Soils Baseline Report Jay Project Appendix A, Soils Data September 2014 ANNEX V: APPENDIX A SOILS DATA
|
|
- Lambert Shepherd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ANNEX V: APPENDIX A SOILS DATA
2 Table of Contents A1 REFERENCES Tables Table A-1 Summary of Soil and Terrain Data Collected, Table A-2a Soil Subgroup Code Descriptions... 3 Table A-2b Soil Horizon Symbol Definitions... 4 Table A-3 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Brunisolic Soils (Upland) within the Baseline Study Area... 5 Table A-4 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Regosolic Soils (Uplands) in the Baseline Study Area... 7 Table A-5 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Cryosolic Soils (Uplands) in the Baseline Study Area... 8 Table A-6 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Peaty Cryosolic Soils and Organic (Wetlands) in the Baseline Study Area Table A-7 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Gleysolic Soils (Wetland) in the Baseline Study Area Table A-8 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Brunisolic Soils Sampled, Table A-9 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Cryosolic Soils Sampled, Table A-10 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Regosolic Soils Sampled, Table A-11 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Gleysolic Soils Sampled, Table A-12 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloid and Non-Metal) Chemistry for Organic Materials Sampled, A-i
3 Table A-1 Summary of Soil and Terrain Data Collected, 2013 Site Name Easting GPS Location Northing Surface Expression Landform Slope Position Percent Slope Slope Length (m) Peat/LFH Depth (cm) Topsoil Depth (cm) Soil Texture Drainage Parent Material (a) Subgroup Code (b) Depth to Bedrock (m) Sampled DJS Undulating Upland/wetland transition Lower >2-5 < Loamy Poor TILL R.G 80 No DJS Nearly level Other wetland Level < Mesic/loam Poor TILL GL.SCpt No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >5-10 < Loamy Rapid TILL O.R 42 No DJS Undulating Upland Crest Loamy Rapid TILL O.DYB 15 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Upper < Loamy Well TILL O.DYB 17 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Mid >2-5 < Loamy Rapid TILL O.DYBct 65 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Lower >2-5 < Loamy Rapid TILL O.DYBct 56 Yes DJS Undulating Other wetland Depression Fibric/silt Poor TILL GL.SCpt Yes DJS Undulating Upland Crest > Sandy loam Rapid TILL OD.TC 22 Yes DJS Nearly level Other wetland Depression > Fibric/fine y loam Poor TILL GL.SCpt Yes DJS Nearly level Other wetland Depression > Sandy loam Very poor TILL R.Gct Yes DJS Undulating Upland Mid >5-10 > Loamy Well TILL O.R 35 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Upper >5-10 > Loamy Well TILL OD.TC 31 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Lower >2-5 < Loamy Poor TILL R.TC Yes DJS Ridge Upland Crest Coarse Well GLFL O.HR Yes DJS Undulating Upland Mid >10-15 > Loamy Well TILL R.TC 53 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Crest Loamy Well TILL R.TC 28 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Lower >5-10 > Fibric/loamy Well TILL O.Rpt 23 Yes DJS Depression Other wetland Depression Loamy Poor TILL R.G Yes DJS Undulating Upland Mid >5-10 > Loamy Well TILL O.DYB 48 Yes DJS Undulating Other wetland Lower >5-10 > Fibric/loamy Very poor O/TILL T.F Yes DJS Undulating Upland Upper >0.5-2 > Loamy Rapid TILL O.DYB 30 Yes DJS Inclined Other wetland Lower >0.5-2 > Loamy Poor TILL R.G Yes DJS Inclined Other wetland Toe >2-5 < Fibric/mesic Imperfect O T.M 48 Yes DJS Inclined Upland Toe >2-5 < DJS Inclined Other wetland Lower >0.5-2 < Mesic/loamy Mesic/y loam/loamy Imperfect TILL O.Rpt 7 No Poor TILL GL.SCpt No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >0.5-2 > Loamy Rapid TILL O.R 48 No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >2-5 > Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 70 No DJS Ridge Upland Toe >30-45 < Mesic/coarse Very rapid GLFL O.Rpt 5 No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >5-10 > Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 20 No DJS Undulating Other wetland Depression Mesic/fine y loam Very poor TILL GL.TCpt 53 No DJS Undulating Upland Crest Loamy Well TILL OD.TC 36 No A-1
4 Table A-1 Summary of Soil and Terrain Data Collected, 2013 Site Name Easting GPS Location Northing Surface Expression Landform Slope Position Percent Slope Slope Length (m) Peat/LFH Depth (cm) Topsoil Depth (cm) Soil Texture Drainage Parent Material (a) Subgroup Code (b) Depth to Bedrock (m) Sampled DJS Ridge Upland Crest >2-5 < Coarse Very rapid GLFL O.HR Yes DJS Undulating Upland Crest Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 30 Yes DJS Undulating Upland Upper >2-5 > Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 36 Yes DJS Undulating Other wetland Lower >2-5 < Fibric/loam Poor TILL GL.TCpt Yes DJS Undulating Upland Mid >15-30 > Loamy Well TILL O.DYBct Yes DJS Inclined Other wetland Depression Fibric/loamy Imperfect TILL GL.SCpt Yes DJS Undulating Upland Crest Loamy Well TILL R.TC 76 Yes DJS Inclined Other wetland Lower >5-10 < Folic Imperfect O HE.FO 26 No DJS Inclined Riparian shoreline Toe >2-5 < Fibric/loamy /coarse y loam Imperfect TILL O.Gpt 45 No DJS Inclined Upland Toe >5-10 > Folic Imperfect O HE.FO 14 No DJS Undulating Upland Crest N/a Rapid R non-soil/rock No DJS Undulating Upland Upper >2-5 < Loamy Rapid TILL O.DYB 13 No DJS Undulating Upland Lower >0.5-2 < Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 19 No DJS Undulating Other wetland Depression Fibric Poor TILL GL.TCpt No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >2-5 < Loamy Rapid TILL R.TC 8 No DJS Undulating Upland Mid >5-10 > Loamy Rapid TILL OD.TC 30 No DJS Undulating Upland Upper >0.5-2 > Loamy Rapid TILL R.TC 43 No Note: GPS locations in NAD 83 Zone 12W. a) GLFL = glaciofluvial; TILL = glacial till; O = Organic; R = Rock. b) See Table A-2a for Soil Subgroup code descriptions. GPS = global positioning system; NAD = North American Datum; LFH = leaf folic humic; m = metre; cm = centimetre; > = greater than; < = less than; = not applicable. A-2
5 Table A-2a Soil Subgroup Code Descriptions Order Subgroup Code Full Subgroup Name Cryosolic Brunisolic Gleysolic Organic Regosolic GL.TCpt GL.SCpt OD.TC R.TC O.DYB O.DYBct O.Gpt R.G R.Gct HE.FO T.F T.M O.HR O.R O.Rpt Peaty Gleyed Turbic Cryosol Peaty Gleyed Static Cryosol Orthic Dystric Turbic Cryosol Regosolic Turbic Cryosol Orthic Dystric Brunisol Cryoturbated Orthic Dystric Brunisol Peaty Orthic Gleysol Rego Gleysol Cryoturbated Rego Gleysol Hemic Folisol Terric Fibrisol Terric Mesisol Orthic Humic Regosol Orthic Regosol Peaty Orthic Regosol A-3
6 Table A-2b Soil Horizon Symbol Definitions Symbol Major Mineral Horizon Symbol (a) A B C Definition This mineral horizon forms at or near the surface in the zone of leaching or eluviation of materials in solution or suspension, or of maximum in situ accumulation of organic matter or both. This mineral horizon is characterized by enrichment in organic matter, sesquioxides, or clay; or, by the development of soil structure; or, by a change of colour denoting hydrolysis, reduction, or oxidation. This mineral horizon is comparatively unaffected by the pedogenic processes operating in A and B horizons. Lowercase Mineral Horizon Suffix g h j m y z 1 A horizon characterized by gray colours, or prominent mottling, or both, indicating permanent or periodic intense reduction. A horizon enriched with organic matter. A modifier used to denote an expression of, but failure to meet, the specified limits of the suffix it modifies. A horizon slightly altered by hydrolysis, oxidation, or solution, or all three to give a change in colour or structure, or both. A horizon affected by cryoturbation as shown by disrupted and broken horizons, incorporation of materials from other horizons, and mechanical sorting in at least half of the cross section of the pedon. A frozen layer. Uppermost subdivision is indicated by the numeral 1; each successive subdivision with depth is indicated by the next numeral. A second subdivision is indicated by the numeral 2; each successive subdivision