Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction
|
|
- Juliet Green
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Accepted Manuscript Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD Rickard Ljung, MD, PHD Magnus Johansson, MD, PHD Martin J. Holzmann, MD, PHD PII: S (14) DOI: /j.jacc Reference: JAC To appear in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology Received Date: 4 March 2014 Revised Date: 18 March 2014 Accepted Date: 19 March 2014 Please cite this article as: Bandstein N, Ljung R, Johansson M, Holzmann MJ, Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Journal of the American College of Cardiology (2014), doi: /j.jacc This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
2 Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD,* Rickard Ljung, MD, PHD, Magnus Johansson, MD, PHD,* Martin J. Holzmann, MD, PHD* From the *Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge; Department of Internal Medicine, and Unit of Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, all in Stockholm, Sweden. Short title: Undetectable Troponins and Risk of MI Financial support: none Disclosures: none Acknowledgements: We wish to express our gratitude to Fredrik Mattsson at FM Statistikkonsult for his help with data management and statistical analyses. Address for correspondence: Dr. Martin J. Holzmann, Department of Emergency Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 14186, Stockholm, Sweden. Telephone: adress: martin.holzmann@karolinska.se 1
3 Abstract Objectives To evaluate if an undetectable (< 5 ng/l) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-ctnt) level, and an electrocardiogram (ECG) without signs of ischemia can rule out myocardial infarction (MI) in the emergency department (ED). Background Chest pain is a common symptom often associated with benign conditions, but may be a sign of MI. Since there is no rapid way to rule out MI many patients are admitted to hospital. Methods All patients who sought medical attention for chest pain, and had at least one hs-ctnt analyzed, during two years at the Karolinska university hospital, Stockholm, Sweden were included. We calculated the negative predictive values of an undetectable hs-ctnt, and ECG without ischemia, for MI and death within 30 days. Results We included 14,636 patients of whom 8,907 (61%) had an intial hs-ctnt of < 5 ng/l, 21% had 5 to 14 ng/l, and 18% had > 14 ng/l. During 30 days of follow-up 39 (0.44%) patients with undetectable hs-ctnt had a MI, of whom 15 (0.17%) had no ischemic ECG changes. The negative predictive value for MI within 30 days in patients with undetectable hs-ctnt, and no ischemic ECG changes was 99.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) ). The negative predictive value for death was 100% (95% CI ). Conclusions All patients with chest pain who have an initial hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and no signs of ischemia on ECG have a minimal risk of MI or death within 30 days and can be safely discharged directly from the ED. Keyword: Chest pain, Myocardial infarction, High-sensitivity troponin, Emergency department Abbreviations: hs-ctnt = high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T ECG = electrocardiogram MI = myocardial infarction ED = emergency department CI = confidence interval egfr = estimated glomerular filtration rate STEMI = ST-elevation myocardial infarction NSTEMI = non ST-elevation myocardial infarction PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention 2
4 Introduction Chest pain is the cardinal symptom of myocardial infarction (MI), and it is one of the most common complaints of patients seeking medical attention in the emergency department (ED), accounting for an estimated 15 to 20 million ED visits per year in Europe and the United States (1-3). Although chest pain is often merely a sign of a completely benign condition, it may indicate that the patient is suffering from a life-threatening disease. As many as 2% of patients with MI are inadvertently discharged directly from the ED, which is associated with a doubling of the risk of death (4). Current guidelines therefore recommend that patients with chest pain who have normal clinical findings, electrocardiograms (ECG), and cardiac injury markers in the ED should have biomarker testing repeated 3-6 h after presentation (2). Commonly this means that the patient is admitted to hospital for further evaluation. However, only 10 to 20% of patients admitted for chest pain are diagnosed with MI during the hospitalization (4-6). If MI can be ruled out safely and efficiently, without serial testing, or prolonged observation, then hospital admissions, ED overcrowding, and costs could be reduced. Several clinical decision rules have been developed to safely and efficiently exclude MI, which include assessment of pretest probability, biomarker levels, and ECG findings (6-9). However, these algorithms all include serial testing of biomarkers, which may delay patient discharge from the ED. Recently, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-ctnt) has been introduced as a highly sensitive, and early biomarker of myocardial damage (10). In two prospective cohorts of patients admitted to hospital for chest pain undetectable hs-ctnt was found to have a very high negative predictive value for MI (5,11). 3
5 We hypothesized that all patients with chest pain who have an initial hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and no signs of ischemia on ECG have a minimal risk of MI or death within 30 days and can be safely discharged directly from the ED. Methods Study population Study population. This study included all patients aged 25 years who sought medical attention for chest pain in the ED, and had at least one hs-ctnt level measured while in the ED, at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden from December 10, 2010 to December 31, This hospital is located at two sites that are 22 km apart (Huddinge and Solna), and has a total capacity of 1610 beds. The annual number of patients presenting to the adult ED is about 77,000 in Huddinge and 70,000 in Solna. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are available at Huddinge during office hours, and at all times at Solna. Patients who presented to the ED were identified from the hospitals register of patients. Archived laboratory data were retrieved to determine which patients had at least one hs-ctnt level measured while in the ED. Serum creatinine levels measured in the ED were retrieved to assess renal function, and the time spent in the ED was recorded. The patient data were then sent to the National Board of Health and Welfare to obtain data from the Swedish National Patient Register (12) which includes all patients hospitalized in Sweden, regarding prior hospitalizations for MI, stroke, heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to determine the background characteristics of the study population. Information about current medications was retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (13). The data were then anonymized and returned to the investigators. Diabetes mellitus was defined as ongoing treatment with any hypoglycemic agent. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (egfr) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease 4
