Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program
|
|
- Dora Martin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program Supplemental Guidance for the Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries, HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA)
2 Version 1.5 G. Alverson, G. Copeland, R. Humphrys, R. Kommareddi, L. Rappleye, T. McTaggart Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program Supplemental Guidance for the Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries, HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) August, 2015
3 Preface This supplement describes Michigan s testing and validation process, the transport mechanism to be used once the provider s CDAs have passed testing and validation, as well as, Michigan specific reportable condition data elements and the conformance optionalities to include in the cancer CDA in order to meet both the cancer reporting meaningful use objective and Michigan s mandated cancer reporting requirements.
4 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction Testing and Validation Cancer CDA Submission and Transport Data Elements and Conformance Optionalities Required to Meet Michigan Cancer Reporting Requirements... 4 List of Acronyms... 1 Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program i
5 List of Tables Table 3-1: Cancer CDA Routing and Tracking Requirements... 3 Table 4-1: Cancer Data Elements Cross Reference... 5 Table 4-2: RX Date CHEMO Flag Value Set... 7 Table 4-3: RX Date Hormone Flag Value Set... 8 Table 4-4: RX Date BRM Flag Value Set... 8 Table 4-5: Tumor, Nodes, and Metastases (TNM) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and s (LOINC) s... 9 Table 4-6: TNM Pathologic Tumor Value Set... 9 Table 4-7: TNM Pathologic Node Value Set Table 4-8: TNM Pathologic Metastasis Value Set Table 4-9: TNM Stage Descriptor Value Set Table 4-10: NAACCR TNM Pathologic Staged By Value Set Table 4-11: TNM Pathologic Stage Group Value Set Table 4-12: SEER SUMMARY STAGE 2000 Value Set List of Figures Figure 3-1: Routing Example... 4 Figure 4-1: TNM Pathological Stage Entry Example Diagnosis Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program ii
6 1.0 Introduction The Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP) is supporting eligible professionals (providers) meet the Stage 2 Meaningful Use cancer reporting objective: capability to identify and report cancer cases to a public health central registry. Michigan s cancer registry will be accepting cancer case information in accordance with the implementation guide referenced in the Office of the National Coordinator s for Health Information Technology (ONC) 2014 Standards and Certification Criteria final rule, Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries, Release 1, August The implementation guide was jointly developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR). The Implementation Guide contains specifications for the transmission of cancer case information from ONC certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT) to a public health central cancer registry. The guide defines the trigger event and business rules for CEHRT to identify reportable cancer cases, defines cancer case data elements and specifications for creating a valid Health Level 7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2 (HL7 CDA R2) cancer event report. Users of the guide must be familiar with the details of HL7 CDA R2. The guide is intended for use in ambulatory care setting implementations. The guide is not intended for hospital or pathology laboratories implementations. The Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries, Release 1, August 2012 does not include specific statutory reporting requirements for each state or the transport mechanism for submitting cancer case information to the public health authorities jurisdiction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Stage 2 Meaningful Use final rule permits public health authorities to dictate the transport mechanism in their jurisdictions. This supplemental guide describes Michigan s testing and validation process, the transport mechanism to be used once the provider s CDAs have passed testing and validation, as well as, Michigan specific reportable condition data elements and the conformance optionalities to include in the cancer CDA in order to meet both the cancer reporting meaningful use objective and Michigan s mandated cancer reporting requirements. Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 1
7 2.0 Testing and Validation To ensure the structure and content of the CDA meets the quality assurance requirements of the MCSP, all provider organizations must complete a testing and validation process before the cancer CDAs are approved for production into Michigan s cancer registry. CEHRT vendors may begin the testing validation process on behalf of providers. Vendors and provider organizations interested in beginning the testing and validation process should contact MCSP technical assistance: mcsp.help@altarum.org. Providers who have registered their intent to initiate ongoing submission within 60 days of their reporting period and who have demonstrated their organization s ability to begin testing and validation with MCSP, will meet the Stage 2 meaningful use measure as long as the provider responds to requests for action from MCSP. If the provider fails to respond to requests for action within 30 days on two separate occasions, the provider may not meet the meaningful use measure. Questions regarding registration of intent and the public health Stage 2 meaningful use measures can be directed to: DCHPublicHealthMU@michigan.gov. Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 2
8 3.0 Cancer CDA Submission and Transport The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS), Michigan s public health authority, requires public health reporting for meaningful use to be transported through the Michigan Health Information Network Shared Services (MiHIN). MiHIN is the state s designated entity to coordinate health information exchange. Providers must select a MiHIN qualified organization or sub-state health information exchange (HIE) to handle the transmission of the cancer CDA through the MiHIN and to the state cancer registry. CEHRT vendors must coordinate the transmission of the cancer CDA with the MiHIN qualified organization. Further information on MiHIN qualified organizations can be found at Table 3-1: Cancer CDA Routing and Tracking Requirements For routing and meaningful use registration and tracking purposes, the cancer CDA must contain the following information. CDA Data Element Organizational ID* (Organization of the Facility where event took place) Facility OID (Location where event took place) Information Recipient Receiving Public Health System Cancer CDA IG Optionality MI Cancer Transport Requirement CDA xpath Not present SHALL ClinicalDocument/custodian/assignedCustodian/repres entedcustodianorganization/id/@root *Instructions for obtaining organizational and facility OIDs can be found at: n_msss_26sept13.docx should not be equal to (NPI OID). Not present SHALL ClinicalDocument/componentOf/encompassingEncoun ter/location/healthcarefacility/id/@root should not be equal to (NPI OID). Not present SHALL ClinicalDocument/custodian/assignedCustodian/repres entedcustodianorganization/id[@root= '] MDHHS Not present SHALL ClinicalDocument/custodian/assignedCustodian/repres entedcustodianorganization/id[@root= ' '] MCSR Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 3
