RESEARCH PROJECT. Retina and Vitreous Service, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem-Israel
|
|
- Steven Copeland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RESEARCH PROJECT IOL CALCULATION FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC EYES, COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PUBLISHED METHODS. HADASSAH EIN KEREN HOSPITAL, JERUSALEM, ISRAEL, 2014 AUTHOR: Carlos Idrobo MD, Retina and Vitreous Service, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem-Israel SCIENTIFIC DIRECTOR: Dr Edward Averbukh. Retina and Vitreous Service, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem-Israel STATISTIC DIRECTOR Dr. Clara López de Mesa. Scientific Research Director, Barraquer Institute of America, Bogotá - Colombia 1
2 RESUMEN: OBJETIVO Comparar la precisión de varios métodos propuestos para mejorar el càlculo del lente intraocular en pacientes altamente miopes (mayor a 25 mm). LUGAR: Hospital Hadassah Ein Keren, Jerusalém Israel MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda de todos los casos de cirugía de catarata en pacientes con longitudes axiles de 25 a 30 mm en los cuales se calculó el lente intraocular mediante biometría óptica (IOL Master) usando la fórmula SRK/T, estos pacientes fueron operados de facoemulsificación y colocación de lente intraocular IQ SN60WF. Se realizó un cálculo regresivo del poder del lente intraocular mediante las fórmulas : SRK/T con constante optimizada (119.0), SRK/T con 3 constantes personalizadas de acuerdo a la queratometría, fórmula T2, fórmula T2 con constante optimizada (119.0) y fórmula Holladay 1 con factor del cirujano optimizado (1,84). Estos resultados se compararon entre sí buscando los métodos más precisos RESULTADOS: Se obtuvieron 55 casos correspondientes a 38 pacientes en los que el método más preciso fue el de SRK/ T con constante optimizada de con un Error Mediano Absoluto (EMedA) de 0.275, seguido por SRK/T con la constante original (EMedA:0,3), SRK/T con 3 constantes personalizadas ( EMedA: 0.31) T2 (EMedA: 0.33), T2 con constante optimizada (EMedA:0.38) y finalmente Holladay 1 con Factor del Cirujano Optimizado (EMedA:0.388). CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados muestran que el cálculo del lente intraocular SN60WF para pacientes altamente miopes usando los métodos de SRK/T con una constante optimizada de 119.0, SRK/T con 3 constantes personalizadas según la queratometrìa y fórmula T2 es más preciso. Se requieren estudios en poblaciones más grandes para aclarar las tendencias del presente estudio 2
3 ABSTRACT PURPOSE: To Compare the accuracy of various published methods to improve the IOL calculation in highly myopic patients ( higher than 25 mm) PLACE: Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalém Israel METHODS: Cases with an axial lenght higher than 25 mm to 30 mm which underwent cataract surgery were collected from the database of the Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, the cases received Phacoemulsification surgery with IOL implant SN60WF, the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) power was done using optic biometry (IOL Master) and the SRK/T formula. After successful surgery and followup period of minimum 3 weeks, the cases were evaluated by optometry and then a back calculation of the IOL power was done using the SRK/T with optimized A constant of 119,0; SRK/T with 3 IOL personalized constants according to the keratometry, T2 formula, T2 formula with an optimized A constant of 119.0, and Holladay 1 with an optimized surgeon factor of 1.84, the results were compared looking for the more accurate and for concordance between the methods RESULTS: 55 cases (eyes) were obtained, from 38 patients, the most accurate methods according to the median absolute error (MedAE) was SRK/T with an optimized A constant of (MedAE: 0.275), followed by SRK/T with the original constant (MedAE: 0.3), SRK/T with 3 personalized constants (MedAE0.31) and T2 formula (MedAE: 0.33), finally the Holladay 1 formula with Optimized Surgeon Factor (MedAE: 0.388) CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the IOL calculation for the SN60WF IOL in highly myopic eyes with the SRK/T formula using an optmized constant of 119.0, the SRK/T formula with 3 personalized A constants according to the keratometry values and the T2 formula show accuracy and concordance and can be used in these cases, A higher amount of cases is necessary to improve the tendency shown in the present sample. 3
4 INTRODUCTION Myopia can be defined as a refractive error in which parallel rays of light are brought to focus in front of the retina in a resting eye 1. High myopia, on the other hand, is defined as a spherical refractive power of 5 diopters or higher 2. The etiology of this condition is not well understood and factors like near sight activities performed since an early age and scant outdoor activity have been considered, genetic loci have been identified and approved by the Human Genome Organization Gene Nomenclature Committee, and called MYP 1 to MYP 14 in the chromosomes X, 1, 2-4,7,8,11,17,18,22, most of them related to high, early onset myopia 2 The worldwide prevalence of myopia ranges from 17 to 95% 3 A report regarding myopia in the United States, registered a prevalence of 33,1%,, most of these cases corresponded to young and white females 4. In A nation-wide study of myopia performed in Israel in 312,149 subjects, 17 to 19 years old, it was found that a 16,27% of this population was myopic, with an increased prevalence in female subjects 5. Another big study performed in Israel with a population of teenagers and young adults from 16 to 22 years old from 1990 to 2002, determined that the prevalence of myopia has increased in the cited population, with a remarkable change in the group of highly myopic eyes, which started on 13,5% in 1990 and increased to 20,7% in 2002 for female, and in male from 11,6% in 1990 to 16,3% in In regard of this information it is understood that some populations like the Israeli, show a tendency to increase the prevalence of its myopic patients, therefore, the incidence of high myopia will also increase. Also, while these populations become older, the need for an accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation for cataract surgery in myopic patients will also increase. Myopic eyes differ in many ways from emmetropic eyes. A longer axial length, an increased diameter of the lens capsular bag and a deeper anterior chamber are 4
5 found 7, these features are responsible of a deeper position of the IOL in the bag, which also is related to an hyperopic surprise after IOL calculation 8. On the other hand, the IOL s positioning in the bag is also affected, the posterior capsule takes more time to make contact with the posterior IOL s surface 7. some concepts must be taken into account when calculating IOLs for myopic patients, which include: 1. The Axial length (AL) patients with a staphiloma are considered a problem when measuring with ultrasound, the optic biometry is able to overcome this pitfall because the measurements can be done respect to the fixation point of the patient. 8 In spite of this statement, Olsen and Thorwest 9 found that the preoperative AL was longer than the post-operative axial length by around 0,08 mm on average, and a proposed a model of the phakic eye with a slightly higher refractive index of 1,3616 was developed. Other authors describe transformation formulas to improve the AL measurement by the IOL master, examples are found in the studies by Preußner et al 10 and Li Wang et al 11 who found a reduction in the amount of eyes left hyperopic using methods of back calculation of AL in order to obtain a prediction error of 0. Another problem related with the AL is specific to the commonly used formula SRK/T, which requires a correction when measuring AL longer than 24,2. This was fixed by the original authors with a change in the step 2, introducing a corrected axial length (LCOR) according to the following calculation: If LCOR 24,2 then LCOR= -3, ,716 x 36,2 0,0237 x 36,2 In spite this correction, Sheard et al. documented that when the AL reaches a value of 36,2 mm, the LCOR reaches a maximum of 27,62 mm and, after this point, the LCOR decreases while the actual AL increases, this is an illogical behavior called the LCOR reversal, the cited author states that when the AL is greater than or equal to 36.2 mm, LCOR should be a constant (LCOR = mm). This calculation is part of the T2 formula 5
6 which also makes a correction in the corneal height, this will be reviewed later in the text The anterior chamber depth (ACD) is defined as the axial distance from the central front surface of the cornea to the central front surface of the crystalline lens, it plays an important role as a source of error in cases where the AL has been accurately measured, this is because the ACD is related to the effective lens position (ELP), which is the distance from the anterior surface of the cornea to the effective main plane of the IOL in the visual axis. The ACD and ELP are part of the calculation of the IOL constants used in the different formulas, for example, in order to calculate the A constant for the SRK/T formula, the ACD is necessary (A = [(ACD ) ]0.5663) the same thing happens with the Surgeon factor from Holladay s formula (SF = ACD 3,595). The conclusion is that the ELP is contained in the A constant 8. A higher value of an A constant is reflected by a longer ACD value, most of the time this combination will be observed in the presence of a long eye. Petermier et al. describe that a more accurate AL measurement could not improve the IOL calculation for highly myopic eyes, and instead of facing the issue by changing the AL like the previous description, these authors calculated individualized IOL constants based on the postoperative refractive results, separately for the positive-diopter and negative-diopter ranges within the framework of the User Group for Laser Interference Biometry project to optimize constants for optical biometry, the cited authors performed a study in which they optimized the IOL constants, the base of this procedure was the assumption that the main error in IOL calculation was the difficulty to measure the ELP properly, this because of, 1) the IOL lens calculated can be negative, positive or zero, a fact that changes the calculation patterns (most formulas are not designed to deal with negative 6