6 Epidemiology Collaboration formula. Chronic kidney disease was defined as an egfr of <60 ml/min/1.73 m 2. The study protocol complied with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm. The main group of patients studied were those with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l (undetectable) measured in the ED, combined with no ST changes indicating myocardial ischemia on ECG (2). Patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and initial ECG changes indicating MI were excluded from further analysis. In patients with a first hs-ctnt level of 5 ng/l, the ECGs were not reviewed. The hs-ctnt levels were analyzed using the Elecsys 2010 system (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), which has been available at Karolinska University Hospital since December 10, This method has a detection limit of 2 ng/l, a 99th-percentile cutoff point of 14 ng/l, and a coefficient of variation of <10% at 13 ng/l (14). Patients were categorized into three goups according to the first hs-ctnt level: <5 ng/l, 5 to 14 ng/l, and >14 ng/l. Outcome and follow-up. The primary outcome was fatal or non-fatal type 1 MI, which is defined as MI related to atherosclerotic plaque rupture, fissuring, or erosion which leads to an intraluminal thrombus formation resulting in myocardial ischemia (2), within 30 days of the ED visit. The secondary outomes were MI within 180 days and 365 days of the ED visit, and all-cause mortality within 30, 180 and 365 days of the ED visit. In patients with a first hsctnt level of <5 ng/l, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was calculated for admitted patients compared with patients discharged directly from the ED. Patients were followed from the time of the first hs-ctnt level until 30, 90 or 365 days after the ED visit. Data regarding subsequent diagnosis of MI, hospitalizations, discharge diagnoses other than MI, and length of hospital stay were obtained from the Swedish National Patient Register. Causes of death were obtained from the Cause-of-Death Register, which includes all individuals who are residing in Sweden at the time of their death. 5
7 Review of ECGs and diagnoses of MI. All patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and a diagnosis of MI within 30 days were identified, and their ECGs were retrieved from the medical records. ECGs were also retrieved for two control patients per case from the cohort of patients who visited the ED because of chest pain, matched for age, sex, and the first hsctnt level, who were not diagnosed with MI within 30 days. Two independent senior cardiologists, blinded to the study protocol, were asked to review the ECGs and assess whether there was new ST elevation in two contiguous leads with cut-points of 0.1 mv in all leads except for in leads V 2 -V 3 where 0.2 mv in men 40 years of age, and 0.25 mv in men <40 years of age, and 0.15 mv in women were applied; or if there were significant ST depression defined as a horizontal or down-sloping ST segment 0.05 mv in two contiguous leads; or if there was a left-bundle branch block present which was new compared with previous ECGs, if there were any to compare with (2). The only data available to the senior cardiologists were the age and sex of each patient, and that the main complaint was chest pain. A third senior cardiologist (M.J.H.) also assessed all the ECGs, and if there was disagreement between the assessments by the two independent cardiologists, the assessment by M.J.H. was used for the analyses. At a later stage, the records of all patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l were reviewed to determine whether they met the criteria for MI within 30 days according to troponin levels, other laboratory values, coronary angiography findings, echocardiography findings, and ECG findings. Statistical analyses We stratified patients into three groups according to level of hs-ctnt (<5, 5 to 14 and >14 ng/l) and calculated the absolute risks, negative predictive values and incidence rates with 95 % confidence intervals for myocardial infarction and death with a follow-up of 30, 180 and 365 days. The first hs-ctnt level recorded from December 10, 2010 to December 31, 2012 was the starting point of the follow up for each patient. Cox proportional hazards model was 6
8 used to calculate hazard ratio and 95 % confidence interval for the potential association between the exposure not admitted (reference admitted) and the outcome time to death adjusted for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, prior MI and egfr. The data management and the calculations for absolute risks, negative predictive values and incidence rates were conducted using World Programming System, version 3.0 (World Programming Ltd., Hampshire, United Kingdom). Cox proportional hazards model was performed using R version (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results Patient characteristics. There were a total of 330,821 visits to the adult ED at Karolinska University Hospital during the study period (Figure 1). Chest pain was the second most common reason for visiting the ED, accounting for 15,549 (4.7%) of patients, of which 14,636 were aged >25 years and had at least one hs-ctnt level measured. Laboratory results showed that 61% of these patients had a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, 21% had a first hsctnt level of 5 to 14 ng/l, and 18% had a first hs-ctnt level of >14 ng/l (Table 1). Patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l were younger; less likely to have chronic kidney disease, chronic cardiovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus; and less likely to be taking medication for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (Table 1). With increasing levels of hsctnt patients were older, more often men, and had more comorbidities. Admissions, second hs-ctnt levels and discharge diagnoses. A total of 5,418 (37%) patients were admitted to hospital, of whom 35% had a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l (Table 2 and Figure 1). The hospitalization rate was 21% in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, 44% in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of 5 to 14 ng/l, and 82% in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of >14 ng/l (Table 2). Among patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, 1,704 (89%) had a second hs-ctnt level measured, which was <5 ng/l in 1362 (90%) patients, 5 to 14 ng/l in 111 (7.3%) patients, and >14 ng/l in 44 (3.0%) patients. Patients with 7
9 a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and no MI within 30 days were hospitalized for a total of 3,262 days, with a mean duration of hospital stay of 1.5 ± 3.0 days, and 1482 (77%) of these patients were discharged on the same or next day. The most common discharge diagnoses in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l were nonspecific chest pain (50.0%), atrial fibrillation or supraventricular tachycardia (5.6%), and angina (5.1%) (Table 3). A diagnosis of MI was unusual (2.0%) in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, but was more common with higher hs-ctnt levels, reaching 30% in patients with a first hs-ctnt level of >14 ng/l (Table 3). Among patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, the time spent in the ED was similar for those who were discharged compared with those who were hospitalized, 208 (±101) minutes vs. 203 (±111) minutes. Time in the ED in relation to level of troponin and final diagnosis of MI is described in Table 1, supplemental material. Myocardial infarction and death. A total of 746 (14%) patients were discharged from the index hospitalization with a diagnosis of MI. Forty-four patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l were diagnosed with MI within 30 days. Two of these patients had a periprocedural MI and three did not meet the current criteria for MI (2). These five patients were excluded from further analysis. Twenty-four of the remaining patients had significant ECG changes, of whom 15 (62%) were diagnosed with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 9 (38%) were diagnosed with non-st-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (Figure 2). No patient had a left-bundle branch block on the ECG. In 15 of the remaining 39 patients, there were no significant changes on the first ECG performed in the ED (Table 4 and Figure 2). These patients were older, more often men (73%), and had prior cardiovascular disease (20%) more frequently than patients with hsctnt < 5 ng/l and no MI. In addition they were often (40%) active smokers. The first hsctnt level was measured within 2 h of the onset of symptoms in 11 (73%) patients, and >3 h 8
