The Wildland Fire Chemical

Similar documents
CHANGES IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER S CLASS I MARKET: Staff Article John Mykrantz. June 2016

COMPONENT TESTS OF CLASS I MILK AND FLUID MILK PRODUCTS PACIFIC NORTHWEST ORDER: 2008 AND 2013

CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW PROCEDURES

Food Buying Guide for Child Nutrition Programs. U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service

Slide 1. Slide 2. 2 clicks each reg comes up separately.

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza:

Equine Herpesvirus (EHV) Myeloencephalopathy

Stafff Paper Prepared by: Corey Freije. December 2018

Slide 1. Welcome to a short training on the USDA Child Nutrition Labeling Program. This is what is most commonly referred

UPPER MIDWEST MARKETING AREA ANALYSIS OF COMPONENT LEVELS AND SOMATIC CELL COUNT IN INDIVIDUAL HERD MILK AT THE FARM LEVEL 2010

UPPER MIDWEST MARKETING AREA ANALYSIS OF COMPONENT LEVELS AND SOMATIC CELL COUNT IN INDIVIDUAL HERD MILK AT THE FARM LEVEL 2015

SANDWICH PB&J LUNCHBLE 2B

Availability of FSIS Compliance Guidelines for Allergens and. Ingredients of Public Health Concern: Identification, Prevention

DIETARY RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE WIC PROGRAM

UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS

Biomechanical Analysis of Grubbing Technique in the Use of Fire Handtools A Synopsis

Navigating Nutrition Standards for All Foods Sold in Schools. An Overview of Requirements

Using USDA Food Products: Partner Agency Manual

UPPER MIDWEST DAIRY NEWS

Ingredient Calculations

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Quarterly Hogs and Pigs

Building Blocks. for Fun and Healthy Meals. A Menu Planner for the Child and Adult Care Food Program

SANDWICH SUB COMB-HAM+TURK+CHZ

Objective. Review USDA s Smart Snacks in Schools and the impact on Fulton County Schools.

Welcome everyone! This training will cover Section 2 of the new Administrative Review process, Nutritional Quality and Meal Pattern.

Milk Component for Breakfast and Lunch Meal Pattern

Navigating Nutrition Standards for All Foods Sold in Schools. An Overview of Requirements

Texas Department of Agriculture

APPENDIX 3. How often do you do these things together. Rate the importance of: Youth Parents Grandparents FRIDGE 66

Downloaded from COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION CRA CKERS

Employee Health and Personal Hygiene. for SCHOOL NUTRITION STAFF

Location services Paternity establishment Support establishment Support enforcement Medical support

Grain Component. for Lunch Meal Pattern

Slide 1. Slide 2. USDA Food Distribution Program. CNPweb Food Distribution Program. Address: Login.

March/April 2018 Food Services Newsletter. What s on the Menu?

Child Nutrition & Wellness Kansas State Department of Education Presents. Whole Grain Choo-Choo Train Lesson Plan

Taking the Mystery Out of TEFAP. Rosie Krueger Child Nutrition Programs Vermont Agency of Education. Diversity & Inclusion

AT- RISK AFTERSCHOOL CARE CENTERS FOR SCHOOL FOOD AUTHORITIES. Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)

Accessibility. Reporting Interpretation and Accommodation Requests

U.S. Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service FNS-395 April 2006

Mounds View Public Schools Ends and Goals Regulation

The human body can tolerate deep cold and sweltering

Welcome to the Smart Snack training hosted by Oregon Department of Education Child Nutrition Program. Slide 1

Week of November 1-2, 2018

How Does Your Food Measure Up?

Nutrition Education Research Brief: Message Framing, Use of Interactive Technology to Tailor Messages, and Intervention Intensity.

An Online Cost Calculator for Estimating the Economic Cost of Illness Due to Shiga Toxin- Producing E. coli (STEC) O157 Infections

Level 1 MyPyramid Lessons for Grades 1 and 2 Teamnutrition.usda.gov

METRIC A-A-20120E April 16, 2010 SUPERSEDING A-A-20120D May 5, 2005 COMMERCIAL ITEM DESCRIPTION VEGETABLES, MIXED, CANNED

HOW TO USE THE HELPER SHEETS! Objectives

Cache Valley Transit District

Slide 1 School Breakfast Program Meal Pattern

Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, United States Department of Agriculture

Metro-Nashville Public Schools. Nutrition Services

State of Florida. Sexual Harassment Awareness Training

Managing Aerial Spray Drift. by Paul E. Sumner Extension Engineer

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972

Whole Grains in the School Meal Programs

School Breakfast Meal Pattern Requirements

Wildland Firefighter Health & Safety Report Fall 2001 Missoula Technology and Development Center No. 4

Breakfast Reimbursable Meals: Who Knew?