9 Figure 3-1: Routing Example <custodian> <assignedcustodian> <representedcustodianorganization> <id root=" " extension="321cx" /> <!-- Organization NPI --> <id root=" " /> <!-- Organization OID --> <id root=" " extension="mdhhs" /> <!-- Receiving Facility --> <id root=" " extension="mcsr" /> <!-- Receiving Application -->... </representedcustodianorganization> </assignedcustodian> </custodian> <componentof> <encompassingencounter> <id extension=" " root=" " /> <code codesystem="" codesystemname="" code="" displayname="" /> <effectivetime> <low value=" " /> <high value=" " /> </effectivetime> <location> <healthcarefacility> <id root=" " /> <!-- Facility OID --> <id root=" " extension="12345" /> <!-- Facility NPI --> </healthcarefacility> </location> </encompassingencounter> </componentof> 4.0 Data Elements and Conformance Optionalities Required to Meet Michigan Cancer Reporting Requirements In Michigan, Act 82 of 1984 requires the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to operate a cancer registry. Under this law and the associated administrative rules, cancer cases are reportable to MDHHS by physicians, dentists, clinics, hospitals and laboratories that diagnose or treat patients with reportable conditions. The existing Michigan cancer registry receives these reports and incorporates the information into a statewide registry. All in situ and malignant conditions are reportable, with the exception of basal and squamous cell skin cancers in nongenital skin. Benign tumors of the brain and central nervous system are also reportable. The table below lists the conformance optionalities needed for the data elements to meet the Michigan Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 4
10 reporting requirements. Further information on the provider mandated reporting requirements can be found at: Table 4-1: Cancer Data Elements Cross Reference NAACR Data Item # Element 630 Primary Payer at DX 1220 RX Date-- Chemo (YYYYMM DD) 1221 RX Date-- Chemo Flag National Cancer CDA Optionality MI Mandated Reporting Optionality Template ID CDA xpath SHOULD SHALL [Coverage Entry] SHOULD SHALL [Medications] Not present SHALL [Medications] ']]/entry/a ct[templateid[@root=' ']]/entryRel ationship/act/code/@* ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low Depending on the values of the below xpaths for Chemo, the flag will have value as shown in the Table. CDA will not have a separate tag for this item RX Date-- Hormone (YYYYMM DD) SHOULD SHALL [Medications] ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/code And ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 5
11 NAACR Data Item # Element 1231 RX Date-- Hormone Flag National Cancer CDA Optionality MI Mandated Reporting Optionality Template ID CDA xpath Not present SHALL [Medications] Depending on the values of the below xpaths for Hormone, the flag will have value as shown in the Table. CDA will not have a separate tag for this item RX Date-- BRM (YYYYMM DD) 1241 RX Date-- BRM Flag SHOULD SHALL [Medications] Not present SHALL [Medications] ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/code And ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low Depending on the values of the below xpaths for BRM, the flag will have value as shown in the Table. CDA will not have a separate tag for this item. 108 Date of Death 880 TNM Path T ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/code And ']]/entry/sub stanceadministration/effectiveti me[1]/low Not present SHALL ClinicalDocument/recordTarget/ patientrole/patient/sdtc:deceas edind and ClinicalDocument/recordTarget/ patientrole/patient/sdtc:deceas Not present SHALL [TNM Stage Observation] edtime ']]/entry/ac t/entryrelationship/observation/ entryrelationship/observation/e ntryrelationship/observation[co de[@code=' ']]/value/@* Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 6
12 NAACR Data Item # Element 890 TNM Path N 900 TNM Path M 910 TNM Path Stage Group 920 TNM Path Descriptor 759 SEER Summary Stage 2000 National Cancer CDA Optionality MI Mandated Reporting Optionality Template ID CDA xpath Not present SHALL [TNM Stage Observation] Not present SHALL [TNM Stage Observation] Not present SHALL [TNM Stage Observation] Not present SHALL [TNM Stage Observation] ']]/entry/ac t/entryrelationship/observation/ entryrelationship/observation/e ntryrelationship/observation[co de[@code=' ']]/value/@* ']]/entry/ac t/entryrelationship/observation/ entryrelationship/observation/e ntryrelationship/observation[co de[@code=' ']]/value/@* ']]/entry/ac t/entryrelationship/observation[ templateid[@root=' ']]/entryRela tionship/observation/value/@* ']]/entry/ac t/entryrelationship/observation[ templateid[@root=' ']]/entryRela tionship/observation/value/quali fier[name[@code=" "]]/value/@* Not present SHALL Will be derived from Clinical Stage Group, Primary Site, and Histology at the registry. Table 4-2: RX Date CHEMO Flag Value Set Value Set NAACCR RX Date CHEMO Flag TBD OID DYNAMIC System NAACCR RX Date CHEMO Flag TBD OID LOINC Flag for Date 1st chemo Cancer Flag explains why no appropriate value is in the field, RX Date Chemo [1220] 10 No information whatsoever can be inferred from this exceptional value (e.g., unknown if chemotherapy administered) 11 No proper value is applicable in this context (e.g., no chemotherapy administered; autopsy only case) Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 7
13 12 A proper value is applicable but not known. This event occurred, but the date is unknown (e.g., chemotherapy administered but date is unknown) 15 Information is not available at this time, but it is expected that it will be available later (e.g., chemotherapy is planned as part of the first course of therapy, but had not been started at the time of the most recent follow-up) Blank A valid date value is provided in item RX Date Chemo [1220], or the date was not expected to have been transmitted Table 4-3: RX Date Hormone Flag Value Set Value Set NAACCR RX Date Hormone Flag TBD OID DYNAMIC System NAACCR RX Date Hormone Flag TBD OID LOINC Flag for Date 1st hormone Cancer Flag explains why no appropriate value is in the field, RX Date Hormone [1230] 10 No information whatsoever can be inferred from this exceptional value (e.g., unknown if any hormone therapy administered) 11 No proper value is applicable in this context (e.g., no hormone therapy administered; autopsy only cases) 12 A proper value is applicable but not known. This event occurred, but the date is unknown (e.g., hormone therapy administered but date is unknown) 15 Information is not available at this time, but it is expected that it will be available later (e.g., hormone therapy is planned as part of the first course of therapy, but had not been started at the time of the most recent follow-up) Blank A valid date value is provided in item RX Date Hormone [1230], or the date was not expected to have been transmitted Table 4-4: RX Date BRM Flag Value Set Value Set NAACCR RX Date BRM Flag TBD OID DYNAMIC System NAACCR RX Date BRM Flag TBD OID LOINC Flag for Date 1st BRM Cancer Flag explains why no appropriate value is in the field, RX Date BRM [1240] 10 No information whatsoever can be inferred from this exceptional value (e.g, unknown if immunotherapy administered) 11 No proper value is applicable in this context (e.g., no immunotherapy administered; autopsy only case) 12 A proper value is applicable but not known. This event occurred, but the date is unknown (e.g., immunotherapy administered but date is unknown) Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 8
