VALIDATION REPORT Ochratoxin A ELISA (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014)

Similar documents
VALIDATION REPORT (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014) AFLATOXIN B1 ELISA

VALIDATION REPORT Colistin ELISA

MYCOTOXIN PROBLEMS? NEOGEN HAS THE SOLUTIONS

Ochratoxin A In Freshly Harvested and Stored Durum and Hard Red Spring Wheat

Solutions for Mycotoxin Testing. Comprehensive Innovative Reliable

MYCOTOXIN PRODUCT LINE MULTI-RESIDUE MYCOTOXIN ANALYSIS PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTOR AUTOMATED SAMPLE CLEAN-UP IMMUNOAFFINITY SAMPLE CLEAN-UP ELISA TEST KITS

TOXIMet. Advanced, globally proven mycotoxin testing system. enhancing food safety from producer to consumer

Fusarium-toxins. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

Mycotoxins, MRL s & food chain contaminations

FOOD CONTROL SYSTEM IN HUNGARY. SAFE FOODS SEMINAR Budapest, 29-30th March 2007.

Mycotoxins: occurrence, legislation and analysis

Validation of the Total Aflatoxin ELISA test in cereals, peanut and feed.

An integrated approach to mycotoxin testing in the poultry feed chain. Bankok, March 2010

Application Note. Determination of mycotoxins with. photochemical post column derivatization. Summary. Introduction

Accurate quantification of regulated mycotoxins by UHPLC-MS/MS and screening for 200+ mycotoxins in food and feed.

Accurate Quantitation of Regulated Mycotoxins by UHPLC/MS/MS

Ochratoxin-A: Its Cancer Risk and Potential for Exposure

Mycotoxin Testing Solutions

Mycotoxins in high moisture grain silages and ensiled grain by-products

EFSA mycotoxin occurrence, data request & exposure assessment

Mycotoxin Analysis in Food and Feed

Analysis of mycotoxins in food matrices using the Agilent Ultivo Triple Quadrupole LC/MS

Mycotoxins Overview and Sampling to Testing

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX. amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels of lead in certain foodstuffs

Interested in conducting your own webinar?

RIDASCREEN FAST Peanut

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels 9 10 February Update on Fusarium mycotoxins - data from the starch industry

Development and Validation of an UPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Mycotoxins in Tobacco and Smokeless Tobacco Products

Allergen Lateral Flow IIR

From risk assessment to risk management focus on contaminants. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

Aflatoxins in Malaysian food

Aflatoxin in Milk Risk Assessment and Remediation

Risk Management of Contaminants in Herbal Substances and Herbal Preparations

Food Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Management at a European Level

New SPE Sorbent for Clean-up of Fusarium Toxin-contaminated Cereals & Cereal-based Foods, Bond Elut Mycotoxin

Mycocheck Survey 2014

Legal Requirements for the Control of Contaminants in Herbal Medicinal Products and Related Areas

Food & Feed Analysis I/2015. RIDA QUICK T-2 / HT-2 RQS our additional option for T-2 / HT-2 analysis Art. No. R5304

B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs

Results of border checks carried out by the EU Member States and Norway on imports of feed and food of non-animal origin subject to increased level

(notified under document C(2017) 4975) (Only the English text is authentic)

Mycotoxins. Natural Toxins. mycotoxins. zootoxins. bacterial toxins. plant toxins. phycotoxins

Monitoring & Surveillance Series

Detection and elimination strategies of matrix effects. in quantitative multi-target LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES ON THE WORLDWIDE MYCOTOXIN OCCURRENCE. Copyright 2010 by Erber AG. Austria. All rights reserved.

AFLATOXIN Most references to mycotoxin, unspecified, refer to Aflatoxin.

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels January 2007

Aflatoxins (sum of B1, B2, G1, G2) in cereals and cereal-derived food products 1

Increased checks on import of food of non-animal origin. Overview Controls carried out by the EU Member States. Food Safety

Guidance on the application of Commission Recommendation 2013/165/EU on the presence of T-2 and HT-2 toxin in cereals and cereal products

Development of risk-based standard on aflatoxin in peanuts

Expression analysis of Fusarium. genes involved in mycotoxin analysis. Erik Lysøe Fusarium, genes, and toxins 2008

MYCOTOXINS IN AQUACULTURE

Fate of T-2/HT-2 toxins during durum wheat processing. Occurrence of T-2/HT-2 toxins in durum wheat and pasta

All Member States were represented except Cyprus and Lithuania.

