IMAZAPYR (267) First draft prepared by Mr M Irie, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan

Similar documents
5.9 DIFLUBENZURON (130)

Boscalid BOSCALID (221)

5.31 THIAMETHOXAM (245) see also CLOTHIANIDIN (238)

5.24 METHOXYFENOZIDE (209)

5.10 DIFENOCONAZOLE (224)

Azoxystrobin 153. AZOXYSTROBIN (229) The first draft was prepared by Dr U Banasiak, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

5.17 METHOXYFENOZIDE (209)

5.20 PROTHIOCONAZOLE (232)

Table 1 Validation of analytical method used in the supervised trials

Triazaphos TRIAZAPHOS (143) EXPLANATION RESIDUE ANALYSIS Analytical methods Stability of pesticide residues in stored analytical samples

5.23 PROPAMOCARB (148)

Clothianidin 169. CCN Commodity name Origin of use MRL mg/kg STMR or STMR-P mg/kg

5.20 PYRACLOSTROBIN (210)

Fluopyram FLUOPYRAM (243)

5.8 DIMETHOMORPH (225)

TOLFENPYRAD (269) The first draft was prepared by Dr Farag Mahmoud Malhat, Central Agricultural pesticides Laboratory Giza, Egypt

Chlorantraniliprole 67

TRIAZOPHOS (143) First draft prepared by Prof. Dr. Arpad Ambrus, Hungarian Food Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary EXPLANATION

Cypermethrins CYPERMETHRINS (INCLUDING ALPHA- AND ZETA-CYPERMETHRIN) (118)

FLUTOLANIL (205) First draft prepared by Dr Yukiko Yamada, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan

5.18 FLUDIOXONIL (211)

FLUDIOXONIL (211) First draft prepared by Dr. Yukiko Yamada, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan

Carbofuran CARBOFURAN (096)

374 Saflufenacil Short-term dietary exposure

Cyromazine 403. CYROMAZINE (169) First draft prepared by Dr. Yukiko Yamada, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan

ACETAMIPRID (246) First draft prepared by Ms K. Mahieu, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), The Netherlands

FLONICAMID (282) The first draft was prepared by Ms M Thomas, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Canada

PROPICONAZOLE (160) The first draft was prepared by Professor Eloisa Dutra Caldas, University of Brasilia, Brazil

PESTICIDES RESIDUES IN SPICES

5.28 PICOXYSTROBIN (258)

FLUCYTHRINATE (152) EXPLANATION

triadimefon TRIADIMEFON (133) EXPLANATION

Imazamox IMAZAMOX (276)

CHLOROTHALONIL (081) The first draft was prepared by Dr William Donovan, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA

Boscalid 175 BOSCALID (221)

PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF DATA DOSSIERS TO JMPR BY MANUFACTURERS. Dr Caroline A Harris and Cecilia Gaston Exponent International Ltd, UK

JMPR Review and MRL Recommendations Prof. Dr. Árpád Ambrus

FENVALERATE (119) EXPLANATION

4. EVALUATION OF DATA FOR ACCEPTABLE DAILY INTAKE (ADI) FOR HUMANS, MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS AND SUPERVISED TRIALS MEDIAN RESIDUES (STMRS)

CHAPTER 6 JMPR PRACTICES IN ESTIMATION OF MAXIMUM RESIDUE LEVELS, AND RESIDUES LEVELS FOR CALCULATION OF DIETARY INTAKE OF PESTICIDE RESIDUES

5.12 FENPROPIMORPH (188)

Boscalid BOSCALID (221)

DELTAMETHRIN (135) The first draft was prepared by Mr David Lunn, Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand

EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT: CURRENT SITUATION IN THE PHILIPPINES

Estimation of animal intakes and HR, STMR and MRL calculations for products of animal origin

PROPICONAZOLE (160) The first draft was prepared by Professor Eloisa Dutra Caldas University of Brasilia, Brasília/DF, Brazil

Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for iodosulfuron according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of confirmatory data submitted for the active substance dichlorprop-p 1

5.14 DITHIANON (028) The Meeting concluded that these degradates of dithianon are unlikely to be genotoxic in. vivo.

5.14 ISOFETAMID (290)

PROTHIOCONAZOLE (232) The first draft was prepared by Dr F M Malhat, Central Agricultural pesticides Laboratory Giza, Egypt

