It depends on the site: In Cervix 99%, in Anus ~ 85-90% and in Vulva, Penis ~ 40-50%. True.
|
|
- Melinda Hodge
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Are all high grade lesions caused by HPV, or are there other etiologies? The issue is not if you are infected with HPV high risk, but which of the patients infected with HR hpv would go into progressive disease, since most of the HPV infections clear. It depends on the site: In Cervix 99%, in Anus ~ 85-90% and in Vulva, Penis ~ 40-50%. True. Please define diffuse block staining. Refer to definition on page 1288: p16-positive. In squamous epithelia, this is defined as continuous strong nuclear or nuclear plus cytoplasmic staining of the basal cell layer with extension upward involving at least one third of the epithelial thickness. The latter height restriction is somewhat arbitrary but adds specificity. Note that full-thickness staining or extension into the upper third or upper half is specifically not required to call a specimen positive (see Figures 14 and 15). Focal or patchy nuclear staining is nonspecific and can be seen with reactive squamous metaplasia, as well as low-grade disease (LSIL, IN 1). All other staining patterns, described as cytoplasmic only, wispy, blob-like, puddled, scattered, single cells, and others, are defined as negative (see Figures 16 18). Clearly, the concept of continuous block staining requires adequate tissue size and orientation and should correlate with the area of morphologic concern. Small fragments, tangential cuts, free-floating single cells, and others may lead to more subjective and variable interpretations, but in such cases, the minimum would be that all cells in question are strongly stained and morphologically are already under consideration in the differential diagnosis of a precancerous lesion I will highlight that nuclear p16 immunoreactivity (with or without I agree. cytoplasmic) is important to avoid nonspecificity in interpretation. Do you have to do p16 if biopsy clearly looks like CIN 2 (basaloid proliferation >1/3rd) and Pap shows HSIL cells? More often than not yes, but the HSIL Pap may still trump due to sampling issues as discussed.
2 Is there a particular recommended p16 clone? Can Ki-67 be reliably used if p16 is not available? Addition of Ki67 in conjunction with p16 what is your experience? In other body part the addition of more than one stain can help. Is CIN 1 with p16 equivalent to HSIL for management purposes? Refer to WG4 discussion on page WG4 is highly cognizant of the interplay between medicine and industry in the published literature. Just as the utility of HPV testing for cervical cytology screening and triage was critically tied to the performance characteristics of HPV DNA tests, similar concepts must be applied for biomarker-based tests [162]. On the basis of these considerations, the clinical utility of p16 immunohistochemistry as proposed by WG4 is directly related to the performance characteristics of a particular clone described in the literature and, in some cases, to specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) kits as reported in the literature. Yes. It is slightly less sensitive and if properly interpreted more specific, but harder to interpret (refer to page 1291). On the other hand p16 is widely available. The two together as described in detail at all cut points in Galgano et al add only a few % of marginal performance. Therefore we recommended starting with p16 and using Ki-67 as a back-up or adjudicator of the p16 for potential false negative cases (refer to page 1291). In the context of histology, doing both together routinely on all cases just adds cost. No, refer to WG4 discussion on CIN 1 especially Recommendation 4 (page 1290). This is the number one research issue to come out of LAST. The natural history of CIN 1 adjudicated by p16 is uncertain and critically needs further study (refer to page 1291). R4: WG4 recommends against the use of p16 IHC as a routine adjunct to histologic assessment of biopsy specimens with morphologic interpretations of negative, -IN 1, and IN 3.
3 Since there are some cases of CIN 2 with consensus review that don't stain with p16. From a practical point of view, if you have a case that looks like CIN 2 (not histologically equivocal), but is p16 negative. Do you call it CIN 2 and say p16 is negative so it may behave like CIN 1, or do you downgrade and report as CIN 1 Regarding recommendation #4, what do you do when you have positive staining for p16 but don't appreciate morphologic features on H&E? The criteria of p16 staining in high risk patients with <=CIN 1 morphology seems to be incongruent with the qualifier that the morphology must be high grade. Please clarify. What is the percentage of high-risk HPV infections in p16+ CINI? Recommendation 2 (refer to page 1288) is to strongly consider calling such a lesion LSIL (CIN 1) for management purposes. If you really think is it HSIL, you can do a ki-67 to make sure the p16 is not a false negative. R2: If the pathologist is entertaining an H&E morphologic interpretation of IN 2 (under the old terminology, which is a biologically equivocal lesion falling between the morphologic changes of HPV infection [low grade lesion] and precancer), p16 IHC is recommended to help clarify the situation. Strong and diffuse block positive p16 results support a categorization of precancer. Negative or non-block positive staining strongly favors an interpretation of low grade disease or a non-hpv associated pathology. Make sure one didn t cut into or out of lesion. Otherwise such is really rare, and might be a reason to do a second confirmatory stain, such as KI-67. This is the missed lesion scenario. The area you find to be p16 positive on review has to be at least suggestive of a high grade lesion either through the stain or on H&E re-review (refer to Recommendation 4 on page 1290). We know from ALTS that ~80-85% of LSIL is HR HPV positive. Ergo I would expect the fraction of p16 + CIN 1 to be even higher, perhaps well above 90%, although I cannot cite you an article specifically on this.