14 15 Information is not available at this time, but it is expected that it will be available later (e.g., immune therapy is planned as part of the first course of therapy, but had not been started at the time of the most recent follow-up) Blank A valid date value is provided in item RX Date BRM [1240], or the date was not expected to have been transmitted Table 4-5: Tumor, Nodes, and Metastases (TNM) Logical Observation Identifiers Names and s (LOINC) s LOINC Display Name TNM Pathology T TNM Pathology N TNM Pathology M TNM Path Descriptor Value Set TNM Pathologic Tumor Value Set TNM Pathologic Node Value Set TNM Pathologic Metastasis Value Set TNM Pathologic Descriptor Value Set A detailed site-specific code for the Pathologic tumor (T) as defined by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and recorded by the physician. A detailed site-specific code for the Pathologic nodes (N) as defined by AJCC and recorded by the physician. A detailed site-specific staging code for the Pathologic metastases (M) as defined by AJCC and recorded by the physician. Descriptor.pathology Cancer Narrative Table 4-6: TNM Pathologic Tumor Value Set The AJCC Staging Manual TNM system is propriety and its definitions cannot be included in documents or electronic vocabulary systems without permission. Value Set TNM Pathologic Tumor DYNAMIC AJCC Website Link System TNM Pathologic Tumor (TNM 7. Edition) LOINC Primary tumor.pathology Detailed site-specific codes for the pathologic tumor (T) as defined by AJCC and recorded by the physician X Site specific descriptions prevent listing of text equivalents Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 9
15 Table 4-7: TNM Pathologic Node Value Set The AJCC Staging Manual TNM system is propriety and its definitions cannot be included in documents or electronic vocabulary systems without permission. Value Set AJCC Website Link System LOINC X TNM Pathologic Node DYNAMIC TNM Pathologic Node (TNM 7. Edition) Regional lymph nodes.pathology Detailed site-specific codes for the Pathologic Node (N) as defined by AJCC and recorded by the physician Site specific descriptions prevent listing of text equivalents Table 4-8: TNM Pathologic Metastasis Value Set The AJCC Staging Manual TNM system is propriety and its definitions cannot be included in documents or electronic vocabulary systems without permission. Value Set TNM Pathologic Metastasis DYNAMIC AJCC Website Link System TNM Pathologic Metastasis (TNM 7. Edition) LOINC Distant metastases.pathology Detailed site-specific codes for the Pathologic Metastasis (M) as defined by AJCC and recorded by the physician. X Site specific descriptions prevent listing of text equivalents Table 4-9: TNM Stage Descriptor Value Set Value Set TNM Stage Descriptor DYNAMIC PHIN VADS Link System E B39829B TNM Pathology Stage Descriptor (TNM 7. Edition) LOINC Descript.Pathology Cancer Identify special cases that need separate data analysis 0 None 1 E (Extranodal, lymphomas only) Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 10
16 2 S (Spleen, lymphomas only) 3 M (Multiple primary tumors in a single site) 4 Y (Classification during or after initial multimodality therapy) pathologic staging only 5 E & S (Extranodal and spleen, lymphomas only) 6 M & Y (Multiple primary tumors and initial multimodality therapy) 9 Unknown; not stated in patient s record Table 4-10: NAACCR TNM Pathologic Staged By Value Set Value Set NAACCR TNM Pathologic Staged By PHIN VADS Link TBD System NAACCR TNM Pathologic Staged By LOINC Stager.pathology Cancer Identifies the person who recorded the pathologic AJCC staging elements and the stage group in the patient s medical record 0 Not Staged 1 Managing physician 2 Pathologist 3 Pathologist and managing physician 4 Cancer Committee chair, cancer liaison physician, or registry physician advisor 5 Cancer registrar 6 Cancer registrar and physician 7 Staging assigned at another facility 8 Case is not eligible for staging 9 Unknown; not stated in patient record Table 4-11: TNM Pathologic Stage Group Value Set The AJCC Staging Manual TNM system is propriety and its definitions cannot be included in documents or electronic vocabulary systems without permission. Value Set TNM Pathologic Stage Group AJCC Website Link System TNM Pathologic Stage Group (TNM 7. Edition) SNOMED CT Detailed site-specific code for the pathologic stage group as defined by AJCC and recorded by the ambulatory healthcare provider (physician). 0 Site specific descriptions prevent listing of text equivalents Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 11
17 Table 4-12: SEER SUMMARY STAGE 2000 Value Set Value Set NAACCR SEER SUMMARY STAGE 2000 TBD OID DYNAMIC PHIN VADS Link TBD System NAACCR SEER SUMMARY STAGE 2000 TBD OID LOINC TBD SEER SS2000 Identify special cases that need separate data analysis 0 In situ 1 Localized 2 Regional, direct extension only 3 Regional, regional lymph nodes only 4 Regional, direct extension and regional lymph nodes 5 Regional, NOS 7 Distant 8 Not applicable 9 Unstaged Figure 4-1: TNM Pathological Stage Entry Example Diagnosis <entryrelationship type="subj" inversionind="true"> <observation class="obs" mood="evn"> <templateid root=" "/> <code code=" " displayname="tnm classification of malignant tumor before any treatment" codesystem=" " codesystemname="snomedct"/> <!-- Narrative TNM Pathology Stage --> <text> Stage 0 TisN0M0 </text> <status code="completed"/> <value xsi:type="cd" code=" " codesystem=" " displayname ="Pathologic TNM Stage Grouping"> <!--TNM Pathology Stage Descriptor Observation --> <qualifier> <name code=" " displayname="descript.pathology Cancer" codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc"/> <value xsi:type="cd" code="0" codesystem=" " codesystemname="tnm Pathology Stage Descriptor" displayname="none"/> </qualifier> <!--AJCC TNM Edition Number--> <qualifier> <name code=" " displayname="tnm Edition Number" codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc"/> <value xsi:type="cd" code="7" codesystem=" " codesystemname="naaccr TNM Edition Number" displayname="7th Edition"/> </qualifier> </value> <participant type="pprf"> Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 12
18 <participantrole> <code code=" " codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc" displayname="stager.pathology Cancer"/> <playingentity nullflavor="na"> <code xsi:type="ce" code="1" codesystem="tbd OID" codesystemname="tnm Pathology Staged By" displayname="managing Physician"/> </playingentity> </participantrole> </participant> <entryrelationship type="comp"> <!-- TNM Pathological Tumor Observation--> <observation class="obs" mood="evn"> <templateid root=" "/> <code code=" " displayname="tnm Pathological T" codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc"/> <status code="completed"/> <value code="t2" codesystem=" " displayname="tumor > 20 mm but <= to 50 mm in greatest dimension"/> </observation> </entryrelationship> <!--TNM Pathological Nodes Observation --> <entryrelationship type="comp"> <observation class="obs" mood="evn"> <templateid root=" "/> <code code=" " displayname="tnm Pathological N" codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc"/> <status code="completed"/> <value code="n1" codesystem=" " displayname="micrometastases; or metastases in 1 to 3 axillary lymph nodes; and/or in internal mammary nodes with metastases detected by sentinel lymph node biopsy but not clinically detected."/> </observation> </entryrelationship> <!-- TNM Pathological Metastases Observation--> <entryrelationship type="comp"> <observation class="obs" mood="evn"> <templateid root=" "/> <code code=" " displayname="tnm Pathological M" codesystem=" " codesystemname="loinc"/> <status code="completed"/> <value nullflavor="na"/> </observation> </entryrelationship> </observation> </entryrelationship> For questions regarding the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program and physician reporting requirements please contact: Jetty Alverson, CTR Quality Improvement Field Representative Ph: Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 13
