Concept of Measurement: RA Defining Decrements in Physical Function

Similar documents
HEALTH STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE 2.0

For each question you will be asked to fill in a bubble in each line: 1. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

Concept of measurement: RA defining decrements in physical functioning

Patient Follow-up Form - Version 1.1

Individual Patient Characteristics Are There Differences in Responsiveness: Or How to Characterize Patients for Pivotal Trials

Please complete ALL 6 pages of the form in blue/black ink. Patient Acct # Provider # BMI # Height Weight

continued TABLE E-1 Outlines of the HRQOL Scoring Systems

Comparative study of health status in working men and women using Standard Form -36 questionnaire.

Falk Hiepe,5 Dinesh Khanna,6 Enkeleida Nikaï,7 Geoffroy Coteur,8 Michael Schiff9

Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment

Comparison of health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis and effects of etanercept treatment

ORIGINAL ARTICLE R. F. VAN VOLLENHOVEN, 1 D. FELSON, 2 V. STRAND, 3 M. E. WEINBLATT, 4 K. LUIJTENS, 5 AND E. C. KEYSTONE 6 INTRODUCTION

SHOULDER Survey Packet for Measuring Your Improvement

Vibeke Strand 1,5, Joel Kremer 2, Gene Wallenstein 3*, Keith S. Kanik 3, Carol Connell 3, David Gruben 3, Samuel H. Zwillich 3 and Roy Fleischmann 4

What I Have Learned Over the Years - Keystone s Top 10 -

LIST CHANGES IN YOUR MEDICATION OR SUPPLEMENTS INTAKE (add new meds, changes in old meds or meds you stopped taking) Are you taking it?

Ware NIH Lecture Handouts

(Poster presented on Sunday 05 March, 08:50 08:55; 2017 AAD Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA)

University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; 2

All subjects who had baseline evaluations, including all randomized subjects Visits Baseline Visits 1-3, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24 VISIT codes

Designing a life of wellness. Evaluation of the demonstration program at the Wilder Humboldt campus

LupusPRO (Lupus Patient Reported Outcome Tool) v1.7

Comprehensive disease control (CDC): what does achieving CDC mean for patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Does abatacept make a difference?

Interpretation Clinical significance: what does it mean?

Treat - to - Target Pathway Commissioning Chronic and Complex Care MIDLANDS RHEUMATOLOGY & MUSCULOSKELETAL (MSK) COMMISSIONING NETWORK

For more information: Quality of Life. World Health Organization Definition of Health

ABSTRACT ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Laure Gossec. Souhila Ahdjoudj. Evo Alemao. Vibeke Strand

Medical History. Instructions. My telephone number is: 1 Tools Medical History

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate effects of the anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody sarilumab administered

Supplementary Appendix

Appendix A. DePaul Symptom Questionnaire. Please answer the following questions.

Patient Reported Quality of Life in an Early Psoriatic Arthritis Cohort

ASSESSMENT OF QOL IN PATIENTS WITH PRADER WILLY SYNDROME

This is a repository copy of New GRAPPA and EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis: process and challenges faced.

The Chinese University of Hong Kong The Nethersole School of Nursing. CADENZA Training Programme

Secukinumab provides rapid and sustained pain relief in psoriatic arthritis over 2 years: results from the FUTURE 2 study

Improved patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with abatacept: results from a phase 3 trial

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

Validation of the Russian version of the Quality of Life-Rheumatoid Arthritis Scale (QOL-RA Scale)

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in England

The impact of rheumatoid arthritis and treatment on patients lives

National Cancer Institute

10/28/2013. Disclosures. Objectives. Background. Study Design. Key Inclusion Criteria

These questions are about the physical problems which may have occurred as a result of your stroke. Quite a bit of strength

10/30/2013. Disclosures. Defining Flares in RA RA Flare Group

Elbow and Forearm Pain Form

New Evidence reports on presentations given at ACR Improving Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient-Reported Outcomes with Rituximab