4 If I am on the fence on whether a bx is CIN 1 or CIN 2 is it recommended I use p16? In regard to the recommendation to perform p16 on cases that are CIN 1 vs. CIN 2, is there any concern that in cases with strong diffuse p16, there is no way to distinguish a true HSIL from an ugly p16-positive LSIL? Or are these two entities considered sufficiently biologically similar to not be a concern? 1. In cases of biopsies with morphology of CIN 1 or less, in a patient with high risk factors (as mentioned in the webinar), the recommendation is for performance of p16 immunostaining. However, this is confusing, because there seems to be a qualifier (asterisk) that the morphology should still be high grade! Could you please expand on this and clear up this confusion for me. 2. In cases of professional disagreement between CIN 2 and CIN 3 morphology, the recommendation appears to be for performance of p16 immunostaining. However, the webinar data indicates that up to 77% CIN 2 cases can be p16 positive and up to 99% CIN 3 cases are positive. How does p16 positivity separate these two groups? Yes, the interface of CIN 1-2 is a good use of p16. If the p16 is negative it is much more likely CIN 1. If it is positive, it is twice as likely to be HSIL vs LSIL. The cytology and other data that led to the biopsy can also help. But here I would emphasize that it is not an easy CIN 1 you are talking about, but one where you are struggling to decide on the grade (refer to Recommendation 2 on page 1287 and Recommendation 4 on page 1290). See above question and response. The number one research issue to arise out of LAST is to determine the natural history of CIN 1 adjudicated by p16 (refer to page 1291). References of the paper do suggest that CIN 1 that is p16+ may be more likely to progress, but the data was not felt to be conclusive. That is why we recommend only doing it on cases that are at the the interface and not all CIN This is Recommendation 4a (refer to page )The issue is that after the p16 highlights the area of a potentially missed lesion on H&E, the area in question either through the stain or on the associated H&E must also look like a potential HSIL+. 2. It does NOT! Such is one of the biologic rationales for the more unified HSIL terminology. p16 positivity cannot segregate the grade of HSIL. p16 cannot segregate CIN 2 from CIN 3. So it won t help you resolve the grade of an HSIL if both of you think it is indeed an HSIL.
5 In cases of professional disagreement between CIN 2 and CIN 3 morphology on biopsy, and the p16 stain is positive, how does one know if the case represents one of the 77% positive CIN 2's vs one of the 99% positive CIN 3's? How would you interpret an endocervical curettage with scattered weakly to moderately p16+ cells cluster (<5 cells)? Do you do p16 on eccs? One does NOT! Such is one of the biologic rationales for the more unified HSIL terminology. p16 positivity cannot segregate the grade of HSIL. This is part of the WG4 recommendation 4a scenario (refer to page 1290) The cells in question have to morphologically be consistent with a possible HSIL or AIS. Beware of isolated endometrial cells. I do not do them routinely. Multiple studies have shown the sensitivity of ECC is very low. Is there a role for HPV high and low risk ISH in evaluating mimic lesions? R4a: SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCE p16 IHC is recommended as an adjunct to morphologic assessment for biopsy specimens interpreted as < IN 1 that are at high risk for missed high-grade disease, which is defined as a prior cytologic interpretation of HSIL, ASC-H, ASC-US/HPV16 +, or AGC (NOS). Any identified p16 positive area must meet H&E morphologic criteria for a high grade lesion to be reinterpreted as such. ISH is not as robust as p16 mainly due to false negatives as discussed. Positives are useful; negatives not so much and HPV ISH won t distinguish LSIL from HSIL at all. (Refer to WG4 discussion beginning on page 1285)
6 Would you please comment on the utility of 3q26 in disease Another promising marker that may be more specific but less progression sensitive for -IN3. There are no clinical trials and very limited literature so it is not considered ready for prime time. Does differentiated p53 associated AIN exist? Yes, albeit relatively rarely, ~10 % We have had repeated requests for HR HPV testing in "alternate" sites - penis, perianal - since as you demonstrated that these are identical processes, should there be an hesitation to cross over these site samples to what we are doing for cervical samples or do we need to wait for specific FDA approval for the site? Can you comment on the use of markers for HPV associated oral cancer? Could you comment on the use of TERC and limitations? Please talk a little bit about proexc. What about the role E6/E7 testing has? What is your opinion on the role of HPV IHC? Unlikely there will ever be FDA approvals for these other sites. As discussed, positives are useful; negatives are confounded by sampling problems. Only do if it is really going to