7 values). 2) The anatomy of the lens is also changed when there is a positive or negative lens, because the main plane of the lens moves, according to the power required. The optimization of constants allowed them to reach a refractive deviation of zero in positive and negative IOLs using the Haigis, Sanders Retzlaff Kraff/T (SRK/T), Holladay, Hoffer Q, and Sanders Retzlaff Kraff II (SRK II), although the intraocular lenses with a value of zero didn t perform that well in the sample. 13. Youngsub et al, demonstrated a median absolute error decrease from 0.29 D to 0.23 D using the SRK/T formula with personalized optimized constants, using the IQ intraocular lens, (P= 0.001). The conclusion of the study was that for a steep cornea, the calculated A-constant would be of a lower value, but for a flat cornea, a higher magnitude A-constant was necesary. The use of personalized A-constants based on the keratometic values showed improvement in the refractive outcomes Corneal height. A big study by Sheard et al. using eyes concluded that the SRK/T, has a non-physiological behavior when calculating IOL power in certain keratometric values, this means that with certain axial length and keratometric readings, the estimation of the corneal height value does not follow a normal curve, but has an unexpected peak, known as the corneal height cusp, after this point, the gradient reverses and all the curves show an almost linear relationship. The shape of the corneal height curves suggests that in the vicinity of the cusp, the SRK/T formula may overestimate the corneal height. The original SRK/T formula changes negative values of X, to 0, in order to prevent the formula from attempting to take the square root of a negative number, this is the solution to the ACD problem. In this region, the corneal height was equal to the corneal radius of curvature. 12 In order to deal with this pitfall,, the referred authors considered that a new corrected formula based on the SRK/T, this formula was published under 7
8 the name of T2 and has a reported 10% improved accuracy (with a lower IOL mean error than the calculations performed by the regular SRK/T). 12 The T2 formula overcomes the non-physiological behavior of the corneal height of the regular SRK/T formula correcting the steps 2 to 4 by a regression formula: H2= -10, ,32630 x L + 0,13533 x K. With this calculation, it is possible to avoid the peak in corneal height calculation which appears in a point when combining specific AL and Keratometric values, the ones of our interest would be the curve of 24 mm axial length which peak is found at around 50 diopters of mean keratometry, 26 mm, around 47 D and 28 mm around 46 D. 12 To the best of our knowledge, no publication has compared the described methods, therefore, an study using the SRK/T formula without A constant optimization, SRK/T with 1 optimized A constant (taken from the ULIB website), SRK/T with 3 optimized A constants personalized according to the keratometric values, T2 formula, T2 formula with 1 optimized A constant (taken from the ULIB website), and the Holladay 1 formula with an optimized Surgeon Factor (taken from the ULIB website) is proposed. 8
9 METHODS Study design: Observational analytical retrospective cohort Population: Highly myopic patients, defined as those having more than -5 D of spherical power lens correction, which underwent uneventful crystalline lens phacoemulsification and IOL insertion in the Hadassah Ophthalmology clinic from June 2012 until January 2014 in one of the surgeon s surgical practice (Dr EA). Institutional review board approval was obtained from The Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. All research and data collection followed the tenets of the Helsinki Agreement. Inclusion criteria: Highly myopic patients (AL longer than 25 mm), implant of IOL Acrisoft SN60WF acrylic, A constant 118.7, Visual acuity > 20/40 in the operated eye, after cataract surgery Exclusion criteria: Patients who were not measured by optical biometry, patients who suffer of any ophthalmological condition that could affect the accuracy of biometric measurements, (retinal detachment surgery, corneal scars), patients that have suffered of any ophthalmological condition that could affect their best corrected visual acuity apart from their cataract (choroidal neovascularization due to myopia or NVAMD, Diabetic Macular Edema, Optic Atrophy or Optic neuritis) appearing previous to the surgery or during the time the patients are being followed, myopic degeneration and glaucoma patients would be excluded only if their condition affects severely the visual acuity, traumatic cataract cases, previous ocular surgery (pe netrating keratoplasty), complicated surgery (e.g., anterior or posterior capsular tears), sulcus fixated lenses, IOL exchanges, postoperative complications, indwelling silicone oil history of any kind of refractive surgery in the case) Variables: The following information should be obtained from the clinical records to calculate the IOL according to the methods previously described: AL, measured with the IOL Master, K1, K2, measured with IOL Master or autorefractometer 9
10 keratometry, if IOL Master measurement was not available, best corrected Preoperative VA, measured with the ETDRS chart, converted to fraction, best corrected Postoperative VA. measured with the ETDRS chart, converted to fraction, lens A constant and other constants required according to the formulas used, post operative spherical power, post operative cylinder, post-operative spherical equivalent, IOL Prediction deviation from the target refraction in the postoperative. The refractive prediction error will be calculated according to the analysis published by J. Aramberri 15 : which includes the following steps: 1) The expected refraction with a certain IOL power was subtracted from the expected refraction from an IOL 1,0 Diopter higher or lower than the first one.2) 1 is divided by this value, resulting in the magnitude in IOL power that should produce 1.0 D of refractive change (IOL1DRx). 3) This value was multiplied by the refractive error (Rx) calculation and added to the implanted lens power. The result is the emmetropic power in the case. The IOL power required for emmetropia in the case is subtracted from the IOL power that would lead to the refraction target and this is divided by the IOL1DRx value, the result is the predicted refractive error that would be obtained with this method, finally, this is subtracted from the original refraction target in order to know the numerical error, and this value is converted to absolute values to obtain the absolute numerical error, this operation was repeated for the other methods included in the present study. The IOL power calculation methods included were: SRK/T with original constant, SRK/T with optimized constant (SRK/T O.C.), T2, T2 with optimized constant (T2 O.C.), SRK/T with 3 Optimized constants according to the K value (119,08 for K lower than 43,0 D; for K from 43,0 to 44.7 D and for a K higher than 44,7 D 14 ) and Holladay 1 with Optimized Surgeon Factor (Holladay 1), for each method the following values were obtained: IOL power, IOL power equivalence in the glasses plane using the formula, IOL deviation from target refraction, percentage of cases with an error within + 0,50 D, from +0,50 to +1,00 D, from +1,00 to +2,00 D and within an error to +2,00 D 10
11 The Optimized A constant for the 118,7 Alcon IOL, SN60WF is 119,0 according to the ULIB group with 5128 cases 16, The Holladay 1 Surgeon Factor (S.F) of 1.84 was used according to the ULIB website. Mean numerical and absolute error as well as median absolute error were compared between methods, employing the Lin s coefficient of Correlation and Concordance. Correlation between mean Keratometry and Absolute error (AE), as well as between AL and AE were measured with Pearson s coefficient. The analysis was done using Excel 2013, Graph Pad Prism 6,0, MedCalc and SPSS software 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,IL) 11
12 RESULTS Descriptive statistics Demographics: After using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 patients were obtained, with a mean age of 68,47 years old (Standard Deviation(SD): 10,31, maximum value: 85 years old, minimum value: 43 years old), and a gender distribution of 55,2% female (21 patients) and 44,7% male (17 patients).from this group, a total of 55 eyes (cases) underwent Phaco + IOL procedure. Preoperative status: The visual acuity is presented as a fraction from the ETDRS chart.in the preoperative visit had a mean of 0,3565 (SD: 0,2303, min: 0,05, max: 0,9). The axial length had a mean of 26,84 mm, (SD: 1,128mm, min: 25,18mm, max: 30,08mm). The keratometries showed the following values: K1 had a mean value of 43,56 diopters (SD 1,532 D, min 39,94D, max 46,81 D) and K2 had a mean value of 44,5 diopters (SD 1,429 D, min 40,23D, max 47,6 D), the mean keratometry was 44,03 Diopters (SD: 1,441 D, min: 40,08D, max 47,2D). The refraction target of the studied group had a mean of -1,749 Diopters (SD: 1,218 D min: 5 D, max: 0,68 D), The extreme -5 D refraction target was the case of one patient who didn t want to be operated in his second eye since he had a history of uveitis under control. Preoperative remarks of the studied cases included: Previous uveitis, not active at the moment of the surgery in three cases, significant peripapilary atrophy in one case, pseudoexfoliation syndrome in two cases, convergence defect in one patient, mild macular pseudohole in one case, and atrophic retinal changes without macular involvement in two cases. One case with staphyloma was registered 12
13 Actual surgical IOL Calculations: The Intraocular Lens (IOL) power calculations were first performed using the SRK/T with original constants, for the actual surgeries in which the IOL for refraction target was implanted, the value which would lead the case to emmetropia was calculated according to the method described previously 15. These results are summarized in table number 1. The actual refraction of the patients was obtained and converted to spherical equivalent, and the expected target refraction with which the IOL was calculated, was subtracted from this spherical equivalent, this value was used to measure the prediction error whicha was called numerical error, the absolute values were used to obtain the mean absolute error. Then errors expressed in diopters were grouped according to their magnitudes. From the calculated series, using the SRK/T with the original constant of 118,7, the Mean numerical error (MNE) was 0,049±0,65 (Min -1,965 Max 1,450) and the Mean absolute error (MAE) was 0,4768±0,467 (Min 0 Max 1,965). 70,9% (39 cases) had a ± 0,50 D error, 10,9% (6) had an error ranging from ±0,50 to 1,00 D, 14,5% (8) had an error of ± 1,00 to ±1,50 D while a 3,6% (2) had an error of ± 1,50 to ±2,00 D. Postoperative evaluation The best corrected visual acuity of the cases included had a mean of 0,8347, Standard deviation of 0,1837, (Min 0,5 Max 1,25). The postoperative refractive status of the cases was evaluated, these results are resumed in table number 2.The studied cases underwent uneventful surgeries, without complications in the postoperative time lapse. 1. IOL Calculation with different methods. The T2 formula: The IOL power calculated using this formula for the desired refraction target and for emetropia are summarized in table number 3.The mean numerical error (MNE) using this formula was 0,044 D (SD:0,687 D min: -2,078D 13