Santa Clara Family Health Plan Cal MediConnect Plan (Medicare-Medicaid Plan) 2017 Drug List

Child and Adult Care Food Program New Meal Pattern

WHAT IF MY CASEWORKER WON'T CALL ME BACK?

POISON OAK. BACKYARD HORTICULTURE By Gary W. Hickman, Horticulture Advisor University of California Cooperative Extension, Mariposa County

Educational Interpreters Performance Standards

MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HUMAN RESOURCES POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL

Rate What YOU Ate. a companion resource to

Nutritional Content of Game Meat

Guidelines for In-house Composting of Catastrophic Poultry Mortality*

School Breakfast Meal Pattern Requirements

National School Lunch Program. Illinois State Board of Education Nutrition and Wellness Division

Laramie County School District 1 Mar 1, 2019 thru Mar 29, 2019

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Services Clarification and Collaboration. DCFS Rebecca Patton

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume II, Issue 5 October 05

Civil Rights Compliance for Patients

IT and Information Acceptable Use Policy

Department of Origin: Integrated Healthcare Services. Approved by: Chief Medical Officer Department(s) Affected: Date approved: 01/10/17

NO SMOKING POLICY. Organisational

The Moreno Valley Fire Department Offers The Following Water Safety Information:

The Salvation Army Brevard County Domestic Violence Program Auxiliary Aids & Services Plan

4-H Rabbit Proficiency Program A Member s Guide

FOOD PRODUCTION RECORDS

NORTHEAST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL NETWORK POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL HOSPITAL-WIDE POLICY

Application for Cadet Membership

Pediatric Dental and Vision

Southwestern Region 3 Carson National Forest

Dade Legal Aid Auxiliary Aids Plan

Calendar Year Deductible Annual Benefit Maximum. ADA Code Covered Services Member pays

Your Rights Your right to apply Your right to a state hearing Your civil rights

Smoke-Free Campus Guidelines

Smile SM Plus 50/1500/Ortho/MAC

Ergonomics Wanda Daley Drive Ames, Iowa (515) Copyright

Auxiliary Aids Plan Orlando Police Department InVEST/STOP Program

RABBIT LEVEL TESTS UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SANTA BARBARA COUNTY 4-H YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Levels 1-4 & Level A

PANCREATIC ISLET TRANSPLANT

Alzheimer s Awareness

CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER of Laredo Webb County Volunteer Application

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Technology & Development Program Airtanker 57-2866-MTDC October 2 51/57 Drop Guides Ground Pattern n Perfor formance of the Columbia BV-234 Helicopter Using the Modified 3-Gallon Griffith fith Big Dipper Helibucket Paul Solarz, Program Leader, and Cammie Jordan, Project Assistant The Wildland Fire Chemical Systems (WFCS) program tests a variety of fixed- and rotarywing tankers to determine the parameters for optimal ground pattern coverage over a wide range of fuel and fire conditions. The Columbia BV- 234 using the Modified 3-Gallon Griffith Big Dipper Helibucket (referred to as the modified 3- gallon Griffith helibucket) is one of a family of helibuckets designed for use with a variety of Type 1 helicopters. The helibucket is constructed of double bond polyurethane mounted to a steel reinforced rim and bottom (Figure 1). The bottom opening is sealed from the inside by a round door. The bucket is evacuated by activating of a hydraulic cylinder that pulls a door up off the bottom. The helibucket was modified with the use of an onboard computer that controls the door movement (and therefore the flow rate) as needed for various coverage levels. The bucket s inside diameter is 96 inches at the top and 8 inches at the bottom. It is 82 inches tall. The drops in these tests were made with a maximum volume of 3 gallons. Tests included airspeeds from 33 to 99 knots (38 to 114 mph) and drop heights from 35 to 115 feet from the bottom of the helibucket to the ground. The drops were made with three different materials: water, foam, and gum-thickened retardant. The Missoula Technology and Development Center tested the Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket with a series of drops over an array of plastic bowls much like Cool Whip containers. The quantity of material in each bowl was measured and the data were used to determine the drop pattern. Figure 1 82% 4 7/8 x 2 1/2 5 15/16 x 3 1/16 Print to Outside Edge of Borders No Not Print Borders Figure 1 The Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket. Flow rate, drop height, and airspeed all have an effect on the drop pattern. Since this type of helicopter is normally used over a narrow range of heights and speeds and because this system produces multiple flow rates, information about an average drop is presented. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show the effect of increasing the flow rate from 1 gallons per second to 3 gallons For additional Information contact: Greg Lovellette, Project Leader; Missoula Technology & Development Center; 5785 Highway 1 West; Missoula, MT 5988. Phone: 46 329 4815; Fax: 46 329 4811; E-mail: glovellette@fs.fed.us; Lotus Notes: Greg Lovellette/WO/USDAFS 1