impact clinical management. LAST did not specifically address head and neck lesions but based on the axiomatic principles and biology they should work like in the genital tract, more analogous to vulva than cervix in that a large fraction of H&N cancer is not HPV associated. There is insufficient data and no clinical trials so not a prime time marker. It may be more specific but less sensitive for CIN 3+. (Refer to WG4 discussion beginning on page 1285) ProExC behaves a lot like p16, but there is a lot less literature to make it our first choice. (Refer to WG4 discussion beginning on page 1285 and page 1291) In the context of screening Aptima E67 RNA is FDA approved. However, in the context of LAST and application to tissue, not any real data as of now to support prime time use. (Refer to WG4 discussion beginning on page 1285) Which HPV IHC? L1? Other claimed target? No clinical trials and very little literature to support prime time use. (Refer to WG4 discussion beginning on page 1285)
7 Please share your views on calling a focal CIN 1 on biopsy when the cytology is ASCUS. Do you use this diagnosis? What does the abbreviation "NILM" stand for? Some labs provide and confuse physicians to use Spirabrush instead of punch biopsy. They claim that it is better than a punch biopsy and cause less bleeding and discomfort to the patient. a.) Can you comment on False Negatives? b.) If Labs provide, does this become out of compliance (inducement)? c.) Is this a standard of practice? Sorry that my question is off topic...what is the role of HPV genotyping in medicolegal cases (ex. Anogenital lesions in a infant or child)? Should the pathologist routinely request testing in these instances or leave that decision to the surgeon, referring physician or pediatrician? It has been my experience that physicians are reluctant to have their name attached to such an order due to the potential social ramifications. Thank you Dr. Stoler! CIN 1 is massively overcalled in the community so much so that up to 70% of CIN 1 biopsies so-called have no HPV in them! Therefore I would only call CIN 1 if I see very good and specific criteria on the H&E. Negative for Intraepithelial Lesion or Malignancy (Reference: Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: Terminology for Reporting Results of Cervical Cytology. JAMA. 2002;287(16): doi: /jama ) a) Spirabrushes are being promoted as you say but are not widely used and like everything else have pros and cons. Theoretically it samples more surface area. False negatives can still occur due to fragmentation, orientation of canal based lesions and how thoroughly the device is used. b) It depends what strings are attached, i.e. do you try and coerce them with the offer. We do not provide biopsy implements. c) Spirabrushes usage is very regional; my perception right now is that this is mainly a west coast thing. ASCCP is not promoting this over colpo/biopsy(s). I am unaware of a good systematic study head to head. I really, really discourage the use of HPV testing for child sexual abuse. There are too many examples of non abuse transmission that would confound any such analysis as a legal standard. Bottom line, in my opinion one cannot prove abuse or medicolegal cases with HPV. You all are welcome for the excellent questions.
chapter 4. The effect of oncogenic HPV on transformation zone epithelium
chapter 4. The effect of oncogenic HPV on transformation zone epithelium CHAPTER 1 All squamous cervical cancer (and probably all cervical adenocarcinoma) is associated with oncogenic HPV, and the absence
More informationNew Diagnoses Need New Approaches: A Glimpse into the Near Future of Gynecologic Pathology
New Diagnoses Need New Approaches: A Glimpse into the Near Future of Gynecologic Pathology United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology 102 nd Annual Meeting Baltimore, Maryland Christina S. Kong, M.D.
More information!"#$%&'(#)*$+&,$-&.#,$/#0()1-$ ),1')$2(%&,2#,%$%(0'#$34567$
!"#$%&'(#)*$+&,$-&.#,$/#0()1-$ ),1')$2(%&,2#,%$%(0'#$34567$ Updated Consensus Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors American Society for and Cervical Pathology
More informationThe LAST Guidelines in Clinical Practice. Implementing Recommendations for p16 Use
AJCP / Original Article The LAST Guidelines in Clinical Practice Implementing Recommendations for p16 Use Lani K. Clinton, MD, PhD, 1,2 Kyle Miyazaki, 1 Asia Ayabe, 1 James Davis, PhD, 2 Pamela Tauchi-Nishi,
More informationThe society for lower genital tract disorders since 1964.
The society for lower genital tract disorders since 1964. Updated Consensus Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors American Society for and Cervical Pathology
More informationAppropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines
Appropriate Use of Cytology and HPV Testing in the New Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Tim Kremer, MD Ralph Anderson, MD 1 Objectives Describe the natural history of HPV particularly as it relates
More informationTHE WEBINAR WILL BEGIN MOMENTARILY. ENJOY!