14 max:1,40d). the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) was 0,503 Diopters (SD 0,465 D min: 0,010 D, max: 2,078 D). The percentage of cases falling within ± 0,50 Diopters was 65,45% (30), from ± 0,50 to ± 1,00 it was 20%(11), from ± 1,00 to ± 1,50 diopters it was 12,72% (7), from ± 1,50 to ± 2,00 diopters it was 0% (0) and an error bigger than ± 2 D it was 1,81%(1) T2 fórmula with Optimized constant In an attempt of improving the results, the T2 formula was used together with the Optimized contstant of 119,0 provided by the ULIB website. The IOL results of this method are shown in table number 4. The MNE with this formula was -0,109 Diopters (SD: 0,67 D, min:-2,174 D max 1,239 D), the MAE was 0,49 D (SD: 0,466 D,min 0,0066 D, max 2,174 D). The percentage of cases falling within ± 0,50 Diopters was 65,45% (36), from ± 0,50 to ± 1,00 it was 20%(11), from ± 1,00 to ± 1,50 diopters it was 10,9% (6), from ± 1,50 to ± 2,00 diopters it was 1,81% (1) and an error bigger than ± 2 D it was 1,81%(1) The SRK/T formula, with an optimized constant of 119,0 generated the IOL power for refraction target and emmetropia which appear in table 5. The MNE using this method was -0,081 D (SD: 0,65 D, min: -2,05 D, max: 1,304 D). the MAE was 0,456 Diopters (SD: 0,4711 D, min: 0,011 D, max: 2,06 D). The percentage of cases falling within ± 0,50 Diopters was 67,27 % (37), from ± 0,50 to ± 1,00 it was 18,18%(10), from ± 1,00 to ± 1,50 diopters it was 10,90% (6), from ± 1,50 to ± 2,00 diopters it was 1,82% (1) and an error bigger than ± 2 D it was 1,82%(1). Holladay 1 formula with an optimized surgeon factor (SF) of 1,84 provided an IOL power as shown in table number 6, for both target refraction and emmetropia. The MNE with this formula was -0,232 Diopters (SD: 0,65 D, min: -1,51D max 1,58D), the MAE was 0,514 (SD: 0,456 D min, 0,022 D, max 1,58 D). The percentage of cases falling within ± 0,50 Diopters was 63,63% (35), from ± 0,50 to ± 1,00 it was 16,36%(9), from ± 1,00 to ± 1,50 diopters it was 16,35% (9), 14
15 from ± 1,50 to ± 2,00 diopters it was 3,63% (2) and an error bigger than ± 2 D it was 0%(0) Finally, the last method used in comparison with the previously described ones is the SRK/T with 3 constants, the results of this method are resumed in table number 7. The Median Absolute Error (MedAE), was calculated for the all the methods and is presented in a comparative way in table number 8. Graph number 1 summarizes and compares de outcomes of the MNE of the 6 formulas used for calculation in the present series. While graph number 2 shows the behavior of the MAE. Correlative Analysis A) Concordance Correlation Coefficient of Lin In order to improve the analysis, a Concordance correlation coefficient of Lin was calculated between all the methods, these calculations are summarized in table number 9 for Absolute Error. The following methods showed concordance: T2, T2 calculated with Optimized Constant of 119,0 (T2 + OC), SRK/T with Optimized Constant (SRK/T OC) of 119,0 and SRK/T with 3 Optimized constants Graphics number 3-8 show the scatter diagrams of the Absolute Error from these correlations. The relationship between the keratometry and the absolute error was also analyzed, no correlation was found with any method in the present sample. Table number 10 summarizes the data. On the other hand, a grouped analysis in order to find keratometric values where the absolute prediction error could be higher was also performed, the results are shown in table 11 A and 11 B. 15
16 The absolute error - axial length relationship was also analyzed, no correlation was found with any method in the present sample. Table number 12 summarizes this information.also a grouped analysis was performed between different axial lengths and the median absolute error, this is shown in table number 13. The Absolute error did not show a Gaussian distribution using the D'Agostino & Pearson normality test. DISCUSION In the present study, the method which showed the lowest Median Absolute Error was the SRK/T formula with an optimized A constant of 119,0 for the SN60WF lens (median absolute error: 0,2753). The accuracy of this method might be related to the high amount of cases provided for the A constant database used in the ULIB website (more than 5300 cases) 16, and is consistent with previous evidence showing the benefits of this method 17. In regard gf the evidence of the not physiologic behavior of the SRK/T formula when some K values are reached, a group analysis based on the mean keratometry was performed, it showed that the median absolute error (MedAE) of the SRK/T formula with the Optimized A Constant of 119,0, increased with values 44,7 D as shown in table 11 A (Median error of 0,2981) and more specifically in the group from 44 to 46 D group (Median error of 0,27) as shown in table 11 B, this agrees with what was described by Youngsub et al, who found that the SRK/T had an increased error in the extremes of the keratometric values, and suggested the use of personalized constants for cases with keratometries lower than 43.0 D which would benefit from an A constant of , cases from 43.0 D to 44.7 D which would have better results with an A constant of and those with a K higher 44,7 D that would require a K of Using the 3 constants reduced the median error from 0,36 to 0,24 in the cited report 14 Therefore a calculation with the 3 constants described in cited article was tested, these results are shown in table N. 13, the median absolute error found was 0,31 D which in comparison with 16
17 the other methods used, was slightly higher than that of SRK/T with the optimized A constant of 119,0 and the SRK/T with a non optimized A constant of 118,7. This could result from the necessity of further optimization of the 3 A constants for each surgical center, also, multicenter reports following the same A constant optimization protocol may be necessary in order to obtain a database which could be applied to different places.. In spite of the median error being higher for the 3 A constant optimized method than that of the SRK/T with one optimized A constant in the present sample, it is possible to see that the median absolute error in the individual keratometric groups Is kept very low and similar to that of the 1 optimized constant SRK/T as seen in table number 11A The T2 formula avoids the not physiological peak in corneal height calculation which appears in a point when combining specific AL and Keratometric values, the ones of our interest would be the curve of 24 mm axial length and 47 diopters of mean keratometry, 26mm, with 46 D and 28 around 45,5 D 12. These combinations of AL and Keratometric values are not common, but the T2 formula is able to overcome this issue. The mean keratometry of the present study was 44,03 D and the mean axial length was 26,84 mm, this means that at the least the mean values of the present sample, are not yet inside the slope areas of the not physiological behavior cusps of the regular SRK/T, allowing the calculations made by the SRK/T to be accurate within the limits of this study. The mean absolute error found in the present article with the T2 formula without constant optimization is of 0,5039 with a Median Absolute error of 0,33. The Mean absolute error found in the original article of the T2 formula was 0,3064. Since the sample used for the original T2 study is big, around 5600 cases, it is clear that the distribution of the data will be Gaussian, and therefore closer to the median, so it is possible to state that the median absolute error in the present study is similar to the mean absolute error found by Sheard et al. 12 The same is true for the T2 formula used in conjunction with the Optimized constant, which Median absolute error is not far from the mentioned one (0,38). 17
18 A more detailed study comparing the absolute error and the keratometry showed that the best performance of the T2 formula in the present study was in the group of 42 to 44 D (MedAE:0,312), and the worse wa s in the group of 46 to 48 D (MedAE: 0,4928). The T2 with A constant optimization showed the best results in the 44 to 46 D (MedAE: 0,230), and the worse results in the 40 to 42 D (MedAE: 0,517). In this regard we could suggest that either an A constant personalization or a different optimized constant is necessary to further improve the results of the T2 formula. In any case, this formula has shown adequate correlation with the SRK/T formula with an optimized A constant, and therefore it can be used as good tool for IOL calculation in highly myopic cases. The Holladay 1 formula was also calculated using the ULIB optimized surgeon factor of 1,84, a median absolute error of 0,3883 was obtained, being this the higher between the methods compared in the present study, this fact could be explained by the already documented reduced accuracy of the Holladay 1 formula for IOL calculation in eyes with axial lengths longer than 26 mm 18. The Mean absolute error reported for this method in the present study of 0,5138 is similar to the mentioned study by Hoffer for very long eyes, where the error is 0, The Median Absolute error is of a higher magnitude than the reported by Li Wang, which had a value of 0,40 11, in which the IOL calculation was improved, optimizing the AL with a back calculation. According to these findings we understand that optimizing the Surgeon Factor is not enough to improve the accuracy of this formula, and that an AL based optimization is necessary in order to improve the results. All the methods used in this study were tested for concordance, using Lin s 19, 20 Concordance and Correlation coefficient taking the absolute error as the output comparison variable, the SRK/T with Optimized Constant was used as the gold standard because of its accuracy proved in several publications 8,16,17 18
