Incentives and Sanctions Responses to Client Behavior

Similar documents
TRI science. addiction

Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions

Shaping Behavior. Incentives and Sanctions. The Challenge

Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Targeting Interventions by Risk, Need, Responsivity DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, JD, PHD

Behavior Modification and the Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider

MCJRP 2016 Evolving Evidence Based Practice. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COORDINATING COUNCIL May 3, 2016

Incentives. Standard 17: Applying Incentives and Sanctions See section 10 of binder. Principles of Behavior Modification. Learning Objectives:

APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

INCENTIVES, Sanctions and Therapeutic Responses BEST PRACTICE STANDARDS IN A NUTSHELL HELEN HARBERTS

Assessing Risk for Persons with Behavioral Health Needs Involved in the Criminal Justice System

Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Chief of Science, Law & Policy. National Association of Drug Court Professionals

CREATIVE INCENTIVES. Developed by: National Drug Court Institute

Legal and Adversarial Roles in Collaborative Courts

ADULT DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

Specialty Courts, Detention Diversion, and Best Practices

Welcome to. St. Louis County Adult. Drug Court. This Handbook is designed to:

HARRIS COUNTY FELONY MENTAL HEALTH COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK JUDGE BROCK THOMAS JUDGE DAVID MENDOZA

NOT BE A DRUG COURT... DOUGLAS B. MARLOWE, J.D., PH.D.

EPICS. Effective Practices in Community Supervision. Brought to you by the Multco. EPICS Training team

Syracuse Community Treatment Court. Handbook for Participants. Guidelines and Program Information

DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK

An Overview of Procedures and Roles: A Case Study on the Drug Courts of Jamaica

EFFECTIVE PROGRAM PRINCIPLES MATRIX

Index. Handbook SCREENING & TREATMENT ENHANCEMENT P A R T STEP. Guidelines and Program Information for First Felony and Misdemeanor Participants

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

Community-based sanctions

Assessing Responsivity PRESENTED BY: MARK MCDONALD, MS, CRADC

Courts and Jails. Evidence-Based Judicial Decision Making

Handbook for Drug Court Participants

RECOVERY BASICS SCOPE AND SEQUENCE. An Educational Video Based on Best Practices in Recovery Management. from

Evidence-Based Sentencing to Reduce Recidivism

National Drug Court Institute. Drug Court Training. Presented by: Judge Phyllis McMillen & Jessica Parks

Live Free...Drug Free Tools for Hope

A Foundation for Evidence-Based Justice Decisions

Treatment of Individuals Living With Co-occurring Disorders

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

NEW MEXICO DRUG/DWI COURT Peer Review Summary Report

Treatment Approaches for Drug Addiction

2017 JDTC On-Site Technical Assistance Delivery REQUEST FORM

Phoenix/New Freedom Programs

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

PST-PC Appendix. Introducing PST-PC to the Patient in Session 1. Checklist

Use of Incentives and Sanctions to Promote Compliance with Supervision during Reentry: An Implementation Strategy

Behavior Modification and the Seriously Mentally Ill or Functionally Impaired: Special Issues to Consider

What recovery means: Independent living. Control of symptoms. Active remission of substance use. Competitive employment

THE ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND BENEFITS OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT PROGRAMS IN GEORGIA EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

Responsivity in the Risk /Need Framework February 10, 2011

Colorado Statewide DWI and Drug Court Process Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

Thirteen (13) Questions Judges Should Ask Their Probation Chiefs

Stephen W. Ward Assistant District Attorney (Retired) Charlotte, North Carolina

Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. NADCP July 28, 2015

TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY

The science of the mind: investigating mental health Treating addiction

Evidence-Based Sentencing to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism. A Model Curriculum for Judges

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

Words Matter: Terminology that Inhibits Successful Outcomes and What to Say if in a Court Team, Law Enforcement or Treatment

Doing Time or Doing Treatment: Moving Beyond Program Phases to Real Lasting Change

Berks County Treatment Courts

The New ASAM Criteria: Implications for Drug Courts

Addressing Co-Occurring Disorders in Court-Based Programs

PROCHASKA AND DICLEMENTE: STAGE of CHANGE MODEL. Prochaska and DiClemente s Stage of Change Model 2

Role of the Judge Standard III. Judge William Meyer (ret.) Senior Judicial Fellow National Drug Court Institute