Welcome to CAP s Hot Topics in Pathology Webinar Series sponsored by the Personalized Health Care Committee This webinar on Biomarkers in HPV-associated Lower Anogenital Squamous Lesions from the CAP-ASCCP
More informationFaculty Pap Smear Guidelines: Family Planning Update 2008 Part Two
Faculty Pap Smear Guidelines: Family Planning Update 2008 Part Two Seshu P. Sarma, MD, FAAP Emory University Regional Training Center Atlanta, Georgia Produced by the Alabama Department of Public Health
More informationASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests
ASCCP 2013 Guidelines for Managing Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests www.treatmentok.com Barbara S. Apgar, MD, MS Professor of Family Medicine University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan Disclosures
More informationHPV Testing & Cervical Cancer Screening:
HPV Testing & Cervical Cancer Screening: Are they linked? By William Chapman, MD, FRCPC Screening for precursor lesions of cervical cancer by the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear has been one of the greatest success
More informationHuman Papillomavirus
Human Papillomavirus Dawn Palaszewski, MD Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of February 18, 2018 9:40 am Dawn Palaszewski, MD Assistant Professor Department of Obstetrics and
More informationGYN (Glandulars) Still Difficult After All These Years! Dina R Mody, MD Director of Cytology Laboratories and fellowship Program Methodist Hospital
GYN (Glandulars) Still Difficult After All These Years! Dina R Mody, MD Director of Cytology Laboratories and fellowship Program Methodist Hospital and Bioreference Labs (Houston) Department of Pathology
More informationHPV and Lower Genital Tract Disease. Simon Herrington University of Edinburgh, UK Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK
HPV and Lower Genital Tract Disease Simon Herrington University of Edinburgh, UK Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, UK Conflict of interest/funding X None Company: Product royalties Paid consultant Research
More informationCervical Cancer Screening for the Primary Care Physician for Average Risk Individuals Clinical Practice Guidelines. June 2013
Cervical Cancer Screening for the Primary Care Physician for Average Risk Individuals Clinical Practice Guidelines General Principles: Since its introduction in 1943, Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is widely
More informationCervical Cancer 4/27/2016
Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Management of Abnormal Results Kathy A. King, MD Assistant Professor of OB/GYN Medical College of Wisconsin May 6, 2016 Cervical Cancer In US about
More informationColposcopy. Attila L Major, MD, PhD
Colposcopy Attila L Major, MD, PhD Histology Colposcopy Cytology It has been estimated that annual Pap smear testing reduces a woman s chance of dying of cervical cancer from 4 in 1000 to about 5 in 10,000
More informationCervical Dysplasia and HPV
Cervical Dysplasia and HPV J. Anthony Rakowski D.O., F.A.C.O.O.G. MSU SCS Board Review Coarse HPV Double stranded DNA virus The HPV infect epithelial cells of the skin and mucous membranes Highest risk
More informationWhen Immunostains Can Get You in Trouble: Gynecologic Pathology p16: Panacea or Pandora s Box?
When Immunostains Can Get You in Trouble: Gynecologic Pathology p16: Panacea or Pandora s Box? Teri A. Longacre, MD Stanford Medicine Stanford California pi6 in Gynecologic Pathology: Panacea or Pandora
More informationBC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results. February 2018
BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results 2 Table of Contents BC Cancer Cervix Screening 2015 Program Results... 1 Table of Contents... 2 Program Overview...
More informationP16 et Ki67 Biomarkers: new tool for risk management and low grade intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL): be ready for the future.
P16 et Ki67 Biomarkers: new tool for risk management and low grade intraepithelial lesions (LGSIL): be ready for the future. Mark H Stoler, MD University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA,
More informationUnderstanding Your Pap Test Results
Understanding Your Pap Test Results Most laboratories in the United States use a standard set of terms called the Bethesda System to report pap test results. Normal: Pap samples that have no cell abnormalities
More informationObjectives. I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today. Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines: Updates and Controversies
Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines: Updates and Controversies I have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today. Jody Steinauer, MD, MAS University of California, San Francisco Objectives
More informationMaking Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening
Making Sense of Cervical Cancer Screening New Guidelines published November 2012 Tammie Koehler DO, FACOG The incidence of cervical cancer in the US has decreased more than 50% in the past 30 years because
More informationYour Colposcopy Visit
Introduction Welcome to the colposcopy clinic. This booklet tells you about. The colposcopy examination.. Tests that are done in the colposcopy clinic.. What these tests look for Take a few minutes to
More informationProf. Silvio Tatti MD, MSc, Phd, FACOG Past President IFCPC Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín University of Buenos Aires
Prof. Silvio Tatti MD, MSc, Phd, FACOG Past President IFCPC Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín University of Buenos Aires Introduction and Update of the new IFCPC nomenclature Professor Silvio Tatti
More informationTable of Contents. 1. Overview. 2. Interpretation Guide. 3. Staining Gallery Cases Negative for CINtec PLUS
Staining Atlas Table of Contents 1. Overview 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Role of p16 INK4a 1.3 Role of Ki-67 1.4 Molecular Pathogenesis 1.5 p16 INK4a Expression in Cervical Dysplasia 1.6 The Concept of CINtec
More informationUpdated ASCCP Consensus Guidelines For Managing Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Precursors Michael A. Gold, M.D.