19 Document Revision History Date Version Initial version published Added xpath details to the Michigan data elements, value sets and CDA example Updated Cancer CDA Submission and Transport section Updated Cancer CDA Submission and Transport section. 2. Added T, N, M value sets and updated the example Updated Cancer CDA Submission and Transport Section Updated to replace MDHHS logo with MDHHS logo. for Receiving Facility and Receiving Application in Table 3-1. Added Routing example code in Figure 3-1. Updated xpath for Date of Death and SEER Summary 2000 in Table 4-1. Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 14
20 List of Acronyms Acronym AJCC CEHRT CDC CDA CMS HL7 LOINC MCSP MDHHS MiHIN MSSS NAACCR PHIN OID ONC R2 TBD TNM VADS Acronym Definition American Joint Committee on Cancer Certified Electronic Health Record Technology Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Clinical Document Architecture Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Health Level Seven Logical Observation Identifiers Names and s Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Michigan Health Information Network Shared Services Michigan Syndromic Surveillance Syndrome North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Public Health Information Network Object Identifier Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Release Two To Be Determined Tumor, Nodes, and Metastases Vocabulary Access and Distribution System Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program 1
Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program
March, 2016 Version 1.7 Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program Supplemental Guidance for the Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries, HL7 Clinical Document
More information2018 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE: WHAT S NEW IN STAGING FOR 2018?
2018 IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE: WHAT S NEW IN STAGING FOR 2018? SESSION 2 10/20/17 Q&A Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. A recording of today s session, the Q&A,
More information2010 Cancer Data Collection Updates: Standards Volume II, Introduction. What s New for 2010
2010 Cancer Data Collection Updates: Standards Volume II, Version 12 NAACCR 2009 2010 Webinar Series Introduction What s New for 2010 Record length and record layout New/changed data items Multiple Primary
More informationCANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I
CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I Changes and Clarifications 16 th Edition April 15, 2016 Quick Look- Updates to Volume
More informationNCDB Vendor Webinar: NCDB Call for Data January 2018 and Upcoming RQRS Revisions
NCDB Vendor Webinar: NCDB Call for Data January 2018 and Upcoming RQRS Revisions American American College College of of Surgeons 2013 Content 2014 Content cannot be be reproduced or or repurposed without
More informationI.2 CNExT This section was software specific and deleted in 2008.
CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES FOR HOSPITALS California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I Changes and Clarifications 8th th Edition Revised May 2008 SECTION
More informationReview of C-CDA R1.1 Allergy and Intolerance templates
Review of C-CDA R1.1 Allergy and Intolerance templates Lisa R. Nelson March 26, 2014 This work is copyrighted by Janie Appleseed and made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No
More informationCommission on Cancer Updates
Commission on Cancer Updates OBJECTIVES PROVIDE CANCER REGISTRARS WITH INFORMATION ABOUT CURRENT COC 2018 CHANGES DISCUSS CHANGES RELATED TO CANCER REGISTRY DATA COLLECTION DISCUSS CHANGES RELATED TO CANCER
More informationSetting the stage for change: upgrading the physician cancer case reporting application in New York
Setting the stage for change: upgrading the physician cancer case reporting application in New York April Austin New York State Cancer Registry (NYSCR) July 12, 2018 June 13, 2018 Aerial view of Thousand
More informationStandards for Cancer Registries, Volume II: Data Standards and Data Dictionary, Eighth Edition. COC Collect. COC Transmit
10 Record Type R R NAACCR 20 Patient ID Number R R R Reporting Registry 30 Registry Type NAACCR 35 FIN Coding System S NAACCR 37 Reserved 00 40 Registry ID S R R NAACCR 50 NAACCR Record Version R R NAACCR
More informationRegistrar s Guide to Chapter 1, AJCC Seventh Edition. Overview. Learning Objectives. Describe intent and purpose of AJCC staging
Registrar s Guide to Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Validating science. Improving patient care. This presentation was supported by the Cooperative Agreement Number DP13-1310 from The Centers for Disease Control
More informationCancer as a Disease. Linda D. Rego, CTR March 2009
Cancer as a Disease Linda D. Rego, CTR March 2009 Historic perspective First records date as early as 2500 B.C. In Egypt recorded on papyrus Outlines pharmacological, mechanical and magical treatments
More informationEXPLORING THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF REGISTRY DATA ON STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS
EXPLORING THE INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF REGISTRY DATA ON STAGE OF DISEASE AT DIAGNOSIS Richard Porter Catherine N. Correa John P. Fulton Holly L. Howe Chris Newton Judy Nowak Steven D. Roffers This paper
More informationPurpose. Encourage standard exchange of data between two key public health partners
Reporting Pathology Protocols for Colorectal Cancer 2005 NAACCR Conference: June 9, 2005 Ken Gerlach: CDC-NPCR Bette Smith: Ohio Cancer Registry Kathleen Davidson-Allen: PHI/California Cancer Registry
More information4/10/2018. SEER EOD and Summary Stage. Overview KCR 2018 SPRING TRAINING. What is SEER EOD? Ambiguous Terminology General Guidelines
SEER EOD and Summary Stage KCR 2018 SPRING TRAINING Overview What is SEER EOD Ambiguous Terminology General Guidelines EOD Primary Tumor EOD Regional Nodes EOD Mets SEER Summary Stage 2018 Site Specific
More informationWe re on the Web! Visit us at VOLUME 19 ISSUE 1. January 2015
VOLUME 19 ISSUE 1 January 2015 We re on the Web! Visit us at www.kumc.edu/kcr January is National Cervical Cancer Screening Month. Cervical cancer begins in the lining of the cervix (organ connecting the
More informationMU - Selection & Configuration of Measures
MU - Selection & Configuration of Measures Presenter: Christy Erickson October 14, 2011 Objectives Review the 15 Core Measures and highlight some findings from the field Discuss the MU Menu and Clinical
More informationAJCC TNM STAGING UPDATES ARE YOU READY FOR TNM?