with depth is indicated by the next 2 numeral. Major Organic Horizon Symbol (b) Organic horizon developed mainly from mosses, rushes, and woody materials, and divided into the following O subhorizons. Organic Subhorizon Code Of Om This O horizon consists largely of fibric materials that are readily identifiable as to botanical origin. A fibric horizon has 40% or more of rubbed fiber by volume and a pyrophosphate index of 5 or more. Fibric material usually is classified on the von Post scale of decomposition as class 1 to class 4. This O horizon consists of mesic material, which is at a stage of decomposition intermediate between fibric and humic materials. The material is partly altered both physically and biochemically. It has a rubbed fiber content ranging from 10% to less than 40%, and has a pyrophosphate index of >3 and <5. Mesic material usually is classified on the von Post scale of decomposition as class 5 or 6. Source: SCWG (1998). a) Mineral horizons contain 17% or less organic carbon (about 30% organic matter) by weight. b) Organic horizons occur in organic soils and commonly at the surface of mineral soils. They may occur at any depth beneath the surface in buried soils or overlying geologic deposits. They contain more than 17% organic carbon (about 30% or more organic matter) by weight. Two groups of these horizons are recognized, the O horizons (peat materials) and the L, F, and H horizons (folic materials). % = percent; < = less than; > = greater than. A-4
7 Table A-3 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Brunisolic Soils (Upland) within the Baseline Study Area Part A DJS004 (O.DYB) DJS005 (O.DYB) DJS006 (O.DYBct) DJS007 (O.DYBct) DJS020 (O.DYB) Of Bm Of Bm Of Bm Cy Of Bmy C Of Bm C Parameter Unit Detection Limit 5-0 cm 0-15 cm 5-0 cm 0-17 cm 5-0 cm 0-28 cm cm 7-0 cm 0-24 cm cm 6-0 cm 0-31 cm cm ph (e) ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l < <5.0 < < Calcium(Ca) mg/l < < <0.50 < <0.50 < < Potassium (K) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 Magnesium (Mg) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < < <0.50 < <0.50 < < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m 0.10 <0.10 < < <0.10 < <0.10 < < Sodium adsorption (f) SAR <0.60 Incalculable <0.20 Incalculable <0.30 Incalculable Incalculable <0.30 Incalculable <0.70 < ratio (SAR) Percent saturation % Cation exchange capacity meq/100g Inorganic carbon % < < <0.10 Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < < <0.80 Stoniness class (g) - S5 -- S5 -- S S S Stone content % Moist consistency - Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Texture (h) - Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy a) See Part B. b) See Part B. c) See Part B. d) See Part B. e) Brunisolic soils were classified to the great group level based on the adjusted soil ph of the B horizon determined using saturated paste ph, which is approximately 0.5 units higher than the generally accepted CaCl 2 ph (Minasny et al. 2011). f) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. g) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01 to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1 to 3%); S3 = very stony (3 to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15 to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). h) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-5
8 Table A-3 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Brunisolic Soils (Upland) within the Baseline Study Area Part B DJS022 (O.DYB) DJS037 (O.DYBct) Brunisolic - Baseline Summary (n=7) Of Bm C (a) Of Bmyj C (b) O (n=7) B (n=7) C (n=3) Parameter Unit Detection Limit 9-0 cm 0-26 cm cm 5-0 cm 0-25 cm cm Min Max or Dominant (c)(d) SD (d) Min Max or Dominant (c)(d) SD (d) Min Max or Dominant (c)(d) SD (d) ph (e) ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l < < Calcium(Ca) mg/l < < <0.50 <0.50 < < < Potassium (K) mg/l < < <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l < < <0.50 <0.50 < < < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m < < <0.10 <0.10 < < < Sodium adsorption (f) SAR <0.20 Incalculable < < Incalculable < < ratio (SAR) Percent saturation % Cation exchange capacity meq/100g Inorganic carbon % < < < Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < < < Stoniness class (g) - S S S3 to S5 Stone content % Moist consistency - Loose Loose Very friable Very friable Very friable and loose Texture (h) - Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy a) Horizons less than 5 cm deep were not sampled. b) Horizon not sampled because of high coarse fragment. c) Range is identified for stoniness class; dominant value is identified for moist consistency and texture; mean is identified for all other parameters. d) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. e) Brunisolic soils were classified to the great group level based on the adjusted soil ph of the B horizon determined using saturated paste ph, which is approximately 0.5 units higher than the generally accepted CaCl 2 ph (Minasny et al. 2011). f) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. g) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01 to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1 to 3%); S3 = very stony (3 to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15 to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). h) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; SD = standard deviation; n = number of sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. Very friable and loose A-6
9 Table A-4 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Regosolic Soils (Uplands) in the Baseline Study Area DJS012 (O.R) DJS018 (O.Rpt) DJS015 (O.HR) DJS033 (O.HR) Regosolic - Baseline Summary (n=4) Of C Of C Ah C Ah C O (n=2) A (n=2) C (n=4) Parameter Unit Detection Limit 5-0 cm 0-35 cm 15-0 cm 0-23 cm 0-16 cm cm 0-16 cm cm Min Max or Dominant (a)(b) Min Max or Dominant (a)(b) Min Max or Dominant (a)(b) SD (b) ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l < < Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l < <5.0 < < < < < Calcium (Ca) mg/l < <0.50 <0.50 < < < <0.50 <0.50 < Potassium (K) mg/l < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < Salinity (Electrical Conductivity) ds/m < <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < <0.10 < <0.10 <0.10 < Sodium Adsorption (c) SAR <0.30 <0.80 <0.30 <0.40 Incalculable Incalculable <0.40 Incalculable <0.30 < Incalculable <0.40 Incalculable Incalculable <0.80 Incalculable -- Ratio (SAR) Percent Saturation % Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g < < Inorganic Carbon % < <0.10 <0.10 < < < Calcium Carbonate (CaCO 3 ) Equivalent % <0.80 <0.80 < < Stoniness Class (d) - S4 -- S5 -- S5 -- S5 -- S4 S5 S4 to S S5 Stone Content % Moist Consistency - Very friable Loose Loose Loose Loose Loose Loose Texture (e) - Loamy Loamy Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Loose and very friable Loamy and coarse a) Range is identified for stoniness class; dominant value is identified for moist consistency and texture; mean is identified for all other parameters. b) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. c) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. d) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01 to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1 to 3%); S3 = very stony (3 to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15 to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). e) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; SD = standard deviation; n = number of sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-7