Updated ASCCP Consensus Guidelines For Managing Diagnosed Cervical Cancer Precursors Michael A. Gold, M.D. 27 May, 2014 London, England Faculty Disclosure X No, nothing to disclose Yes, please specify
More informationSESSION J4. What's Next? Managing Abnormal PAPs in 2014
37th Annual Advanced Practice in Primary and Acute Care Conference: October 9-11, 2014 2:45 SESSION J4 What's Next? Managing Abnormal PAPs in 2014 Session Description: Linda Eckert, MD Review current guidelines
More informationCervical Testing and Results Management. An Evidenced-Based Approach April 22nd, Debora Bear, MSN, MPH
Cervical Testing and Results Management An Evidenced-Based Approach April 22nd, 2010 Debora Bear, MSN, MPH Assistant Medical Director for Planned Parenthood of New Mexico, Inc. Burden of cervical cancer
More informationChapter 10: Pap Test Results
Chapter 10: Pap Test Results On completion of this section, the learner will be able to: 1. Identify how Pap test results are interpreted and the reasons for normal and abnormal results. 2. Describe the
More informationCase Based Problems. Recommended Guidelines. Workshop: Case Management of Abnormal Pap Smears and Colposcopies. Disclosure
Disclosure Workshop: Case Management of Abnormal Pap Smears and Colposcopies Rebecca Jackson, MD Associate Professor Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences and Epidemiology & Biostatistics This
More informationManagement of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology
Management of Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Histology Assoc. Prof. Gökhan Tulunay Etlik Zübeyde Hanım Women s Diseases Teaching & Research Hospital Gynecologic Oncology Clinic Universally accepted guideline
More informationMolecular Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Lesions of Uterine Cervix: The 95% solution. Mark H. Stoler, MD PSC Symposium USCAP 2008
Molecular Analysis in the Diagnosis and Management of Lesions of Uterine Cervix: The 95% solution Mark H. Stoler, MD PSC Symposium USCAP 2008 Objectives: This presentation will briefly review the currently
More informationEU guidelines for reporting gynaecological cytology
EU guidelines for reporting gynaecological cytology Amanda Herbert Guy s & St Thomas Foundation NHS Trust 5th EFCS Annual Tutorial, Trondheim, Norway 28 th May 1 st June 2012 EU guidelines aim to harmonize
More informationNo Disclosures. Updated Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Management of Abnormal Results. Objectives 5/9/2016
Updated Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Prevention Management of Abnormal Results Kathy A. King, MD Assistant Professor of OB/GYN Medical Director, PPWI Medical College of Wisconsin May 6,
More informationPap Smears Pelvic Examinations Well Woman Examinations. When should you have them performed???
Pap Smears Pelvic Examinations Well Woman Examinations. When should you have them performed??? Arlene Evans-DeBeverly, PA-C Copyright 2012 There are always ongoing changes in gynecology, including the
More informationClinical Practice Guidelines June 2013
Clinical Practice Guidelines June 2013 General Principles: The Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is widely credited with reducing mortality from cervical cancer, and remains the single best method for the early
More informationOver-diagnoses in Cytopathology: Is histology the gold standard?
Over-diagnoses in Cytopathology: Is histology the gold standard? Teresa M. Darragh, MD UCSF Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences Faculty Disclosures: Teresa M. Darragh,
More informationCervical Cancer Screening Update. Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health
Cervical Cancer Screening Update Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health Previous Cervical Cancer Screening Organization Recommendation ACS (2011) ACP (2008) NCI (2003) Age 21 or 3 years after first intercourse
More informationDysplasia: layer of the cervical CIN. Intraepithelial Neoplasia. p16 immunostaining. 1, Cervical. Higher-risk, requires CIN.
CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE Guideline Number: DHMP_DHMC_PG1015 Guideline Subject: Routine Cervical Cancer Screening Effective Date: 9/2018 Revision Date: 9/2019 Pages: 2 of 2 Quality Management Committee
More informationCervical Screening for Dysplasia and Cancer in Patients with HIV
Cervical Screening for Dysplasia and Cancer in Patients with HIV Adult Clinical Guideline from the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute w w w.hivg uidelines.org Purpose of the Guideline Increase
More informationManagement Algorithms for Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Colposcopy
Management Algorithms for Abnormal Cervical Cytology and Colposcopy Table of Contents Standard Colposcopic Definitions... 1 Guidelines for the Assessment of Abnormal Cervical Cytology... 2 Ia: Persistent
More informationHPV Genotyping: A New Dimension in Cervical Cancer Screening Tests
HPV Genotyping: A New Dimension in Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Lee P. Shulman MD The Anna Ross Lapham Professor in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Chief, Division of Clinical Genetics Feinberg School
More informationEradicating Mortality from Cervical Cancer
Eradicating Mortality from Cervical Cancer Michelle Berlin, MD, MPH Vice Chair, Obstetrics & Gynecology Associate Director, Center for Women s Health June 2, 2009 Overview Prevention Human Papilloma Virus