DICOFOL (026) EXPLANATION

5.6 CHLORMEQUAT (015)

Modification of the existing MRLs for chlorothalonil in barley and several food commodities of animal origin 1

Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for penthiopyrad in stone fruits and cereals. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

Penthiopyrad 271 N N N

Diquat DIQUAT (031)

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for mepiquat in oats, wheat and food commodities of animal origin 1

MRL setting and intakes for cereals. Annette Petersen

Reasoned opinion on the setting of MRLs for imazapyr in genetically modified soya bean and other oilseeds and in lentils 1

METHOMYL (094) First draft prepared by Yibing He, Institute for the Control of Agrochemicals, Ministry of Agriculture, China

Setting of new MRLs for isopyrazam in several cereals and food commodities of animal origin 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for pyraclostrobin in leafy brassica and various cereals 1

5.17 MANDIPROPAMID (231)

Evaluation of active substances in plant protection products Residues Anja Friel European Food Safetey Authority, Parma/ Italy

Review of the existing maximum residue levels for chloridazon according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005

Bifenthrin 37 CH 3. O CF 3 Cl

Reasoned opinion on the setting of import tolerances for acetochlor in soya beans and cotton seeds 1

Triadimefon/Triadimenol 249

Spirotetramat 1531 SPIROTETRAMAT (234)

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for bromuconazole in wheat and rye 1

Modification of the existing MRLs for propiconazole in table and wine grapes, apples and stone fruits (apricots, peaches and nectarines) 1

5.1 AMETOCTRADIN (253)

Natamycin DIETARY RISK ASSESSMENT

Cyromazine N N NH 2 NH 2

PROPARGITE (113) First draft prepared by David Lunn, New Zealand Food Safety Authority, Wellington, New Zealand.

Setting of new MRLs for fluxapyroxad (BAS 700 F) in various commodities of plant and animal origin 1

SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

BOSCALID (221) First draft prepared by Mr C Sieke, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany

European Union comments for the. CODEX COMMITTEE ON PESTICIDE RESIDUES 44th Session. Shanghai, China, April 2012.

5.19 MESOTRIONE (277)

5.14 FLUFENOXURON (275)

Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for cyproconazole in pulses, barley and oat

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for 2,4-D according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 1

AZOXYSTROBIN (229) First draft prepared by Mr C Pan, Department of Applied Chemistry, China Agricultural University, Beijing , P R China

Modification of the existing MRLs for metaldehyde in various crops 1

FLUPYRADIFURONE (285) First draft prepared by Dr P Humphrey, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, Canberra, Australia

5.23 ISOPROTHIOLANE (299)

Codex MRL Setting and Harmonization. Yukiko Yamada, Ph.D.

The Second Draft of Provisional Maximum Residue Limits (MRLs) for Agricultural Chemicals in Foods

5.6 CHLOROTHALONIL (081) AND METABOLITES R AND SDS-3701

BIFENAZATE (219) First draft prepared by Prof. Dr. Arpad Ambrus, Hungarian Food Safety Office, Budapest, Hungary EXPLANATION

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for pyraclostrobin in cucumbers and Jerusalem artichokes 1

5.6 CHLORANTRANILIPROLE (230)

Modification of the existing MRLs for cyflufenamid in various crops 1

Flupyradifurone The structure of the key metabolites discussed, are shown below: fpd-acetyl-amcp fpd-oh fpd-oh-sa. glua Cl

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for quizalofop-p in oilseed rape, sunflower, cotton and soybean 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRL for 8- hydroxyquinoline in tomatoes 1

Reasoned opinion on the modification of the existing MRLs for prothioconazole in rape seed, linseed, poppy seed and mustard seed 1

Transcription:

