eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Similar documents
COMPARE Trial Elvin Kedhi Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

Stephen G. Ellis, M.D. Professor of Medicine Director Invasive Services Co-Director Cardiac Gene Bank

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

Update from the Tryton IDE study

A Large Prospective Randomized Trial of DES vs BMS in Patients with STEMI

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Second Generation Drug Eluting Stents: From Inhibition to Healing

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Taking DES technology from concept to long term clinical evidence. Aurore Bouvier Global Product Manager Biosensors Europe

Disclosure Eberhard Grube, M.D.

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

HCS Working Group Seminars Macedonia Pallas Hotel, Friday 21 st February Drug-eluting stents Are they all equal?

EXCEL vs. NOBLE: How to Treat Left Main Disease in 2017 AATS International Cardiovascular Symposium December 8-9, 2017

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

The Interventional Trials of the Year: (TCT, AHA, and ACC)

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Biolimus A9 Drug-Eluting Stents: Technical Aspects and a Comprehensive Review of the EU, Asia-Pacific, and US Clinical Trial Program

OCT Technology: Differences between Biodegradable and Durable Polymers: Insights from the LEADERS Trial LEADERS OCT

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

From a DES to a BMS* Biosensors Clinical Trial Program. Taking the LEAD in DES Clinical Excellence. From Single de Novo.

Drug eluting balloons in CAD

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

Absorbable Scaffolds the Future of Coronary Interventions?

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

FANTOM II trial: Clinical results from the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting BRS. Norbert Frey, MD University of Kiel, Germany

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

Drug eluting stents From revolution to evolution. Current limitations

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

The Vascular Concepts - PRONOVA Durable Polymer Sirolimus Eluting Stent A Review of Indian Registry Results

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

Boston Scientific Corporation Drug-Eluting Stent Program

DES In-stent Restenosis

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

ABT 578 Elution from Phosphorylcholine: Zomaxx (Abbott)

Count Down to COMBAT

The BIO revolution: bioadsorbable stents. Federico Conrotto Cardiologia 2 Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

ZOMAXX I. B Chevalier For the ZOMAXX I Investigators ZOMAXX I

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

ΑΓΓΕΙΟΠΛΑΣΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΟ ΔΙΑΒΗΤΙΚΟ ΑΣΘΕΝΗ

Device and Clinical Program Highlights: SINOMED BuMA Stent

Bioabsorbable stents: early clinical results. Dr Angela Hoye MB ChB, PhD Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals

Next Generation Drug- eluting Stent : Will It Solve the Problem?

DRUG ELUTING STENTS. Cypher Versus Taxus: Are There Differences? Introduction. Methods SIGMUND SILBER, M.D., F.E.S.C., F.A.C.C.

TLR des Stents Actifs

Biosensors Lunch Symposium

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Drug Eluting Stents: Bifurcation and Left Main Approach

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

DISCOVER Ultimaster with Optical Frequency Domain Imaging

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

Unprotected LM intervention

Innovation in Cardiovascular Interventions. New DES, Scaffolds and other Devices Have Angioplasty Results Improved

Xience V (Promus) Drug-Eluting Coronary Stent

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

Ultimaster clinical results in left main and bifurcations

Stents selection and optimal implantation: sizes, design, deployment Abbott Vascular. All rights reserved.

NOBORI 2 Trials One Year Clinical Outcomes

Safety-outcomes of bioresorbable Everolimus eluting scaffold in (German-Austrian-ABSORB RegIsteR)

DES in Diabetic Patients

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

Insight from the CACTUS trial Coronary Bifurcation Application of the Crush

Single Center Consecutive Registry Of The New Atrium Flyer Coronary Stent System

eucalimus - First Experience

Why Polymer Coated Paclitaxel Stents

2-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Everolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice

ReZolve2 Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Clinical Program Update

The Clinical Evaluation of the Medtronic AVE Driver Coronary Stent System

Unprotected Left Main Stenting: Patient Selection and Recent Experience. Alaide Chieffo. S. Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Stent Thrombosis: Patient, Procedural, and Stent Factors. Eugene Mc Fadden Cork, Ireland

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

Drug Eluting Stents overhyped, overused and overpriced?

TRIAS HR Pilot Study

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

Bioabsorbable Scaffolds: The Next Holy Grail?