AJCC TNM STAGING UPDATES ARE YOU READY FOR TNM? FCRA Annual Conference Boca Raton, Florida 7/26/2016 Steven Peace, CTR 1 Introduction Order AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th ed. How To Use - AJCC Cancer
More informationThe Components of an Abstract. Alfreda Woods, BS, CHES, CTR Program Manager, DCCR DelMarVa-DC Educational Conference October 12, 2018
The Components of an Abstract Alfreda Woods, BS, CHES, CTR Program Manager, DCCR DelMarVa-DC Educational Conference October 12, 2018 1 Abstracts Should Tell A Story 2 The Components of an Abstract Who
More informationClinical Policy: Nivolumab (Opdivo) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.121
Clinical Policy: (Opdivo) Reference Number: CP.PHAR.121 Effective Date: 07/15 Last Review Date: 04/17 Coding Implications Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory
More informationNotes for slide 2 Welcome to today s training webinar. We appreciate everyone taking time today to hear our presentations. We are very excited to fina
Notes for slide 2 Welcome to today s training webinar. We appreciate everyone taking time today to hear our presentations. We are very excited to finally be able to put these genomics related data items
More informationMCR: MANAGEMENT OF 2018 CHANGES. By: Maricarmen Traverso-Ortiz MPH, CGG, CTR
MCR: MANAGEMENT OF 2018 CHANGES By: Maricarmen Traverso-Ortiz MPH, CGG, CTR LEARNING OBJECTIVES Discuss a summary of the new changes for 2018 Overview of how the Maryland Cancer Registry is managing and
More informationEHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet
EHR Incentive Programs for Eligible Professionals: What You Need to Know for 2015 Tipsheet CMS recently published a final rule that specifies criteria that eligible professionals (EPs), eligible hospitals,
More informationPublic Health Meaningful Use: Views from the Field. HIMSS HIE Roundtable May 19, 2011
Public Health Meaningful Use: Views from the Field HIMSS HIE Roundtable May 19, 2011 Public Health and Meaningful Use: Views from the Field HIMSS HIE Roundtable May 19, 2011 Noam H. Arzt President, HLN
More informationRequirements for Abstracted Text
Slide 1 Requirements for Abstracted Text Principles of Abstracting Lesson 3: Purpose of Text Slide 2 Available Text Fields Place of Diagnosis Immunotherapy Chemotherapy Hormone Therapy Other Therapy Radiation
More informationSeventh Edition Staging 2017 Breast
Seventh Edition Staging 2017 Breast Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Validating science. Improving patient care. No materials in this presentation may be repurposed in print or online without the express written
More informationNAACCR Webinar Series 1
NAACCR 2009 2010 Webinar Series Collecting Cancer Data: Kidney 1 Questions Please use the Q&A panel to submit your questions Send questions to All Panelist 2 Fabulous Prizes 3 NAACCR 2009 2010 Webinar
More informationIntroduction & Descriptors
AJCC 8 th Edition Staging Introduction & Descriptors Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Technical Editor, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual First Author, Chapter 1: Principles of Cancer Staging Validating science. Improving
More informationCMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017
CMS-3311-P 100 TABLE 6: MEANINGFUL USES OBJECTIVES AND MEASURES FOR 2015 THROUGH 2017 Provider Type Eligible Professional Proposed Objectives for 2015, 2016 and 2017 CPOE Prescribing Clinical Decision
More informationOSCaR UPDATE. Manager s Update Donald Shipley, MS. Oregon State Cancer Registry
Oregon State Cancer Registry OSCaR UPDATE VOLUME 8, QUARTER 4 W INTER 2008 Manager s Update Donald Shipley, MS Since the Fall issue of OSCaR Update, the registry staff has completed several significant
More informationCERVIX MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS
Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) CERVIX MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS Introduction The Commission on Cancer s (CoC) National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) staff has undertaken an effort to improve
More informationImplementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries
Implementation Guide for Ambulatory Healthcare Provider Reporting to Central Cancer Registries HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Release 1.0 August 2012 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention
More informationCCARM. Cancer Collection and Reporting Manual Revised for 2016
This publication was supported by cooperative agreement N.C. U55CCU421885 awarded to the from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and
More informationThis section allows identifying the facility, this information is important for data quality follow up. Source of Standard. Source of Standard
Data Dictionary Case Administration This section allows identifying the facility, this information is important for data quality follow up Facility Name This identifier is needed to evaluate This data
More informationINTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING
INTRODUCTION TO CANCER STAGING Patravoot Vatanasapt, MD Dept. Otorhinolaryngology Khon Kaen Cancer Registry Faculty of Medicine Khon Kaen University THAILAND Staging is the attempt to assess the size
More informationGreater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute
2008 ANNUAL REPORT Greater Baltimore Medical Center Sandra & Malcolm Berman Cancer Institute Cancer Registry Report The Cancer Data Management System/ Cancer Registry collects data on all types of cancer
More informationNational Program of Cancer Registries Advancing E-cancer Reporting and Registry Operations (NPCR-AERRO): Activities Overview
National Program of Cancer Registries Advancing E-cancer Reporting and Registry Operations (NPCR-AERRO): Activities Overview Sandy Jones Public Health Advisor NAACCR 2011 Conference June 22, 2011 National
More informationCANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES FOR HOSPITALS California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I
CANCER REPORTING IN CALIFORNIA: ABSTRACTING AND CODING PROCEDURES FOR HOSPITALS California Cancer Reporting System Standards, Volume I SUMMARY OF YEAR 2004 DATA CHANGES This document will provide a summary
More informatione. For the purposes of this instruction the terms cancer and tumor are considered interchangeable.
