PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant.

Similar documents
GAIL R. ROUTH. Plaintiff

LORRAINE SWATY. Plaintiff,

KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, WASHINGTON STATE CAUSE NO SEA

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

U.S. District Court District of Delaware (Wilmington) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv KAJ

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY. ************************************* James Harrell, et al., * Lead Case No.: 24X Plaintiffs, *

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO. and

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Parent/Student Rights in Identification, Evaluation, and Placement

There are two clear messages, behind which the entire public health community stands united, to be taken from this groundbreaking new report:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

If you sought health insurance coverage or benefits from MAGNETIC STIMULATION ( TMS )

Case: 3:17-cv wmc Document #: 1 Filed: 11/01/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Judicial conflict between Bristol-Myers Squibb Co V. Merck & Co Inc. Keytruda V. Opdivo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

effect that the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ( FSPTCA ), which was

CHERYL McGAULEY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of WALTER L. McGAULEY, SR.,

STATE OF NEW JERSEY BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION. Docket No. CO SYNOPSIS

Lawsuits Challenging the FDA s Deeming Rule

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 2:14-cv Document 1 Filed 12/17/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTEN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

THE OPIOID CRISIS: UPDATE ON OPIOID-RELATED LITIGATION. Orange County Board of County Commissioners November 13, 2018

AUGUST 2007 LAW REVIEW LEAD PAINT PLAYGROUND HAZARD EVIDENCE

Case 1:17-cv ECF No. 1 filed 10/26/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/06/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 69 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/06/2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC

Cancer case hinges on Hardell testimony Jeffrey Silva

Case 1:09-cv WWC -MCC Document 607 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Case 2:12-cv KJM-GGH Document 1 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. (Sacramento Division)

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 1 Filed 06/14/16 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F JAMES SKINKIS, Employee. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier

Negligent Injection Medical Malpractice Negligent Treatment Medical Malpractice Informed Consent

DATE: March 28, 2001 M E M O R A N D U M. Directors of Special Education. Gordon M. Riffel Deputy Superintendent Special Education Unit

The United States Government s Racketeering Lawsuit against the Cigarette Industry

Department of Justice Racketeering Case: Tobacco Cos. Ordered to Publish Corrective Statements. November 17, 2017

2:12-cv VAR-LJM Doc # 1 Filed 08/02/12 Pg 1 of 12 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

ACLU of Pennsylvania ~ Clean Air Council Delaware Riverkeeper Network

Objection! How Consumer Class Actions are Challenging Natural Labeling

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 1 HOUSE BILL 933. Short Title: Informed Consent for HIV/AIDS Testing. (Public)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA KENNETH KNIGHT IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED STATEMENT OF CLAIM

Case 1:15-cv RBJ Document 1 Filed 02/09/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. ( OAI ) answers and asserts its affirmative

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GENERAL JURISDICTION AND COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

Argued telephonically October 3, 2017 Decided November 14, 2017

Applications of Genomics to Toxic Torts

CSA Briefing Note Regarding Joint Application against the University and Re-Commencing Collection of CFS/CFS-O Fees

Plaintiff, Comfort Dental Group, Inc. ( Comfort Dental ), by its attorneys, MOYE WHITE LLP, states: INTRODUCTION

MEALEY S TM California Section Report. A commentary article reprinted from the March 2014 issue of Mealey s California Section Report

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Litigation Update

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT DIVISION II CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-CI Electronically Filed

Case 3:99-cv SRU Document 497 Filed 08/26/11 Page 1 of 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

The Tobacco Control Act: Legal Issues in 2013 and Beyond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW APPEALS BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1832

Reversing the Opioid Epidemic

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

The Validity of Repressed Memories as Evidence. shuts them out, but then is able to recollect memories of them years later? Repressed memory, or

Supreme Court of Florida

Case: 2:10-cv EAS-MRA Doc #: 93 Filed: 01/25/11 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 1888

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

United States District Court

UPDATES TO CALIFORNIA PROPOSITION 65 GUIDELINES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED CANNABIS CORPORATION. Plaintiff, PURE HEMP COLLECTIVE INC.

Smoking Harm Reduction: If Not Now When?

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Case No.: Plaintiffs Tammie Aust, Alison Grennan, Jennifer Schill, and Lang You Mau, by and

Case MDL No Document 134 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED JANUARY 19, 2005

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Case No.: COMPLAINT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

The Supreme Court Revisits the Preemption of State Law Consumer Protection Claims October 6, 2008

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed October 14, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clayton County, Richard D.

Scientific Exchange: What Every Compliance Officer Should Consider

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BALDWIN COUNTY, ALABAMA

Case 3:11-cv JAH-NLS Document Filed 08/13/12 Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case 1:04-cv RPM Document 16 Filed 01/10/2007 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Case 3:10-cr ARC Document 137 Filed 12/09/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

I. Why It Made the List

Illinois Supreme Court. Language Access Policy

CASE INFORMATION SHEET FLORIDA LEGAL PERIODICALS, INC. P.O. Box 3370, Tallahassee, FL (904) /(800) * FAX (850)

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/22/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/22/2016

Case 1:14-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Case MDL No Document 392 Filed 07/31/18 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

CITY ATTORNEY DENNIS HERRERA NEWS RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR DEFAMATION

Transcription:

