Porous metal augments
|
|
- Rosa Stafford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE REVISION HIP Porous metal augments BIG HOPES FOR BIG HOLES M. Abolghasemian, S. Tangsataporn, A. Sternheim, D. J. Backstein, O. A. Safir, A. E. Gross From Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M. Abolghasemian, MD, Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery Iran University of Medical Sciences, Shafa hospital, Jaleh Street, Baharestan Square, Tehran, , Iran. S. Tangsataporn, MD, Orthopedic surgeon, Research fellow A. Sternheim, MD, Clinical Fellow of Orthopedic Surgery D. J. Backstein, MD, FRCSC, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery O. A. Safir, MD, FRCSC, Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery A. E. Gross, MD, FRCSC, Professor of Orthopedic Surgery Division of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Suite 476A, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada. Correspondence should be sent to M. Abolghasemian; The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery doi: / x.95b $2.00 Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A: Received 7 September 2013; Accepted after revision 8 September 2013 The conventional method for reconstructing acetabular bone loss at revision surgery includes using structural bone allograft. The disadvantages of this technique promoted the advent of metallic but biocompatible porous implants to fill bone defects enhancing initial and long-term stability of the acetabular component. This paper presents the indications, surgical technique and the outcome of using porous metal acetabular augments for reconstructing acetabular defects. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B, Supple A: Most acetabular revision operations are currently performed using a hemispherical acetabular component. 1 However, when there is a significant amount of segmental and/or contained bone loss such that the initial stability or long-term fixation of the acetabular component cannot be achieved, augmentation is indicated. The conventional method of using either minor (< 50% of the acetabulum) or major (> 50% of the acetabulum) column structural allografts has disadvantages. The risk of disease transmission is low but possible 2 and in the longer term there may be immunological reactions by the host tissue and reabsorption of the graft material. 3 Porous materials facilitate bone ingrowth and augments made with these metals come in different shapes and sizes. All offer the facility to fill variable defect types and to provide structural support to the acetabular component (Fig. 1). The high porosity of the products is ideal for bone ingrowth, 4 the porous augment will be supported by the host bone after ingrowth occurs, and ultimately, the acetabular implant will be supported both directly at its contact site to the host bone, and indirectly through the bony contact of the augment. This is the base of our concept of effective host bone contact, defined as the sum of the contact area of both porous implants (acetabular component and any augment) with the host bone. Since a certain amount of contact of the implant with host bone is considered essential for long term stability of the acetabular component, a porous augment will enhance this stability through increasing the contact area. It is to be noted that the augment-bone contact area is often some distance from the acetabular component proper. This in effect extends the usable bone available to sustain acetabular stability Surgical technique After exposure of the acetabulum through the surgeon s preferred approach, the old component, surrounding debris and fibrous tissue should be removed, careful not to compromise further the already defective bone stock. After exposing the acetabular floor, gentle reaming at the correct anatomical position should be performed to prepare the bony bed. The final classification of bone defect is best done at this stage. The authors use their own classification based on the percentage of acetabular bone that has been lost (Table I). 5 If the circumference of the actabular rim is intact, any bone loss will be considered contained. In the case of a segmental defect, the authors use the trial acetabulum to classify the defect. The bone defect is quantified based on the uncovered portion of a trial inserted into the cavity after completion of reaming. The trial is divided into four quadrants and the sum of segmental defect percentages for each quadrant is used to compile the total defect. Once the classification has been made, the appropriate acetabular reconstruction can be determined. Type I and II defects do not usually require the use of acetabular augments. In type I, conventional cemented or cementless components can be used. Type II defects are usually managed by morsellised bone grafting and normal uncemented, or impaction grafting with cemented acetabular cups. If there is < 50% contact of the cup with viable host bone, the use of an ultra-porous acetabular component VOL. 95-B, No. 11, NOVEMBER
2 104 M. ABOLGHASEMIAN, S. TANGSATAPORN, A. STERNHEIM, D. J. BACKSTEIN, O. A. SAFIR, A. E. GROSS Fig. 1a Fig. 1b Fig. 1c Fig. 1d Photographs of various augments, showing a) conventional augments in a range of thicknesses, b) anterior, posterior and straight column buttress augments, c) restrictors and d) shim augments. Table I. Gross classification of acetabular bone loss Type I II III IV V Defect No significant loss of bone stock Contained loss of bone stock (cavitary) Uncontained loss of bone stock involving < 50% of acetabulum (minor column defect) Uncontained loss of bone stock involving > 50% of acetabulum (major column defect) Pelvic discontinuity with uncontained loss of bone stock (i.e. trabecular metal (TM), Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) is recommended to ensure sufficient initial stability and potential for subsequent bone ingrowth. Types III and IV defects are most frequently associated with the use of augments. Enhancing the stability of the cup with structural support either with allograft bone or an augment is usually necessary when facing a defect of > 40%, or when the press-fit of a TM cup cannot be achieved. 6 The potential for bony ingrowth by the host bone is a requirement when planning to use an augment, otherwise non-biological alternatives such as conventional metal cages should be considered. 