Shift in Virulence of Soybean Cyst Nematode is Associated with Use of Resistance from PI 88788

Similar documents
ABSTRACT: 67 SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE RESISTANCE HOW IT ALL COMES TOGETHER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES

Research. Plant Health Progress :

Brian Diers University of Illinois

Effect of Soybean Cyst Nematode on Fatty Acid Levels of Soybean Seed

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode

A High-Throughput Automated Technique for Counting Females of Heterodera glycines using a Fluorescence-Based Imaging System

Institute of Ag Professionals

SOIL PH IN RELATION TO BROWN STEM ROT AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE N.C. Kurtzweil 1, C.R. Grau 2, A.E. MacGuidwin 3, J.M. Gaska 4, and A.W.

Institute of Ag Professionals

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SDS AND SCN IN COMMERCIAL SOYBEAN FIELDS IN WISCONSIN 1. Introduction

Breeding for SCN Resistance in the South

The soybean cyst nematode (SCN), Heterodera glycines, is the number one yield reducer for

Soybean Cyst Nematode and other disease issues in soybean. Sam Markell, Ph.D. Extension Plant Pathologist North Dakota State University

Application of Real Time PCR for Detection And Identification of Soybean Pests in Michigan

Interactions Between the Soybean Cyst Nematode and Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines Based on Greenhouse Factorial Experiments

Soybean Cyst Nematode: a Continually Growing Problem in Soybeans?

Improving Management Of Soybean Cyst Nematode Through Extension Demonstration And Outreach

Fusarium root rot of soybean occurrence, impact, and relationship with soybean cyst nematode

Effect of Host Resistance to Fusarium virguliforme and Heterodera glycines on Sudden Death Syndrome Disease Severity and Soybean Yield

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode with the Soil Test and Crop Rotation

A 2015 multi-site field study on the effects of seed treatment on soybean yield and Soybean Cyst Nematode reproduction

Agronomy Notes Vol 30, No EARLY MATURING VARIETIES AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES: WILL THIS MARRIAGE WORK?

Heterodera glycines. A Threat to Dry Bean production. Berlin Nelson Jr., Professor, North Dakota State Univ., Plant Pathology

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

Evaluation of Soybean Varieties Resistant to Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iowa 2009

Loren Giesler, Nebraska Extension Plant Pathologist John Wilson, Nebraska Extension Educator Burt Co. Sclerotinia stem rot (White Mold)

Mapping of New Quantitative Trait Loci for Sudden Death Syndrome and Soybean Cyst Nematode Resistance in Two Soybean Populations

North Central Soybean Research Program. Seedling Diseases: Biology, Management and Education

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

DORIAN GATCHELL JANUARY 5, 2016 GRANITE FALLS, MN JANUARY 6, WATERTOWN, SD JANUARY 7, GRAND FORKS, ND

SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE MANAGEMENT ADVANCED CROP ADVISORS

Proceedings of the 2007 CPM Short Course and MCPR Trade Show

Strategies and Challenges in the Management of Clubroot Disease of Canola S.E. Strelkov, S.F. Hwang, M.D. Harding

Nematicidal Activity of Fatty Acid Esters on Soybean Cyst and Root-knot Nematodes 1

Infection by Heterodera glycines Elevates Isoflavonoid Production and Influences Soybean Nodulation 1

Localized Influence of Heterodera glycines on Sudden Death Syndrome of Soybean 1

1. INTRODUCTION. oldest commercial crops, plays a key role in the economic and social affairs of the world

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

Dynamics of Meloidogyne incognita Virulence to Resistance Genes Rk and Rk 2 in Cowpea

Effect of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Inoculum Density, Meloidogyne incognita and Cotton Cultivar on Fusarium Wilt Development

Institute of Agric ulture and Natural Resourc es Department of Plant Pathology

2016 Soybean Update. A) Variety options for 2016

Where are we with respect to clubroot management?

EFFECT OF FUSARIUM VIRGULIFORME AND HETERODERA GLYCINES ON SOYBEAN LILLIAN FRANCES BRZOSTOWSKI. B.S., Kansas State University, 2007 A THESIS

Root Rot Complex in Western Canada where are we at with Fusarium, Aphanomyces, and Phytophthora

Project title: Fusarium wilt of lettuce: management through detection, avoidance and disease resistance

PHENOLIC COMPOUNDS IN TOMATO SUSCEPTIBLE AND RESISTANT TO MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA (KOFOID ET WHITE) CHITWOOD. by K. L. BAJAJ and R.

