Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses: multiplicative model for SESLHD

Similar documents
Initial analysis of newly added data items. Do they provide insights of value?

Comparative Study on Three Algorithms of the ICD-10 Charlson Comorbidity Index with Myocardial Infarction Patients

Outcomes of rehabilitation for reconditioning: falls, frailty, care service requirements - what does the national data tell us?

Research in Real Life. Real Life Effectiveness of Aclidinium Bromide. Version Date: 26 September 2013

Comparison of Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries Treated in Ambulatory Surgical Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments

University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research

Supplementary Online Content

AROC Reports for Any Health Fund (AHF) January December 2004

Technical appendix: The impact of integrated care teams on hospital use in North East Hampshire and Farnham

Health professionals' experiences of advance care planning in palliative care service

Falls in older people are a major concern

Victoria: patient outcomes in palliative care: July - December 2013: report 16

Victoria: patient outcomes in palliative care: January - June 2014: report 17

Subacute inpatient rehabilitation across a range of impairments: intensity of therapy received and outcomes

Accuracy of the Charlson Index Comorbidities Derived from a Hospital Electronic Database in a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia

The cost of hospital-acquired complications for older people with and without dementia; a retrospective cohort study

Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care

Fall-related injury in people with dementia

The cost of hospital-acquired complications for older people with and without dementia; a

Rates and patterns of participation in cardiac rehabilitation in Victoria

Development of the Australian national subacute and non acute patient classification version 4 final report

Agreement between medical record and ICD-10-AM coding of mental health, alcohol and drug conditions in trauma patients

Doing something about quality

Limitations of the HRG Tariff: The trim point

Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care

Long-stay patients methodology Published by NHS England and NHS Improvement

Pattern of Comorbidities among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Spain

National Bowel Cancer Audit. Detection and management of outliers: Clinical Outcomes Publication

Why is co-morbidity important for cancer patients? Michael Chapman Research Programme Manager

Why is co-morbidity important for cancer patients? Di Riley Associate Director Clinical Outcomes Programme

Surgical Outcomes: A synopsis & commentary on the Cardiac Care Quality Indicators Report. May 2018

Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration: the challenges of developing a national data set collection

AROC v4 AN SNAP Explained

Hospital Standardised Mortality Rate

Chronic Illness Resource Usage

Case studies: palliative care in Vital Signs 2014: The State of Safety and Quality in Australian Health Care

Improving documentation and coding of malnutrition a five year journey

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Public Health Sciences

Objectives. Medicare Spending per Beneficiary: Analyzing MSPB Data to Identify Primary Drivers

Weight loss surgery in Australia Australian hospital statistics

The Australian National Subacute and Non acute Patient Classification. AN SNAP V4 User Manual

Stratification Variables

Can the categorization of patients with life-limiting conditions help us to

Risk of Fractures Following Cataract Surgery in Medicare Beneficiaries

Additional costs of inpatient malnutrition, Victoria, Australia,

Fall-related injury profile for Victorians aged 65 years and older Voula Stathakis, Shannon Gray & Janneke Berecki-Gisolf

Breathlessness is not a normal part of aging: Development and testing of asthma awareness messages for older Australians

Appendix Identification of Study Cohorts

Improving health service delivery through telehealth expansion in Queensland

National Report on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care in Australia

National Report on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care in Australia

APR DRG Data Discovery

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARD FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

Engaging stakeholders in prioritising and addressing evidence-practice gaps in maternal health care

Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Geriatrics Commons, and the Nutrition Commons

Cost-of-illness analysis in the EGB database

Bayesian Estimation of a Meta-analysis model using Gibbs sampler

The relationship between quality of care and hospital costs in Europe. Unto Häkkinen and EuroDRG teams in Finland, France, Germany, Spain and Sweden

NQF-ENDORSED VOLUNTARY CONSENSUS STANDARDS FOR HOSPITAL CARE. Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

TECHNICAL NOTES APPENDIX SUMMER

Australian, Finland and South Africa - Delving into Data to Investigate Differences in Stroke Rehabilitation

Measure Information Form Collected For: CMS Outcome Measures (Claims Based)

Policy Brief June 2014

Episodes of Care Risk Adjustment

Unplanned admission to the intensive care unit in the very elderly and risk of in-hospital mortality

