Management of Types III and IV Acetabular Deficiencies With the Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup
|
|
- Brendan Harmon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 21 No Management of Types III and IV Acetabular Deficiencies With the Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup Antonio Herrera, PhD, Ángel Antonio Martínez, MD, Jorge Cuenca, MD, and Vicente Canales, MD Abstract: Thirty-five longitudinal oblong revision (LOR) cups were used to reconstruct 29 type III and 6 type IV acetabular defects. Intraoperatively, we considered that cup contact was complete when we achieved a continuous contact between the cup periphery and the acetabular rim. When there were areas with a lack of contact, we considered that the contact was partial or incomplete. All patients were followed up for 4 to 8 years (mean = 6.3 years). At the latest follow-up, 30 cups were stable (85.8%) and 5 had migrated (14.2%). We found a significant relation between incomplete cup contact with the acetabular rim and subsequent failure ( P =.042). The abduction angle was significantly increased in the group of unstable cups ( P =.032) because of the migration of the acetabular component that became more vertical. Pain, limp, use of walking aids, functional level, and limb-length discrepancy significantly improved postoperatively ( P b.0001). The Harris hip score improved from a mean preoperative score of 37 points to that of 79 points ( P b.01). This implant showed satisfactory stability at early to midterm follow-up. Key words: acetabular defect, hip arthroplasty, longitudinal oblong revision cup. n 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The reconstruction management of major acetabular bone defects remains a challenging problem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Standard porous-coated hemispherical cups have provided excellent results in acetabula that have an intact rim of bone [1-7]. Oversized hemispherical cups that convert a deficient acetabulum into a hemisphere with an intact rim of bone have also given good results [8]. However, if an acetabular defect is large, standard or oversized hemispherical cups may not allow achieving enough stability. In such cases, From the Service of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain. Submitted June 14, 2004; accepted August 5, No benefits or funds were received in support of the study. Reprint requests: Antonio Herrera, PhD, Avda Cesáreo Alierta n815, 48B, Zaragoza, Spain. n 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved /06/ $32.00/0 doi: /j.arth several options for reconstruction have been used, including structural bone grafting [9-12], impacted morcellized cancellous bone grafting and cement [13-15], antiprotrusio cages or reinforcement rings [16-22], oblong [23-26] or bilobed [27-29] cups inserted without cement, and stemmed cups [30]. The use of large structural allografts has not given uniformly good results. The long-term failure rate reported has oscillated between 13% and 50% [9-12]. Antiprotrusio cages and reinforcement rings have provided a midterm rate of success that has oscillated between 80% and 90% [16-22]. Bilobed oblong porous-coated acetabular components have been reported to have a midterm loosening rate between 0% and 24% [27-29]. There are few reports about the use of oblong but not bilobed porous-coated components. Early experience was very limited, with some short series reported [24-26]. 857
2 858 The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 21 No. 6 September 2006 A long series has been published by Kfster et al [23], reporting a favorable midterm result in 98% of cases. A partially hydroxyapatite-coated stemmed acetabular cup with morcellized allograft has been used by Badhe and Howard [30] in the management of severe acetabular deficiencies. Early results have shown encouraging restoration of bone stock, with no case of aseptic loosening. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of using a longitudinal oblong revision (LOR) cup in the management of types III and IV acetabular defects. Patients Materials and Methods Between January 1995 and October 2000, 35 patients (22 men [63%] and 13 women [37%]) underwent acetabular reconstruction using an LOR component. Their mean age was 63.8 years (range = years). The indications for LOR cup implantation were aseptic loosening in 31 patients (88.6%), dysplasia of the hip because of congenital subluxation that caused a dysplastic hip with a defect in the superior aspect of the acetabulum in 1 patient (3%), and reimplantation after resection arthroplasty in 3 patients (8.6%). The prerevision acetabular bone deficiency was categorized according to the classification of D Antonio et al [31]. There were 29 type III (83%) and 6 type IV (17%) defects. The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 8 years (mean = 6.3 years), except for the 2 cases that failed 1 year postoperatively and required a new revision. All cases were operated by the same group of surgeons who used this cup. Other surgeons in our center used other techniques, such as morcellized cancellous bone grafting and cement as well as reinforcement rings. Revision Cup The LOR cup (Allopro Sulzer, Winterthur, Switzerland) consists of a titanium shell and a polyethylene inlay. It has an oblong shape with the superoinferior dimension greater than the anteroposterior dimension. The transverse diameter ranges from 52 to 72 mm, in 4-mm steps. There are 2 shells available