STUDIES ON THE EFFECT OF AMINO ACIDS ON THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA INFECTING TOMATO

Project Title: Evaluating the Distribution and Potential Impacts of Soybean Vein Necrosis Virus in Delaware

Plant Pathology Fact Sheet

Does Soybean Genetics Affect Soybean Aphid/Virus Management?

oxysporum f, sp, ciceri and Meloidogyne javanica

Evaluation of glyphosate-tolerant soybean cultivars for resistance to bacterial pustule

Separate loci underlie resistance to root infection and leaf scorch during soybean sudden death syndrome

Stalking the Soybean Cyst Nematode in Manitoba: What You Need to Know

Funding for this research was provided by the Nebraska Soybean Board.

Fusarium Diseases of Tomato. Hung Doan, Gene Miyao and Mike Davi Department of Plant Pathology University of California, Davis

Designing Research and Demonstration Tests for Farmers Fields

Effects of Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum on Plant Mortality and Yield of Cotton

Project Title: Development of a method for conducting tests for resistance to tombusviruses and lettuce dieback in the greenhouse.

Research Notes: Single seed selection for carbohydrate content in soybean seeds

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Iron Chelates in Managing Iron Deficiency Chlorosis in Grain Sorghum

Deoxynivalenol: Known Facts and Research Questions. DON (deoxynivalenol) is a damaging toxin produced by the fungus Fusarium

- Determining the Causes - Dr. Diana Cox-Foster Pennsylvania State University

PROJECT PROPOSAL SUGARBEET RESEARCH AND EDUCATION BOARD OF MINNESOTA AND NORTH DAKOTA FY

Tree and Shrub Disease

Chemotaxis of Phytophthora sojae Zoospores to Soybean Roots is Altered by. Isoflavone Silencing. Kara Riggs. Advisor: Dr.

RESPONSES OF SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODE HETERODERA GLYCINES TO MACROELEMENT AND MICROELEMENT COMPOUNDS

Diagnosing Strawberry Root and Crown Diseases. Heather Scheck, Plant Pathologist, Santa Barbara County Ag Commissioner s Office

The wheat stem sawfly a nursery tale from the shortgrass prairie

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Foliar Fungicides for Soybeans best environmental conditions for that return on investment. Dr. Anne E. Dorrance Professor Plant Pathology

Molecular Biology and Etiology of FOV in Cotton

Corn and soybean yield responses to micronutrients fertilization

Lab Tuesday: Virus Diseases

Suppression of Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon Enhanced by Hairy Vetch Green Manure and Partial Cultivar Resistance

Plant-Induced Hatching of Eggs of the Soybean Cyst Nematode Heterodera glycines 1

THE RIGHT SEEDS. THE RIGHT PROTECTION.

Volume XII, Number 14 August 6, Late Blight Management in the Columbia Basin. Updates on Potato Psyllid and Zebra Chip (ZC)

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

THE PEST NAGEME NT GUIDE

Citrus Disease ID and Control. Ben Faber UC Cooperative Extension

Revisiting Soybean Aphids

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

Fusarium wilt trial results

Response of Sugarbeet Lines to Isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Betae from the United States

Kelly Young Horticulture Agent University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Maricopa County

Curriculum Vitae, December 12, 2013 LEONOR LEANDRO PROFESSIONAL RECORD

2005 RESEARCH SUMMARY WITH HERBICIDE-RESISTANT COMMON RAGWEED

in Cotton Dr. Steve Phillips Director, Southeast USA

Biochemical Detection of Phenolic Compounds and Peroxidase in New Locally Improved Tomato Lines by using HPLC

Distribution and Incidence of Sugar Beet Diseases in the Wind River and Big Horn River Basins of Northwest Wyoming

Managing Flea Beetles in Canola Julie Soroka

Control of the European pepper moth using biological control

NutriVision Technology Handbook

Host resistance for managing soilborne diseases in strawberry production

Nenad Tatalović Iowa State University

IDENTIFICATION OF QTLS FOR STARCH CONTENT IN SWEETPOTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS (L.) LAM.)

