HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES:

Similar documents
Community-based sanctions

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)


NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

Eric L. Sevigny, University of South Carolina Harold A. Pollack, University of Chicago Peter Reuter, University of Maryland

THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT: TACKLING MENTAL HEALTH FROM THE INSIDE OUT

issue. Some Americans and criminal justice officials want to protect inmates access to

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

California's incarceration rate increased 52 percent in the last 20 years.

DWI Court Research and Best Practices:

Evidence-Based Policy Options To Reduce Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs, and Crime Rates

A Public Health Approach to Illicit Drug Use in Travis County Reducing Arrests & the Costly Consequences of Harmful Drug Use

THE ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND BENEFITS OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT PROGRAMS IN GEORGIA EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

Other Models of Addictions Treatment

C.A.A.R.E. WCPA/WPLF 2016 Winter Conference 4/5/2018. Greenfield Prior to C.A.A.R.E. Cops Assisting Addiction Recovery. Greenfield Police Department

Restructuring Proposal for the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County

Criminal Justice in Arizona

Smart on Crime, Smart on Drugs

Judicially Managed Accountability and Recovery Court (JMARC) as a Community Collaborative. Same People. Different Outcomes.

MORE TREATMENT, BETTER TREATMENT AND THE RIGHT TREATMENT

FAQ: Alcohol and Drug Treatments

Criminal Justice in Arizona

NCADD :fts?new JERSEY

MENTALLY ILL OFFENDER TREATMENT AND CRIME REDUCTION ACT OF 2004: A POLICY ANALYSIS

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Grant to partially fund a Sober 24 program in Carson City from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator

Working to Reform Marijuana Laws

Crime, persistent offenders and drugs: breaking the circle A Cumberland Lodge Conference 6 8 th June 2003

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

in Indiana Detailed Analysis

Moving Beyond Incarceration For Justice-involved Women : An Action Platform To Address Women s Needs In Massachusetts

PRESENTED BY: DANNY LANGLOSS, JR. (RET.) CHIEF OF POLICE DIXON POLICE DEPARTMENT CITY MANAGER CITY OF DIXON (RET.) VICE PRESIDENT ILLINOIS

The Right Prescription for the Mentally Ill in the Texas Corrections System

Policy and interventions for adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

PART THREE AMITY OUTCOMES. A mity F oundation o

2018 NYSAC Fall Seminar Monroe County, New York

Middlesex Sheriff s Office NCSL Atlantic States Fiscal Leaders Meeting Presentation

The Effects of Drug Use on mass Incarceration

UNGALUK FUNDING PROGRAM INFORMATION

Testimony of John K. Roman Justice Policy Center Urban Institute

ORANGE COUNTY CORRECTIONS INMATE PROGRAMS

Getting Out With Nowhere to Go. The Case for Re-entry Supportive Housing

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

Criminal Justice in Arizona

Stephanie Welch, MSW Executive Officer, COMIO Office of the Secretary, Scott Kernan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)

PROSECUTION AND RACE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM MILWAUKEE S EXPERIENCE

A Public Health Approach to Illicit Drug Use

Prevention Action Alliance statement on Issue One

Why do people use drugs? Why do so many people use drugs? What should we do?

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Executive Summary. The Case for Data Linkage

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

Optum Behavioral Health Services

Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket Preliminary Outcome Evaluation. Final Report. September 2017 (Revised December 2017)

The Faces of the Opioid Crisis

The Cost of Imprisonment

Final Report*: Minimal Performance Indicators Summary Report

Addressing a National Crisis Too Many People with Mental Illnesses in our Jails

Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary

Legal and Adversarial Roles in Collaborative Courts

In January 2016, and in response to the Opiate Epidemic, Henrico County Sheriff, Michael

Lifetime Benefits and Costs of Diverting Substance Abusing Offenders from State Prison

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR. Strategic Intent YEAR PLAN

Sequential Intercept Model and Problem Solving/Specialty Courts: The Intersection with Brain Injury

Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment

OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

Blount County Community Justice Initiative

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE TREATMENT COURT BJ Jones Chief Judge and Treatment Court Judge. Who are the Oyate?

Senate Budget Testimony Remarks April 11, Assembly Budget Testimony Remarks May 6, 2019

A Dose of Evaluation:

Behavioral Health and Justice Involved Populations

DRUG COURT EXPANSION THROUGH GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY AND REFORM (GEAR)

Behind the D.C. Numbers

DESCRIPTION OF FOLLOW-UP SAMPLE AT INTAKE SECTION TWO

The Promise of DWI Courts November 14, 2013 Judge J. Michael Kavanaugh, (Ret.) Senior Director NCDC Judge Kent Lawrence, (Ret.)