b. That the AFIP s ACTUR shall be utilized as the primary repository for cancer data collection throughout Navy Medicine as described in reference (a). 2. Scope. Applies to all naval medical treatment
More informationA CENTRAL REGISTRY RELIABILITY STUDY
A CENTRAL REGISTRY RELIABILITY STUDY Visual Editor TNM & Summary Stage Staging Skill Assessment Donna M. Hansen, CTR Auditor & Education Training Coordinator California Cancer Registry NAACCR June 16,
More informationSTAGE CATEGORY DEFINITIONS
CLINICAL Extent of disease before any treatment y clinical staging completed after neoadjuvant therapy but before subsequent surgery TX Tis Tis (DCIS) Tis (LCIS) Tis (Paget s) T1 T1mi T1a T1b T1c a b c
More informationNUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade
Quality ID #100 (NQF 0392): Colorectal Cancer Resection Pathology Reporting: pt Category (Primary Tumor) and pn Category (Regional Lymph Nodes) with Histologic Grade National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective
More informationOutline. How to Use the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th ed. 7/9/2015 FCDS ANNUAL CONFERENCE ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA JULY 30, 2015.
1 How to Use the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7 th ed. FCDS ANNUAL CONFERENCE ST PETERSBURG, FLORIDA JULY 30, 2015 Steven Peace, CTR Outline 2 History, Purpose and Background Purchase and Ordering Information
More informationASCR Data Items for V14 ASCR Requirement: R - Required Fields, S - Supplemental Fields, * - When available CR Only - only need for Central Registry
ASCR Data Items for V14 ASCR Requirement: R - Required Fields, S - Supplemental Fields, * - When available CR Only - only need for Central Registry Data Item Name Data Item Number NPCR Collect Recommendation
More informationDENOMINATOR: All melanoma pathology reports for primary malignant cutaneous melanoma
Quality ID #397: Melanoma Reporting National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination Meaningful Measure Area: Transfer of Health Information and Interoperability 2019 COLLECTION TYPE:
More informationAJCC 8 th Edition Staging. Introduction & Descriptors. Learning Objectives. This webinar is sponsored by
AJCC 8 th Edition Staging Introduction & Descriptors Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Technical Editor, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual First Author, Chapter 1: Principles of Cancer Staging Validating science. Improving
More informationIHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement. Early Hearing Care Plan (EHCP) Trial Implementation
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE Quality, Research and Public Health Technical Framework Supplement 10 Early Hearing Care Plan (EHCP) Trial Implementation 15 20 Date: September 2, 2011 Author:
More informationAbstract Code Manual
16th Edition Abstract Code Manual MISSOURI CANCER REGISTRY AND RESEARCH CENTER University of Missouri Columbia 2016 Revised Missouri Cancer Registry and Research Center Abstract Code Manual 16th Edition
More informationBREAST CANCER IN IDAHO
BREAST CANCER IN IDAHO 1997-2001 1 2 3 4 5 7 6 Non-Hospital Mammography Facilities Idaho Hospitals Health Districts Idaho County Boundaries This PowerPoint presentation was created as a collaborative effort
More informationAPPENDIX D: ASCR REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS (Version 13)
APPENDIX D: ASCR REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS (Version 13) New Required Item by ASCR R - Required Fields, S - Supplemental Fields, * - When available CR Only - only need for Central Registry Data NPCR Collect
More informationA Comprehensive Approach to. International Cancer Survival Benchmarking. SurvMark-2
A Comprehensive Approach to International Cancer Survival Benchmarking SurvMark-2 Call for Data Data specification June 2016 The deadline for data submission will be 15 September 2016 and it is essential
More informationAJCC TNM 6 th Edition Staging Input Data Dictionary
Catalogue no. 82-225-XIE No. 001 ISSN: 1715-2100 O ISBN: 0-662-41801-8 Manuals AJCC TNM 6 th Edition Staging Input Data Dictionary by Michel Cormier Health Statistics Division Client Custom Services Room
More informationThere is no longer a non-reportable list of terms. If a term you are looking for does not appear on this list, the case is NOT reportable.
Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program October 2006 Update Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP) Cancer Reporting Manual ~ Coming soon! An updated copy of the MCSP Cancer Reporting Manual will be available
More informationCancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS)
MEASURE SPECIFICATIOS Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS) Introduction The Commission on Cancer s (CoC) ational Cancer Data Base (CDB) staff has undertaken
More informationThe North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR) Interoperability Activities
The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, Inc. (NAACCR) Interoperability Activities Lori A. Havener, CTR Program Manager of Standards Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2008 Annual
More informationPart VIII Entering Information Into the Urology Report Form
North Carolina Central Cancer Registry Instructions and Reporting Requirements Module 8 Electronic Reporting For Urology Physician Practices May 2013 North Carolina Central Cancer Registry State Center
More informationFCDS TENTATIVE V11 TO V11.1 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
NAACCR V11.1 UPDATES ZIP CODE, FIPS COUNTY, FLORIDA CITY NAME VERIFICATION FILE (COMMA SEPARATED TEXT FILE) CANCER TRAINING: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF CANCER REGISTRATION, SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL, JULY
More information2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process
Quality ID #264: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Invasive Breast Cancer National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care Meaningful Measure Area: Appropriate Use of Healthcare 2019 COLLECTION TYPE:
More informationAJCC 8 th Edition Staging. Introduction & Descriptors. Learning Objectives. This webinar is sponsored by
AJCC 8 th Edition Staging Introduction & Descriptors Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Technical Editor, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual First Author, Chapter 1: Principles of Cancer Staging Validating science. Improving
More informationEvaluation of Abstracting: Cancers Diagnosed in MCSS Quality Control Report 2005:2. Elaine N. Collins, M.A., R.H.I.A., C.T.R
Evaluation of Abstracting: Cancers Diagnosed in 2001 MCSS Quality Control Report 2005:2 Elaine N. Collins, M.A., R.H.I.A., C.T.R Jane E. Braun, M.S., C.T.R John Soler, M.P.H September 2005 Minnesota Department
More informationDESCRIPTION: Percentage of final reports for screening mammograms that are classified as probably benign
Quality ID #146 (NQF 0508): Radiology: Inappropriate Use of Probably Benign Assessment Category in Screening Mammograms National Quality Strategy Domain: Efficiency and Cost Reduction 2018 OPTIONS F INDIVIDUAL
More information2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Process High Priority
Quality ID #440: Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)/Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC): Biopsy Reporting Time Pathologist to Clinician National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination Meaningful
More informationSeventh Edition Staging 2017 Melanoma. Overview. This webinar is sponsored by. the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Seventh Edition Staging 2017 Melanoma Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Validating science. Improving patient care. No materials in this presentation may be repurposed in print or online without the express written
More informationElectronic Health Records (EHR) HP Provider Relations October 2012
Electronic Health Records (EHR) HP Provider Relations October 2012 Agenda Session Objectives Electronic Health Record (EHR) EHR Incentive Program Certified Technology EHR Meaningful Use EHR Incentive Program
More informationIHE QRPH Technical Framework Supplement. Clinical Research Process Content (CRPC) Trial Implementation
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise 5 IHE QRPH Technical Framework Supplement 10 Clinical Research Process Content (CRPC) 15 Trial Implementation Date: August 27, 2012 20 Author: Email: IHE QRPH Technical
More informationMCR MINI UPDATE DECEMBER 2017
Fellow Registrars, MCR staff are very busy in November double checking our data before sending it to the national level, but we still have some important news, tips and resources to share with you. DUE
More informationGary M. Levin, BA, CTR FCDS Annual Conference 7/26/2017
Gary M. Levin, BA, CTR FCDS Annual Conference 7/26/2017 Presentation Overview Background Methods Results Conclusions 2 1 Background Increase physician reporting Capture missing first course treatment Capture
More information2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Process
Quality ID #440: Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)/Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC): Biopsy Reporting Time Pathologist to Clinician National Quality Strategy Domain: Communication and Care Coordination 2018 OPTIONS
More informationInteractive Staging Bee
Interactive Staging Bee ROBIN BILLET, MA, CTR GA/SC REGIONAL CONFERENCE NOVEMBER 6, 2018? Clinical Staging includes any information obtained about the extent of cancer obtained before initiation of treatment
More information5/8/2014. AJCC Stage Introduction and General Rules. Acknowledgements* Introduction. Melissa Pearson, CTR North Carolina Central Cancer Registry
AJCC Stage Introduction and General Rules Linda Mulvihill Public Health Advisor NCRA Annual Meeting May 2014 National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Cancer Prevention
More informationCancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract
Cancer Registrars: Beyond the Abstract Presented by Melissa Smith, RHIT, CTR Director of Client Services CHAMPS Oncology Objectives Identify what is a Certified Tumor Registrar (CTR) and how someone becomes
More informationComparative Analysis of Stage and Other Prognostic Factors Among Urethral, Ureteral, and Renal Pelvis Malignant Tumors
Comparative Analysis of Stage and Other Prognostic Factors Among Urethral, Ureteral, and Renal Pelvis Malignant Tumors Presented to NAACCR Annual Conference 2012 Serban Negoita, MD, DrPH; Marsha Dunn,
More informationEvolution of CoC within ACoS. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,2005
American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,25 FREDERICK L. GREENE, MD Chair, Commission on Cancer Evolution of CoC within ACoS Two plans proposed
More informationON-LINE REGISTRATION FCDS MONOGRAPH: 2004 ADMISSIONS (TOTAL), ANALYTIC CASES ONLY FLORIDA ANNUAL CANCER REPORT: 2001 INCIDENCE
ON-LINE REGISTRATION FOR THE FCDS ANNUAL CONFERENCE, JULY 27-28, 2006, AND BROCHURE FCDS 2006 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR NAACCR VERSION 11 (REVISED 5/22/2006; ADDS NEW AND UPDATED EDITS FOR CASES RECEIVED
More informationCMS EHR Incentive Program: Proposed Rules for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Focus on Eligible Hospitals
CMS EHR Incentive Program: Proposed Rules for Stage 2 and Stage 3 Meaningful Use Focus on Eligible Hospitals April 28, 2015 Hosted by: Sponsored by: Today s Event Sponsored By One of the nation s largest
More informationStaging for Residents, Nurses, and Multidisciplinary Health Care Team
Staging for Residents, Nurses, and Multidisciplinary Health Care Team Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Validating science. Improving patient care. Learning Objectives Introduce the concept and history of stage
More information6. Cervical Lymph Nodes and Unknown Primary Tumors of the Head and Neck
1 Terms of Use The cancer staging form is a specific document in the patient record; it is not a substitute for documentation of history, physical examination, and staging evaluation, or for documenting
More informationCancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS)
O COLON MEASURE SPECIFICATIONS Cancer Programs Practice Profile Reports (CP 3 R) Rapid Quality Reporting System (RQRS) Introduction The Commission on Cancer s (CoC) National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) staff
More informationMeaningful Use Overview
Eligibility Providers may be eligible for incentives from either Medicare or Medicaid, but not both. In addition, providers may not be hospital based. Medicare: A Medicare Eligible Professional (EP) is
More informationData Management for EHDI: Helpful Friend, Not Dreaded Foe
Data Management for EHDI: Helpful Friend, Not Dreaded Foe John Eichwald, Team Lead Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) IFSC/Pediatric Audiology Symposium/SE Regional EHDI Conference October,
More informationDescriptor Definition Author s notes TNM descriptors Required only if applicable; select all that apply multiple foci of invasive carcinoma
S5.01 The tumour stage and stage grouping must be recorded to the extent possible, based on the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (7 th Edition). 11 (See Tables S5.01a and S5.01b below.) Table S5.01a AJCC breast
More informationInteractive Discussion of Part I CS Coding Instructions: Working the Cases
Interactive Discussion of Part I CS Coding Instructions: Working the Cases April Fritz, RHIT, CTR Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR Jennifer Ruhl, RHIT, CCS, CTR This presentation was supported by the Cooperative
More informationNAACR Treatment Webinar Quiz 1
NAACR Treatment Webinar Quiz 1 1. Which of the following would NOT be considered cancer-directed treatment? a. Hemicolectomy b. Incisional biopsy c. Whole breast radiation d. MRI e. All of the above f.
