An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results. Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St.

Similar documents
SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis One-Year Outcomes

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes at 30 Days with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR System in Inoperable, High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk AS Patients

TAVR SPRING 2017 The evolution of TAVR

1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD

The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)Program at Southcoast Health. Adam J. Saltzman, MD Cardiovascular Care Center

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

TAVR today: High Risk, Intermediate Risk Population, and Valve in Valve Therapy

TAVR IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS

Interventional Updates 2016

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. SSVQ November 23, 2012 Centre Mont-Royal 15:40

TAVI: The Real Deal? Marc Pelletier, MD Head, Department of Cardiac Surgery New Brunswick Heart Centre

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

TAVI After PARTNER-2 : The Hamilton Approach

Aortic Stenosis: Open vs TAVR vs Nothing

Le TAVI pour tout le monde?

TAVI: Present and Future Perspective

Progress In Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

THE PERCUTANEOUS MANAGEMENT OF VALVULAR HEART DISEASE DR JOHN RAWLINS CONSULTANT INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGIST UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON

Valve Replacement without a Scalpel Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) Charles T. Klodell, M.D.

Transcatheter Valve Replacement: Current State in 2017

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

2/15/2018 DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES. Consultant for BioSense Webster, a J&J Co. Aortic stenosis background. Short history of TAVR

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Evolving and Expanding Indications for TAVR

Aortic stenosis (AS) remains the most common

2/28/2010. Speakers s name: Paul Chiam. I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: NONE. Antegrade transvenous transseptal route

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FAPSIC. Monash HEART, Monash Health & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

Igor Palacios, MD Director of Interventional Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

Is TAVR Now Indicated in Even Low Risk Aortic Valve Disease Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic valve stenosis with the ACURATE neo2 valve system: 30-day safety and performance outcomes

TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Valve See the Clinical Difference. Name: Title: Date:

Edwards Transcatheter AVR: Have the Outcomes Changed after CE Approval?

Transcatheter procedures of the future; expanding the treatment options for patients with severe aortic stenosis

SAPIEN 3 Sizing Considerations:

TAVR in Intermediate Risk Populations /Optimizing Systems for TAVR

The Future of TAVR: Minimalist Fast Track

Aortic Stenosis Background and Breakthroughs in Treatment: TAVR Update

Transcatheter Therapies For Aortic Valve Disease. March 2017 Brian Whisenant MD

The Future of Medicine. Who to TAVR? Azeem Latib MD EMO-GVM Centro Cuore Columbus and San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy

PARTNER 2A & SAPIEN 3: TAVI for intermediate risk patients

TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

After PARTNER 2A/S3i and SURTAVI: What is the Role of Surgery in Intermediate-Risk AS Patients?

Aortic Stenosis and TAVR TARUN NAGRANI, MD INTERVENTIONAL AND ENDOVASCULAR CARDIOLOGIST, SOMC

Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The PARTNER Trial

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current and Future Devices: How do They Work, Eligibility, Review of Data

Update on Percutaneous Therapies for Structural Heart Disease. William Thomas MD Director of Structural Heart Program Tucson Medical Center

How Do I Evaluate a Patient Being Considered for TAVR? Sunday, February 14, :00 11:25 PM 25 min

The SAPIEN 3 TAVI Advantage

30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

TAVI in Rabin Medical Center -

Conflicts of interests

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

30-day Outcomes of The CENTERA Trial a New Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. Didier Tchétché, MD On Behalf of the CENTERA Investigators

TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Valve. See the Clinical Difference

Edwards Sapien. Medtronic CoreValve. Inoperable FDA approved High risk: in trials. FDA approved

Prince Sultan Cardiac Center Experience Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI

Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system

Conflicts of interests

Australia and New Zealand Source Registry Edwards Sapien Aortic Valve 30 day Outcomes

TAVR in 2020: What is Next!!!!