Foster Dennin Page 1 AP Lang 3/1/17 Research Paper Recreational Marijuana: Yes or No?

Corrections, Public Safety and Policing

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Drug-Endangered Children How Law Enforcement, Child Protection Agencies and Schools Can Help

Jackson County Community Family Court Process, Outcome, and Cost Evaluation Final Report

Berks County Treatment Courts

Fact Sheet: Drug Data Summary

Reimagine sentencing Using our best disruptive thinking to achieve public policy goals

MENTAL HEALTH SUPPORT

Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project

Community Reentry. MLCHC Conference, May 7, 2013

Cambridgeshire Police and Crime Plan Community Safety & Criminal Justice

PRIORITY 3 BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AIM: Create a sustainable system of behavioral health care. STATE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Pathways to Crime. Female Offender Experiences of Victimization. JRSA/BJS National Conference, Portland Maine, 10/28/10

Jail Diversion Programs for Animal Abuse Offenders

Who is a Correctional Psychologist? Some authors make a distinction between correctional psychologist and a psychologist who works in a correctional f

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

Transcription:

HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES: How Increasing Funding for Alternatives to Prison Will Save Lives and Money in Wisconsin Key Findings and Recommendations November 2012

Scope of Research Year-long assessment to determine health impacts of increasing state funding for Treatment Alternative Diversion (TAD) programs to $75 million. Health Impact Assessment used hundreds of peer-reviewed studies, existing data, and focus groups with judges, offenders and others in criminal justice system. Conducted by Human Impact Partners, in collaboration with WISDOM. Included advisors from the state Public Defender s Office and the University of Wisconsin, Public Policy Institute of Community Advocates.

What is a Health Impact Assessment? Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is a combination of procedures, methods, and tools to systematically judge the potential and sometimes unintended effects of a proposed policy on the health of the population. HIA looks at the distribution of those effects within the population. HIA identifies appropriate actions to manage those effects.

Why should Wisconsin invest in treatment instead of prison? 4

Wasteful, unhealthy, ineffective, unfair Our state s incarceration rate has grown dramatically in recent decades. Wisconsin spends more than twice as much per year on Corrections as our neighbors in Minnesota, though we have similar populations. Our overuse of prisons and jails makes us less safe than we would be if we used more alternatives. Over-reliance on incarceration threatens health of individuals and families. Racial disparities in Wisconsin s prison system are among the worst in the nation.

Incarceration is costly Human price families and communities destroyed. Financial price the cost of Corrections in Wisconsin has risen from under $200 million per year in 1990 to more than $1.3 billion in 2011.

Incarceration fails to address problem 70% of Wisconsin prisoners have problems with substance abuse. More than 30% of Wisconsin prisoners have a mental health disorder or issue. Most prisoners do not have access to treatment they need. Prison tries to use criminal justice to solve a health problem and fails.

TAD can save WI taxpayers money TAD reduces cost of intervention. Average cost of incarcerating one individual for one year in Wisconsin is approximately $32,000. Average cost of even the more expensive treatment alternative is less than $8,000. TAD reduces costs of recidivism. Non-violent participants in TAD programs have lower rates of re-offending than those released from prison. Avoids criminal processing, re-incarceration, and victimization costs. 8

There are effective alternatives WI Counties have established numerous programs for managing and rehabilitating nonviolent offenders while keeping them out of prison: Drug treatment courts OWI courts Mental health courts Day report centers Universal screening

The alternatives work 1 Lower recidivism rates. Offenders in alternative programs tend to be rehabilitated and not to reoffend, while incarcerated offenders are more likely to commit another offense upon release. 2 Improve health. Treatment alternatives restore the offender to health, especially those suffering from mental illness and/or addictions.

The alternatives work (2) 3 Increase recovery rates. The success rate of drug treatment courts in keeping graduates drug-free is almost twice that of other interventions. 4 Save taxpayers a great deal of money. A Wisconsin study shows that for every $1 invested in TAD programs, the state received nearly $2 in cost savings. Other states with larger investments in treatment alternatives find even higher savings.

