AGENDA VILLAGE OF LISLE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES WORKSHOP SESSION

Transcription

1 AGENDA VILLAGE OF LISLE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES WORKSHOP SESSION VILLAGE HALL BOARD ROOM 95 BURLINGTON AVENUE, LISLE, IL MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 08 7:00 PM. Call to Order, Roll Call, Pledge of Allegiance. Illinois Department of Transportation Multi-Year Improvement Program. Backyard Chickens 4. Maintenance of Rights of Way 5. Village Board Meeting Agenda & Procedural Updates 6. Public Comment 7. Village Board/Village Staff Comments 8. Adjourn THIS AGENDA IS ALSO AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATE FORMATS UPON REQUEST. NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO HAS A DISABILITY REQUIRING A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING SHOULD CONTACT ADA COORDINATOR, JACK KNIGHT, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY 8 A.M. TO 4:0 P.M. VILLAGE OF LISLE, 95 BURLINGTON AVENUE, LISLE, IL 605; OR CALL VOICE OR TDD, WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME BEFORE THE MEETING. REQUESTS FOR A QUALIFIED INTERPRETER REQUIRE FIVE WORKING DAYS ADVANCE NOTICE.

2 Village of Lisle Board Workshop Item September 7, 08 Agenda Item: Illinois Department of Transportation s Multi-Year Improvement Program Date: September, 08 Prepared by: Eric Ertmoed, Village Manager Discussion: The Illinois Department of Transportation s Multi-Year Improvement Program (MYP) provides information on a six-year maintenance program for Illinois transportation system that includes roads and bridges. Attached is the FY -04 Proposed Highway Improvement Program for District, DuPage County. As part of the September 7, 08 Village Board Workshop, Perry Masouridis, P.E. of IDOT s Bureau of Programming for District will be present to provide an overview of agency s MYP and highlight proposed Lisle-area improvements. Attachments: IDOT s FY -04 Proposed Highway Improvement Program District DuPage County Requested Action: Village Board review and discussion pertaining to the presented material is requested.

3 FY -04 Proposed Highway Improvement Program HIGHWAY REGION DISTRICT DUPAGE COUNTY TABLE OF CONTENTS State Roadway Project Descriptions Local Roadway Project Descriptions MAPS DuPage County

4 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years I 55 Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current OVER LEMONT RD BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $,000,000 WOODRIDGE ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. Structure Information AADT Truck Pct Str Number NHS Rating 47, Y 4 I 55 OVER LEMONT RD P.E. (PHASE II) $500,000 WOODRIDGE ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. I 55 OVER LEMONT RD P.E. (PHASE II) $600,000 WOODRIDGE ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. I 55 OVER LEMONT RD UTILITY ADJUSTMENT $00,000 WOODRIDGE 4 ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. I 55 OVER LEMONT RD CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $,60,000 WOODRIDGE 4 ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. I 55 STREAM 0.9 MI E OF CASS AVE CULVERT REPAIR $465,000 I 55 AT CLARENDON HILLS RD BRIDGE REHABILITATION $,000,000 BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE Structure Information AADT Truck Pct Str Number NHS Rating, N 4-9

5 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years I 55 Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost OVER MADISON ST BRIDGE SUBSTRUCTURE $,50,000 WILLOWBROOK 4 BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR City Past Structure Information AADT Truck Pct Str Number NHS Rating 64, Y 4 Current I 90 ILL 90 TO GRAND AVE & I-88 TO E OF AUSTIN AVE Miles =. PRESERVATION PROJECT ULTRA-THIN BND WR COURSE $7,000,000 ITASCA ADDISON WOOD DALE ELMHURST HILLSIDE WESTCHESTER BELLWOOD BROADVIEW MAYWOOD FOREST PARK OAK PARK CHICAGO I 90 AT SALT CREEK CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $,00,000 ADDISON 5 ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECT. I 90 US 0 AT EMROY AVE BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $470,000 ELMHURST BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT I 55 I-90 TO ARMY TRAIL RD Miles =.75 ULTRA-THIN BND WR COURSE $,500,000 ITASCA ADDISON PRESERVATION PROJECT US 0 LAKE ST ELGIN-O'HARE EXPWY TO ROSEDALE AVE P.E. (PHASE I) $,400,000 ROSELLE 6 HANOVER PARK BLOOMINGDALE - 9

6 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years US 0 Route/Street LAKE ST Location Improvements Est. Cost AT GARY AVE TRAF SIGNAL MODERNIZATION $,90,000 HANOVER PARK CHANNELIZATION SIGNING (NEW) City Past Current US 0 LAKE ST AT GARY AVE LAND ACQUISITION $,00,000 HANOVER PARK 4 US 0 LAKE ST W OF SUMMERFIELD DR TO W OF I-55 (VETERANS MEMORIAL TOLLWAY) Miles =.6 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,70,000 ROSELLE BLOOMINGDALE ADDISON Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.6 ACCEPTABLE 0.0 9,5 7.7 Y US 0 LAKE ST N OF MAPLE CT TO S OF CARDINAL ST Miles = 0.64 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $60,000 ADDISON Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.64 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0. 5, N US 4 OGDEN AVE KANE / KENDALL CO LINE TO VILLAGE GREEN DR Miles =.94 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,600,000 AURORA Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.7 ACCEPTABLE 0.0, Y 0.77 GOOD 0.0 6, Y US 4 OGDEN AVE FRONTENAC ST TO SHANDREW DR Miles =.8 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,765,000 NAPERVILLE AURORA Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.8 ACCEPTABLE 0.0 7,766.7 Y - 94

7 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years US 4 Route/Street OGDEN AVE Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT RICKERT DR INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT $,500,000 NAPERVILLE US 4 OGDEN AVE AT ST JOSEPH CREEK 0. MI E OF ILL 5 BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $40,000 LISLE BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT US 4 OGDEN AVE IVANHOE AVE TO E OF ILL 8 (KINGERY HWY) Miles = 6.0 Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 6.0 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.4 9, Y ADA IMPROVEMENTS $5,890,000 LISLE DOWNERS GROVE WESTMONT CLARENDON HILLS HINSDALE ILL 9 IRVING PARK RD 0. MI W OF MITCHELL BLVD TO BAKER DR Miles =.40 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,890,000 SCHAUMBURG ROSELLE ITASCA Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.95 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0. 4, N 0.68 NOT ACCEPTABLE.77 NOT ACCEPTABLE , Y 5, N ILL 9 IRVING PARK RD BAKER DR TO ILL 8 CRACK & JOINT SEALING $50,000 ITASCA WOOD DALE BENSENVILLE PRESERVATION PROJECT - 95

8 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD E OF TECHNOLOGY BLVD TO WINFIELD RD Miles = 5.00 ADA IMPROVEMENTS RR FLAGGER $4,66,000 WEST CHICAGO WINFIELD Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 5.00 ACCEPTABLE 0., Y ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD AT WINFIELD RD INTERSECTION RECONSTN $6,000,000 WINFIELD 8 ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD AT WINFIELD RD LAND ACQUISITION $,40,000 WINFIELD 9 ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD WINFIELD RD TO COUNTY FARM RD Miles = 0.9 WIDENING & $,000,000 WINFIELD WHEATON Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.9 ACCEPTABLE 0. 8, Y ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD WINFIELD RD TO COUNTY FARM RD LAND ACQUISITION $900,000 WINFIELD WHEATON ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD COUNTY FARM RD TO PIERCE AVE Miles = 0.7 $577,000 WHEATON Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.7 ACCEPTABLE 0., Y - 96

9 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years ILL 8 Route/Street ROOSEVELT RD Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT COUNTY FARM RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT $6,950,000 WHEATON BRIDGE REPLACEMENT Structure Information AADT Truck Pct Str Number NHS Rating 8, Y 5 ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD AT COUNTY FARM RD LAND ACQUISITION $,600,000 WHEATON WINFIELD ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD AT COUNTY FARM RD & WINFIELD RD TO COUNTY FARM RD CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $,50,000 WHEATON WINFIELD ILL 8 N FR RD AT SALT CREEK 0. MI E OF W BUTTERFIELD RD BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $40,000 ELMHURST BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT ILL 8 ROOSEVELT RD AT SALT CREEK 0.5 MI W OF ILL 8 BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $,00,000 ELMHURST BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT ILL 5 ROHLWING RD SIDNEY AVE TO ST. CHARLES RD Miles =.8 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $850,000 ADDISON LOMBARD Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.8 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0. 0, 4.6 Y - 97

