University of Washington Self Efficacy Scale (UW-SES) (Multiple Sclerosis Version)

Similar documents
Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales

Cleveland Clinic Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis. Mellen Center Approaches: Falls and Fall Prevention in MS. Q: What is a fall?

What Does a PROMIS T-score Mean for Physical Function?

Increasing awareness following acquired brain injury: A quantative analysis of an outpatient education group

Reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Basic Pain Data Set items as self-report measures

GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR MANAGING CHRONIC CONDITIONS

I tell my patients, If I can do it, you can do it. Lea Stewart

Introducing the OWLQOL and WRSM Instruments

Many people with physical

CARING FOR SOMEONE WITH PROSTATE CANCER

CAP Lung Cancer Medical Writers Circle

Sexual Presence: A Mindfulness-based Approach to Increasing Sexual Satisfaction Among Individuals with SCI

Sexual dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis.

LYMPHOEDEMA NEEDS QUESTIONNAIRE -BREAST CANCER (LNQ-BC)

3/5/2014. New Research Initiatives to Improve QoL of Persons with SCI Across the Globe. What Are the SCI International Datasets?

FUNCTIONAL STATUS. TBIFIM = Functional Status

UNDERSTANDING YOUR COUPLE CHECKUP RESULTS

WHO Quality of Life. health other than the cause of a disease or the side effects that come along with it. These other

Title of measure: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)

Sleep Health Center. You have been scheduled for an Insomnia Treatment Program consultation to further discuss your

IN A RECENT AMERICAN Congress of Rehabilitation

Instruments Available for Use in Assessment Center

Self-Assessment - WHO Quality of Life Caldwell 1

This section will help you to identify and manage some of the more difficult emotional responses you may feel after diagnosis.

Spinal Cord (2017) 55, & 2017 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved /17

Updates TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY MODEL SYSTEM UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE

PROMIS-29 V2.0 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores. Ron D. Hays. Karen L. Spritzer, Ben Schalet, Dave Cella. September 27, 2017, 3:30-4:00pm

The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics

Acknowledgements. Illness Behavior A cognitive and behavioral phenomenon. Seeking medical care. Communicating pain to others

Service-Learning Student Evaluation Annual Report

Q: What can you tell us about the work you do and your involvement with children with autism?

Family & Individual Support Program - Handbook

Lars Jacobsson 1,2,3* and Jan Lexell 1,3,4

Quality of Life Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults (QoL-AGHDA)

How can clinical psychologists help with chronic pain?

CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PATIENTS WITH AN OSTOMY

Interventions, Effects, and Outcomes in Occupational Therapy

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER Men s Health Center and Male Fertility Laboratory Sperm & Testis Cryopreservation Program Patient NAME and ID

High Performance Living Handout. From the field, to the office and to the home: Ideas on achieving work-life balance

5: Family, children and friends

MERLE MULLINS COUNSELING REGISTRATION FORM (Please Print) CLIENT INFORMATION

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Patient Reported Outcome High Priority

NHS Fife Department of Psychology. Sexual Difficulties. Help moodcafe.co.uk

HEALTHY AND FULFILLING LIFESTYLE

In order to receive the maximum benefit from your rehabilitation program, it is important to understand and comply with the following guidelines:

Palliative Care Asking the questions that matter to me

INFORMATION ABOUT THE FATIGUE SYMPTOM INVENTORY (FSI) AND THE MULTIDIMENSIONAL FATIGUE SYMPTOM INVENTORY (MFSI)

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (PTSD)

How to Ask for a Reasonable Accommodation of Your Disability from the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH)

THE MENTAL SIDE OF SPORTS INJURY REHABILITATION

Sleep and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Sustaining hope: recovery in social care services

Fatigue after stroke. A patient and carer s guide

The Neuropsychological Impairment Scale (NIS) Self-Report Form

Dementia Quality of Life (DEMQOL)

2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

Bolton Health and Wellbeing Community Investments. Investment Themes and Priorities

1. PERSON-CENTRED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING

QOLRAD QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS

6/29/2018. Chris Searles, MD. I have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose*

KAP Keys. For Clinicians. Based on TIP 24 A Guide to Substance Abuse Services for Primary Care Clinicians. CSAT s Knowledge Application Program

I tell my patients, If I can do it, you can do it. Lea Stewart

These questions are about the physical problems which may have occurred as a result of your stroke. Quite a bit of strength

COPING WITH LOSS AND GRIEF

2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Patient Reported Outcome High Priority

Stress, Problem Solving, and Substance Use

This questionnaire is designed to find out how you have been feeling during the last two weeks. Please circle only one number for each question.