TAVI: Nouveaux Horizons

A new option for the Diagnosis and Management of Valvular Heart Disease. Oregon Comprehensive Valve Center

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Management of risks and complications

Disclosures 4/16/2018. What s New in Valvularand Structural Heart Disease. None relevant to the presentation

Trans Catheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Current Evidence in TAVI patients using ACURATE and LOTUS valves

TRANSAPICAL AORTIC VALVE REPAIR

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement TAVR

MITRAL (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter valves)

The Role of TAVI in high-risk and normal-risk Patients

TAVR for low-risk patients in 2017: not so fast.

TAVR Cases. Disclosures 2/17/2018. February 17, :15 3:30 PM 15 min

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

TAVI in Korea, How to Avoid Conduction

Case Presentations TAVR: The Good Bad and The Ugly

TAVI: Transapical Procedures

Stainless Steel. Cobalt-chromium

Aortic Stenosis: Interventional Choice for a 70-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV? Interventional Choice for a 90-year old- SAVR, TAVR or BAV?

Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

Disclosures. Overview. Surgical and TranscatheterAortic Valve Replacement: An Update on a Disruptive Technology 8/31/2016

Percutaneous Aortic Valve Implantation. Core-Valve and Cribier-Edwards Update

Valvular Heart Disease Transcatheter Valve Therapies. October 2016 Brian Whisenant MD

Tissue vs Mechanical What s the Data??

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

TAVR: Review of the Robust Data from Randomized Trials

Disclosures. LGH TAVR: Presentation Outline 2/2/2016. Updates in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) and the LGH Experience

PVL Assessment. Is paravalvular regurgitation after TAVR still an important consideration in 2018?

TAVI- Is Stroke Risk the Achilles Heel of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Repair?

Aortic Valve Stenosis and TAVR: Putting it all together.

Debate: SAVR for Low-Risk Patients in 2017 is Obsolete AVR vs TAVI

Results of Transapical Valves. A.P. Kappetein Dept Cardio-thoracic surgery

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with Evolut-R

TAVR: Intermediate Risk Patients

Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients with Aortic Stenosis: Final Results from the PARTNER 2A Trial

Establishing a New Path Forward for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL CLINICAL RESULTS

Structural Heart Disease Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)

Aortic valve implantation using the femoral and apical access: a single center experience.

TAVR: Echo Measurements Pre, Post And Intra Procedure

Early Experience of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement Results from the Intrepid Global Pilot Study

Transcription:

An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke s Hospital

Disclosures On the speaker s bureau for Endologix, TriVascular, Edwards, Lombard Training courses for: Endologix, Lombard, TriVascular

Edwards THV Program Ascendra 3 System approval SAPIEN XT Valve all access, high-risk indication approval SAPIEN 3 Valve all access, high-risk indication approval June 2015 SAPIEN Valve TF inoperable indication approval SAPIEN Valve TF& TA high-risk indication approval July 2013 June 2014 November 2011 October 2012

SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve 2 3 1 Outer Sealing Skirt Designed to minimize paravalvular leak Frame Design 2 Frame geometry for low delivery profile Cobalt-chromium 1 3 Bovine Pericardial Tissue Enhanced Frame Geometry Large cells on outflow side for coronary access Wide Strut Angles For reduced crimp profile

SAPIEN 3 Valve Sizes Valve Size 20 mm 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm Native Annulus Size By TEE 16-19 mm 18-22 mm 21-25 mm 24-28 mm Native Annulus Area (CT) 273-345 mm 2 338-430 mm 2 430-546 mm 2 540-683 mm 2 Area-derived Diameter (CT) 18.6-21 mm 20.7-23.4 mm 23.4-26.4 mm 26.2-29.5 mm

Evolution of the Edwards Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Valves Cribier- Edwards SAPIEN SAPIEN XT SAPIEN 3 2002 2006 2009 2013

14F or 16F esheath introducer set Low Profile Demonstrated > 50% Reduction in Major Vascular Complications* *PARTNER II Trial high-risk TF SAPIEN 3 valve cohort (VARC II) versus SAPIEN XT valve cohort (VARC I) 30-day results.