More informationQuantitative Optical Spectroscopy of the Uterine Cervix: A cost effective way to detect and manage cervical disease
Quantitative Optical Spectroscopy of the Uterine Cervix: A cost effective way to detect and manage cervical disease Nahida Chakhtoura, MD, Leo Twiggs, MD, Timothy DeSantis, MD Claudia Werner, MD, William
More informationObjectives. Atypical Glandular Cells. Atypical Endocervical Cells. Reactive Endocervical Cells
2013 California Society of Pathologists 66 th Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA Atypical Glandular Cells to Early Invasive Adenocarcinoma: Cervical Cytology and Histology Christina S. Kong, MD Associate
More informationWorkshop for O& G trainees and paramedics 17 Dec 2011 Cytological Interpretation
Workshop for O& G trainees and paramedics 17 Dec 2011 Cytological Interpretation May Yu Director of Cytology Laboratory Service Department of Anatomical & Cellular Pathology Prince of Wales Hospital Cervical
More informationCINtec PLUS and the Pap smear: a co-testing alternative
CINtec PLUS and the Pap smear: a co-testing alternative Rosemary Tambouret MD p16/ki67 (CINtec PLUS) and the Pap smear Rosemary Tambouret MD CINtec PLUS dual stain: p16 and Ki67 p16 is anti-proliferative
More informationClinical Guidance: Recommended Best Practices for Delivery of Colposcopy Services in Ontario Best Practice Pathway Summary
Clinical Guidance: Recommended Best Practices for Delivery of Colposcopy Services in Ontario Best Practice Pathway Summary Glossary of Terms Colposcopy is the examination of the cervix, vagina and, in
More informationCytology Report Format
Squamous Precursor Lesions and Malignancies In Pap Test Dina R. Mody, MD, FCAP Director of Cytology The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Weill Medical College
More informationMultimodal Spectroscopic Imaging of the Cervix for Triaging Patients to Colposcopy
Multimodal Spectroscopic Imaging of the Cervix for Triaging Patients to Colposcopy L Twiggs, T De Santis, NM Chaktoura, D Ferris, L Flowers, M Lashgari, E Wilkinson, S Bambot, A Agrawal, and D Mongin EUROGIN
More informationSQUAMOUS CELLS: Atypical squamous cells (ASC) - of undetermined significance (ASC-US) - cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H)
SQUAMOUS CELLS: Atypical squamous cells (ASC) - of undetermined significance (ASC-US) - cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) ASC refers to cytologic changes suggestive of SIL, which are qualitativley or quantitatively
More informationDetect Cervical Cancer ReachMD Page 1 of 7
Transcript Details This is a transcript of a continuing medical education (CME) activity accessible on the ReachMD network. Additional media formats for the activity and full activity details (including
More informationLessons From Cases of Screened Women Who Developed Cervical Carcinoma
Lessons From Cases of Screened Women Who Developed Cervical Carcinoma R. Marshall Austin MD,PhD Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center raustin@magee.edu Why Focus Study On Cases
More informationEuropean Union survey on organization and quality control of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination programs
European Union survey on organization and quality control of cervical cancer screening and HPV vaccination programs Introduction to the Survey The purpose of this project is to collect information regarding
More informationHuman Papillomaviruses and Cancer: Questions and Answers. Key Points. 1. What are human papillomaviruses, and how are they transmitted?
CANCER FACTS N a t i o n a l C a n c e r I n s t i t u t e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e s o f H e a l t h D e p a r t m e n t o f H e a l t h a n d H u m a n S e r v i c e s Human Papillomaviruses
More information76 Arch Pathol Lab Med Vol 138, January 2014 p16 Utilization in Cervical Biopsies Singh et al
Variability of Pathologists Utilization of p16 and Ki-67 Immunostaining in the Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies in Routine Pathology Practice and Its Impact on the Frequencies of Cervical Intraepithelial
More informationCervical Cancer : Pap smear
Taking a PAP SMEAR Cervical Cancer : Pap smear George N Papanicolaou introduced cervical cytology in clinical practice in 1940 In 1945, PAP smear was endorsed by American cancer society as an effective
More informationCervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Update
Frontier AIDS Education and Training Center Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Update Hillary Liss, MD Harborview Medical Center, Madison and Adult Medicine Clinics Frontier AETC, Medical Program Director
More informationCervical FISH Testing for Triage and Support of Challenging Diagnoses: A Case Study of 2 Patients
Cervical FISH Testing for Triage and Support of Challenging Diagnoses: A Case Study of 2 Patients Richard Hopley, MD, Alexandra Gillespie, MD* Laboratory Medicine 47:1:52-56 CLINICAL HISTORY Patients:
More informationPreface to the Second Edition
Preface to the Second Edition This second edition of Diagnosis of Endometrial Biopsies and Curettings: A Practical Approach follows a number of favorable comments we received about the first edition. As
More informationCytology/Biopsy/Leep Gynecologic Correlation: Practical Considerations and Approaches.
Cytology/Biopsy/Leep Gynecologic Correlation: Practical Considerations and Approaches. Fadi W. Abdul-Karim MD MEd. Professor of Pathology. Vice chair for education. Robert Tomsich Pathology and Lab Med
More informationI have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.