for each transverse diameter, 1 elongated by 6 mm and another 1 by 12 mm longitudinally. Two rows of holes are arranged parallel to the outer rim of the shell to take the titanium screws. The polyethylene inlay has the articular surface centrally positioned in the 6-mm longitudinally elongated sockets and central or 6 mm caudally displaced in the 12-mm elongated sockets. Operative Technique A posterolateral approach was used in 28 cases (80%) and an anterolateral approach was in 7 (20%). The acetabulum was prepared with spherical reamers by which the longitudinal dimension of the acetabulum was widened, removing protrusions of the bony bed. The anteroposterior diameter of the acetabulum was preserved. Defects were filled with bone chips in all cases. Structural allografts were used in 2 cases. Morcellized allograft was added in all cases. We considered that cup contact was complete when intraoperatively we achieved a continuous contact between the cup periphery and the acetabular rim. When there were areas with a lack of contact, we considered that the contact was partial or incomplete. Cup contact with the acetabular rim was considered complete in 30 cases (85.7%) and partial in 5 (14.3%), with a lack of contact of 20% in 3 cases and of 30% in 2 cases in which structural allograft was added. An average of 3.8 screws (range = 2-7) was used for fixation. Usually the best screw fixation was obtained superiorly, but additional stabilization can be achieved by placing further screws in the pubis and ischium. The polyethylene inlay had the articular surface centrally positioned in 18 cases (51.4%) and eccentrically in 17 (48.6%). Of the 35 hips, 19 had loose femoral components, which were revised; 13 had well-fixed femoral components (5 cemented and 8 cementless), which were not revised; and 3 had a resection arthroplasty and had no femoral component. Of the 19 hips in which a femoral component was implanted, 8 were implanted with an anatomical revision stem with hydroxyapatite coating (Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) and 11 were with a straight revision stem with hydroxyapatite coating (DePuy, Warsaw, Ind). A 28-mm head size was used in all the patients. Postoperatively, protected weight bearing for 3 months with bilateral crutches was allowed, except for patients with type IV defect, who were advised non weight bearing for 3 months. Radiographic Assessment Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were made before surgery and immediately after surgery, at 3 months, at 6 months, at 1 year, and then at 1-year intervals.
3 The Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup! Herrera et al 859 radiographic evaluation as (1) stable, when there was no definite migration, no continuous radiolucent line wider than 2 mm at the bone-cup interface, no radiolucency adjacent to screws, and no breakage or back out of screws; (2) probably unstable, when there was no definite migration but there was breakage or migration of screws or a continuous periacetabular radiolucent line wider than 2 mm; (3) unstable, when there was definite migration (N48 of change in the abduction angle or N4 mm of medial or superior movement of the cup). Clinical Evaluation Several parameters were assessed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up evaluation: the Harris hip score, the pain, the limp, the use of walking aids, the functional level, and the limp-length discrepancy. Patient satisfaction was subjectively measured by asking the following 3 questions: Has the operation increased function and daily activity? Has the operation decreased hip pain? Are you satisfied with the result of the operation? Fig. 1. Radiographic assessment. a indicates height of the hip center; b, horizontal location of the hip center; c, abduction angle; d, height of the cup. Statistical Methods Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test, Fisher s Exact test, or 2-tailed unpaired Student s t test. Preoperatively, the following parameters were measured (Fig. 1): the acetabular deficiency according to the classification of D Antonio et al [31]; the height of the hip center; the horizontal location of the hip center; the abduction angle measured from the horizontal line through the inferior margin of both teardrops to the line through the inferior limit of the cup; and the height of the inferior edge of the cup, which was the distance between the inferior edge of the cup and the interteardrop line (a positive measurement indicated that the caudal edge of the cup was proximal to the line and a negative measurement indicated that caudal edge of the cup was distal to the line). Postoperatively, evaluation included the same parameters except for the acetabular defect. We classified the stability of the cups at the latest Results Of the 35 patients, 1 died, in whom the cup was stable, after the 5-year control. All patients had a full clinical and radiographic follow-up. Radiographic findings The following radiographic findings were noted: The preoperative average height of the hip center was 37.9 mm (range = mm). The postoperative average height of the hip center was 28.6 mm (range = mm). The hip center was lowered an average of 9 mm (range = 4-30 mm). The preoperative average horizontal location of the hip center was 40.4 mm (range = mm). The postoperative average horizontal location of the hip center was 35.6 mm (range = mm). This location was an average of 4.7 mm (range = 0-14 mm) medial to the preoperative position.