10 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current ILL 5 COLUMBINE AVE OVER GREAT NORTHERN TRAIL 0.8 MI S OF ILL 64 (NORTH AVE) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $4,805,000 LOMBARD Structure Information AADT Truck Pct Str Number NHS Rating 9, Y 4 ILL 5 COLUMBINE AVE OVER GREAT NORTHERN TRAIL 0.8 MI S OF ILL 64 (NORTH AVE) P.E. (PHASE II) $500,000 LOMBARD ILL 5 COLUMBINE AVE OVER GREAT NORTHERN TRAIL 0.8 MI S OF ILL 64 (NORTH AVE) LAND ACQUISITION $00,000 LOMBARD ILL 5 COLUMBINE AVE ST. CHARLES RD TO BRYANT AVE Miles =.55 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,465,000 LOMBARD GLEN ELLYN Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.55 ACCEPTABLE 0. 9, Y ILL 5 COLUMBINE AVE AT PARKVIEW BLVD / SURREY LN CHANNELIZATION $,500,000 GLEN ELLYN TRAF SIGNAL INSTALLATION ILL 5 BRYANT AVE TO S OF PERSHING AVE Miles = 0.50 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $485,000 GLEN ELLYN Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.0 7, Y - 98

11 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current ILL 5 LINCOLN AVE S OF PERSHING AVE TO S OF I-88 (RONALD REAGAN MEMORIAL HWY) Miles =.85 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,70,000 GLEN ELLYN DOWNERS GROVE LISLE Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.85 ACCEPTABLE 0.0,45 4. Y ILL 5 LINCOLN AVE S OF I-88 (RONALD REAGAN MEMORIAL HWY) TO SHORT ST Miles =.05 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $945,000 LISLE Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.6 6,00 5. Y ILL 5 LINCOLN AVE SHORT ST TO 59TH ST Miles =.5 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,05,000 LISLE Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.5 ACCEPTABLE 0. 8, Y ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD NAPERVILLE RD TO ILL 5 Miles =.6 ADA IMPROVEMENTS RR FLAGGER $,40,000 WHEATON 9 Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.6 ACCEPTABLE 0.6,00.5 Y - 99

12 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD W OF ILL 5 TO W OF I-55 & AT ILL 5 Miles =. RECONSTRUCTION INTERSECTION RECONSTN BRIDGE REHABILITATION ADA IMPROVEMENTS ADDITIONAL LANES NOISE BARRIERS RETAINING WALL $5,45,000 DOWNERS GROVE 7 ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD W OF ILL 5 TO W OF I-55 & AT ILL 5 LAND ACQUISITION $,800,000 DOWNERS GROVE 5 ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD W OF ILL 5 TO W OF I-55 & AT ILL 5 UTILITY ADJUSTMENT $500,000 DOWNERS GROVE 6 ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD W OF ILL 5 TO W OF I-55 & AT ILL 5 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $,000,000 DOWNERS GROVE ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD AT I-55 BRIDGE DECK REPAIRS $8,000 DOWNERS GROVE BRIDGE DECK WATERPROOFING ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD FINLEY RD TO HIGHLAND AVE & RAMPS AT HIGHLAND AVE Miles =.4 ADA IMPROVEMENTS RAMP REPAIR $,00,000 DOWNERS GROVE 9 Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.76 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.5 4, Y ILL 56 BUTTERFIELD RD 0. MI W OF FAIRFIELD AVE TO ND ST Miles =.6 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,900,000 OAK BROOK LOMBARD Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.6 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.5 9,500.5 N - 00

13 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years ILL 56 ILL 8 Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT HIGHLAND AVE & AT ILL 56 BRIDGE REPAIR $75,000 OAKBROOK TERRACE DOWNERS GROVE ILL 59 SUTTON RD AT ARMY TRAIL RD TRAF SIGNAL MODERNIZATION CHANNELIZATION RETAINING WALL NOISE BARRIERS ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,900,000 BARTLETT ILL 59 NELTNOR BLVD ILL 64 (NORTH AVE) TO ILL 8 (ROOSEVELT RD) Miles = 4.00 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,765,000 WEST CHICAGO Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 4.00 ACCEPTABLE 0., 9. Y ILL 59 NELTNOR BLVD AT JAMES AVE & AT JOLIET ST TRAF SIGNAL MODERNIZATION $,000,000 WEST CHICAGO INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT ILL 59 NELTNOR BLVD AT JAMES AVE & AT JOLIET ST LAND ACQUISITION $00,000 WEST CHICAGO ILL 59 NELTNOR BLVD FOREST AVE TO GLEN AVE RETAINING WALL $00,000 WEST CHICAGO ILL 59 NELTNOR BLVD ILL 8 (ROOSEVELT RD) TO BATAVIA RD Miles =.9 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,95,000 WEST CHICAGO WARRENVILLE Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.9 ACCEPTABLE 0. 5,59 8. Y - 0

14 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years ILL 59 Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT GARY'S MILL RD TRAF SIGNAL INSTALLATION $750,000 WEST CHICAGO CHANNELIZATION ILL 59 MCCOY DR TO WILL CO LINE Miles =.0 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,95,000 NAPERVILLE Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.0 ACCEPTABLE ,76 6. Y ILL 64 NORTH AVE ILL 59 (NELTNOR BLVD) TO GARY AVE Miles = 4.6 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $5,0,000 WEST CHICAGO CAROL STREAM Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 4.6 ACCEPTABLE ,44 5. Y ILL 64 NORTH AVE GARY AVE TO ILL 5 (ROHLWING RD) Miles = 4.57 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $6,600,000 CAROL STREAM GLENDALE HEIGHTS LOMBARD 9 Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 4.57 ACCEPTABLE ,98 4. Y ILL 64 AT I-55 BRIDGE DECK REPAIRS $07,000 LOMBARD BRIDGE DECK WATERPROOFING ILL 64 NORTH AVE VILLA AVE TO COOK CO LINE Miles =.49 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,840,000 VILLA PARK ELMHURST Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.49 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0. 7,7 5.7 Y - 0

15 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current ILL 8 KINGERY HWY THIRD AVE. MI N OF I-90 (EISENHOWER EXPWY) TO ILL 7 (ARCHER AVE / 07TH ST) GUARDRAIL END-SECT REPL MILLED RUMBLE STRIP PAVEMENT MARKING RAMP REPAIR SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS SKIDPROOFING TRAF SIGNAL MODERNIZATION $,60,000 ELMHURST VILLA PARK OAKBROOK TERRACE OAK BROOK WESTMONT HINSDALE CLARENDON HILLS WILLOWBROOK BURR RIDGE ADDISON ILL 8 KINGERY HWY DITCH AT ILL 8 (WB) RAMP CULVERT REPLACEMENT $800,000 OAKBROOK TERRACE DRAINAGE ILL 8 ILL 7 KINGERY HWY ILL 56 (BUTTERFIELD RD) TO US /45 (96TH ST) CRACK & JOINT SEALING $7,85,000 OAKBROOK TERRACE OAK BROOK WESTMONT HINSDALE CLARENDON HILLS WILLOWBROOK BURR RIDGE PRESERVATION PROJECT ILL 8 KINGERY HWY AT I-88 BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $,800,000 OAK BROOK BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT ILL 8 KINGERY HWY OVER US 4 (OGDEN AVE) & AT BNSF RR BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY $850,000 HINSDALE BRIDGE JOINT REPAIR PRESERVATION PROJECT ILL 8 KINGERY HWY DITCH 0.6 MI S OF 9ST ST CULVERT REPLACEMENT $50,000-0

16 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years ILL 8 Route/Street KINGERY HWY Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT BLUFF RD TRAF SIGNAL MODERNIZATION MEDIAN BARRIER $600,000 ND ST W OF ILL 8 TO I-94 (TRI-STATE TOLLWAY) Miles =. ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,40,000 OAKBROOK TERRACE OAK BROOK Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS. NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.7,5 6. N GARY'S MILL RD ILL 59 (NELTNOR BLVD) TO ILL 8 (ROOSEVELT RD) Miles = 0.69 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $05,000 WEST CHICAGO Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.69 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.6, N I 55 N FR RD S ELM ST TO ILL 8 (KINGERY HWY) Miles =.66 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $775,000 WILLOWBROOK BURR RIDGE 9 I 55 S FR RD LEMONT RD TO CASS AVE Miles =.59 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $,5,000 WOODRIDGE DARIEN Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS.59 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.9, N ILL 56 N FR RD BOB-O-LINK RD TO BRIARCLIFF RD Miles = 0.5 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $70,000 Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.5 N/A N - 04

17 FY -04 Highway Improvement Program District State Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current YORK RD N OF BRUSH HILL RD TO FR RD N OF I-88 Miles = 0.8 ADA IMPROVEMENTS $05,000 ELMHURST OAK BROOK Roadway Information Miles Roughness(IRI) Rutting AADT Truck Pct NHS 0.8 NOT ACCEPTABLE 0. 7, N - 05

18 FY -0 Highway Improvement Program District Local Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years ILL 9 Route/Street IRVING PARK RD Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past E OF EICKLEMANN DR TO RUSH ST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS $6,000 ITASCA Current ILL 59 W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER TRAIL W DUPAGE WOODS FOREST PRESERVE TO BLACKWELL FOREST PRESERVE BIKEWAY $778,000 WEST CHICAGO ST ST HIGHLAND AVE TO MEYERS RD BIKEWAY $699,000 DOWNERS GROVE 6 OAK BROOK 75TH ST LYMAN AVE TO S WILLIAMS ST Miles = 0.99 WIDENING & $,47,000 DOWNERS GROVE 8RD ST OVER I-55 BRIDGE REHABILITATION $400,000 WOODRIDGE LISLE ARLINGTON DR AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $,000,000 HANOVER PARK ARLINGTON DR AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $0,000 HANOVER PARK ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD PIERCE RD TO THORNDALE RD Miles = 0. RECONSTRUCTION $48,000 ITASCA CH 5 55TH ST DUNHAM RD TO CLARENDON HILLS RD Miles =.7 WIDENING & $,9,000 DOWNERS GROVE WESTMONT CLARENDON HILLS - 94

