NPDA RCPCH. National Paediatric Diabetes Audit. National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Report Care processes and outcomes

Transcription

1 NPDA National Paediatric Diabetes Audit National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Report Care processes and outcomes RCPCH Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Leading the way in Children s Health

2 National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Care Processes and Outcomes Report produced by the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 2018

3 Contents

4

5 Foreword I am pleased to introduce the 14th Annual Report of the National Paediatric Diabetes Audit, the seventh to be published by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. The report provides an analysis of data submitted by healthcare professionals caring for infants, children and young people with diabetes in England and Wales over 2016/17. It includes details of the prevalence of diabetes, compliance with health care checks and clinical outcomes recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and recommendations for improvements in care for the growing number of children with Type 1 or 2 diabetes. It is gratifying to see continuing national improvement in overall diabetes management, and details of new national initiatives which should catalyse further progress. However, the audit continues to show variation, with inequalities in treatment widening between children and young people at both ends of the deprivation scale, and poorer outcomes associated with nonwhite ethnicity, adolescence, female sex and living in a deprived area. It is also apparent from the audit that the growing numbers of young people with Type 2 diabetes receiving care in paediatric diabetes units are at higher risk of poorer care and disease related complications than those with Type 1 diabetes. I commend all staff working in paediatric diabetes units, managers, networks and commissioners to engage with and support the National Children and Young People s Diabetes Quality Programme being established by the RCPCH to catalyse improvements in care across England and Wales. Professor Neena Modi President, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 1

6 1. Executive summary 1.1 Background to the Audit Diabetes is a condition where the amount of glucose in the blood is too high because the body cannot use it properly. High blood glucose levels over time may cause complications associated with diabetes including damage to small and large blood vessels and nerves. Over time this can result in blindness, kidney failure, heart disease, stroke, and amputations. However, with good diabetes care and blood glucose control, the risks of complications are markedly reduced, enabling children and young people with diabetes to live a healthy, happy and longer life. The National Paediatric Diabetes Audit (NPDA) was established to compare the care and outcomes of all children and young people with diabetes receiving care from Paediatric Diabetes Units (PDUs) in England and Wales. The audit is commissioned by the Health Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP), funded by NHS England and the Welsh Government, and is managed by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. This is the 14 th annual report of the audit. 1.2 Audit aims The audit s aims are to: Monitor the incidence and prevalence of all types of diabetes amongst children and young people receiving care from a PDU in England and Wales. Establish which key care processes are being received by children and young people with diabetes. Enable benchmarking of performance against standards of care specified by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance at PDU and national level Determine the prevalence and incidence of diabetes-related complications amongst children and young people with diabetes. 1.3 Audit scope The 2016/17 NPDA included all 173 PDUs in England and Wales, and captured information on 29,153 children and young people up to the age of 24 years under the care of a consultant paediatrician. 1.4 What the audit measures The audit collects data submitted by PDUs detailing patient demographics, completion of health checks (care processes) and outcome measures of performance. 1.5 Quality standards used The health checks (care processes) audited were those recommended by NICE in their guidance for the diagnosis and management of children and young people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes (NG18, NICE, 2015). 2

7 1.6 Comparison between regions, PDUs and patients Prevalence and incidence of diabetes, associated complications, and completion of health checks (care processes) are broken down by age group, gender, type of diabetes, deprivation (using Indices of Multiple Deprivation based on patient postcode), region and country. Since gender, ethnicity, age and deprivation are known to impact upon the level of diabetes control typically achieved by patients as reflected in mean HbA1c levels, case-mix adjusted mean HbA1c levels are presented so that PDU performance can be fairly represented taking these factors into account. 1.7 Report structure This is the second year that the audit has reported the health check completion and outcomes achieved for children and young people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes separately. This executive summary contains key findings and recommendations from the audit which are presented in more detail in later chapters. For the first time, a section on admissions has been added to the Outcomes of Care chapter. 3