4 860 The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 21 No. 6 September 2006 The preoperative average abduction angle was (range = ). The postoperative average abduction angle was (range = ). The abduction angle was decreased an average of 6.48 (range = ). The preoperative average location of the inferior edge of the cup was 9.3 mm (range = 7 to 42 mm). The postoperative average location of the inferior edge of the cup was 2.4 mm (range = 13 to 26 mm). This edge went down an average of 11 mm (range = 0-18 mm). At the latest follow-up, 30 cups were stable (85.8%; Fig. 2A-C) and 5 components (14.2%) were unstable. These 5 components needed a revision. Of these cups, 2 failed 1 year after surgery (Fig. 3A-C) and 3 did 4 years postoperatively. In addition, 4 of these unstable components had been implanted in type III defects and 1 was in a type IV defect. The abduction angle was significantly increased in the group of unstable cups ( P =.032) because of the migration of the acetabular component that became more vertical. There was a statistically significant relation between incomplete cup contact with the acetabular rim and subsequent failure ( P =.047). We did not find significant differences between the groups of stable and unstable cups respect to patient age, patient body weight, number of screws used for stabilization, acetabular deficiency, postoperative height of the hip center, postoperative horizontal location of the hip center, postoperative Fig. 2. A, Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis of a 63-year-old woman who had had a right total hip arthroplasty 12 years previously. B, The type III acetabular defect was revised using an LOR component. C, The cup was stable 5 years after the revision.
5 The Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup! Herrera et al 861 Fig. 3. A, Anteroposterior radiograph of a 72-year-old woman who had had a right total hip arthroplasty 14 years previously. B, The type IV acetabular defect was revised using an LOR component and morcellized bone graft. C, The cup was loose 1 year postoperatively. height of the inferior edge of the cup, and use of central or eccentric polyethylene. Clinical findings The following clinical findings were noted: The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 37 points (range = points). The mean hip score at the latest follow-up was 79 points (range = points). The improvement was statistically significant ( P b.01). Pain before the operation was severe in 23 hips (65.7%) and moderate in 12 (34.3%). At the time of the latest follow-up, 16 hips (45.7%) were pain free, 14 (40%) were mildly painful, 2 (5.7%) were moderately painful, and 3 (8.5%) were severely painful. Overall, pain had significantly decreased postoperatively ( P b.0001). Of the 5 patients who had a loose acetabular component, 2 had moderate pain and the other 3 had severe pain. Preoperatively, 29 patients (82.9%) had a severe limp and 6 (17.1%) had a moderate limp. At the latest postoperative follow-up, 11 patients (31.4%) had no limp, 19 (54.2%) had a moderate limp, and 5 (14.2%) had a severe limp. Overall, limp had significantly decreased postoperatively ( P b.0001). Preoperatively, 33 patients (94.3%) needed fulltime support and 2 (5.7%) needed a cane for long walks. At the latest postoperative follow-up, 8 patients (22.9%) did not need assistive devices to walk, 19 (54.3%) used a cane on long walks, and 8 (22.9%) needed full-time support. Overall, the need for walking aids had significantly decreased postoperatively ( P b.0001). Preoperatively, 4 patients (11.4%) could walk 4 to 6 blocks, 10 (28.6%) could walk 2 to 3 blocks, and 21 (60%) could walk indoors only. At the latest follow-up, 10 patients (28.6%) could walk an unlimited distance, 18 (51.4%) could walk 4 to 6 blocks, 3 (8.6%) could walk 2 to 3 blocks, and 4 (11.4%) could walk indoors only. Overall, functional level had significantly increased postoperatively ( P b.0001). The average preoperative limb-length discrepancy was 1.8 cm shorter on the involved side (range = cm). Ten patients (28.6%) had a discrepancy of 1 cm or less, 11 (31.4%) had a difference between 1 and 2 cm, and 14 (40%) had a difference of more than 2 cm. The average postoperative discrepancy was 0.5 cm. Thirty patients (85.7%) had a discrepancy of 1 cm or less, 3 (8.6%) had a difference between 1 and 2 cm, and 2 (5.7%) had a difference of more than 2 cm. The average improvement was 1.3 cm (range = cm). This improvement was statistically significant ( P b.0001). Of the patients, 30 (85.7%) were satisfied with the result of the operation, 32 (91.4%) had improved function and daily activity, and 32 (91.4%) had less pain as compared with their pain before the operation.