POSITION PAPER No Phthalimid: Metabolite of Folpet or unavoidable Artefact?

Allergen Lateral Flow IIR

Binders-premixture for all species of animals

UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION

Aflatoxin Contamination in Foods and Foodstuffs

GUIDANCE FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF GENERIC METHODS & METHODS OF FLEXIBLE SCOPE OF DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOODS

Mycotoxin Test Kits Agri-Screen. NeoColumn. Food Safety Online Ordering For Aflatoxin. For Aflatoxin DR (direct read)

ICGMA Report Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods Moscow, The Russian Federation 8 12 April 2013

Free-Tox. No escape THE POLYVALENT MYCOTOXIN BINDER

Risk assessment of mycotoxins: the EFSA approach. Katleen Baert Scientific officer, EFSA

Evaluation of the Daily Intake of Carcinogenic mycotoxins - Molecular evidence of synergistic effect

Overview of Mycotoxins in India with special reference to Aflatoxins. F Waliyar

B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs

Mycotoxin Analysis in Animal Feed by LC/MS/MS

Mycotoxins and Poultry Health Natacha S. Hogan

Evaluation of rapid test kits as potential screening tools for Ochratoxin A (OA) determination in wheat and barley

Food Allergen ELISA Kit

Stored Grain Toxigenic Fungi

MYCOTOXINS INCIDENCE IN WHEAT CULTURE

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX. establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food

Mycotoxin Detection & Solutions

THE VARIATION OF AFLATOXINE IN FEW FODDER AND FOOD PRODUCTS IN BRASOV COUNTY. Abstract

Official Journal of the European Union COMMISSION

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

FEED ADDITIVES FOR MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFICATION EFFICACY & AUTHORISATION

COMMENTS ON THE EXPOSURE OF OCCUPANTS TO MYCOTOXINS IN THE INDOOR ENVIRONMENT Joe Spurgeon, Ph.D. July 26, 2016

Alternative Methods for the Control of Mycotoxins

WORKING DOCUMENT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SERVICES

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Determination of Fusarium Mycotoxins in Wheat, Maize and Animal Feed Using an Online TurboFlow and Orbitrap LC/MS Method

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU)

Delegations will find attached document D048379/05.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Section Toxicological Safety of the Food chain 29 NOVEMBER 2013 AGENDA

AFLATOXIN M1 CAT. NO. 961AFLMO1M

Food & Feed Safety Kits

Application form BNN-lab approval

Chemische und Veterinäruntersuchungsämter Baden-Württemberg, Germany ORGANIC MONITORING summary report

MYCOTOXINS. Table 1. Origin of principal mycotoxins occurring in common feeds and forages. Aspergillus flavus; A. parasiticus

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Statement of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Real World-Application Methods From a Food Testing Laboratory

Extraction of Multiple Mycotoxins From Grain Using ISOLUTE Myco prior to LC-MS/MS Analysis

LC/MS/MS of Trichothecenes and Zearalenone in Wheat Using Different Sample Prep Methods

Removal of Mycotoxins during Food Processing

Transcription:

VALIDATION REPORT Ochratoxin A ELISA (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014) Beijerinckweg 18 NL-6827 BN Arnhem The Netherlands Phone: +31 26 363 0 364 info@europroxima.com