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

BIONICS Trial BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System In Coronary Stenosis Trial

BioMatrix TM : The New Biodegradable Abluminally Coated DES BioMatrix TM Clinical Program

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Left Main Disease: what is left to surgery? Prof. Jacques Monségu CardioVascular Institute Grenoble, France

Transcription:

Everolimus-eluting eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Abbott XIENCE V Everolimus-eluting eluting Stent Everolimus Durable Fluoropolymer ML VISION Stent Platform ML VISION Stent Delivery System SPIRIT Clinical Trials

Everolimus A Sirolimus Analog Sirolimus (Rapamycin) Everolimus H O HO O FKBP Binding domain O O N H O O O H O O O O O O O O O HO N O O O O O HO O O O Formula C 51 51 H 79 NO 13 13 ; MW: 914.2 C 53 53 H 83 NO 14 14 ; MW: 958.25 Original Indications Approvals Acute Rejection Kidney, Liver OUS & US Acute & Chronic Rejection Heart, Kidney, Lung OUS; US approvable

Coating Integrity XIENCE V Fluoropolymer (7.8 um thick) Dilated to 3.5 mm Uniform, consistent coating integrity upon deployment Good adhesion to stent no bonding, webbing, tearing Non-tacky drug matrix prevents unwanted adhesions Photos taken by and on file at Abbott Vascular

DES Strut and Polymer Thickness 3.0 mm diameter stents,, 500x magnification CYPHER TAXUS ENDEAVOR XIENCE V Strut Thickness: Strut Thickness: Strut Thickness: Strut Thickness: 140 µm Polymer Thickness: 12.6 µm Total: 152.6 um 132 µm Polymer Thickness: 16 µm Total: 148 um 91 µm Polymer Thickness: 5.3 µm Total: 96.3 um 81 µm Polymer Thickness: 7.8 µm Total: 88.8 um Strut thickness per manufacturer s s published specifications. Data on file at Abbott

14 Day Endothelialization: Rabbit Iliac Model XIENCE V CYPHER TAXUS ENDEAVOR c/o R. Virmani,, submitted

SPIRIT Family of Trials (N=10,430) SPIRIT First RCT Safety and performance, Europe N = 60 2 year F/U completed SPIRIT II RCT Clinical support for CE launch N = 300 1 year F/U completed SPIRIT III RCT Pivotal RCT with parallel registries, US & Japan N = 1,380 9 month RCT F/U completed SPIRIT IV RCT SPIRIT V RCT and Reg SPIRIT Women RCT and Reg Continued safety and performance RCT, US N = 3,690 Enrollment started Q3 06 OUS Registry N = 2700 Diabetic RCT N = 300 pts randomized 2:1 vs Taxus Enrollment started: Q4 06 OUS Registry + RCT N = 1550 pt registry RCT 450 pts randomized 2:1 vs Cypher Spirit VI US post market approval registry all comers (n=5000)

SPIRIT First: Study Design SPIRIT First Single de novo Lesions 2.8 3.2 mm, 12 mm length n = 60 1 : 1 XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent (n=28) ML VISION Control (n=32) Prospective, randomized, single-blind trial Stent Size: 3.0 x 18 mm Clinical follow-up: 1, 6, 9, and 12 months, 2, 3, 4, 5 years Angio and IVUS follow-up: 6 & 12 months Clopidogrel: 3 months Bailout only with BMS Only animal data on single stent available at the onset of the study Angiographic and IVUS core lab: Cardialysis Enrollment Complete: April 1, 2004 PI: Patrick Serruys,, MD, PhD Serruys PW et al. EuroInt 2005; 1:58-65

SPIRIT First: In-Stent LL at 6 and 12 Mos Cumulative Frequency (%) 100 80 60 40 20 XIENCE V (n=22) 6 Mo 12 Mo Control (n=25) 6 Mo 12 Mo XIENCE V 6Mo: XIENCE V 12Mo: Control 6Mo: Control 12Mo: 0.10 ± 0.23 0.23 ± 0.29 0.84 ± 0.36 0.81 ± 0.44 0-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Late Loss (mm)

SPIRIT II Trial (N=300) A maximum of two de novo lesions (1 lsn/artery) 2.5 4.25 mm 28 mm N = 300 3 : 1 XIENCE V N = 223 TAXUS Control N = 77 Prospective, single blind, randomized trial Stent sizes: 2.5 4.0 mm; Stent lengths: 8, 18, 28 mm Angio FU: 6 months in all pts; 2 years in 152 pts IVUS FU: 6 months and 2 years in 152 pts Clinical follow-up at 1, 6, 9 months, 1 and 2 years 6 months clopidogrel for both arms Primary endpoint: In-stent late loss at 6 months (NI) Serruys PW. EuroInterv 2006;2:286-294 294

Primary Endpoint: In-stent LL (Analysis lesion, 6 months) % of lesions 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 XIENCE V TAXUS 0.11 ± 0.27 (n = 201) 0.36 ± 0.39 (n = 73) Non-inferiority p<0.0001 Superiority p<0.0001-1 -0.5-0 0.5 1 1.5 2 In-stent late loss (mm) Angiographic 6-mo 6 FU: XIENCE V: 91%; TAXUS: 95%