19 The result of this analysis showed concordance between SRKT with optimized A constant, T2 formula, and T2 with optimized constant, according to this, the concordance between SRK/T with Optimized A Constant and the T2 formula was moderate (0,90), this was the same for the concordance between the SRK/T with Optimized Constant and T2 with Optimized A Constant (0,91). Also the SRK/T with 3 Optimized constants showed a moderate concordance with the T2 formula (0,91), and a substantial concordance with the SRK/T with optimized constant of 119,0 (0,96) and T2 with optimized constant of 119,0 (0,959). This shows that this method can also be used as a good tool for IOL calculation in highly myopic patients. The concordance between SRK/T with Optimized constant with the Holladay 1 formula with Optimized Surgeon Factor was poor (0,78 for the second). The concordance results are summarized in table 8 and graphics 3 8, showing that the three methods referred (SRK/T with Optimized A Constant of 119, SRK/T with 3 optimized A constants, T2, T2 with Optimized Constant) can be used obtaining good results in highly myopic eyes. In the present study the SRK/T with 1 A optimized constant still shows superiority respect to the other formulas. A correlation between the absolute error and the keratometric values was sought, but no method showed significant p values for the Pearson correlation coefficient, this information is summarized in table N. 9 The relationship between axial length values and the absolute error was also analyzed, finding no Pearson s correlation coefficient of statistical significance as shown in table N. 11, a grouped analysis was also done, in order to identify if a specific axial length showed higher median error, this information is summarized in table N. 12. The results from this last analysis are not conclusive since some of the groups have few cases. A comparison of the present study with other studies is provided in table
20 From the present study we can conclude that Myopic IOL calculation is still far from being as accurate as that for normal eyes, in any case several methods have been proposed to overcome this problem, being the SRK/T with an optimized constant, one of the most explored since the constant optimization process is relatively easy to obtain the more accurate IOL A constant, also several groups around the globe are providing thousands of cases with IOL constants optimized for commonly used IOLs, this is the case of the ULIB web site of Zeiss, which can become a very useful tool for those interested in improving their results when it comes to IOL calculation for myopic patients. Using the SRK/T formula with the correct optimized constant shows excellent results. The use of Holladay 1 formula for highly myopic eyes (AL longer than 26 mm) is not encouraged, since even with a Surgeon Factor constant optimization, the results are less accurate than those of the SRK/T. The T2 formula with or without an A constant optimization also provides very accurate results, although in the the present sample, the use of the optimized constant of 119,0 showed worse results than those with the regular 118,7 A constant, therefore more studies in order to obtain a better constant optimization for the T2 formula are encouraged. Advantages of the present study include a homogeneous sample, with eyes with high myopia, operated by the same surgeon and with the same IOL implanted, also the calculations were performed using exclusively the IOL Master optical biometry in a single center, also four documented methods are compared and the T2 formula is used for the first time in a study besides the original one. Pitfalls of the present study include a relatively small sample size. The A constant optimization is a useful method to improve the results of the SRK/T formula lowering the Median error, for the IQ IOL, the optimized A constant widely calculated is of 119,0, according to the ULIB website, and used in the present study, this approach proved to be accurate. 20
21 The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Sheard for providing the necessary software for IOL calculation with the T2 formula as well as the Barraquer Institute of America research head, Clara Lopez de Mesa, who provided advice for the statistical analysis. 21
22 References 1. Seang-Mei Saw, Joanne Katz, et al Epidemiology of Myopia, Epidemiologic Reviews No2, 1996, pg Hornbeak Dana, Young Terri et al, Myopia genetics: a review of current research and emerging trends, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Vol. 20, September 2009, p Nangia V, Jonas JB et al, Refractive error in Central India: The Central India Eye and Medical Study, Ophthalmology, 2010; 117(4): Vitale S,Ellwein L, et al, Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, , Archives of Ophthalmology, 2008, 126, Rosner M, Belkin M, A nation-wide study of myopia prevalence in Israel. Findings in a population of 312,149 young adults, Metabolic Pediatric and Systemic Ophthalmology, 1991; 14(2), Yosefa Bar Dayan, Avi Levin, The Changing Prevalence of Myopia in Young Adults: A 13-Year Series of Population-Based Prevalence Surveys, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: Yinying Zhao, Jin Li and associates, Capsular Adhesion to Intraocular Lens in Highly Myopic Eyes Evaluated In Vivo Using Ultralong-scan-depth Optical Coherence Tomography, American Journal of Ophthalmology 2013;155: Kenneth J. Hoffer, MD and asociates, IOL Power formulas & special circumstances, 2010, American Academy of Ophthalmology. 9. Olsen T, Thorwest M. Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31: ) 10. Preußner P-R, Olsen T, Hoffmann P, Findl O. Intraocular lens calculation accuracy limits in normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: Li Wang, MD, PhD, Mariko Shirayama, Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm, J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: ), 22
23 12. Sheard R, Smith G, et al, Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2010; 36: ). 13. Petermeier, K, Gekeler F, Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes, J Cataract Refract Surg, : ) 14. Youngsub Eom, MD, Su-Yeon Kang, MD, Use of Corneal Power-Specific Constants to Improve the Accuracy of the SRK/T Formula Ophthalmology 2013;120: ) 15. Jaime Aramberri, MD Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: Double-K method, J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: Optimized IOL Constants for the ZEISS IOLMaster calculated from patient data, ULIB,User Group for Laser Interference Biometry, accessed the 23/4/ Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H. Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber depth prediction algorithm, J Cataract Refract Surg May;21(3): Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(8): Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989; 45, McBride G.B, A Proposal for Strength of Agreement Criteria for Lin s Concordance Correlation Coefficient, NIWA Client Report: HAM , May 2005, NIWA Project: MOH 05201pp:5-6 23
24 Tables and graphics Table Number 1 IOL CALCULATION WITH SRK/T FORMULA SRK/T CALCULATION FOR TARGET REFRACTION SRK/T CALCULATION FOR EMMETROPIA MEAN 13,1 Diopters 10,31 Diopters S. DEVIATION 2,739 D 3,12 D MINIMUM 6 D 0,85 D MAXIMUM 18 D 16,5 D n= 55 cases (eyes) Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. Table Number 2 POST OPERATIVE REFRACTIVE RESULTS SPHERE CYLINDER AXIS SPHERICAL EQUIVALENT MEAN -1,436 Diopters -0,7227 Diopters 80,38 degrees -1,798 Diopters S. DEVIATION 1,184 D 0,7693 D 62,29 degrees 1,325 D MINIMUM -4,25 D -2,5 D 0 degrees -4,75 D MAXIMUM 0,25 D 1,25 D 180 degrees 0,625 D n= 55 cases, Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. Table Number 3: IOL POWER CALCULATION USING THE T2 FORMULA T2 FORMULA CALCULATION FOR TARGET REFRACTION T2 FORMULA CALCULATION FOR EMMETROPIA MEAN 12,94 Diopters 10,26 Diopters S. DEVIATION 2,889 D 3,061D MINIMUM 5,32 D 0,7039D MAXIMUM 17,85 D 15,12 D n= 55 cases, Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. 24
25 Table Number 4: IOL POWER CALCULATION USING T2 FORMULA + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT T2 FORMULA + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT (119,0) FOR TARGET REFRACTION MEAN 13,17 10,44 T2 FORMULA + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT (119,0) FOR EMMETROPIA S. DEVIATION 2,929 3,114 MINIMUM 5,41 0,71 MAXIMUM 18,15 15,37 n= 55 cases, Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. Table Number 5: IOL POWER CALCULATION USING THE SRK/T FORMULA WITH Optimized constant (119,0) SRK/T FORMULA WITH OPTIMIZED CONSTANT (119,0) FOR TARGET REFRACTION SRK/T FORMULA WITH OPTIMIZED CONSTANT (119,0) FOR EMMETROPIA MEAN 13,16 Diopters 10,42 Diopters S. DEVIATION 2,869 D 3,088 D MINIMUM 6,109 D 0,8591 D MAXIMUM 18,14 D 15,16 D n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. Table Number 6 IOL POWER CALCULATION USING THE HOLLADAY 1 FORMULA HOLLADAY FORMULA FOR HOLLADAY FORMULA FOR TARGET REFRACTION EMMETROPIA MEAN 12,66 9,997 S. DEVIATION 3,09 3,269 MINIMUM 4,701 0,2833 MAXIMUM 18,22 15,24 n= 55 cases, Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. 25
26 Table N. 7 Summary of IOL calculation using 3 optimized constants with the SRK/T formula. Optimized Constants for the IQ IOL according to keratometry. 43 : ,7 : ,7 : Emmetropic IOL Mean: (SD 3.112, min: max: 15.38) Target refraction IOL Mean: (SD 2.89, min: max: 18.22) Median Absolute Error 0,3104 Mean Absolute Error 0,4538 Mean Numerical Error -0,1005 Minimum Value 0,00926 Maximum Value 2,084 Error group 0,00-0,25 D 0,25 0,50 D 0,50-1,00 D 1,00 2,00 D 2,00 Percentage / Number 69,09 % / % / 11 7,27 % / 4 1,81 % / 1 1,81 % / 1 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 26
27 Table N. 8 Comparison of IOL calculation formulas for Myopic eyes regarding their Error METHOD MEDIAN ABSOLUTE ERROR MEAN NUMERICAL ERROR MEAN ABSOLUTE ERROR ABSOLUTE ERROR MINIMUM VALUE ABSOLUTE ERROR MAXIMUM VALUE SRK/T 0,3-0,048 0, ,965 T2 0,33 0,044 0,5039 0, ,0776 SRK/T WITH OPTIMIZED CONSTANT T2 WITH OPTIMIZED CONSTANT HOLLADAY 1 WITH OPTIMIZED CONSTANT SRK/T 3 A PERSONALIZED CONSTANTS 0,2753-0,081 0,4565 0, ,0583 0,3872-0,10 0,4929 0, ,174 0,3883 0,23 0,5138 0, ,5813 0,3104-0,1005 0, n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. 27
28 Table N. 9 Correlation and Concordance Coefficient of Lin regarding the Absolute Error using different IOL calculation methods ( 95% Confidence Interval) METHOD SRKT T2 SRK/T + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT T2 + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT HOLLADAY 1 WITH OPTIMIZED S.F. SRK/T 3 PERSONALIZED A CONSTANTS SRK/T 0,77 (95% CI 0,64 to 0,86) 0,80 (95% CI 0,68 to 0,88) 0,73 (95% CI 0,59 to 0,84) 0,70 (95% CI 0,54 to 0,82) 0,7753 (95%CI 0,6437 to 0,8623) T2 0,90 (95% CI 0,83 to 0,94) 0,93 (95% CI 0,89 to 0,96) 0,80 (95% CI 0,68 to 0,88) 0,9112 (95% CI: 0,8530 to 0,9470) SRK/T + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT 0,91 (95% CI 0,85 to 0,95) 0,78 (95% CI 0,65 to 0,87) 0,9672 (95% CI: 0,9446 to 0,9807) T2 + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT 0,72 (95% CI 0,56 to 0,82) 0,9596 (95% CI:0,9320 to 0,9761) HOLLADAY 1 WITH OPTIMIZED SURGEON FACTOR 0,7494 (95% CI: 0,6071 to 0,8451) n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. 28