1. Introduction Ochratoxin A is a nephrotoxic and nephrocarcinogenic mycotoxin produced by Penicillium verrucosum and Penicillium viridicatum in temperate and cold climates and by a number of Aspergillus species such as A. ochraceus in warmer and tropical areas of the world [1]. Ochratoxin A has been shown to occur in various cereals and other plant products, beans and products,, and feed. In the European Union maximum levels (MLs) for ochratoxin A have been set for different food commodities. The MLs vary from 0.5 to 20 µg/kg (ppb) depending on the food type [2]. The guidance limits for feed are 250 µg/kg for cereals and cereal products and 50 and 100 µg/kg for complete and complementary feedingstuffs for pigs and poultry, respectively [3]. Maximum limits for ochratoxin A in food in the EU: Commodity ML [ppb] Commodity ML [ppb] Unprocessed cereals 5 Wine and grape juice 2 Processed cereals 3 Baby food and dietary food 0.5 Dried vine fruit 10 Pepper, nutmeg, ginger, turmeric 15 Roasted 5 Chilli, cayenne, paprika 20 Instant 10 Liquorice 20 A new ELISA for the detection of ochratoxin A was developed and validated. A new validation approach was used that complies with the Commission Regulation 519/2014 [4] for the validation of screening methods for mycotoxins. This new Regulation is specifically intended for bioanalytical methods such as ELISA and LFD. The concept of screening target concentration (STC) is used. STC is the concentration of interest for detection of the mycotoxin. For the purpose of this validation the STC was set to 2 ppb in cereals, 0.4 ppb in and must and 2.5 ppb in and cocoa. The aim of the validation was to demonstrate the fitness of purpose of the OTA ELISA as a screening method for the detection of OTA at the set STC level and higher in different commodities. The Regulation requires to determine 2 parameters: cut-off and false suspect rate. Cut-off is the concentration measured in a samples above which the sample is classified as suspect, meaning it may contain mycotoxin at a level higher than STC. Cut-off is calculated from the results obtained for 20 samples spiked at STC by using equation given in the Regulation. Another parameter that needs to be determined in the validation study is a false suspect rate. It is calculated based on the results obtained for 20 blank samples and 20 samples spiked at STC. The false suspect rate gives an estimation on how often the method will generate false suspect result. A 5% false suspect rate means that 1 sample in 20 can be wrongly classified as suspect. The lower the false suspect rate the better, as it means that fewer false suspect samples will require analysis by confirmatory method. As also advised by the Regulation, the samples should be spiked and analysed at other levels in order to determine how the method can distinguish between different mycotoxin concentrations. For the purpose of this validation the STC was set at 2 ppb in cereals, 0.4 ppb in and must and 2.5 ppb in and cocoa. Cut-off and false suspect rate were determined. The samples were also spiked with other concentrations of ochratoxin A and analysed to determine the method recovery at different levels. When available, also quality control samples and reference sample were analyzed. Additionally (not required by the Commission Regulation 519/2014), detection limit (LOD) was calculated based on 20 blank samples for each matrix tested. 2

2. Kit characteristics: see manual The reactivity pattern of the antibody. Cross- reactions: Ochratoxin A 100% Ochratoxin B 18% 3. Scope of validation The validation study was carried out with the Ochratoxin A ELISA (5121OTA). The study included: - Determination of a limit of detection (LOD) for ochratoxin A toxin in cereals (wheat and corn), : red and white, must, : roasted, instant and green, and cocoa. - Determination of cut-off and false suspect rate at screening target concentration (STC) 2 ppb for cereals, 0.4 ppb for and must, and 2.5 ppb for and cocoa. - Determination of the % recovery in cereals,, must, and cocoa. - Determination of inter- and intra-assay coefficients of variation. 4. Sample material The validation study included four to five different samples of the following non-contaminated matrices: wheat, corn, red, white, must, ground roasted, instant, green, and cocoa. 5. Sample treatment Sample preparation was performed according the manual 5121OTA[1]03.17, procedures 8.1-8.5. 6. Results For determination of LOD, cut-off and recovery samples were spiked with ochratoxin A purchased from LGC, product number B-MYC0490-5. Table 1. LOD determined for different matrices. Matrices Wheat Corn Red White Must Roasted Instant Green Cocoa LOD [ppb] 1.7 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 1.9 1.8 1.2 1.7 LOD: mean of 20 blanks + 3 x SD 3

Fig. 1. Results obtained for 20 blank samples and 20 samples spiked at standard screening concentration (STC) 2 ppb for cereals and 0.4 ppb for and must. 4