10 after the onset of symptoms in 2 (13%) patients. One patient was discharged directly from the ED and was readmitted with a diagnosis of STEMI after 18 days. In two patients, a second ECG within 1 h of the first ECG showed ST elevation, and in another patient the ED physician judged the ECG to be consistent with a diagnosis of STEMI. These four patients underwent primary PCI. In the 11 patients who did not undergo immediate cardiac catheterization, the maximum hs-ctnt level ranged from 18 to 157 ng/l. In 5 (45%) of these 11 patients, the maximum hs-ctnt level was <30 ng/l (Table 4). A first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l in combination with no signs of ischemia on ECG had a negative predictive value for MI of 99.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: ) and an absolute risk for MI of 0.17% (95% CI: ) (Table 2). MI occurred in 39 patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l at 30 to 365 days after discharge from the ED, which is an incidence of 7.36 (95% CI: ) per 1000 person-years. In patients with a first hs-ctnt level of 5 to 14 ng/l, the absolute risk of MI within 30 days was 3% and the negative predictive value for MI within 30 days was 97%. In patients with a first hs-ctnt level of >14 ng/l, the absolute risk of MI within 30 days was 26% and the negative predictive value for MI within 30 days was 74% (Table 2). In patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l and no signs of ischemia on ECG, the negative predictive value for death within 30 days was 100% (95% CI: ) (Table 2), and there were 38 deaths during the 365 days after discharge from the ED. The underlying cause of death was cardiovascular disease in 2 (5%) patients, cancer in 32 (84%) patients, and another cause in 4 (11%) patients. Among patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l, there was no significant difference in the risk of death within 365 days between those who were discharged directly from the ED and those who were admitted to hospital after adjustment for age, sex, diabetes mellitus, prior MI, and egfr (hazard ratio; 0.73; 95% CI: ). 9
11 Discussion In a large cohort of 14,636 consecutive patients who sought medical attention for chest pain in the ED, we found that a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l combined with no signs of ischemia on ECG had a 99.8% negative predictive value for MI and a 100% negative predictive value for death within 30 days. Cardiac troponins have been used as a cornerstone of diagnosis of MI, together with clinical assessment and ECG findings, for more than 15 years (15). However, a limitation of former generations of troponin assays have been that they required at least 6 hours from the onset of symptoms before they would be detectable (14). Repeated testing were therefore often required, leading to unnecessary hospitalizations for investigation of chest pain. Recently, high-sensitivity cardiac troponins have been introduced in clinical practice (10,16). They increase the diagnostic accuracy, by identifying a larger proportion of patients with MI at the time of presentation to the ED. As elevation of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels are detectable at a much earlier stage than earlier generations of troponin assays (10,14,16), they have been suggested to have the potential to rule out MI at an earlier stage (5-8,10,11,16). Two recent studies investigated the negative predictive value of an intial undetectable hs-ctnt for MI (5,11). In both of these studies, patients were recruited prospectively at the discretion of the ED physician, serial hs-ctnt levels were measured, and only hospitalized patients were included. In another study, a second troponin measurement was taken 1 h after the first, and was used to rule out patients with MI (8). In all three studies, the negative predictive value for MI was almost 100% if hs-ctnt was undetectable. In contrast to those three studies, the current study included all patients who presented to the ED with a main complaint of chest pain, and used the first hs-ctnt level and ECG findings to rule out MI, without assessment of the pretest probability of MI and without serial measurements of hs- 10
12 ctnt levels. This simple strategy confirmed the findings of the two previous studies that an undetectable first hs-ctnt level rules out MI with almost 100% accuracy. Chest pain was the second most common reason for presentation to the ED during the study period, and 61% of patients with a main complaint of chest pain had a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l. Hospitalization occurred in 21% of these patients, accounting for one-third of all patients admitted to hospital because of chest pain. This indicates that 594 patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l would have to be admitted to detect one additional MI. More than two-thirds of the patients with a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l who were admitted to hospital were dischaged on the same or next day, and 50% had a discharge diagnosis of unspecified chest pain. Although some of these patients may have had other conditions requiring hospitalization such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or pulmonary embolism, we believe that hospitalization could have been avoided in the majority of these patients, resulting in an annual decrease of 500 to 1000 admissions to our hospital. Considering that an estimated 15 to 20 million patients seek medical attention at an ED for chest pain every year in Europe and the United States, the potential savings for healthcare providers are enormous (1-3). Only 15 of all patients who presented to our ED during the study period were diagnosed with MI despite having an undetectable first hs-ctnt level combined with no signs of ischemia on the intial ECG. The first hs-ctnt level was measured <2 h after the onset of symptoms in 11 of these patients. If a second hs-ctnt level would have been obtained 3-4 hours after onset of symptoms most likely it would have been significantly elevated in most of these patients. As chest pain is one of the most common symptoms in patients seeking medical attention in the ED, our strategy may help to reduce overcrowding of the ED. However, our results did not show that low-risk patients who are admitted to hospital spend more time in 11
13 the ED than those who are discharged directly from the ED. There were only 2 cardiovascular deaths in patients with undetectable hs-ctnt levels during the year that followed the visit to the ED. This indicates that hs-ctnt may not only be a predictor of early but also long-term prognosis (17). There may have been several patients among those with undetectable levels of hsctnt who were discharged from the ED who if they were admitted to hospital would have had elevated hs-ctnt levels subsequently. We calculated the risk of death within the year after the visit to the ED for patients who were admitted compared with patients who were discharged directly from the ED and found no difference. It is very important to determine whether patients with a very small elevation of the first hs-ctnt level benefit from being diagnosed with MI. There were two procedure-related MIs in our study population. As MI after PCI has a worse prognois than PCI without MI (18), a diagnosis of MI based on a very small elevation of the hs-ctnt level may increase the risk to the patient. In almost half of the patients diagnosed with MI who had a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l combined with no signs of ischemia on ECG, the maximum hs-ctnt level was <30 ng/l. With earlier generations of troponin assays, these patients would probably not have been diagnosed with MI (14). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of such a large cohort of consecutive patients (14,636 patients) who sought medical attention for chest pain, and had information on hs-ctnt levels, at an ED over 2 years. Patient follow-up was complete because follow-up data were obtained from national registers. In conclusion, we found that a first hs-ctnt level of <5 ng/l combined with no signs of ischemia on ECG ruled out MI with nearly 100% accuracy regardless of prior disease, timing of measurement of the hs-ctnt level, age, sex, or other risk factors for MI. 12
