International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Similar documents
Effect of High-P-Chelated Micronutrient Foliar Spray on Yield and Quality of Chickpea

Dynamics of potassium fractions in a calcareous Vertic Haplustepts under AICRP-LTFE soils

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

EFFECTS OF ZINC AND BORON ON YIELD, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF MUSTARD (BRASSICA JUNCEA L.) IN MUSTARD-MAIZE CROPPING SEQUENCE

RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) TO BALANCED FERTILIZATION UNDER SUB-HUMID SOUTHERN PLAIN ZONE OF RAJASTHAN

Yield and quality of cumin as influenced by FYM enriched micronutrients

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth and yield of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.)

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

Effect of Nutrient Combinations on Plant Pigments and Yield of Bt Cotton Under Rainfed Condition

Effect of Micronutrients Application on Availability of Zn, Fe and B of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) in Inceptisol

Effect of Iron Application and Rhizobium Inoculation on Uptake of Nutrients in Grain and Stover of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Role of Potassium and Sulphur on the Growth, Yield and Oil Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Response of Zinc Fertilization to Wheat on Yield, Quality, Nutrients Uptake and Soil Fertility Grown In a Zinc Deficient Soil Keram, Komal Singh

Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Potassium at Different Crop Growth Stages

RESPONSE OF BIO FERTILIZERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KHARIF PADDY

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Eeffect of biofertilizers and foliar application of organic acids on yield, nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity in soybean

Assessment of Secondary and Micro Nutrient Status under Long-Term Fertilizer Experiment on Vertisol

An Asian Journal of Soil Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (June, 2011) : 11-16

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

Available online at

Soil fertility status and nutrient recommendations based on soil analysis of Jaisalmer district of western Rajasthan

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT IN MUNG BEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L.) THROUGH SULPHUR AND BIOFERTILIZERS

UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY LONG- TERM PHOSPHORUS FERTILIZATION

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth Parameters in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum mill.)

Evaluation of Suitable Nutrient Management on Dual Purpose Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Crop under New Alluvial Zone (NAZ) of West Bengal, India

Management of Coriander Wilt (Fusarium oxysporium) through Cultural Practices as Organic Amendments and Date of Sowing

Effect of Fe (iron) and Mo (molybdenum) application on the yield and yield parameters of lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.)

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF ZINC AND IRON ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (Allium cepa L.) Abstract

Ni and N sources (Urea and ammonium sulphate) affecting growth, yield and quality in maize plant (Zea mays)

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the third most important

Effect of Different Micronutrients on Turmeric Variety Suranjana in Terai Region of West Bengal, India

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 3, No 1, Copyright by the authors - Licensee IPA- Under Creative Commons license 3.

Assessment of Soil Properties of Central Farm - B - Block of MKV, Parbhani

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

Effect of the graded levels of potassium with recommended NP on soil properties under maize cultivation in alfisols of Mandya, Karnataka

Effect of Boron and Sulphur Application on Plant Growth and Yield Attributes of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Effect of Foliar Application of Zinc and Boron on Fruit Growth, Yield and Quality of Winter Season Guava (Psidium guajava L.)

e- ISSN: p- ISSN: X

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Influence of Different Planting Material and Major Nutrient Application on Yield Attributes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

Effect of nitrogen, zinc and boron on growth, yield attributes and yield of wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh

Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium deficiency on the uptake and mobilization of ions in Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum)

Response of sugarcane to different doses of Zn at various growth stages

Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi , India

Indo Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IAJMR) ISSN:

Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences

Estimating Micronutrient Status and their Relationship with Other Soil Properties of Rewa District in Fiji

The effect of nano-micronutrients seed priming on germinability of Kabuli chickpea

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield Parameters in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.)