6 862 The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 21 No. 6 September 2006 Complications There were 3 intraoperative femoral fractures around the tip of the stem that were treated with internal fixation. A total of 3 patients had sciatic nerve palsies, 1 of which resolved completely and 2 persisted, consequently requiring the patients to use an ankle-foot orthosis. There were 2 cases of deep venous thrombosis, 2 cases of late femoral fractures (1 of them treated surgically and the other with rest and a thigh orthosis), 2 cases of early dislocation that had no additional dislocation after an initial closed reduction, 1 case of late dislocation that did not recur after closed reduction, and 4 cases of heterotopic ossifications that caused a moderate limitation of joint mobility. A total of 5 patients required cup revision because of cup failure, 2 of them 1 year after surgery and the 3 remaining 4 years postoperatively. There was one case of superficial wound infection that was treated by debridement and antibiotic therapy. There was no case of pulmonary embolism. Discussion Several technical approaches have been used to overcome the difficulties in revising failed acetabular components. Minor defects can usually be managed with standard implants. In larger defects, there are several alternatives. The use of structural allografts is controversial. The failure rate has ranged from 13% to 47%, and acetabular failure has increased significantly with longer follow-up evaluation [9-12]. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and a cemented cup has been proven to provide a good long-term result, with a survival rate of 94% [13-15]. Reinforcement rings and structural or morcellized bone graft have been used successfully to manage severe segmental or combined defects where there is limited host bone available to provide cup support [16-22]. Reported failure rates have oscillated between 10% and 50%. The best results have been obtained in cavitary deficiencies; the worst, in combined defects. Cementless acetabular components have been used with satisfactory results [1-7], but their problem is that it is not possible to obtain a good fixation in large defects without using allografts. The best results have been obtained in hips with a bone defect of less than 30%; the worst, when the bone defect was greater than 50% and a structural bone graft was used to stabilize the prosthesis [2]. Large hemispherical cementless components fixed with screws have been used successfully in large defects [8], but the complication rate was high (dislocation, late infection, trochanteric osteotomy nonunion). An important problem in revision arthroplasty is that when we try to convert an oblong defect to a hemisphere to insert an uncemented hemispheric component, usually of extra large size, the required reaming can damage the bone stock of the anterior and posterior columns of the acetabulum. An alternative option of reconstruction that avoids large allografts or excessive reaming is the use of porous-coated oblong acetabular implants. There are 2 types of oblong cups: the bilobed oblong acetabular component and the LOR cup. The theoretical advantages of these cups are an increased surface contact area between the porous component and native host acetabular bone, the avoidance of structural bone grafts, and the potential to normalize the center of rotation. The main disadvantage is the lack of bone stock restoration. There are few published clinical results about these cups. Bilobed oblong acetabular cups have been used by several authors [27-29]. DeBoer and Christie [29] and Berry et al [27] reported good results at early to midterm follow-up. They recommend this implant for large superolateral bone deficiencies. Chen et al [28] reported an early rate of loosening of 24%. They believe that this device is indicated in an oblong-shaped acetabular defect, with an intact medial wall of the acetabulum, when a surgeon wants to correct an elevated hip center. Longitudinal oblong revision cups have been used by Sutherland [24-26] and by Kfster et al [23]. Initial series were very small [24-26]. The largest series was published by Kfster et al [23], who reported favorable results in 98 acetabular revisions at midterm follow-up, with a success rate of 98%. In this series, there were 21% segmental deficiencies, 42% cavitary defects, 32% combined defects, and 5% pelvic discontinuities. This could explain these excellent results, because the primary stability of the cup usually is very good in segmental or cavitary defects. In our series, the LOR cup was used in types III and IV defects. Our loosening rate was higher than that of Kfster et al [23], but they reported that all cup migrations observed in their series occurred in major defects.