Clinical Results at 12 Months P=0.04 Event rate (%) P=0.11 P=0.053 MACE = cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR Ruygrok P et al. ACC2007

SPIRIT III Study Algorithm 1002 pts enrolled at 65 U.S sites RVD 2.5 mm - 3.75 mm; Lesion length 28 mm Max. 2 lesions each in a different epicardial vessel Pre-rand: rand: ASA 300 mg, clopidogrel 300 mg load unless on chronic Rx Randomized 2:1 XIENCE V:TAXUS Stratified by diabetes and intent for 1 vs. 2 lesion treatment Pre-dilatation mandatory Everolimus-eluting eluting XIENCE V Paclitaxel-eluting eluting TAXUS Aspirin 80 mg QD for 5 years; Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 6 6 months Clinical f/u: : 1, 6, 9 months and yearly for 1-51 5 years Angio f/u (N=564) @ 8 mos; ; IVUS f/u (N=240) @ 8 mos

Patient Flow - Clinical Randomized (N=1,002) XIENCE V (N=669) Lost to f/u = 8 Patient withdrawal = 3 TAXUS (N=333) 7 = Lost to f/u 4 = Patient withdrawal 9 month follow-up * (N=980; 98%) XIENCE V (N=658) TAXUS (N=322) *F/U window ±14 days

Patient Flow - Angiographic Randomized (N=564) XIENCE V (N=376) Lost to f/u = 3 Patient withdrawal = 2 Death = 2 No qualifying angio = 67 TAXUS (N=188) 3 = Lost to f/u 3 = Patient withdrawal 1 = Death 37 = No qualifying angio 8 month angio F/U * (N=436; 77%) XIENCE V (N=302) TAXUS (N=134) *F/U window: ± 28 days

Baseline Demographics XIENCE V 669 pts TAXUS 333 pts P value Age (in years) 63.2 ± 10.5 62.8 ± 10.2 0.54 Male (%) 70.1 65.7 0.17 Hypertension (%) 76.2 74.0 0.48 Hypercholesterolemia (%) 74.2 71.5 0.36 Diabetes mellitus (%) 29.6 27.9 0.60 Insulin requiring (%) 7.8 5.5 0.19 Current smoker (%) 23.4 22.5 0.81 Prior MI (%) 19.9 18.0 0.49 Unstable angina (%) 18.7 25.1 0.02

Baseline Angiography XIENCE V 767 lesions TAXUS 382 lesions P value Lesion location LAD 41.3% 42.9% 0.61 LCX 27.6% 28.3% 0.83 RCA 31.0% 28.5% 0.41 LMCA 0.1% 0.3% 0.55 QCA RVD (mm) 2.77 ± 0.45 2.76 ± 0.46 0.87 MLD (mm) 0.82 ± 0.41 0.83 ± 0.40 0.79 % DS 70.0 ±13.3 69.4 ±13.6 0.54 Lsn length (mm) 14.7 ± 5.6 14.7 ± 5.7 0.92

Procedural Results XIENCE V 669 pts 768 lesions TAXUS 332 pts 382 lesions P value # lesions/pt* 1.2 ± 0.4 1.2 ± 0.4 1.0 2 lesion pts* 15.4% 15.4% 1.0 # stents/pt 1.3 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.5 0.27 # stents/lesion 1.2 ± 0.4 1.1 ± 0.3 0.07 Max. stent diameter/lesion (mm) 3.0 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 0.4 1.0 Max. stent diameter/rvd 1.1 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 0.56 Total stent length/lesion 22.8 ± 8.4 21.6 ± 7.8 0.02 Total stent length/lesion length 1.6 ± 0.5 1.5 ± 0.5 0.01 Maximum pressure (atm.) 14.8 ± 2.9 15.1 ± 2.6 <0.05 * All vessels had a single lesion except 5 pts in whom a single vessel had two lesions Of 1,322 total stents implanted, 8 were non study stents

% of Lesions 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% *F/U window ±28 days. Primary Endpoint: In-segment LL at 8 Months* (Analysis Lesion) TAXUS: 0.28 ± 0.48 (n=134) XIENCE V: 0.14 ± 0.41 (n=301) -1-0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 In-segment Late Loss (mm) P NI < 0.0001 P SUP = 0.004

Late Loss at 8 Months* XIENCE V 301 patients TAXUS 134 patients P value Analysis lesion 301 lesions 134 lesions In-segment 0.14 ± 0.41 0.28 ± 0.48 0.004 In-stent 0.16 ± 0.41 0.31 ± 0.55 0.006 All lesions 343 lesions 158 lesions In-segment 0.14 ± 0.39 0.26 ± 0.46 0.003 In-stent 0.16 ± 0.41 0.30 ± 0.53 0.002 *F/U window ±28 days.

