirocin: Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 1.0 Page 10 of 10