7 The Longitudinal Oblong Revision Cup! Herrera et al 863 We think that the LOR socket is suitable to be used in types III and IV defects. In type IV defects, the possibility of obtaining fixation with screws in the ilium, pubis, and ischium allows achieving an acceptable stabilization of the pelvic discontinuity. Owing to the oblong shape of the defect, the form of this cup allows better contact with the remaining bone and loads distribution than if it were hemispherical. However, we think that the stability of the reconstruction could be improved by treating pelvic discontinuities with plate fixation before reconstructing the defect with the LOR cup in type IV defects. Oblong cups are designed to restore the position of the hip center. In our series, we did not find a significant relationship between the postoperative height of the hip center and the outcome. We found that an increased postoperative abduction angle and an incomplete contact of the cup with the acetabular rim significantly worsened the outcome. Schutzer and Harris [32] have recommended using a high hip center technique by means of a standard small hemispherical cup screwed high on the ilium to bypass the acetabular defect and gain stability on healthy host bone. However, Yoder et al [33] noted that cups placed in a nonanatomical, superolateral position had a significantly higher femoral component loosening rate compared with those placed in an anatomical position. The midterm clinical and radiographic results using the LOR cup in our series of patients with types III and IV defects have been encouraging. The longitudinal oblong form of the cup obviates the need for bulky structural allografts to fill the superior defect or the need for excessive reaming to obtain a hemispheric acetabulum. The initial anchorage of the implant was achieved by means of the contact of the cup with the acetabular rim and the added screw fixation. References 1. Chareancholvanich K, Tanchuling A, Seki T, et al. Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; 361: García-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery. A 6- to 11-year followup study. J Arthroplasty 1999;14: Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, et al. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76-A: Moskal JT, Danisa OA, Shaffrey CI. Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component. A 3- to 9-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1997;12: Silverton CD, Rosenberg AG, Sheinkop MB, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless acetabular component. Clin Orthop 1995;319: Woolson ST, Adamson GJ. Acetabular revision using a bone-ingrowth total hip component in patients who have acetabular bone stock deficiency. J Arthroplasty 1996;11: Jones CP, Lachiewicz PF. Factors influencing the longer-term survival of uncemented acetabular components used in total hip revisions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A: Dearborn JT, Harris WH. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components. An average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:8. 9. Avci S, Connors N, Petty W. 2- to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects. J Arthroplasty 1998;13: Lee BP, Cabanela ME, Wallrichs SL, et al. Bone-graft augmentation for acetabular deficiencies in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12: Morand F, Clarac JP, Gayet LE, et al. Reconstruction cotylordienne par allogreffe osseuse dans les révisions de prothèse totale de hanche. Rev Chir Orthop 1998; 84: Stiehl JB, Saluja R, Diener T. Reconstruction of major column defects and pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: Schreurs BW, van Tienen TG, Buma P, et al. Favorable results of acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellized bone grafts in patients younger than 50 years. A 10- to 18-year follow-up study of 34 cemented total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72: Slooff TJJH, Buma P, Gardeniers JWM, et al. Revision of the acetabular component: bone packing. In: Callaghan JJ, Rosenberg AG, Rubash HE, editors. The adult hip, vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; p Welten MLM, Schreurs BW, Buma P, et al. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morcellized cancellous bone autograft and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty. A 10- to 17-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: Brady OH, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, et al. Perspectives on modern orthopaedics: use of reconstruction rings for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision hip surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7: Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Mqller ME. The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: Kerboull M, Hamadouche M, Kerboull L. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions. Clin Orthop 2000;378:155.