10 Table A-5 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Cryosolic Soils (Uplands) in the Baseline Study Area Part A Parameter Unit Detection Limit DJS009 (OD.TC) DJS013 (OD.TC) DJS034 (OD.TC) DJS035 (OD.TC) DJS039 (R.TC) DJS014 (R.TC) DJS016 (R.TC) DJS017 (R.TC) Of Bmy Of (a) Bmy Of Bmy Of Bmyj (a) C Of (a) Cy Of (a) Cgy Of Cy Of Cy 7-0 cm 0-22 cm 3-0 cm 0-31 cm 6-0 cm 0-30 cm 6-0 cm 0-5 cm 5-36 cm 3-0 cm 0-76 cm 3-0 cm 0-60 cm 9-0 cm 0-53 cm 5-0 cm 0-28 cm ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l < Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l < < < < Calcium (Ca) mg/l < < < < < Potassium (K) mg/l < < < < < < <0.50 Magnesium (Mg) mg/l < < < < < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < < <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m < < < < < Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (d) SAR <0.40 Incalculable -- Incalculable <0.20 Incalculable Incalculable <0.30 <0.20 < Percent saturation % ,780 (g) , Cation exchange capacity meq/100g Inorganic carbon % < < <0.10 Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < Stoniness class (e) - S5 -- S3 -- S5 -- S S4 -- S3 -- S4 -- S4 -- Stone content % Moist consistency - Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Very friable Non-sticky Very friable Loose Texture (f) - Sandy loam Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy Loamy a) Horizons equal to or less than 5 cm deep were not sampled. b) See Part B. c) See Part B. d) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. e) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01% to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1% to 3%); S3 = very stony (3% to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15% to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). f) From field observations. g) The Cy horizon sample from DJS039 was non-modal and was excluded from the mean and standard deviation calculations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; SD = standard deviation; n = number sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-8
11 Table A-5 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Cryosolic Soils (Uplands) in the Baseline Study Area Part B Upland Cryosolic - Baseline Summary (n=7) O (n=5) B (n=3) C (n=3) Parameter Unit Detection Limit Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l <5.0 <5.0 < Calcium (Ca) mg/l <0.50 <0.50 < Potassium (K) mg/l <0.50 <0.50 < < < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l <0.50 <0.50 < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < < < Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m <0.10 <0.10 < < Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) (d) SAR < Incalculable Incalculable Incalculable -- < Percent saturation % , , , (g) 6.0 (g) Cation exchange capacity meq/100g inorganic carbon % < < calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < Stoniness class (e) S3 to S5 -- stone content % Moist consistency Very friable Texture (f) Sandy loam and loamy Very friable and non-sticky Loamy a) See Part A. b) Range is identified for stoniness class; dominant value is identified for moist consistency and texture; mean is identified for all other parameters. c) The standard, accepted approach for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. d) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. e) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01% to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1% to 3%); S3 = very stony (3% to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15% to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). f) From field observations. g) The Cy horizon sample from DJS039 was non-modal and was excluded from the mean and standard deviation calculations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; SD = standard deviation; n = number sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-9
12 Table A-6 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Peaty Cryosolic Soils and Organic (Wetlands) in the Baseline Study Area Part A DJS008 (GL.SCpt) DJS010 (GL.SCpt) DJS036 (GL.TCpt) DJS038 (GL.SCpt) DJS021 (T.F) DJS024 (T.M) Of Cgz (a) Of Cg1 Cg2 Cgz Of Cgy Cgz Of Cg Cgz Of Cg Cgz Of Om Parameter Unit Detection Limit 38-0 cm 0-10 cm 15-0 cm 0-15 cm cm 50 + cm 28-0 cm 0-15 cm 15 + cm 17-0 cm 0-52 cm 52 + cm 0-62 cm cm 65 + cm 0-8 cm 8-48 cm ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l 5.0 < <5.0 < <5.0 Calcium (Ca) mg/l Potassium (K) mg/l <0.50 < <0.50 < < < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l <0.50 < < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 < <0.50 < < Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m 0.10 < <0.10 <0.10 < < < < Sodium adsorption ratio (d) SAR < <0.40 < < < < <0.50 (SAR) percent saturation % 1.0 2, , ,280 Cation exchange capacity meq/100g Inorganic carbon % < < Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < < Stoniness class (e) - S0 -- S S S S S3 -- stone content % Moist consistency - Slightly sticky Texture (f) - Silt Non-sticky Very friable Friable Very friable Non-sticky Fine y loam Fine y loam Loam Loamy Loamy a) Cgz horizon was frozen and a sufficient quantity of sample could not be collected. b) See Part B. c) See Part B. d) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. e) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01% to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1% to 3%); S3 = very stony (3% to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15% to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). f) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; SD = standard deviation; n = number sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-10
13 Table A-6 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Peaty Cryosolic Soils and Organic (Wetlands) in the Baseline Study Area Part B Peaty Cryosolic and Organic Baseline Summary (n=6) O (n=6) C (n=4) Parameter Unit Detection Limit Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD(c) Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l 5.0 < < Calcium (Ca) mg/l Potassium (K) mg/l 0.50 < < < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l < < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 < < <0.50 <0.50 < Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m 0.10 < < < Sodium adsorption ratio (d) SAR < < < < (SAR) percent saturation % ,980 1,075 1, Cation exchange capacity meq/100g Inorganic carbon % < < Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % < Stoniness class (e) - S0 -- S0 to S3 -- Stone content % Moist consistency - Texture (f) - Non sticky, very friable, and friable Fine y loam, loam and loamy a) See Part A. b) Range is identified for stoniness class; dominant value is identified for moist consistency and texture; mean is identified for all other parameters. c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. d) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. e) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01% to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1% to 3%); S3 = very stony (3% to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15% to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). f) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; SD = standard deviation; n = number sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decissemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-11
14 Table A-7 Results of Soil Chemistry and Other Soil Properties for Determining Reclamation Suitability of Gleysolic Soils (Wetland) in the Baseline Study Area DJS011 (R.Gct) DJS019 (R.G) DJS023 (R.G) Gleysolic - Baseline Summary (n=3) Of Cgy (a) Cg (a) Of Cg Of Cg O (n=3) C (n=3) Parameter Unit Detection Limit 8-0 cm 0-35 cm cm 6-0 cm cm 6-0 cm 0-64 cm Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) Min Max or Dominant (b)(c) SD (c) ph ph units Chloride (Cl) mg/l < < Sulphur (as SO 4 ) mg/l 5.0 <5.0 < < < Calcium (Ca) mg/l < < < <0.50 <0.50 < Potassium (K) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < < < < <0.50 <0.50 < Magnesium (Mg) mg/l < < < <0.50 <0.50 < Sodium (Na) mg/l 0.50 <0.50 < <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < < <0.50 <0.50 < Salinity (electrical conductivity) ds/m 0.10 <0.10 < < < <0.10 <0.11 < Sodium adsorption ratio (d) SAR Incalculable Incalculable -- < < <0.30 <0.40 < Incalculable (SAR) percent saturation % , ,550 1,360 1, Cation exchange capacity meq/100g inorganic carbon % < < Calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) equivalent % Stoniness class (e) - S S0 -- S3 -- S0 S3 S0 to s3 -- Stone content % Moist consistency - Loose Loose Non-sticky Non-sticky Texture (f) - Sandy loam Sandy loam Loamy Loamy Loose and non-sticky Loamy and y loam a) The Cgy horizon was sampled to represent C horizon chemistry at DJS011. The Cg horizon was too saturated to sample. b) Range is identified for stoniness class; dominant value is identified for moist consistency and texture; mean is identified for all other parameters. c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard. d) Sodium adsorption ratio is incalculable where sodium (Na) concentrations are below detection limits. e) Stoniness class is the estimation of the average severity of surface stones where: S0 = non-stony (<0.01%); S1 = slightly stony (0.01% to 0.1%); S2 = moderately stony (0.1% to 3%); S3 = very stony (3% to 15%); S5 = exceedingly stony (15% to 50%); S6 = excessively stony (>50%). f) From field observations. ph = potential of hydrogen, provides measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution on a scale of 0 to 14; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; SD = standard deviation; n = number sampled; cm = centimetre; mg/l = milligrams per litre; ds/m = decisiemens per metre; meq/100 g = milliequivalents of ammonium cation (NH + 4 ) adsorbed by 100 grams of dry soil; % = percent; < = below detection limit of; = not applicable; - = no unit; -- = not measured. A-12