Cervical Cancer Screening Update and Implications for Annual Exams George F. Sawaya, MD Professor Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
More informationNews. Laboratory NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING TIMOTHY UPHOFF, PHD, DABMG, MLS (ASCP) CM
Laboratory News Inside This Issue NEW GUIDELINES DEMONSTRATE GREATER ROLE FOR HPV TESTING IN CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING...1 NEW HPV TEST METHODOLOGY PROVIDES BETTER SPECIFICITY FOR CERVICAL CANCER...4 BEYOND
More information4. Monitoring of PAP test with Cervical Biopsy Correlations
Page 1 of 6 1. For cases of an HSIL Pap test with a discordant biopsy report where only the biopsy report is available, what action do you take? (check all that apply) Paper correlation without review
More informationSamuel B. Wolf, D.O., F.A.C.O.G. Emerald Coast Obstetrics and Gynecology Panama City Florida
Making sense of the new Pap smear screening guidelines. Samuel B. Wolf, D.O., F.A.C.O.G. Emerald Coast Obstetrics and Gynecology Panama City Florida Case 17 year old G1P0010 with first sexual encounter
More informationHPV and Cervical Cancer, Screening and Prevention. John Ragsdale, MD July 12, 2018 CME Lecture Series
HPV and Cervical Cancer, Screening and Prevention John Ragsdale, MD July 12, 2018 CME Lecture Series We have come a long Way Prevalence HPV in Young Adults in U.S HPV genotypes 55-60% of All cancers 20%
More informationThe Bethesda System: Updates for th Cytopathology Congress Bursa, Turkey October 14, 2015
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL The Bethesda System: Updates for 2015 6th Cytopathology Congress Bursa, Turkey October 14, 2015 David C. Wilbur, M.D. Dept. of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital DISCLOSURES
More informationHPV TESTING AND UNDERSTANDING VALIDITY: A tough row to hoe. Mark H. Stoler, MD ASC Companion Meeting USCAP 2008
OBJECTIVES: HPV TESTING AND UNDERSTANDING VALIDITY: A tough row to hoe Mark H. Stoler, MD ASC Companion Meeting USCAP 2008 1. Describe the concept of marker validation in the context of HPV tests. 2. Present
More informationComparing Liquid-Based Cytology Methods in the Detection of Cervical Cancer: Perspectives from Dr. Ming Guo
Transcript Details This is a transcript of an educational program accessible on the ReachMD network. Details about the program and additional media formats for the program are accessible by visiting: https://reachmd.com/programs/advances-in-womens-health/comparing-liquid-based-cytology-methodsdetection-cervical-cancer-perspectives-dr-ming-guo/7469/
More informationI have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.
Cervical Cancer Prevention: 2012 and Beyond George F. Sawaya, MD Professor Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California,
More informationInterpretation guide. Abnormal cytology can t hide anymore
Interpretation guide Abnormal cytology can t hide anymore Unique dual-biomarker technology makes you certain about the presence of transforming HPV infection. The science that creates certainty. Table
More informationCervical cancer prevention: Advances in primary screening and triage system
Cervical cancer prevention: Advances in primary screening and triage system Dr Farid Hadi Regional Medical and Scientific Affairs Roche Diagnostics Asia-Pacific, Singapore Cervical cancer is highly preventable
More informationCASE 4 21/07/2017. Ectopic Prostatic Tissue in Cervix. Female 31. LLETZ for borderline nuclear abnormalities
Female 31 CASE 4 LLETZ for borderline nuclear abnormalities PSA Ectopic Prostatic Tissue in Cervix AJSP 2006;30;209-215 usually incidental microscopic finding usually in ectocervical stroma? developmental
More informationShould Anal Pap Smears Be a Standard of Care in HIV Management?
Should Anal Pap Smears Be a Standard of Care in HIV Management? Gordon Dickinson, M.D., FACP Professor of Medicine and Chief Infectious Diseases, Miller School of Medicine Short Answer: NO But 15-20 HPV
More informationI have no financial interests in any product I will discuss today.
Cervical Cancer Screening Update and Implications for Annual Exams George F. Sawaya, MD Professor Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
More informationWelcome. THE ROLE OF oncofish cervical ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL DYSPLASIA. March 26, 2013
THE ROLE OF oncofish cervical IN THE ASSESSMENT OF CERVICAL DYSPLASIA The phone lines will open, 15 minutes prior to the start of the webinar. Toll Free: 1-800-867-0864. Entry Code: 83956484. You may download
More informationScreening for Cervical Cancer: Demystifying the Guidelines DR. NEERJA SHARMA
Screening for Cervical Cancer: Demystifying the Guidelines DR. NEERJA SHARMA Cancer Care Ontario Cervical Cancer Screening Goals Increase patient participation in cervical screening Increase primary care
More informationPushing the Boundaries of the Lab Diagnosis in Asia
Pushing the Boundaries of the Lab Diagnosis in Asia Diana Lim MBBS, FRCPA, FRCPath (UK) Senior Consultant National University Health System and National University of Singapore Department of Pathology
More informationCan HPV-16 Genotyping Provide a Benchmark for Cervical Biopsy Specimen Interpretation?