Pros and Cons of Combination MTX+ Biologics vs Monotherapy with Biologics: the place of immunogenicity

Discussion Areas. Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice and Research Arthritis as an Exemplar

Workshop Minutes. Toward Consensus Development: Qualifying Endpoint Measures for. Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

Alexandra Savova, Guenka Petrova. Medical University Sofia Faculty of Pharmacy

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Ning Guo 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

Functional Status Questionnaire & Pain Catastrophizing Scale. A Presentation by: Jacob leroux, NAM NGUYEN & DEREK TITUS

Association between disease severity and body mass index in psoriasis patients enrolled in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

Good. Poor [ ] [ ] Yes, at all [ A ] Moderate activities, such as moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling, or playing golf [ ] [ ]

James R. O Dell, M.D. University of Nebraska Medical Center

Extended report. Clinical and epidemiological research

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Impact of intensive treatment and remission on health-related quality of life in early and established rheumatoid arthritis

Vibeke Strand 1*, David Fiorentino 2, ChiaChi Hu 3, Robert M Day 3, Randall M Stevens 3 and Kim A Papp 4

CHECK LIST FORM-MONTH 42 (Please note Month 42 is from enrolment not randomisation)

Ethnic Minority RA Consortium (EMRAC)

THE CORPORATE REPUTATION OF PHARMA 2015 THE PERSPECTIVE OF 139 PATIENT GROUPS with an interest in DIABETES

290O - Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with ribociclib + fulvestrant: results from MONALEESA-3

Taming the wolf: Treating to target, treating to remission new strategies for SLE

Epilepsy, co-morbidities and Quality of Life. Professor Gus A Baker PhD FBPS

Tuberculosis and Biologic Therapies: Risk and Prevention

Investor Presentation Post-Interim Results Update. September 2011

intolerance to tumour necrosis

Healthy Ageing. 12 years of results from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women s Health (ALSWH) Professor Julie Byles

Ronald F. van Vollenhoven Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID) The Karolinska Institute Stockholm, Sweden

Patient Reported Outcomes

Jane T Osterhaus 1* and Oana Purcaru 2

Key words: Systemic sclerosis, pulmonary arterial hypertension, outcome measures, Delphi.

Prevalence Studies of Chronic Pain Using (MDHAQ) in Narsinhpur a Developed Village in India

Patient-reported outcomes of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment

Vectra DA: A Better Measure for Predicting Radiographic Progression in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Preventing Pain in RA

Patient-Centered Outcomes of Health Care

Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) Data Showed Broad and Rapid Relief From Burden of Symptoms In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Title: The ideal target for psoriatic arthritis? Comparison of remission and low

Treat to a Target The New Paradigm in the Management of RA. Boulos Haraoui, MD FRCPC Université de Montréal Institut de rhumatologie de Montréal

Efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy in methotrexate-naive patients with early or established rheumatoid arthritis

11/5/2011. Disclosures. Key References. JAK Inhibitors. Tofacitinib(CP ): Phase 2 Studies

Prediction and benefits of minimal disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and active skin disease in the ADEPT trial

Measuring Patient Outcomes:

Vibeke Strand 1, Mark Kosinski 2*, Ari Gnanasakthy 3, Usha Mallya 3 and Shephard Mpofu 4

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab DE019 OLE (5-year) Clinical Study Report Amendment 1 R&D/06/095. (For National Authority Use Only)

Stroke Impact Scale VERSION 3.0

o never o 1 day per week or less o 2-3 days per week o 4-6 days per week o every day

ABSTRACT. Keywords: Africa; Efficacy; Etanercept; Maintenance therapy; Middle East; Rheumatoid arthritis ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The RAW Deal on Knee Replacements

Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients

American College of Rheumatology Analyst and Investor Meeting November 6, 2011

Charité - University Hospital, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2 Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 3

Parent Pain Questionnaire Understanding your child s pain

OPEN ACCESS EXTENDED REPORT. Clinical and epidemiological research

The Prognos+c Value of Pre- Diagnosis Health- Related Quality of Life on Survival: A Prospec+ve Cohort Study of Older Americans with Lung Cancer