15 Table A-8 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Brunisolic Soils Sampled, 2013 DJS004 (O.DYB) DJS005 (O.DYB) DJS006 (O.DYBct) DJS007 (O.DYBct) DJS020 (O.DYB) DJS022 (O.DYB) DJS037 (O.DYBct) Analyte Unit (a) Limit Detection CSQG (b) Bm Bm Bm Bmy Bm Bm Bmyj Baseline Summary (n=7) 0-15 cm 0-17 cm 0-28 cm 0-24 cm 0-31 cm 0-26 cm 0-25 cm Min Max Mean (c) SD (c) Aluminum mg/kg 50 10,200 9,170 9,910 9,380 14,700 13,200 11,100 9,170 14,700 11,094 2,093 Antimony mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < Bismuth mg/kg 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Cadmium mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Calcium mg/kg ,380 1,500 1,290 1,190 1, ,500 1, Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg 50 11,900 11,000 12,900 12,300 18,800 18,500 12,300 11,000 18,800 13,957 3,258 Lead mg/kg Lithium mg/kg Magnesium mg/kg 100 3,480 3,060 4,290 4,460 7,070 5,990 5,190 3,060 7,070 4,791 1,406 Manganese mg/kg Mercury mg/kg < < Molybdenum mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Nickel mg/kg Phosphorus mg/kg Potassium mg/kg 100 1,130 1,260 2,360 2,480 4,940 3,530 2,860 1,130 4,940 2,651 1,318 Selenium mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Silver mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Sodium mg/kg < < Strontium mg/kg Thallium mg/kg <0.10 < < Tin mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 < Titanium mg/kg Uranium mg/kg Vanadium mg/kg Zinc mg/kg Note: Values in bold are those that exceed Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines (CCME 2013). See Table A-2a for Soil Subgroup Code Descriptions and Table A-2b for Soil Horizon Symbol Definitions. a) Per kilogram of dry weight. b) Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health for Residential/Parkland Areas (CCME 2013). c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. CSQG = Canadian Soil Quality Guideline; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number sampled; SD = standard deviation; cm = centimetre; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; = not applicable; < = below detection limit of; - = not calculated. A-13
16 Table A-9 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Cryosolic Soils Sampled, 2013 Analyte Unit (a) Limit Detection CSQG (b) DJS009 (OD.TC) DJS013 (OD.TC) DJS034 (OD.TC) DJS035 (OD.TC) DJS010 (GL.SCpt) DJS036 (GL.TCpt) DJS038 (GL.SCpt) DJS014 (R.TC) Bmy Bmy Bmy C (c) Cg Cgy Cg Cgy Cy Cy Cy Baseline Summary (n=11) 0-22 cm 0-31 cm 0-30 cm 5-36 cm 0-15 cm 0-15 cm 0-52 cm 0-60 cm 0-53 cm 0-28 cm 0-76 cm Min Max Mean (d) SD (d) DJS016 (R.TC) DJS017 (R.TC) DJS039 (R.TC) Aluminum mg/kg ,700 10,200 10,200 10,100 15,000 9,680 12,000 9,020 13,300 13,900 3,100 3,100 15,000 10,655 3,157 Antimony mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 < Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50 < Bismuth mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 < Cadmium mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < < Calcium mg/kg ,580 1,610 1,610 1, ,510 1,120 4, ,590 1,575 1,046 Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg ,800 13,300 13,500 13,700 15,700 12,800 14,000 11,900 17,600 19,200 9,230 9,230 19,200 13,885 2,775 Lead mg/kg Lithium mg/kg <4.0 < Magnesium mg/kg ,400 4,690 4,380 5,120 7,720 4,430 5,270 4,160 8,450 9,520 1,870 1,870 9,520 5,455 2,218 Manganese mg/kg Mercury mg/kg < Molybdenum mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 < Nickel mg/kg Phosphorus mg/kg Potassium mg/kg ,780 2,490 2,510 2,840 3,990 2,370 1,630 2,940 3,730 4, ,120 2, Selenium mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 < Silver mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 < Sodium mg/kg < <100 < Strontium mg/kg Thallium mg/kg <0.20 < Tin mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0 < Titanium mg/kg , , Uranium mg/kg Vanadium mg/kg Zinc mg/kg a) Per kilogram of dry weight. b) Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health for Residential/Parkland Areas (CCME 2013). c) The C horizon was sampled because the B horizon was too rocky and shallow to sample. d) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. CSQG = Canadian Soil Quality Guideline; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number sampled; SD = standard deviation; cm = centimetre; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; = not applicable; < = below detection limit of; - = not calculated. A-14
17 Table A-10 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Regosolic Soils Sampled, 2013 DJS012 (O.R) DJS018 (O.Rpt) DJS015 (O.HR) DJS033 (O.HR) Analyte Unit (a) Detection Limit CSQG (b) C C Ah Ah Baseline Summary (n=4) 0-35 cm 0-23 cm 0-16 cm 0-16 cm Min Max Mean (c) SD (c) Aluminum mg/kg 50 11,600 12,300 11,800 13,300 11,600 13,300 12, Antimony mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < Bismuth mg/kg 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Cadmium mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Calcium mg/kg 100 1, , ,530 1, Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg 50 16,200 16,700 15,200 17,300 15,200 17,300 16, Lead mg/kg Lithium mg/kg Magnesium mg/kg 100 6,570 5,980 5,510 6,440 5,510 6,570 6, Manganese mg/kg Mercury mg/kg < < Molybdenum mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Nickel mg/kg Phosphorus mg/kg Potassium mg/kg 100 3,780 3,920 2,990 3,610 2,990 3,920 3, Selenium mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Silver mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Sodium mg/kg Strontium mg/kg Thallium mg/kg Tin mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 < Titanium mg/kg Uranium mg/kg Vanadium mg/kg Zinc mg/kg a) Per kilogram of dry weight. b) Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health for Residential/Parkland Areas (CCME 2013). c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. CSQG = Canadian Soil Quality Guideline; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number sampled; SD = standard deviation; cm = centimetre; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; = not applicable; < = below detection limit of; - = not calculated. A-15
18 Table A-11 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloids and Non-Metals) Chemistry for Gleysolic Soils Sampled, 2013 DJS011 (R.Gct) DJS019 (R.G) DJS023 (R.G) Analyte Unit (a) Detection Limit CSQG (b) Cgy Cg Cg Baseline Summary (n=3) 0-35 cm cm 0-64 cm Min Max Mean (c) SD (c) Aluminum mg/kg 50 7,490 10,500 13,100 7,490 13,100 10,363 2,807 Antimony mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 < Bismuth mg/kg 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Cadmium mg/kg <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 < Calcium mg/kg ,440 1, ,440 1, Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg 50 8,120 13,000 17,300 8,120 17,300 12,807 4,593 Lead mg/kg Lithium mg/kg Magnesium mg/kg 100 3,610 4,730 6,230 3,610 6,230 4,857 1,315 Manganese mg/kg Mercury mg/kg < < < < Molybdenum mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 < Nickel mg/kg Phosphorus mg/kg Potassium mg/kg 100 1,830 2,760 4,360 1,830 4,360 2,983 1,280 Selenium mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Silver mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 < Sodium mg/kg 100 < < Strontium mg/kg Thallium mg/kg < < Tin mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 < Titanium mg/kg Uranium mg/kg Vanadium mg/kg Zinc mg/kg a) Per kilogram of dry weight. b) Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health for Residential/Parkland Areas (CCME 2013). c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. CSQG = Canadian Soil Quality Guideline; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number sampled; SD = standard deviation; cm = centimetre; SD = standard deviation; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; = not applicable; < = below detection limit of; - = not calculated. A-16