7 Selection of the appropriate augment is based on the size of the defect and the geometry of the adjacent pelvic bone. Our experience has been with trabecular metal (TM) augments and the rest of this text will refer to these products. The augment can be placed in any position or orientation to improve the initial stability of the construct, but there are some common situations. Firstly, a minor or major column defect that is surrounded by an intact rim of acetabular bone within 30 mm of the outer perimeter of the trial acetabular cup, which is the maximum thickness of augments normally available. One or two conventional augments can be used in a wedge configuration to fill a similarly shaped defect (Fig. 2). The appropriate diameter of the augment is chosen based on the internal diameter of the segmental defect of the acetabulum, which is usually equal or smaller relative to the trial cup diameter. Our preference is to fix the CCJR SUPPLEMENT TO THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL
3 POROUS METAL AUGMENTS 105 Fig. 2 Radiograph showing a minor column defect reconstructed with a TM cup and a TM augment in wedge configuration. Fig. 3a Fig. 3b A 53-year-old woman underwent an operation to revise a loose, protruded cup. a) The subsequent radiograph shows a small segmental defect associated with a large contained medial defect. One augment in the flying buttress configuration and one in the foundation configuration were used to reinforce the TM cup. b) Post-operative radiograph after one year. Cup and augments are stable: the patient is functioning very well. augment first, kept in place with the guide of the trial cup. As many screws as possible (at least two) should be inserted to fix the augment before inserting the TM cup. Secondly, a severe contained medial defect is faced with an intact but thin peripheral rim which would not be sufficiently supportive for a cementless cup. A conventional augment could be inserted into the defect as a foundation in order to provide medial support to the overlying acetabular shell (Fig. 3). Thirdly, when a minor column defect is present with no bony rim available within 30 mm of the trial cup but with a supportive bony bed, a conventional augment can be used in the opposite way of the wedge configuration. The flat surface of the augment is placed medially against the ilium just above the trial cup (Fig. 4), and secured to the bone with three screws. This flying buttress configuration is assumed to be supportive to the cup as only a moderate amount of shear force on the augment is expected with a minor column defect. A thicker augment is preferable to obtain as broad a contact as possible with the underlying bone. Finally, a major column defect is associated with lack of bony rim within 30 mm of the trial cup. We feel that even the strongest conventional augment in flying buttress configuration would not have enough host bone contact to resist the powerful shear forces exerted by the uncovered element of the acetabular component. Buttress augments in this situation aim to maximise the bone contact area and stability of the construct as a whole. In case of a straight superior defect, a straight buttress (figure of seven) (Fig. 1) augment is desirable. When the defect is mainly in the anterior or posterior part of the trial acetabular component, an anterior or a posterior column buttress augment is VOL. 95-B, No. 11, NOVEMBER 2013
4 106 M. ABOLGHASEMIAN, S. TANGSATAPORN, A. STERNHEIM, D. J. BACKSTEIN, O. A. SAFIR, A. E. GROSS Fig. 4 Radiograph showing a minor column defect reconstructed with a TM augment in flying buttress configuration. Fig. 5a Fig. 5b Radiograph showing a major column defect, which has been a) reconstructed by a TM cup in addition to b) a straight buttress and a shim augment. preferable (Fig. 1b). The corresponding part of the ilium should be exposed in order to seat the augment. If a gap persists between the flat part of the augment and the ilium, a shim augment can be used (Fig. 5). The abutting surfaces of the shim and the buttress augment are then filled with bone cement. Any remaining contained defects should be filled with particulate bone graft. The use of more than one augment in a single reconstruction may be required, 8 especially when a major column defect is to be addressed using wedge rather than buttress augments; they can be placed in wedge configuration, either side by side or at opposing poles of the acetabulum, based on the location of the bone defect. The selected augment frequently is not a perfect match to the defect and some adjustments will be necessary. Minor mismatches could be addressed by burring the bony bed to accommodate the augment. Major discrepancies, however are usually corrected by removing the corresponding portion of the augment using a rongeur. We routinely pack some morsellised bone graft into the windows of the augment to encourage bone remodeling. The augment will not provide full support for the cup and metal debris may be released through fretting if they are not cemented. The effective host bone contact concept is valid only if there is a reasonable unity of the construct comprised of the porous cup and the porous augment. The mechanical validity of this combined construct remains to be verified, but as most of the forces between cup and augment are compressive, the authors feel the cement is capable of accommodating these forces. We have modified the CCJR SUPPLEMENT TO THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL
5 POROUS METAL AUGMENTS 107 original technique recommended by the manufacturer, including the application of bone cement to the interface of cup and augment at the time of insertion of the TM cup. A small amount of cement is placed between the cup and the augment while cementing the liner to the revision shell. A revision TM shell is preferable when using an augment, as the surgeon has some flexibility in positioning a revision cup as minor mal-positions can be compensated for by adjusting the position of the liner within the shell. Extra screw holes can also be drilled through the shell material to the best available host bone. This type of porous tantalum revision cup possesses a lower modulus of elasticity that is biomechanically advantageous. 4 The porous acetabular component is fixed with a minimum of three screws. It is beneficial to have some screws inserted superiorly and postero-superiorly into the pelvic columns, and an additional ischial screw to provide stability for the cup in as many planes as possible. If the best bone available to fix the screws is out of alignment with the manufacturer s provided screw holes, new holes can be made with a metal burr when using a revision TM shell. However, in these circumstances, some metal debris will inevitably be released and, the long term consequence is as yet unknown. Occasionally it is possible to strengthen the construct further by aligning one screw hole of the cup with the augment window so that a screw can go across both components into the host bone. Porous augments have been used in combination with alternative acetabular components to ultra-porous cementless shells. Recently, good results were reported for impaction grafting as well as application of combined cemented cups and porous augments. 9 The authors have frequently used TM augments in association with cup-cage constructs and conventional cages, and the use of porous augments can also be justified in some primary hip replacements. One common indication is when there is a significant segmental defect in acetabulum in an elderly patient, especially in the absence of a usable femoral head for autograft. Post-operatively, the patients are advised to restrict weight bearing for eight to 12 weeks based on the stability of fixation and the amount of bone loss (less for the wedge configuration and more for other configurations). Patients are followed regularly and radiographs are evaluated regarding signs of cup or augment loosening, including the appearance of lucent lines around the implants, changes in position of the components and progressive metal debris shedding; a sign of friction between a loose cup and a stable augment. 6 Valid radiological criteria for augment loosening remains to be defined. Outcomes The use of porous augments in acetabular revision has been rewarding in short and mid-term follow-up. In the five series reported so far, 154 augments (147 conventional and seven buttress augments) were used in 149 hips. 6,10-13 We excluded the reports on the mixed results of acetabular reconstructions with and without augments. 14 The mean follow up of these studies have ranged from 32 to 64.5 months and a total of seven aseptic failures were reported. Most recently, Abolghasemian et al 6 reported on the first 34 revisions performed with the use of TM cups and augments in our institution. At a mean follow-up of 64.5 months, there were three aseptic and one septic loosenings. There were no aseptic failures in cases with minor column defects treated by augments in either wedge or flying buttress configuration, and only one of the 14 cases with major column defects developed aseptic loosening. This is a better outcome compared with conventional methods used to treat acetabular bone loss with the use of structural bone allograft, where mid-term failure rates of around 20% and 50% have been reported for minor and major column allografting techniques respectively. 15,16 The other two aseptic failures were in patients with pelvic discontinuity. No substantial distraction had been applied to the discontinuity sites, and the authors concluded that using a TM cup and augment for treating pelvic discontinuity was not recommended. However, studies from elsewhere showed promising results regarding use of a TM cup with and without augment for pelvic discontinuity if applied with 6 mm to 8 mm of distraction. 17 Future perspectives Our knowledge of augments and their proficiency in acetabular revision is limited by several factors. There is no long term study yet available and what we have is mostly on the use of conventional augments with no distinction being made between the different configurations, and there is very little data on results of restrictors and buttress augments. Augment-cage and augment-cup-cage composites although being used in some centres, have not been evaluated yet. Biomechanical studies will be of help to assess the strength of cement in unifying the cup and augment, the possibility of fatigue failure of augments under the compressive forces exerted by the adjacent cup, and the distinctive biomechanical features of different augment shapes and configurations. Some concerns remain unresolved regarding the use of porous augments. They do not restore bone stock and may cause even more bone loss if they have to be removed during revision surgery. The metal debris released at the time of creating new screw holes through the porous shells, or those created by fretting between the augment and a loose cup might cause local and systemic adverse reactions. Consequently, we still tend to use bone allograft in young patients with high probability for another revision. However, considering the versatility they offer to the surgeon and the favourable short- and mid-term outcomes reported so far for TM augments, their use will become more frequent in the immediate future until we know more about their long-term performance. No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. VOL. 95-B, No. 11, NOVEMBER 2013
6 108 M. ABOLGHASEMIAN, S. TANGSATAPORN, A. STERNHEIM, D. J. BACKSTEIN, O. A. SAFIR, A. E. GROSS This paper is based on a study which was presented at the 29th Annual Winter 2012 Current Concepts in Joint Replacement meeting held in Orlando, Florida, 12th 15th December. References 1. Park DK, Della Valle CJ, Quigley L, et al. Revision of the acetabular component without cement. A concise follow-up, at twenty to twenty-four years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A: Ng VY. Risk of disease transmission with bone allograft. Orthopedics 2012;35: Lee PT, Raz G, Safir OA, Backstein DJ, Gross AE. Long-term results for minor column allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468: Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B: Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni ASaleh L, et al. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2001;19: Abolghasemian M, Tangsataporn S, Sternheim A, et al. Combined trabecular metal acetabular shell and augment for acetabular revision with substantial bone loss: a mid-term review. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B: Massin P, Duparc J. Total hip replacement in irradiated hips: a retrospective study of 71 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B: Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl): Borland WS, Bhattacharya R, Holland JP, Brewster NT. Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss. Acta Orthop 2012;83: Nehme A, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;429: Siegmeth A, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Kim WY, Garbuz DS. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467: Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006;21(Suppl): Del Gaizo DJ, Kancherla V, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470: Lingaraj K, Teo YH, Bergman N. The management of severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using modular porous metal components. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B: Woodgate IG, Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, et al. Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;371: Kwong LM, Jasty M, Harris WH. High failure rate of bulk femoral head allografts in total hip acetabular reconstructions at 10 years. J Arthroplasty 1993;8: Sporer SM, Bottros JJ, Hulst JB, et al. Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470: CCJR SUPPLEMENT TO THE BONE & JOINT JOURNAL
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments Surgical Technique
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments Surgical Technique Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments 1 Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision
More informationThe Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity During Acetabular Revision
The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 20 No. 4 Suppl. 2 2005 The Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity During Acetabular Revision Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS,*y Michael O Rourke, MD,z and Wayne G. Paprosky, MD, FACS*y
More informationTrabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment Surgical Technique The Best Thing Next To Bone Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment Acetabular Assessment and Preparation Intra-operatively,
More informationTrabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment Surgical Technique The Best Thing Next To Bone Trabecular Metal Acetabular Restrictor and Augment Acetabular Assessment and Preparation Intra-operatively,
More informationTRABECULAR METAL ACETABULAR RESTRICTOR AND AUGMENT. Surgical Technique
TRABECULAR METAL ACETABULAR RESTRICTOR AND AUGMENT Surgical Technique ACETABULAR ASSESSMENT AND PREPARATION Intra-operatively, carefully assess any acetabular bone defects present. Note the location, extent,
More informationEarly results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2013, 79, 530-535 ORIGINAL STUDY Early results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty Ibrahim Elganzoury, Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony From
More informationPelvic discontinuity
THE REVISION HIP Pelvic discontinuity CURRENT SOLUTIONS J. Petrie, A. Sassoon, G. J. Haidukewych From Orlando Regional Medical Center, Florida, United States Pelvic discontinuity represents a rare but
More information1Acetabular Reaming. 2Shell Sizing and Positioning. Trial Range of Motion. Trabecular Metal Natural Cup System
Trabecular Metal Natural Cup System 1Acetabular Reaming Use progressively larger reamers to prepare the acetabulum. Hold the reamer steady in the same position in which the cup will be implanted (approximately
More information*smith&nephew CONTOUR
Surgical Technique *smith&nephew CONTOUR Acetabular Rings CONTOUR Acetabular Rings Surgical technique completed in conjunction with Joseph Schatzker MD, BSc (Med.), FRCS (C) Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS (C)
More informationRECOVERY. P r o t r u s i o
RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e Design Features Revision acetabular surgery is a major challenge facing today s total joint revision surgeon. Failed endo/bi-polars,
More informationTrabecular Metal Technology The Best Thing Next to Bone
Trabecular Metal Technology The Best Thing Next to Bone Trabecular Metal Material resembles trabecular bone in its cellular structure and weight-bearing characteristics. By approximating the mechanical
More informationRevision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 28(2): 98-103, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2016.28.2.98 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with
More informationTrabecular Metal Natural Cup System
Trabecular Metal Natural Cup System Performance like nature intended... The Best Thing Next to Bone Trabecular Metal Natural Cup System Combining the benefits of a unique monoblock construct with those
More informationThe custom triflange cup
ACETABULAR REVISION The custom triflange cup BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME G. P. Goodman, C. A. Engh Jr From Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute The custom triflange is a patient-specific implant for
More informationEvaluating and Treating Acetabular Bone Loss with Pelvic Discontinuity
Evaluating and Treating Acetabular Bone Loss with Pelvic Discontinuity Neil P. Sheth, MD Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Kuala Lumpur MALAYSIA July 03, 2017 Consultant Zimmer PERSONA TKA evaluation
More informationPINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM
PINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. DESIGN RATIONALE FLEXIBILITY. PRECISION. CONFIDENCE. DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction is proud to offer the
More informationDesign Rationale/Surgical Technique GRIPTION TF
Design Rationale/Surgical Technique GRIPTION TF Table of contents Augment, Shim, and Buttress Portfolio...4 GRIPTION TF Augments System Overview...5 GRIPTION TF Buttress System Overview...6 GRIPTION TF
More informationZimmer Segmental System
Zimmer Segmental System Simple solutions for solving complex salvage cases A Step Forward The Zimmer Segmental System is designed to address patients with severe bone loss associated with disease, trauma
More informationCement Polished Tapered Stems of 12/14 Taper. 96 mm 98 mm 104 mm 110 mm 116 mm 122 mm 128 mm. Ceramic Femoral Head. Outer Diameter
Design Philosophy Cementless Stems of 12/14 Taper Stem Length Neck shaft Angle STEM-N3 STEM-N4 STEM-N5 STEM-N6 STEM-N7 STEM-N8 STEM-N9 123 mm 125 mm 130 mm 135 mm 140 mm 145 mm 150 mm 132 Cement Polished
More informationCase report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?
Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis? Diagnosis: Ceramic head fracture In the 1970 s, Boutin implemented ceramic in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA).
More informationManaging Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision
This is an enhanced PDF from The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery The PDF of the article you requested follows this cover page. Managing Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision Scott M. Sporer, Wayne G. Paprosky
More informationFeaturing. Technology. Product Rationale
Featuring Technology Product Rationale 2 Optimum implant geometry Extending proven TRI-LOCK heritage The original TRI-LOCK Stem was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge
More informationPLR. Proximal Loading Revision Hip System
PLR Proximal Loading Revision Hip System The PLR splined revision stem is designed to recreate the natural stresses in the revised femur, where proximal bone may be compromised. PLR Hip System Design Considerations
More informationSURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM Important: This essential product information does not include all of the information necessary for selection and use of a device.
More informationArcos Modular Femoral Revision System
Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System Arcos System Simplify the Complex The Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System meets the demands of complex hip revision surgery by offering surgeons and OR staff the
More informationAcetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 29(3): 168-175, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.168 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationRegenerex Porous Titanium Construct. Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI Trauma Technology
Regenerex Porous Titanium Construct Knees Hips Extremities Cement and Accessories PMI Trauma Technology One Surgeon. One Patient. Over 1 million times per year, Biomet helps one surgeon provide personalized
More informationRevision Total Hip Replacement
Revision Total Hip Replacement Dr. (Prof.) Anil Arora MS (Ortho) DNB (Ortho) Dip SIROT (USA) FAPOA (Korea), FIGOF (Germany), FJOA (Japan) Commonwealth Fellow Joint Replacement (Royal National Orthopaedic
More informationTrabecular Metal Tibial Cone Surgical Technique
Trabecular Metal Tibial Cone Surgical Technique Provides structural support in areas of bone loss Trabecular Metal Cone 1 Zimmer Trabecular Metal Tibial Cone Surgical Technique Table of Contents Overview
More informationShort-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA
n Feature Article Short-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA Michael A. Wind Jr, MD; Michael L. Swank, MD; Joel I. Sorger, MD abstract
More informationThe Leader in Orthopaedic Innovation
The Leader in Orthopaedic Innovation Wright is a leading international manufacturer and distributor of superior, easy to use, and innovative orthopaedic implants and instrumentation. For over 50 years,
More informationBone Bangalore
Dr Suresh Annamalai MBBS, MRCS(Edn), FRCS( Tr & Orth)(Edn), FEBOT(European Board), Young Hip and Knee Fellowship(Harrogate, UK) Consultant Arthroplasty and Arthroscopic Surgeon Manipal Hospital, Whitefield,
More informationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, US.
ISSN: 2572-2964 Volume 2, Issue 1, 6 Pages Research Article Acetabular fractures can complicate hip arthroplasty and result in higher rates of intraoperative complications and worse long-term outcomes
More informationZimmer Trabecular Metal Dental Implant
Zimmer Trabecular Metal Dental Implant TRABECULAR METAL MATERIAL: Designed to Enhance Secondary Stability Through Bone Ingrowth. Artistic Rendering osseoincorporation TRABECULAR METAL MATERIAL Designed
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending the proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationManagement Of Acetabular Deficiency In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Series Of 15 Cases
ISPUB.COM The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery Volume 21 Number 2 Management Of Acetabular Deficiency In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Series Of 15 Cases G Khanna, R Sharma, D Singh, T A Chandy Citation
More information28 Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 28 26 Technique described by James L. Guyton, MD Campbell Clinic Memphis, Tennessee James W. Harkess, MD Campbell Clinic Memphis, Tennessee David G. LaVelle,
More informationACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
ACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ACETABULAR CUP DEVICE INDICATIONS FOR USE The ICONACY I-Hip total hip replacement is indicated for the following conditions: 1. A severely painful and/or disabled hip
More informationEXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION
EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION SINCE 1983 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING EXPLANTATION OPTIONS the cement from inside the cement canal until the bone/ cement bond
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Surgical Technique Optimum implant geometry Extending proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationTrabecular Metal Primary Hip Prosthesis
Trabecular Metal Primary Hip Prosthesis Quick-Reference Guide The Best Thing Next to Bone Trabecular Metal Primary Hip Prosthesis Quick-Reference Guide Key Features & Benefits Proximal Trabecular Metal
More informationTrinity. Advanced Bearing Acetabular System Surgical technique
Advanced Bearing Acetabular System Surgical technique Contents Operative summary Introduction Pre-operative planning Acetabular preparation Acetabular reaming Reamer guide Acetabular shell trials Acetabular
More informationEarly catastrophic failure of Birmingham acetabular dysplasia cup in revision arthroplasty: a case report Manjunath Ramappa* and Andrew Port
Open Access Case report Early catastrophic failure of Birmingham acetabular dysplasia cup in revision arthroplasty: a case report Manjunath Ramappa* and Andrew Port Address: Department Of Orthopaedics,
More informationCC TRIO VERSAFITCUP. Surgical Technique. each to their own. Hip Knee Spine Navigation
VERSAFITCUP CC TRIO each to their own Surgical Technique Hip Knee Spine Navigation Versafitcup CC TRIO Surgical Technique Hip Knee Spine Navigation EACH TO THEIR OWN The Versafitcup CC Trio is a range
More informationClinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2010, 76, 58-62 ORIGINAL STUDY Clinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery Pax WILLEMSE, Rene M. CASTELEIN, Paul L. P. A. BOM, Aart VERBURG,
More informationOSSIS is an ISO accredited company.