Cancer Services Performance Indicators. Round Report

Technical Appendix for Outcome Measures

"I hope this can be shared with everyone in lots of schools": A novel intervention to improve social skills of peers of children with autism

Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care

Arkansas Health Care Payment Improvement Initiative COPD Algorithm Summary

TEMPLATE CASE REPORT FORM. Rapid Response Pharmacovigilance in Palliative Care

Appendix. Potentially Preventable Complications (PPCs) identify. complications that can occur during an admission. There are 64

A Framework for Optimal Cancer Care Pathways in Practice

THE NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL

TENNCARE Bundled Payment Initiative: Description of Bundle Risk Adjustment for Wave 8 Episodes

State of ICD 11. Robert Jakob, WHO

Venous Leg Ulcers: Wound Risk Assessment and Prevention. Prof. Helen Edwards, OAM

APPENDIX EXHIBITS. Appendix Exhibit A2: Patient Comorbidity Codes Used To Risk- Standardize Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates page 10

Increasing health care costs and a political movement toward balancing the budget

TECHNICAL NOTES APPENDIX SUMMER

Cambia Palliative Care Metrics: Where are we and where are we going?

Assessing the quality of environmental design of nursing homes for people with dementia: development of a new tool

Patient Outcomes in Palliative Care for South Australia

The impact of self-efficacy on asthma management amongst older Australian adults

Supplementary Online Content

5.2 Main causes of death Brighton & Hove JSNA 2013

A 10-year cohort study of the burden and risk of in-hospital falls and fractures using routinely collected hospital data

Palliative care phase: inter-rater reliability and acceptability in a national study

Care Pathways: Conditions most likely to cause blockages within emergency hospital care

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework Report

Investigation of relative survival from colorectal cancer between NHS organisations

ABCDEF Bundle Breakout

LABs Albumin. (g/dl) Haemoglobin, (g/l) Creatinin, (mg/dl)

LUNGS IN ACTION: Maintaining Exercise Capacity in Clients with COPD Post Completion of Pulmonary Rehabilitation

AROC Outcome Targets Report Inpatient Pathway 3

Hu J, Gonsahn MD, Nerenz DR. Socioeconomic status and readmissions: evidence from an urban teaching hospital. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(5).

Population risk stratification in outcome analysis - approaches and innovative solutions

A Pause in the Availability of Risk Adjusted National Benchmarks for AHRQ Indicators and an Alternative Measurement Approach

2017 ST3 Competition Ratios Medical Specialties

Transcription:

University of Wollongong Research Online Australian Health Services Research Institute Faculty of Business 2014 Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses: multiplicative model for SESLHD Jennifer P. McNamee University of Wollongong, jmcnamee@uow.edu.au Michael A. Navakatikyan mnavakat@uow.edu.au Dominic Dawson University of Wollongong Publication Details J. McNamee, M. Navakatikyan & D. Dawson "Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses: multiplicative model for SESLHD", Activity Based Funding Conference, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, 23-25 Jun 2014, (2014) http://nccc.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/documents/doc/uow180149.pdf Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: research-pubs@uow.edu.au

Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses: multiplicative model for SESLHD Abstract [extract] What is CHADx? The Classification of Hospital Acquired Diagnoses (CHADx) classification groups over 4,500 ICD- 10-AM diagnosis codes into a manageable hierarchy of 17 classes and 145 sub-classes to characterise hospital acquired complications. Keywords hospital, impact, cost, stay, length, model, multiplicative, diagnoses, acquired, seslhd Publication Details J. McNamee, M. Navakatikyan & D. Dawson "Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses: multiplicative model for SESLHD", Activity Based Funding Conference, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre, 23-25 Jun 2014, (2014) http://nccc.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/ documents/doc/uow180149.pdf This conference paper is available at Research Online: http://ro.uow.edu.au/ahsri/611

Length of stay and cost impact of hospital acquired diagnoses - a multiplicative model for SESLHD A collaborative project between SESLHD & University of Wollongong: Jenny McNamee (Director, NCCC) Dr Michael Navakatikyan (Research Fellow, Applied Statistics) Assc Prof Dominic Dawson, SESLHD

