Margaret Schenkman, PT, PhD, FAPTA University of Colorado, Denver Colorado
Present a framework for clinical reasoning with emphasis on Patient centered care Application of enablement and disablement frameworks Clinical reasoning for evaluation Application of both reasoning and evidence to make decisions Illustrate with an individual who has PD
Physical therapy focuses on enhancing the patient s ability to function and participate within society The physical therapist Is attentive to the patient s needs, concerns and lifestyle Addresses those concerns and needs within the plan of care
Participation: involvement in a life situation Participation takes place In the home: Example: take care of the household On the job: Example: work in a coffee bar In leisure activities Example: vacation at the beach
Requires ability to carry out related functional activities Activity: execution of a task or action by an individual Some functional activities related to vacationing at the beach Carrying luggage Climbing steps onto train Walking on moving train, side walks, sand
Purpose To indentify relationships between difficulties that individuals have in their lives and disease processes Types of approaches Disablement Begins with the disease Identifies the resulting problems Relates them to function Enablement Begins with the person s life and participation Identifies the reasons for abilities and difficulties (including but not limited to disease processes)
Modified from Schenkman, Deutsch, Gill Body Phys Ther, 2006
Individual with Early Stage PD Mr. C 88 years old Still involved as president of a heating company Went to office every day Reported reduced energy, slowing down, didn t feel stable when walking Described painful knees (long standing osteoarthritis)
From enablement perspective Learn about the patient s participation and roles, desired functional activities, and skills & resources From disablement perspective Analyze impact of the patient s disease/ pathology on functional activities Make reasoned decisions regarding what can improve with physical intervention and what cannot
Patient centered perspective Why seeking treatment Needs for participation and function Context (living environment, job, leisure activities) Family issues Disease related perspective Medical history Likely contributing impairments from primary disorder and other conditions
Administer tests and measures that will Describe movement problem for important functional activities Guide evaluation Serve as outcome measures Meaningful to patient Relevant environmental context Takes into account Activities, participation, quality of life (enablement) Resources (enablement) Impairments (disablement)
Person Stationary Moving Stationary Moving Environment Stationary Stationary Moving Moving Adapted from Gentile In Shumway-Cook and Wollacott
Tremor Rigidity Minimal (controlled with medication) Bradykinesia Minimal in left hand (controlled with medication) Overall slowness of movement Postural instability Loss of balance with posterior pull
Based on postural instability, test for sensory impairments: Diminished vibratory sense ankle, foot Rhomberg test demonstrates instability Clinical Test for Sensory Interaction in Balance (CTSIB) demonstrates visual dependence
Identify Hypothesize Improve, compensate or prevent Consider prognosis How impairments, task and environment contribute to functional difficulties For function and impairments, consider whether to Resources and limitations For each contributing condition Determine realistic goals and plan of care
Enablement: resources Highly motivated Stable family Financial resources Physiological Cardiovascular Integument Disablement: limitations Identified by patient Painful knees Slowness Instability Identified by P.T. Bradykinesia from PD Lack of axial range of motion/flexibility Diminished vibratory sense with visual dependence
Functional limitations instability, slowness and pain Postural instability Primary problem of PD, ROM, postural alignment, vibratory sense, sensory/motor interaction Slowness for all functions Bradykinesia, pain, ROM, postural instability Pain Osteoarthritis
IMPROV E FUNCTION
PREVENT COMPENSAT E IMPAIRMENTS IMPROVE
PREVEN T PATHOLOGY
Disorder Parkinson s disease Tremor predominant versus Postural Instability Gait Disorder (PIGD) Age, dementia Comorbid conditions Osteoarthritis Age and PD surgical risk Post et al, 2007
PD Specific impairments Sequelae Bradykinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability Flexibility Balance/stability Co-morbid conditions Painful knees Sensory processing/stability Schenkman et al, 2000; Schenkman et al, 2006 Shumway-Cook, Wollacott, 2001
Prognosis for change with exercise Prognosis for this patient (evidence and clinical experience) Bed mobility Sit to stand Mobility Walking Electric scooter Fatigue Goodwin et al, 2008
Improve Compensate for Task performance (e.g., sit to stand, gait) Stability & endurance Painful knees (e.g., higher chair seat) Bradykinesia (e.g.; rhythmic auditory stimulation) Prevent Further loss of range of motion Falls and fractures, Pneumonia
Overall exercise program: similar program of Ellis et al., 2005 To maintain range of motion To improve stability Flexibility exercise Balance training within function; specific training on different surfaces To compensate for Bradykinesia Rhythmic auditory stimulation
The Plan of Care should lead to improvements of function and participation Both enablement and disablement perspectives guide decisions Evidence is used, combined with reasoning based on the patient s actual situation Prognosis is taken into account for both the primary and co-morbid conditions Evidence for possible intervention choices next presentation!
Ellis T, et al. Efficacy of a physical therapy program in patients with Parkinson s disease: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:626-632 Goodwin VA, et al. The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord. 2008 Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967;17:427-442. Post B, Markus MP et al. Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson s disease: A systematic review. Mov Disord 2007;22:1839-1851 Samii A, et al. Parkinson s disease. The Lancet 2004;363:1783-1793 Schenkman M, Deutsch J, Gill-Body K. An Integrated Framework for Decision Making in Neurological Physical Therapy Practice. Phys Ther 2006;86;1681-1702 Schenkman M, et al. Spinal flexibility and physical performance of communitydwelling adults with and without Parkinson s disease. J Gerontol MS, 2000;55A:M441-445 Schenkman M, et al. Relationships between mobility of the axial structures and physical performance. Phys Ther. 76:276-285, 1996 Shumway-Cook A, Wollacott M. Motor Control. Theory and Practical Applications. Second Edition, Lippencott Williams & Wilkins, 2001