Gearing Up Against Substance Abuse

Contingency Management with Adolescents and Their Families

2016 JDC On-Site Technical Assistance Delivery REQUEST FORM

The FY 2018 BJA Adult Drug Court Grant: Funding Opportunity for Tribes

OPEN TO CHANGE - 30: Open Group Substance Abuse Curriculum

Tri-Occurring supervision in the criminal Justice System

Treatment Planning Tools ASI-MV

COMPLIMENTARY TREATMENT STANDARD VI SOCIAL SERVICES AND

Kevin Knight, Ph.D., Associate Director Science of Addiction & Evidenced-Based Treatment

Best Practices for Effective Correctional Programs

Sober living houses are frequently a large, converted, residential home.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Understanding Drug Abuse and Addiction: What Science Says

E N V I R O N M E N T

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview

Incentives and Sanctions: Practical Application of the Science of Behavior Change. Shannon M. Carey, Ph.D. Based on Need to Know Fact Sheet by NDCI

Criminal Justice in Arizona

29/05/2014. Motivational Approaches: Supporting Individuals With Complex Needs. Triangle Community Resources. Diverse and Complex Characteristics

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

Contents Opioid Treatment Program Core Program Standards... 2

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

Part Two. Part Three. Drug Treatment Courts Training Workshop Montego Bay Jamaica February The Drug Treatment Court Client

STATUS REPORT: MEASURING OUTCOMES. Prepared by The Center for Applied Research and Analysis The Institute for Social Research University of New Mexico

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

Effective Treatment: Doing the Right Thing, In the Right Way. Terrence D Walton, MSW, ICADC

VISTA COLLEGE ONLINE CAMPUS

CLINICALLY SUPERVISED EXPERIENCE for the Criminal Justice Professional (PAGE 1 of 2) APPLICANT S NAME SUPERVISOR S NAME AGENCY

Eric L. Sevigny, University of South Carolina Harold A. Pollack, University of Chicago Peter Reuter, University of Maryland

Improving Outcomes in Methadone Treatment

Implementing Evidence-based Practices in a Louisiana Juvenile Drug Court

Women in Treatment Courts

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Section I. 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing.

MEMO. Representatives of all respondent groups see a primary impact of the DVCM position being increased offender accountability.

Fundamentals of Supervision

Transcription:

Incentives and Sanctions Responses to Client Behavior National Association of Drug Court Professionals Skills Building Session Judge Christine Carpenter Helen Harberts, M.S., J.D. May 28, 2014

Basic Principles of Effective Behavior Modification Presented By: Judge Christine Carpenter

Terminology SANCTION REWARD GIVE Punishment Positive Reinforcement TAKE Negative Reinforcement Response Cost

Carrot and Stick Reduce undesirable behaviors and increase desirable behaviors No thinning for punishment Positive vs. negative reinforcement

Tangible Rewards Most important for reinforcement-starved participants Fishbowl procedure Symbolic rewards

Certainty Reliable detection is key Random drug testing twice per week, including weekends and holidays Sufficient detection windows & panels Community supervision Last supervisory burdens to be lifted Second chances

Celerity Timing is second most influential Interference from new behaviors Status hearings every 2 weeks until the case has stabilized Noncompliance hearings where indicated

Magnitude Habituation Effects Effective Zone Ceiling Effects EFFECTIVENESS MINIMAL MODERATE SEVERE MAGNITUDE OF SANCTION

Procedural Fairness Clearly communicated policies and procedures Presumptive consequences with flexible application Opportunity to be heard Respect and dignity

The Top Ten 1. Sanctions do not need to be painful, humiliating or injurious. 2. Responses are in the eye of the participant. Incarceration is not necessarily viewed as the harshest punishment. 3. Responses must be of sufficient intensity. Smart and graduated.

The Top Ten. 4. Responses should be delivered for every infraction. The opposite holds true. Try to maintain a four to one ratio. 5. Responses should be delivered immediately. 6. Undesirable behavior must be reliably detected. Key component #5. Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing. Drug testing protocols. Reliable treatment information. Up to date case management.

The Top Ten 7. Responses must be predictable and controllable. Written manual for participants and for team. Key Component #6. A coordinated strategy governs responses to participant s compliance. 8. Responses may have unintentional side effects. Written manual for participants and for team. Failure to specify particular behaviors that are targeted and the consequences for non-compliance can result in a behavior syndrome know as learned helplessness where a participant can become aggressive, withdrawn and/or despondent.

The Top Ten 9. Behavior does not change by punishment alone. Effects of punishment are transitory change ends when punishment ends. 10. Method of delivery is key. Fairness and the perception of fairness are required. Use empathy and motivational interviewing. Key Component #7. Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential.