19 Table A-12 Baseline Metal (Including Metalloid and Non-Metal) Chemistry for Organic Materials Sampled, 2013 DJS021 (T.F) DJS024 (T.M) DJS008 (GL.SCpt) Analyte Unit (a) Detection Limit CSQG (b) Of Of/Om Of Baseline Summary (n=3) 0-62 cm 0-48 cm 38-0 cm Min Max Mean (c) SD (c) Aluminum mg/kg , , ,810 2,900 3,424 Antimony mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.50 <0.20 < Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg/kg Beryllium mg/kg <1.0 <1.0 <2.5 <1.0 < Bismuth mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <5.0 <2.0 < Cadmium mg/kg <0.20 <0.50 <0.20 < Calcium mg/kg ,830 1,440 2,690 1,440 2,690 1, Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg <2.0 <5.0 <2.0 < Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg , , ,440 2,857 3,162 Lead mg/kg <2.0 <5.0 <2.0 < Lithium mg/kg <4.0 <10 <4.0 < Magnesium mg/kg , ,950 1, Manganese mg/kg Mercury mg/kg < Molybdenum mg/kg <2.0 <2.0 <5.0 <2.0 < Nickel mg/kg Phosphorus mg/kg Potassium mg/kg < Selenium mg/kg <0.40 <0.40 <1.0 <0.40 < Silver mg/kg <0.40 <0.40 <1.0 <0.40 < Sodium mg/kg <200 <200 <500 <200 < Strontium mg/kg Thallium mg/kg <0.20 <0.20 <0.50 <0.20 < Tin mg/kg <4.0 <4.0 <10 <4.0 < Titanium mg/kg Uranium mg/kg <0.20 <0.50 < Vanadium mg/kg <2.0 <5.0 < Zinc mg/kg a) Per kilogram of dry weight. b) Canadian Soil Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Environmental and Human Health for Residential/Parkland Areas (CCME 2013). c) The standard, accepted approach used for cases where 50% or less of the data were below detection limits was to use half of the detection limit value in calculations of mean and standard deviation. CSQG = Canadian Soil Quality Guideline; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number sampled; SD = standard deviation; cm = centimetre; SD = standard deviation; mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram; = not applicable; < = below detection limit of; - = not calculated. A-17
Understanding your results Acidity... 3 Aluminium... 3 Base saturation... 3 Boron... 4 Bulk density... 4 Calcium... 4 Cations...
Understanding your results Acidity... 3 Aluminium.... 3 Base saturation... 3 Boron... 4 Bulk density... 4 Calcium... 4 Cations... 4 CEC - Cation Exchange Capacity... 4 Copper... 5 Conductivity... 6 Deficiencies...
More informationSoil Composition. Air
Soil Composition Air Soil Included Air Approximately 40 to 60% of the volume of a soil is actually empty space between the solid particles (voids). These voids are filled with air and/or water. The air
More informationNUTRIENT AND HEAVY METAL CONTENTS OF HOG MANURE - EFFECT ON SOIL QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY
NUTRIENT AND HEAVY METAL CONTENTS OF HOG MANURE - EFFECT ON SOIL QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY G.J. Racz and M.M. Fitzgerald Professor and Research Associate, respectively, Department of Soil Science, University
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 8
Bottom Ash Data 2019 Week 8 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on March 6, 2019. The data represents bottom ash composite results for week
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 49
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 49 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on December 20, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 30
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 30 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on August 14, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 37
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 37 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on October 2, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 12
Bottom Ash Data 2019 Week 12 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on April 11, 2019. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 1
Bottom Ash Data 2019 Week 1 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on January 17, 2019. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 38
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 38 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on October 4, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 40
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 40 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on October 25, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 17
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 17 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on May 16, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for week
More informationBottom Ash Data Week 9
Bottom Ash Data 2018 Week 9 The following analytical report was sent to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy on March 26, 2018. The data represents bottom ash composite results for week
More informationGREEN 3 Date Date Sample Sample B067921C Received: 15/08/2013 Reported: 20/08/2013 Reference: Green 3 Number: SBA1674 CROP: Cool Season
Your Simplot Partners Branch Address & Contact Details Your Reps Name & Contact Details ABC GOLF CLUB (SAMPLE ONLY) GREEN Date Date Sample Sample B9C Received: /8/ Reported: /8/ Reference: Green Number:
More informationCompost Analysis. Sustainable Soil Management with the Mikhail Balance System
Tel: +61 3 9701 6007 Fax: +61 3 9701 5712 ABN: 26 005 031 569 www.swep.com.au Compost Analysis Sustainable Soil Management with the Mikhail Balance System FILE NO : 1703124769 DATE ISSUED : 15/03/2017
More informationInterpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K
Interpreting Soils Report Beyond N P K What we will cover We will not discuss Macro Nutrients Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium. We will touch on Secondary Nutrients Magnesium, Calcium and Sulfur. We
More informationTOXIC AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS
TOXIC AND ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS Assessment of Key Minerals and Harmful Metals Whole Blood, Red Blood Cell and Serum Elements Urine Toxic and Essential Elements Creatinine Clearance Hair Elements Fecal Metals
More information10. TRACE ELEMENTS Introduction. Trace Elements Bristol Bay Drainages
10. TRACE ELEMENTS 10.1 Introduction The trace element studies in the Bristol Bay drainages study areas were conducted to acquire baseline data on naturally occurring constituents in upland soil, terrestrial
More informationUnderstanding a Soil Report
Understanding a Soil Report AGRONOMY SOIL ANALYSIS 1. Soil ph Soil ph is a measure of the acidity in the soil. An acidic soil has a greater amount of hydrogen (H+) ions and a ph below 7.0. Values above
More informationWelcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories
Welcome Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories Discussion Soil test levels Dropping P,K Organic matter levels dropping Cost of Fertilizer Increasing due to Global Demand Environmental
More informationFigure 1. Location of 43 benchmark sites across Alberta.
1.0 INTRODUCTION This report describes the micronutrient and trace element status of the AESA (Alberta Environmentally Sustainable Agriculture) Soil Quality Benchmark Sites. Previous reports completed
More informationDETERMINATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATERS AND WASTES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA - MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA Method (Revision 5.