1627 IMAZAPYR (267) First draft prepared by Mr M Irie, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo, Japan EXPLANATION Imazapyr is a broad-spectrum herbicide in the imidazolinone family. It was first evaluated by JMPR in 2013 (T, R). An ADI of 0 3 mg/kg bw was established and an ARfD was unnecessary. The compound was evaluated for residues in. In 2013 the Meeting agreed that the definition of the residue was imazapyr for plant and animal commodities (for compliance with MRLs and for estimation of dietary intake). It was listed by the 48 th Session of CCPR (2016) for the evaluation of 2017 JMPR for additional MRLs. The current Meeting received information on analytical method, use patterns and supervised residue trials support estimation of a maximum residue level for barley. RESIDUE ANALYSIS Analytical methods The Meeting received information on the analytical method (Method M3098) for the determination of related compound of imazapyr (imazamox and CL 263284) in wheat forage, hay, straw and grain (Xu and Nejad, 1999: ID-244-026). This method was evaluated at the 2014 JMPR. This method was modified by the performing laborary allow simultaneous analysis of imazapyr and imazamox residues and replaced the method of determination from capillary electrophoresis LC-MS/MS. These changes were validated within the residue study by analyzing untreated control specimens fortified with known amounts of imazapyr and imazamox and determining the percent recovery. Concurrent recovery results for the method performance on imazapyr in barley from the supervised residue study (Allen, 2009: 2009/1130682) were summarized in Table 1. The method is suitable for the analysis of imazapyr residues in barley forage, straw and grain. Table 1 Concurrent recovery results of method M3098 for the determination of residues of imazapyr in barley Commodity Fortification level N Mean recovery % RSD (mg/kg) (%), forage 0.01 2.0 6 88.8 4.2, grain 0.01 2.0 6 92.4 6.4, straw 0.01 2.0 6 100.4 5.3 USE PATTERN The Meeting received labels in. The authorized uses relevant the supervised residue trials data submitted the current Meeting are summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Registered uses of imazapyr relevant the residue evaluation by the current Meeting Crop Country Formulation PHI, Type Conc. of Method Rate kg Volume No. imazapyr ai/ha max (imidazolinonelerant) SL 15 g/l Foliar spray 0.0056-0.011 Min. 70 1 a b a Apply the crops from the 5 leaf stage 1st node stage. Do not apply after the 1st node stage (Z31). b Do not graze or cut for forage and fodder for 4 weeks after application.

1628 Imazapyr RESIDUES RESULTING FROM SUPERVISED TRIALS ON CROPS The Meeting received information on imazapyr supervised field trials for the following crops. Group Commodity Table Cereal grains Straw, fodder and forage of cereal grains and grasses forage and straw Table 4, 5 Table 6, 7 Imazapyr formulation was applied for foliar treatment. Each of the field trial sites generally consisted of untreated control plot and treated plot. Residues, application rates and spray concentrations have generally been rounded two significant figures. Residue values from the trials, which have been used for the estimation of maximum residue levels, STMRs and HRs, are underlined. Laborary reports included method validation with procedural recoveries from spiking at residue levels similar those occurring in samples from the supervised trials. Date of analyses and duration of residue sample srage were also provided. Although trials included control plots, no control data are recorded in the tables except when residues were found in samples from control plots. Residue data are not corrected for percent recovery. Conditions of the supervised residue trials were generally well reported in detailed field reports. Most field reports provided data on the sprayers used, plot size, field sample size and sampling date. Cereal grains Two field trials on imidazolinone-lerant barley were conducted in during the growing season. The SL formulation was applied once as broadcast foliar application when the crop was at the 1-2 node growth stage. A small plot harvester was used collect the grain. Grain samples were collected at typical harvest stage (59 and 68 after application). The samples were placed in labelled plastic bags, double bagged and placed in freezers. The method M 3098 was used for analysis of imazapyr residues in barley grain samples with LC-MS/MS. Average recovery of imazapyr in barley grain was shown in Table 1. The LOQ was 0.01 mg/kg. Table 3 Imazapyr residues on imidazolinone-lerant barley grain from supervised trials in (Allen, 2009: 2009/1130682) Murchison/ VIC (Clearfield) Roseworthy/ SA (Clearfield) DALA Residues, mg/kg Ref Form kg ai/ha water, Growth Stage no. Days SL 0.0056-0.011 min. 70 the 5 leaf stage 1 1st node stage SL 0.011 100 1-2 nodes 1 68 0.022 100 1-2 nodes 1 68 101 SL 0.011 100 First node 1 59 0.022 100 First node 1 59 122 Four field trials on imidazolinone-lerant barley were conducted in different growing areas in during the and 2016 growing season determine the residue level of imazapyr

