NordiQC External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry

Similar documents
The impact of proficiency testing on lab immunoassays

Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry: Experiences from NordiQC

10 years of NordiQC Why are 30% of labs still getting it wrong?

External Quality Assessment of Breast Marker Analysis. NordiQC data

NordiQC - update

Optimization of antibodies, selection, protocols and controls Breast tumours

Breast cancer: Antibody selection, protocol optimzation controls and EQA

Breast cancer: IHC classification. Mogens Vyberg Professor of Clinical Pathology Director of NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

HER2 ISH (BRISH or FISH)

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Immunohistochemical classification of lung carcinomas and mesotheliomas. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Product Introduction. Product Codes: HCL029, HCL030 and HCL031. Issue

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

Assessment Run GATA3

Assessment Run B HER-2 IHC. HER-2/chr17 ratio**

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Lung Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (lu-alk)

Assessment Run C1 2017

Assessment Run B HER-2

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)

Assessment Run B HER2 IHC

Estrogen receptor (ER)

Quality Control/Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry

Assessment Run NKX3.1 (NKX3.1)

Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control

SMH (Myosin, smooth muscle heavy chain)

Immunohistochemical principles The technical test approach. Pre-analytical parametres

Product Introduction

Immunohistochemistry. Potential and challenges To be or not to be

Assessment Run

Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)

Immunohistochemical classification of the unknown primary tumour (UPT) Part I. Prof. Mogens Vyberg NordiQC Institute of Pathology Aalborg, Denmark

Assessment Run C3 2018

The unkown primary tumour: IHC Classification, antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA (part I)

Epithelial cell-cell adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM)

Diagnostic IHC in lung and pleura pathology

# Best Practices for IHC Detection and Interpretation of ER, PR, and HER2 Protein Overexpression in Breast Cancer

Welcome! HER2 TESTING DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY 4/11/2016

The unknown primary tumour: IHC classification part I, the primary panel - Antibody selection, protocol optimization, controls and EQA

Quality Indicators - Anatomic Pathology- HSC/STC Jul-Sep 2 nd Qtr. Apr-Jun 1 st Qtr

IHC Stainer platforms. Overview, pros and cons

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) Assessment run

Image analysis in IHC overview, considerations and applications

External Quality Assessment of melanocytic marker analyses NordiQC experience

Quality assurance and quality control in pathology in breast disease centers

Assessment Run CK19

Single and Multiplex Immunohistochemistry

Quality in Control. ROS1 Analyte Control. Product Codes: HCL022, HCL023 and HCL024

PD-L1 Analyte Control DR

Immunotherapy in NSCLC Pathologist role

Quality Assurance and Quality Control in the Pathology Dept.

Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4)

HistoCyte Laboratories Ltd

The Challenges of Implementing a PD-L1 Proficiency Testing Program in Australia

Classification of the unknown primary tumour: the primary IHC panel

Quality in Control ALK-Lung Analyte Control (EML4-ALK) ALK-Lymphoma Analyte Control (NPM-ALK)

Assessment performed on Friday, September 18, 2015, at Vancouver General Hospital

Workflow. Connecting the Pieces For Total Patient Care

COMPUTER-AIDED HER-2/neu EVALUATION IN EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE (EQA) OF BREAST CANCER SCREENING PROGRAMME

Guideline. Associated Documents ASCO CAP 2018 GUIDELINES and SUPPLEMENTS -

Interpretation Guide. Product Name: ALK Cell Line Analyte Control Product Codes: ALK2/CS and ALK2/CB. Page 1 of 9

Kristen E. Muller, DO, Jonathan D. Marotti, MD, Vincent A. Memoli, MD, Wendy A. Wells, MD, and Laura J. Tafe, MD

The following slides were presented at the TIGA Workshop, and are enclosed in the PP show format (*.pps) in order to include all presented details.