Edwards Commander Delivery System Dual articulation for coaxiality Added distal flex to help cross in a variety of anatomies Improved control and precise valve positioning Fine control for valve positioning Distal flex Partial flex Optimal Center Marker Zone (6 mm)

The PARTNER II Trial Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes at 30 Days with the SAPIEN 3 valve in Inoperable, High-Risk AS Patients 29 US Participating Sites Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis ASSESSMENT by Heart Valve Team n = 1076 Patients Intermediate-Risk Operable* SAPIEN 3 2 Single Arm Non-Randomized Historical-Controlled Studies High-Risk Operable / Inoperable (HR) n = 583 Patients ASSESSMENT: Optimal Valve Delivery Access ASSESSMENT: Optimal Valve Delivery Access Transfemoral Transapical / Transaortic Transfemoral (TF) Transapical / Transaortic) TF TAVR SAPIEN 3 TAA TAVR SAPIEN 3 TF TAVR SAPIEN 3 TAA TAVR SAPIEN 3 Valve area < 0.8 cm 2 or valve area index < 0.5 cm 2 /m 2 and mean gradient > 40 mmhg or peak velocity > 4 m/s

Key Inclusion Criteria Inoperable / high-risk STS score 8 or Heart Team determination Severe aortic stenosis determined by echocardiography Valve area < 0.8 cm 2 or valve area index < 0.5 cm 2 /m 2 and mean gradient > 40 mmhg or peak velocity > 4 m/s

Baseline Patient Characteristics SAPIEN 3 Valve HR Patients Average STS = 8.6% (Median 8.4%) Average Age = 82.6yrs TA / TAo, 16% TF, 84% N = 583 Female 42% Male 58% 1.9% 34.3% 38.9% 24.9% 20 mm 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm

Procedural Factors SAPIEN 3 Valve HR (n=583) Post-Dilatation (%) 14.8 >1 Valve Implanted (%) 0.9 Valve Embolization (%) 0.2 IABP During Procedure (%) 0.5 Cardiopulmonary Bypass (%) 2.2 Conscious Sedation (%) 13 Median LOS Days (Min, Max) 5 (1, 33)

All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days 20% PARTNER I Trial and PARTNER II Trial Overall and TF Patients 15% Cardiovascular 1% 10% 5% 6.3% 5.2% 3.7% 4.5% 3.5% 1.6% 0% PARTNER I B (TF) PARTNER I A (All) PARTNER I A (TF) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II HR (TF) 175 344 240 271 282 491 SAPIEN Valve SAPIEN XT Valve SAPIEN 3 Valve

All Strokes at 30 Days 20% PARTNER I Trial and PARTNER II Trial 15% Neurologist Evaluations (Pre- and Post) 10% 7.3% Disabling 0.8% 5% 4.4% 4.1% 4.3% 1.4% 0% PARTNER I B (TF) PARTNER I A (Overall) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II HR (TF) 179 344 271 282 491 SAPIEN Valve SAPIEN XT Valve SAPIEN 3 Valve

NYHA Functional Class (As Treated Patients) 100% 13% 80% IV % 60% 40% 90% III II I 20% 0% SAPIEN 3 Valve HR SAPIEN 3 Valve HR 583 550 Baseline 30 Days

Echocardiographic Findings Mean and Peak Gradients (Valve Implant) 80 75.8 70 Peak Gradient - Overall 60 Mean Gradient - Overall Gradient (mmhg) 50 40 30 45.5 21.2 20 10 11.1 0 Baseline 30 Days No. of Echos Overall 539 506

Paravalvular Leak (At 30 Days - Transfemoral Cohort) 100% 2.5% 0.0% - Severe Percent of Evaluable Echos 80% 60% 40% 20% 36.4% 61.1% 0.1% 0% 30 Day None/Trace Mild Moderate Severe

Moderate / Severe PVL At 30 Days Edwards SAPIEN Valves 50% PARTNER I Trial and PARTNER II Trial 40% 30% 24.2% 20% 10% 12.0% 13.2% 17.3% 2.5% 0% PARTNER I B (TF) PARTNER I A (Overall) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II B (TF) PARTNER II HR (Overall) 179 344 263 280 491 SAPIEN Valve SAPIEN XT Valve SAPIEN 3 Valve