Anatomic Pathology / Monitoring HPV-16 Fractions in CIN Can HPV-16 Genotyping Provide a Benchmark for Cervical Biopsy Specimen Interpretation? Mary T. Galgano, MD, 1 Philip E. Castle, PhD, MPH, 2 Mark
More informationAbnormal Spectroscopy Scans May Presage Persistent or Progressive Cervical Dysplasia
Abnormal Spectroscopy Scans May Presage Persistent or Progressive Cervical Dysplasia Leo B. Twiggs, M.D. Professor Emeritus University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami Florida USA Currently- Women
More informationDisclosures Teresa M Darragh, MD
Below the Belt: Screening for HPV-associated Cancers Teresa M. Darragh, MD UCSF Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences Disclosures Teresa M Darragh, MD Hologic: Research
More informationCINtec PLUS Cytology. Interpretation training
CINtec PLUS Cytology Interpretation training Objectives After reviewing this learning module, you will have a basic understanding of how to interpret CINtec PLUS Cytology, including: The mechanism of action
More informationPAP SMEAR by Dr.Shantha Krishnamurthy MD Senior Consultant Pathology Fortis Hospitals
PAP SMEAR by Dr.Shantha Krishnamurthy MD Senior Consultant Pathology Fortis Hospitals Historical Named after George Papanicolaou, a Greek American Studied cervical epithelium in menstrual cycle of guinea
More informationCervical Cancer Screening
Todd R. Jenkins, MD, MSHA Senior Vice Chair Director, Division of Women s Reproductive Healthcare Learning Objectives Describe the etiology, natural history, and usage of the human papillomavirus (HPV)
More informationWELL WOMAN CLINIC-SCREENING PROGRAM FOR CERVICAL CARCINOMAS G. J. Vani Padmaja 1
WELL WOMAN CLINIC-SCREENING PROGRAM FOR CERVICAL CARCINOMAS G. J. Vani Padmaja 1 HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: G. J. Vani Padmaja. Well Woman Clinic-Screening Program for Cervical Carcinomas. Journal of Evolution
More informationHistopathology: Cervical HPV and neoplasia
Histopathology: Cervical HPV and neoplasia These presentations are to help you identify basic histopathological features. They do not contain the additional factual information that you need to learn about
More informationClinical Policy Title: Fluorescence in situ hybridization for cervical cancer screening
Clinical Policy Title: Fluorescence in situ hybridization for cervical cancer screening Clinical Policy Number: 01.01.02 Effective Date: April 1, 2015 Initial Review Date: January 21, 2015 Most Recent
More information1. Q: What has changed from the draft recommendations posted for public comment in November/December 2011?
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) in regard to Molecular Testing Guideline for Selection of Lung Cancer Patients for EGFR and ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors 1. Q: What has changed from the draft recommendations
More informationPRE TEST CERVICAL SCREENING MANAGEMENT COLPOSCOPY PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
PRE TEST CERVICAL SCREENING MANAGEMENT COLPOSCOPY PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT QUESTION #1 WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT A RISK FACTOR FOR CERVICAL CANCER? A. HIGH RISK HPV B. CIGARETTE SMOKING C.
More informationClinical Relevance of HPV Genotyping. A New Dimension In Human Papillomavirus Testing. w w w. a u t o g e n o m i c s. c o m
Clinical Relevance of HPV Genotyping A New Dimension In Human Papillomavirus Testing Human Papillomavirus: Incidence HPV prevalence was 26.8% for women in US aged 14 59 yrs 1 20 million Americans are currently
More informationStreamlining Protocols-From Strategy to Implementation. Doreen Ramogola-Masire Botswana UPenn Partnership June 2014
Streamlining Protocols-From Strategy to Implementation Doreen Ramogola-Masire Botswana UPenn Partnership 18-20 June 2014 Botswana-UPenn Partnership Partnership between Government of Botswana, University
More informationCASEFINDING. KCR Abstractor s Training
CASEFINDING KCR Abstractor s Training 1 Introduction Casefinding Definition Purpose Methods Sources vs Resources Reportable Cancer Conditions Non-Reportable Conditions Ambiguous Terminology 2 https://www.google.com/search?q=puzzle+pieces&client=firefox-a&hs=mdc&rls=org.mozilla
More informationThe Rapidly Changing Landscape of Cervical Screening, Management and Terminology
The Rapidly Changing Landscape of Cervical Screening, Management and Terminology Mohi Ghofrani, MD, MBA PeaceHealth Laboratories Vancouver mghofran@swmedicalcenter.org 2012 Was a Big Year for Cervical
More informationCervical Cancer Prevention in the 21 st Century Changing Paradigms
Cervical Cancer Prevention in the 21 st Century Changing Paradigms Teresa M. Darragh, MD UCSF Departments of Pathology and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences Faculty Disclosures: Teresa M.
More informationColposcopy Standards Working Group 2: Risk-based colposcopy
Colposcopy Standards Working Group 2: Risk-based colposcopy Chairs: Nicolas Wentzensen and L. Stewart Massad Members: Mark Schiffman, Michelle Khan, Rebecca Perkins, Katie Smith, Julia Gage, Michael Gold,
More informationVideo Workshop Cervical cancer screening as a multidisciplinary process
Video Workshop Cervical cancer screening as a multidisciplinary process Dr. Amanda Herbert (Guy s & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London) Professor Jaroslava Duskova (Charles University, Prague, Czech
More informationHuman Papillomavirus Genotyping and Cervical Smear in Duhok/Iraq
Human Papillomavirus Genotyping and Cervical Smear in Duhok/Iraq Intisar Salim Pity (Professor pathology) MBChB, MSc, FIBMS Hanaa Mohammad Abdo (MSc microbiology) Amer A. Goreal (Microbiology) MBChB, FIBMS
More informationCervical Cancer Screening. David Quinlan December 2013
Cervical Cancer Screening David Quinlan December 2013 Cervix Cervical Cancer Screening Modest variation provincially WHO and UK begin at 25 stop at 60 Finland begin at 30 stop at 60 Rationale for
More informationHIV-infected men and women. Joel Palefsky, M.D. University of California, San Francisco
Anal cytology and anal cancer in HIV-infected men and women. Joel Palefsky, M.D. University of California, San Francisco April 10, 2010 Disclosures Merck and Co: Research grant support, advisory boards
More information