29 Table N. 10 Comparison of the correlation between the Absolute error from various methods for IOL calculation and the Mean Keratometry, in myopic eyes. METHOD Pearson correlation coefficient (Absolute error and Mean K) p value SRK/T 0,089 0,517 SRK/T+OPTIMIZED CONSTANT 0,0051 0,970 T2 0,134 0,329 T2 + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT -0,017 0,903 HOLLADAY 1 OPTIMIZED S.F. -0,0114 0,934 SRK/T+3 O. CONSTANTS -0,012 0,93 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 29
30 Table N. 11 A Median absolute error for different IOL Calculation methods related to the Mean Keratometric values. Mean Keratometry Absolute Error T2 Absolute Error SRK/T Absolute Error Holladay 1 with Optimized Surgeon Factor Absolute Error SRK/T + Optimized A Constant Absolute Error T2 + Optimized A Constant Absolute Median Absolute Error SRK/T 3 O.C. N D 0,3192 min 0,04 max: 1,45 0,3075 min:0,045 max: 1,25 0,285 min:0,085 max:1,476 0,243 min:0,111 max:1,386 0,4814 min:0,025 max:1,597 0,337 min:0,029 max:1, ,7 D 0,311 min: 0,010 max: 2,078 0,315 min: 0 max: 1,965 0,4535 min: 0,026 max: 1,58 0,2645 min: 0,010 max: 2,058 0,3629 min:0,0066 max:2,174 0,314 min:0,0377 max:2, ,7 D 0,3863 min:0,060. max1,35 0,2625 min:0. max:1,59 0,3371 min: 0,022 max: 1,41 0,2981 min: 0,028 max: 1,74 0,4018 min:0,012 max: 1,53 0,3037 min:0,009 max:1,56 18 Total n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 30
31 Table N. 11 B Median absolute error for different IOL Calculation methods related to the Mean Keratometric values. Mean Keratometry Median Absolute Error T2 Median Absolute Error SRK/T Median Absolute Error Holladay 1 + O. S.F. Median Absolute Error SRK/T + O. C. Median Absolute Error T2+ O. C. Median Absolut e Error SRK/T 3 O.C. N D 0,365 0,2375 0,5409 0,2601 0,5175 0, D 0,3125 0,3150 0,3404 0,264 0,38 0, D 0,373 0,450 0,455 0,2753 0,230 0, D 0,4928 0,225 0,355 0,22 0,387 0,30 5 Total n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 31
32 Table N. 12 Comparison of the correlation between the Absolute error from various methods for IOL calculation and the Axial length, in myopic eyes. METHOD Pearson correlation coefficient (Absolute error and Axial Length ) p value SRK/T 0,0091 0,947 SRK/T+OPTIMIZED CONSTANT 0,075 0,584 T2-0,0429 0,756 T2 + OPTIMIZED CONSTANT 0,0832 0,546 HOLLADAY 1 OPTIMIZED S.F. 0,1136 0,409 SRK/T + 3 OPTIMIZED PERSONALIZED CONSTANTS 0,088 0,52 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 32
33 Axial length (mm) Table N. 13 Median absolute error for different IOL Calculation methods related to the Axial Length values. Median Absolute Error T2 Median Absolute Error SRK/T Median Absolute Error Holladay 1 O. S.F Median Absolute Error SRK/T Optimized Constant Median Absolute Error T2 Optimized Constant Median Absolute Error SRK/T, 3 Optimized Constants N ,3134 0,1775 0,1834 0,104 0,1899 0, ,33 0,315 0,4535 0,294 0,4806 0, ,351 0,43 0,4552 0,4746 0,4171 0, ,2874 0,3 0,3897 0,3577 0,4543 0, ,608 0,41 0,1086 0,4744 0,6983 0, , ,205 0,7757 0,1596 0, ,140 1 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel 33
34 Table N 14. Comparison of the present study with other studies calculating IOL for Highly Myopic Eyes. Study IOL Calculation methods included Results Number of cases Youngsub Eom, MD, Su-Yeon Kang, MD,et al Use of Corneal Power-Specific Constants to Improve the Accuracy of the SRK/T Formula Ophthalmology 2013;120: SRK/T formula with IOL constant optimization according to the keratometric power values, 1 to 3 optimized constants used, IQ and AO IOL s used. A constants: <43.0D: D- 44.7D: >44,7D: K 43.2 or 45.2 D MedAE 3 constants: 0, 24 All cases: 123, extreme K cases: 62 Sheard Richard, MA, FRCOphth,. Smith Guy T, FRCOphth,. Cooke David L, MD, Improving the prediction accuracy of the SRK/T formula: The T2 formula, J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36: SRK/T formula with optimized constant, T2 formula. A constant optimized for SN60WF of 118,97, IOLs included: SN60AT, SN60AT, and others. Mean absolute error of SRK/T with optimized constant: 0,3229 and of T2 with optimized constant: 0,3064. All cases: , SN60WF IOL cases: 6914 Li Wang, MD, PhD, Mariko Shirayama, MD, et al, Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm, J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: Holladay1, Haigis, SRK/T, Hoffer Q. Axial Length optimization, IOLs included: SN60WF, SN60AT, SN60T, MA60MA. MNE with manufacturer s formula, SN60 IOL, Holladay 1: 0,56 SRK/T: 0,27 Haigis 0,68 Hoffer Q 0,68 MAE with optimized AL and MedAE Holladay1:0,43;0,40 SRK/T: 0,47; 0,41 Haigis: 0,36; 0,29 Hoffer Q: 0,51; 0,42 All cases= 94 SN60WF= 55 cases Present study SRK/T, SRK/T 1 Optimized A Constant (119,0); SRK/T 3 Optimized A Constants ( <43.0D: D-44.7 D : >44,7 D: T2 formula, T2 formula with Optimized A Constant (119,0), Holladay 1 with Optimized S. F. (1,84). IOL: SN60WF IQ Method:MedAE/MNE/MAE. SRK/T:0,3/-0,048/0,47 SRK/T 1 Optimized constant:0,27/-0,081/0,45 SRK/T 3 Optimized constants:0,31/-0,10/0,45 T2: 0,33/0,044/0,50 T2 1 Optimized constant:0,38/- 0,10/0,49 Holladay 1 Optimized S.F: 0,38/0,23/0,51 All cases = 55 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel, MedAE: Median absolute error, MAE: Mean absolute error,mne: Mean numerical error 34
35 Graph Number 1: Mean Numerical Error from the methods used in the present study SRK/T 3 OPTIMIZED A CONSTANTS -0,1005 T2 AND OPTIMIZED CONSTANT -0,1094 Graph N. 1, Mean Numerical Error SRK/T AND 1 OPTIMIZED CONSTANT -0,08095 HOLLADAY1 0,2323 T2 0, ,04882 SRK/T -0,15-0,1-0,05 0 0,05 0,1 0,15 0,2 0,25 n= 55 cases. Source: Database of clinical records, Ophthalmology department, Hadassah Ein Keren Hospital, Jerusalem Israel. 35
Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster)
pissn: 1011-8942 eissn: 2092-9382 Korean J Ophthalmol 2018;32(3):241-248 https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0063 Original Article Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power
More informationPredictability and accuracy of IOL formulas in high myopia
ARTICLE Predictability and accuracy of IOL formulas in high myopia Mohamed Yasser Sayed Saif, MD 1 ; Mohamed Othman Abdel Khalek, MD 1 ; Ahmed Tamer Sayed Saif, MD 2 ; Passant Sayed Saif, MD 3 ; Sherif
More informationIOL Power Calculation for Children
1 IOL Power Calculation for Children Rupal H. Trivedi, MD MSCR M. Edward Wilson, MD The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this presentation. Intraocular lens (IOL) implantation
More informationAccuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas Ronald B. Melles, MD, 1 Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, 2 William J. Chang, MD 1 Purpose: To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas
More informationLearn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017
Learn Connect Succeed JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017 Faculty Biometry and IOL Calculations ASCRS and ASOA Symposium and Congress Los Angeles, CA Daniel H. Chang, M.D. - Empire Eye and Laser Center Bakersfield,
More informationComparison of the Effects of Bright Light, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Tropicamide 1%, and Pilocarpine 2% on Anterior Chamber Depth and IOL Power
Comparison of the Effects of Bright Light, Phenylephrine 2.5%, Tropicamide 1%, and Pilocarpine 2% on Anterior Chamber Depth and IOL Power Mona Sane MD, Vincent Imbrogno DO, Hoon Jung MD The authors have
More informationAccuracy of Biometry for Intraocular Lens Implantation Using the New Partial Coherence Interferometer, AL-scan
pissn: 1011-8942 eissn: 2092-9382 Korean J Ophthalmol 2014;28(6):444-450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.444 Original Article Accuracy of Biometry for Intraocular Lens Implantation Using the New
More informationRefractive Changes after Removal of Anterior IOLs in Temporary Piggyback IOL Implantation for Congenital Cataracts
pissn: 1011-8942 eissn: 2092-9382 Korean J Ophthalmol 2013;27(2):93-97 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2013.27.2.93 Original Article Refractive Changes after Removal of Anterior IOLs in Temporary Piggyback
More informationRefractive Dilemma. Challenging Case
Challenging Case Refractive Dilemma Section Editor: Alireza Baradaran-Rafii, MD Case presentation A 21-year old man was referred to an ophthalmology clinic insisting on getting rid of his glasses which
More informationEfficacy and Safety of Cataract Extraction with Negative Power Intraocular Lens Implantation
The Open Ophthalmology Journal, 2008, 2, 15-19 15 Efficacy and Safety of Cataract Extraction with Negative Power Intraocular ens Implantation Michael A. Kapamajian 1 and Kevin M. Miller *,2,# 1 From the
More informationComparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods Following Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery: New Options Using a Rotating Scheimpflug Camera
pissn: 1011-8942 eissn: 2092-9382 Korean J Ophthalmol 2018;32(6):497-505 https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2018.0008 Original Article Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods Following Myopic
More informationIntraoperative biometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation at silicone oil removal
European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 13 no. 7, 2003 / pp. 622-626 Intraoperative biometry for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation at silicone oil removal S.M. EL-BAHA, A. EI-SAMADONI, H.F. IDRIS,
More informationComparison of Corneal Power and Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after LASIK for Myopia
Comparison of Corneal Power and Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods after LASIK for Myopia Seyed Mohammad Reza Taheri, MD 1 Azita Kheiltash, MD, MPH 2 Hassan Hashemi, MD 1,3 Abstract Purpose: To
More informationTrabeculectomy is an effective method for lowering
ORIGINAL STUDY Refractive Outcome of Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Prior Trabeculectomy: Risk Factors for Postoperative Myopia Oliver L. Yeh, MD, Karine D. Bojikian, MD, Mark A. Slabaugh, MD, and Philip
More informationImmersion Vs Contact Biometery for Axial Length Measurement before Phacoemulsification
Original Article Immersion Vs Contact Biometery for Axial Length Measurement before Phacoemulsification with Foldable IOL Irum Abbas, Atif Mansoor Ahmad, Tahir Mahmood Pak J Ophthalmol 2009, Vol. 25 No.