19 FY -0 Highway Improvement Program District Local Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street DIEHL RD Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past E OF DAVID PKWY TO WINFIELD RD CHANNELIZATION $750,000 WARRENVILLE Current EOLA RD ILLINOIS PRAIRIE PATH N OF FERRY RD TO I-88 (RONALD REAGAN MEMORIAL TOLLWAY) BIKEWAY $,65,000 GENEVA RD AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $,77,000 ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. GENEVA RD AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $96,000 ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. GREENBROOK BLVD LAKE ST TO ARLINGTON DR Miles = 0.6 RECONSTRUCTION $,990,000 HANOVER PARK 9 HARRISON AVE GARY AVE TO COLLEGE AVE Miles =.64 $709,000 WHEATON HARRISON AVE GARY AVE TO COLLEGE AVE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $5,000 WHEATON KUHN RD ARMY TRAIL RD TO 0. MI S OF LIES RD BIKEWAY $67,000 CAROL STREAM LIES RD GARY AVE TO SCHMALE RD BIKEWAY $5,000 CAROL STREAM - 95

20 FY -0 Highway Improvement Program District Local Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street MACK RD Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past ILL 59 TO BLACKWELL MCKEE MARCH PARKING LOT BIKEWAY $68,000 WARRENVILLE Current MACK RD ILL 59 TO BLACKWELL MCKEE MARCH PARKING LOT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $5,000 WARRENVILLE MAIN ST CHURCH RD TO YORK RD Miles = 0.47 RECONSTRUCTION $88,000 BENSENVILLE 6 MAIN ST S OF LINDEN ST TO S OF PENNSYLVANIA AVE Miles = 0.40 $89,000 GLEN ELLYN N CENTRAL DUPAGE REGIONAL TRAIL ARMY TRAIL RD ILLINOIS PRARIE PATH TO FOREST PRESERVE DR BIKEWAY $,800,000 WAYNE N CENTRAL DUPAGE REGIONAL TRAIL ARMY TRAIL RD ILLINOIS PRARIE PATH TO FOREST PRESERVE DR CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $50,000 WAYNE PRESIDENT ST BLANCHARD ST ILL 8 TO S OF TARA CT Miles =.4 $79,000 WHEATON S SCHMALE RD GUNDERSON DR S PRESIDENT ST S SCHMALE RD: N OF GUNDERSON RD TO MAIN PL; GUNDERSON RD: S SCHMALE RD TO S PRESIDENT ST; S PRESIDENT ST: GREAT WESTERN TRAIL TO GUNDERSON DR & COMMUNITY PK TO GENEVA RD BIKEWAY $,0,000 CAROL STREAM SPRINGFIELD DR LAKE ST TO SCHICK RD Miles =. $55,000 BLOOMINGDALE - 96

21 FY -0 Highway Improvement Program District Local Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street ST CHARLES RD Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past AT SALT CREEK BRIDGE REHABILITATION $,596,000 VILLA PARK Current ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. ST CHARLES RD AT SALT CREEK CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $,000 VILLA PARK ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. VARIOUS DUPAGE RIVER TRAIL - BENEDICTINE CONNECTOR BIKEWAY $,670,000 6 WARRENVILLE RD BATAVIA RD RIVER RD WARRENVILLE RD: BEHRS CIRCLE DR E TO WINFIELD RD; BATAVIA RD: 0. MI S OF MAIN ST TO WARRENVILLE RD; RIVER RD: 0. MI N OF ROGERS AVE TO WARRENVILLE RD CHANNELIZATION $787,000 WARRENVILLE 5 WARRENVILLE RD CH AT E BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $,500,000 LISLE ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. WARRENVILLE RD CH AT E BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $40,000 LISLE ILLINOIS MAJOR BRIDGE PROGRAM LOCAL PROJECT; CONTINGENT UPON LOCAL AGENCY PROVIDING MATCHING FUNDS. WASHINGTON ST AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER P.E. (PHASE II) $04,000 NAPERVILLE WASHINGTON ST AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT $5,40,000 NAPERVILLE - 97

22 FY -0 Highway Improvement Program District Local Highways DUPAGE COUNTY MYP Years Route/Street WASHINGTON ST Location Improvements Est. Cost City Past Current AT W BRANCH DUPAGE RIVER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $44,000 NAPERVILLE WASHINGTON ST CN / UP RR TO ARBOR AVE Miles = 0.7 $60,000 WEST CHICAGO YORK RD HARGER RD YORK RD: BRUSH HILL RD TO HARGER RD; HARGER RD: I-88 RAMP (WB) TO YORK RD Miles = 0.4 RECONSTRUCTION WIDENING & $,00,000 OAK BROOK ELMHURST YORK RD HARGER RD YORK RD: BRUSH HILL RD TO HARGER RD; HARGER RD: I-88 RAMP (WB) TO YORK RD CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING $8,000 OAK BROOK ELMHURST - 98

23 Schaumburg 9 : 8 : 9 9 : 9 Itasca 0 / 0 Bloomingdale! Chicago Wood Dale Itasca Hanover Park Wayne Elk Grove Village 90 9 Roselle! Bartlett 5 : 9 Bensenville! 55 St Charles Carol Stream 59 : 9 Glendale Hts 90 Addison 64 : 9 l! West Chicago 8 : 9! l! 5 : Oakbrook Terrace Oak Brook Warrenville 9 : 88 Downers Grove Lisle! Aurora 4 / : 55 Naperville Darien Darien Woodridge Bolingbrook SPOT ROADWAY BRIDGE l 55 Lemont 55 Burr Ridge l # Clarendon Hills Willowbrook FY FY HIGHWAY # Hinsdale l PROPOSED FY -04 HIGHWAY PROGRAM 4 / 0 Westmont REGION DISTRICT DUPAGE COUNTY 56 : : Wheaton!! 56 Elmhurst Villa Lombard Park! ll l DUPAGE Glen Ellyn Winfield! : 9 8 : 9

24 Village of Lisle Board Workshop Agenda Item September 7, 08 Agenda Item: Prepared By: Discussion Regarding Backyard Chickens Michael Smetana, AICP, Development Services Director Date: September, 08 Discussion: Allowing Lisle residents to keep backyard chickens was last discussed at the December, 07 Village Board Workshop. During the meeting, several questions were raised regarding the prevalence of municipalities allowing the keeping of backyard chickens, related health regulations, and general public opinion regarding their presence in the community. Staff has compiled the questions that were raised and has prepared itemized responses below.. Why do some towns prohibit chickens? Staff conducted research to determine backyard chicken requirements in other jurisdictions. A summary of staff s findings is attached as Exhibit. Additional research was conducted to determine why some jurisdictions prohibit chickens. The Village of Glen Ellyn has never allowed backyard chickens. While there has been inquiries, the Village of Glen Ellyn staff state that a text amendment to allow for backyard chickens has never been pursued. Village of Woodridge staff recently prepared a text amendment to allow for backyard chickens, however, the majority of the Village Board was not in favor of establishing regulations allowing for backyard chickens. Backyard chickens remain prohibited in the Village of Woodridge.. How will the Village monitor the coops to ensure that the chickens are safe? The Village s property maintenance code contains numerous provisions relating to the maintenance of structures and property. These provisions ensure sanitation, public health, safety, and welfare. Title 9, Chapter, of the Village Code establishes regulations relating to animal care and animal cruelty. With the transition of property maintenance enforcement responsibilities to the Community Service Officer Unit, maintenance issues related to backyard chickens would be actively monitored as part of the unit s normal property maintenance monitoring and enforcement activities.

25 In addition to the requirements already codified in the Village Code, specific regulations pertaining to the proper maintenance of coops could be codified as part of an amendment to the Village Code if it is the Board s determination to proceed with allowing backyard chickens.. How many chicken permits have been issued in other towns? Downers Grove has issued 0 permits since 04 Naperville has issued permits since If there was a lot area requirement, how many properties would qualify or be disqualified? While a lot area requirement would impact how many properties qualify for backyard chickens, it is staff s opinion that subdivision covenants would have a more significant impact. Village staff contacted the known homeowner associations within the Village. Green Trails Improvement Association did respond stating that the Green Trails Covenants currently prohibit the keeping of any livestock or poultry. In response to this question, staff also conducted a parcel inventory utilizing GIS. The parcel inventory is attached as Exhibit. The inventory could be utilized to determine the percentage of properties that would be impacted by certain potential lot area requirements, with larger set back requirements resulting in fewer properties being eligible. 5. Is there public health data? In response to this question, staff conducted research through the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CDC indicates that there has been Salmonella cases in 44 states linked to backyard chickens in 08. Since 000, Salmonella outbreaks linked to backyard chickens has resulted in 4,794 illnesses, 894 hospitalizations, and 7 deaths. The CDC offers numerous educational resources related to disease identification and prevention. Those resources are attached as Exhibit. 6. Public outreach / opinion To ascertain public opinion regarding backyard chickens, staff conducted a community survey. The survey received,07 responses. The full survey results are attached as Exhibit 4. In summary, 78.% of respondents supported the idea of allowing for backyard chickens with notice to neighbors. 80.6% of respondents did not believe that there should be a minimum lot size required and 76.9% of respondents did not believe that there should be a limitation on the number of chickens allowed.