The UW Medicine Neurosciences Institute

NAME OF PATIENT: STREET ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: SEX: Male Female AGE: BIRTHDATE: MARITAL STATUS: PATIENT EMPLOYED BY: BUSINESS ADDRESS:

INSOMNIA SEVERITY INDEX

INTEGRATING REALISTIC RESEARCH INTO EVERY DAY PRACTICE

International Childbirth Education Association. Postpartum Doula Program

BAPSI Score Report Page 1 of 8 BAPSI

DECISION OF THE WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

Contents. Chapter. Coping with Crisis. Section 16.1 Understand Crisis Section 16.2 The Crises People Face. Chapter 16 Coping with Crisis

Quality of Life Instrument - Breast Cancer Patient Version

R Number. Patient Intake

WEISS FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT RATING SCALES (WFIRS) SELF REPORT RATING SCALE

Getting through a diagnosis of Autism How to support family members

RISK VS RIGHTS: SAFELY SUPPORTING CONSUMERS WITH SEXUAL TRAUMA HISTORIES DAVID K. ATTRYDE, MS LPC

TRAUMA INFORMED CARE: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE WORKING ALLIANCE

Stroke Impact Scale VERSION 3.0

FACTORS SUPPORTING THE EMPLOYMENT OF YOUNG ADULT PEER PROVIDERS: PERSPECTIVES OF PEERS & SUPERVISORS

Conscious Living Counseling & Education Center 3239 Oak Ridge Loop East, West Fargo ND (701)

Talk about Constipation

UCLA Social Support Inventory * (UCLA-SSI) Christine Dunkel-Schetter. Lawrence Feinstein. Jyllian Call. University of California, Los Angeles

SAMPLE REPORT. Conners 3 Parent Short Form Assessment Report. By C. Keith Conners, Ph.D.

Piers Harris Children s Self-Concept Scale, Second Edition (Piers-Harris 2)

COMP 3020: Human-Computer Interaction I Fall 2017

Voice & Swallow Clinics

Good. Poor [ ] [ ] Yes, at all [ A ] Moderate activities, such as moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf [ ] [ ]

GLOBAL HEALTH. PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7 PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7+2

Chapter 13 and 16. Combined by Mrs. Parker Taken from Families Today Text

Kids Help Phone. Kids Help Phone: Supporting the Mental Health & Well-Being of Canada s young people

Do I Have a Drinking Problem?

Welcome to Lead Scotland Specialists in Linking Education and Disability

THE GENERAL WELL-BEING SCHEDULE SEX: M: [ ] F: [ ] AGE: 1. How have you been feeling in general during the past month?

PSYCHOLOGICAL FIRST AID: AN OVERVIES FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS KEN LEE, LSW, DCSW

YEAR NEW HAPPY. Philip Kurian is out. Ring in the New Year!

ELDER ABUSE SCREENING TOOL (EAST)

Transcription:

University of Washington Self Efficacy Scale (UW-SES) (Multiple Sclerosis Version) by the University of Washington Center on Outcomes Research in Rehabilitation (UWCORR) Mailing Address: UWCORR UW Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Box 354237 Seattle, WA 98195 Telephone (206) 221-2414 Toll free:1-800-504-0564 FAX 206-685-9224 Email: uwcorr@u.washington.edu COPYRIGHT STATEMENT AND USERS AGREEMENT The UW-SES Outcome Measure is the intellectual property of the University of Washington and is copyrighted. The development of this instrument was supported under grants funded by NIH and NIDRR. The permission to use the UW-SES must be requested prior to use or publication from uwcorr@u.washington.edu. Permission will be given for non-commercial use. The UW-SES may not be sold or incorporated into a product to be sold, by anyone including clinicians and researchers. The instrument may not under any circumstances, be changed in any way without explicit permission from the authors as even minor changes may alter performance. Any other use, including translation, requires advance written permission from the UWCORR. Copyright of the UW-SES is the sole property of the University of Washington, which reserves all rights in connection therewith.

Instructions for using the UW-SES Scale for MS: The self-efficacy scales shown here were developed in a sample of persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) and spinal cord injury (SCI). Below you will find both the full 19 item scale and the six item short form for use in persons with MS. Both scales are intended for use in a self-report survey. SCORING: Items can be summed and then transformed to generate a total score for each form. Responses to each item are given the values shown below. Scales cannot be scored if there are missing responses to items (with the exception of items 18 and 19 on the full scale). Not at all A little Quite a bit A lot Completely 1 2 3 4 5 19 Item Scale: Items 1-17 are summed as a first step. This will give you a total score that ranges from the value of 17 to 85. Items 18 and 19 are not included in the scoring of the full scale. However, these items were included on the form as they cover important content and may be very informative to the researchers or clinicians. After summing the 17 items, you will then transform the scores to a t-scale metric using the concordance table provided on the next page. For comparison purposes, the mean in the development sample was 50.0 with a standard deviation of 9.7. 6 Item Scale: All 6 items are summed as a first step. After summing, scores are transformed to a t- score metric using the concordance table provided on the next page. For comparison purposes, the mean in the development sample was 49.9 with a standard deviation of 9.3. Note that all 6 items on the short form are also included in the full scale so both a 17 item score and a 6 item score can be generated from the full scale. Publication: Amtmann D, Bamer AM, Cook KF, Askew RL, Noonan VK, Brockway JA. University of Washington self-efficacy scale: a new self-efficacy scale for people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1757-65