ISSN International Journal of Advanced Research (2013), Volume 1, Issue 10, RESEARCH ARTICLE

MANAGEMENT OF COLLAR ROT OF GROUNDNUT THROUGH SEED TREATMENT ABSTRACT

NUTRITION KNOW-HOW P.O. BOX 897 // WILLMAR, MN (800) // WCDST.COM

Effect of different growth regulating compounds on biochemical and quality parameters in greengram

Kinetics of decomposition of wheat straw and mineralisation of micronutrients in zinc-treated rice field

Nutrient Use Strategies for Coconut Based Cropping System in Onattukara Sandy Tract, Kerala

Effect of pruning and different micronutrient on plant growth, fruit yield and quality of Phalsa (Grewia asiatica L.) c.v Sharbati

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2018) 7(9):

Effects of Different Levels of NPK and Sulphur on Growth and Yield Attributes of Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) Cv. Varuna

Effect of Different Levels of Zinc and Sulphur on Yield and Yield Attributing Characters of Indian Mustard

HIND AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTITUTE

Effect of Zinc and Iron Ferti-Fortification on Growth, Pod Yield and Zinc Uptake of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Genotypes

EFFECT OF COPPER LEVELS ON COPPER CONTENT IN SOIL NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX) VARIETIES

3.0 Supplying Nutrients to Crops

The Effect of Zinc Fertilization on Rice Productivity and Economics in Acid Alfisol of Jharkhand, India

Impact of NPK Application on Growth and Yield of Guava cv. Hisar Safeda

Micro Nutrient Evaluation in Soils of Jhabua District of Madhya Pradesh

Effect of organics and inorganic phosphorus on inorganic P-fractions in soil of soy bean (Glycine max L.) crop

QUALITY OF CORMS AS INFLUENCED BY CORM WEIGHT AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF NUTRITION IN GLADIOLUS CV. AMERICAN BEAUTY

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

Utilization of Slop Ash as a Source of Potassium for Corn Grown on the Pakchong Soil Series

NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT FOR BANANA MUSA (AB GROUP) NJALIPOOVAN IN ONATTUKARA SOILS

Total zinc was determined by digesting the soil ZnSO 4

Evaluation of Quality and Nutrient Status of Enriched Compost

TNPSC Chemistry Study Material Fertilizers

Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6 (2): (2014)

Effect of Phosphorous and Zinc Fertilisation on the Productivity of Transplanted Aromatic Rice

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

EFFECT OF ZINC FERTILIZATION ON GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY OF WHEAT GROWN UNDER AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITION OF KYMORE PLATEAU OF MADHYA PRADESH, INDIA

Understanding a Soil Report

Distribution of Micronutrients in Soil of Garhi Tehsil, Banswara District of Rajasthan, India

Distribution of Available Macro and Micronutrients in Soils of Dewas District of Madhya Pradesh

Enhancing productivity and quality of fodder maize through soil and foliar zinc nutrition

Enclosed are the tissue analysis results for the samples from the greens at Golf Club.

Available online at

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016,

Response of olive seedlings to foliar sprays with amino acids and some micro elements

Supplying Nutrients to Crops

Effect of Pre-harvest spray of Calcium nitrate, Boric acid and Zinc sulphate on storability of Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco)

Effect of different application method of humic acid on nodulation and seed yield of soybean

Nutritional quality evaluation of Rice bean flour based Boondi

International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN (USA): IJCRGG ISSN: Vol.8, No.4, pp , 2015

BIO-CHEMICAL CHANGES OF NUTRIENTS IN RICE PLANT UNDER SODIC SOILS

RESPONSES OF GARLIC TO ZINC, COPPER, BORON AND MOLYBDENUM APPLICATION IN GREY TERRACE SOIL OF AMNURA SOIL SERIES

Department of Agronomy, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Faizabad (Uttar Pradesh), India. 2

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF DTPA-EXTRACTABLE MICRONUTRIENTS IN SOILS OF CUMBUM VALLEY, TAMIL NADU

Transcription:

International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 5, 2016, 3172 3176 ISSN 2278-3687 (O) 2277-663X (P) SOIL APPLICATION OF POTASSIUM AND SULPHUR AND EFFECT ON GROWTH AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum L.) UNDER SOUTH SAURASHTRA REGION OF GUJARAT Jadeja, A.S., Rajani, A.V., Foram, Chapdiya, Kaneriy A, S.C. and Kavar, N.R. Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh 362-001 (Gujarat), India E-mail: jadejaamardipsinh99@gmail.com Abstract: An field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during rabi season of 2014-15 to evaluate soil application of potassium and sulphur and effect on growth and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under south Saurashtra region of Gujarat. The experiment comprising of four levels of potassium viz., 0, 40, 60 and 80 kg K 2 O ha -1 and sulphur viz., 0, 20, 40, 60 kg S ha -1 and experiment was laid out in Factorial Randomized Block Design and replicated thrice. The results revealed that the growth, yield attributes and yields were significantly influenced by the various levels of potassium and sulphur. The application of potassium 60 and 80 kg K 2 O ha -1 and sulphur 40 and 60 kg S ha -1 significantly increased the plant height, number of primary and secondary branches per plant, pods per plant, numbers of nodules, 100-seed weight, seed and stover yield. Keywords: Cicer arietinum, Potassium, Sulphur. INTRODUCTION India is one of the major pulses growing country of the world, accounting roughly for one third of total world area under pulse cultivation and one fourth of total world production. Pulses occupy a key position in Indian diet and meet about 30 per cent of the daily protein requirement. Among the pulses; chickpea is a most important Rabi crop with high acceptability and wider use. India is the largest producer of chickpea in the world sharing 71.08 and 71.51 per cent of total area (11.55 m ha) and production (10.46 m tonnes), respectively (Singh, 2011). The medium black calcareous soils of Saurashtra region in Gujarat are tended to decline in available potassium due to intensive cropping and gradually shifted towards negative K balance. The decreasing K availability in calcareous soil because of dominant black clay might be due to Ca +2 which limits the chances of K absorption. Simultaneously, the balance application of potassium not only gave higher yield but also improved the quality of economic produced. Sulphur plays an important role in enhancing the productivity and Received Sep 8, 2016 * Published Oct 2, 2016 * www.ijset.net

3173 Jadeja, A.S., Rajani, A.V., Foram, Chapdiya, Kaneriy A, S.C. and Kavar, N.R. quality of chickpea. The importance of S in balance plant nutrition is realized with an increasing S deficiency in several areas due to intensive cropping and focus on high yielding varieties. In Gujarat, 17% of soils are deficient in available sulphur (Golakiya and Shobhana 2000). No work has been carried out on the effect of potassium and sulphur in chickpea in Saurashtra region. The potassium increases yield and quality of chickpea whereas, sulphur enhancing the productivity and quality of chickpea. Therefore, an experiment planned to know the effect of potassium and sulphur on yield and quality of chickpea and post harvest soil fertility. MATERIALS AND METHODS The experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm, College of Agriculture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during rabi season of 2014-15. The soil of the experimental field was clayey in texture and alkaline in reaction (ph of 8.06 and EC of 0.41 ds m -1 ). The soil was low in available nitrogen (244.20 kg ha -1 ), medium in available phosphorus (28.80 kg ha -1 ), medium in available potassium (218.45 kg ha -1 ), medium in available sulphur (10.64 ppm), medium in iron (5.24 ppm), high in zinc (0.74 ppm), high in manganese (17.87 ppm) and high in copper (1.26 ppm). The experiment comprised of total sixteen treatment combinations in which four levels of potassium (0, 40, 60 and 80 K 2 O kg ha -1 ) and four levels of sulphur (0, 20, 40 and 60 S kg ha -1 ) were laid out in Randomized Block Design having factorial concept with three replications. The fertilizer application was done with fixed doses of nitrogen at 20 kg ha -1 and phosphorus at 40 kg ha -1. Potassium and sulphur application was done according to the treatments. The nutrients of N, P, K and S were applied by using sources of Urea, DAP, MOP and Cosavate (WG 90% S), respectively. The chickpea variety Gujarat Gram-3 was planted in second week of October with spacing of 45 m 10 m and seed rate of 60 kg ha -1. The crop was raised with all the standard package of practices and protection measures also timely carried out as they required. The experimental data recorded for growth parameters, yield attributes and yield parameters were statistically analyzed for level of significance. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Growth, yield attributes and yields Effect of potassium The data revealed that the maximum plant height (50.93 cm) was obtained with potash application of 60 kg ha -1 which was statistically at par with application of 80 kg ha -1. Maximum number of primary and secondary branches (2.66 and 15.99) per plant was recorded in 60 kg potash per hectare (Table 1). Potassium application increased the