What is CHADx? The Classification of Hospital Acquired Diagnoses (CHADx) classification groups over 4,500 ICD- 10-AM diagnosis codes into a manageable hierarchy of 17 classes and 145 sub-classes to characterise hospital acquired complications. The CHADx allow(s) Australian hospitals to monitor the range of hospital-acquired diagnoses coded in routine data in support of quality improvement efforts. CHADx is intended for use within hospitals, and not as a means for external monitoring of hospital performance and holding hospitals to account. The occurrence of a hospital acquired complication is identified using the condition-onset flag, which is applied to each ICD10-AM diagnosis code. New data item in NSW in 2011/12.

What is CHADx? The 17 CHADx categories 1. Post-procedural complications 2. Adverse drug events 3. Accidental injuries 4. Specific infections 5. Cardiovascular complications 6. Respiratory complications 7. Gastrointestinal complications 8. Skin conditions 9. Genitourinary complications 10. Hospital-acquired psychiatric states 11. Early pregnancy complications 12. Labour, delivery & postpartum complications 13. Perinatal complications 14. Haematological disorders 15. Metabolic disorders 16. Nervous system complications 17. Other complications Source: http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/information-strategy/healthinformation-standards/classification-of-hospital-acquired-diagnoses-chadx/

Purpose: The SESLHD project To test the feasibility of using CHADx to identify issues relating to safety and quality an assess the impact. Features and benefits of CHADx; Routine data has the advantage of being comprehensive, timely and available at no additional cost. With 144 classes, CHADx allows better understanding of the full range of hospital-acquired conditions. Ability to estimate the marginal contribution of events to patient treatment costs to aid in priority setting for patient safety programs on the basis of system costs. Allows hospitals to identify any changes associated with local patient safety strategies in near real time. Ability to monitor changes in rates for particular complication types. Source: Jackson, T., Michel, J. L., Roberts, R. F., Jorm, C. M., and Wakefield, J. G. 2009. A classification of hospital-acquired diagnoses for use with routine hospital data

The SESLHD Dataset ICD-10-AM: 2011/12-582,833 2012/13-636,820 Subset COF =1, validated: 2011/12-45,608 (7.8%) 2012/13-44,607 (7.0%) Number of CHADx*: 2011/12-29,554 2012/13 29,820 Episodes w CHADx**: 2011/12 14,832 2012/13 15,391 Diagnoses codes grouped into classes and sub-classes according to CHADx (Jackson et al., 2009a). Utilized COF validation algorithm (Jackson et al., 2009b) Utilised SAS grouper for CHADx Version 4.1 provided by Queensland Health (Utz et al., 2012) * Some CHADx codes do not need COF=1 ** Episodes with one or more CHADx

Descriptive analysis Hospital Episodes without CHADx code Episodes with CHADx code N Mean LOS N Mean LOS A 20,235 2.1 376 10.1 B 12,796 3.3 1,465 21.2 C 67 1.0 D 1,231 19.6 5 14.8 E 81,032 3.5 5,669 18.2 F 103,138 3.1 9,446 11.0 G 46,776 3.6 5,966 10.7 H 22,999 2.3 7,301 6.5 Total 288,274 3.2 30,228 11.7 o Basic statistics with Winsorization procedure applied to account for extreme values in LOS o 2011/12 and 2012/13 (includes same day episodes)

Descriptive analysis Percentage of episodes with at least one CHADx code 10% 8% 6% 4% 9.5% 9.5% 9.0% 2% 0% 2011/12 2012/13 2011/11 SES Queensland* *Utz et al 2012 Queensland public hospitals, financial year 2010/11, Figure 2-1

Descriptive analysis frequencies Frequency (%) of episodes by CHADx classes 2.5 2.0 2011/12 2012/13 2011/12 Queensland % of total episodes 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CHADx class Source Qld data: Utz et al 2012 Queensland public hospitals, financial year 2010/11, Figure 2-2