Speaking to you. This statement by Dr. Rodney T. Miller, Director of

Assessment performed on Tuesday, July 29, 2014, at Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver

Version 2 of these Guidelines were drafted in response to published updated ASCO/CAP HER2 test Guideline Recommendations-

Immunohistochemistry in Breast Pathology- Brief Overview of the Technique and Applications in Breast Pathology

Breast cancer diagnostic solutions Deliver diagnostic confidence

Novocastra Liquid Mouse Monoclonal Antibody Myeloperoxidase

FAQs for UK Pathology Departments

Supplementary Appendix

Digital Pathology and CAP Guidelines

Milestones in Her 2 Testing

DOUBLE STAINS. Toll-Free: Direct:

CIHRT Exhibit P-1830 Page 1

Overview of the ESP Lung and Colon EQA schemes with a focus on Dutch laboratories

Immunohistochemical Expression of Hormone Receptors and The Histological Characteristics of Biochemically Hormone Receptor Negative Breast Cancers

Supplementary Online Content

CANCER. Clinical Validation of Breast Cancer Predictive Markers

Brief Formalin Fixation and Rapid Tissue Processing Do Not Affect the Sensitivity of ER Immunohistochemistry of Breast Core Biopsies

Immune Cell Phenotyping in Solid Tumors using Quantitative Pathology

Vernieuwing en diagnostiek bij NSCLC: Immunotherapy: PD-L1 analyse: waar staan we

What is HER2 positive breast cancer in 2018? Updated ASCO-CAP guidelines. Giuseppe Viale University of Milan European Institute of Oncology

Evolution of Pathology

HSL-Advanced Diagnostics 2018 / 19 Test & Service List

Gaining New Insights Through IF Multiplexed Staining and Analysis. Tyna Hope, Ph.D. P.Eng Biomarker Imaging Research Laboratory October 5, 2017

Central Pathology Review and Tissue MicroArrays. Dr Lisa Storer Children s Brain Tumour Research Centre Nottingham

The Effect of Delay in Fixation, Different Fixatives, and Duration of Fixation in Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Results in Breast Carcinoma

Reviewer's report. Version: 1 Date: 24 May Reviewer: Cathy Moelans. Reviewer's report:

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES BREAST PATHOLOGY

Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Pathology. AGO e. V. in der DGGG e.v. sowie in der DKG e.v.

Aspects of quality in breast pathology. Andrew Lee Nottingham University Hospitals

Biomarcatori per la immunoterapia: cosa e come cercare Paolo Graziano

Quantitative Image Analysis of HER2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer

SOMAPLEX REVERSE PHASE PROTEIN MICROARRAY HUMAN KIDNEY TUMOR & NORMAL TISSUE

Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA 2

ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow immunohistochemistry

07/06/2013. Commentary. The best way to achieve optimal treatment of today s patients is to ensure the availability of

Transcription:

NordiQC External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry Mogens Vyberg Professor of Clinical Pathology Director of NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

AALBORG (~ 200.000 inhabitants)

Aalborg University Hospital Institute of Pathology

Serial sections stained for Estrogen receptor Lab. A Lab. B Optimally processed ductal breast carcinoma tissue

Serial sections stained for Estrogen receptor High expressor Lab. A Lab. B Low expressor False neg.

Serial sections stained for Estrogen receptor Tonsil Uterine cervix Controls Lab. A Lab. B False neg. 10

Serial sections stained for Estrogen receptor Tonsil Uterine cervix Controls Clone SP1/EP1/1D5 in 225 labs Clone 6F11 in 15/37 labs External Quality Assurance! False pos. 11

External Quality Assurance ER correct false negative Through the inquiry, the public learned that between 1997 and 2005 nearly 400 of about 1,000 breast cancer patients received incorrect test results of the ER status of their breast tumors. Control 12 Craig Allred

The challenge of IHC Suboptimal IHC assays may be due to: Preanalytical issues Fixation too short, too late, decalcification too soon Analytical issues: Less successful / too dilute antibody clones/rtus Insufficient epitope retrieval Insensitive visualization systems Platform problems Post-analytical issues Should be identified with proper controls Interpretation criteria, interobserver variation

Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control 14 International organization for proficiency testing of IHC Founded 2003 by Nordic pathologists Independent, scientific, not-for-profit organisation Institute of Pathology, Aalborg University Hospital, DK General module: 3 runs/year 15-18 different marker challenges Breast cancer IHC module: 2 runs/y HER-2, ER/PR, Ki67/E-Cad HER-2 ISH module: 2 runs/year BRISH, FISH Companion module: 2 runs/year PD-L1 www.nordiqc.org

Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control Free PMC Article

Nordic immunohistochemical Quality Control 800 700 NordiQC Participants 600 500 400 300 200 100 Nordic labs 0 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015-18