Funky Leaf Spot, Viruses, and Xylella Update Winter Phillip M. Brannen University of Georgia Plant Pathology Department

GAINES COUNTY IPM NEWSLETTER Manda G. Cattaneo, Extension Agent - IPM 101 S. Main RM B-8. Seminole, TX 79360

Transcription:

2008 Plant Management Network. Accepted for publication 11 October 2007. Published. Shift in Virulence of Soybean Cyst Nematode is Associated with Use of Resistance from PI 88788 T. L. Niblack, Professor, A. L. Colgrove, Postdoctoral Research Associate, K. Colgrove, Senior Research Specialist, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; and J. P. Bond, Associate Professor, Department of Plant, Soil and Agricultural Systems, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901 Corresponding author: T. L. Niblack. tniblack@uiuc.edu Niblack, T. L., Colgrove, A. L., Colgrove, K., and Bond, J. P. 2008. Shift in virulence of soybean cyst nematode is associated with use of resistance from PI 88788. Online. Plant Health Progress doi:10.1094/php-2008-0118-01-rs. Abstract The soybean cyst nematode (SCN) is the most economically important pathogen of soybean in the United States. Most of the SCN-resistant cultivars being grown in this region have resistance derived from a single source, Plant Introduction (PI) 88788. A survey conducted in 2005 showed that 83% of the soybean hectarage in Illinois is infested with SCN, with average population densities high enough to cause significant yield suppression (2,700 eggs/100 cm³ soil). Further characterization of these populations showed that 70% have adapted to PI 88788 at some level, reducing the effectiveness of using SCN-resistant cultivars as a crop management tool. Rotation with alternative sources of resistance is recommended as a means to slow the adaptation to PI 88788. Introduction Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, commonly known as the soybean cyst nematode (SCN), causes significant soybean yield suppression in many soybeanproducing countries (14) and is the most economically important pathogen of soybean in the United States (15). First identified in the US in North Carolina in 1954 (12), SCN has since been found in most soybean production areas of this country (5). In 1999, 82% of the soybean fields in Illinois were reported to be infested with SCN (13). The primary measurable effect of infection by SCN is yield reduction in the absence of symptoms (11) (Fig. 1), although chlorosis and stunting may occur if nematode population densities are high or infection is associated with one or more secondary problems such as nutrient deficiency or root rot (5) (Fig. 2). Fig. 1. SCN-resistant and susceptible soybean cultivars growing in a replicated yield trial near Urbana, IL, in a field infested with ca. 10,000 SCN eggs/100 cm³ soil. Note the absence of obvious visible symptoms. Fig. 2. Visible symptoms on soybean plants heavily infested with soybean cyst nematode, and also exhibiting evidence of root rotting, in Champaign County, IL in 2007.

The most effective and typical means of managing soybean in SCN-infested fields involve host resistance and nonhost rotation (7). Nonhost rotation, usually to maize in Illinois, effectively decreases SCN population densities (4) and has few economic disadvantages. The use of host resistance is more problematic, because complete resistance to SCN has not been found or engineered, and the nematode readily adapts to resistance (5). Genes for resistance to SCN may be found in numerous accessions in the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection (1), seven of which have actually been used in breeding programs directed at SCN management (6). Of these seven, only Plant Introduction (PI) 548402 (sometimes referred to as Peking ) and PI 88788 have been used to much extent in commercially-available soybean cultivars, although an increasing number of cultivars are available with resistance genes derived from PI 437654. These three PIs are used as indicator plants for SCN virulence profiling by means of the Illinois SCN Type test (5). In 1991, a survey was conducted in Illinois to determine the level of adaptation of SCN field populations to resistance in soybean (10). At that time, adaptation was measured by means of a race test (3,9), a greenhouse bioassay in which the nematode s ability to develop on a set of four resistant soybean lines was compared with its ability to develop on a standard susceptible line, the cultivar Lee. The objective of the 1991 survey was to determine the percentage of SCN populations that could be described as "race 3," defined as those without the ability to develop on any of the four differentials in other words, those that could be managed through the use of any SCN-resistant cultivar. By 2005, over 90% of the SCN-resistant cultivars available in Illinois (and surrounding states) were derived from a single source, PI 88788. We conducted a preliminary study of Illinois SCN Types in southern Illinois to determine whether a shift in virulence phenotypes had occurred, because cultivars with SCN resistance derived from PI 88788 have been used since the 1980s in that part of the state. Following the preliminary study, we conducted a survey of soybean fields throughout Illinois during 2005 and virulence phenotyping in 2005-2006 in order to determine whether the consistent use of this single source of resistance has resulted in an increase in the percentage of SCN populations that are adapted to PI 88788. This is important information for managing SCN, because if a population can parasitize PI88788, then it can parasitize any cultivar derived from PI 88788 (5). Preliminary Study of Virulence Phenotypes in Southern Illinois During 2003, soil samples were collected from arbitrarily-selected fields in southern Illinois in order to determine the distribution of southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. The samples were processed for SCN as well as M. incognita, and 28 of those found to be positive for SCN were subjected to Illinois SCN Type tests. The materials and methods were described previously (6), with the exception that the infestation level was 2,500 eggs/100 cm³ soil. The results (Table 1) showed that 82% of the SCN populations tested were able to develop on PI 88788, which demonstrated that adaptation to this source of resistance had occurred in southern Illinois, and encouraged us to survey the entire state.