CHAPTER - III METHODOLOGY

Transcription:

Concept of Measurement: RA Defining Decrements in Physical Function Vibeke Strand, MD Biopharmaceutical Consultant Adjunct Clinical Professor, Division of Immunology, Stanford University

Disclosures: Consultant Abbott Alder Amgen Ampio Antares Anthera AstraZeneca BiogenIdec BioMarin Biotest BMS Cbio CanFite Carbyan Celgene Chelsea Crescendo Cypress Emergent Biosolutions Forest Genentech GSK Human Genome Sciences Idera Incyte Janssen Jazz Lexicon Genetics Lilly Logical Therapeutics Medimmune MerckSerono Molecular Partners Novartis Novo Nordisk Orbimed Pfizer Regeneron Relypsa Rigel Roche Sanofi Savient SKK Takeda Teikoku UCB Vertex Xencor

Responsiveness of Physician v Patient Reported Measures SJC TJC Physician-Reported Measures MD GLOBAL HAQ DI PET PBO SES SES = Standard Effect Size SF-36 PF SF-36 PCS Patient-Reported Measures SF-36 MCS SD = 1 Better -2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 Worse Strand et al. Rheumatol 2004; 43:640-7

Responsiveness of Physician v Patient Reported Measures SJC TJC Physician-Reported Measures MD GLOBAL HAQ DI PET SF-36 PF SF-36 PCS Patient-Reported Measures LEF SES PBO SES MTX SES SES = Standard Effect Size SF-36 MCS SD = 1 Better -2.00-1.50-1.00-0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 Worse Strand et al. Rheumatol 2004; 43:640-7

SF-36: Short Form 36 Health Survey Validated, widely used generic measure of HRQOL 8 Domains: Scored 0 (severe impairment) 100 (no impairment); age, sex adjusted rates from 0 30 raw scores 2 Summary Scores Physical Component: PCS Measures how decrements in physical function affect day to day activities Impact of physical impairment / disability on HRQOL Mental Component: MCS Impact of mental affect, symptoms of pain on HRQOL Normative based scoring (Mean: 50, SD: 10)

Scoring Domains of SF-36 Domains Items Focus Physical functioning [PFI] Role physical [ROLP] 3a-3j 4a-4d limitations of physical function difficulty performing usual activities due to physical limitations Bodily pain [BP] 7, 8 amount of discomfort and its interference with activities General health [GHP] 1, 11a-d perception of overall personal health Vitality [VIT] 9a, 9e, 9g, 9i pep and energy Social functioning [SF] 6, 10a social contacts and activities Role emotional [ROLP] Mental health [MHI] 5a-5c 9b, 9c, 9d, 9f, 9h difficulty performing usual activities due to emotional limitations depression and anxiety

Physical Function [PF] Domain of SF-36 The following items are about activities you might do during a typical day. Does your health now limit you in these activities? If so, how much? 3a: Vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, participating in strenuous sports 3b: Moderate activities, such s moving a table, pushing a vacuum cleaner, bowling or playing golf 3c: Lifting or carrying groceries 3d: Climbing several flights of stairs 3e: Climbing one flight of stairs 3f: Bending, kneeling or stooping 3g: Walking more than a mile 3h: Walking several blocks 3i: Walking one block 3j: Bathing or dressing yourself

Differences in Physical Activities Queried in HAQ-DI and SF-36 Self care ADLs: HAQ, SF-36 only asks about dressing, grooming SF-36: Reaching overhead SF-36: Instrumental activities: Lifting, carrying groceries Bending, kneeling or stooping Climbing 1 flight of stairs Walking 1 or several blocks SF-36: Discretionary activities: Walking >1 mile Climbing several sets of stairs Moderate activities Vigorous activities

SF-36: 2 Component Model to Derive PCS, MCS Physical component PCS Physical function Role physical Bodily pain General health Vitality Social function Role emotion Mental health Mental component MCS