26 Requested Action: Staff requests that the Village Board review and discuss the information provided. Staff offers the following options in order to proceed:. Direct staff to forego preparing an amendment to the Village Code to allow for backyard chickens.. Direct staff to prepare an amendment to the Village Code to allow for backyard chickens. This would include an administrative permitting process that prohibits roosters, limits the number of hens, establishes required setbacks, and includes abutting property owner notification. Attachments: Exhibit - Jurisdiction Summary Exhibit - Parcel Inventory Exhibit - CDC Information Exhibit 4 - Community Survey Results December, 07 Village Board Workshop Minutes

27 Exhibit Municipality Maximum Number of Hens Batavia 8 Prohibitied N/A Countryside 4 Prohibitied N/A Downers Grove 4 Prohibitied N/A Naperville 8 Prohibitied N/A Plainfield 8 Prohibitied N/A St. Charles 6 Prohibitied N/A Warrenville 0 Prohibitied Roosters Lot Size Enclosure Setbacks Permit Zoning Other 0,000 sf minimum Westmont 6 Prohibitied N/A Enclosure and outside fenced Covered inside enclosure area require a 0' setback from and adjacent adjacent any adjacent occuped resident covered outside fenced area structure other than that of the ( sf minimum) must be owner; must also comply with provided accessory structure setbacks Must be kept in a covered outside enclosure or inside a residence or garage; shelter must be architecturally compatible with residence or any accessory structure Entirely confided in a pen, coop, building or other enclosure Pen, coop, building or other enclosure. If this is not fullyenclosed, additional fencing, walls, or landscaping necessary A shelter (6 sf minimum, 6' maximum height) and adjacent outside fenced area ( sf minimum) are required Shelter allowed in rear yard, 0' setback from side lot lines, 5' from rear lot line, and 5' from any neighboring house 50' of a property line without a permit; 7' with permit 0' from any occupied residence other than that of the owner 0' from adjacent occupied residential structure, and must also comply with accessory structure setbacks Must be kept in an enclosure or fenced in area; must screened so as to not 5' from property line; rear yard be visible from any public only street or adjoining lot when viewed from a height of 5' Coop or chicken run Hen coop must be at least 5 sf per hen (50 sf maximum) Backyard Chickens: Neighboring Community Regulations (revised /6/7) 0' from side, ' from rear; listed as only allowed to encroach required rear yard 0' from property line; hen coop allowed in rear yard only Required for all enclosures Required Permit is required only if the structure does not meet 50' setback Required for construction, addition, or modification of any pen, coop, building or other enclosure used for purposes of housing fowl Required for construction of shelter; registration required for hens Not required Not required Permit required for the hen coop (not considered an acessory structure unless larger than 50 sf) Allowed for properties zoned and occupied for single family residential use, or for schools Allowed on any residential lot Parcels improved with singlefamily detached homes All zoning districts Allowed for properties zoned and occupied for single family residential use Allowed for properties zoned and occupied for single family residential use Any residential district Single family properties Electric service shall not be provided by extension cord; chickens only allowed only in the rear yard. Registration also required (no fee) Chickens allowed outside in fenced area when in presence of their owners or keepers; professional predator protection system approved by the community development department shall be installed on any outdoor shelter Requires adjacent property owners concent If pen, coop, or other structure is not fullyenclosed, must be screened to a height of 6' with fence, wall, or landscaping Must be kept in the rear yard Only allowed on property properly zoned and occupied for single family residential use; in rear yard only. Chicken coop not allowed to be located in the home and/or attached garage If hens are allowed to roam outside of hen coop, must have an approved fence; if heating is provided it must be via a listed outdoor electric heater with compliant extension cord or listed fuel burning heater Most communities have language requiring the coop or enclosure be kept clean and sanitary, food must be properly stored in rodent proof containers, and slaugherting of chickens is prohibited. Communities that prohibit the keeping of chickens: Woodridge, Wheaton, Glen Ellyn

28 Exhibit Number of Parcels By Lot Area (sq. ft.)

29 Exhibit HEALTHY FAMILIES AND FLOCKS Live poultry, such as chickens, ducks, geese, and turkeys, often carry harmful germs such as Salmonella. While it usually doesn t make the birds sick, Salmonella can cause serious illness when it is passed to people. HANDWASHING PROTECTS YOU FROM GERMS Always wash your hands with soap and water right after touching live poultry or anything in the area where they live and roam. Adults should supervise handwashing for young children. Use hand sanitizer if soap and water are not readily available. HANDLE BIRDS SAFELY Children younger than 5 years, adults older than 65 years, and people with weakened immune systems should not handle or touch chicks, ducklings, or other live poultry. Do not bring chicks, ducklings and other live poultry to schools, childcare centers, or nursing homes. Do not snuggle or kiss the birds, touch your mouth, or eat or drink around live poultry. SAFELY CLEAN COOPS Clean any equipment used to care for live poultry outside, such as cages or feed or water containers. Set aside a pair of shoes to wear while taking care of poultry and keep those shoes outside of the house. POULTRY BELONG OUTSIDE Do not let live poultry inside the house, especially in kitchens. Do not let live poultry in areas where food or drink is prepared, served, or stored. Have a Backyard Flock? Don t Wing it. Visit for more information CS7478A

30 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page of 6 9//08 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Backyard Flocks, 08 Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Backyard Flocks en Español Case Count Maps Posted July, 08 :00 AM ET Outbreak Advisory Cases 44 States 4 Hospitalizations 0 Deaths Since the last update on June 8, 08, 88 more ill people have been reported. The most recent illness began on June, 08. CDC and multiple states are investigating several multistate outbreaks of Salmonella infections linked to contact with live poultry in backyard flocks. People can get sick with Salmonella infections from touching live poultry or their environment. These birds can be carrying Salmonella bacteria but appear healthy and clean and show no signs of illness. Several different types of Salmonella bacteria have made people sick in this outbreak: Salmonella Seftenberg, Salmonella Montevideo, Salmonella Infantis, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Indiana, and Salmonella Litchfield. As of July, 08, people infected with the outbreak strains of Salmonella have been reported from 44 states.

31 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page of 6 9//08 Illnesses started from February 5, 08 to June, ill people have been hospitalized, and no deaths have been reported. 6% of ill people are children younger than 5 years. Epidemiologic, traceback, and laboratory findings link these outbreaks to contact with live poultry, such as chicks and ducklings, which come from multiple hatcheries. In interviews, 00 (7%) of 8 ill people with information available reported contact with chicks or ducklings in the week before their illness started. People reported obtaining chicks and ducklings from several sources, including feed supply stores, websites, hatcheries, and from relatives. WGS analysis to identify antibiotic resistance was performed for 8 isolates from ill people in this outbreak. Twenty-two isolates from ill people contained genes expected to cause resistance or decreased susceptibility to all or some of the following antibiotics: ampicillin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, and fosfomycin. Ninety-six isolates did not identify predicted resistance. Testing of 5 outbreak isolates using standard antibiotic susceptibility testing by CDC s National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) laboratory confirmed these results. Some infections may be difficult to treat with commonly recommended antibiotics, and may require another kind of antibiotic. This investigation is ongoing, and CDC will provide updates when more information is available. Advice to Mail-Order Hatcheries Advice to Feed Stores that Sell or Display Live Poultry

32 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page of 6 9//08 Tips to Stay Healthy With a Backyard Flock Always wash hands thoroughly with soap and water right after touching live poultry or anything in their environment. Don t let children younger than 5 years handle or touch live poultry without adult supervision. Set aside a pair of shoes to wear while taking care of your birds and keep the shoes outside of your home. Read more about ways to stay healthy with backyard flocks. Read live poultry Q&A.

33 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page 4 of 6 9//08 Seventy outbreaks of Salmonella infections have been linked to contact with backyard flocks since 000 [PDF 887 KB].