DETERMINATION OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN WATERS AND WASTES BY INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA - MASS SPECTROMETRY EPA Method 200.8 (Revision 5.4, 1994) Table 1A. Summary of Holding Times and Preservation for Trace
More informationAppendix D: Aerobic and Anaerobic Leaching Tests
Appendix D: Aerobic and Anaerobic Leaching Tests This appendix contains the entire data set for the aerobic and anaerobic testing. Testing was performed for the potential components of the final media
More informationTrace Elements in Manure
Trace Elements in Manure Purpose: Whenever soil profiles are examined for nutrient trace elements, it has been demonstrated that the metals tend to accumulate in the topsoil. Soil properties affect plant
More information1101 S Winchester Blvd., Ste. G 173 San Jose, CA (408) (408) fax Page 1 of 2
San Jose Office September 28, 2018 Report 18-262-0106 Zanker Landscape Mateirals 675 Los Esteros Road San Jose, CA 95134 Attn: Beto Ochoa RE: ZB-PPM Reaction at 7.5 is slightly alkaline and with lime absent
More informationSoil and Plant Testing Nutrient Budgets
SoilCare Managing Soil for Healthy, Resilient, Productive Pastures Soil and Plant Testing Nutrient Budgets Graham Lancaster (Manager Environmental Analysis Laboratory) graham.lancaster@scu.edu.au EAL Background
More informationCompost Analysis. Sustainable Soil Management with the Mikhail Balance System
Tel: +61 3 9701 6007 Fax: +61 3 9701 5712 ABN: 26 005 031 569 www.swep.com.au Compost Analysis Sustainable Soil Management with the Mikhail Balance System FILE NO : 1504110993 DATE ISSUED : 28/04/2015
More informationSoil Testing and Interpretation
Introduction Soil testing, interpretation of the test results, and incorporating prescriptive remedies to improve soils should be a fundamental part of any reclamation or revegetation project. Without
More informationSlide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3
Slide 1 Feel free to contact me: Dr. Jim Walworth Walworth@ag.arizona.edu (520) 626-3364 Additional material is available at: http://ag.arizona.edu/swes/soil_fertility/ Slide 2 Slide 3 Slide 4 First, we
More informationMulti Analyte Custom Grade Solution
1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION INORGANIC VENTURES is accredited to ISO Guide 34, "General Requirements for the Competence of Reference Material Producers" and ISO/IEC 17025, "General Requirements for
More informationAAFCO Check Sample 2015 Minerals Program. A Targeted and Engineered Concentration Program
AAFC Check Sample 215 Minerals Program A Targeted and Engineered Concentration Program Approach: 16 Target Elements This quarterly program focuses on minerals of health and toxicological importance in
More informationAnalyte Proficiency From All Labs # Analytes: 26 Sample # Statistical Summary # Labs Reporting: 82 Urea Issue Date : 06/30/2016
Analyte Proficiency From All Labs # Analytes: 26 Sample # 160511 Statistical Summary # Labs Reporting: 82 Urea Issue Date : 06/30/2016 Analyte Code Analyte # Tests Submitted # Tests in Robust Calculations
More informationGB Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE
Translated English of Chinese Standard: GB5009.268-2016 www.chinesestandard.net Buy True-PDF Auto-delivery. Sales@ChineseStandard.net GB NATIONAL STANDARD OF THE PEOPLE S REPUBLIC OF CHINA GB 5009.268-2016
More informationEPA Clean Air Act Performance Audit Samples Stationary Source Audit Sample (SSAS) Table Revision 5, Effective April 15, 2014
Matrix EPA Clean Air Act Performance Audit Samples Page 1 of 6 Acceptance Criteria 2 ASRL 3 Inorganics in Impinger Solution EPA Method 6 and 8 4, 5 mg/dscm mg/dscm 4010 Sulfur Dioxide 50-2000 ± 15% at
More informationKelp and Dairy Cattle - a Pilot Study
Kelp and Dairy Cattle - a Pilot Study By Dr. Richard Olree and Dr. Paul Dettloff After observing positive results of kelp in the ration of many transitioning and organic herds, the question remained, what
More informationChinese Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate testing. Dick Camp Kronos Micronutrients
Chinese Zinc Sulfate Monohydrate testing Dick Camp Kronos Micronutrients THE ISSUE Most if not all Chinese ZSM imports are not all ZSM. They are a combination of ZSM and a Non- Water-Soluble compound of
More informationS1AN: Same as test S1A with carryover Nitrogen as Nitrate With Recommendations: $13.20 Without Recommendations: $11.50
AGRICULTURE SOIL SOIL TEST PACKAGES S1A (Basic): Organic Matter, Available Phosphorus, (P1 Weak Bray and P2 Strong Bray) Exchangeable Potassium, Magnesium, Calcium and Hydrogen, Soil ph, Buffer Index,
More informationGreg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories
Welcome Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories Compost Quality Consumer of the Future Population dynamics - more and more people involved in use of compost Better educated on what is expected
More informationSoil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences
Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences C H O P N K 16 ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS Ca S Mg B Cl Cu Fe Mn Mo B NON-MINERAL NUTRIENTS Carbon (C) Hydrogen (H) Oxygen
More informationESSENTIAL TRACE ELEMENTS PREPARED BY B.KIRUTHIGA LECTURER DEPT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY
ESSENTIAL TRACE ELEMENTS PREPARED BY B.KIRUTHIGA LECTURER DEPT OF PHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY Back to Basics: Elements Remember that all matter is made of elements An element is a substance in its simplest
More informationA & L Canada Laboratories Inc Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) Fax: (519)
Report Number: C13114-10169 Account Number: To: ESSEX-WINDSOR SWA 2136 Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) 457-2575 Fax: (519) 457-2664 For: ROW "T2-3-12" 519-776-6370 Reported Date:
More informationATINER s Conference Paper Proceedings Series ECL Athens, 14 December 2017
ATINER s Conference Paper Proceedings Series ECL2017-0029 Athens, 14 December 2017 Influence of Various Factors on the Content of Iodine in the Soils of Western Siberia Galina Konarbaeva and Boris Smolentsev
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: FEEDSTOCKS COMPOSTING METHOD COUNTY C10462 04/27/2018 Analyte COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT (As is basis) Compost Test 3A (Dry weight basis) ph Soluble Salts Solids
More informationCommon Salt Ions. Salinity. Soil permeability reflects sodicity problems from sodium concentrations 1/15/2008
Salinity Water Deficits Ion Toxicities SALT - RELATED PRBLEMS Ion Imbalances Soil Permeability Water deficits reflect salinity problems from salt concentrations Salinity -A measure of the salt concentration
More informationA & L Canada Laboratories Inc Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) Fax: (519)
Report Number: C13304-10888 Account Number: 95000 To: ST.LAWRENCE RIVER INSTITUTE 2 ST.LAWRENCE DRIVE Attn: JEN HALEY 2136 Jetstream Road, London, Ontario, N5V 3P5 Telephone: (519) 457-2575 Fax: (519)
More informationPlant Nutrients in Mineral Soils
The Supply and Availability of Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils Factors Controlling the Growth of Higher Plants 1. Light 2. Mechanical Support. Heat. Air 5. Water 6. Nutrients
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
Analysis Report For: Copy To: Merlyn Akhtar Ulster County Resource Recovery Agency LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: FEEDSTOCKS COMPOSTING METHOD COUNTY C09238 01/13/2017 Finished Compost Static
More informationLeaving at 8:30 am Be prepared for a little mud!