WWW.NORDIQC.ORG FREE ACCESS

WWW.NORDIQC.ORG 18

WWW.NORDIQC.ORG Participant site 20

Test material Multi-tissue FFPE blocks 10% NBF 24-48 h (ASCO/CAP guidelines ) Normal and clinically relevant tumour tissues Different levels of antigen expression high, moderate, low, none 2 unstained slides for each marker send to the participants 1 stained slide returned for central assessment

Test material 22 The slide to be stained for Bcl-6 comprised: 1-2. Tonsils, 24 h/48 h 3. Follicular lymphoma, grade I 4. Follicular lymphoma, grade II 5. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma HE NE LE Tissue selection: High Expressor to confirm antibody Low Expressor to ensure sensitivity No-Expressor to ensure specificity

Open website

PDF file e-mailed to participants with assessment marks and when needed explanations and recommendations 24

NordiQC assessment results 2006 2015 General module ~ 20,000 slides ( ~100.000 core sections) Insufficient 32% 21% 11% 33% 35% Optimal Good Borderline Poor { too weak / false neg.: ~ 90% Insuff. over-stained / false pos.: ~ 10%

NordiQC assessment results 2006 2015 Breast cancer module ~ 9,000 slides (~35,000 core sections) Insufficient 21% 9% 12% 21% 58% Optimal Good Borderline Poor { too weak / false neg.: ~ 90% Insuff. over-stained / false pos.: ~ 10%

NordiQC general results 2006 2015 Major causes of insufficient stains in ~ 9,000 slides Less successful antibodies/rtus 17 % Inappropriate antibody dilution 20 % Inappropriate epitope retrieval 27 % Inappropriate detection kit 19 % Other inappropriate lab. performance 17 % Endogenous biotin reaction Section drying-out after HIER Technical platform error.... Unexplained 27

IHC Biomarker controls Go for Low antigen expressors ~ Critical Assay Performance Controls (CAPCs) essential to evaluate sensitivity essential to assure consistency Normal tissues - easier to ensure the quality 90 % of insufficient staining results in EQA are caused by weak/false negative results often related to the use of inappropriate positive tissue controls...

Publications AIMM 2014, 22:241 AIMM 2015, 23:1

AIMM 2016-17

NordiQC EQA: Estrogen Receptor in 13 runs 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 45% 70 Participants 122 141 197 87% 281 30 20 10 0 8 10 13 B1 B3 B5 B7 B8 B10 B11 B13 B15 B17 PASS RATE (%)

NordiQC EQA ER Estrogen receptor Antibody clone selection SP1 6F11 1D5 EP1 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

IHC Optimal performance ER 1D5 1:100 HIER Ci ph 6 2-step polymer 3-step polymer

Results of NordiQC recommendations Pass rate (optimal + good) by participant status Estrogen receptor New participants Old participants Run 10, 2004 57% 71% Run B15, 2010 70% 86% Run B19, 2015 51% 73% Average 59% 77%

HER-2 staining results in 17 runs

NordiQC runs for HER2 IHC 36 CK7 * * Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 1+ Unampl. 1+ Unampl. 0 36

NordiQC runs for HER2 IHC 37 CK7 Optimal Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 2+ Unampl. 0 Poor Ampl. 3+ Ampl. 2+ Unampl. 3+ Unampl. 1 37

NordiQC runs for HER2 IHC Every $1 saved by laboratories by using cheaper reagents could potentially result in approximately $6 additional costs to the healthcare system.

Lung ALK 5A4 ALK1 ALCL Optimal Lung adenocarcinoma Poor

Lung ALK The immunoassay must fit for the purpose: Identify the antibody useful for the specific task The right external controls must be used: Tissue with high epitope expression to identify the right antibody Appendix Appendix - ALK Tissue with low epitope expression to assure the sensitivity: ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma Tissue with no epitope expression to assure the specificity e.g., liver

Lung ALK run 45, 176 labs 5A4 ALK1 Appendix Optimal Poor Lung adenocarcinoma

Results of NordiQC recommendations 419 advices for 11 markers No. Improved % Positive 268 195 73 Negative 151 21 14 42

Perspective Almost 1/3 of all IHC stains produced by NordiQC participants are still insufficient! New labs New antibodies, techniques, platforms Increasing demands How many IHC stains produced by labs not participating in an EQA scheme are insufficient? How many scientific publications are based on insufficient IHC stains? What are the consequences for the patients?

When you believe in automation and stop thinking

NordiQC External Quality Assurance in Immunohistochemistry Mogens Vyberg Professor of Clinical Pathology Director of NordiQC Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark