Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D Bartley Dobb Professor for the Study and Prevention of Violence

Similar documents
What is the Evidence Base for Prevention in Adolescence?

Building Prevention Infrastructure for Sustainable Impact at Scale: Communities That Care

Community Assessment Training

Bach Harrison Youth Survey Results for 2006

Dallas County County Profile Report

Six Lessons Learned From Cannabis Legalization in Washington State.one researchers perspective

Sevier County Profile Report

How Well Do You Know Tompkins County Youth?

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

Conducted by International Survey Associates dba Pride Surveys

Reducing Toxic Stress and Promoting Young People s Behavioral Health: Communities That Care

Arizona Gambling Profile Report

APNA. Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Student Survey

Using Prevention Science to Create Collective Impact in Communities: Communities That Care (CTC)

Bringing Prevention to the Hospital: the Guiding Good Choices Program at Seattle Children s

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Arkansas Prevention Needs Assessment Survey

Community Assessment Report. The Prioritization of Youth Risk and Protective Factors

Validity of the Risk & Protective Factor Model

Apache County REPORT PROVIDED BY:

Unleashing the Power of Prevention: From Nothing Works to Effective Prevention

Risk and Protective Factors for Youth Marijuana Use: Preliminary Findings

Promoting Healthy Youth Development and Crime Reduction Using a Community Mobilization Process

RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ANALYSIS

Appendix D The Social Development Strategy

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. South Florida Behavioral Health Network

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Santa Rosa County

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Central Florida Behavioral Health Network

What is Behavioral Health? Overlapping Problems, Collaborative Solutions. Information Sheet 1: A Behavioral Health Lens for Prevention

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Escambia County

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2012 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Miami-Dade County

2016 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Flagler County

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Marion County Report

Evidence-based Approaches to Substance Abuse Prevention

Prevention Science and the Opioid Epidemic

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Health Risk and Protective Framework, Health Belief Model, Alternate Smoking Devices (ASD), Substance Abuse, Tobacco Prevention and Control

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Collier County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Levy County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Liberty County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Saint Johns County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Polk County Report

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Monroe County Report

Slide 1. Indiana Prevention Resource Center

2004 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

---- Suburb. Analysis by Locale Code Profile Report

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Miami-Dade County Report

2008 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Broward County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. District 3 Report

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

The Compact is a collective impact model whose partners are the Oklahoma City Public Schools, the Oklahoma City Chamber,

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Outcomes on a Statewide Prevention Model to Reduce Youth Substance Use: Evaluation of Washington State s Community Prevention and Wellness Initiative

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Preventing Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Drug Use through Life Skills Training

Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey Monroe County Report

COMMUNITY-LEVEL EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL AND PEER RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ON ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE USE

Local/Other Data (**) Concern about Risk or Protective Factor (bold) Special Concern (Cowlitz v. State Average) COMMUNITY DOMAIN RISK FACTORS.

2012 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Summary of Highlights Tompkins County Spring, 2017

2014 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Unleashing the Power of Prevention: From Nothing Works to Effective Prevention

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

The 2010 Wyoming Prevention Needs Assessment: State of Wyoming Profile Report

Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey Escambia County Report

Prevention Can Work. SELECT A TOPIC...

Welcome to the IPLAN. Prevention

Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey Polk County Report

Alcohol & Tobacco Use Among Monteverde Youth

Community Assessment Report Eagle County, Colorado, USA

Gap Analysis, Objectives and Strategy Selection for Strategic Plan Update Webinar

Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey St. Johns County Report

Alpine School District. Profile Report

From Nothing Works to Unleashing the Power of Prevention

Community-based interventions to reduce substance misuse among vulnerable and disadvantaged young people: Evidence and implications for public health

Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey Clay County Report

Scotts Bluff County. Results for Profile Report: Nebraska Risk and Protective Factor Student Survey

Risk. Factors. Children and Adolescent Substance Use. in Porter County 2016 Report

Transcription:

Washington State University Pullman, Washington January 20, 2010 Using the Research Base for Prevention Si Science to Improve Community Outcomes: Ot Communities that Care Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D Bartley Dobb Professor for the Study and Prevention of Violence Director, Social Development Research Group Kevin P. Haggerty, MSW Assistant Director, Social Development Research Group School of Social Work University of Washington www.sdrg.org

Intervention Spectrum Treatment Source: Institute of Medicine (2009). Preventing Mental, Emotional and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People. O Connell, Boat & Warner (eds.) Washington DC: National Academy Press

Prevention Science Framework Program Implementation and Evaluation Define the Problem Identify Risk and Protective Factors Interventions Problem Response

Prevention Science Research Advances Etiology of Problem Behaviors Identify risk and protective factors that predict problem behaviors and describe their distribution in populations. Efficacy Trials Design and test preventive interventions to interrupt causal processes that lead to youth problems.

Risk Factors for Adolescent Problem Behaviors Risk Factors Substance Abuse Delinquen ncy Teen Pregna ancy School Drop p-out Violence e Depression & Anxie ety Community Availability of Drugs Availability of Firearms Community Laws and Norms Favorable Toward Drug Use, Firearms, and Crime Media Portrayals of Violence Transitions and Mobility Low Neighborhood h Attachment t and Community Disorganization Extreme Economic Deprivation

Risk Factors for Young Adult Substance Misuse Risk Factors AGE Child (C) Adolescent (A) Young Adult (YA) Substance Abuse Community Availability of Drugs Availability of Firearms Community Laws and Norms Favorable Toward Drug Use, Firearms, and Crime Media Portrayals of Violence Transitions and Mobility Low Neighborhood Attachment and Community Disorganization Income, Parental Education YA YA C, YA??

Risk Factors for Adolescent Problem Behaviors Risk Factors Substance Abuse Delinque ency Teen Preg gnancy School Dro op-out Violen ce Depressi on & Anx xiety Family Family History of the Problem Behavior Family Management Problems Family Conflict Favorable Parental Attitudes and Involvement in the Problem Behavior

Risk Factors for Young Adult Substance Misuse Risk Factors AGE Child (C ) Adolescent (A) Young Adult (YA) Substance Abuse Family Family History of Substance Use Family Management Problems Family Conflict Favorable Parental Involvement in Substance Use C, A C, A C, A,YA C, A

Risk Factors for Adolescent Problem Behaviors Risk Factors Substanc e Abuse Delinqu uency Teen Pre egnancy School Drop-Out Viole ence Depression & Anxiety School Academic Failure Beginning in Late Elementary School Lack of Commitment to School

Risk Factors for Young Adult Substance Misuse Risk Factors AGE Child (C) Adolesce ent (A) Young Adu ult (YA) Substance Abuse School Academic Failure Beginning in Late Elementary School C,A,YA Lack of Commitment to School A

Risk Factors for Adolescent Problem Behaviors Risk Factors Substance Abuse Delinquen ncy Teen Pregn ancy School Drop p-out Violence e Depressio n & Anxiety Individual/Peer Early and Persistent t Antisocial i Behavior Rebelliousness Friends Who Engage in the Problem Behavior Favorable Attitudes Toward the Problem Behavior Early Initiation of the Problem Behavior Constitutional Factors

Risk Factors for Young Adult Substance Misuse Risk Factors AGE Child (C) Adolescent (A) Young Adult (YA) Substance Abuse Individual/Peer Early and Persistent t Antisocial i Behavior Internalizing C,A,YA C,A Friends who Engage in Substance Use Favorable Attitudes Toward Substance Use Early Initiation of Substance Use Adolescent Substance Use Constitutional Factors A,YA C,A,YA C A C

Risk Factors for Young Adult Substance Misuse Risk Factors AGE Child (C) Adolescent (A) Young Adult (YA) Substance Abuse Individual/Peer Not Living i with Parents, Spouse Being Unmarried YA YA Unemployment or Working Long Hours College Attendance YA YA

Protective Factors Individual Characteristics High Intelligence Resilient Temperament Competencies and Skills In each social domain (family, school, peer group and neighborhood) Positive Opportunities Reinforcement for Positive Involvement Bonding* Healthy lh Beliefs and dclear Standards* d* * Also predictors of young adulthood substance use, unknown for other protective factors

The Social Development Strategy The Goal Healthy Behaviors for all children and youth Start with Build Healthy Beliefs and Clear Standards Bonding Attachment Commitment in families, schools, and peer groups to families, schools, and peer groups By providing Opportunities Skills Recognition in families, schools, and peer groups Be Aware of Individual Characteristics

Prevalence of 30 Day Alcohol Use by Number of Risk and Protective Factors 100% Six State Student Survey of 6th-12th Graders, Public School Students Pr revalence 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 to 1 2 to 3 4 to 5 6 to 7 8 to 9 10+ Number of Risk Factors Number of Protective Factors 0 to 1 2 to 3 4 to 5 6to7 8 to 9

Prevalence of Attacked to Hurt By Number of Risk and Protective Factors 60% 50% Prevalenc ce 40% 30% 20% Protection, Level 0 Protection, Level 1 Protection, Level 2 Protection, Level 3 Protection, Level 4 10% 0% Risk, Level 0 Risk, Level 1 Risk, Level 2 Risk, Level 3 Risk, Level 4

Prevalence of Other Problems by Number of Risk Factors 50 40 % 30 20 10 depressive symptomatology deliberate self harm homelessness early sexual activity 0 0-1 2-3 4-6 7-9 >=10 Risk factors Bond, Thomas, Toumbourou, Patton, and Catalano, 2000

Number of School Building Level Risk Factors and Probability of Meeting Achievement Test Standard (10 th Grade Students) Probability of Meeting Standard 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Number of Risk Factors Arthur et al., 2006 Math Reading Writing

Prevention Science Research Advances Etiology of Problem Behaviors Identify risk and protective factors that predict problem behaviors and describe their distribution in populations. Efficacy Trials Design and test preventive interventions to interrupt t causal processes that t lead to youth problems.

Wide Ranging Approaches Have Been Found To Be Effective in Childhood and Adolescence 1. Prenatal & Infancy Programs 2. Early Childhood Education 3. Parent Training i 4. After-school Recreation 5. Mentoring with Contingent Reinforcement 6. Youth Employment with Education 7. Organizational Change in Schools (Hawkins & Catalano, 2004) 8. Classroom Organization, Management, and Instructional Strategies 9. School Behavior Management Strategies 10. Classroom Curricula for Social Competence Promotion 11. Community & School Policies 12. Community Mobilization

But Prevention approaches that do not work or have not been evaluated have been more widely used than those shown to be effective. (Gottfredson et al 2000, Hallfors et al 2000, Hantman et al 2000, Mendel et al 2000, Silvia et al 1997; Smith et al 2002)

Challenges for States and Communities in Using Prevention Science Matching tested, effective programs to local need Tested, effective programs/systems compete with best best, usual, or new practice Tested, effective programs require training, technical assistance, and monitoring to be delivered with fidelity Achieving population wide outcomes

Communities That Care Model for Achieving the Vision of Science Informing Practice Providing the skills and tools for decision making Education and tools to empower communities to become advocates for tested, effective programs to meet their needs Developed over the last 20 years through collaboration with community members

The Communities That Care Operating System Get Started Community readiness assessment. Identification of key individuals, stakeholders, and organizations. Implement and Evaluate Creating Communities That Care Get Organized Create a Plan Develop a Profile

The Communities That Care Operating System Get Started Training key leaders and dboard in CTC Building the community coalition. Implement and Evaluate Creating Communities That Care Get Organized Create a Plan Develop a Profile

The Communities That Care Operating System Get Started Implement and Evaluate Creating Communities That Care Collect risk/protective factor Get Organized and outcome data. Construct a community profile from the data. Create a Plan Develop a Profile