Field Trip Overview Day trip to Tyson Research Center on Saturday Leaving at 8:30 am from bus drop by Mallinckrodt Center Don t be late!!! You cannot enter the site if you drive there on your own Forecast:
More informationPOTENTIALLY g Head Brown Dye Normal V010.08
DCCTOR5_D/!TA SEX: Female AGE: 42 14 Druid Ave Stirling, Sa, - 5152 AUSTRALIA TOXIC RESULT POTENTIALLY REFERENCE RANGE Aluminum 2.5 7. 0 Antimony
More informationSoils and Soil Fertility Management
Soils and Soil Fertility Management Mark L. McFarland Professor and Soil Fertility Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service College Station, Texas Four Principal Components of Soil Air Mineral Solid
More informationA reliable, practical and easy-to-use Determination of Soil Conductivity and Salt Content with TRIME Probes
A reliable, practical and easy-to-use Determination of Soil Conductivity and Salt Content with TRIME Probes IMKO s TRIME TDR-probes can now report soil EC as standard simultaneously with soil moisture
More informationProject: TopCal for sodium management during leaching at Mission Viejo Country Club
Project: TopCal for sodium management during leaching at Mission Viejo Country Club Principal investigator: Kevin Hutchins, Mission Viejo Country Club Cooperators: Larry Stowell, Ph.D. and Wendy Gelernter,
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
Analysis Report For: Copy To: Loren Martin Terra-Gro Inc LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: FEEDSTOCKS COMPOSTING METHOD COUNTY C08481 032016 Proselect 4/7/2016 GWD Finished Compost Windrow Lancaster
More informationFACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation
Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation FACT SHEET A & L CANADA LABORATORIES, INC. 2136 Jetstream Rd. London, ON N5V 3P5 Phone: 519-457-2575 Fax: 519-457-2664 Aginfo@alcanada.com www.alcanada.com
More informationDOMOGRAN 45 ACTIVATING YOUR NUTRIENT POTENTIAL THE NITROGEN-SULFUR FERTILIZER FROM LEUNA
DOMOGRAN 45 ACTIVATING YOUR NUTRIENT POTENTIAL THE NITROGEN-SULFUR FERTILIZER FROM LEUNA www.domogran.de DOMOGRAN 45 nitrogen and sulfur fertilizer for positive nutrient dynamics Because of its attraction
More informationTrends in Soil Management for Turf. David C. Smith P.Ag DCS Agronomic Services
Trends in Soil Management for Turf David C. Smith P.Ag DCS Agronomic Services Points for Today s Discussion Soil Testing Considerations Soil test interpretation How water moves in the soil Recommendations
More informationWolf Creek Community Alliance 2009 Soil Sampling Report By BJ Schmitt January 26, 2010
Wolf Creek Community Alliance 2009 Soil Sampling Report By BJ Schmitt January 26, 2010 Introduction: Wolf Creek watershed is located in one of the most heavily gold-mined areas of California. Historical
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
Bob Watts LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: C09017 10/4/2016 Analyte COMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT (As is basis) Compost Test 3A (Dry weight basis) ph Soluble Salts Solids 56.6 % Organic Matter Total
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
Analysis Report For: Copy To: Greg Gelewski OCRRA LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: FEEDSTOCKS COMPOSTING METHOD COUNTY Jamesville 1/2" C06659 9/27/2013 Screened Compost Finished Compost Windrow
More informationEdward V. Krizhanovsky, Ph.D., Kamila B. Tursunova
REPORT ON RESEARCH OF BAE SYNERGY LIQUID PREPARATION INFLUENCE ON MINERAL METABOLISM Edward V. Krizhanovsky, Ph.D., Kamila B. Tursunova Bioenergy Technologies Institute, Sveaborgskaia, 12, Saint- Petersburg,
More informationHAIR ELEMENTS. PATIENT: Number 74 SEX: Female AGE: 49. POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS TOXIC RESULT REFERENCE PERCENTILE ELEMENTS µg/g RANGE 68 th 95 th
HAIR ELEMENTS PATIENT: Number 74 SEX: Female AGE: 49 POTENTIALLY TOXIC ELEMENTS TOXIC RESULT REFERENCE PERCENTILE ELEMENTS µg/g RANGE 68 th 95 th Aluminum 4.2 < 7.0 Antimony 0.027 < 0.050 Arsenic 0.016
More informationCOMPOST ANALYSIS REPORT
Analysis Report For: Erth Products Copy To: Mandy Walls 561 Dogwood Trail Tyrone GA 30290 LAB ID: SAMPLE ID: REPORT DATE: SAMPLE TYPE: FEEDSTOCKS COMPOSTING METHOD COUNTY C07987 Jul 2015 STA 7/30/2015
More informationA & L GREAT LAKES LABORATORIES, INC.
Report No. F10035-0027 59018 3505 Conestoga Drive Fort Wayne, Indiana 46808 260-483-4759 Fax 260-483-5274 Account No. Date Reported: 02/08/2010 SOIL TEST REPORT Page: 1 of 2 Cation Lab Organic Phosphorus
More informationDiscuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a
Andrew Ristvey The University of Maryland Extension programs are open to any person and will not discriminate against anyone because of race, age, sex, color, sexual orientation, physical or mental disability,
More informationWhat Can We Do About Water Quality?
17 What Can We Do About Water Quality? David K. Beede 1 Department of Animal Science The Michigan State University Take Home Messages Abundant, high quality drinking water is the most important essential
More informationNutrient level (EC) in a pot is like a bank
Dirt, Fert and Squirt (1) Supplying Essential Nutrients What are the most common nutritional problems? Too much fertilizer Not enough fertilizer Paul Fisher pfisher@ufl.edu 1 ph too high ph too low 2 Nutrient
More informationFERTILIZER EFFECTS UPON MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION OF THE AVOCADO
California Avocado Society 1959 Yearbook 43: 96-99 FERTILIZER EFFECTS UPON MICRONUTRIENT NUTRITION OF THE AVOCADO C. K. Labanauskas, T. W. Embleton, and W. W. Jones Assistant Horticulturist, Associate
More informationof human hair and nails. Part I. Analytical methodology, Sci. Tot. Environ. 2000, 250/1-3,
Reference data Biomonitoring Trace elements in human biological material References cited below: 1. Rodushkin I., Ödman F., Branth S. Multielement analysis of whole blood by high resolution inductively
More informationDAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS
DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS Dick Wolkowski Extension Soil Scientist Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin - Madison Basic concepts of soil fertility How plants
More informationNutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison
Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison Sources of nutrients available for plant uptake Nutrients in the soil solution are: In ionic form At low concentration
More informationSoil acidity. Kiyoshi Tsutsuki
Soil acidity Kiyoshi Tsutsuki http://timetraveler.html.xdomain.jp H = log (H+) oriba Home page ph and crop growth (vegetables and root crops) Low ph tolerance strong (4.0~5.0) A little strong (4.5~6.0)
More informationBOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen
BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION Segment One Nutrient Listing Plants need 17 elements for normal growth. Carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen are found in air and water. Nitrogen, phosphorus,
More informationTest Report No.T JP Date: FEB 22, 2017 Page 1 of 6
Test Report No.T51710190051JP Date: FEB 22, 2017 Page 1 of 6 JIAN PLASTIC & METAL PRODUCTS LTD NO.3-1, SOUTH GAOBU BLVD, GAOBU TOWN, DONGGUAN CITY, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA,ZIP CODE:523278 The following
More informationTrace element exposure in soils and vegetation of the Gatumba Mining District, Rwanda. Master thesis
Trace element exposure in soils and vegetation of the Gatumba Mining District, Rwanda Master thesis Technical University Braunschweig, Germany Institute of Environmental Science Department of Soil science
More informationGrinder-Pedersen L, Rasmussen SE, Bugel S, Jorgensen LV, Dragsted LO, Gundersen V, Sandstrom B.