Imazapyr 1629 in/on barley grain. The SL formulation was applied once when the crop was between end of tillering first node stage (29 32 BBCH). Grain samples were collected at typical harvest stage, 84 140 after application. The Method M 2468 was develped for the analysis of imazapyr residues in maize grains. For the analysis of barley grain samples, this method was modified utilizing LC-MS/MS instead of GC- MS because of the greater sensitivity and shorter analysis time. Due the increased sensitivity, the extra SPE clean-up was not required. Average recoveries of imazapyr were 101 ± 12% (n=5, 0.02 mg/kg fortification level), 107 ± 3.2% (n=5, 0.2 mg/kg fortification level) and 96% (n=1, 1 mg/kg fortification level). The LOQ was 0.02 mg/kg. Table 4 Imazapyr residues on imidazolinone-lerant barley grain from supervised trials in (Bower, 2016: 2016/8000282) -2016 Forth/TAS Balliang/VIC Wasleys/SA Williams/WA DALA Residues, mg/kg Ref Form kg ai/ha water, Growth Stage no. Days SL 0.0056-0.011 min. 70 the 5 leaf stage 1 1st node stage SL 0.011 113 BBCH 31-32 1 84 0.19 0.023 111 BBCH 31-32 1 84 0.48 16 SL 0.011 99 BBCH 29-31 1 99 0.16 0.023 101 BBCH 29-31 1 99 0.46 42 SL 0.011 101 BBCH 31 1 88 0.25 30 0.023 101 BBCH 31 1 88 0.80 SL 0.011 100 BBCH 30 1 140 0.32 28 0.023 100 BBCH 30 1 140 0.84 Straw, fodder and forage of grasses Two field trials on imidazolinone-lerant barley were conducted in during the growing season. The SL formulation was applied once as broadcast foliar application when the crop was at the 1 2 node growth stage. Forage plants were selected at random from across the plots and cut off at ground level. Samples of forage were collected at 0, 28, 35 and 42 or 49 after application, from one/two nodes soft dough stage. A small plot harvester was used collect the straw specimens. Straw samples were collected at typical harvest stage (59 and 68 after application). All samples were placed in labelled plastic bags, double bagged and placed in freezers. The method M 3098 was used for analysis of imazapyr residues in barley forage and straw samples with LC-MS/MS. Average recoveries of imazapyr in barley forage and straw were shown in Table 1. The LOQ was 0.01 mg/kg. Table 5 Imazapyr residues on imidazolinone-lerant barley forage and straw from supervised trials in (Allen, 2009: 2009/1130682) Murchison/ VIC Growth Stage Form kg ai/ha water, no. at harvest SL 0.0056- min. 0.011 70 SL 0.011 100 1 1-2 node 1-2 node Milky dough Ealy dough Portion analysed DALA Days 1 Do not graze or cut for forage and fodder for 4 weeks after application Forage -0 0 28 35 Residues, mg/kg as as dry received weight 0.32 0.04 0.01 2.7 0.31 0.06 Ref 101-169

1630 Imazapyr Growth Stage Portion DALA Residues, mg/kg Ref Form kg ai/ha water, no. at harvest analysed Days as received as dry weight (Clearfield) Soft dough 49 Roseworthy/ SA (Clearfield) Grain ripe Straw 68 0.022 100 1 1-2 node 1-2 node Milky dough Ealy dough Soft dough Forage -0 0 28 35 49 0.97 0.19 0.06 0.05 8.8 1.5 0.40 0.32 Grain ripe Straw 68 0.01 0.01 SL 0.011 100 1 Z39 a Forage -0 Z39 0 0.16 1.2 Z71 b 28 0.02 0.16 Z73 c 35 0.01 0.06 Z85 d 42 Mature Straw 59 0.022 100 1 Z39 Forage -0 Z39 0 0.45 3.7 Z71 28 0.06 0.45 Z73 35 0.04 0.22 Z85 42 0.02 0.12 Mature Straw 59 a Z39: Flag leaf ligule just visible 122-181 b Z71: Kernel water ripe (no starch) c Z73: Early milk d Z85: Soft dough Four field trials on imidazolinone-lerant barley were conducted in different growing areas in during the and 2016 growing season determine the residue level of imazapyr in/on barley forage and straw. The SL formulation was applied once when the crop was between end of tillering first node stage (29 32 BBCH). Samples of forage were collected at 13/14, 27 29, 41/42 and 55/56 after application. Straw samples were collected at typical harvest stage, 84 140 after application. The Method M 2468 modified utilizing LC-MS/MS instead of GC-MS was used for the analysis of imazapyr residues in barley forage and straw samples. Average recoveries of imazapyr in barley forage were 103 ± 7.0% (n=6, 0.05 mg/kg fortification level) and 103 ± 2.6% (n=5, 0.5 mg/kg fortification level). Average recoveries of imazapyr in barley straw were 101 ± 9.8% (n=5, 0.05 mg/kg fortification level) and 100 ± 1.4% (n=5, 0.5 mg/kg fortification level). The LOQ was 0.05 mg/kg for barley forage and straw. Table 6 Imazapyr residues on imidazolinone-lerant barley forage and straw from supervised trials in (Bower, 2016: 2016/8000282) -2016 Forth/TAS Growth Stage Form kg ai/ha water, no. at harvest SL 0.0056- min. 0.011 70 SL 0.011 113 1 BBCH 41 BBCH 58-59 BBCH 83 BBCH 87 0.023 111 1 BBCH 41 BBCH 58-59 BBCH 83 BBCH 87 Portion analysed DALA Days 1 Do not graze or cut for forage and fodder for 4 weeks after application Forage 14 28 42 56 Residues, mg/kg as as dry received weight 0.077 0.051 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.45 0.22 0.12 0.13 BBCH 97-99 Straw 84 < 0.05 < 0.05 Forage 14 0.14 0.84 28 0.082 0.35 42 0.11 0.36 56 0.071 0.21 BBCH 97-99 Straw 84 < 0.05 < 0.05 Ref. 17-91