CUSTOM IMPLANTS Over the last 15 years Ossis orthopaedic surgeons and materials and design engineers have been at the leading-edge of innovation in patient-specific implants. Ossis combines the use of
More informationPROCOTYL E Acetabular Cup System. Modular to Fit Patient s Anatomy. Versatile for Revisions.
PROCOTYL E Acetabular Cup System Modular to Fit Patient s Anatomy. Versatile for Revisions. TM PROCOTYL E Shell is a revision modular shell manufactured from titanium alloy. It is ovoid-shaped, with a
More informationComparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional Hip Arthroplasty
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 29(1): 24-29, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.1.24 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Comparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional
More informationAML Hip System. Design Rationale/ Surgical Technique
AML Hip System Design Rationale/ Surgical Technique Design Rationale Evolution In 1977, DePuy Synthes Companies introduced the original cementless total hip. The AML Hip launched in order to solve one
More informationTrilogy Acetabular System
Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Versatility in a proven design Trilogy Acetabular System 1 Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Table of Contents Acetabular Reaming 2 Component Sizing
More informationBone Preservation Stem
TRI-LOCK Bone Preservation Stem Featuring GRIPTION Coating Surgical Technique Implant Geometry Extending the TRI-LOCK Stem heritage The original TRI-LOCK Stem was introduced in 1981. This implant was
More informationOSSIS is an ISO accredited company.
CUSTOM IMPLANTS Over the last 15 years Ossis orthopaedic surgeons and materials and design engineers have been at the leading-edge of innovation in patient-specific implants. Ossis combines the use of
More informationOPTIONAL/ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTS
20 Elevated 6320-36-22 20 Elevated Rim Liner, 36mm OD x 22mm ID 6320-80-22 20 Elevated Rim Liner, 80mm OD x 22mm ID 6320-42-26 20 Elevated Rim Liner, 42mm OD x 26mm ID 6320-80-26 20 Elevated Rim Liner,
More informationADDRESSING CLINICAL ISSUES OF CEMENTLESS HIP ARTHROPLASTY
E C H E L O N P R I M A R Y H I P S Y S T E M P R O D U C T R A T I O N A L E ADDRESSING CLINICAL ISSUES OF CEMENTLESS HIP ARTHROPLASTY Echelon Primary Total Hip System HIGH OFFSET STANDARD OFFSET Cementless
More informationTrilogy Acetabular System
Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Versatility in a proven design Trilogy Acetabular System 1 Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Table of Contents Acetabular Reaming 2 Component Sizing
More informationTHE PERSONALIZED KNEE
THE PERSONALIZED KNEE REDEFINING PERSONALIZATION Total knee replacement has long ranked among the most successful procedures in modern medicine. While you can expect excellent implant survivorship with
More informationTrilogy Acetabular System
Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Versatility in a proven design Trilogy Acetabular System 1 Trilogy Acetabular System Surgical Technique Table of Contents Acetabular Reaming 2 Component Sizing
More informationPrinciples of acetabular fixation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz, Anna WAGNER
Principles of acetabular fixation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz, Anna WAGNER Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Medical University of Silesia Head of
More informationEVOLVING OUR HERITAGE, MEETING YOUR NEEDS. Surgical Technique
EVOLVING OUR HERITAGE, MEETING YOUR NEEDS Surgical Technique Joint Spine Sports Med Mpact DM Surgical Technique Joint Spine Sports Med INTRODUCTION The Mpact DM is part of the Mpact Acetabular System and
More informationDesign Rationale. ECHELON Primary Hip System
Design Rationale ECHELON Primary Hip System ECHELON Primary Total Hip System Addressing clinical issues of cementless hip arthroplasty Cementless total hip arthroplasty has provided a proven method of
More informationProduct Rationale. Where Strength and Modularity Connect
Product Rationale Where Strength and Modularity Connect 2 ReClaim Modular Revision Hip System Advanced Strength 1 Advanced Strength Over 600 million cycles of testing 1 Advanced Fixation Advanced Instrumentation
More informationCIRCUMFERENTIAL PROXIMAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS IN REVISION SURGERY ON TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CASE REPORTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 20 YEARS
CASE REPORT CIRCUMFERENTIAL PROXIMAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS IN REVISION SURGERY ON TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CASE REPORTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 20 YEARS Bruno Dutra Roos 1, Milton Valdomiro Roos 2, Antero
More informationAcetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
EDITORIL Hip Pelvis 28(1): 1-14, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2016.28.1.1 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 cetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip rthroplasty Won Yong Shon, MD, PhD, Siva
More informationpact SYSTEM Surgical Technique HEMISPHERICAL CEMENTLESS CUP SYSTEM MULTI-HOLE & RIM-HOLE Hip Knee Spine Navigation
pact SYSTEM HEMISPHERICAL CEMENTLESS CUP SYSTEM MULTI-HOLE & RIM-HOLE Surgical Technique Hip Knee Spine Navigation Mpact Surgical Technique Hip Knee Spine Navigation PREFACE The Mpact Multi-hole and the
More informationThe necessity to restore the anatomic hip centre in congenital hip disease
Perspective Page 1 of 5 The necessity to restore the anatomic hip centre in congenital hip disease George A. Macheras, Panagiotis Lepetsos, Panagiotis P. Anastasopoulos, Spyridon P. Galanakos Fourth Department
More informationSurgical Technique. Cup System
Surgical Technique Cup System INDICATIONS AND USAGE Indications for the use of the CS2 ACETABULAR CUP SYSTEM must be carefully considered with respect to the patient s entire evaluation and alternative
More informationTemplating and Pre Operative Planning 2. Preparation of the Acetabulum 4. Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5.