Fig. 2. Results obtained for 20 blank samples and 20 samples spiked at standard screening concentration (STC) 2.5 ppb for and cocoa. Table 2. Results of the validation study according to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014. Matrices Wheat Corn Red White Must Roasted Instant Green STC [ppb] 2 2 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Cocoa STC: Cut-off [ppb] (n=20) False suspect rate [%] Cut-off: False suspect rate: 1.8 1.9 0.3 0.3 0.2 2.5 1.9 2 1.7 <1 <1 <1 1 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 screening target concentration, the concentration of interest for the detection of ochratoxin A the concentration above which samples is classified as suspect, cut-off = mean of spiked samples 1.729 x SD (at STC) probability of false suspect samples for a calculated one-tailed t-value: t-value = (cut-off- mean blank)/sd blank 5

Table 3. Recovery [%] of ochratoxin A in cereals. Sample Wheat Corn Spiked at 2 ppb* 115.4 ± 13.6 106.5 ± 7.3 Spiked at 3 ppb** 98.7 ± 6.5 104.9 ± 5.2 Spiked at 6 ppb** 95.7 ± 4.2 95.0 ± 1.4 Reference wheat sample 3.3 ± 0.7 ppb** 101.8 ± 3.2 Reference wheat sample 9.4 ± 1.4 ppb** 95.8 ± 2.6 Reference corn sample 2.9 ± 0.4 ppb** 102.3 ± 4.2 Reference corn sample 12.3 ± 1.3 ppb** 92.0 ± 6.1 * n=20 ** n=6 Table 4. Recovery [%] of ochratoxin A in and must Sample Red White Must Spiked at 0.4 ppb* 97.1 ± 11.2 93.0 ± 14.6 89.0 ± 15.7 Spiked at 1 ppb** 97.0 ± 15.2 104.0 ± 7.6 67.6 ± 8.5 Spiked at 2 ppb** 94.4 ± 5.0 94.4 ± 7.5 93.9 ± 8.6 Spiked at 4 ppb** 87.7 ± 10.6 94.0 ± 7.3 89.5 ± 7.6 QC FAPAS white sample 2.34 ppb** 92.2 ± 3.0 QC FAPAS white sample 0.91 ppb** 113.4 ± 11.1 QC FAPAS white sample 1.23 ppb** 75.7 ± 12.0 QC FAPAS white sample 1.02 ppb** 87.6 ± 7.0 * n=20 ** n=6 6

Table 5. Recovery [%] of ochratoxin A in and cocoa. Roasted Instant Sample Green Cocoa Spiked at 2.5 ppb* 113.7 ± 8.6 98.7 ± 14.0 101.0 ± 12.7 93.8 ± 16.1 Spiked at 5 ppb** 112.3 ± 2.6 106.2 ± 2.6 104.0 ± 2.0 75.5 ± 2.8 Spiked at 10 ppb** 102.6 ± 2.5 96.0 ± 1.7 100.5 ± 3.2 78.7 ± 2.8 QC FAPAS roasted 4.87 ppb** 134.0 ± 3.2 QC FAPAS roasted 3.29 ppb** 121.3 ± 6.3 QC FAPAS green 7.53 ppb** 119.6 ± 4.5 QC FAPAS green 6.24 ppb** 97.1 ± 2.0 * n=20 ** n=6 Table 6. Inter-assay coefficient of variation for 0.125 ng/ml ochratoxin A standard. Sample Mean OD ± SD* at 450nm CV (%) 0.125 ng/ml standard 1.256 ± 0.135 10.8 *Mean of 10 results in duplicate Table 7. Intra-assay coefficient of variation for buffer spiked at 0.125 ng/ml with ochratoxin A. Sample Mean OD ± SD* at 450nm CV (%) Buffer spiked at 0.125 ng/ml 1.035 ± 0.084 8.1 *Mean of 40 samples 7. Literature 1. Kuiper-Goodman. Risk assessment of the mycotoxin Ochratoxin A. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences 1989, 2, 179-248. 2. Commission Regulation (EC) 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union L364, 1-26. 3. Commission Recommendation 2006/576/EC of 17 August 2006 on the presence of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, ochratoxin A, T-2 and HT-2 and fumonisins in products intended for animal feeding. Official Journal of the European Union L229, 7-9. 4. Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014 of 16 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 401/2006 as regards methods of sampling of large lots, spices and food supplements, performance criteria for T-2, HT-2 toxin and citrinin and screening methods of analysis. Official Journal of the European Union L147, 29-43. 7