Imazapyr 1631 Balliang/VIC Wasleys/SA Williams/WA Growth Stage Form kg ai/ha water, no. at harvest SL 0.011 99 1 BBCH 29-31 BBCH 37 BBCH 41 BBCH 43 0.023 101 1 BBCH 29-31 BBCH 37 BBCH 41 BBCH 43 SL 0.011 101 1 BBCH 33-34 BBCH 45 BBCH 59 BBCH 75 Portion analysed DALA Days Forage 14 27 42 56 Residues, mg/kg as as dry received weight 0.16 0.81 0.099 0.57 < 0.05 0.26 < 0.05 0.19 BBCH 89 Straw 99 < 0.05 < 0.05 Forage 14 0.32 1.7 27 0.19 1.2 42 0.10 0.67 56 0.15 0.68 BBCH 89 Straw 99 0.067 0.13 Forage 14 0.10 0.57 29 0.074 0.30 41 0.078 0.24 55 0.087 0.20 BBCH 99 Straw 88 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.023 101 1 BBCH 33-34 BBCH 45 BBCH 59 BBCH 75 Forage 14 29 41 55 0.32 0.21 0.22 0.22 1.8 0.90 0.66 0.52 SL 0.011 100 1 BBCH 31-32 BBCH 33-37 BBCH 37-41 BBCH 37-51 0.023 100 1 BBCH 31-32 BBCH 33-37 BBCH 37-41 BBCH 37-51 BBCH 99 Straw 88 0.058 0.064 Forage 13 0.23 1.4 27 0.094 0.66 41 0.052 0.32 55 < 0.05 0.16 BBCH 99 Straw 140 < 0.05 < 0.05 Forage 13 0.37 2.7 27 0.19 1.5 41 0.088 0.66 55 0.061 0.38 BBCH 99 Straw 140 0.056 0.062 Ref. 42-100 30-117 28-128 APPRAISAL Imazapyr is a broad-spectrum herbicide belonging the imidazolinone family. It was first evaluated by JMPR in 2013 (T, R). An ADI of 0 3 mg/kg bw was established and an ARfD was unnecessary. The compound was evaluated for residues in. In 2013 the Meeting agreed that the definition of the residue was imazapyr for plant and animal commodities (for compliance with MRLs and for estimation of dietary intake). It was listed by the 48 th Session of CCPR (2016) for the evaluation of 2017 JMPR for additional MRLs. The current Meeting received information on analytical method, use patterns and supervised residue trials support estimation of a maximum residue level for barley. Method of analysis The Meeting received information on the analytical method (Method M3098) for the determination of related compounds, imazamox and its metabolite, in wheat forage, hay, straw and grain. This method was evaluated by the 2014 JMPR and modified allow simultaneous analysis of imazapyr and imazamox residues. The method is suitable for the analysis of imazapyr residues in barley forage, straw and grain. Stability of residues in sred analytical samples Freezer srage stability studies on maize (grain, forage and fodder) samples were evaluated by the 2013 JMPR. Srage stability results indicated that imazapyr residues were stable at -5-26 C for at