More informationPostoperative refraction changes in phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation of different types of intraocular lens
371-376 Iwase:Shoja 7-04-2008 16:57 Pagina 371 European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 18 no. 3, 2008 / pp. 371-376 Postoperative refraction changes in phacoemulsification cataract surgery with implantation
More informationPartial Coherence Interferometry as a Technique to Measure the Axial Length of the Eye Archived Medical Policy
Partial Coherence Interferometry as a Technique to Measure the Axial Length of the Eye Applies to all products administered or underwritten by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana and its subsidiary,
More informationPrediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery
Wu et al. BMC Ophthalmology (2017) 17:44 DOI 10.1186/s12886-017-0439-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Prediction accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation methods after laser refractive surgery Yubo
More informationComparison of ultrasound and optic biometry with respect to eye refractive errors after phacoemulsification
Received: 5.5.2007 Accepted: 22.1.2008 Comparison of ultrasound and optic biometry with respect to eye refractive errors after phacoemulsification Heidarali Moeini*, Fateme Eslami**, Akram Rismanchian*,
More informationTHE PENTACAM AXL. Improving Cataract Surgery Outcomes. Optical biometry and anterior segment tomography in one device
Insert to November/December 2016 Sponsored by OCULUS THE PENTACAM AXL Improving Cataract Surgery Outcomes Optical biometry and anterior segment tomography in one device A New Way to Calculate IOL Power
More informationInaccuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction for Cataract Surgery in Angle-Closure Glaucoma
Original Article DOI 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.2.206 pissn: 0513-5796, eissn: 1976-2437 Yonsei Med J 50(2):206-210, 2009 Inaccuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Prediction for Cataract Surgery in Angle-Closure
More informationFactors Affecting the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation with Lenstar
Original Article www.cmj.ac.kr Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation with Lenstar Tae Hee Lee, Mi Sun Sung, Lian Cui, Ying Li and Kyung Chul Yoon* Department of Ophthalmology,
More informationAssessing & co-managing cataract: Prof Charles NJ McGhee
Assessing & co-managing cataract: Prof Charles NJ McGhee This handout covers most of the PowerPoint slide details used in cataract lectures 1&2 and may be useful for notetaking during the lectures. Greater
More informationCATARACT SURGERY AFTER RADIAL KERATOTOMY
AFTER RADIAL KERATOTOMY How to avoid disappointment. BY BERNARD MATHYS, MD CATARACT SURGERY Radial keratotomy (RK; Figure 1) was a popular refractive surgical procedure to correct myopia in the 1970s and
More informationComparison of Newer IOL Power Calculation Methods for Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy PATIENTS AND METHODS. Patients
Special Issue Comparison of Newer IOL Power Calculation Methods for Eyes With Previous Radial Keratotomy Jack X. Ma, 1 Maolong Tang, 2 Li Wang, 3 Mitchell P. Weikert, 3 David Huang, 2 and Douglas D. Koch
More informationBiometric parameters, corneal astigmatism and ocular comorbidity in cataract surgery patients
Medical sciences (2018) 1 10 Biometric parameters, corneal astigmatism and ocular comorbidity in cataract surgery patients Aistė Varoniukaitė¹, Laurita Vaičaitė¹, Loreta Kuzmienė² 1 Faculty of Medicine,
More informationIssue 15 The following key clinical peer reviewed journals will be reviewed: MONTHLY RESEARCH UPDATE 151(3) American Journal of Ophthalmology 129(5)
Welcome to Bausch and Lomb s monthly research update. With our background in clinical ophthalmic research, mainly of the anterior eye, Bausch and Lomb have asked us to produce an independent report of
More informationFROM CATARACTS TO CLARITY
Cathy Cataracts FROM CATARACTS TO CLARITY If you re 55 or older, you may have cataracts and not even know it. What You Need to Know Seeing Beyond the Symptoms Cataracts are one of the leading causes of
More informationStart with ME. LEAVE A LEGACY OF EXCELLENT OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH ASTIGMATISM. TECNIS TORIC 1-PIECE IOL
LEAVE A LEGACY OF EXCELLENT OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH ASTIGMATISM. Start with ME. TECNIS TORIC 1-PIECE IOL INDICATIONS: The TECNIS Toric 1-Piece Posterior Chamber Lens is indicated for the visual correction
More informationMyopic Shift after Implantation of a Novel Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens in Korean Eyes
pissn: 1011-8942 eissn: 2092-9382 Korean J Ophthalmol 2018;32(1):16-22 https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2017.0060 Original Article Myopic Shift after Implantation of a Novel Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular
More informationMyopic Shift After Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children Less Than Two Years of Age
Original Article Myopic Shift After Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children Less Than Two Years of Age Suma Ganesh 1, Reena Gupta 2, Sumita Sethi 3, Chandra Gurung 4, Raman Mehta 5 1,5 Dr. Shroff s Charitable
More informationCataract Surgery in the Patient with a History of LASIK or PRK
Cataract Surgery in the Patient with a History of LASIK or PRK #56996-RS April 2018 Sebastian Lesniak, MD Matossian Eye Associates None Disclosures Bio Matossian Eye Associates, Hopewell NJ, 7/2015 Present
More informationCataract Surgery in Patients with a Previous History of KAMRA Inlay Implantation: A Case Series
Ophthalmol Ther (2017) 6:207 213 DOI 10.1007/s40123-017-0088-4 CASE SERIES Cataract Surgery in Patients with a Previous History of KAMRA Inlay Implantation: A Case Series Majid Moshirfar. Tyler S. Quist.