Statistical model Generalised linear regression analysis was performed on each hospital subset of the data to assess increases in LOS and cost for episodes with CHADx assignment compared to episodes with no CHADx assignment. Same day episodes were excluded from modelling. Variable* Categories CHADx Independent variables Model (IV) 1: included number of in CHADx regression codes/episode model values 0, 1,2,3 9, 10+ Model 2: each of the 17 CHADx class Model 3: each of the 145 CHADx subclass DRGs AR-DRG v6.x (casemix) Charlson Comorbidity Index groups 0, 1 to 6+ (weights for pre-existing conditions) Separation type home, death, transfer, incomplete Age groupings <1, 1-16, 17-64, 65-79, 80+ Episode type acute, other Urgency on admission urgent, non-urgent COF=1 without CHADx 'yes', 'no' * Gender was removed as it was an uninformative variable

Charlson Comorbidity Index (Sundararajan et al, 2004) Used as an IV to adjust for impact of comorbidities on LOS and cost Diagnositc category Weight ICD-10-AM Acute myocardial infarction 1 I21, I22, I252 Congestive heart failure 1 I50 Peripheral vascular disease 1 I71, I790, I739, R02, Z958, Z959 Cerebral vascular accident 1 I60, I61, I62, I63, I65, I66,G450, G451, G452, G458, G459, G46, I64, G454, I670, I671, I672, I674, I675, I676, I677 I678, I679, I681, I682, I688, I69 Dementia 1 F00, F01, F02, F051 Pulmonary disease 1 J40, J41, J42, J44, J43, J45, J46, J47, J67, J44, J60, J61, 500, 501, 502, 503, 504, 505 J62, J63, J66, J64, J65 Connective tissue disorder 1 M32, M34, M332, M053, M058, M059, M060, M063, M069, 71481(now 5171), 725 M050, M052, M051, M353 Peptic ulcer 1 K25, K26, K27, K28 Liver disease 1 K702, K703, K73, K717, K740, K742, K746, K743, K744, K745 Diabetes 1 E109, E119, E139, E149, E101, E111, E131, E141, E105, E115, E135, E145 Diabetes complications 2 E102, E112, E132, E142 E103, E113, E133, E143 E104, E114, E134, E144 Paraplegia 2 G81 G041, G820, G821, G822 Renal disease 2 N03, N052, N053, N054, N055, N056, N072, N073, N074, N01, N18, N19, N25 Cancer 2 C0, C1, C2, C3, C40, C41, C43, C45, C46, C47, C48, C49, C5,C6, C70, C71, C72, C73, C74, C75, C76, C80, C81, C82, C83, C84, C85, C883, C887, C889, C900, C901, C91, C92, C93, C940, C941, C942, C943, C9451, C947, C95, C96 Metastatic cancer 2 C77, C78, C79, C80 Severe liver disease 2 K729, K766, K767, K721 HIV 2 B20, B21, B22, B23, B24

Statistical model choice of distribution o o o Standard Ordinary Least Squares regression assumes that data are distributed normally, at least symmetrically. Cost and LOS data are right skewed. Taking log of the data, makes distribution symmetrical. An alternative distribution, such as gamma distribution for cost and zero-truncated negative binomial for LOS, and multiplicative model (log link) are appropriate for a skewed dataset.

Cost impact assessment 4 models rejected by Bayesian Information Criterion fitted to the residuals after subtraction of the DRG means over episodes without CHADx; expected to provide a low estimation of impact.

Modelled impact cost and LOS Study results Activity (days), year 1 Activity (days), year 2 Direct cost ($), year 1 Direct cost ($), year 2 Raw data Model, adjusted for confounders Mean LOS and cost per episode Extra beddays and cost for episodes with CHADx Extra beddays and cost for episodes with CHADx Overall 6.2 6.0 6,213 6,843 Without CHADx 5.1 4.9 4,791 5,298 With CHADx 12.3 11.5 14,058 15,471 Mean per episode 7.3 6.6 9,266 10,173 Sum over episodes 105,958 days 99,261 days $123,716,172 $128,416,408 Mean per episode 4.9 4.1 6,333 6,343 Sum over all episodes with CHADx N episodes 71,697 (14% extra) 14,600 62,483 (12% extra) 15,107 $84,558,109 (19% extra) 13,351 $80,073,512 (16% extra) 12,623 Sum over 6+ CHADx episodes 16,294 12,870 $29,677,527 $25,439,402 N episodes with 6+ CHADx 607 560 560 530 LOS (days) for five WA hospitals, (Trentino et al, 2013) w/o CHADx 5.4 with CHADx 17.4