8 1.8 Overall National HbA1c results There have been reductions of 0.9 and 0.5 mmol/mol respectively in the national mean and median HbA1c for all children and young people being treated within a PDU in England and Wales since 2015/16. The national mean in 2016/17 was 66.9 and the median was 64.0 mmol/mol. There has been a 9 mmol/mol reduction in median HbA1c in England and Wales for all children and young people with diabetes over the last 7 years from 73 mmol/mol in 2009/10 to 64.0 mmol/mol in 2016/ Key findings: Type 1 diabetes Incidence, prevalence, and patient characteristics There were more male than female children and young people with Type 1 diabetes included within the audit. Prevalence rates of Type 1 diabetes have remained stable since 2013/14, however there have been consistent increases in prevalence amongst children aged 5-9 since 2012/13. There were 2807 children and young people aged 0-15 years old newly diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in 2016/17, giving an incidence of 25.4 per 100,000 general population. Incidence was similar amongst males (25.9 per 100,000) compared to females (24.4 per 100,000). Seasonal variation in rates of diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes was found, with higher rates in January compared to rates in the summer months. Treatment regimen Usage of insulin pumps to deliver insulin therapy in Type 1 diabetes has increased in all age groups since 2014/15, although the gap between usage amongst those living in the least and most deprived areas has widened. Younger children with Type 1 diabetes, females, those living in the least deprived areas and White ethnicity compared to Black and ethnic minority groups were more likely to be using pump therapy. Completion of health checks The proportion of children and young people, aged 12 and above, with Type 1 diabetes completing a year of care receiving all seven key healthcare checks has increased from 35.5% in 2015/16 to 43.5% in 2016/17. There was wide variation in the percentage of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes within each PDU receiving all seven essential healthcare checks, ranging from 0% to nearly 100%. Just over half (52.9%) of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes completing a full year of care over the audit period had four or more HbA1c measurements recorded. Three quarters of children and young people newly diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes had been screened for coeliac and thyroid disease. Almost three-quarters (74.1%) of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes received a psychological assessment. 6

9 Blood glucose diabetes control targets (HbA1c) The national unadjusted mean HbA1c for children and young people with Type 1 diabetes was 67.3 mmol/mol, and the median was 64.0 mmol/mol. Both represent a decrease of 1 mmol/mol compared to 2015/16. There has been an increase in the percentage of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes achieving good HbA1c levels (<58 mmol/mol) over the last year from 26.6% in 2015/16 to 28.9% in 2016/17. Over the last 7 years the percentage achieving an HbA1c <58 mmol/mol has almost doubled from 15.8% in 2010/11. There has been a reduction in the percentage of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes with poor HbA1c (>80mmol/mol) from 17.9% in 2015/16 to 16.4% in 2016/17. Over the last 7 years the percentage achieving an HbA1c >80 mmol/mol has almost halved from 28.7% in 2010/11. Older children and young people with Type 1 diabetes had poorer HbA1c levels compared to younger children. Considerable variability in HbA1c target outcomes persists between PDUs even after case-mix adjustment. Microvascular complications Consistent with results of the 2015/16 audit, Albuminuria was found in 9.7% of young people aged 12 years and above with Type 1 diabetes who were screened in the audit year. The prevalence of albuminuria in Type 1 diabetes was higher amongst those living in the most deprived areas. Retinopathy was found in 13.6% of young people aged 12 and above with Type 1 diabetes who received screening in the audit year. The risk of retinopathy increased with age and was highest amongst adolescent females. There was little or no variation in the prevalence of abnormal eye screening results by deprivation quintile. Macrovascular complications and risk factors High blood pressure (hypertension) was found in 25.8% of young people aged 12 years and older with Type 1 diabetes screened in the audit year. 23.0% of young people aged 12 years and older with Type 1 diabetes had a total blood cholesterol level exceeding the target of 5 mmol/l or less. 16.8% of children aged 0 to 11 years with Type 1 diabetes were overweight, and 16.7% were obese. These figures rose to 18.1% and 21.3%, respectively, for young people aged 12 years and above. 78.6% of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes were obese. 3.2% of young people with Type 1 diabetes aged 12 and above with a recorded smoking status were current smokers. Outcomes of psychological assessment 34.0% of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes required referral and were seen by expert CAMHS/psychology services in 2016/17 for emotional wellbeing support. 7

10 Hospital admissions Not all PDUs participating in the NPDA submitted admissions data Incidence of diabetes-related admissions was lower than reported in the NPDA Admissions Report (NPDA, 2017) which combined PDU-submitted data with data from the HES and PEDW databases. Significant variation in reported admission rates between regions suggests incompleteness of data submission amongst units who did submit admissions data. Data quality and completeness needs to improve before PDU submitted admission data can be considered representative of admission trends in England and Wales. Thyroid and coeliac disease amongst children and young people with Type 1 diabetes 4.4% of children and young people in England and Wales with Type 1 diabetes were following a gluten free diet indicative of coeliac disease, and 2.6% were receiving treatment for thyroid disease. Prevalence of both co-morbid autoimmune disorders was higher amongst females compared to males. Structured patient education Just over two thirds (72%) of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes were recorded as receiving structured patient education in 2016/17, similarly to the previous audit year. There was considerable variation in the percentages recorded as receiving structured patient education between regions and between England and Wales, with twice as many children and young people in England receiving it in England compared to Wales Key findings: Type 2 diabetes Incidence, prevalence, and patient characteristics 715 children and young people under the age of 25 with Type 2 diabetes in England and Wales were reported to the audit of whom 172 were diagnosed in the audit year, an increase of 77 from 2015/16. There were proportionally more females, those of non-white ethnicity, and those living in the most deprived areas amongst the cohort with Type 2 diabetes. Completion of health checks Completion rates for health checks were lower for children and young people with Type 2 diabetes compared to those with Type 1. The proportion of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes receiving all seven key health checks was 21.3%. Blood glucose diabetes control targets (HbA1c) The unadjusted mean and median HbA1c of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes in England and Wales receiving care in a PDU in 2016/17 were 60.2 and 52.0 mmol/mol, respectively. There were differences in HbA1c target outcomes associated with deprivation and ethnicity. In general, for both type of diabetes children and young people had poorer outcomes if they lived in a deprived area or were of non-white ethnicity. 8