More informationClear Lens Extraction for Correction of High Myopia
Original Article Clear Lens Extraction for Correction of High Myopia Abbas Abolhasani 1, MD; Mostafa Heidari *2, MS; Ahmad Shojaei 1, MD; Seyed Hashem Khoee 1, MD; Mahmoud Rafati 1, MD; Ali Moradi 1, MS
More informationKeratometric measurements and IOL calculations in pseudophakic post-dsaek patients
Xu et al. BMC Ophthalmology (2018) 18:268 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0931-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Keratometric measurements and IOL calculations in pseudophakic post-dsaek patients Ke Xu,
More informationAuthor s Affiliation. Original Article. Comparison of Biometry in Phakic and Dense Modes. Muhammad Suhail Sarwar. Unaiza Mariam
Comparison of Biometry in Phakic and Dense Modes Original Article Purpose: To compare biometry readings in phakic and dense modes. Author s Affiliation Muhammad Suhail Sarwar Unaiza Mariam Correspondence
More informationCataract and cornea. Miltos O. Balidis PhD, FEBOphth,ICOphth ATHENS
Cataract and cornea Miltos O. Balidis PhD, FEBOphth,ICOphth CATARACT and Stromal opacities Keratoplasty Keratoconus Endothelial pathology Scars PTK Trypan blue 0.01%. Work at the transparent side of cornea
More informationABSTRACT. Keywords: Phacoemulsification/surgery; Lens implantation, intraocular; Cornea/surgery; Biometry; Refraction, Ocular
306 ARTIGO ORIGINAL Pseudoaccommodating bifocal intraocular lens implantation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery - refractive outcomes: case series of 8 eyes Implante de lentes intraoculares
More informationMultifocalS: A Reference Guide
MultifocalS: A Reference Guide Your complete resource for advanced technology IOL implantation, from patient selection to post-op evaluation For best results, use this comprehensive guide from start to
More informationComparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using the Binkhorst and SRK Formulae: A Clinical Study
Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Using the Binkhorst and SRK Formulae: A Clinical Study Pages with reference to book, From 38 To 40 Manzoor Hussain, Jehangir Durrani ( Department of Ophthalmology,
More informationPRODUCT INFORMATION Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
4-5-111-2 123 PRODUCT INFORMATION Alcon Laboratories, Inc. STERILE UV and Blue Light Filtering Acrylic Foldable Toric Optic Single-Piece Posterior Chamber Lenses ENGLISH PRODUCT INFORMATION... 2-2 -1-
More informationgo the distance NEW AcrySof IQ ReSTOR +2.5 D It s a wide world. Help your patients and everywhere in between.
NEW AcrySof IQ ReSTOR +2.5 D It s a wide world. Help your patients go the distance and everywhere in between. Now with ACTIVEFOCUS optical design for active-lifestyle patients. Recommend AcrySof IQ ReSTOR
More informationThe visual outcome after implantation of the Multifocal Intra Ocular Lens. Dr.Bhargav Dave National Institute of Ophthalmology Pune
The visual outcome after implantation of the Multifocal Intra Ocular Lens Dr.Bhargav Dave National Institute of Ophthalmology Pune 1 The era of cataract surgery has come leaps and bounds since the inception
More informationClinical Pearls. A Quick Guide to Crystalens AO Accommodating Lens
Clinical Pearls A Quick Guide to Crystalens AO Accommodating Lens See better. Live better. 2 3 Crystalens AO is the premium IOL that provides unsurpassed vision quality across a more natural range. As
More informationGetting Started GUIDE. TECNIS Symfony IOL and TECNIS Symfony TORIC IOL. TECNIS SYMFONY IOL pg 1
Getting Started GUIDE TECNIS Symfony IOL and TECNIS Symfony TORIC IOL TECNIS SYMFONY IOL pg 1 IN THIS GUIDE LENS SPECIFICATIONS pg 3 PREOPERATIVE pg 4-5 TECNIS Symfony IOL combines two complementary and
More informationClinical Evaluation of the BunnyLens IOL
Clinical Evaluation of the BunnyLens IOL Introduction: BunnyLens is a foldable Hydrophlic Acrylic IOL with four ear shaped haptic design. The lens design offers many advantages in terms of: 1. Centration
More informationLearn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017
Learn Connect Succeed JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2017 Cataract Surgery in 2017 DARBY D. MILLER, MD MPH CORNEA, CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF OPHTHALMOLOGY MAYO CLINIC FLORIDA Natural
More informationInformed Consent For Cataract Surgery. And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens INTRODUCTION
Informed Consent For Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens INTRODUCTION This information is given to you so that you can make an informed decision about having eye surgery. Take as
More informationLearn Connect Succeed. JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2015
Learn Connect Succeed JCAHPO Regional Meetings 2015 Pediatric Cataracts: Complicated Cases and Controversies M. Edward Wilson, M.D. N. Edgar Miles Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics Storm Eye Institute
More informationPrediction Error After Lens Implantation in Children With Axial Length Less than 22 mm Below 2 Yrs
E-ISSN 2454-2784 Original Article Prediction Error After Lens Implantation in Children With Axial Length Less than 22 mm Below 2 Yrs Reena Gupta 1, Suma Ganesh 2, Chekitaan Singh 3, A.K Khurana 1 1 Regional
More informationPractical Care of the Cataract Patient with Retinal Disease
Practical Care of the Cataract Patient with Retinal Disease Brooks R. Alldredge, OD, FAAO Kelly L. Cyr, OD, FAAO The Retina Center Eye Associates of New Mexico 4411 The 25 Way NE, Suite 325 Albuquerque,
More informationMeasure #191: Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery
Measure #191: Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery 2012 PHYSICIAN QUALITY REPORTING OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY DESCRIPTION: Percentage
More informationElectronic poster presentations
Electronic poster presentations Cataract Surgery E-00002 Blue-light exposure in an animal model of uveal melanoma B.F. Fernandes, S. Di Cesare, S. Maloney, J.-C. Marshall, W. Dawson, M.N. Burnier, Jr.
More informationResearch Article Reproducibility of the Optical Biometer OA-1000 (Tomey)
BioMed Research International, Article ID 814761, 6 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/814761 Research Article Reproducibility of the Optical Biometer OA-1000 (Tomey) Susanne Christiane Goebels, 1 Berthold
More informationREFRACTIVE LENS SURGERY: WHEN AND WHY?
REFRACTIVE LENS SURGERY: WHEN AND WHY? Symposium of the Hellenic Society of Intraocular Implant and Refractive Surgery Cairo, 14/3/2018 Pandelis A. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, FEBO, FEBOS-CR Director, Ophthalmology
More informationBiometric Measurements: Average Intra-Ocular Lens Power for Sudanese Patients with Senile Cataract
Optics 2015; 4(4): 25-30 Published online September 28, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/optics) doi: 10.11648/j.optics.20150404.11 ISSN: 2328-7780 (Print); ISSN: 2328-7810 (Online) Biometric
More information2/6/2018 RAPID FIRE PANEL: CO-MANAGEMENT OF UNUSUAL SITUATIONS IN CATARACT SURGERY. Andrew Siedlecki, M.D. Richard Orlando, M.D.
POLL QUESTION: HOW DID YOU DEVELOP THE CLINICAL SKILLS TO CO MANAGE RAPID FIRE PANEL: CO-MANAGEMENT OF UNUSUAL SITUATIONS IN CATARACT SURGERY Andrew Siedlecki, M.D. Richard Orlando, M.D. A) Working in
More informationIOL Calculations in Short, Long, and Postrefractive Eyes
IOL Calculations in Short, Long, and Postrefractive Eyes Ildamaris Montes de Oca, MD Sabite E. Gökce, MD Katie Hallahan, MD Li Wang, MD, PhD Douglas D. Koch, MD Intraocular lens (IOL) Calculations: Fundamentals
More informationThe Visian ICL Advantages
The Visian ICL Advantages Many vision correction procedures promise an improved level of vision, but few vision correction alternatives offer the quality and features found with the Visian ICL. These include:
More informationAdvanced Eyecare of Orange County/ Kim T. Doan, M.D.
Patient Information Sheet: Cataract Surgery And/Or Implantation of an Intraocular Lens This information is given to you so that you can prepare for the discussion with your eye surgeon. This document will
More informationOriginal article. Preliminar treatment of astigmatism during phacoemulsification. Sharma BR 1, Kumar A 2 1
Original article Preliminar eliminary experiences with limbal relaxing incision for treatment of astigmatism during phacoemulsification Sharma BR 1, Kumar A 2 1 Associate Professor, 2 Ophthalmologist,
More informationPatient Selection IOL Power Calculation. Patient Selection. Biometry IOL-Power calculation using Vericalc 2.0. AC-Depth > 3.0 mm (FDA 3.
Verisyse and VeriFlex Patient Selection IOL Power Verisyse and VeriFlex Iris Claw Technology for Correcting Refractive Errors in Phakic and Aphakic Eyes ESCRS 2011 Intructional Course 61 Josef Ruckhofer
More informationCataract Surgery: What You Must Know Before Having It Done
DAVID D. RICHARDSON, MD, INC. DAVID RICHARDSON, M.D. SAN MARINO EYE 2020 Huntington Drive San Marino, CA 91108 Telephone: (626) 289-7856 Fax: (626) 284-6532 Cataract Surgery: What You Must Know Before
More informationCataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Surgical and Visual Outcome with Foldable and Non-Foldable Lenses
www.jmscr.igmpublication.org Impact Factor 3.79 ISSN (e)-2347-176x Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Surgical and Visual Outcome with Foldable and Non-Foldable Lenses Authors Dr. Chitra Pande 1,
More informationIntraocular Lens Power Estimation in Combined Phacoemulsification and Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Eyes with Epiretinal Membranes: A Case-Control Study
Original Article http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.805 pissn: 0513-5796, eissn: 1976-2437 Yonsei Med J 56(3):805-811, 2015 Intraocular Lens Power Estimation in Combined Phacoemulsification and Pars
More informationPremium Implant Options for the Cataract Patient. Justin Schweitzer, OD, FAAO Vance Thompson Vision Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Premium Implant Options for the Cataract Patient Justin Schweitzer, OD, FAAO Vance Thompson Vision Sioux Falls, South Dakota Glaukos Bausch and Lomb Alcon Allergan Bio- Tissue TearScience Reichert Trends
More informationPublished in: British Journal of Ophthalmology. Document Version: Peer reviewed version
Clear lens extraction for the management of primary angle closure glaucoma: surgical technique and refractive outcomes in the EAGLE cohort Day, A., Cooper, D., Burr, J. M., Foster, P., Friedman, D., Gazzard,
More informationThe focus of this paper is the
Refraction planning in cataract: avoid creating an unhappy patient BY ROBERT H TAYLOR, ROGER B ELLINGHAM It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of a disease
More informationINFORMED CONSENT FOR CATARACT SURGERY
DESERT OPHTHALMOLOGY 1180 N Indian Canyon Drive W100 Palm Springs CA 92262 35900 Bob Hope Drive Suite 205 Rancho Mirage CA 92270 Phone (760) 320-8497 Fax (760) 320-5444 INFORMED CONSENT FOR CATARACT SURGERY
More informationCataracts in adults: management
Cataracts in adults: management NICE guideline: short version Draft for consultation, May 0 This guideline covers managing cataracts in adults aged and over. It aims to improve care before, during and
More informationEUROTIMES ESCRS SUPPLEMENT FEBRUARY 2007
Pentacam opens eyes to new diagnostic possibilities Scheimpflug based anterior segment tomography EUROTIMES ESCRS SUPPLEMENT FEBRUARY 2007 XXIV Congress of the ESCRS London, September 2006 Introduction
More informationTHE OUTCOME OF EXTRACAPSULAR AND PHACOEMULSIFICATION CATARACT EXTRACTIONS
JMBR: A Peer-review Journal of Biomedical Sciences June 2012, Vol. 11 No.1 pp 123-128 THE OUTCOME OF EXTRACAPSULAR AND PHACOEMULSIFICATION CATARACT EXTRACTIONS OSITA ME and YUEN SZ Abstract This study
More informationIOL Master. Photorefractive keratectomy
89/11/3 : 89/9/3 : 1389 /119 / IOL Master * Photorefractive keratectomy 3 2 1 2 4 Photorefractive keratectomy(prk) (IOL) :. IoL-Master.. (clinical trial) :. 30 20 35.. PRK. IOL Master ( GM300,china) IOL.