Do other states invest in problemsolving courts? Yes. All 50 states have established problem solving courts. 26 states increased funding for drug courts between 2007 and 2009. Georgia increased state funding for drug and mental health courts from $1 million to $11 million for FY2013. New Jersey increased state budget for drug court programs in FY2013, bringing annual total to nearly $46 million. 12

Will this approach put dangerous criminals back on the street? No. TAD eligibility is reserved for low-risk offenders. Graduates of TAD programs are less likely to commit another crime than those who are incarcerated. Shift in focus will allow law enforcement to focus resources on preventing violent crime. 13

How would $75 million for TAD impact Wisconsin? 14

Capacity: With $75 million in funding we predict 1) Thousands of TAD slots would be created. Annually, there would be: 18,000 problem-solving court slots OR 49,000 diversion programs slots OR Some mix of the two will be necessary 2) More than 3,100 state prisoners per year (out of current average of 8,000 admissions) would be eligible for problem solving court. 3) More than 21,000 jail admissions per year would be eligible for problem solving court.

For every 1 person we treat now in my county through these methods, there are 10 more who could be eligible but instead get sent to prison due to lack of resources. Treatment court judge interviewed for HIA 16

Crime & Safety: With $75 million in funding we predict 1) A 20% reduction in new crimes committed by the populations participating in TAD programs. Recidivism is typically 12% 16% lower for participants in problemsolving courts nationwide. In TAD programs, recidivism was lower for TAD completers than for those released from Wisconsin prisons. 2) Injuries resulting from crime would decrease and stress due to crime would decrease in the general population. 1 of 5 people who are convicted of a new crime after prison have been charged with committing a violent crime.

I don t steal when I m normal. But before I needed my drugs, and I needed to do what I had to do to get them I would steal whatever I could. Now that I ve been through drug treatment court, I am not going to be doing those things again. - Treatment court participant in focus group 18

Recovery: With $75 million in funding we predict All eligible low-risk offenders can receive substance abuse and mental health treatment that follows national guidelines. Therefore: 1) Rate of substance abuse recovery will increase. The success rate of drug treatment courts in keeping graduates drug free is twice that of other interventions. There will be 8 fewer people who die from drug overdose. 2) Fewer people will commit suicide or be injured. Drug and alcohol abusers and those involved in all stages of criminal justice have higher suicide rates. OWI courts reduce recidivism and therefore decrease motor vehicle fatality and injury.

For 20 years I had an addiction, heroin, crack it was known by the courts that this was the driving force behind my crimes. Not once in 3 incarcerations a total of 12 years - did I ever get treatment inside the prison walls. - Formerly incarcerated focus group participant 20

Families: With $75 million in funding we predict 1) Between 1,150 1,619 parents each year will be eligible for TAD programs and able to remain in the community. 2) There will be fewer single parent families and less involvement with Child Protective Services. Children with incarcerated parents are 4-5 times more likely to face foster system contact.

Families (2): With $75 million in funding we predict 3) Youth may be less likely to have problems if their parents are not incarcerated. 70% of young children with incarcerated mothers experience emotional or psychological problems. Youth with a parent in prison are 7 times more likely to be convicted of crimes as a young adult. 36% drop out of high school (vs. 7% of youth who do not experience parental incarceration).

I have a 24 year old daughter who doesn t know who I am. I contacted her when I started getting my life together, and her response to me was I don t know you, where were you for all the birthdays and Christmases? I don t have a relationship with my child because of incarceration. - Formerly incarcerated participant in focus group

Communities: With $75 million in funding we predict 1) 13% more non-violent offenders recovering from substance abuse will be employed. 2) For those employed, average incomes will rise. Serving time: Reduces hourly wages after prison by 11% and annual earnings by 40%. Depresses wages for black males 4.5 times more than whites. 3) Homelessness and need for transitional housing will decrease. 23% of those who are homeless or have unstable housing have a history of incarceration.

Going to prison did not help me get a job. Prison was deterrent for trying to get a job - it didn t motivate me. Prison did not give me productive feeling, it gave me animosity that triggered relapse. - Formerly incarcerated participant in focus group 25

Impact snapshot 26

Recommendations 1. Beginning in FY 2013, expand state funding of TAD programs to $75 million a year. 2. Allocate an additional $20 million per year to TAD programs statewide to improve mental health, jobs, substance abuse, and family services. 3. Redefine eligibility criteria for TAD programs to include those whose parole has been revoked, those with serious substance abuse or mental health issues, and to create a sliding risk assessment of addiction. 4. Give parents priority access to TAD program slots. 5. Continue to conduct annual standardized statewide evaluations of all problem solving courts and diversion programs with more detailed outcome measures. 27

28

For more information, please visit: WWW.PRAYFORJUSTICEINWI.ORG