14 References 1. Nawar EW, Niska RW, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary. Advance data 2007: Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012;60: Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J. The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 2005;91: Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. The New England journal of medicine 2000;342: Body R, Carley S, McDowell G et al. Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2011;58: Than M, Cullen L, Reid CM et al. A 2-h diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms in the Asia-Pacific region (ASPECT): a prospective observational validation study. Lancet 2011;377: Cullen L, Greenslade JH, Than M et al. The new Vancouver Chest Pain Rule using troponin as the only biomarker: an external validation study. The American journal of emergency medicine 2014;32: Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Archives of internal medicine 2012;172: Pollack CV, Jr., Sites FD, Shofer FS, Sease KL, Hollander JE. Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-st elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Academic emergency 13
15 medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 2006;13: Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. The New England journal of medicine 2009;361: Rubini Gimenez M, Hoeller R, Reichlin T et al. Rapid rule out of acute myocardial infarction using undetectable levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin. International journal of cardiology 2013;168: Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC public health 2011;11: Wettermark B, Hammar N, Fored CM et al. The new Swedish Prescribed Drug Register--opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety 2007;16: Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Jaffe AS, Katus HA. Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clinical chemistry 2010;56: Hamm CW, Goldmann BU, Heeschen C, Kreymann G, Berger J, Meinertz T. Emergency room triage of patients with acute chest pain by means of rapid testing for cardiac troponin T or troponin I. The New England journal of medicine 1997;337: Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D et al. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The New England journal of medicine 2009;361: Leistner DM, Klotsche J, Pieper L et al. Circulating troponin as measured by a sensitive assay for cardiovascular risk assessment in primary prevention. Clinical chemistry 2012;58:
16 18. Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC et al. Frequency, causes, predictors, and clinical significance of peri-procedural myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention. European heart journal 2013;34:
17 Figure legends Figure 1, Study population Figure 1 demonstrates the selection of the study population, and number of patients at different levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T which are reported in ng/l. ED means, emergency department; hs-ctnt, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, and y.o., years old. Figure 2, Patients with undetectable hs-ctnt and MI within 30 days Figure 2 demonstrates all 39 patients with an intial hs-ctnt < 5 ng/l and an ECG without STelevation or depression, but MI within 30 days of follow-up. MI, means myocardial infarction; ECG, electrocardiogram; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction; NSTEMI, non-st elevation myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCX, left circumflex; RCA, right coronary artery, and hs-ctnt, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. 16
18 Table 1 Characteristics of the Study Population According to the First High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T level (ng/l) All patients < >14 Number of patients 14, Percentage of study population Age (years) 55 (19) 47 (15) 63 (16) 71 (15) Female sex, n (%) egfr (%) >60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 (%) ml/min/1.73 m 2 (%) ml/min/1.73 m egfr (ml/min/1.73 m 2 ) 90 (25) 99 (18) 82 (21) 65 (28) Diabetes mellitus (%) COPD (%) Prior MI (%) Prior stroke (%) Prior hospitalization for CHF (%) Aspirin Beta-blockers ACE/ARB Statins
19 egfr = estimated glomerular filtration rate; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; MI = myocardial infarction; CHF = congestive heart failure; ACE/ARB = angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-receptor blocker. Age and egfr are shown as mean (standard deviation). 18
20 Table 2. Absolute Risks and Negative Predictive Values for Myocardial Infarction or Death at 30, 180, and 365 Days after Discharge from the ED, According to the First High- Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level, in 14,612* Patients who Sought Medical Attention for Chest Pain at Karolinska University Hospital from December 2010 to December 2012 High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T level (ng/l) < >14 Number of patients 8883* Proportion admitted (%) 1917 (21) 1397 (44) 2104 (82) Myocardial infarction 30 days Number of events Absolute risk 0.17 ( ) Negative predictive value 99.8 ( ) 3.08 ( ) 96.9 ( ) 180 days Number of events Absolute risk 0.37 ( ) Negative predictive value 365 days 99.6 ( ) 3.65 ( ) 96.4 ( ) Number of events Absolute risk 0.61 ( ) Negative predictive value Death 30 days 4.25 ( ) 26.2 ( ) 73.8 ( ) 28.1 ( ) 71.9 ( ) 29.2 ( ) 70.8 ( ) 95.7 ( ( ) 96.5) Number of events Absolute risk ( ( ( ) 19
21 0.054) 0.64) Negative 99.6 ( ( ) predictive value 99.8) 97.4 ( ) 180 days Number of events Absolute risk Negative predictive value 365 days 0.17 ( ) 99.8 ( ) 2.09 ( ) 97.9 ( ) Number of events Absolute risk 0.43 ( ) Negative predictive value 99.6 ( ) 3.43 ( ) 96.6 ( ) 8.38 ( ) 91.6 ( ) 13.3 ( ) 86.7 ( ) *Twenty-four patients with a first high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level of <5 ng/l were excluded because they had ECG changes suggestive of myocardial infarction at the time of presentation to the emergency department. Absolute risks and negative predictive values are given as percentage (95% confidence interval). 20
22 Table 3 The 12 Most Common Discharge Diagnoses for Patients Admitted to Hospital, According to the First High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level (ng/l) < >14 (n = 1,917) (n = 1,397) (n = 2,104) Chest pain (%) 50 Chest pain 34 MI 30 A-fib/SVT (%) 5.6 Angina 8.1 Chest pain 13 Angina (%) 5.1 A-fib/SVT 7.5 Heart failure 8.7 Abdominal pain 2.8 MI 5.1 A-fib/SVT 7.2 (%) Myalgia (%) 2.4 Unstable 3.2 Angina 4.2 angina MI (%) 2.0 Heart failure 3.1 Pneumonia 4.1 Pneumonia(%) 1.8 Pneumonia 2.3 Unstable 2.4 angina Syncope (%) 1.8 Syncope 1.9 Myocarditis 1.6 Hypertension (%) 1.6 Myalgia 1.7 PE 1.2 Unstable angina (%) 1.5 Hypertension 1.4 Syncope 1.2 PE (%) 1.3 PE 1.3 Aortic stenosis 1.1 Palpitations (%) 1.0 Dyspnea 1.2 Hypertension 0.9 Chest pain was defined as international classification of diseases (ICD) code (version 10) R07.4, R07.3, Z03.4, or Z03.5; atrial fibrillation (A-fib) as I48.9; supraventricular 21
23 tachychardia (SVT) as I47.1; myalgia as M79.1; syncope as R55.9; hypertension as I10.9; unstable angina as I20.0; pulmonary embolism (PE) as I26.9; palpitations as R00.2; pneumonia as J18.9; abdominal pain as R10.4, K29.7, or K85.9; dyspnea as R06.0; aortic stenosis as I35.0; myocarditis as I40.9; and myocardial infarction (MI) as I21.4, I21.9, or I
24 Table 4 Details of 15 Patients with Chest Pain and a First High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level of <5 ηg/l Combined with No Signs of Ischemia on ECG, who had a Final Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction Sex Age Previous Medical History Male 48 This patient had Female 52 COPD, never smoked, and had a BMI of 31 kg/m 2. This patient had hypertension, was an ex-smoker, and had a BMI of 22 kg/m 2. Male 39 This patient had Current Medical History Sudden onset of chest pain and tachycardia in the morning. Sudden onset of chest discomfort in the morning. Time from Onset of Symptoms to 1 st, 2 nd and 3rd Hs-cTnT Level <1 h: <5 ng/l 6 7 h: 33 ng/l h: 23 ng/l 2 3 h: <5 ng/l 8 9 h: 18 ng/l h: 9 ng/l ECG Assessment by the ED Physician SR, 108 beats/min, no signs of ischemia. SR, 97 beats/min, nonspecific STsegment changes in leads V4 V6. Sudden onset of chest 1 2 h: <5 ng/l SR, 55 beats/min, Clinical Course Coronary angiograhy was performed on day 3 and a stent was placed in the LAD. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. Coronary angiography on day 4 was normal. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. Primary PCI was performed and a stent hypertension, was an pain and nausea during 7 8 h: 1,930 ST-segment elevation was placed in the RCA. The final diagnosis 23