Scoring PCS and MCS AGG_PHYS = (PF_Z *.42402) + (RP_Z *.35119) + (BP_Z *.31754) + (GH_Z *.24954) + (VT_Z *.02877) + (SF_Z * -.00753) + (RE_Z * -.19206) + (MH_Z * -.22069); AGG_MENT = (PF_Z * -.22999) + (RP_Z * -.12329) + (BP_Z * -.09731) + (GH_Z * -.01571) + (VT_Z *.23534) + (SF_Z *.26876) + (RE_Z *.43407) + (MH_Z *.48581); NEXT, CREATE THE FINAL NORM BASED PHYSICAL AND MENTAL COMPONENT SCORES: PCS = 50 + (AGG_PHYS * 10); MCS = 50 + (AGG_MENT * 10). THUS IF PCS and/or MCS scores are statistically significant, we choose to look across individual domains without p value corrections

Rheumatoid Arthritis Baseline Decrements and Treatment Associated Improvements

Baseline SF-36 Scores in US301 Population vs US Norms 100 90 US Norms (A/G Adjusted) RA Study Population 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Physical Function Role Physical Bodily Pain General Health Perception Vitality Social Function Role Emotion Mental Health Strand et al. JRheum. 2005; 32: 590-601

Baseline and Mean Change Scores in SF-36 1 & 2 yrs: US301 PFI 90 80 MHI 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 ROLP ROLE 0 PAIN SOC GHP A/G Norms BL-MTX BL-LEF MTX 1yr MTX 2yr VITAL LEF 1yr LEF 2yr Strand et al. JRheum. 2005; 32: 590-601

COMET: ETN+MTX vs MTX at 1 year PF 90 p <.001 MH 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 RP p <.02 RE 10 0 BP p <.001 p values for ETN+MTX improvement SF p <.02 VT Strand et al: ARD 2012: 71:1143 50 Age/Gender Norms ETN+MTX - 52 Weeks MTX - 52 Weeks MTX - BL ETN+MTX - BL GH

RAPID 1 RCT: CZP 200 vs 400 mg at Week 52 90 PF MH 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 RP RE 0 BP SF GHP Strand et al: ARD 2011.70:996 1002 Baseline PL-Wk52 A/G Norms VT CZP200-Wk52 CZP400-Wk52

Value of Assessing HRQOL Baseline decrements in HR-QOL in RA, compared with agegender matched normative values are most evident in: PF: Physical function RP: Role physical BP: Bodily pain VT: Fatigue, pep and energy and RE: Role emotional domains regardless of ds duration A sensitive instrument to demonstrate treatment-associated changes in RA across populations with different disease durations, treatment failures and damage

Differences between SF-36 and HAQ Query different physical activities instrumental and discretionary Reflects impact of early and later disease Unlike HAQ, SF-36 does not have ceiling effects, eg irreversible impairment Largest treatment associated improvements evident in those domains with the most decrements at baseline As a generic instrument offers: Comparison with age and gender matched norms another important goal for treatment Comparisons with other disease states and co-morbidities

Value of Assessing HRQOL Patients with RA have significantly impaired HRQoL, especially in terms of physical functioning, pain, and vitality, but also in terms of their emotional state, and patients report that these facets of the disease are more important than traditional clinical measures from their perspective. The disease-related reductions in the physical and mental/emotional aspects of HRQoL are influenced by each other. Pain and fatigue are both associated with impairments in physical function and significantly impact patients HRQoL by restricting their usual activities, including social and work functions. RAPPPI included HRQOL: enjoying life again, and valued activities Kirwan JR, Hewlett SE et al: Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis-- progress at OMERACT 7. J Rheum 2005; 32: 2250-6. Carr A, Hewlett SE et al: Rheumatology outcomes: Patient s perspective J Rheum 2003: 30:880-3 Hewlett SE et al: Patients perspectives of fatigue in RA. Arth Rheum 2005; 53:697-702S Sanderson T et al: AC&R 2010: 62:640-46