11 Microvascular complications Albuminuria was found in 20.1% of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes who were screened in the audit year, just over double the percentage found in young people with Type 1 diabetes. Abnormal eye screening results were found in 5.4% of young people with Type 2 diabetes screened within the audit period, compared to 13.8 % of children and young people with Type 1. Macrovascular complications and risk factors Hypertension was found in 45.6% of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes, a markedly higher prevalence compared to those with Type 1 diabetes. 78.6% of children and young people with Type 2 diabetes were obese. 4.5% of young people with Type 2 diabetes aged 12 and above with a recorded smoking status were current smokers. Outcomes of psychological assessment Over a third (37.4%) of those with Type 2 diabetes required referral and were seen by expert CAMHS/psychology services in 2016/17 for emotional wellbeing support. Structured patient education Only half (49.4%) of those with Type 2 diabetes were recorded as receiving structured patient education, a reduction of 8.4% since 2015/16. 9

12 1.11 Summary of recommendations Prevalence and incidence Healthcare professionals caring for children with diabetes and commissioners of paediatric diabetes services need to be aware of the gender, ethnic and deprivation differences between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Commissioners of paediatric diabetes services need to be aware of their local casemix in terms of ethnicity and deprivation and fund care according to healthcare needs. PDUs should ensure the collection and submission of accurate ethnicity data. The not stated category appears to be over represented in the dataset. This category set out in the Health and Social Care Dataset Change Notice (DSCN) (2008) refers to cases where the patient has been asked, and has either declined or has a genuine inability to choose an ethnic category. It should not be used to define unknown ethnicity status. Healthcare professionals and commissioners need to be aware of the seasonal variation in presentation of Type 1 diabetes which will cause particular stresses in the winter months, including additional school support. Completion of health checks Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Ensure children and young people with diabetes are receiving the key essential healthcare checks specific to their diabetes type and identify barriers to this annual provision and develop quality improvement initiatives to mitigate these. Be aware that completion rates of healthcare checks tend to be higher amongst children and young people with Type 1 diabetes compared to those with Type 2 diabetes, and attempt to improve engagement with children and young people with Type 2 diabetes to ensure that these checks are carried out annually. Ensure all children and young people with diabetes receive four or more HbA1c measurements per annum and these are utilised as part of diabetes management. Ensure that screening for thyroid and coeliac disease takes place at diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes. Caution young people with diabetes against smoking as they have a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. These discussions should be included in their on-going education programme. Screen for psychological co-morbidities in children and young people with diabetes such as eating disorders, anxiety, and depression so that treatment strategies can be employed to improve emotional wellbeing. Structured education Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Ensure that all children and young people with diabetes are provided with an ongoing programme of structured education from diagnosis, tailored to their individual needs. Evaluate their structured education programmes and review them regularly to ensure that they are meeting the needs of the children, young people and families they are targeted at. 10