Other Clinical Events at 30 Days (As Treated Patients) Events (%) SAPIEN 3 Valve HR TF (n=491) Major Vascular Comps. 5.3 Disabling Bleeding 5.5 Annular Rupture 0.0 Myocardial Infarctions 0.4 Coronary Obstruction 0.0 Acute Kidney Injury 0.8 New Permanent Pacemaker 13.2 Aortic Valve Re-intervention 0.8 Endocarditis 0.2

The PARTNER II Trial: SAPIEN 3 Valve HR (TF Cohort) Conclusions In high-risk and inoperable patients, the SAPIEN 3 valve demonstrated low mortality and stroke at 30 days: All-cause Mortality: 1.6% Disabling Stroke: 0.8%

What to Expect in the Future? Edwards THV Program SAPIEN Valve TF inoperable indication approval SAPIEN Valve TF and TA high-risk indication approval October 2012 Ascendra 3 System approval July 2013 SAPIEN Valve all access indication approval January 2014 SAPIEN XT Valve all access, high-risk indication approval June 2014 SAPIEN 3 Valve all access, high-risk indication approval June 2015 SAPIEN 3 Valve all access, Intermediate-risk indication approval November 2011

Baseline Patient Characteristics S3i Patients Average STS = 5.3% (Median 5.2%) TAo, 4% N = 1076 TA, 7% Average Age = 81.9yrs TF, 89% Female 38% Male 62% 4.1% 32.2% 43.7% 20.0% 20 mm 23 mm 26 mm 29 mm

Baseline Patient Characteristics Demographics Characteristic (%) S3HR (n=583) S3i (n=1076) NYHA Class III or IV 90.1 72.6 Previous CABG 33.1 28.0 Previous CVA 11.0 8.9 Peripheral Vascular Disease 35.2 28.3 Diabetes 34.5 34.1 COPD - O 2 Dependent 11.7 5.0 CKD - Creat. 2mg/dL 12.0 7.5 Atrial Fibrillation 43.7 36.0 Permanent Pacemaker 16.3 13.2 Frailty 30.9 8.6

Procedural Factors S3HR (n=583) S3i (n=1076) Post-Dilatation (%) 14.8 11.3 >1 Valve Implanted (%) 0.9 0.4 Valve Embolization (%) 0.2 0.1 IABP During Procedure (%) 0.5 0.4 Cardiopulmonary Bypass (%) 1.2 0.6 Conscious Sedation (%) 13 17 Median LOS Days (Min, Max) 5 (1, 33) 4 (1, 64)

Mortality and Stroke: S3i At 30 Days (As Treated Patients) 100 Mortality All-Cause Cardiovascular 100 All Stroke Stroke Disabling 80 80 60 40 O:E = 0.21 (STS 5.3%) % % 60 40 20 20 0 1.1 0.9 S3i 0 2.6 1.0 S3i

All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days Edwards SAPIEN Valves (As Treated Patients) 20% PARTNER I and II Trials Overall and TF Patients 15% 10% 5% 6.3% 5.2% 3.7% 4.5% 3.5% 2.2% 1.6% 1.1% 1.1% 0% P1B (TF) P1A (All) P1A (TF) P2B (TF) P2B XT (TF) S3HR (All) S3HR (TF) S3i (All) S3i (TF) 175 344 240 271 282 583 491 1072 947 SAPIEN SXT SAPIEN 3

All Strokes at 30 Days Edwards SAPIEN Valves 20% PARTNER I and II Trials 15% Neurologist evaluations (pre- and post) 10% 5% 6.7% 5.6% 4.1% 4.3% 1.5% 2.6% 0% P1B (TF) P1A (Overall) P2B (TF) P2B XT (TF) S3HR (Overall) S3i (Overall) 179 344 276 284 583 1076 SAPIEN SAPIEN XT SAPIEN 3

Conclusions (1) In intermediate-risk patients (S3i), SAPIEN 3 was associated with strikingly low mortality and strokes at 30 days: Mortality: 1.1% (TF 1.1%, TA/TAo 1.6%) Disabling Stroke: 1.0%