Table 1. Virulence phenotypes (Illinois SCN Types) of soybean cyst nematode populations collected during a preliminary survey in southern Illinois in 2003. Number of samples Mean number of females on Lee 74 5 124-316 (218) 17 113-403 (277) 6 127-308 (203) PI 548402 0-9 (3) 0-8 (3) 10-31 (17) Female Indices x PI 88788 2-9 (7) 17-37 (27) 13-52 (32) PI 437654 Illinois SCN type y Percentage of total samples x The Female Index (FI) is a measurement of the ability of a SCN population to develop on a resistant soybean line. It is calculated from a replicated bioassay as the mean number of SCN females produced on an indicator line (in this case, PI 548402, 88788, or 437654) divided by the mean number of females produced on the standard susceptible cultivar Lee 74, multiplied by 100. Hyphenated numbers in these columns give the range of female numbers or FI values for each Illinois SCN Type observed, and parenthetical numbers directly below the ranges are the overall means for the SCN Type. y The Illinois SCN Type is determined by the ability of the nematode population to produce FI values greater than 10 on each of three indicator lines, PI 548402, 88788, or 437654. A Type 0 cannot develop on any of the three; a Type 1 develops on PI 548402, a Type 2 on PI 88788, and a Type 4 on PI 437654 (there is no Type 3 in this test, although there is in the full HG Type test). A Type 1.2 develops on both PI 548402 and 88788. Distribution and Population Densities of SCN Populations The purpose of this part of the survey was to verify that our sampling method would result in reliable data, by comparison with results obtained with the areaframe sampling method employed by Workneh et al. (13). We assigned soil sampling sites in the laboratory in the following manner: we arbitrarily divided the State of Illinois into six sections by drawing a line longitudinally through a state map, and dividing each half into thirds horizontally. We identified roads (excluding controlled-access highways) transecting each section and generated arbitrary GPS coordinates (Fig. 3) along each road with Mapsource software (Garmin International, Olathe, KS). 0 (0) 0-6 (0) 0-2 (0) 0 18 2 61 1.2 21 Fig. 3. Map of Illinois showing the locations of survey sample sites in six arbitrarily-designated sections (differentiated by contiguous dots of the same color) of the state. Soil samples were collected at these locations for analysis of soybean cyst nematode populations in 2005.

During July and August 2005, we traveled to each section, completing the sampling for that section in 1 day if possible. To collect samples, we stopped at each previously-identified GPS coordinate, and if a soybean field was accessible from that location, we entered the field and collected approximately 1 liter soil with 2.5-cm-diameter soil probes by combining individual cores taken to a depth of ca. 15 cm from arbitrarily-selected points in an area no larger than 0.4 hectares. Symptoms of disease were rarely visible, and the occurrence of soybean aphids and other insects was noted but infrequent. We collected a total of 219 samples, with varying numbers from each section (Table 2). Each sample was stored at 4 C until processed according to the procedure described by Faghihi and Ferris (2). Table 2. Distribution of soybean cyst nematode in soil samples collected during a 2005 survey of Illinois. Statistics were calculated based on samples testing positive for cyst nematodes. Section No. samples collected Positive for cyst nematodes (%) Eggs/100 cm³ soil Mean Median Maximum SD Northwest 32 88 1,933 240 18,720 4,693 Northeast 30 97 2,074 760 8,000 2,745 West Central East Central 56 73 2,864 960 17,680 4,031 40 78 2,849 1,520 36,000 6,293 Southwest 20 95 5,587 1,200 42,800 10,274 Southeast 40 85 1,915 380 13,840 3,215 Overall 218 83 2,700 800 42,800 5,305 We found SCN in 73 to 97% of the samples collected from different regions of Illinois (Table 2). The overall incidence of 83% agreed very well with the estimate of 82% published by Workneh et al. (13), therefore we considered the sampling method to be reasonably reliable. For further evaluation of the results, there are a few facts that should be taken into account. First, although many factors affect the economic injury threshold for SCN, it is generally measured in the hundreds, not thousands, of eggs (5); both the mean and median egg population densities in Illinois are well above the threshold. Second, we have no way to know whether the soybean cultivar growing in a sampled field was SCNresistant or susceptible. In a survey of farmers in early 2007, 62% of farmers reported that they planted SCN-resistant cultivars in 75% or more of their acreage (Niblack, unpublished data; 568 respondents). Finally, we did not do any further testing to verify that the cyst nematodes extracted from the sample were actually H. glycines (8); however, it is highly likely that a cyst nematode found in a soybean field in Illinois is SCN (personal observation), and further evidence for this was provided by the fact that every sample chosen for virulence profiling, as described in the following section, produced females and eggs on a susceptible soybean cultivar, which would not have been the case with the other cyst nematodes known to occur in Illinois. Virulence Profiling Of the 218 samples collected, 156 had high enough egg densities to allow virulence profiling after a brief period of population increase in the greenhouse. The SCN populations in these samples were subjected to virulence profiling during 2005-2006 (Table 3) as described previously (6).

Table 3. Virulence profiles of 156 populations of soybean cyst nematode collected during a 2005 survey and subjected to the Illinois SCN Type tests. Range of Section of Illinois No. SCN Type x samples (frequency) Development y FI z on PI 88788 on PI 88788 tested 0 1 2 1.2 4 (%) Min Max Northwest 31 13 0 17 1 0 58 10 35 Northeast 28 12 0 15 1 0 57 13 48 West Central 22 11 0 11 0 0 50 11 27 East Central 23 1 2 20 0 0 87 10 55 Southwest 20 1 0 15 4 0 95 10 52 Southeast 32 7 0 21 4 0 78 11 98 Overall 156 45 2 99 10 0 70 10 98 x The Illinois SCN Type is determined by the ability of the nematode population to develop (see definitions in footnotes b and c) on three indicator lines, PI 548402, 88788, or 437654. A Type 0 cannot develop on any of the three; a Type 1 develops on PI 548402, a Type 2 on PI 88788, and a Type 4 on PI 437654 (there is no Type 3 in this test, although there is in the full HG Type test). A Type 1.2 develops on both PI 548402 and 88788. y Development is considered positive when the FI (defined in footnote c) is 10 or higher. z FI = Female Index, a measurement of the ability of a SCN population to develop on a resistant soybean line. It is calculated from a replicated bioassay as the mean number of SCN females produced on an indicator line divided by the mean number of females produced on the standard susceptible cultivar Lee 74, multiplied by 100. These results show clearly that most of the SCN populations in Illinois have adapted to some extent to PI 88788. Very few populations were able to develop on PI 548402 (SCN Types 1 and 1.2), and none were found that could develop on PI 437654 (SCN Type 4) during this survey (although 30% of the populations were able to produce one or more viable females on this PI; Colgrove and Niblack, unpublished data). Cultivars with resistance derived from PI 437654 are not yet deployed widely in Illinois. A graphical comparison of the results of the survey conducted by Sikora & Noel in 1990 (10) and the results of our survey show a distinct virulence shift (Fig. 4). This shift has most likely been due to the widespread planting in Illinois of SCN-resistant cultivars derived from PI 88788.

Fig. 4. Comparison of the results of surveys of soybean cyst nematode populations in Illinois. The 1991 data were reported by Sikora and Noel (10) as "races," and were expressed here as Illinois SCN Types (6) in order to make the comparison clearer. Conclusions and Recommendations Despite the common use of nonhost rotation and host resistance to reduce the impact of the pathogen, SCN population densities remain at levels capable of causing significant yield loss in Illinois. The lack of obvious symptoms reduces recognition of the extent of SCN infestations, and the adaptation of SCN populations to most resistant cultivars reduces their effectiveness in alleviating damage. However, this survey showed that most populations of SCN in Illinois have not adapted to PI 548402 or 437654, so the option to use these sources of resistance remains open and should be encouraged, especially when SCN population densities are high. The use of alternative sources of resistance will benefit farmers with heavy infestations of SCN Type 2 (HG Type 2- ) in the short term. For the long term, we recommend rotation of sources of resistance to slow the nematodes adaptation to resistance and preserve the utility of alternative sources (6). We also encourage continuing research to identify new sources and approaches to SCN resistance. Acknowledgments This research was supported by the Illinois Soybean Association, the Soybean Disease Biotechnology Center, and the North Central Soybean Research Program. We thank Greg Noel for useful discussions. We also thank Kimberly Skukas and Travis Hurt for technical assistance, T. A. Jackson for the photograph used as Figure 1, and M. Greifenkamp for preparing Figure 3. Literature Cited 1. Diers, B. W., Skorupska, H. T., Rao-Arelli, A. P., and Cianzio, S. R. 1997. Genetic relationships among soybean plant introductions with resistance to soybean cyst nematodes. Crop Sci. 37:1966-1972. 2. Faghihi, J., and Ferris, J. M. 2000. An efficient new device to release eggs from Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 32:411-413.

3. Golden, A. M., Epps, J. M., Riggs, R. D., Duclos, L. A., Fox, J. A., and Bernard, R. L. 1970. Terminology and identity of infraspecific forms of the soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Plant Dis. Rep. 54:544-546. 4. Jackson, T. A., Smith, G. S., and Niblack, T. L. 2005. Heterodera glycines infectivity and egg viability following nonhost crops and during overwintering. J. Nematol. 37:259-264. 5. Niblack, T. L. 2005. Soybean cyst nematode management reconsidered. Plant Dis. 89:1020-1026. 6. Niblack, T. L., Arelli, P. R., Noel, G. R., Opperman, C. H., Orf, J. H., Schmitt, D. P., Shannon, J. G., and Tylka, G. L. 2002. A revised classification scheme for genetically diverse populations of Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 34:279-288. 7. Niblack, T. L., and Chen, S. 2004. Cropping systems. Page 181-206 in: Biology and Management of the Soybean Cyst Nematode, 2nd edn. D. P. Schmitt, J. A. Wrather, and R. D. Riggs, eds. Schmitt & Assoc., Marceline, MO. 8. Niblack, T. L., Wrather, J. A., Heinz, R. D., and Donald, P. A. 2003. Distribution and virulence phenotypes of Heterodera glycines in Missouri. Plant Dis. 87:929-932. 9. Riggs, R. D., and Schmitt, D. P. 1988. Complete characterization of the race scheme for Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 20:392-395. 10. Sikora, E. J., and Noel, G. R. 1991. Distribution of Heterodera glycines races in Illinois. J. Nematol. 23:624-628. 11. Wang, J., Niblack, T. L., Tremain, J. A., Wiebold, W. J., Tylka, G. L., Marrett, C. C., Noel, G. R., Myers, O., and Schmidt, M. E. 2003. Soybean cyst nematode reduces soybean yield without causing obvious aboveground symptoms. Plant Dis. 87:623-628. 12. Winstead, N. N., Skotland, C. B., and Sasser, J. N. 1955. Soybean-cyst nematode in North Carolina. Plant Dis. Rep. 39:9-11. 13. Workneh, F., Tylka, G. L., Yang, X. B., Faghihi, J., and Ferris, J. M. 1999. Regional assessment of soybean brown stem rot, Phytophthora sojae, and Heterodera glycines using area-frame sampling: prevalence and effects of tillage. Phytopathol. 89:204-211. 14. Wrather, J. A., Anderson, T. R., Arsyad, D. M., Tan, Y., Portapuglia, A., Ram, H. H., and Yorinori, J. T. 2001. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybeanproducing countries in 1998. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 23:115-121. 15. Wrather, J. A., and Koenning, S. R. 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. J. Nematol. 38:173-180.