25 ex-smoker, and had a physical activity. ng/l in leads II and avf. was STEMI. BMI of 28 kg/m 2. Male 64 This patient was a previously healthy smoker and had a BMI of 28 kg/m 2. Male 57 This patient had a prior CABG, never smoked, and had a BMI of 25 kg/m 2. Male 59 This patient had hypertension, was a current smoker, and Sudden left-sided stabbing sensation in the chest. Sudden onset of chest pain and nausea in the morning. Sudden onset of chest pain during the night. <1 h: <5 ng/l SR, 85 beats/min, no 1 2 h: <5 ng/l 7 8 h: 0.16 ng/l* h: 0.34 ηg/l* 1 2 h: <5 ng/l 7 8 h: 81 ng/l signs of ischemia. SR, 63 beats/min, Q- wave in lead III h: 149 SR, ST-segment depression in leads I and avl. This patient was discharged from the ED, but returned after 18 days with STEMI, which was treated with primary PCI with stenting of the LAD. Coronary angiography was performed on day 3 and a stent was placed in the RCA. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. Coronary angiography was performed on day 3 and a stent was placed in the RCA. The final dignosis was NSTEMI. had a BMI of 27 ng/l 24
26 kg/m 2. Male 62 This patient was a non-smoker and had a BMI of 28 kg/m 2. Female 72 This patient was a current smoker and had a BMI of 22 kg/m 2. Male 68 This patient had hypertension, was a non-smoker, and had a BMI of 31 kg/m 2. Sudden onset of recurrent chest pain. Sudden onset of leftsided chest pain in the morning. 1 2 h: <5 ng/l 7 8 h: 21 ng/l h: 21 ng/l <1 h: <5 ng/l 6 7 h: 4,560 ng/l SR, 107 beats/min, no signs of ischemia. SR, 45 beats/min, no signs of ischemia. Sudden onset of chest 2 3 h: <5 ng/l SR, 110 beats/min, pain, diaphoresis, nausea, and dyspnea. 8 9 h: 18 ng/l h: 15 ng/l no signs of ischemia. Coronary angiography was performed on day 2 and a stent was placed in the LAD. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. A second ECG performed 1 h after the first ECG showed ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads. Primary PCI was performed and a stent was placed in the LCX. The final diagnosis was STEMI. Coronary angiography was performed on day 4, and was normal. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. 25
27 Male 64 This patient was a Sudden onset of chest 1 2 h: <5 ng/l SR, 60 beats/min, T- A second ECG performed 30 min after the current smoker and had a BMI of 31 kg/m 2. Male 56 This patient was a current smoker and had a BMI of 20 kg/m 2. Female 68 This patient had 3 prior MIs and a prior CABG, was an active smoker, and had a BMI of 17 kg/m 2. pain and diaphoresis at noon. Sudden onset of chest pain during physical activity. 7 8 h: 158 ng/l h: 888 ng/l 1 2 h: <5 ng/l 7 8 h: 29 ng/l h: 56 wave inversion in leads V1 and V2. SR, no signs of ischemia. ng/l Sudden onset of leftsided >3 h: <5 ng/l SR, 60 beats/min, no chest pain during >9 h: 40 ng/l signs of ischemia. physical activity. first ECG showed ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads. Primary PCI was performed and a stent was placed in the RCA. The final diagnosis was STEMI. Coronary angiography was performed on day 5, and was normal. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. Coronary angiography was performed on day 2 and showed no significant stenosis. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. Female 56 This patient was an Sudden onset of chest <1 h: <5 ng/l SR, 76 beats/min, no ECG later on the day of admission showed 26
28 active smoker and had pain during the night. 6 7 h: 19 ng/l signs of ischemia. ST-segment elevation. Coronary a BMI of 27 kg/m 2. angiography showed no significant stenosis. The final diagnosis was STEMI. Male 54 This patient had Sudden onset of chest 1 2 h: <5 ng/l SR, non-significant Coronary angiography was performed on hypertension, was an pain in the morning. 7 8 h: 157 ng/l ST-segment elevation day 3 and showed no signficant stenosis. ex-smoker, and had a h: 92 in leads V3 V6. The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. BMI of 26 kg/m 2. ng/l Male 72 This patient had a Sudden onset of chest >3 h: <5 ng/l SR, no signs of Coronary angiography was performed on prior stroke, was a pain during the night. >9 h: 12 ng/l ischemia. day 3 and showed no signficant stenosis. non-smoker, and had > 15 h: 29 ng/l The final diagnosis was NSTEMI. a BMI of 24 kg/m 2. BMI = body mass index; BP = blood pressure; RR = respiratory rate; ECG = electrocardiogram; SR = sinus rhythm; LAD = left anterior descending artery; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; LCX = left circumflex artery; STEMI = ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; MI = myocardial infarction, *This patient had cardiac troponin I analyzed after he was admitted to the cardiac care unit. 27
29
30
31 Table 1, supplemental material. Time Spent In the Emergency Department in Relation to High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level and Discharge or Admission All patients Hs-cTnT < 5 Hs-cTnT 5-14 Hs-cTnT > 14 All Admitted Discharged MI as discharge diagnosis All Admitted Discharged MI as discharge diagnosis All Admitted Discharged MI as discharge diagnosis Time in minutes (SD) 209 (107) 207 (103) 203 (111) Ta 123 (94) 217 (115) 211 (111) 221 (109) 156 (184) 204 (112) 196 (109) 238 (120) 150 (90) Hs-cTnT, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T; SD, standard deviation; MI, myocardial infarction. Time is reported as mean (standard deviations).
Undetectable High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 63, No. 23, 2014 Ó 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/$36.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. Open access under CC BY-NC-ND
More informationUndetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD; Rickard Ljung, MD, PhD; Magnus Johansson, MD, PhD; Martin Holzmann,
More informationUndetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction
Undetectable High Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Level in the Emergency Department and Risk of Myocardial Infarction Nadia Bandstein, MD; Rickard Ljung, MD, PhD; Magnus Johansson, MD, PhD; Martin Holzmann,
More informationTROPONIN POSITIVE 2/20/2015 WHAT DOES IT MEAN? When should a troponin level be obtained?
TROPONIN POSITIVE WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Use of Troponin in the Clinical Setting What does an elevated troponin level mean? Elevated troponin is a sensitive and specific
More informationAcute Myocardial Infarction. Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC
Acute Myocardial Infarction Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC Acute Myocardial Infarction Definition: Decreased delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the myocardium Myocardial tissue necrosis causing irreparable
More informationAcute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction Hafeza Shaikh, DO, FACC, RPVI Lourdes Cardiology Services Asst.Program Director, Cardiology Fellowship Associate Professor, ROWAN-SOM Acute Myocardial Infarction Definition:
More informationDR ALEXIA STAVRATI CARDIOLOGIST, DIRECTOR OF CARDIOLOGY DEPT, "G. PAPANIKOLAOU" GH, THESSALONIKI
The Impact of AF on Natural History of CAD DR ALEXIA STAVRATI CARDIOLOGIST, DIRECTOR OF CARDIOLOGY DEPT, "G. PAPANIKOLAOU" GH, THESSALONIKI CAD MOST COMMON CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF DEATH
More informationUPDATE ON THE MANAGEMENTACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. DR JULES KABAHIZI, Psc (Rwa) Lt Col CHIEF CONSULTANT RMH/KFH 28 JUNE18
UPDATE ON THE MANAGEMENTACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME DR JULES KABAHIZI, Psc (Rwa) Lt Col CHIEF CONSULTANT RMH/KFH 28 JUNE18 INTRODUCTION The clinical entities that comprise acute coronary syndromes (ACS)-ST-segment
More informationSupplementary Online Content
Supplementary Online Content Rubini Giménez M, Twerenbold R, Boeddinghaus J, et al. Clinical effect of sex-specific cutoff values of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in suspected myocardial infarction.