13 Commissioners should: Ensure that service providers are delivering suitable structured ongoing education programmes to all stakeholders involved in the care of children and young people with diabetes including parents and other family members, and schools and education providers. The National Children and Young People s Diabetes Network should: Utilise regional and national structured patient education resources, many of which are already available as part of the National Network s sharing strategy ( including Goals of Diabetes Education, or SEREN in Wales. Such initiatives should be put into action to avoid wide variability in treatment target outcomes and ensure every child and young person with diabetes and their family receives optimal self-management education that is age and maturity appropriate, delivered by trained educators and provided in a family centred way (Waldron & Campbell, 2014). Programmes should be designed by experienced diabetes educators (Campbell & Waldron, 2013). Blood glucose diabetes control targets (HbA1c) Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Aim for all children to achieve the HbA1c target set by NICE (individualised for the child) from diagnosis with emphasis on self-management education and psychological support. Actively work towards improving the blood glucose levels of children and young people that are currently out of target range. Pay particular attention to the care needs of the vulnerable subgroup with persistently high HbA1c levels. Appropriate engagement, education, technology and psychosocial support for this subgroup is paramount so that they are not lost to follow up and are helped as individuals to improve their diabetes management. Provide each child with an individualised care plan to achieve the best possible level of HbA1c given the many reasons for the gradual increase of HbA1c with duration of diabetes. Be aware of the socioeconomic and patient demographic factors associated with poorer diabetes management, and adapt communications and structured education provision to be able to meet the different needs of vulnerable subgroups. Commissioners should: Support Quality Improvement strategies aimed at improving diabetes management. Resource providers of paediatric diabetes care to promote and provide education and self-management strategies leading to improved HbA1c. Be aware of the socioeconomic and patient demographic factors associated with poorer diabetes management, and ensure services catering to higher percentages of for children and young people from vulnerable subgroups are resourced sufficiently to meet their needs. Be aware of the cultural diversity amongst the paediatric diabetes population and ensure community groups and schools are sufficiently aware and trained to help young people to further improvements in diabetes control especially amongst vulnerable subgroup with an HbA1c >80 mmol/mol. 11

14 Diabetes complications and risk factors Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Prioritise improving diabetes management to reduce the lifetime risk of developing complications. Be aware of the significantly higher prevalence of albuminuria and hypertension amongst children and young people with Type 2 diabetes compared to those with Type 1. Submit a complete dataset including admissions data to enable benchmarking and associated QI activity around admission avoidance. Commissioners should: Ensure that PDUs are resourced so that children and young people with diabetes have access to individually tailored dietetic and psychological support to promote a healthy diet and active lifestyle. Please refer to the NPDA Hospital Admissions Report (RCPCH, 2017) for recommendations for avoidance of diabetes-related admissions. Psychological outcomes Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Be aware of the complex psychological needs of children and young people with diabetes, and work with commissioners, local health boards and others involved in commissioning services to ensure that care pathways are in place that enable all children and young people with diabetes to be reviewed by an expert psychologist and/or CAMHS when necessary. The National Children and Young People s Diabetes Network should: Develop regional and/or national agreement on the best way to utilise expert psychologists in the clinical setting. Treatment regimen Multidisciplinary paediatric diabetes teams should: Improve the completeness of the recording and submission of treatment regimen data for children and young people with both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Be aware of deprivation gradients associated with choice of insulin regimen. Regions/Commissioners should: Ensure that PDUs have appropriate IT facilities to record treatment regimens in children and young people with diabetes. Allow the usage of treatment regimens tailored to suit the individual needs of the patient to provide the best possible diabetes control in line with local prescribing policy and in keeping with NICE (2015) guidance, and acknowledge and address barriers to doing so. 12

15 1.12 Conclusion The results of this 2016/17 audit provide justification both for celebration and for continuing focus on improving the diabetes care of children and young people with diabetes in England and Wales. The key successes identified include the continuing downward trend in National HbA1c, and increases in the percentages of children and young people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes receiving recommended health checks. However, the audit continues to identify variation in care and outcomes at unit, regional, and national level. Poorer outcomes continue to be associated with non-white ethnicity, adolescence, female gender, and living in a deprived area. Inequalities in treatment deprivation observed previously were also shown to be widening, with children and young people in the least deprived areas being even more likely to be using an insulin pump compared to those in the most deprived areas than in previous audit cycles. Patient and PDU factors responsible for the inequalities identified by the audit must be explored and addressed as part of local and national improvement strategies to improve diabetes management and outcomes. 13