% Patients Reporting Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Specific Activities ACTIVITY ERA PREMIER ABA MTX or ETN ADA+MTX MTX ABA+MTX PL+MTX BL 12m BL 24m BL 24m BL 12m BL 12m Walking 1 block 65 36 46 8 44 13 72 42 61 62 Climbing 1 flight stairs 75 43 68 12 66 21 Difficulty performing at work 90 53 89 15 88 34 42 23 57 36 Time lost at work due to health 66 9 65 18 70 32 66 46 Less time feeling tired/worn out 40 14 39 31 Less interferance on social activities 37 9 15 16 Strand and Singh Drugs 2010; 70:1-25

Correlations between PROs, DAS28, CDAI/SDAI PF domain: HAQ: -0.66, BP domain: 0.63 RP domain: RE domain: 0.63 BP domain: Pain VAS: -0.67; Global VAS: -0.66; HAQ: -0.60; PF domain: 0.63; SF domain: 0.64 VT domain: SF domain: 0.67; MH domain: 0.67; fatigue: - 0.68 VAS Pain: VAS global: 0.97; HAQ: 0.64; BP domain: -0.67; DAS28/SDAI/CDAI: 0.63 0.65 VAS Global: VAS pain: 0.97; HAQ: 0.82; BP domain: -0.66 HAQ: PF domain: -0.66, BP domain: -0.60 Strand V et al: Annals Rheum Ds 2011; 70:996 1002

Number Needed to Treat Based on % Reporting Improvements MCID in 1 6 PROs RAPID 2 RCT PROs: Pain VAS, Global VAS, HAQ, Fatigue, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS Strand V et al: Annals Rheum Ds 2011; 70:996 1002; Similar data reported for: Tofacitinib RCTs: SOLO: EULAR 2011: OP00063; SYNC: ACR 2011:Oral 2657; STANDARD: EULAR 2012: THU0151

SF-36 Domains are Independent of Each Other Based on unique questions Reflect impact of early and later disease Well defined MCID values for improvement as well as deterioration As a generic instrument offers: Comparison with age and gender matched norms an important goal for treatment, especially now! Comparisons with other disease states and co-morbidities Effect sizes are moderate to large indicating sensitive to change Well validated instrument with a wealth of data across countries and cultures; should be administered in its entirety

Value of Assessing HRQOL Measures of HR-QOL and physical function are not interchangeable in RA Individuals perceive HRQOL differently; patients report impact of their disease on function and HR-QOL differently. Assessment of HR-QOL offers multidimensional view of the impact of RA and improvements associated with effective treatment Unlike the HAQ, SF-36 does not show irreversible impairment and remains a sensitive instrument to demonstrate treatment-associated changes in RA across populations with different disease durations, treatment failures and damage

The Impact of RA on Women: Focus on Pain, Productivity and Relationships V Strand, 1 P Emery, 2 S Fleming, 3 E Coke 4 1 Stanford University School of Medicine, Portola Valley, USA; 2 University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; 3 UCB, Slough, UK; 4 Echo Research, London, UK EULAR 2010: OP0002 ACR 2010: Abstract #1063

Good Days Survey : Methods 27,459 women were recruited via an internet survey Aged 25 65 years with a formal RA diagnosis 6 months Questions: physical, emotional and social impact of RA Respondents 1,958 women with RA completed the internet survey (30 July 31 August 2009) 7 countries: UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, USA and Canada Demographics Mean age: 46 years 75% had RA diagnosed >1 year 69% reported moderate to severe RA

Daily Pain % of patients who: Experience pain on a daily basis 0 25 50 75 100 Currently take pain medication 0 25 50 75 100 Describe the type and frequency of pain you experience 0 25 50 75 100 75% of patients with moderate to severe RA and 49% with mild RA seek new pain relief solutions 63 75 87

Definition of a Good Day Which of the following defines a good day for you? Day free of pain 0 25 50 75 100 Free of fatigue, having energy 0 25 50 75 100 Able to do everyday things easily 29 0 25 50 75 100 For most, being pain-free and having energy are clear defining features of a good day 57 58