Width (feet) 2 15 1 5 Columbia BV-234 With Modified 3-Gallon Griffith Helibucket Gum-thickened retardant with the flow rate of 1 gal/sec 5. 4. 4. 4. 3. 225 45 675 9 1125 135 1575 18 4. Line Length (feet) 2. 3. 6. 4. 5. 1. 6. 6. 5. 2 15 1 5 Figure 2 Drop pattern characteristics for the Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping gum-thickened retardant at an airspeed of 52 knots (6 mph), drop height of 74 feet, and flow rate of 1 gallons per second. The contour lines are at coverage levels of.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 1 gallons per 1 square feet. Width (feet) 2 15 1 5 Columbia BV-234 With Modified 3-Gallon Griffith Helibucket 5. Gum-thickened retardant with the flow rate of 2 gal/sec 6. 6. 5. 6. 8. 1. 6. 6. 7. 5. 5.4. 225 45 675 9 1125 135 1575 18 5. 5. 2. 7. 7. 1. 2. 3. Line Length (feet) 2 15 1 5 Figure 3 Drop pattern characteristics for the Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping gum-thickened retardant at an airspeed of 53 knots (61 mph), drop height of 73 feet, and flow rate of 2 gallons per second. The contour lines are at coverage levels of.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 1 gallons per 1 square feet. 2

Width (feet) 2 15 1 5 6. Columbia BV-234 With Modified 3-Gallon Griffith Helibucket 2. 1. 1. 8. 5. 5. 4. Gum-thickened retardant at the flow rate of 3 gal/sec 7.1.9. 7. 3. 5 225 45 675 9 1125 135 1575 18 Line Length (feet) 2 15 1 Figure 4 Drop pattern characteristics for the Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket with gum-thickened retardant at an airspeed of 33 knots (38 mph), drop height of 88 feet, and flow rate of 3 gallons per second. The contour lines are at coverage levels of.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 1 gallons per 1 square feet. per second with airspeeds of 33 to 53 knots (38 to 61 mph) and drop heights ranging from 73 to 88 feet. The proper amount of fire-retarding materials to be applied (expressed as coverage levels in gallons per 1 square feet) differs depending on the fuel model. Table 1 shows the coverage needed for specific fuel models using both the National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) and Fire Behavior Fuel Model descriptions. The results of drop tests allow managers to estimate the length of line a specific helibucket produces at various coverage levels. Table 2 or Figure 5 can be used to determine the maximum line length at each coverage level produced by water using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket. Table 3 or Figure 6 can be used to determine the maximum line length at each coverage level produced by foam using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket. Table 4 or Figure 7 can be used to determine the maximum line length at each coverage level produced by gumthickened retardant using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket. The length-of-line graphs predict line length (in feet) as a function of flow rate (in gallons per second). The tables are constructed by selecting the drop producing the longest length of line (on the ground) at each coverage level. Either the graphs or tables may be used to estimate the flow rate required to produce the maximum length of line for a given coverage level. The tables show an ideal case, while the graphs represent the average. To select the proper flow rate, first use Table 1 to determine the coverage level required by the NFDRS or Fire Behavior Fuel Model. The coverage levels in Table 1 represent the coverage level required for average fire intensity for each fuel model. The required coverage level can be adjusted up or down depending on the actual fire intensity. Once the required coverage level is determined, the flow rate can be found. Use the graph for the material dropped (water, foam, or gum-thickened retardant) to find the flow rate that produces the longest line for the desired coverage level. The same information can be found in the appropriate drop table. For example, if a fire is burning in NFDRS Fuel Model O (Fire Behavior Model 4), represented by southern rough, Table 1 shows that a coverage level of 6 is required. The table for water shows that for coverage level 6, a flow rate of about 2 gallons per second produces the longest line (699 feet) when applied at an airspeed of 71 knots (82 mph). 3