16 2. Case studies 2.1 Teamwork in focus: Applying the learning from improved national HbA1c results in Sweden within England and Wales In 2012, Hanberger, Samuelsson, Berterö and Ludvigsson published the results of an analysis of team questionnaire data collected from all paediatric diabetes units (PDUs) in Sweden, which compared the responses given by the five PDUs with the best HbA1c outcomes with those from the five least well performing PDUs. Factors associated with better HbA1c outcomes included: Clear, consistent messages to children and young people with diabetes and their parents/carers regarding diet, HbA1c target, physical activity, treatment of hypoglycaemia and the importance of structure in everyday life Devoted team members A positive attitude within the team An explicit, lower HbA1c target value Perception of a well-functioning team By contrast, factors associated with higher HbA1c results included: Giving vague or inconsistent messages to children and young people with diabetes and their parents/carers Lack of staff resources Lack of cooperation within the team Lack of treatment guidelines The results of this study fed into an 18-month quality improvement programme: a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) for paediatric diabetes teams (Swediabkids IQ; Peterson, Hanberger, Åkesson, Bojestig, Andersson Gäre & Samuelsson, 2014) involving 12 PDUs caring for 30% of children and young people with diabetes in Sweden. Each team identified treatment targets, areas needing improvement, and action plans, with the main outcome of focus being the PDUs mean HbA1c level. Analysis showed that PDUs participating in the programme reduced their mean HbA1c value by 3.7 mmol/mol, over double the improvement achieved by non-participating centres over the same period (1.7mmol/mol). Two further rounds of the collaborative were then completed. In the 36 months between the start of the first collaborative and end of the second, the national mean HbA1c decreased by 4.9 mmol/mol to 57.7mmol/mol, with QIC participation associated with significantly decreased mean HbA1c compared to non-participation, and evidence of a spillover effect into non-participating units (Åkesson, Peterson, Hanas & Hanberger, 2016). Change factors identified were improved guidelines, appointment planning, improving patient information, improving teamwork, active use of audit data, and health promotion activities. By 2016, after three rounds of the collaborative including PDUs caring for ~ 90% of all children and young people with diabetes, the national mean was reduced to 56.9 mmol/mol (Swediabkids, 2017). Representatives from the NPDA, the National Children and Young People s network and RCPCH visited the team behind the Swediabkids IQ in February 2017 to gain a better understanding of the principles and methodology behind the work and to consider whether they could apply in England and Wales. Inspired and encouraged by the Swedish team s approach and results, the RCPCH is piloting and developing a model for a comprehensive quality improvement programme which, if funded beyond the pilot, will enable every PDU in England and Wales to participate in training and ongoing support, using 14

17 proven Quality Improvement methodology, to make tangible improvements in their outcomes for children with diabetes. This approach, modelled on the Swedish project, aims to: Engage with PDUs (up to 100 individual participants) in a coordinated, comprehensive 9- month QI training programme Equip programme participants with skills needed to design and implement change projects in their units and to sustain them over time Develop a collaborative of PDUs working together throughout the project duration to share learning and outcomes and support each other s development Develop an online platform for sharing materials and outputs between the units and the RCPCH team Evaluate the impact the pilot had on participating teams and establish whether it could be replicated as part of an ongoing programme of work Whilst applying Quality Improvement methodology, the programme will put special emphasis on training in team development, individual and group leadership and influencing strategies, in recognition of the fact that lasting success depends not on individuals driving a project, but high performing teams supported by management. The programme will include four training and sharing events attended by the entire multidisciplinary team from each participating unit. The pilot collaborative launched in November 2017 and will complete in July Improving health check completion rates Nearly all patients over the age of 12 with Type 1 diabetes received all seven key care processes at West Middlesex Hospital in 2016/7 and 2015/16, a dramatic improvement compared to the percentage recorded in 2014/15. We attribute this improvement to the following factors: 1. We obtained more resources with the help of our CCG GP representative Dr Raquel Delgado. This included one full time admin support, another full-time paediatric diabetes nurse specialist, one extra consultant, and increased dietetic and psychology sessions 2. The full-time admin support was the main person who put in all the data into our Twinkle database, which the rest of the team also had training to use 3. Working together as a team from the same office helped in communicating our vision and goal 4. Flexibility of conducting extra clinics opportunistically to accommodate the patients at risk of not completing the care process before the deadline 5. As a group, we review 3 monthly where we are in completing the care processes and this has helped us in focussing our resources Dr Jayanti Rangasami Paediatric Consultant West Middlesex University Hospital 15

18 2.3 Improving admission data quality As a team, we make sure that whoever is the first to hear of an admission s the entire team. Included on the distribution list is our data manager (he helps pull data for BPT and NPDA). I file these s in my own separate folder. Our data manager pulls admission information from the Twinkle database quarterly. He cross-checks with the coding department for any admissions which have not been brought to our attention, such as those with unrelated illness or emergency surgery, with diabetes as a comorbidity. This list is then sent to me. The data is never complete the first time as I always identify gaps. We usually go back and forth several times for repeated extractions to build up the full picture. I present the information as an entire dataset to the best of my knowledge, but the process is certainly not seamless, and very time consuming. One of my challenges is to try and raise awareness of how important the issue is, and the implications of the data, to encourage appropriate information sharing. Children's Emergency Department attendances are often missed because they do not count as 'admissions' but capturing these in their entirety could shed light on preventative measures, and safety netting. I have been looking at lengths of DKA admissions in newly diagnosed patients, and overall length of stays and how an increase in our nursing hours to deliver initial essential education has impacted on bed occupancy. As a Trust we are under pressure to keep length of stay to a minimum, and targets such as carbohydrate counting from diagnosis can delay discharge. Dissecting accurate admissions data can be a useful way to detect patterns and themes that need addressing. The data can help us see where we need more resource, and when. Dr. Dita Aswani Consultant Paediatrician Lead for Paediatric Diabetes Derbyshire Children's Hospital 16