PHILIP R. KIMBALL, as Administrator of the Estate of CARLA M. KIMBALL, Deceased, Plaintiff, vs. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case No. CV03-0664 Judge James L. Robart May 1, 2006 BACKGROUNDER

PURPOSE The purpose of this backgrounder is to provide a concise reference document on this case. It is not a court document. THE PLAINTIFF Plaintiff Philip Kimball filed this lawsuit on January 7, 2003 in the Watcom County Superior Court for the State of Washington. R.J. Reynolds removed the case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 14, 2003. Mr. Kimball is the spouse of the late Carla Kimball. Mrs. Kimball smoked cigarettes from the 1960s until she quit smoking in 1990. During the time that she smoked, Mrs. Kimball smoked Winston and Winston Lights 100 s, which are manufactured by R.J. Reynolds. Mrs. Kimball was diagnosed with cancer in 2000 and died on March 12, 2001 at the age of 54. Plaintiff brought the lawsuit as the administrator of Mrs. Kimball s estate. He alleges that Mrs. Kimball died from lung cancer and claims that Mrs. Kimball s lung cancer was caused by smoking Winston and Winston Lights cigarettes manufactured by R.J. Reynolds. Plaintiff originally brought claims for fraud, conspiracy, negligence and products liability. The Court dismissed plaintiff s fraud and conspiracy claims earlier in the case, and trial will concern only the negligence and products liability claims. The plaintiff is represented by Jon Ferguson of The Jon Ferguson Law Group, PLLC, located on Bainbridge Island, Washington. THE DEFENDANT R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company is the nation s second largest manufacturer of

cigarettes. R.J. Reynolds is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reynolds American Inc., and is headquartered in Winston-Salem, N.C. Its major brands include Winston, Camel, Kool, PALL MALL, Salem and Doral. R.J. Reynolds is represented by Mark Belasic and Dennis Murphy of the Cleveland office of Jones Day, and by Brad Keller of Byrnes and Keller in Seattle, Washington. TRIAL SITE The case will be tried in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, located at 700 Stewart Street, Seattle, Washington. JUDGE The Honorable James L. Robart is the trial judge. EXPECTED DURATION Jury selection is scheduled to begin on May 1, 2006. The Court has established the last day of trial as May 17, 2006. JURY AND VERDICT The jury will initially consist of nine jurors. The number of jurors may not fall below six. For plaintiff to prevail, all remaining jurors must reach a unanimous decision. PLAINTIFF S CASE This is a tobacco product liability lawsuit. The plaintiff alleges that Carla Kimball developed lung cancer, and died as a result of smoking Winston and Winston Lights 100 s cigarettes manufactured by R.J. Reynolds. The plaintiff filed his original complaint on January 7, 2003, and filed an amended complaint on May 29, 2003. The remaining causes of action are: negligence and product liability. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of damages. DEFENDANT S CASE

R.J. Reynolds contends that the plaintiff s remaining claims for negligence and product liability fail for several reasons. First, they are preempted in whole or in part by the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. Second, there is substantial evidence that Mrs. Kimball was long aware of the potential health risks of smoking, and in choosing to begin and continue smoking, Mrs. Kimball voluntarily assumed those risks. Evidence will also be presented that the potential health risks of smoking have been common knowledge in the communities in which Mrs. Kimball lived since long before she chose to smoke. Third, the plaintiff has no evidence that, at any time during the time that Mrs. Kimball smoked, there was a feasible, safer, alternative cigarette design that Mrs. Kimball would have used and that would have prevented her cancer. Fourth, evidence will be presented that Mrs. Kimball could and, in fact, did quit smoking approximately ten years prior to being diagnosed with cancer. The plaintiff s claims also require that he prove that Mrs. Kimball had lung cancer, and that her lung cancer and death were caused by smoking R.J. Reynolds cigarettes. R.J. Reynolds disputes whether the plaintiff will be able to prove these elements of his case. In fact, the evidence will show that even one of Mrs. Kimball s own doctors questioned whether her cancer was caused by smoking PROCEDURAL HISTORY The plaintiff filed suit on January 7, 2003, but did not serve R.J. Reynolds until February 14, 2003. R.J. Reynolds timely removed this action to the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on March 14, 2003, on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. The plaintiff did not challenge federal jurisdiction. The case originally was assigned to Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. R.J. Reynolds moved to dismiss the complaint in March of 2003. Judge Rothstein denied Reynolds motion on May 14, 2003. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on May 29, 2003, which R.J. Reynolds answered. In August 2003, the case was reassigned to Chief Judge John C. Coughenour. The parties undertook discovery, and the case was transferred, in August 2004, to Judge James L. Robart. Discovery was completed and, in December 2004, R.J. Reynolds filed a motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of all of the plaintiff s claims as a matter of law. On February 25, 2005, Judge Robart granted

R.J. Reynolds motion in part and denied it in part. Judge Robart dismissed the plaintiff s fraud and civil conspiracy claims, finding that there was no evidence to support such claims. He allowed the plaintiff s negligence and product liability claims to proceed to trial. A trial date of January 23, 2006, originally was set. At the request of the plaintiff s attorney, the Court changed the trial date to May 3, 2006. During the Final Pretrial Conference held on April 17, 2006, the Court changed the start of the trial to May 1, 2006. Jury selection begins on May 1, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. Opening statements are scheduled to begin on May 2, 2006.