The CTC Youth Survey Tool Helps Match Need to Tested, Effective Programs Identifies levels of 21 risk and 9 protective factors and academic and behavioral outcomes Guides planners to select tested, effective actions Monitors the effects of chosen actions

The Communities That Care Operating System Get Started Implement and Define outcomes. Prioritize risk factors to be Evaluate targeted. Select tested, effective interventions. Create action plan. Develop evaluation plan. Creating Communities That Care Get Organized Create a Plan Develop a Profile

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% School A 2005 Risk Profile Community Family School Peer-Individual Total Percentage of Youth at Ri isk Low Neighborhood d Attachment Community Disorganization Laws & Norms Favor Drug Use Perceived Availability of Drugs Perceived Availability of Handguns Poor Family Management Family Conflict Family History of Antisocial Behavior Parent Attitudes Favorable to ASB Parent Attitudes Favor Drug Use Academic Failure Low Commitment to School Rebelliousness Early Initiation of ASB Early Initiation of Drug Use Attitude Favorable to ASB Attitude Favorable to Drug Use Perceived Risk of Drug Use Interaction with Antisocial Peers Friends' Use of Drugs Rewards for ASB Depressive Symptoms Intention to Use Drugs Gang Involvement Total Risk Schenectady High School

Protective Factors Risk Factor Addressed Rebelliousness Program Strategy Healthy Beliefs & Clear Standards Bonding Opport. Skills Recog. Developmental Period Family Therapy 6-14 Classroom Curricula for Social Competence Promotion 6-14 School Behavior Management Strategies 6-14 Individual l/peer Doma ain Friends Who Engage in the Problem Behavior Favorable Attitudes Toward the Problem Behavior Early Initiation of the Problem Behavior Afterschool Recreation 6-10 Mentoring with Contingent Reinforcement 11-18 Youth Employment with Education 15-18 Parent Training 6-14 Classroom Curricula for Social Competence Promotion 6-14 Afterschool Recreation 6-14 Mentoring with Contingent Reinforcement 11-18 Classroom Curricula for Social Competence Promotion Community/School Policies 6-14 Parent Training i 614 6-14 Classroom Organization Management and Instructional Strategy 6-10 Classroom Curricula for Social Competence 6-14 Community/School Policies all Constitutional Factors Prenatal/Infancy Programs prenatal-2 1998 Developmental Research and Programs

Classroom Curricula for Social and Emotional Competence Promotion Middle and High School The Life Skills Training Program (Botvin et al., 1995) Project Alert Drug Prevention Curriculum (Ellickson et al., 1993; Ellickson and Bell, 1990) Alcohol Misuse Prevention (Maggs et al., 1998) Towards No Drug Use (Sussman et al. 2003; 2003)

Form task forces. Identify and train implementers. Sustain collaborative relationships. Evaluate processes and outcomes for programs annually. Evaluate community outcomes every two years. Adjust programming. The Communities That Care Operating System Tools for Decision Making Get Started Implement and Evaluate v Creating Communities That Care Get Organized Create a Plan Develop a Profile

Decrease in problem behaviors Increase in protective factors Decrease in risk factors Changes in participant knowledge, attitudes, skills or behavior Program implementation fidelity Community Plan Implementation Training 1-9

Decrease in problem behaviors Increase in protective factors Decrease in risk factors Changes in participant knowledge, attitudes, skills or behavior Program implementation fidelity (10 to 15 years) (3 to 10 years) (1 to 4 years) (6 months to 2 years) Community Plan Implementation Training 1-10

Evidence of Effectiveness of CTC from Community Youth Development Study A 24 Community Randomized Trial PI: J. David Hawkins Co-PI: Richard F. Catalano I: Kevin P. Haggerty Funded d in 2003 by: National Institute on Drug Abuse Center for Substance Abuse Prevention National Cancer Institute t National Institute on Child Health and Development National Institute on Mental Health