34 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page 5 of 6 9//08 CLICK TO VIEW CASE COUNT MAPS More Information CDC Feature: Keeping Backyard Poultry CDC Poster: Healthy Families and Flocks CDC Poster: Don t Play Chicken with Your Health Healthy Pets Healthy People Other Outbreaks Linked to Backyard Flocks CDC Salmonella webpage [PDF 6 KB] [PDF 887 KB] Get Updates To receive updates about this page, enter your address:

35 Multistate Outbreaks of Salmonella Infections Linked to Contact with Live Poultry in Bac... Page 6 of 6 9//08 What's this? ( Submit Related Links Multistate Foodborne Outbreaks Gastrointestinal (Enteric) Diseases from Animals Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases Foodborne Illness A-Z Estimates of Foodborne Illness Foodsafety.gov ( Report a Foodborne Illness U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ( USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service ( Follow Salmonella RSS ( File Formats Help: How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site? ( ( Page last reviewed: June 8, 08 Page last updated: July 0, 08 Content source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) (/ncezid/index.html) Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED) (/ncezid/dfwed/index.html)

36 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page of 7 9//08 Backyard Poultry Overview Diseases Healthy People Healthy Poultry FAQs Resources Healthy Poultry In this section Preparing for your backyard poultry Biosecurity: The Key To Keeping Your Poultry Healthy Choosing and introducing poultry Housing backyard poultry Monitor your pet s health Importing poultry into the United States Preparing for your backyard poultry

37 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page of 7 9//08 Group of baby chicks. Check your state, local, and property laws before selecting or buying baby chicks, adult poultry (hens, roosters), or waterfowl. Many cities have rules against owning roosters because they violate noise ordinances with their loud crowing. Also, hens will lay eggs without a rooster. Find out if there is a local veterinarian who has experience with poultry to help you keep your poultry healthy. Learn what types of poultry are suitable for your family. Certain types of poultry, like young chicks, ducklings, goslings, and turkey poults, might not be suitable for young children or people with weak immune systems who are living in the household. Though most poultry are quite docile, some breeds of poultry are more aggressive and may be more likely to inflict bite or scratch wounds. Research and learn how to properly care for your poultry before you buy them. Ask your veterinarian or local cooperative extension agent about the proper food, care, and enclosure or environment that is best for the poultry you are selecting. Build an enclosure for your poultry outside your home. Backyard poultry need a sturdy environment that is easy to clean and that will protect them from disease vectors such as insects and rodents, and provide shelter from the weather and predators. Set up an area outdoors to clean and disinfect all equipment used to care for the poultry and clean their enclosure. This will help you avoid having to clean any items indoors, where the germs could contaminate your living space.

38 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page of 7 9//08 Be aware that poultry can shed Salmonella, Campylobacter, E. coli, avian influenza, and other germs in their droppings. Plan to wear gloves when cleaning bird cages and poultry houses, and wash your hands and equipment thoroughly with soap and water after you have any contact with the poultry or their environment. Top of Page Biosecurity: The Key To Keeping Your Poultry Healthy Biosecurity ( is the key to keeping your poultry healthy. It is what you do to reduce the chances of diseases being carried to your poultry yard or your poultry by people, animals, equipment, or vehicles, either accidentally or on purpose. By practicing biosecurity, you can help reduce the chances of your poultry being exposed to poultry diseases such as avian influenza or virulent Newcastle disease. The following steps can help you keep your poultry healthy: Keep your distance Isolate your birds from visitors and other birds. Keep it clean Prevent germs from spreading by cleaning shoes, tools and equipment. Don t haul disease home Also clean vehicles and cages. Don t borrow disease from your neighbor Avoid sharing tools and equipment with neighbors. Know the warning signs of infectious bird diseases Watch for early signs to prevent the spread of disease Report sick birds Report unusual signs of disease or unexpected deaths. Top of Page Choosing and introducing poultry Pick poultry that are bright, alert, and active. Poultry should have smooth, sleek, and soft feathers that are free of debris or droppings. Poultry who seem depressed, aren t moving around very much, or look dirty may be ill. Poultry that appear healthy and clean can still spread harmful germs that can make people sick. When bringing new poultry to an existing flock be sure to keep them separated for at least 0 days before they are introduced to your other poultry. This will help prevent the new poultry from passing disease to your flock. Make sure to clean and disinfect your hands, shoes and clothing, and equipment when working between the two groups of poultry during this period of separation. For example, you can dedicate separate pairs of gloves, coveralls, and boots to each group, and you should wash your hands or at least use alcohol-based hand sanitizer when you go between the two groups. Always take care of your existing flock before caring for your new poultry.

39 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page 4 of 7 9//08 Contact your veterinarian or local extension agent if you notice any signs of illness in your poultry. Sick poultry can: Be less active than normal Eat or drink less than normal Have ruffled feathers, discharge from the eyes or nose, difficulty breathing, or runny diarrhea Produce fewer eggs than normal. Produce discolored, irregular, or misshapen eggs Die unexpectedly of no apparent cause Your veterinarian or local extension agent can work with you to determine the cause of the illness and help ensure that it does not spread to the rest of the poultry. Top of Page Housing backyard poultry A woman stands near her chicken coop. Do not allow poultry or waterfowl inside your home for any reason. Provide your backyard poultry with a safe, sturdy environment outdoors, with housing areas and feeders/waterers that can be easily cleaned and disinfected. Poultry can be kept warm outdoors in the winter in a draft-free shelter or by using a safe heating source.

40 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page 5 of 7 9//08 Do not house live baby poultry in areas where food or drink is prepared, served, or stored, such as kitchens or outdoor patios. Bleach or another disinfectant can be used to clean and disinfect surfaces that have come in contact with poultry. When using disinfectants, make sure to follow the label instructions for diluting the disinfectant and for leaving it on surfaces for the proper contact time before wiping or rinsing it off. Clean poultry enclosures or cages with bottled dish soap and a commercial disinfectant dedicated to this purpose. Go outside to clean any equipment or materials associated with raising or caring for live poultry, such as cages or feed or water containers. Do not clean these items inside the house. This could bring harmful germs into your home. First remove debris (manure, broken egg material, droppings, dirt) by wiping the equipment with a sponge or brush soaked in warm water and dish soap. Once most of the debris is removed and the surface is generally clean, then apply the disinfectant, diluted properly according to label directions. Most disinfectants only work on clean surfaces and don t work if they are applied directly to a dirty surface. Leave the disinfectant on the surface for the proper contact time listed on the disinfectant label (usually anywhere from 0 seconds to 0 minutes), then rinse and allow the surface to dry before reuse. Set aside a pair of shoes to wear while taking care of poultry and keep those shoes outside of the house. Top of Page Monitor your pet s health

41 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page 6 of 7 9//08 A veterinarian looks closely at chicks for signs of illness. Work closely with a veterinarian or local extension agent who has experience with poultry for routine evaluation and care to keep your flock healthy and prevent infectious diseases. If you aren t sure if your veterinarian treats poultry, call ahead to the clinic to ask. If they do not see poultry, they can refer you to a qualified veterinarian in your area that does. Keep coops and enclosures clean to prevent the build-up of animal droppings, which could attract insects, rodents, and wildlife carrying disease agents. When you clean droppings and cages, use disposable gloves, do not pick up droppings with your bare hands, and make sure to wash your hands thoroughly afterwards. If your poultry become sick or die soon after purchase, inform the feed store or hatchery. Consider waiting at least 0 days before replacing the poultry, and contact your veterinarian or local cooperative extension agent to investigate the cause of death. Do not reuse the enclosure until it has been properly cleaned and disinfected. A healthy bird can still spread germs to people and other animals. If you become sick shortly after buying or adopting a bird, tell your health care provider about your new animal and other animals that live in your household. Top of Page Importing poultry into the United States

42 Backyard Poultry Healthy Pets, Healthy People CDC Page 7 of 7 9//08 USDA regulates the importation of poultry and poultry hatching eggs. Because avian influenza can cause serious illness and even death in poultry, USDA restricts the importation of poultry and poultry hatching eggs from countries where avian influenza has been reported. People interested in importing poultry or poultry hatching eggs should visit the USDA Live Animal Importation website ( Top of Page File Formats Help: How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site? ( ( ( Page last reviewed: April 0, 04 Page last updated: June 6, 08 Content source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ( National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID) (/ncezid/dw-index.html)

43 9//08 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey Exhibit 4 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey,07 responses Should the Village revise its zoning code to allow for backyard chickens?,07 responses 78.% No Yes, with restrictions Yes, with notice to neighbors 0.8% 0.9% If a backyard chicken permit is required, what level of review should an application have?,07 responses 8.7% 9.4% An application only (similar to a licensing process) Staff level review with set requirements Public notice and public hearing which includes a public discussion with the Village Board and providing notice to the public so interested parties can attend. /9

44 9//08 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey If your neighbor wanted to have chickens, would you want to be noti ed?,07 responses 8.5% Yes No 7.5% Related to household lot sizes, if chickens were to be allowed should there be a minimum lot size required in order to have them?,06 responses 80.6% No Yes, at least a,500 sq ft. lot size Yes, between 5,000 9,000 square feet lot size Yes, at least 0,000 or more square feet Yes, at least 0,0000 or more square feet Yes, at least a,5000 sq ft. Village code allows for accessory structures, which is what a chicken enclosure would be considered. How far from the rear and side property lines should the enclosures be required to be?,07 responses /9