19 3. Introduction The NPDA is delivered by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) and has been reporting for 14 years. Data is submitted by healthcare professionals in all Paediatric Diabetes Units (PDUs) in England and Wales about the care received by the children and young people with diabetes using their service. The effectiveness of diabetes care is measured against NICE guidelines and includes treatment targets, health checks, patient education, psychological wellbeing, and assessment of diabetes related complications including acute hospital admissions, all of which are vital to monitoring and improving the long-term health and wellbeing of children and young people with diabetes. All 173 PDUs in England and Wales participated in the 2016/17 audit, capturing information on 29,153 children and young people with diabetes up to the age of 24 years remaining in paediatric care. The vast majority (95.1%) of the children and young people in the audit had Type 1 diabetes. The NPDA is designed to measure and motivate change at local, regional and national levels across England and Wales. It also has a role in assuring patient safety, as data from the audit are used to inform hospital inspections by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in England. The audit encourages everyone with an interest in improving the lives of children and young people with diabetes to work together including healthcare managers, commissioners, children, young people, and their families as well as all members of the multi-disciplinary team. In the last 3 years, NPDA outcome data have also been benchmarked against certain other European, American and Australasian countries, providing insights into areas where international comparisons can drive improvements (McKnight et al., 2015; Maahs et al., 2015; Sherr et al., 2016) Past NPDA reports have recognised wide variation in the quality of care and outcomes achieved by PDUs in England and Wales. The audit provides an essential baseline for measuring PDU, regional, commissioning group and national performance, and enables benchmarking of year on year progress. These results support efforts within PDUs, regions and at a national level to understand variability, and by doing so focus efforts to improve care within centres performing less well, which will ultimately contribute to overall national improvement. For the seventh year there have been continued improvements in overall blood glucose levels reflected in a reduction in HbA1c. HbA1c is highly associated with risk of acute and chronic complications of the disease. Although it may be early to draw firm conclusions, for the first time, this year, in England and Wales the NPDA is beginning to demonstrate reductions in the prevalence of risk factors associated with the development of macrovascular disease in children and young people with Type 1 diabetes which in the long term will be reflected in a reduction in disease burden on patients, families and the NHS. 3.1 Commissioning The NPDA is commissioned by the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). HQIP is led by a consortium of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, the Royal College of Nursing and National Voices. Its aim is to promote quality improvement in patient outcomes, and in particular, to increase the impact that clinical audit, outcome review programmes and registries have on healthcare quality in England and Wales. HQIP holds the contract to commission, manage and develop the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme (NCAPOP), comprising around 40 projects covering care provided to people with a wide range of medical, surgical and mental health conditions. The programme is funded by NHS England, the Welsh Government and, with some individual projects, other devolved administrations and crown dependencies. 17

20 3.2 Background Diabetes mellitus occurs when blood glucose levels are elevated because the body is unable to metabolise it. The UK has the largest prevalence of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes in Europe (Lacobucci, 2013). Complications associated with suboptimal diabetes management include damage to small and large blood vessels and nerves which over time can result in blindness, kidney failure, heart disease, stroke, and amputations. With good diabetes care and blood glucose management, the risks of complications are reduced, enabling children and young people to enjoy a healthy and longer life. Diabetes care is complex and requires collaboration between healthcare professionals, children and young people and their families, carers and friends. Good quality care requires adequate resources and training of the workforce (Campbell & Waldron, 2013) to support the medical, emotional and psychological needs of children, young people and their families. In addition, families need ongoing and appropriate age-related structured patient education on self-management to provide knowledge, skills and competencies to manage their diabetes on a daily basis (Waldron & Campbell, 2014). Ensuring that patients and families are provided with a thorough understanding of the targets associated with good diabetes management and the need for regular health checks to prevent complications is an essential part of high quality care (NICE, 2015). 3.3 NPDA outputs and collaborations The NPDA produces the following reports, all of which can be viewed and downloaded from The Care Processes and Outcomes Report produced annually compares results across England (by region) and Wales. A lay summary of the above specifically designed for patients and families will be made available online and in print shortly following the release of the main report. Individualised unit, region and CCG/Local Health Board level reports provide details of performance at each level. These are published online shortly following publication of the Care Processes and Outcomes Report. The online reporting tool enables comparison between specific units or regions, and contains outlier information. The NPDA Hospital Admissions and Complications Report measures rates of admission to hospital for complications such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hypoglycaemia. The most recent report (RCPCH, 2017) combined admissions data submitted by PDUs with data extracted from the Hospital Episode Statistics in England (HES) and the Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) to identify trends in admissions between 2012/ /15. Patient Related Experience Measure (PREM) reports provide each unit with feedback from questionnaires completed by parents and patients who use their service. The most recent online PREM survey closed in April 2016, and new PREMS are being piloted in selected units in 2018 before wider roll out. The NPDA collaborates with the National Diabetes Audit (NDA) for adults to produce a National Diabetes Transition Audit, tracking the care of young people with diabetes during the transition from paediatric diabetes services to adult diabetes services. The most recent report was published in 2017 (NHS Digital, 2017). The NPDA collaborates with national and international researchers to benchmark UK diabetes outcomes and co-morbidities. Data from the NPDA are used to provide data to justify PDUs in England receiving the Best Practice Tariff (Randell, 2012). 18