Surgical Technique Contents Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum 4 Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5 Cup Positioning 6 Joint Stability 7 Trial sizing and Impaction
More informationReaching new heights. Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple.
Reaching new heights Comprehensive. Efficient. Simple. Various acetabular cup choices Compatible with the different head and liner options including VERILAST Technology Reach for proven OR efficient Instrumentation
More informationExeter Contemporary Flanged Cup. Exeter. Providing Solutions
Exeter Contemporary Flanged Cup Exeter Providing Solutions Design Benefits Even Cement Mantle Four polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement spacers are attached to the cup to maintain a minimum thickness of
More informationDual Mobility Cups. Kris Govaers, MD, PhD Dendermonde Belgium
Dual Mobility Cups Kris Govaers, MD, PhD Dendermonde Belgium Introduction Indications Limitations Conclusions All good things in life come from France Gilles Bousquet 1979 + Rambert (SERF) Inventions Bousquet
More informationCancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Cancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Nilesh Patil, MD; Katherine Hwang, MS; Stuart B. Goodman, MD, PhD abstract Full article available
More informationAugmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty
Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 466:579 583 DOI 10.1007/s11999-007-0104-4 SYMPOSIUM: NEW APPROACHES TO SHOULDER SURGERY Augmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty Robert S. Rice
More informationVersatility in a proven design. Trilogy Acetabular System
Versatility in a proven design Trilogy Acetabular System Wide-ranging options. Clear-cut solutions. Offering a broad selection of shell and liner configurations, the Trilogy Acetabular System is designed
More informationMultiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort
Send Orders of Reprints at reprints@benthamscience.org 488 The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2012, 6, 488-494 Open Access Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort O. Bischel
More informationUnderstanding Hip Implant Options
Understanding Hip Implant Options Cup (Socket) Bearing (Liner) Head Stem (Femur) Modern Hip Implants (Ball) Metal Femoral Head on Marathon Cross-linked Polyethylene Liner Proven materials Polyethylene
More informationADEPT Extra Fixation Cup. Operative Technique. Delivering Results Through Performance
ADEPT Extra Fixation Cup Operative Technique Delivering Results Through Performance Contents Section 1 Introduction 3 Section 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum 4 Section 3 Preparation of the Extra Fixation
More informationESC. Enhanced Stability Liners. Design Rationale & Surgical Technique
ESC Enhanced Stability Liners Design Rationale & Surgical Technique Choice Without Compromise DePuy Synthes PINNACLE Hip Solutions are designed with a wide range of acetabular cup options, biological and
More informationFracture of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement: A Case Report
Syracuse University SURFACE Biomedical and Chemical Engineering College of Engineering and Computer Science 1997 Fracture of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement: A Case Report R T. Trousdale
More informationHedrocel trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cups : mid-term results
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2006, 72, 326-331 ORIGINAL STUDY Hedrocel trabecular metal monoblock acetabular cups : mid-term results Michiel MULIER, Bart RYS, Lieven MOKE From the University Hospital Pellenberg,
More informationRx90 Total Hip System Acetabular Series
Rx90 Total Hip System Acetabular Series The Rx90 Total Hip System was developed by Stanley Asnis, M.D., in conjunction with David Dines, M.D. and Micheal Errico M.D., Co-Section-Chiefs of the North Shore
More informationREVISING THE DEFICIENT PROXIMAL FEMUR
REVISING THE DEFICIENT PROXIMAL FEMUR by David Mattingly, Boston, MA Joseph McCarthy, Boston, MA Benjamin E. Bierbaum, Boston, MA Hugh P. Chandler, Boston, MA Roderick H. Turner, Boston, MA Hugh U. Cameron,
More informationFLH183 04/08. Biomet UK Ltd Waterton Industrial Estate Bridgend, South Wales CF31 3XA, United Kingdom. Tel. +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
FLH183 04/08 Biomet UK Ltd Waterton Industrial Estate Bridgend, South Wales CF31 3XA, United Kingdom Tel. +44 (0)1656 655221 Fax: +44 (0)1656 645454 Exceed ABT Operative Technique The Exceed ABT TM acetabular
More informationPrevention of dislocation after hip replacement in elderly patients. Piotr WOJCIECHOWSKI, Damian KUSZ, Mariusz NOWAK, Konrad KOPEĆ