1. Organic vs. Commercially Grown Fruits and Vegetables. 2. Effect of diets based on foods from conventional versus organic production on intake and excretion of flavonoids and markers of antioxidative
More informationAppendix A - Human Health Risk Assessment
Appendix A - Human Health Risk Assessment Prepared for: Department of Health and Wellness, Government of New Brunswick February 2005 Belledune Area Health Study Table of Contents 1.0 Objectives and rationale...
More informationAVAILABLE Cd CONTENT OF SALT AFFECTED AND NORMAL SOILS OF HALASTRA KALOHORI AREA
Global NEST Journal, Vol 9, No 3, pp 195-200, 2007 Copyright 2007 Global NEST Printed in Greece. All rights reserved AVAILABLE Cd CONTENT OF SALT AFFECTED AND NORMAL SOILS OF HALASTRA KALOHORI AREA TH.
More informationFERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.
FERTILIZING Macadamias need to be fertilized from planting. Although in small quantities it must be done to ensure good growth. The trees do grow slowly and have to be helped to grow bearing wood in as
More informationSTANDARD METHODS FOR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN FOOD OF ANIMAL ORIGIN
EN 13804 Performance criteria, general considerations and sample preparation 2013 EN 13805 Pressure digestion 2014 EN 13806 Determination of mercury by cold-vapour atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS)
More informationRELIABILITY OF SOIL AND PLANT ANALYSES FOR MAKING NUTRIENT RECOMMENDATIONS
RELIABILITY OF SOIL AND PLANT ANALYSES FOR MAKING NUTRIENT RECOMMENDATIONS Robert. O. Miller Soil and Crop Sciences Dept. Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 Phone: 970-686-5702 Fax: 970-491-0564
More informationyears later the time has come to decide what vegetation should be planted. Because the City of Berkeley
Chapter 4 SOIL ANALYSIS OF THE BERKELEY NORTH WATERFRONT PARK Rumall Randhawa In 1983 the Berkeley City Dump was closed, and the process of creating the North Waterfront Park began. A landscape architect
More informationEssential Elements. Original research don by Julius von Sachs 1860 using hydroponics
Essential Elements Original research don by Julius von Sachs 1860 using hydroponics Using various solutions found ones that supported plant life Sachs found several elements that were needed in relatively
More informationUnderstanding Your Soil Report. Michael Cook 2018
Understanding Your Soil Report Michael Cook 2018 Soil Sampling Advantage gives nutrient concentrations may shed light on soil issues baseline so look for trends can be done pre-plant timing not as critical
More informationTRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM
TRACE ELEMENTS IN SERUM Proficiency Test Report Event #, 05 November th, 05 Event #, 05 Serum Aluminum The test materials for serum Al were prepared from human serum obtained from Tennessee Blood Services,
More informationUSER SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUINTOLUBRIC 888 Series DESCRIPTION OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROPERTIES AND THE POSSIBLE VARIATIONS AND TOLERANCES
USER SPECIFICATIONS FOR QUINTOLUBRIC 888 Series OVERVIEW The QUINTOLUBRIC 888 Series of fluids are based on a synthetic organic ester, which is the main base component, plus a number of selected additives
More informationCOMPOST TECHNICAL DATA SHEET
Date Sampled/Received: 18 Dec. 17 / 20 Dec. 17 Central Valley Water Reclamation Facility Tom Holstrom 800 W. Central Valley Road Salt Lake City UT 84119-3379 Product Identification Compost 1/4" Screened
More informationBiosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing. Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup
Biosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup Nutrient Manageme Meet crop nutrient needs Maintain soil quality Conserve resources Protect water quality -- reduc
More informationInterpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations
Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations Ray Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, NE www.wardlab.com Guiding Producers Today to Feed the World Tomorrow www.wardlab.com Saline County
More informationINTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS
Originators of Your Crop's Dieticians 4915 West Monte Cristo Road Edinburg, Texas 78541 Telephone: 956-383-0739 Facsimile: 956-383-0730 INTERPRETATION GUIDE TO SOIL TEST REPORTS TPSL 's Daubeny Carbon
More informationWe are committed to becoming a watershed to Agriculture and restoring it to its rightful place in the economy. This is substantiated through our
We are committed to becoming a watershed to Agriculture and restoring it to its rightful place in the economy. This is substantiated through our ability to Envision the Big Picture and pinpoint the inefficiencies
More information!!"#$%&'!())*+,$-.&(.*/*+,)0&1-$2
PATIENT: Number 924 SEX: Female AGE: 41!!"#$%&'!())*+,$-.&(.*/*+,)0&1-$2 TOXIC METALS RESULT REFERENCE PERCENTILE µg/g INTERVAL 68 th 95 th Aluminum (Al) 3.3 < 7.0 Antimony (Sb) < 0.01 < 0.050 Arsenic
More informationCERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS. tel: fax:
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS 300 Technology Drive Christiansburg, VA 24073. USA inorganicventures.com tel: 800.669.6799. 540.585.3030 fax: 540.585.3012 info@inorganicventures.com 1.0 ACCREDITATION / REGISTRATION
More informationAgronomy 365 Exam I Spring 2002
Agronomy 365 Exam I Spring 2002 Name Lab Please keep your answers brief and to the point. DO NOT try to fill in all the space given unless you need it to answer the question. Where applicable, show your
More informationSoil fertility & fertilizers. Soil Nutrients. Soil Nutrients. by Jeff Choate
Soil fertility & fertilizers by Jeff Choate 1 Soil Nutrients Of all the elements plants need, 3 are needed in much larger quantities than all others combined. Carbon (C) Hydrogen (H) Oxygen (O) Plants
More informationAgronomy 354 Quiz 1, January 20, Name (-5 points if not written legibly))
Quiz 1, January 20, 2006 Name (-5 points if not written legibly)) Below are 7 multiple choice questions. Mark the best answer. Each correct response is worth 3 points. 1. The item below that is not a function
More informationSOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION
SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION WHAT IS SOIL? Soil is the medium in which plants grow - the basis for plant growth. I can t get any respect. People treat me like dirt! Four Major Components of Soil Sand Silt
More informationRetail Price List. Prices valid from 1 st January to 30 th June 2018 Version 1
Retail Price List Prices valid from 1 st January to 30 th June 2018 Version 1 Introduction & Service Information INTRODUCTION Nutrient Advantage is one of the largest providers of soil, plant tissue, water,
More informationTest Report No.T JP Date: FEB 24, 2017 Page 1 of 6
Test Report No.T51710190071JP Date: FEB 24, 2017 Page 1 of 6 JIAN PLASTIC & METAL PRODUCTS LTD NO.3-1, SOUTH GAOBU BLVD, GAOBU TOWN, DONGGUAN CITY, GUANGDONG PROVINCE, CHINA,ZIP CODE:523278 The following
More informationBIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH.37 - SOIL.
!! www.clutchprep.com Plants produce sugars from photosynthesis, but still have many nutritional requirements C, H, and O account for ~95% of a plant s dry weight, and are obtained from CO2 and H2O Vascular
More informationRainfall impact on sodium leaching at Denver Country Club. Doug Brooks, Denver Country Club, Larry Stowell, Ph.D., PACE Turf LLC
Project Principal investigators Sponsor Rainfall impact on sodium leaching at Denver Country Club Doug Brooks, Denver Country Club, Larry Stowell, Ph.D., PACE Turf LLC Denver Country Club Summary This
More information