21 3.4 Scope of the 2016/17 NPDA report The NPDA analyses data provided by healthcare professionals working in PDUs that are defined as clinics, hospital wards, hospital departments and any other hospital unit diagnosing and treating children and young people with diabetes mellitus in England and Wales. This 2016/17 report covers the health checks (care processes) and outcomes for children and young people with diabetes who have attended PDUs during the period from 1st April 2016 through to 31st March Whilst it is important to acknowledge improvements in diabetes care made during this period, this audit also aims to highlight deficiencies in care and make specific recommendations to commissioners of health services, regional diabetes networks, and PDUs to address the quality of recording of data relating to patient care and outcomes and the clear inequalities in outcomes across England and Wales. Key audit questions The report aims to address a series of questions relating to paediatric diabetes care, which include: What proportion of children and young people with diabetes are reported to be receiving key age-specific processes of diabetes care, as recommended by NICE? How many achieve outcome measures within specified treatment targets? Are children and young people with diabetes demonstrating evidence of small vessel disease (microvascular) and/or abnormal risk factors associated with large vessel disease (macrovascular) prior to transition into adult services? 3.5 Data completeness Over the seven years that the RCPCH has been responsible for delivering the NPDA, there has been a steady improvement in both the quality and completeness of data submitted. However, there remains considerable variability across PDUs with respect to their ability to resource adequate IT systems to collect and submit accurate and complete data during the audit year. NPDA results are utilised by commissioners to measure performance and PDUs have been urged to improve the completeness of their record-keeping and data completeness to ensure it reflects their practice. The 2016/17 audit is the second time that a comprehensive data completeness report was available upon upload of audit data, enabling detection of missing data. It was also the second year that the NPDA asked clinical leads at each unit to provide a signature to confirm the completeness and accuracy of their data submission. It is expected that these developments will have had an impact on the overall quality of data submitted to the NPDA. For the first time, this report includes analysis of admissions data submitted by PDUs. This has not been included in previous reports as the data were considered to be of questionable quality and completeness. This was confirmed by comparison of admissions identified in both the NPDA, HES and PEDW datasets as part of the analysis for the NPDA Hospital Admissions Report (RCPCH, 2017), which found that only 32.3% of all admissions were found in both the NPDA submitted data and either the HES or PEDW dataset. All but 15 of the 173 PDUs submitted admissions data in 2016/17. It is therefore not possible to use these data to calculate representative figures for numbers of diabetes-related admissions in England and Wales, or to base any recommendations on these data. However, a small amount of admissions data have been presented in order to stimulate focus on its submission, and to enable comparison with admission trends identified previously using a combined NPDA, HES and PEDW dataset. The NPDA will work with PDUs over the next audit cycle to identify and resolve barriers to the submission of complete and good quality admissions data. 19

22 4. Patient characteristics, prevalence and incidence 4.1 Audit cohort A total of 29,153 children and young people with diabetes were included in the 2016/17 audit, an increase of 714 since the 2015/16 audit. Table 1: Number of children and young people with diabetes included in the audit by age and type of diabetes, 2016/ years 5 9 years years years years Total (% of cohort) Type 1 Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Type 2 Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (95.1) * * 715 (2.5) Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes 21** (0.6) Monogenic types of diabetes (0.6) Other specified diabetes mellitus ** 172 (0.6) Not specified diabetes mellitus (0.6) Missing type of diabetes * * * (0.1) indicates a number less than 5 which has been suppressed. **Column has been combined to mask a number < 5 that could be identifiable from the total. + The NPDA recognises that transition to adult diabetes services usually starts in a patient s late teenage years. The numbers presented in these columns represents the number still receiving care from a PDU and may not necessarily represent the total number of young people with diabetes in these age groups in England and Wales. 20