The Basics Responses are jointly developed by the team in staffing. Importance of entire team present at staffing Responses to behavior are graduated. Use the courtroom as theater. Stay entire time? Order of docket? Microphones? Entire team present? Reward good behavior. More incentives than sanctions. Catch them doing the right thing.

Exercise/Discussion Developing Low/Moderate/High Magnitude Responses Currently in your program, how do you effectively implement responses according to best practice principles; and What changes do you need to make in your program to effectively apply these principles in everyday practice

Target Behaviors for Drug Courts Presented By: Helen Harberts, M.S., J.D.

Is this new? NOPE! This is 60+ years of behavioral science research. What is new..is how we can apply this concept to a resistant court involved population.

The research Has been done Is easy to understand Is easy to implement once you understand it. Is just kind of odd for those who are not used to doing it.

Why do this strange stuff in Court? Q: What is the problem? A: drug addiction Q: What s the solution? A: Treatment! Length of time in treatment is the key. The longer a patient stays in treatment: the better they do. Coerced patients stay longer. The purpose of sanctions and incentives is to keep participants engaged in treatment.

The person in front of you is not the enemy: The Disease Is We know from research that the addict will choose immediate rewards over long term goals. They are prone to poor decision making. We need to catch and redirect undesired behavior, and we need to detect desired behavior and reward, reward, reward to teach what they should be doing. This target shifts over time for them, and for us, requiring the ultimate in competence and proficiency.

The enemy is a difficult opponent

Target Behaviors Analysis Addict or abuser? Proximal or distal goal? Appropriate response: sanction or reward.

Target Behaviors The target can change over time Determine what goals are and if they are proximal or distal Response to a proximal goal should be sanction high and reward low. Response to a distal goal should be sanction low and reward high.

Quitting & Defiance Learned Helplessness Predictability Controllability Ratio Burden

Target Behaviors Proximal vs. distal behaviors (shaping) Phase-specific Capture good behavior

Abuse vs. Dependence Substance Dependence or Addiction 1. Binge pattern 2. Cravings or compulsions 3. Withdrawal symptoms } Abstinence is a distal goal Substance Abuse } Abstinence is a proximal goal Collateral needs } Regimen compliance is proximal Dual diagnosis Chronic medical condition (e.g., HIV+, HCV, diabetes) Homelessness, chronic unemployment

Addicts vs. Abusers: Proximal and Distal Behaviors Should we emphasize certain target behaviors during different phases of the program? What Behaviors? Why? How do we respond to show that emphasis?

Prognostic Risk Factors Current age < 25 years Delinquent onset < 16 years Substance abuse onset < 14 years Prior rehabilitation failures History of violence Antisocial Personality Disorder Psychopathy Familial history of crime or addiction Criminal or substance abuse associations

Risk & Needs Matrix High Risk Low Risk High Needs Accountability, Treatment & Habilitation Low Needs

Risk & Needs Matrix High Needs Low Needs High Risk Accountability, Treatment & Habilitation Low Risk Treatment & Habilitation

Risk & Needs Matrix High Needs Low Needs High Risk Accountability, Treatment & Habilitation Accountability & Habilitation Low Risk Treatment & Habilitation

Risk & Needs Matrix High Needs Low Needs High Risk Accountability, Treatment & Habilitation Accountability & Habilitation Low Risk Treatment & Habilitation Prevention

Practice Recommendations High Needs Low Needs High Risk Phase 1: stabilization Biweekly status hearings Treatment & supervision are proximal Restrictive consequences Positive reinforcement Counseling & medication Phase 1: abstinence & compliance Biweekly status hearings Abstinence & supervision are proximal Restrictive consequences Habilitation services Low Risk Phase 1: stabilization Noncompliance hearings Treatment is proximal Positive reinforcement Counseling & medication Phase 1: abstinence Noncompliance hearings Abstinence is proximal Zero tolerance Prevention services

Focus on three major themes: Engagement Co-occurring disorders Physical Mental Different risk and needs means different responses. (Who is sitting before you and what should you expect from them and when should you expect it?)

You can get sharply better outcomes by Using your skills to engage Using your skills to encourage Using your skills to instill HOPE Selling recovery Using every skill you have to keep them coming back in spite of the pain and agony they are enduring. Understanding that early recovery (up to several years) really stinks.