Soil Application of Potassium and Sulphur and.. 3174 availability of nitrogen and phosphorus (Sahai, 2004), which resulted in better plant growth and more number of branches per plant. Nodule formation was maximum with 60 kg being at par with 40 and 80 kg K 2 O per hectare but significantly different with rest of the doses. These findings were also collaborated with Kurdali et al. (2002) in chickpea. A perusal of data (Table 1) revealed that different levels of potassium exerted their significant influence on 100-seed weight and numbers of pods. Application of 60 kg K 2 O ha -1 recorded significantly the higher 100-seed weight (23.57 g) and maximum number of pods per plant (109.75), which was remain statistically at par with 80 kg K 2 O. Similar findings were recorded by Ali et al. (2008) who studied the effect of different potassium levels and reported that the number of pod per plant was influenced significantly by potassium application. Seed yield affected significantly by potassium levels up to the 60 kg ha -1 and beyond that level the differences were remained on par (Table 1). The highest seed yield (2086 kg ha -1 ) was obtained with 60 kg ha -1 K 2 O, which might be due to better attributed to more number of pods per plant and number of seeds per pod. Similar result was concluded by Samiullah and Khan (2003). While, minimum seed yield (1704 kg ha -1 ) was observed with no potash fertilizer. These results are in agreement with those of Ali et al. (2008) and Ganga et al. (2014). EFFECT OF SULPHUR The plant height (Table 1) showed that different levels of sulphur exerted their significant influence on plant height at harvest; the application of 60 kg S ha -1 significantly recorded with the higher plant height of 50.11 cm, which was found statistically at par with 40 kg S ha -1. The application of 40 kg S ha -1 recorded significantly the maximum number of primary branches per plant (2.67) and secondary branches per plant (13.99) at harvest, which was also at par with 60 kg S ha -1 on secondary branches per plant. The application of 40 kg S ha -1 resulted in significantly the higher number of nodules per plant (21.13), which remained at par with 20 kg S ha -1 and 60 kg S ha -1 at 45 DAS. Similar result was also concluded by Surendra and Katiyar (2010), Bhatt and Jain (2012) and Kumar et al. (2014). Like wise, application of 40 kg S ha -1 recorded significantly the higher number of pods per plant (96.33) and 100-seed weight (23.60 g), which was statistically at par with 60 kg S ha -1. Application of 40 kg S ha -1 recorded significantly the highest seed yield (2060 kg ha -1 ), which was remained at par with 20 kg S ha -1 and 60 kg S ha -1. However, application of 60 kg S ha -1 recorded significantly the highest stover yield (5464 kg ha -1 ). This result also in conformity with those of Patel et al. (2013) and Bohra (2014).