Binary Restenosis at 8 Months* P=0.07 P=1.0 P=0.06 P=0.65 16/344 14/158 9/315 4/143 8/343 9/158 3/334 2/155 *F/U window ±28 days.

IVUS In-stent Measures at 8 Months* P=0.04 ±31.3 P=0.01 ±9.9% ±11.4 ±6.4% *F/U window ±28 days.

IVUS Incomplete Apposition (Paired lesion serial analysis) XIENCE V 90 lesions TAXUS 43 lesions P value Post procedure 34.4% 25.6% 0.33 8 months 25.6% 16.3% 0.27 Resolved 8.9% 9.3% 1.0 Persisting 24.4% 14.0% 0.18 Late acquired 1.1% 2.3% 0.54 IVUS performed in only 1 pt with stent thrombosis, showing no incomplete apposition either post procedure or at FU

TVF and MACE Through 270 Days* RR [95% CI] = 0.79 [0.51, 1.23] P NI <0.0001 SUP =0.31 P SUP RR [95% CI] = 0.56 [0.34, 0.94] SUP = 0.028 P SUP Rate (%) XIENCE V (657 pts) TAXUS (321 pts) 47/657 29/321 30/657 26/321 TVF MACE *F/U window ±14 days. TVF = Cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TVR. MACE = Cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR.

TVF Through 284 Days HR=0.79 [0.50 1.24] P logrank = 0.30 9.0% 7.2% TVF (%) Days

MACE Through 284 Days MACE (%) HR=0.56 [0.33 0.94] P logrank = 0.03 8.1% 4.6% Days

TVF Components Through 270 Days* P=0.67 P=0.64 P=0.053 P=0.45 P=0.47 *F/U window ±14 days.

Ischemia-driven TLR Through 284 Days Rate (%) HR=0.52 [0.26 1.02] P logrank =0.052 5.0% 2.6% Days

Safety Endpoints at 270 Days* XIENCE V (658 pts) TAXUS (322 pts) P=0.55 P=1.0 P=0.64 P=0.55 3.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.0% Q=0 Q=0.2 1.0% 0.9% 0.46% L=0.15 E=0.30 0 C=0.5 C=0.6 NC=0.5 NC=0.3 NQ=1.8 NQ=2.5 Stent thrombosis Death MI Death or MI *F/U window ±14 days. E = early ( 30d);( L = late (>30d-9mo); C = cardiac; NC = non cardiac; Q = Q-wave; Q NQ = non Q-waveQ

SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III RCTs: MACE 12 months 9 months P=0.04 P=0.03 P=0.003 MACE rate (%) N=220 N=76 N=658 N=322 N=878 N=398 MACE = cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR

SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III RCTs: Safety 12 months 9 months Event rate (%) P=1.0 P=0.38 P=0.34

SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III: Ischemic TLR 12 months 9 months Ischemic TLR rate (%) P=0.053 P=0.053 P=0.01 N=220 N=76 N=658 N=322 N=878 N=398

SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III: All TLR 12 months 9 months All TLR rate (%) P=0.065 P=0.004 P<0.0001 N=220 N=76 N=658 N=322 N=878 N=398

SPIRIT II and SPIRIT III Pooled: Restenosis 6 months 8 months Binary restenosis rate (%) P=0.02 P=0.03

SPIRIT IV Trial Expansion* Proposal for expansion submitted to FDA Randomized (N=3,690) *Previously 1,125 pts XIENCE V (N=2,460) 2 1 Single blind No angiographic FU TAXUS (N=1,230) Up to 3 lesions in 1, 2 or 3 separate vessels (2 max per vessel) Primary endpoint: MACE at 9 months (cardiac death, MI, ischemia-driven TLR) Sequential noninferiority and superiority testing Noninferiority power analysis: 8.2% common event rate, δ = 2.7%, 1-sided α = 0.025 80% power (allowing for 2.5% drop-out) out) If primarily powered for superiority : 8.2% rate with TAXUS, 4.8% rate with XIENCE V (absolute 3.4% reduction, relative 41.5% reduction), 2-sided α = 0.05 97% power (allowing for 2.5% drop-out) out)

Everolimus-eluting eluting XIENCE V stents Conclusions A polymer-based, 2 nd generation DES with optimal characteristics - Thin, robust, durable, non-adhesive polymer - Everolimus low late loss and %VO - 0.0032 CoCr struts excellent deliverability Extensive animal testing excellent safety profile Extensive clinical investigation safe and effective for typical on-label DES lesions