45 9//08 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey.% 0 Feet 5 Feet 0 Feet 8.% Should there be a limit on the number of chickens, and what should that be?,07 responses 76.9%.8% No Limit Yes, four or less No more than chicken pe 6 None / If the Village were to allow backyard chickens, what would be your primary concerns, if any?,07 responses 48 (4.5%) 95 (%) 69 (.%) 5 (0.%) 4 (0.%) 4 (0.%) (0.%) (0 %),49 (80.6%) /9

46 9//08 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey (0.%) (0.%) (0.%) 4/9

47 9//08 Village of Lisle Backyard Chicken Survey 75 (.5%) 0,000,000, /9

48 MINUTES VILLAGE OF LISLE BOARD OF TRUSTEES WORKSHOP MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER, 07 Call to Order, Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance Mayor Pecak called to order a workshop meeting of the Village of Lisle Board of Trustees at 7: 00 p. m. on Monday, December, 07 in the Village Hall Board Room, 95 Burlington Avenue, Lisle, Illinois 605. The following minutes constitute a summary of the events and discussions that transpired during the subject meeting, and do not purport to be a transcript of such. Where transcripts exist, they are available for inspection under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act. Present: Mayor Pecak; Trustees Boyle, Carballo, Cawiezel, Dixit, Hasse, and Mandel Absent: None Also Present: Village Manager Ertmoed, Assistant Village Manager Knight, Police Chief Anderson, Acting Community & Economic Development Director Herman, Staff Engineer Stormwater Administrator Sucoe, Economic Development Coordinator Kelly, Village Clerk Brondyke and Deputy Clerk Arnold Mayor Pecak led the Pledge of Allegiance.. Discussion with Lisle Eyes to the Skies Festival Committee / Special Event Funding Village Manager Ertmoed remarked that this conversation stems from a mid - year budget review and the desire to look at contributions to the Eyes to the Skies ( ETTS). Manager Ertmoed stated the Board has a concern looking at the status of the hotel/ motel fund and the event' s financial needs. Roger Leone, Chairman ETTS, stated he is here to answer questions the Board may have and come to a compromise where the Village would be able to continue funding. Mr. Leone stated the Board should have received in their packet a factual handout provided from the committee about the festival, where the money goes, and why it' s important for Lisle. Dennis Webb, Sponsorship Chairman, remarked that by the event being called the Lisle ETTS festival it gives the Village positive recall and puts us on the map, he also spoke on how this event brings the community together. Mayor Pecak commented on the investment made in the stage by the Park District and questioned if the committee is considering having other events that will require funding. Mr. Leone stated the stage was redeveloped as a community effort for other concerts, events and venues. Mr. Webb stated they have no intention other than ETTS. Mayor Pecak asked what funding the festival needs on an annual basis. Mr. Leone stated that they consider the funding from the Village vital because festival profits go to Lisle charities and the people they serve in Lisle. Mr. Leone spoke on the advertising the Village gets from the festival. Mayor Pecak commented on the budget and how when the fund is overspent the needed excess comes from the general fund. Mr. Leone remarked that incremental costs increased due increased security to protect the public.

49 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page Trustee Cawiezel stated that the festival is phenomenal and adds value to the Village. Trustee Cawiezel stated for of the last 6 years the hotel / motel fund has experienced adding that the community needs to be informed about the budget. deficit spending Trustee Cawiezel pointed out that an application has to be filled out by other events seeking funds; the application includes submittal of a budget and other expenses, it is then reviewed by the Board. She stated that historically ETTS has not had to submit this. She questioned if the committee would be offended if they too were asked to follow the procedure that others must. Mr. Webb stated funds were petitioned for, but there may not have been formal documents. Trustee Cawiezel stated it would be helpful, and provide clarity, to have all events be on a level playing field. Mr. Webb stated that they can submit their budget, but there are " what ifs and assumptions". Mr. Webb pointed out that they consider the Village a sponsor of the event and it gives the Village an excellent marketing tool. Trustee Mandel remarked that he has worked at the festival and when you see the number of people that come in it is amazing, it is a quality, well run, volunteer, family event that everyone can enjoy. Trustee Mandel commented on the extended financial impact of the festival and how even after it is over people come back to visit our restaurants and hotels. Trustee Mandel stated it is important that the Village maintain their sponsorship and continue to invest. Trustee Mandel commented on fireworks and how difficult and expensive it would be for the Village to put on its own display. Trustee Boyle stated he echoes Trustee Mandel' s comments, he then commented on the seed money that the Village had given, and was paid back, in the past; he stated the Board needs to decide where the Village should continue to sponsor. Trustee Hasse stated that looking at it strictly from an accounting perspective it concerns her to look at the fund and see it operating at a deficit. Trustee Hasse also asked that financial reports be provided to the Village, so the Village may take a look and see what they can realistically fund. Trustee Dixit stated that everyone on the Board is an advocate of the ETTS festival and what a safe and fantastic family event it is, but the Board needs to look at the numbers and decide what we can afford to do. Mr. Webb remarked that he understands that the Village has a fiduciary responsibility, adding as they have one to put back as much as they can to the community. Mr. Webb spoke on the return on investment from the festival. Trustee Mandel stated the Village needs to look at the top line and be strategic and exercise fiscal responsibility. Mr. Leone commended the Lisle Police Department, Fire District and Public Works for all the hard work they perform to keep everyone safe. Val Valosny, Western Springs, remarked that he has been a volunteer at the festival since 99 and wanted to add that it is not just Lisle residents who volunteer, he works at the balloon field and most of his volunteers are not residents. Darryl Lamen, Lisle, inquired why the Mayor asked about the usage of the stage and what other money is spent from the hotel / motel tax fund that is causing the deficit. Mayor Pecak explained that he asked about the stage because ETTS donated money towards it and questioned what the long term plans were and if they were considering operating more festivals. Manager Ertmoed explained that 80% of the fund goes towards the operation of the Convention and Visitors Bureau

50 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page and the remaining 0% goes towards funding restaurant grants, seasonal decorations, seasonal banners, ETTS, Lights of Lisle, French Market and other special events throughout the year. Trustee Cawiezel added that of that 0%, 0% has gone to ETTS Warrenville Road Ryan Homes Concept Review Acting Director Herman stated Ryan Homes is looking for input regarding a concept plan for a townhome development located off Warrenville Road between it and Mr. Herman reviewed the zoning of the site and added that they have received feedback from the PZC as well. Scott Shelton & Andrew Mouw, Ryan Homes, presented their plan for 69 townhome units, consisting of two and three story units. Mr. Shelton stated that of the 6 acres, 9 will be open space. He stated they expect the buyer to be a first time buyer or a step- up buyer and homes will be priced in the mid $ 00K. Mr. Shelton discussed cross sections of the area and how they will be accommodating for the fall in the property. Mr. Shelton asked to hear the feedback of the Board as it will help them with their next steps. Trustee Hasse stated that per the land use plan the property was to be single family, she questions why it changed to multi -family. Mr. Herman explained that it occurred in 998 when the Sunbridge assisted living development had been approved. Trustee Hasse pointed out that members of the PZC stated the property was too dense, she inquired if anything changed since then. Mr. Shelton stated they did not alter the density. Trustee Hasse also questioned if they had spoken to neighboring property owners. Mr. Shelton stated no, they have not, but will if this is a use the Board will support. Mayor Pecak stated there are no recreation areas on the site and the nearest park is across Warrenville Road, he asked them to address that. Mr. Shelton stated that they do not have any proposed amenities, but there is open space and sidewalk. Trustee Boyle pointed out that the density number includes that of the wetlands, he remarked that he is disappointed that the wetland have not been addressed and how they are currently used as a dumping ground and four -wheeler area, they will need to be improved. Mr. Shelton stated that it will be part of the development. Ms. Sucoe added that DuPage County has open violations against the property and Ryan has meet with them regarding the issues. Trustees Cawiezel, Mandel, Dixit and Hasse all agreed that they are not in support of the high density and monotony development and that by including the wetlands it distorts the density. Mr. Shelton inquired if the density was reduced would the concept still be acceptable use. Trustee Hasse stated she would prefer single-family Ohio Street Kindi Academy Concept Review Acting Director Herman stated the Village' s zoning code prohibits schools in the industrial district and in order for Kindi Academy to be able to operate out of 97 Ohio Street the Board would have to approve a zoning code text amendment to allow them as a special use. Russ Whitaker, attorney for Kindi Academy, remarked that Kindi Academy has been operating in Lisle for seven years, they are currently on Westview Lane ( Meadows Center). He pointed out that the building is slated for demolition and a new school will be built in its place. Mr. Whitaker stated they have been actively seeking a new home and would like to remain in Lisle, but options are