Additional bed days, adjusted

Total direct cost impact, adjusted

OPPORTUNITIES FOR APPLICATION IN SESLHD

Results by hospital- Top 5 specialties 2011/2012 2012/2013 Hospital AMO speciality No of CHADx codes AMO speciality No of CHADx codes Obstetrics 2,153 Obstetrics 2,207 Aged Care 939 Paediatrics 1,014 Hospital F Paediatrics 933 Aged Care 982 Hepatology 410 Hepatology 487 Cardiothoracic 402 Colorectal Surgery 332 Percent of total 51.5% Percent of total 53.5% Total 9,393 Total 9,388 Hospital H Obstetrics 4,752 Obstetrics 4,788 Paediatrics 1,896 Paediatrics 2,147 Oncology 330 Oncology 284 Gynaecology 164 Gynaecology 124 Breast Surgery 22 Breast Surgery 41 Percent of total 100.0% Percent of total 100.0% Total 7,164 Total 7,384

Top 3 CHADx classes by specialty Top 5 AMO Number of CHADX codes, 2012/13 CHADx class name speciality at Hospital F Total Top 3 CHADx classes Obstetrics 2,207 1,958 12-Labour, Delivery & Postpartum complications 95 17-Other complications 24 9-Genitourinary complications Paediatrics 1,014 977 13-Perinatal complications 10 17-Other complications 10 8-Skin Conditions Aged Care 982 120 9-Genitourinary complications 106 10-Hospital-acquired Psychiatric states 104 3-Accidental injuries Hepatology 487 206 1-Post-procedural complications 56 2-Adverse drug events 39 15-Metabolic Disorders Colorectal Surgery 332 103 1-Post-procedural complications 39 5-Cardiovascular complications 36 15-Metabolic Disorders

Top 3 CHADx classes by specialty Top 5 AMO Number of CHADX codes, 2012/13 CHADx class name speciality at Hospital H Total Top 3 CHADx classes Obstetrics 4,788 3,435 12-Labour, Delivery & Postpartum compls 669 13-Perinatal complications 141 17-Other complications Paediatrics 2,147 2,047 13-Perinatal complications 29 4-Specific infections 23 1-Post-procedural complications Oncology 284 71 1-Post-procedural complications 46 15-Metabolic Disorders 42 2-Adverse drug events Gynaecology 124 31 1-Post-procedural complications 21 5-Cardiovascular complications 17 17-Other complications Breast Surgery 41 14 1-Post-procedural complications 8 5-Cardiovascular complications 5 17-Other complications

Discussion: Next Steps for SESLHD Confirmation & Program of Work Presentation to Executive LHD & Sectors Clinical champions engagement Clinical Governance Program Team Presentation to LHD Clinical & Quality Council Roadshow Sector Clinical Council & Performance Meetings Clinical Groups Establish detailed program plan

References ACSQHC, http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/information-strategy/health- information-standards/classification-ofhospital-acquired-diagnoses-chadx/ Jackson TJ, Michel JL, Roberts RF, Jorm CM, Wakefield JG. A classification of hospital-acquired diagnoses for use with routine hospital data. Med J Aust 2009a; 191:544-548. Jackson TJ, Michel JL, Roberts R, J Shepheard J, Cheng D, Rust J, Perry C. Development of a validation algorithm for condition onset flagging. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision-Making 2009b; 9:48. Jackson TJ, Nghiem HS, Rowell DS, Jorm C, Wakefield J (2011). Marginal costs of hospital acquired conditions: information for priority setting for patient safety programs and research. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy; 16(3):141 146. Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson Comorbidity Index predicted in-hospital mortality. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004; 57: 1288 1294 Trentino KM, Swain SG, Burrows SA, Spivulis PC, Daly FFS (2013) Measuring the incidence of hospital acquired complications and their effect on length of stay using CHADx Medical Journal of Australia 199(8):543-547. Utz M, Johnston J, Halech R. A review of the Classification of Hospital-Acquired Diagnoses (CHADx). Technical Report #12. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 2012.