23 4.2 Characteristics of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes Age and gender Figure 1 shows the number of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes reported to the audit by age in whole years at the beginning of the audit period. Figure 1: Numbers of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes included in the NPDA by age and gender, Number of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes < Male Female Number of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes Male Female 21

24 4.2.2 Location Table 2 shows the distribution of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes by country, regional network and age category. Table 2: Number of children and young people included in the audit with Type 1 diabetes by country, region and age, 2016/17 (based on PDU location) 0-4 years 5-9 years years years years Total aged <20 (% of total <20) England and Wales (100%) England (94.8%) Wales (5.2%) East of England * 3090 (11.1%) East Midlands (6.7%) London and South East * 6280 (22.7%) North East and North Cumbria * 1549 (5.6%) North West (12.5) South Central (8.7%) South West (7.7%) West Midlands * 2817 (10.2%) Yorkshire and the Humber * 2672 (9.6%) * indicates a number less than 5 which has been suppressed 22

25 4.2.3 Ethnicity Prevalence of disease per ethnic group can be calculated using denominators from 2011 census data. Table 3 shows the ethnicity of the children and young people with Type 1 diabetes. Since 11.8% of patients do not have a stated ethnicity recorded, percentages have also been calculated excluding this category to allow comparison of ethnic category percentages to the 2011 census data, which does not contain a not stated category. There is no difference in the ethnicity of children with Type 1 diabetes compared to the background population. Table 3: Ethnic group of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes England and Wales, 2016/17 Ethnic category Number Percentage of total sample Percentage of total with stated ethnicity* Percentage of population in 2011 England and Wales Census White % 85.6% 86.0% Mixed % 2.9% 2.2% Asian % 5.8% 7.5% Black % 3.9% 3.3% Other % 1.7% 1.0% Not stated % - - Unallocated ethnic group % - - * Ethnicity percentages have been calculated without the not stated and unallocated groups to allow comparison to 2011 census data Deprivation Table 4 shows the breakdown of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes by deprivation quintile, derived from patient postcode using multiple indices of deprivation data for England (IMD, 2016) and Wales (WIMD, 2015). There is similar prevalence across all quintiles. Table 4: Number of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes by deprivation quintile, 2016/17 Deprivation quintile Number Percentage of total sample Most deprived % 2nd most deprived % 3rd most deprived % 2nd least deprived % Least deprived % Missing deprivation data % 23

26 4.3 Prevalence and incidence of Type 1 diabetes Prevalence Prevalence is calculated for children and young people aged 15 and below since transition to adult services typically occurs from this age onwards. In 2016/17 the prevalence of Type 1 diabetes in children and young people aged 0 to 15 years old in England and Wales was per 100,000 of the general population; slightly higher among males (196.1 per 100,000) compared to females (192.2 per 100,000). Figure 2 shows the prevalence rates across the last four audit years. Figure 2: Prevalence of Type 1 diabetes per 100,000 general population by age and gender in England and Wales, 2013/14 to 2016/ / / / /17 Prevalene per 100,000 general population in each age group Males Females All Incidence In 2016/17 there were 2807 children and young people aged 0 to 15 years old newly diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in England and Wales, giving an incidence of 25.4 per 100,000 general population within this age group. Figure 3 shows that overall, incidence rates have varied since 2012/13, with increasing incidence amongst males and females aged

27 Figure 3: Incidence of Type 1 diabetes per 100,000 general population by age group and gender, 2012/ / /13* 2013/ / / /17 Incidence per 100,000 general population in each age group Males Females All * Overall incidence was not reported in the 2012/13 audit year Month of diagnosis Figure 4 shows the number and percentage, respectively, of children and young people of all ages diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes within each month, for those diagnosed within and prior to the 2016/17 audit year. The red line indicates the percentage that would be diagnosed each month if new cases were distributed equally throughout the year (8.3%). Figure 4: Percentage of children and young people diagnosed in 2016/17 or within previous audit years by month of diagnosis Percentage of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes diagnosed in each audit month Percentage diagnosed in 2016/17 (N=2938) Percentage diagnosed pre 2016/17 (N=24708) Month of diagnosis 25

28 Figure 5 shows the number and percentages of all children and young people with Type 1 diabetes included in the 2016/17 audit diagnosed within each month by school age. The red line indicates the percentage that would be diagnosed each month if new cases were distributed equally throughout the year (8.3%). Figure 5: Percentage of children and young people with Type 1 diabetes included in the 2016/17 audit diagnosed within each month Percentage of children and young people diagnosed in each audit month 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% Age group 0-4 (n= 1653) Age group 5-11 (n= 9950) Age group (n= 12602) 0% Month of diagnosis Figures 4 and 5 show a trend for increased rates of diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes in January and lower rates in the summer months. 26