51 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page 4 limited. Mr. Whitaker stated that the text amendment that they would seek is to permit a school in the industrial district as a special use. Mr. Whitaker described the area and the building Kindi would be occupying. Mr. Whitaker added that the Lisle Park District, which operates a pre- school, is two lots from the property, adding that it is allowed because it is a secondary use to the recreation / offices in the building. Trustee Hasse stated it is her understanding that Kindi was looking at Tate Woods or Schiesher for use once they were vacated; she questioned if Ohio Street would be a permanent home for Kindi or would they still be interested in the other schools. Mr. Whitaker stated Ohio Street would be a permanent address. Mayor Pecak asked what ages are taught at the school. Mr. Whitaker stated 5 months through 8th grade, he then described how the school is broken down. Trustee Mandel asked if they are purchasing or leasing the building. Mr. Whitaker stated leasing. Trustee Cawiezel asked if they have spoken with the School District. Mr. Whitaker stated it is his understanding from Kindi that this is the only viable location in Lisle and it is either this or one in Lombard and does not know what, if any, communications have occurred with the school district. Mayor Pecak pointed out that the schools would not be vacated for some time. Mayor Pecak stated his concern is the impact the school will have on the other tenants of the industrial park, such as increased traffic and school zone restrictions. Trustee Cawiezel inquired if they are exempt from real estate tax. Mr. Whitaker explained that because it is a lease, it would not exempt them, but they have not started contract negotiations with the owner. Mayor Pecak asked if they have open space needs due to being a school. Mr. Whitaker stated that is an issue that has yet to be addressed, but there are proximate areas that allow for outdoor opportunity. Mr. Whitaker stated they are looking for feedback this evening, because if this is not something the board would entertain, they would not move forward. Mayor Pecak stated he has a concern for the neighboring properties that would then be effected on who they may lease to. Mr. Whitaker remarked that guns, alcohol and pornography are the limits on what may be located near a school and those are already prohibited in the district. Adding that because there is already a pre- school in the industrial park, as well as Lisle High School located adjacent, they are already in place and effecting them. Trustee Boyle agreed the restraints are already in place. Trustee Dixit remarked that she would like to know more about the school and its needs, such as outdoor area and to know that the students will be in a safe area. Mr. Whitaker pointed out that the Park District has similar proximity to other industrial uses within the park. 5. Backyard Chickens Text Amendment Mr. Herman stated that in the packet were regulations and applications from other municipalities in the area that allow chickens and that the Henny' s are present if the Board has any questions. Mr. Herman remarked that he is looking for direction if the Board is comfortable with a code amendment to allow for the keeping of chickens and what kind of regulations they would like.

52 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page 5 Trustee Mandel questioned if staff knew why some towns strictly prohibit chickens. Mr. Herman stated that he focused on areas that allow chickens and for those that do not allow, it could be that the subject has just not been brought up or they have not been allowed for decades. Trustee Cawiezel remarked that she had an opportunity to talk to chicken owners, from other towns and to them, to not allow hens was laughable and they were able to answer all her questions and concerns she had. Trustee Cawiezel does not think that it is unreasonable to allow for a small number of fowl. Trustee Hasse questioned if people would educate themselves to properly care for chickens, adding that she has a concern about disease from feces. Ms. Henny spoke on friends of theirs who have chicken and how they would be willing to mentor them on proper hen care. Trustee Dixit added that is her concern as well, that not everyone will do the research and work needed that goes into it. Trustee Dixit questioned how the Village will monitor the coops to ensure the chickens are safe. Ms. Henny remarked that the Village recently passed a bee -keeping ordinance, she asked how is the Village going to monitor those who have registered. Ms. Henny stated they are not against obtaining a permit, adding that it is a deterrent to those who are not committed to the best interest of the chickens. Trustee Hasse questioned if staff inquired how many permits have been issued in other towns. Mr. Herman stated he did ask, but did not have that information with him, adding that the Village had one other resident inquire about chickens. Mayor Pecak questioned if the Village is limited due to being non -home rule as well if the Village did consider a lot size requirement how many homes it would disqualify. Trustee Boyle remarked that lot size would have to be addressed. Trustee Cawiezel stated a set -back would be more important. Mayor Pecak stated that there are many neighborhoods in Lisle that would not be able to support the requirements of other towns, adding that most lots are under 0K square feet and would not be able to meet the setback requirement either. Mr. Herman stated Warrenville is the only town with a lot requirement. Trustee Cawiezel stated she supports people with chickens and does not think that there will be too many people wanting them. Mayor Pecak asked if they have encountered any other residents that want to raise chickens. Ms. Henny stated she did have people respond to the Nextdoor post stating they too would want chickens and some were located in Green Trails, adding that they also had people that were against chickens from the same area. Mayor Pecak asked if this would be better to do as a variance. Acting Director Herman stated that this section of code is under Police regulations, not zoning, where there is an established process, he stated that he does not believe that there is a mechanism for us to do this as a variance. Barb Bielat, remarked that she lives in Oak Hill South and has a neighbor who has chickens and they are not housed in a well maintained coop. She then remarked on the additional scat in her yard that she feel is the fault of the chickens attracting animals. Trustee Hasse asked what the Village can do about people who are not maintaining their coops or properly caring for their chickens. Chief Anderson stated they just need someone to make a report

53 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page 6 to start an investigation, similar to someone having too many dogs or improperly caring for them. He added that they get animal complaints often and staff is well versed in dealing with them. Trustee Mandel stated that he feels that there should be a minimum lot size and agreed, often people have the best intentions and if they are not taken care of, they effect the entire neighborhood. Ms. Bielat added that this has really only been on Nextdoor. com and no other means of communication, and if other residents knew that this was so close to a decision more would have commented. Trustee Dixit stated that they need to do more research before they can make an informed decision. Trustee Dixit also commented on the number of people who had gotten sick from chicken coops in the United States. Trustee Dixit agreed lot size and setbacks are crucial. Mayor Pecak asked if there is a lot size inventory available to better understand how many people could potentially be affected by the text amendment. Mr. Herman stated yes, he has information on lot size. Mayor Pecak asked that the information be put on the Village' s website to get their opinion and to then have another workshop on the topic once more research may be provided. 6. Overhead Sewer & Backflow Prevention Cost -Sharing Program Manager Ertmoed remarked that this is follow- up from the mid -year budget review and revitalized interest in the program since the October flooding event. Stormwater Manager Sucoe stated she now has residents interested in the program and then remarked on the history of the program and how back in 996 there was $ 40K budgeted. She stated in 996 it was $ 000, in combination with a DuPage County rebate, which was the primary rebate. Ms. Sucoe stated that currently $ 5K is budgeted and it comes out of the sewer fund. She pointed out that not all the residents who will by applying for the funds pay into the sewer fund because they are on IAW. Ms. Sucoe then remarked on staff recommendations on updating the program as outlined in the packet. She added that a portion was inadvertently lost in the revisions and that any excess over the budgeted amount would come out of the general fund. Trustee Boyle inquired if any of the cost could be picked up by insurance. Ms. Sucoe stated that there is a rider needed to get backflow coverage, but is not sure if they would cover any of the initial costs. Trustee Boyle asked that be explored thinking that they would incentivize their own customers. Trustee Hasse asked how the funds would be handled this year. Ms. Sucoe stated she would payout what is budgeted and however many additional residents there are, this year, she would request a budget transfer and then adjust the budget next year for however many residents that did not apply this fiscal year. Ms. Sucoe added that she spoke with her predecessor, MaryLou Kalsted and she could not recall this kind interest in the program during her tenure. Mayor Pecak remarked that funds not used from years past have gone back into the general fund, adding that the general fund then benefitted from past nonuse. Trustee Cawiezel asked why the Village would subsidize this particular cost / expense. Ms. Sucoe stated the theory is that the Village has not retrofitted all sanitary sewer lines in our system and therefor did not keep all stormwater out of the public system. Trustee Cawiezel confirmed that part of the cause is due to Village infrastructure. Ms. Sucoe stated a percentage of stormwater is getting

54 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page 7 into the sanitary system via the public lines. Ms. Sucoe stated the Village does televise, line and continues maintenance, but there is a cycle and a certain amount budgeted for each year. Trustee Hasse suggested moving forward with what has been suggested. Ms. Sucoe added that she believes a certain percentage of the residents will wait and apply for the funds if there is to be a higher rebate. Ms. Sucoe stated she will keep the amount at $ provide any coverage. 000 and will investigate if insurance companies Trustee Cawiezel stated she does not want some people to get $ 000 and others who decide to wait a few months later to get more. Trustee Cawiezel stated she would increase the amount to K. Trustee Mandel remarked that he feels it is okay if there are two separate amounts, because it is up to the homeowner; if they want the funds now, and reduce the likelihood of this happening again, versus gambling and getting more if it is in the budget. He stated keep the program in place as it is now and then consider the increase with next year' s budget. 7. Lisle -Naperville Boundary Agreement Amendment Mr. Herman stated staff has been in discussions with the City of Naperville over a potential adjustment to the boundary line. He stated that there is a property located at the northwest corner of Karns and Ridgeland, that is unincorporated, then described the current boundary. Mr. Herman explained that someone is interested in building a home on a vacant lot on the Naperville side, however Lisle utilities are closer, and to extend Naperville lines is cost prohibitive as well challenging. Mr. Herman stated that he is seeking approval to formally discuss this boundary line, as well as if the Village would like to see the change to accommodate the single lot or all five lots on the west side of Karns. Trustee Hasse inquired if Naperville was agreeable to turning the property over to Lisle. Mr. Herman stated that this was informally discussed at an October Naperville board meeting, and in general Naperville was comfortable, they were authorized to reach out to us. Mayor Pecak asked if there is a significate elevation difference that makes it prohibitive for Naperville to extend utilities. Acting Director Herman remarked that based on the location of the Naperville sanitary sewer is difficult because the topography is not favorable. Mayor Pecak asked that staff explore pursuing as much of the area as they can while the opportunity to amend the boundary agreement is available. Trustee Hasse asked if Naperville would want anything in return, adding that she is unfamiliar with the process. Acting Director Herman commented on the boundary amendment in 005 and how at the time Naperville just gave Lisle the properties, adding that at other times it has been a swap situation. 8. Public Comment 9. Village Board / Village Staff Comments