More informationWhat oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor
76 year old female Prior Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Smoking On Hydrochlorothiazide, Atorvastatin New onset chest discomfort; 2 episodes in past 24 hours Heart rate 122/min; BP 170/92 mm Hg, Killip Class
More informationMario Plebani University-Hospital of Padova, Italy
Mario Plebani University-Hospital of Padova, Italy CK-MB mass assay CHF guidelines use BNP for rule out AST in AMI CK in AMI INH for CK-MB electrophoresis for CK and LD isoenzymes RIA for myoglobin WHO
More informationValidation of an accelerated high-sensitivity troponin T assay protocol in an Australian cohort with chest pain
Elevation of cardiac troponin (ctn) levels is central to the definition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). 1 Increasingly sensitive ctn assays offer the potential for AMI to be diagnosed earlier than
More informationAcute Coronary Syndrome
ACUTE CORONOARY SYNDROME, ANGINA & ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Administrative Consultant Service 3/17 Acute Coronary Syndrome Acute Coronary Syndrome has evolved as a useful operational term to refer to
More informationBioRemarkable Symposium
BACC BioRemarkable Symposium Acute Myocardial infarction Stefan Blankenberg University Heart Center Hamburg London, September 7th, 2017 Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Third Universal-Definition
More informationMedical Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The roles of a noncardiologist. Norbert Lingling D. Uy, MD Professor of Medicine UERMMMCI
Medical Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The roles of a noncardiologist physician Norbert Lingling D. Uy, MD Professor of Medicine UERMMMCI Outcome objectives of the discussion: At the end of the
More informationDiagnostics consultation document
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Diagnostics consultation document Myocardial infarction (acute): Early rule out using high-sensitivity troponin tests (Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive,
More informationDIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME
DIAGNOSTICS ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Evidence overview Early rule out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction: High-sensitivity troponin tests (Elecsys troponin T high-sensitive, ARCHITECT STAT highsensitivity
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationFourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018)
EUSEM, Glasgow 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018) Univ.-Prof. Dr. Martin Möckel, Division of Emergency and Acute Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin 2 1 History of
More informationRapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a sensitive troponin I assay
Original Article Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2015, Vol. 52(5) 543 549! The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalspermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0004563215576976 acb.sagepub.com
More informationAPPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM
APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM Instruction: Complete this form to notify all ACS admissions at your centre to National Cardiovascular Disease Registry. Where check boxes are provided, check ( ) one or more
More informationCommon Codes for ICD-10
Common Codes for ICD-10 Specialty: Cardiology *Always utilize more specific codes first. ABNORMALITIES OF HEART RHYTHM ICD-9-CM Codes: 427.81, 427.89, 785.0, 785.1, 785.3 R00.0 Tachycardia, unspecified
More informationHigh Sensitivity Troponins. IT S TIME TO SAVE LIVES. Updates from the ESC 2015 Guidelines November 17th 2016 OPL CONGRESS Dr.
High Sensitivity Troponins. IT S TIME TO SAVE LIVES. Updates from the ESC 2015 Guidelines November 17th 2016 OPL CONGRESS Dr. Marcel El Achkar Chairperson of Laboratory department Nini Hospital Lecturer
More informationCase Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA
Case Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA Case History A 50-year-old man with type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypertension presents after experiencing 1 hour of midsternal chest pain that began after
More informationEDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CARDIAC FUNCTION: BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS UPDATE
EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CARDIAC FUNCTION: BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS UPDATE Educational commentary is provided through our affiliation with the American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP). To obtain FREE CME/CMLE
More informationThe MAIN-COMPARE Study
Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary Stent Implantation versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization for Unprotected Left MAIN Coronary Artery Stenosis:
More informationEARLY DIAGNOSIS AND RISK STRATIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION, SÖDERSJUKHUSET Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND RISK STRATIFICATION IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
More informationBelinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016
Acute Coronary syndromes All STEMI ALL Non STEMI Unstable angina Belinda Green, Cardiologist, SDHB, 2016 Thrombus in proximal LAD Underlying pathophysiology Be very afraid for your patient Wellens
More informationDiagnostics guidance Published: 1 October 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/dg15
Myocardial infarction (acute): Early rule out using high-sensitivity troponin tests (Elecsys Troponin T high-sensitive, e, ARCHITECT STAT T High Sensitive Troponin-I and AccuTnI+3 assays) Diagnostics guidance
More informationElectrocardiography. Hilal Al Saffar College of Medicine,Baghdad University
Electrocardiography Hilal Al Saffar College of Medicine,Baghdad University Which of the following is True 1. PR interval, represent the time taken for the impulse to travel from SA node to AV nose. 2.
More informationPatient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup
ISCHAEMIA TESTING CHAPTER TESTING FOR MYCOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA VERSUS NOT TESTING FOR MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA Ref ID: 4154 Reference Wienbergen H, Kai GA, Schiele R et al. Actual clinical practice exercise ing
More informationHow will new high sensitive troponins affect the criteria?
How will new high sensitive troponins affect the criteria? Hugo A Katus MD Abteilung Innere Medizin III Kardiologie, Angiologie, Pulmologie Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg Even more sensitive: The new
More informationAcute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO
Acute Coronary Syndrome Sonny Achtchi, DO Objectives Understand evidence based and practice based treatments for stabilization and initial management of ACS Become familiar with ACS risk stratification
More informationCoding an Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unravelling the Mystery
Coding an Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unravelling the Mystery by Karen Carr, MS, BSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP, and Lisa Romanello, MSHI, BSN, RN, CCDS, CDIP WHITE PAPER Summary: The following white paper offers
More informationStatin pretreatment and presentation patterns in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Brief Report Page 1 of 5 Statin pretreatment and presentation patterns in patients with acute coronary syndromes Marcelo Trivi, Ruth Henquin, Juan Costabel, Diego Conde Cardiovascular Institute of Buenos
More informationECG Workshop. Nezar Amir
ECG Workshop Nezar Amir Myocardial Ischemia ECG Infarct ECG in STEMI is dynamic & evolving Common causes of ST shift Infarct Localisation Left main artery occlusion: o diffuse ST-depression with ST elevation
More informationRelationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome
Relationship between body mass index, coronary disease extension and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome Helder Dores, Luís Bronze Carvalho, Ingrid Rosário, Sílvio Leal, Maria João
More informationS (18) doi: /j.ajem Reference: YAJEM 57346