Table 1 The retardant coverage needed for specific fuel types. Fuel Model National Fire Danger Rating System Coverage Level (NFDRS) Fire Behavior (gal/1 sq. ft) Description A, L, S 1 1 Annual and perennial western grasses, tundra C 2 Conifer with grass H, R 8 2 Shortneedle closed conifer; summer hardwood E, P, U 9 Longneedle conifer; fall hardwood T 2 Sagebrush with grass N 3 Sawgrass F 5 3 Intermediate brush (green) K 11 Light slash G 1 4 Shortneedle conifer (heavy dead litter) O 4 Southern rough F, Q 6 6 Intermediate brush (cured), Alaska black spruce B, O 4 California mixed chaparral, high pocosin J 12 Greater than 6 Medium slash I 13 Heavy slash Table 2 Water tests producing the longest line at various coverage levels. Coverage Level Flow Rate Line Length Speed (gal/1 sq. ft) (gal/sec) (feet) (knots) Length of Line (feet).5 1 1664 52 1 1 167 52 2 1 1495 52 3 1 1416 52 4 1 1222 52 6 2 699 71 8 3 423 33 1 3 338 33 Effect of Flow Rate on Length of Line at Various Coverage Levels Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping water 2 CL =.5 CL = 1 CL = 2 CL = 3 CL = 4 CL = 6 16 CL = 8 CL = 1 CL = Coverage Level 12 8 The ground drop characteristics for the Columbia BV-234 with the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket were derived through controlled test drop procedures on flat ground (Figure 8). This information is to serve only as a guide in assisting field personnel to determine the proper drop height and airspeed for delivering water, foam, or gumthickened retardant. Actual coverage may vary depending on terrain, wind, weather, and pilot proficiency. 4 1 15 2 25 3 Flow Rate (gal/sec) Figure 5 Use this graph to estimate the flow rate needed to produce the maximum line length of water at various coverage levels. 4

Table 3 Foam tests producing the longest line at various coverage levels. Coverage Level Flow Rate Line Length Speed (gal/1 sq. ft) (gal/sec) (feet) (knots).5 1 2113 69 1 1 29 69 2 1 1299 69 3 1 135 51 4 3 73 45 6 3 54 45 8 3 155 45 1 3 19 47 Table 4 Gum-thickened retardant tests producing the longest line at various coverage levels. Coverage Level Flow Rate Line Length Speed (gal/1 sq. ft) (gal/sec) (feet) (knots).5 1 2182 77 1 1 275 77 2 1 1444 64 3 1 916 64 4 3 623 76 6 3 453 77 8 3 287 77 1 3 169 77 Length of Line (feet) 2 16 12 Effect of Flow Rate on Length of Line at Various Coverage Levels 8 Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping foam CL =.5 CL = 1 CL = 2 CL = 3 CL = 4 CL = 6 CL = 8 CL = 1 CL = Coverage Level Length of Line (feet) Effect of Flow Rate on Length of Line at Various Coverage Levels Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping gum-thickened retardant 2 16 12 8 CL =.5 CL = 1 CL = 2 CL = 3 CL = 4 CL = 6 CL = 8 CL = 1 CL = Coverage Level 4 4 1 15 2 25 3 Flow Rate (gal/sec) 1 15 2 25 3 Flow Rate (gal/sec) Figure 6 Use this graph to estimate the flow rate needed to produce the maximum line length of foam at various coverage levels. Figure 7 Use this graph to estimate the flow rate needed to produce the maximum line length of gumthickened retardant at various coverage levels. 5

Figure 8??% 4 7/8 x 5 7/8 3 3/8 x 4 1/16 Print to Outside Edge of Borders No Not Print Borders About the Authors Cammie Jordan is a Project Assistant for the Wildland Fire Chemical Systems Program at MTDC. She is an elementary education student at the University of Montana and has worked for MTDC since 1998. Paul Solarz is Program Leader for the Wildland Fire Chemical Systems Group. He received his bachelor s degree from Eastern Oregon State College in 1986. Paul has worked in Aviation and Fire Management since 1973, serving at seven Ranger Districts and in two Forest Supervisor s offices. He has an extensive operational background in fire, fuels, and aviation. Additional single copies of this document may be ordered from: USDA Forest Service Missoula Technology and Development Center 5785 Highway 1 West Missoula, MT 5988 Phone: 46 329 3978 Fax: 46 329 4811 E-mail: wo_mtdc_pubs@fs.fed.us For additional technical information, contact Paul Solarz at the address above. Phone: 46 329 4719 Fax: 46 329 4811 Internet: psolarz@fs.fed.us Lotus Notes: Paul Solarz/WO/ USDAFS An electronic copy of this document is available on the Forest Service s FSWeb Intranet at: http://fsweb.mtdc.wo.fs.fed.us For additional Information contact: Greg Lovellette, Project Leader Missoula Technology & Development Center 5785 Highway 1 West Missoula, MT 5988 Phone: 46 329 4815 Fax: 46 329 4811 E-mail: glovellette@fs.fed.us Lotus Notes: Greg Lovellette/WO/ USDAFS Figure 8 Drop test of the Columbia BV-234 using the modified 3-gallon Griffith helibucket dropping gum-thickened retardant. The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating Federal and State agencies, and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader, and does not constitute an endorsement by the Department of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc) should phone USDA s TARGET Center at (22) 72-26 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 225-941, or call (22) 72-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 6