3175 Jadeja, A.S., Rajani, A.V., Foram, Chapdiya, Kaneriy A, S.C. and Kavar, N.R. Conclusion It can be concluded that for obtaining higher yield components with better qaulity of chickpea (cv. GJG-3) should be fertilized with potassium 60 kg K 2 O ha -1 or 60 kg K 2 O ha -1 and sulphur 40 kg S ha -1 or 60 kg S ha -1 in medium black calcareous soils of South Saurashtra region of Gujarat. References [1] Ali, A., Malik, M.A., Ahmad, R., Atif, T.S. 2008. Response of chickpea to potassium fertilizer. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 33(1-4): 44-45. [2] Bhatt, R.K.B. and Jain, N.K. 2012. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to sulphur and zinc fertilization. Res. on Crops, 13(2): 760-763. [3] Bohra, R.K.J.S. 2014. Effect of NPKS and Zn application growth, yield, economics and quality of chickpea. Archives. Agro. and Soil Sci., 60(9): 1193-1206. [4] Ganga, N., Singh, R.K., Singh, R.P., Choudhury, S.K. and Upadhyay, P.K. 2014. Effect of potassium level and foliar application of nutrient on growth and yield of late sown chickpea. J. Environment & Ecology, 32: 273-275. [5] Golakiya, B.A. and Shobhana, H.K. 2000. Gujarat nikhetan man Gandhak. Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science, SSGA, pp. 6-7. [6] Kumar, P., Singh, T., Anil, K. and Ram Y. 2014. Effect of fertility levels of nitrogen and sulphur on growth yield and quality of chickpea. Haryana J. Agron., 20(1/2): 80. [7] Kurdali, F., Farid Al-Ain, Shamma, M.A. 2002. Nodulation, dry matter production and N 2 fixation by fababean and chickpea as affected by soil moisture potassium fertilizer. J. Plant Nutr., 25(2): 355-368. [8] Patel, H.R., Patel, H.F., Maheriya, V.D. and Dodia, I.N. 2013. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to sulphur and phosphorus fertilization with and without biofertilizer application. Inter. J. Life Sci., 8(1): 149-152. [9] Sahai, V.N. 2004. Mineral Nutrients. In Fundamentals of Soil (3 rd Edition). Kalyani Publishers, New Dehli, India. pp. 151-155. [10] Samiullah and Khan N.A. 2003. Physiological investigation on interactive effect of P and K on growth and yield of chickpea. Indian J. Plant Physiol., 8(2): 165-170. [11] Singh, N.P. 2011. Project Co-ordinators report 2010-11, AICRP on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), IIPR, Kanpur.

Soil Application of Potassium and Sulphur and.. 3176 [12] Surendra, Ram and Katiyar, T.P.S. 2010. Effect of sulphur and zinc on the seed yield and protein content of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under arid climate. Indian. J. Soil Sci., 4(3): 563-566. Table 1: Effect of potassium and sulfur on growth and yield components in chickpea Treatments Plant height at harvest (cm) Primary branches/plant Secondary branches/ plant Number of nodules/ plant at 45 DAS Number of pod/ plant 100 seed weight (g) Seed yield (kg ha -1 ) Stover yield (kg ha -1 ) Potassium levels (kg K 2 O ha -1 ) K 0 45.78 2.03 9.24 18.50 60.17 22.26 1704 4757 Control K 1 40 47.65 2.22 11.15 20.66 69.17 22.68 1948 5172 K 2 60 50.93 2.66 15.90 21.92 109.75 23.57 2086 5262 K 3 80 49.01 2.65 15.82 21.90 103.33 23.20 2037 5515 S. Em ± 0.83 0.07 0.34 0.29 2.93 0.26 59.86 168.16 C.D. at 5% 2.41 0.19 0.97 0.85 8.45 0.76 172.89 485.68 Sulphur levels (kg S ha -1 ) S 0 Control 47.05 2.07 11.90 20.03 67.92 22.39 1810 4808 S 1 20 47.01 2.33 12.65 20.75 82.58 22.21 1889 5075 S 2 40 49.20 2.67 13.99 21.13 96.33 23.60 2060 5359 S 3 60 50.11 2.50 13.57 21.08 95.58 23.50 2015 5464 S. Em ± 0.83 0.07 0.34 0.29 2.93 0.26 59.89 168.16 C.D. at 5% 2.41 0.19 0.97 0.85 8.45 0.76 172.89 485.68 C.V.% 5.98 9.54 8.92 4.89 11.84 3.67 10.67 11.25