Full 17 Item Scale to T score Concordance Table T T 6 Item Short Form to T score Concordance Table T 17 3.46 15.40 55 0.45 45.50 6 3.00 20.0 18 3.19 18.10 56 0.39 46.10 7 2.62 23.8 19 3.00 20.00 57 0.34 46.60 8 2.35 26.5 20 2.85 21.50 58 0.28 47.20 9 2.11 28.9 21 2.71 22.90 59 0.22 47.80 10 1.90 31.0 22 2.60 24.00 60 0.17 48.30 11 1.71 32.9 23 2.49 25.10 61 0.11 48.90 12 1.53 34.7 24 2.40 26.00 62 0.05 49.50 13 1.36 36.4 25 2.31 26.90 63 0.01 50.10 14 1.20 38.0 26 2.22 27.80 64 0.06 50.60 15 1.04 39.6 27 2.14 28.60 65 0.12 51.20 16 0.89 41.1 28 2.07 29.30 66 0.18 51.80 17 0.74 42.6 29 1.99 30.10 67 0.25 52.50 18 0.59 44.1 30 1.92 30.80 68 0.31 53.10 19 0.44 45.6 31 1.85 31.50 69 0.37 53.70 20 0.29 47.1 32 1.78 32.20 70 0.44 54.40 21 0.14 48.6 33 1.72 32.80 71 0.50 55.00 22 0.02 50.2 34 1.65 33.50 72 0.57 55.70 23 0.18 51.8 35 1.59 34.10 73 0.64 56.40 24 0.34 53.4 36 1.53 34.70 74 0.71 57.10 25 0.51 55.1 37 1.46 35.40 75 0.79 57.90 26 0.69 56.9 38 1.40 36.00 76 0.87 58.70 27 0.90 59.0 39 1.34 36.60 77 0.95 59.50 28 1.13 61.3 40 1.28 37.20 78 1.04 60.40 29 1.41 64.1 41 1.23 37.70 79 1.13 61.30 30 1.89 68.9 42 1.17 38.30 80 1.24 62.40 43 1.11 38.90 81 1.36 63.60 44 1.05 39.50 82 1.50 65.00 45 1.00 40.00 83 1.66 66.60 46 0.94 40.60 84 1.89 68.90 47 0.88 41.20 85 2.26 72.60 48 0.83 41.70 49 0.77 42.30 50 0.72 42.80 51 0.66 43.40 52 0.61 43.90 53 0.56 44.40 54 0.50 45.00

UW Self-Efficacy Scale for Multiple Sclerosis Not at all A little Quite a bit A lot Completely How confident are you that: 1. You can keep the fatigue caused by your MS from interfering with the things you want to do? 2. You can keep the physical discomfort of your MS from interfering with the things you want to do? 3. You can keep the pain of your MS from interfering with the things you want to do? 4. You can keep the emotional distress caused by your MS from interfering with the things you want to do? 5. You can keep any other symptoms or health problems you have from interfering with the things you want to do? 6. You can do things other than just taking medication to reduce how much your MS affects your everyday life? 7. You can keep your MS from interfering with managing your affairs? 8. You can keep your MS from interfering with family relationships? 9. You can keep your MS from interfering with close friendships? 10. You can keep your MS from interfering with your ability to deal with unexpected events? 11. You can keep your MS from interfering with your ability to interact socially? 12. You can keep your MS from being the center of your life? 13. You can keep your MS from interfering with having a fulfilling life? 14. You can, using all the resources available to you, minimize the occurrence of MS related complications (such as bladder accidents or falls)? 15. You can bounce back from frustration, discouragement or disappointment that MS may cause you? 16. You can, using all the resources available to you, successfully manage your medication needs? 17. You can figure out effective solutions to MS-related issues that come up? 18. You can keep your MS from interfering with having an emotionally intimate relationship with a spouse or partner? Prefer not to answer Does not apply 19. You can keep your MS from interfering with having a satisfying sexual relationship? Prefer not to answer Does not apply

UW Self-Efficacy Scale for Multiple Sclerosis Short Form Not at all A little Quite a bit A lot Completely How confident are you that: 1. You can keep the physical discomfort of your MS from interfering with the things you want to do? 2. You can keep your MS from interfering with your ability to deal with unexpected events? 3. You can keep your MS from interfering with your ability to interact socially? 4. You can keep your MS from being the center of your life? 5. You can bounce back from frustration, discouragement or disappointment that MS may cause you? 6. You can figure out effective solutions to MS-related issues that come up?