Accepted Manuscript A portrait of patients who die in-hospital from acute pulmonary embolism Hesham R. Omar, Mehdi Mirsaeidi, Bishoy Abraham, Garett Enten, Devanand Mangar, Enrico M. Camporesi PII: S0735-6757(18)30172-4
More informationUse of Biomarkers for Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Use of Biomarkers for Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction Allan S. Jaffe, MD.* Consultant - Cardiology & Laboratory Medicine Professor of Medicine Chair, CCLS Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine
More informationChest pain and troponins on the acute take. J N Townend Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Chest pain and troponins on the acute take J N Townend Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham 3 rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction Type 1: Spontaneous MI related to atherosclerotic plaque rupture
More informationTopic. Updates on Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Topic Updates on Definition of Myocardial Infarction In the past, general consensus for MI? Definition of MI by WHO - Combination of 2 of 3 characteristics - 1. Typical Symptoms 2. Enzyme Rise 3. Typical
More informationPercutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery Hassan Al Zammar, MD,FESC Consultant & Interventional Cardiologist Head of Cardiology Department European Gaza Hospital Palestine European
More informationOVERVIEW ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME SYMPTOMS 9/30/14 TYPICAL WHAT IS ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME? SYMPTOMS, IDENTIFICATION, MANAGEMENT
OVERVIEW ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME SYMPTOMS, IDENTIFICATION, MANAGEMENT OCTOBER 7, 2014 PETE PERAUD, MD SYMPTOMS TYPICAL ATYPICAL IDENTIFICATION EKG CARDIAC BIOMARKERS STEMI VS NON-STEMI VS USA MANAGEMENT
More informationSupplement materials:
Supplement materials: Table S1: ICD-9 codes used to define prevalent comorbid conditions and incident conditions Comorbid condition ICD-9 code Hypertension 401-405 Diabetes mellitus 250.x Myocardial infarction
More informationTicagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial
compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial August 30, 2009 at 08.00 CET PLATO background In NSTE-ACS and STEMI, current guidelines recommend 12 months aspirin and
More informationAcute Coronary Syndrome. Emergency Department Updated Jan. 2017
Acute Coronary Syndrome Emergency Department Updated Jan. 2017 Goals and Objectives To reduce mortality and morbidity for people who have cardiovascular disease, with a focus on those who experience an
More informationA Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS Magnus Ohman MB, on behalf of the GEMINI-ACS-1 Investigators
More informationImpact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease
Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease Gjin Ndrepepa, Tomohisa Tada, Massimiliano Fusaro, Lamin King, Martin Hadamitzky,
More informationEssam Mahfouz, MD. Professor of Cardiology, Mansoura University
By Essam Mahfouz, MD. Professor of Cardiology, Mansoura University Agenda Definitions Classifications Epidemiology Risk stratification What is new? What is MI? Myocardial infarction is the death of part
More informationStandard emergency department care vs. admission to an observation unit for low-risk chest pain patients. A two-phase prospective cohort study
Standard emergency department care vs. admission to an observation unit for low-risk chest pain patients A. STUDY PURPOSE AND RATIONALE Rationale: A two-phase prospective cohort study IRB Proposal Sara
More informationCardiovascular Disease
Cardiovascular Disease Session Guidelines This is a 15 minute webinar session for CNC physicians and staff CNC holds webinars on the 3 rd Wednesday of each month to address topics related to risk adjustment
More informationDIFFERENTIATING THE PATIENT WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CHEST PAIN
DIFFERENTIATING THE PATIENT WITH UNDIFFERENTIATED CHEST PAIN Objectives Gain competence in evaluating chest pain Recognize features of moderate risk unstable angina Review initial management of UA and
More informationDUKECATHR Dataset Dictionary
DUKECATHR Dataset Dictionary Version of DUKECATH dataset for educational use that has been modified to be unsuitable for clinical research or publication (Created Date and Time: 28OCT16 14:35) Table of
More informationMasqueraders of STEMI
Masqueraders of STEMI Steven M. Costa, M.D. Assistant Professor Department of Medicine Division of Cardiology Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic Texas A&M University Health Science Center Disclosures
More informationHigh Sensitivity Troponin Improves Management. But Not Yet
High Sensitivity Troponin Improves Management But Not Yet Allan S. Jaffe, MD.* Consultant - Cardiology & Laboratory Medicine Professor of Medicine Chair, CCLS Division, Department of Laboratory Medicine
More informationImpact of Chest Pain Protocol Targeting Intermediate Cardiac Risk Patients in an Observation Unit of an Academic Tertiary Care Center
Elmer ress Original Article J Clin Med Res. 2016;8(2):111-115 Impact of Chest Pain Protocol Targeting Intermediate Cardiac Risk Patients in an Observation Unit of an Academic Tertiary Care Center Tariq
More informationChest Pain. Dr Robert Huggett Consultant Cardiologist
Chest Pain Dr Robert Huggett Consultant Cardiologist Outline Diagnosis of cardiac chest pain 2016 NICE update on stable chest pain Assessment of unstable chest pain/acs and MI definition Scope of the
More informationTROPONINS HAVE THEY CHANGED YOUR
TROPONINS HAVE THEY CHANGED YOUR PRACTICE THIS WEEK? Harvey White John Neutze Scholar Green Lane Cardiovascular Service and Cardiovascular Research Unit Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand Disclosure
More informationBeta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes
Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes Seung-Jae Joo and other KAMIR-NIH investigators Department of Cardiology, Jeju National
More informationChest pain management. Ruvin Gabriel and Niels van Pelt August 2011
Chest pain management Ruvin Gabriel and Niels van Pelt August 2011 Introduction Initial assessment Case 1 Case 2 and 3 Comparison of various diagnostic techniques Summary 1-2 % of GP consultations are
More informationECG in coronary artery disease. By Sura Boonrat Central Chest Institute
ECG in coronary artery disease By Sura Boonrat Central Chest Institute EKG P wave = Atrium activation PR interval QRS = Ventricle activation T wave= repolarization J-point EKG QT interval Abnormal repolarization
More informationMyocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan
Myocardial Infarction In 2007 Dr.Yahya Kiwan New Definition Of Acute Myocardial Infarction The term of myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting
More informationHEART AND SOUL STUDY OUTCOME EVENT - MORBIDITY REVIEW FORM
REVIEW DATE REVIEWER'S ID HEART AND SOUL STUDY OUTCOME EVENT - MORBIDITY REVIEW FORM : DISCHARGE DATE: RECORDS FROM: Hospitalization ER Please check all that may apply: Myocardial Infarction Pages 2, 3,
More informationWhat is a myocardial infarction and how do we treat it? Paul Das Consultant Cardiologist North Wales Cardiac Centre Glan Clwyd Hospital
What is a myocardial infarction and how do we treat it? Paul Das Consultant Cardiologist North Wales Cardiac Centre Glan Clwyd Hospital What is a myocardial infarction? THEY AINT WHAT THEY USED TO BE Case
More information12 Lead EKG Chapter 4 Worksheet
Match the following using the word bank. 1. A form of arteriosclerosis in which the thickening and hardening of the vessels walls are caused by an accumulation of fatty deposits in the innermost lining
More informationExhibit EP16.h University of Virginia Medical Center Clinical Decision Tool
TITLE: Emergency Management for Suspicion of Cardiac Event PURPOSE: Increasingly, patients have multiple morbidities and are at risk of adverse events related or unrelated to the condition for which they
More informationACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME
12 LEAD ECG INTERPRETATION in ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME WAYNE W RUPPERT, CVT, CCCC, NREMT-P Cardiovascular Clinical Coordinator Bayfront Health Seven Rivers Crystal River, FL Education Specialist St. Joseph
More informationSupplementary material 1. Definitions of study endpoints (extracted from the Endpoint Validation Committee Charter) 1.
Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the SIGNIFY trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease without clinical
More informationDisclosures. Inpatient Management of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes. Edward McNulty MD, FACC. None
Inpatient Management of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Edward McNulty MD, FACC Assistant Clinical Professor UCSF Director, SF VAMC Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Disclosures None New Guidelines
More informationAccepted Manuscript. Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA)
Accepted Manuscript Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA) Joseph S. Alpert MD, Rokas Serpytis MD, Pranas Serpytis MD, Qin M. Chen PhD PII: S0002-9343(18)31183-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.12.005
More informationPost Operative Troponin Leak: David Smyth Christchurch New Zealand
Post Operative Troponin Leak: Does It Really Matter? David Smyth Christchurch New Zealand Life Was Simple Once Transmural Infarction Subendocardial Infarction But the Blood Tests Were n t Perfect Creatine
More informationCurrent Utilities of Cardiac Biomarker Testing at POC. June 24, 2010 Joe Pezzuto, MT (ASCP) Carolyn Kite, RN
Current Utilities of Cardiac Biomarker Testing at POC June 24, 2010 Joe Pezzuto, MT (ASCP) Carolyn Kite, RN 1. Discuss challenges associated with diagnosing Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) and Heart Failure
More informationAcute Coronary Syndromes
Overview Acute Coronary Syndromes Rabeea Aboufakher, MD, FACC, FSCAI Section Chief of Cardiology Altru Health System Grand Forks, ND Epidemiology Pathophysiology Clinical features and diagnosis STEMI management
More informationThe Value of Stress MRI in Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia
The Value of Stress MRI in Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia Dr. Saeed Al Sayari, MBBS, EBCR, MBA Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Mafraq Hospital, Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates Introduction
More informationThe Changing Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Implications for practice: Dr. Sonia Anand, McMaster University
The Changing Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Implications for practice: Dr. Sonia Anand, McMaster University Expert Opinions CCS Vancouver, BC October 23, 2011 Overview of ACS Epidemiology: Global
More informationAcute Coronary syndrome
Acute Coronary syndrome 7th Annual Pharmacotherapy Conference ACS Pathophysiology rupture or erosion of a vulnerable, lipidladen, atherosclerotic coronary plaque, resulting in exposure of circulating blood
More informationPreoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment: Approach & Guidelines
Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment: Approach & Guidelines By, Liam Morris, MD., FACC (02/03/18) CPG : Clinical Practice Guidelines GDMT : Guidelines Directed Medical Therapy GWC : Guideline Writing Committee
More information10/22/16. Lay of the land. Definition of ACS. Why do we worry about ST elevations?
Lay of the land Update on Acute Coronary Syndrome: Five Things Hospitalists Must Know Dhruv S. Kazi, MD, MSc, MS Assistant Professor Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Department of Epidemiology and
More informationRecent community campaigns on
Availability of highly sensitive troponin assays and acute coronary syndrome care: insights from the SNAPSHOT registry Use of hs troponin testing of patients hospitalised with possible ACS was associated
More informationObjectives. Identify early signs and symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome Initiate proper protocol for ACS patient 10/2013 2
10/2013 1 Objectives Identify early signs and symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome Initiate proper protocol for ACS patient 10/2013 2 Purpose of this Education Module: Chest Pain Center Accreditation involves
More informationCardiac Troponin Testing and Chest Pain Patients: Exploring the Shades of Gray
Cardiac Troponin Testing and Chest Pain Patients: Exploring the Shades of Gray Nichole Korpi-Steiner, PhD, DABCC, FACB University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC Learning Objectives Describe the acute
More informationCardiovascular Disorders Lecture 3 Coronar Artery Diseases
Cardiovascular Disorders Lecture 3 Coronar Artery Diseases By Prof. El Sayed Abdel Fattah Eid Lecturer of Internal Medicine Delta University Coronary Heart Diseases It is the leading cause of death in
More informationDefining rise and fall of cardiac troponin values
Defining rise and fall of cardiac troponin values Doable but Not Simple Allan S. Jaffe, MD.* Consultant - Cardiology & Laboratory Medicine Professor of Medicine Chair, CCLS Division, Department of Laboratory
More informationAcute Coronary Syndromes. Disclosures
Acute Coronary Syndromes Disclosures I work for Virginia Garcia Memorial Health Center, Beaverton, OR. Jon Tardiff, BS, PA-C OHSU Clinical Assistant Professor And I am a medical editor for Jones & Bartlett
More informationRisk Stratification for CAD for the Primary Care Provider
Risk Stratification for CAD for the Primary Care Provider Shimoli Shah MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Directory, Ambulatory Cardiology Clinic Knight Cardiovascular Institute Oregon Health & Sciences
More informationTroponin when is an assay high sensitive?
Troponin when is an assay high sensitive? Professor P. O. Collinson MA MB BChir FRCPath FRCP edin MD FACB EurClin Chem Consultant Chemical Pathologist and Professor of Cardiovascular Biomarkers, Departments
More informationConference Paper Small Changes in Cardiac Troponin Levels Are Common in Patients with Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic Implications
Conference Papers in Medicine, Article ID 583175, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/583175 Conference Paper Small Changes in Cardiac Troponin Levels Are Common in Patients with Myocardial Infarction:
More informationA Cardiologist s Guide to Love
A Cardiologist s Guide to Love A brief overview of what everyone should know about Palpitations, Heartache and Heartbreak! Eric J Dueweke, MD FACC Disclosure No one has yet to offer to pay me for my opinion.
More informationPeri-operative Troponin Measurements - Pathophysiology and Prognosis
Peri-operative Troponin Measurements - Pathophysiology and Prognosis Allan S. Jaffe, MD.* Consultant - Cardiology & Laboratory Medicine Professor of Medicine Chair, CCLS Division, Department of Laboratory
More informationKeywords Acute coronary syndromes, High sensitivity cardiac markers, Malta, Troponin T, Myocardial infarction
Did the introduction of high-sensitivity Troponin T for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndrome in Malta result in reduction of hospitalization time? A retrospective review Ahmed Chilmeran,
More informationIndications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014
Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014 Indications for cardiac catheterization Before a decision to perform an invasive procedure such
More informationImproving the detection of myocardial infarction in women
Improving the detection of myocardial infarction in women British Cardiac Society Listening to the Female Voice 4 th June 2014 anoopsshah@gmail.com Dr Anoop Shah BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences
More informationStable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy
Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy Cardiology Basics and Updated Guideline 2018 Chang-Hwan Yoon, MD/PhD Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine Bundang
More information12 Lead ECGs: Ischemia, Injury & Infarction. Kevin Handke NRP, FP-C, CCP, CMTE STEMI Coordinator Flight Paramedic
12 Lead ECGs: Ischemia, Injury & Infarction Kevin Handke NRP, FP-C, CCP, CMTE STEMI Coordinator Flight Paramedic None Disclosures Objectives Upon completion of this program the learner will be able to
More informationRisk Stratification of ACS Patients. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD University of Leuven, Belgium
Risk Stratification of ACS Patients Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD University of Leuven, Belgium Which type of ACS patients are we talking about to day? 4/14/2011 STEMI and NSTEMI in the NRMI registry from
More informationSafety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD
Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD Mun K. Hong, MD Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiovascular Intervention and Research Weill Cornell
More informationProspective Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Identify ED Chest Pain Patients Who Can Safely be Removed from Cardiac Monitoring
Prospective Validation of a Clinical Decision Rule to Identify ED Chest Pain Patients Who Can Safely be Removed from Cardiac Monitoring Department of Emergency Medicine CAEP 2015 Shahbaz Syed PGY 3 FRCP
More informationAssessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington
Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington Disclosure None. I have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise. CME
More informationMy Patient Needs a Stress Test
My Patient Needs a Stress Test Amy S. Burhanna,, MD, FACC Coastal Cardiology Cape May Court House, New Jersey Absolute and relative contraindications to exercise testing Absolute Acute myocardial infarction
More informationEffect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI
Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI Dr Sasha Koul, MD Dept of Cardiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
More information