1632 Imazapyr least 27 months in maize (grain, forage and fodder). The periods of srage stability studies cover the sample srage intervals of residue trials. Residues resulting from supervised residue trials on crops The Meeting received supervised trial data for the foliar application of imazapyr on barley (imidazolinone-lerant) from. The supervised trials were conducted on imidazolinone-lerant barley in. The GAP on imidazolinone-lerant barley in is a foliar application at a maximum rate of 0.011 kg ai/ha from the 5 leaf stage the 1st node stage. Imazapyr residues in barley grains from independent trials in matching GAP were (n=6): (2), 0.16, 0.19, 0.25 and 0.32 mg/kg. Based on the residues for barley grains from trials in the Meeting estimated a maximum residue level and an STMR value for imazapyr in barley of 0.7 and 0.175 mg/kg respectively. Animal feedstuffs forage and straw Data were available from supervised trials on imidazolinone-lerant barley in. The GAP on imidazolinone-lerant barley in is a foliar application at a maximum rate of 0.011 kg ai/ha from the 5 leaf stage the 1st node stage and not graze or cut for forage and fodder for 4 weeks after application. Imazapyr residues in barley forage (as received) from independent trials in matching GAP were (n=6): 0.02, 0.04, 0.051, 0.087, 0.094 and 0.099 mg/kg. Based on the residues for barley forage, the Meeting estimated a median residue value and a highest residue value for imazapyr in barley forage of 0.069 and 0.099 mg/kg, respectively on an as received basis. Imazapyr residues in barley straw (dry weight basis) from independent trials in matching GAP were (n=6): (2) and < 0.05 (4) mg/kg. Based on the residues in barley straw, the Meeting estimated a maximum residue level of 0.05 mg/kg, a median residue value of 0.05 mg/kg and a highest residue value of 0.05 mg/kg for imazapyr in barley straw on a dry weight basis. Residue in animal commodities The 2017 JMPR evaluated residues of imazapyr in barley, which is listed in the OECD feeding table. The Meeting noted that the estimation did not result in a significant change of the dietary burdens of farm animals (18 18 ppm for cattle and 0.68 0.57 ppm for poultry). The previous recommendations of maximum residue level for animal commodities were maintained. RECOMMENDATIONS On the basis of the data from supervised trials, the Meeting concluded that the residue levels listed below are suitable for estimating maximum residue limits and for IEDI assessment. Definition of the residue (for compliance with the MRL and for estimation of dietary intake) for plant and animal commodities: Imazapyr

Imazapyr 1633 The residue is not fat soluble. Commodity Recommended MRL, mg/kg STMR or STMR-P, mg/kg CCN Name New Previous GC 0640 0.7 0.175 HR or HR-P, mg/kg AS 0640 straw and fodder, dry 0.05 (dw) 0.05 (dw) 0.05 (dw) * at or about the LOQ. dw dry weight Commodity STMR or STMR-P, mg/kg HR or HR-P, mg/kg Name forage 0.069 (as) 0.099 (as) as as received DIETARY RISK ASSESSMENT Long-term dietary exposure The International Estimated Daily Intakes (IEDIs) of imazapyr were calculated for the 17 GEMS/Food cluster diets using STMRs/STMR-Ps estimated by the 2013, and the current Meeting (Annex 3 the 2017 Report). The ADI is 0 3 mg/kg bw and the calculated IEDIs were 0% of the maximum ADI (3 mg/kg bw). The Meeting concluded that the long-term dietary exposure residues of imazapyr, resulting from the uses considered by the JMPR, is unlikely present a public health concern. Short-term dietary exposure The 2013 JMPR decided that an ARfD was unnecessary. The Meeting therefore concluded that the short-term dietary exposure residues of imazapyr is unlikely present a public health concern. REFERENCES Code Author Year Title, Institution, Report reference 2009/1130682 Allen K. 2009 Determination of residues of Imazamox and Imazapyr in imidazolinone lerant barley following a single foliar application of Intervix at first node detectable crop stage Perac Pty Ltd., Devonport Tasmania 7310, 2009/1130682, GLP, Unpublished 2016/8000282 Bower M. 2016 Determination of residues of Imazamox, (metabolite CL263284/4110773) and Imazapyr in Clearfield barley Perac Pty Ltd., Devonport Tasmania 7310, 2016/8000282, GLP, Unpublished