More informationMaking the Most of Your Cancer Registry
www.champsods.com Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry Presenter: Toni Hare, Vice President CHAMPS Oncology Data Services Picture of girl here December 11, 2009 Learning Objectives Upon completion of
More informationNPCR s TNM Stage Calculator
NPCR s TNM Stage Calculator A Tool for Central Registry Quality Control and Consolidation Assistance NAACCR Annual Meeting June 16, 2016 Jennifer Seiffert Northrop Grumman Under contract to NPCR Joseph
More informationQuality ID# 406: Appropriate Follow-up Imaging for Incidental Thyroid Nodules in Patients National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care
Quality ID# 406: Appropriate Follow-up Imaging for Incidental Thyroid Nodules in Patients National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY MEASURE
More informationWG 2 Informatics Standards in Pathology. Dr Christel DANIEL (IHE Anatomic Pathology co-chair) Jacques KLOSSA (DICOM WG26 co-chair) Bernd BLOBEL
WG 2 Informatics Standards in Pathology Dr Christel DANIEL (IHE Anatomic Pathology co-chair) Jacques KLOSSA (DICOM WG26 co-chair) Bernd BLOBEL Agenda Progress report of WG2 IHE/HL7 Anatomic Pathology DCIOM
More informationQ: How do you clinically code the N if the nodes are stated to be positive on mammogram/us or other imaging? No biopsy of nodes was done.
Q&A Breast Webinar Q: One of my investigators is interested in knowing when Oncotype DX data collection was implemented. That data is collected in SSFs 22 and 23. I remember that the SSFs for breast were
More informationNUMERATOR: Reports that include the pt category, the pn category and the histologic grade
Quality ID #100 (NQF 0392): Colorectal Cancer Resection Pathology Reporting: pt Category (Primary Tumor) and pn Category (Regional Lymph Nodes) with Histologic Grade National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective
More informationYou Want ME to Stage that Case???
You Want ME to Stage that Case??? Jayne Holubowsky, CTR, Director, Virginia Cancer Registry 2 nd DelMarVa-DC Regional Conference October 11, 2018 What s New in the AJCC 8 th Edition Objectives Explain
More informationCompleting the Puzzle AJCC TNM Staging Breast. Nicole Catlett, CTR 2017 Kentucky Cancer Registry Fall Conference, September 21 & 22, 2017
Completing the Puzzle AJCC TNM Staging Breast Nicole Catlett, CTR 2017 Kentucky Cancer Registry Fall Conference, September 21 & 22, 2017 OBJECTIVES Understanding of Breast TNM staging Identify clinical
More informationQ&A. Overview. Collecting Cancer Data: Prostate. Collecting Cancer Data: Prostate 5/5/2011. NAACCR Webinar Series 1
Collecting Cancer Data: Prostate NAACCR 2010-2011 Webinar Series May 5, 2011 Q&A Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel Overview NAACCR 2010-2011 Webinar Series 1
More informationCS Tumor Size. We re on the Web! Visit us at www2.kumc.edu/kcr
VOLUME 17 ISSUE 3 July 2013 We re on the Web! Visit us at www2.kumc.edu/kcr July is UV Awareness Month. It is that time of the year again for summer! This is a great opportunity to talk about skin cancer.
More informationGREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER SANDRA & MALCOLM BERMAN CANCER INSTITUTE
GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER SANDRA & MALCOLM BERMAN CANCER INSTITUTE CANCER REGISTRY REPORT The Cancer Data Management System/Cancer Registry collects data on all types of cancer diagnosed or treated
More information46. Merkel Cell Carcinoma
1 Terms of Use The cancer staging form is a specific document in the patient record; it is not a substitute for documentation of history, physical examination, and staging evaluation, or for documenting
More informationDESCRIPTION: Percentage of final reports for screening mammograms that are classified as probably benign
Measure #146 (NQF 0508): Radiology: Inappropriate Use of Probably Benign Assessment Category in Screening Mammograms National Quality Strategy Domain: Efficiency and Cost Reduction 2016 PQRS OPTIONS F
More informationChange Log V1.3- v1.4
Change Log V1.3- v1.4 This document shows the changes that were made to the SSDI manual and the Grade manual for the SEER*RSA version 1.4 release on (Date TBD). SSDI Manual Section: General Instructions
More informationD9995 and D9996 ADA Guide to Understanding and Documenting Teledentistry Events
D9995 and D9996 ADA Guide Version 1 July 17, 2017 Page 1 of 10 D9995 and D9996 ADA Guide to Understanding and Documenting Teledentistry Events Developed by the ADA, this guide is published to educate dentists
More informationPlease submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. Reminder:
NAACCR 2015-2016 Clinical Outcomes and Webinar Quality Series Improvement: Oncology Dashboard Drivers NAACCR Webinar Series 2016 2017 Lisa D. Landvogt, BA, CTR LLandvo1@hfhs.org Jocelyn Hoopes, MLIS, CTR,
More informationOverview...3. Cancer Program.4. Breast Cancer with 5-year Survival Analysis...6. Systemic Therapy.7. Stage of Breast Cancer Diagnosed in
2011 Annual Report Table Of Contents Overview...3 Cancer Program.4 Breast Cancer with 5-year Survival Analysis...6 Systemic.7 Stage of Breast Cancer Diagnosed in 2008..8 Radiation and Systemic Only...9
More information