Communities That Care Theory of Change CTC Training and Technical Assistance (Brown et al, 2007) Adoption of Science-based Prevention Framework Collaboration Regarding g Prevention Issues (Quinby et al, 2008; Fagan et al., 2008) Appropriate Choice and Implementation Decreased Risk and of Tested, Effective Enhanced Protection ti Prevention Programs & Adoption of Social Development Strategy as Community s Way of Positive Youth Bringing Up Children Outcomes

CTC Tools Assisted Community Coalitions to Prioritize Risk Factors Family management problems Parental attitudes favorable to problem behavior Family conflict Low commitment to school Academic failure Favorable attitudes toward problem behavior Friends who engage in problem behavior Rebelliousness Laws and norms favorable toward drug and alcohol use

CTC Changed Prioritized Risk Factors Community-wide of Risk Avera age Level 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00-0.05-0.10-0.15 015-0.20 Grade 5 Grade 7 5th Control Communities 7th CTC Communities Hawkins et al., 2008 Note. Values are model-fitted levels of standardized average risk for students in the Youth Developmental Study panel sample. Nonsignificant difference in means at Grade 5, t (11) = 0.61, p >.05. Significant difference in means at Grade 7, t (11) = -3.13, p =.01.

Communities That Care Theory of Change CTC Training and Technical Assistance Adoption of Science-based Prevention Framework Collaboration Regarding g Prevention Issues Appropriate Choice and Implementation Decreased Risk and of Tested, Effective Enhanced Protection ti Prevention Programs & Adoption of Social Development Strategy as Community s Way of Positive Youth Bringing Up Children Outcomes

Effects of CTC on Onset of Drug Use and Delinquency Onset of substance use and delinquency between grade 6 and 8: Alcohol use* Cigarette smoking* Smokeless tobacco use* Marijuana use Other illicit drug use Delinquent behavior* Among 5 th grade students who had not yet initiated. *=Significant at p<.05 Hawkins et al., in press.

Effects of CTC on Current Drug Use and Delinquency in the Panel Alcohol use* Binge drinking* Tobacco Use* Delinquency* *=significant ifi at p<.05 Hawkins et al., in press.

Prevalence of Binge Drinking in Past Two Weeks In Panel In Control and CTC Communities 25.00 20.00 Percenta age 15.00 10.00 500 5.00 0.00 9.0 p <.05 5.7 1.3 ns 1.0 Grade 5 Grade 8 Controls CTC Note. Observed rates averaged across 40 imputations. ns = nonsignificant. N = 4407.

Communities That Care is owned by the federal government and is available at: http://preventionplatform.samhsa.gov/ NIDA Town Hall Meeting on CTC http://www.visualwebcaster.com/event.asp?id=61945 Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Contact: Patricia Getty, Ph.D. Acting Director, Division of Systems Development Center for Substance Abuse Prevention patricia.getty@samhsa.hhs.gov v

Summary and Implications There is evidence that we can advance public health and achieve population wide outcomes in our communities by using CTC Risk and protective factors for young adulthood substance misuse overlap with those for adolescents. Unique risk factors in young adulthood d also identified There are tested effective prevention programs for young adulthood. Using CTC C to prevent young adult substance misuse will require modifications

CTC Modifications for Young Adults Modification of youth survey to capture relevant child, adolescent and young adult risk and protective factors Development of normative data base and comparative display for risk and protective factors Development of Prevention Strategies Guide for young adulthood Development of tools for monitoring of fidelity and outcomes in routine program delivery

Candice they can meet in Rico s office. Washington State University Pullman, Washington January 20, 2010 Using the Research Base for Prevention Si Science to Improve Community Outcomes: Ot Communities that Care Richard F. Catalano, Ph.D Bartley Dobb Professor for the Study and Prevention of Violence Director, Social Development Research Group Kevin P. Haggerty, MSW Assistant Director, Social Development Research Group School of Social Work University of Washington www.sdrg.org