More information2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome
Quality ID #191 (NQF 0565): Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care 2018 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES:
More informationManaging residual postoperative error
Managing residual postoperative error Michael Amon Academic Teaching Hospital of St. John Vienna Sigmund Freud Private University Vienna Financial disclosure: Alcon Bausch&Lomb Bayer Johnson&Johnson Morcher
More informationALTERNATIVES TO PHAKIC IMPLANT SURGERY
Visian ICL Consent INTRODUCTION This information is being provided to you so that you can make an informed decision about having eye surgery to reduce or eliminate your nearsightedness. Only you and your
More informationAppendix Table 1. Ophthalmic drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration,
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA Appendix Table 1. Ophthalmic drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, 2002-2012 Approval Year Name Indication Pivotal Trial Design Randomized Comparator Masked Post-Approval
More informationAnterior Chamber Depth Change Following Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome; a Preliminary Study
Original Article Anterior Chamber Depth Change Following Cataract Surgery in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome; a Preliminary Study Mohammad Reza Fallah Tafti, MD; Hossein Abdollah Beiki, MD; S. Farzad Mohammadi,
More informationPediatric cataract. Nikos Kozeis MD, PhD, FICO, FEBO, MRCOphth. Surgical challenges and postoperative complications
Pediatric cataract Surgical challenges and postoperative complications Nikos Kozeis MD, PhD, FICO, FEBO, MRCOphth Consultant Paediatric Ophthalmologist Thessaloniki, Greece Pediatric Cataract 2.4 / 10000
More informationPediatric intraocular lens power calculations
REVIEW C URRENT OPINION Pediatric intraocular lens power calculations Mary A. O Hara Purpose of review To implant an appropriate intraocular lens (IOL) in a child, we must measure the eye well, calculate
More informationJournal of Ophthalmology & Clinical Research
Research Article Primary and Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation in Congenital Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Study of the Visual Outcomes Alhawsawi Abrar 1*, Alhibshi Nizar 2, Maniyar
More informationWhat is the Value of Swept Source oct Technology in Biometry? Experts discussed the IOLMaster 700 at the ESCRS ebook. Content provided by:
ebook Content provided by: What is the Value of Swept Source oct Technology in Biometry? Experts discussed the IOLMaster 700 at the ESCRS 2016 Participating experts: G. Barrett, MD, Australia; D. Chang,
More informationBiometry and intraocular lens power calculation Alexander C. Lee, Mujtaba A. Qazi and Jay S. Pepose
Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation Alexander C. Lee, Mujtaba A. Qazi and Jay S. Pepose Pepose Vision Institute, and the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University
More informationPerformance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in eyes with short and long axial lengths
Karabela et al. BMC Ophthalmology (2016) 16:96 DOI 10.1186/s12886-016-0271-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Performance of the SRK/T formula using A-Scan ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification in
More informationINTRODUCTION J. DAWCZYNSKI, E. KOENIGSDOERFFER, R. AUGSTEN, J. STROBEL. Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Jena, Jena - Germany
European Journal of Ophthalmology / Vol. 17 no. 3, 2007 / pp. 363-367 Anterior segment optical coherence tomography for evaluation of changes in anterior chamber angle and depth after intraocular lens
More informationDIRECT REFERRAL OF CATARACT PATIENTS COMMUNITY OPTOMETRIST PROTOCOL AND GUIDELINES
DIRECT REFERRAL OF CATARACT PATIENTS COMMUNITY OPTOMETRIST PROTOCOL AND GUIDELINES October 2013 Preoperative assessment History Symptoms/social history: is the patient visually affected and do they want
More informationEvolution in Visual Freedom.
Evolution in Visual Freedom. The EVO Visian ICL Advantages Many vision correction procedures promise an improved level of vision, but few vision correction alternatives offer the quality and features
More information2019 COLLECTION TYPE: MIPS CLINICAL QUALITY MEASURES (CQMS) MEASURE TYPE: Outcome High Priority
Quality ID #191 (NQF 0565): Cataracts: 20/40 or Better Visual Acuity within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care Meaningful Measure Area: Management
More informationNICE guideline Published: 26 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng77
Cataracts acts in adults: management NICE guideline Published: 26 October 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ng77 NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights (https://www.nice.org.uk/terms-and-conditions#notice-ofrights).
More informationUpdated practical intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery
REVIEW C URRENT OPINION Updated practical intraocular lens power calculation after refractive surgery Gowtham Jonna and Prabjot Channa Purpose of review Since its introduction in the 1980s, more than 40
More informationExtended Depth Of Focus IOL For Presbyopia Correction
A closer look at Extended Depth Of Focus IOL For Presbyopia Correction Abdallah K. Hassouna, MD, PhD. Professor of Ophthalmology, Ain Shams University Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon, Al Watany Eye Hospital
More informationCorneal Power Measurements Using Scheimpflug Imaging in Eyes With Prior Corneal Refractive Surgery
Corneal Power Measurements Using Scheimpflug Imaging in Eyes With Prior Corneal Refractive Surgery Jack T. Holladay, MD, MSEE, FACS; Warren E. Hill, MD, FACS; Andreas Steinmueller, MSc ABSTRACT PURPOSE:
More informationSCIENTIFIC PROGRAM. Pediatric ophthalmology- Optometry challenges (max 20 attendees)
FRIDAY, 22 SEPTEMBER 2017 WORKSHOPS (OPHTHALMICA Eye Institute) 08:30-09:00 Registration-Welcome 09:00-11:30 Workshops SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM I. Cornea & Refractive surgery (max 30 attendees) - Clinical examination
More informationInformed Consent For Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE) For the Correction of Hyperopia (Farsightedness) Or Myopia (Nearsightedness)
Informed Consent For Refractive Lens Exchange (RLE) For the Correction of Hyperopia (Farsightedness) Or Myopia (Nearsightedness) INTRODUCTION This surgery, called a refractive lens exchange or RLE, involves
More informationRetinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Myopia Using Optical Coherence Tomography
Original Article Philippine Journal of OPHTHALMOLOGY Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in Myopia Using Optical Coherence Tomography Dennis L. del Rosario, MD and Mario M. Yatco, MD University of Santo
More informationEndo Optiks. Clinical Publication Summaries
Endo Optiks Clinical Publication Summaries Effective. Safe. Simple. Four scientific studies demonstrating the proven clinical benefits of combined ECP and cataract surgery. ECP is an Effective, Safe, and
More informationThe Comparison of Central and Mean True-Net Power (Pentacam) in Calculating IOL-Power After Refractive Surgery
접수번호 :08-024 Korean Journal of Ophthalmology 2009;23:1-5 ISSN : 1011-8942 DOI : 10.3341/kjo.2009.23.1.1 The Comparison of Central and Mean True-Net Power (Pentacam) in Calculating IOL-Power After Refractive
More informationClinical Approach To Refractive Errors. Dr. Faizur Rahman Associate Professor Peshawar Medical College
Clinical Approach To Refractive Errors Dr. Faizur Rahman Associate Professor Peshawar Medical College Learning objectives By the end of this lecture the students would be able to; Correlate optics with
More informationLaser Refractive Cataract Surgery with the LenSx Laser
Laser Refractive Cataract Surgery with the LenSx Laser a Novartis company 1 LenSx Laser Important Safety Information Caution: United States Federal Law restricts this device to sale and use by or on the
More informationAnterior segment imaging
Article Date: 11/1/2016 Anterior segment imaging AS OCT vs. UBM vs. endoscope; case based approaches BY BENJAMIN BERT, MD, FACS AND BRIAN FRANCIS, MD, MS Currently, numerous imaging modalities are available
More information