55 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting December, 07 Page 8 Manager Ertmoed formally introduced and welcomed Assistant Village Manager Jack Knight and explained what his duties will entail. Mr. Knight stated he looks forward to working with staff and the Board. 0. Adjournment Trustee Boyle moved to adjourn. Trustee Hasse seconded the motion. AYES APPROVED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. The December, 07 Village Board workshop meeting adjourned at 9: 7 p. m. Respectfully Submitted, Aium ClA,t,aw- Karen Arnold Recording Secretary

56 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting - December, 07 Page 9 The minutes of the December, 07 Village of Lisle Workshop Meeting were passed and approved 4?Z Trust Boyle Trustee Carball Trustee riec-e cre- e_. 5T Trustee Dixit Trustee Hasse Trustee Mandel

57 Village of Lisle Board Workshop Agenda Item September 7, 08 Agenda Item: Prepared By: Discussion Regarding Maintenance of Village Rights-of-Way Michael Smetana, AICP, Development Services Director Date: September, 08 Discussion: Village standards related to grass and weed control are set forth in Title 8, Chapter 4, of the Village Code. These standards apply to private property and do not require property owners to maintain parkways, which are generally located within Village rights-of-way. As a result, all parkway maintenance issues related to grass, weeds, and other vegetation overgrowth must be abated by the Public Works Department. During the growing season, this can represent a substantial amount of work that would distract from other work that is necessary to properly maintain the Village s infrastructure. The Village Attorney has advised staff that the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS 5/-60-) establishes the Village s authority to define, abate, and prevent nuisances. Under the authority afforded to the Village by the statute, staff is proposing an amendment to the Village of Lisle Village Code establishing parkway maintenance requirements for property owners. Establishing these requirements will clearly define the responsibilities of the property owner while allowing the Public Works Department to focus efforts on other operational matters. This will also assist the Village in ensuring compliance with property maintenance standards throughout the Village, including addressing concerns over property maintenance along Ogden Avenue. Further, the Village will be able to leverage the Community Service Officer unit in responding to and addressing concerns. Requiring property owners to maintain the parkway is practiced in the Village of Bolingbrook and Village of Addison. Requested Action: Staff is requesting Village Board discussion regarding parkway maintenance responsibility and authorization to prepare an amendment to the Village of Lisle Village Code establishing parkway maintenance requirements for property owners.

58 Village of Lisle Workshop Agenda Item September 7, 08 Agenda Item: Village Board Agenda and Procedural Updates Date: September, 08 Prepared by: Jack Knight, Assistant Village Manager Discussion: The Village periodically reviews its procedures to ensure that they reflect best practice, take into account operational needs, and allow for the efficient conduct of Village business. Recently, the Village Manager s Office, Deputy Village Clerk, and Village Attorney reviewed the creation of the Village Board agenda and related procedures relating to the conduct of Village Board meetings. The review included the Village Board agenda outline, the agenda creation process, and steps taken to carry out the business of the Village Board during the meeting. Components of the agenda were vetted for applicability and effectiveness while weighing them against the goals of efficiently conducting the business of the Village Board with an emphasis on transparency, clarity and inclusiveness of both Village Board members and members of the public in the proceedings of the meeting. Proposed refinements to the Village Board agenda are reflected on the attached draft agenda (Exhibit ). Overall, changes to the agenda seek to streamline the conduct of the meeting, add clarity regarding the content of the legislative items and meeting procedures, make clear how the public is invited to participate in the meeting, and establish guidelines on how that participation is to occur. Village staff are also currently engaged in negotiations with a vendor of legislative management software to improve on the efficiency of producing a Village Board agenda, which is anticipated to further contribute to this updating process. Village staff, along with the Village Attorney, also reviewed rules pertaining to the participation of the public in Village Board meetings and have drafted the attached memorandum containing best practices for public participation (Exhibit ). The proposed updates include specifications regarding comment duration, rules of conduct, and procedures for submitting correspondence to the Village Board. Rules were updated with the intent of making the orderly conduct of public input as accessible as possible for those seeking to participate. The update to these rules are further enhanced by reordering the sequence of the Village Board agenda to provide for public comment earlier in the meeting s proceedings. Summaries of both the Village Board agenda and procedural updates appear on the following charts.

59 Update Detail Reformatted to Aid Agenda Preparation Previous Format Resulted in Additional Wordprocessing steps Resequencing/Consolidation of Agenda Sections Removed Duplicative/Underused Sections; Ex: Clerk's Welcome Statement Welcome Statement Welcome Statement and Instructions for Public Comment Added to the Top of the Agenda 4 Meeting Announcements Removed Meeting Dates/Times will Display on Cable Channels in Addition to Appearing on Website, Annual Public Meeting Notice, Village E- Newsletter 5 Retitled Omnibus Vote Agenda Consent Agenda Retitled to Provide More Clarity Regarding this Section 6 Explanation Summaries Added to Introductory Paragraph and Consent Agenda Sections Summary of Village Board Agenda Updates Instructions for Public Comment Now Appear in Introductory Paragraph, Explanation for Consent Agenda Appears in that Section Along with Brief Synopsis of Each of the Items Appearing in the Section Summary of Village Board Procedural Updates Update Detail Eliminate Intro Music Verbal announcement made one minute prior to beginning, Mayor to call meeting to order. Streamlined Roll Call Roll Call to Include Only Village Board Members; Village Attorney and Staff Not to be Included Eliminate Clerk Announcements Agenda Instead has Written Welcoming Statement Along With Instructions for Public Comment. Additional Comment Instruction/Moderation Provided by Mayor 4 Eliminate Meeting Announcements Announcements to Appear on Cable, Website, E- Newsletter 5 Revised Agenda Outline Draft Example Provided as Exhibit 6 Updated Public Comment Procedures Draft amendment to the Village Code provided as Exhibit 7 Elected Official and Staff Reports Consolidated Continues to Provide Same Opportunity to Provide Comments; Consolidates Section Additionally, staff is proposing that Village Board Workshops be renamed to Committee of the Whole and that they be scheduled to occur after the Regular Meeting. Advantages to this arrangement include taking advantage of an already existing meeting date, decreased costs associated with video production and room set up, as well as a reduction in the number of meetings held per month. Attachments: Exhibit Proposed Draft Agenda Exhibit Memorandum Regarding Proposed Rules for Public Participation Action Requested: Staff is requesting the Village Board discussion and direction regarding these proposed updates to the Village Board agenda and meeting procedures.

60 Village of Lisle 95 Burlington Avenue Lisle, IL 605 Regular Village Board Meeting Monday, October, 08 7:00PM Village Board Room, Lisle Village Hall, 95 Burlington Avenue AGENDA Visitors are welcome to all public meetings of the Village Board. Anyone wishing to provide comment may do so during the PUBLIC COMMENT portion of the agenda. When possible, it is requested that one spokesperson be appointed to represent the views of a group. When recognized to speak, individuals are asked to step to the podium, state their name and state the purpose of their commentary prior to providing a statement. Comments should be limited to five minutes per person. I. CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL II. III. IV. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPOINTMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS & PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC HEARING V. PUBLIC COMMENT VI. VII. VIII. IX. MEETING MINUTES VOUCHER LIST CONSENT AGENDA All items on the Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Village Board and will be acted on as a group. These items will not be separately discussed unless a Village Board member so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered during the New & Unfinished portion of the agenda. A summary explanation of each item is provided below the item to assist in the understanding of its purpose. NEW & UNFINISHED OTHER BUSINESS X. OFFICIALS AND STAFF REPORTS XI. XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION ADJOURNMENT The Village of Lisle will make all public meetings accessible to persons with disabilities. Any person needing a reasonable accommodation to participate in a meeting should contact ADA Coordinator, Jack Knight at (60) (Voice) or (TDD) at least 4 hours in advance of the scheduled meeting so that proper arrangements can be made. villageoflisle.org (60) Fax (60) 7-404