Motivation, memory, engagement- Public Defender Engagement

Public Defender teaching in the hallways of the courthouse before court

DA training & engaging before Court- Treatment Team and Defense Bar present

Treatment in the courtroom reinforce the message

This is very difficult work for drug court participants: l-------------l--------------l-------------l-------------l Suicidal BAD GOOD VERY GOOD Euphoric NORMAL BRAIN RANGE l l l l l l l l l------------l------------l-------------l------------l Suicidal BAD GOOD VERY GOOD Euphoric RECOVERING BRAIN RANGE

Checklist for Your Consideration: Who are they (risk/need)? Where are they? (What phase in the program)? What are the behaviors we are responding to? (proximal or distal) What is the response choice and magnitude? How do we deliver and explain the response?

Exercise/Discussion Targeting your Interventions by Phase The team needs to identify specific goals for each phase and then respond to changes. Start with short term goals that lead to long term goals. Incentives and Sanctions should be at the appropriate cognitive and developmental level.

Resources/Wrap Up/Adjourn National Association of Drug Court Professionals Skills Building Session Judge Christine Carpenter Helen Harberts May 28, 2014

Examples of Incentives and Sanctions www.ndcrc.org

Exercise #1: Principles of Behavior Modification As a small group, discuss the following Principles of Behavior Modification according to the following: 1) Currently in your program, how do you effectively implement responses according to best practice principles; and 2) What changes do you need to make in your program to effectively apply these principles in everyday practice: Certainty 1. 2. Celerity 1. 2. Magnitude 1. 2. Procedural Fairness 1. 2.

Exercise #2: Targeting Your Interventions By Phase Prioritizing Target Behaviors and Responses for High Risk/ High Need Participants Work as a group to identify the proximal (P) and distal (D) target behaviors for HIGH RISK / HIGH NEED participants within each timeframe outlined below. The following list of target behaviors is not intended to be exhaustive. To add additional target behaviors, use next page. Discuss how you will apply this in your jurisdiction upon your return. Target Behavior (P) or (D) Phase I Acute Stabilization Phase II Clinical Stabilization Phase III Pro-Social Habilitation Phase IV Adaptive Habilitation Phase V Continuing Care Abstinence/ Neg. Drug Tests Treatment Attendance Drug Testing Attendance Court Attendance Candor with Court Positive Attitude Probation Attendance GED/School Job Readiness/ Employment Child Support Payments Court Fees/Fines Compliance w/ Medication AA/NA Attendance New Friends/ Hangouts

Target Behavior (P) or (D) Phase I Acute Stabilization Phase II Clinical Stabilization Phase III Pro-Social Habilitation Phase IV Adaptive Habilitation Phase V Continuing Care

Exercise #2: Targeting Your Interventions By Phase: Prioritizing Target Behaviors and Responses for High Risk/ Low Need Participants Work as a group to identify the proximal (P) and distal (D) target behaviors for HIGH RISK / LOW NEED participants within each timeframe outlined below. The following list of target behaviors is not intended to be exhaustive. To add additional target behaviors, use next page. Discuss how you will apply this in your jurisdiction upon your return. Target Behavior (P) or (D) Phase I Acute Stabilization Phase II Clinical Stabilization Phase III Pro-Social Habilitation Phase IV Adaptive Habilitation Phase V Continuing Care Abstinence/ Neg. Drug Tests Treatment Attendance Drug Testing Attendance Court Attendance Candor with Court Positive Attitude Probation Attendance GED/School Job Readiness/ Employment Child Support Payments Court Fees/Fines Compliance w/ Medication AA/NA Attendance New Friends/ Hangouts

Target Behavior (P) or (D) Phase I Acute Stabilization Phase II Clinical Stabilization Phase III Pro-Social Habilitation Phase IV Adaptive Habilitation Phase V Continuing Care

INCENTIVES AND SANCTIONS SKILLS BUILDING SESSION NADCP ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 28, 2014 9AM-12PM/2PM-5PM 9:00 9:45am / 2-2:45pm Plenary: Basic Principles of Effective Behavior Modification 9:45 10:15 / 2:45-3:15pm Exercise / Group Discussion: Developing Low/Moderate/High Magnitude Responses 10:15-10:30am / 3:15-3:30pm Break 10:30-11:15am / 3:30 4:15pm Plenary: Target Behaviors for Drug Courts 11:15 11:45 / 4:15-4:45pm Exercise: Targeting your Interventions by Phase 11:45 12:00pm / 4:45 5:00pm Wrap Up/Adjourn