Prevention of dislocation after hip replacement in elderly patients. Piotr WOJCIECHOWSKI, Damian KUSZ, Mariusz NOWAK, Konrad KOPEĆ Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Medical University of Silesia
More informationThe shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2003: 11(1): 53 58 The shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients KY Chiu, TP Ng, WM Tang Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
More informationRECLAIM REVISION HIP SYSTEM
RECLAIM REVISION HIP SYSTEM Where Strength and Modularity Connect DESIGN RATIONALE System Overview RECLAIM Modular Revision Hip System WHERE STRENGTH & MODULARITY CONNECT 2 Offset Options Proximal Body
More informationSurgical Technique. Hip System
Surgical Technique Hip System INDICATIONS FOR USE The TaperSet Hip System is designed for total or partial hip arthroplasty and is intended to be used with compatible components of the Consensus Hip System.
More informationPERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP ARTHOPLASTY
PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP ARTHOPLASTY Jon Minter, DO Arthritis and Total Joint Specialists Atlanta, Georgia ArthritisAndTotalJoint.Com Intra Op Incidence of Periprosthetic Hip Fractures
More informationEnhancing stability and increasing range of motion. Metasul LDH Large Diameter Head
Enhancing stability and increasing range of motion Metasul LDH Large Diameter Head The Metasul large diameter head technology is the result of in-depth research, development and clinical experience that
More informationExtensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III Defects
Extensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III Defects Lien-Hsiang Chung, MD; Po-Kuei Wu, MD; Cheng-Fong Chen, MD; Wei-Ming Chen, MD;
More informationThis publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE DePuy Synthes DURALOC Surgical Technique CONTENTS Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum
More informationCONGENITAL HIP DISEASE IN YOUNG ADULTS CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT WITH THA. Th. KARACHALIOS, MD, DSc PROF IN ORTHOPAEDICS
CONGENITAL HIP DISEASE IN YOUNG ADULTS CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT WITH THA Th. KARACHALIOS, MD, DSc PROF IN ORTHOPAEDICS EDITOR IN CHIEF HIP INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF THESSALIA, LARISA HELLENIC REPUBLIC
More informationPinnacle revision cup in acetabular surgery Results at 2 to 5 years
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2013, 79, 392-397 ORIGINAL STUDY Pinnacle revision cup in acetabular surgery Results at 2 to 5 years Alain Dalemans, Sascha Colen, Marcus van Diemen, Michiel Mulier From the University
More informationR3think your options. For US distribution only.
R3think your options For US distribution only. R3think acetabular surgery It is widely accepted that total hip replacement surgery is one of the most successful procedures done today. Typically more thought
More informationMicroSeal Total Hip Acetabular System. Like Nothing Else
MicroSeal Total Hip Acetabular System Like Nothing Else Like Nothing Else Unique Patented Sealing and Locking Design The MicroSeal design features: Locking/Sealing mechanisms work together to minimize
More informationKEY CHOICES AND TECHNIQUES IN REVISION THA AND TKA Step-by-Step Decisions
KEY CHOICES AND TECHNIQUES IN REVISION THA AND TKA Step-by-Step Decisions Moderator: Panelists: Daniel J Berry, Mayo Clinic John J Callaghan William L Griffin Thomas P Vail Michael P Bolognesi Presenter
More informationCopyright Restricted. Revision hip arthroplasty is unquestionably one. A Modular Hip System for Simplification of Revision Hip Arthroplasty
Orthopedic Technologies & Techniques A Modular Hip System for Simplification of Revision Hip Arthroplasty Todd Sekundiak, MD Abstract Revision femoral arthroplasty can be a daunting task. Historical success
More informationThe Müller acetabular reinforcement ring still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2015, 81, 257-263 ORIGINAL STUDY The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years C. Kösters, B.
More informationRevision hip arthroplasty with S-ROM prosthesis: a study of clinical outcomes and implant stability
J Orthopaed Traumatol () 7:1 1 DOI 1.17/s1195--15- ORIGINAL M. El-Deen S. Zahid D.T. Miller A. Nargol R. Logishetty Revision hip arthroplasty with S-ROM prosthesis: a study of clinical outcomes and implant
More informationThe power of simplicity
The power of simplicity The power of simplicity Consider the facts, and take a look at the future: Revision TKA procedures are projected to double between now and 2015. 1 Restoration of a normal joint
More information