8 864 The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 21 No. 6 September Massin P, Tanaka C, Huten D, et al. Traitement des descellements acétabulaires aseptiques par reconstruction associant greffe osseuse et anneau de Mqller. Analyse actuarielle sur 11 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 1998;84: Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Woodgate I, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring. A case series with a 10 year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: Van der Linde M, Tonino A. Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72: Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, et al. The Burch- Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery. A mean follow-up of 12 years. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: Kfster G, Willert HG, Kfhler HP, et al. An oblong revision cup for large acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 1998;13: Sutherland CJ. Early experience with eccentric acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 1996;25: Sutherland CJ. Treatment of type III acetabular deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty without structural bone-graft. J Arthroplasty 1996;11: Sutherland CJ. Management of type III acetabular deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty without structural bone-graft. J South Orthop Assoc 1998; 7: Berry DJ, Sutherland CJ, Trousdale RT, et al. Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000; 371: Chen WM, Engh Jr CA, Hopper RH, et al. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82-A: DeBoer DK, Christie MJ. Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 1998;13: Badhe NP, Howard PW. Partially hydroxyapatitecoated stemmed acetabular cup and nonstructural bone-graft in the management of severe acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplasty 2000;15: D Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; 243: Schutzer SF, Harris WH. High placement of porouscoated acetabular components in complex total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994;9: Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, et al. Total hip acetabular position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop 1988;228:79.
Management Of Acetabular Deficiency In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Series Of 15 Cases
ISPUB.COM The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery Volume 21 Number 2 Management Of Acetabular Deficiency In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Series Of 15 Cases G Khanna, R Sharma, D Singh, T A Chandy Citation
More informationSURGICAL TECHNIQUE. Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Protrusio Cage A COMPREHENSIVE ACETABULAR REVISION SYSTEM Important: This essential product information does not include all of the information necessary for selection and use of a device.
More informationClinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2010, 76, 58-62 ORIGINAL STUDY Clinical and radiological results of the stemmed Mc Minn cup in hip revision surgery Pax WILLEMSE, Rene M. CASTELEIN, Paul L. P. A. BOM, Aart VERBURG,
More informationThe Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity During Acetabular Revision
The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 20 No. 4 Suppl. 2 2005 The Treatment of Pelvic Discontinuity During Acetabular Revision Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS,*y Michael O Rourke, MD,z and Wayne G. Paprosky, MD, FACS*y
More informationShort-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA
n Feature Article Short-term Results of a Custom Triflange Acetabular Component for Massive Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision THA Michael A. Wind Jr, MD; Michael L. Swank, MD; Joel I. Sorger, MD abstract
More informationRECOVERY. P r o t r u s i o
RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e RECOVERY P r o t r u s i o TM C a g e Design Features Revision acetabular surgery is a major challenge facing today s total joint revision surgeon. Failed endo/bi-polars,
More informationComparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional Hip Arthroplasty
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 29(1): 24-29, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.1.24 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Comparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional
More informationEarly results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2013, 79, 530-535 ORIGINAL STUDY Early results of Trabecular Metal augment for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty Ibrahim Elganzoury, Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony From
More informationManaging Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision
This is an enhanced PDF from The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery The PDF of the article you requested follows this cover page. Managing Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision Scott M. Sporer, Wayne G. Paprosky
More informationORIGINAL PAPER. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu Medical Center ABSTRACT
Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 71. 145 ~ 150, 2009 ORIGINAL PAPER AUTOGENOUS BULK STRUCTURAL BONE GRAFTING FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ACETABLUM IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: AVERAGE 12-YEAR FOLLOW-UP TETSUO MASUI,
More information*smith&nephew CONTOUR
Surgical Technique *smith&nephew CONTOUR Acetabular Rings CONTOUR Acetabular Rings Surgical technique completed in conjunction with Joseph Schatzker MD, BSc (Med.), FRCS (C) Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS (C)
More informationTEN YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH NONCEMENTED REVISION SOCKETS. Lawrence D. Dorr, MD Zhinian Wan, MD
""'".."c.",".~" ""ill""."""'""'" I TEN YEARS EXPERIENCE WITH NONCEMENTED REVISION SOCKETS. Lawrence D. Dorr, MD Zhinian Wan, MD f ABSTRACT A prospective study was completed on 167 noncemented revision
More informationThe custom triflange cup
ACETABULAR REVISION The custom triflange cup BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME G. P. Goodman, C. A. Engh Jr From Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute The custom triflange is a patient-specific implant for
More informationCotyloplasty in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for an Insufficient Acetabulum
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2010;2:148-153 doi:10.4055/cios.2010.2.3.148 Cotyloplasty in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for an Insufficient Acetabulum Yong Lae Kim, MD, Kwang Woo
More informationThe use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up
Ding et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (2015) 10:77 DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0222-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support
More informationCase report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?
Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis? Diagnosis: Ceramic head fracture In the 1970 s, Boutin implemented ceramic in modern total hip arthroplasty (THA).
More informationEXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION
EXTENDED TROCHANTERIC OSTEOTOMY SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FPO EXTENSIVELY COATED FIXATION SINCE 1983 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING EXPLANTATION OPTIONS the cement from inside the cement canal until the bone/ cement bond
More informationRevision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 28(2): 98-103, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2016.28.2.98 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with
More informationPelvic discontinuity
THE REVISION HIP Pelvic discontinuity CURRENT SOLUTIONS J. Petrie, A. Sassoon, G. J. Haidukewych From Orlando Regional Medical Center, Florida, United States Pelvic discontinuity represents a rare but
More informationTemplating and Pre Operative Planning 2. Preparation of the Acetabulum 4. Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5.
Surgical Technique Contents Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum 4 Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5 Cup Positioning 6 Joint Stability 7 Trial sizing and Impaction
More informationRevision hip arthroplasty with S-ROM prosthesis: a study of clinical outcomes and implant stability
J Orthopaed Traumatol () 7:1 1 DOI 1.17/s1195--15- ORIGINAL M. El-Deen S. Zahid D.T. Miller A. Nargol R. Logishetty Revision hip arthroplasty with S-ROM prosthesis: a study of clinical outcomes and implant
More informationOrthopaedic Surgery Hip
Transverse Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Severe Hip Developmental Dysplasia Myung-Sik Park Professor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chonbuk National University
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Surgical Technique Optimum implant geometry Extending proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationTotal Hip Arthroplasty Performed Using Conventional and Computer-Assisted, Tissue- Preserving Techniques 6
Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Using Conventional and Computer-Assisted, Tissue- Preserving Techniques 6 Stephen B. Murphy, MD, Timo M. Ecker, MD and Moritz Tannast, MD Introduction Less invasive techniques
More informationPorous metal augments
THE REVISION HIP Porous metal augments BIG HOPES FOR BIG HOLES M. Abolghasemian, S. Tangsataporn, A. Sternheim, D. J. Backstein, O. A. Safir, A. E. Gross From Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto,
More informationCONGENITAL HIP DISEASE IN YOUNG ADULTS CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT WITH THA. Th. KARACHALIOS, MD, DSc PROF IN ORTHOPAEDICS
CONGENITAL HIP DISEASE IN YOUNG ADULTS CLASSIFICATION AND TREATMENT WITH THA Th. KARACHALIOS, MD, DSc PROF IN ORTHOPAEDICS EDITOR IN CHIEF HIP INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF THESSALIA, LARISA HELLENIC REPUBLIC
More informationCancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Cancellous Impaction Bone Grafting of Acetabular Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Nilesh Patil, MD; Katherine Hwang, MS; Stuart B. Goodman, MD, PhD abstract Full article available
More informationEffect of Superior Placement of the Hip Center on Abductor Muscle Strength in Total Hip Arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 24 No. 2 2009 Effect of Superior Placement of the Hip Center on Abductor Muscle Strength in Total Hip Arthroplasty Takahiko Kiyama, MD, Masatoshi Naito, MD, PhD, Hiroshi
More informationCIRCUMFERENTIAL PROXIMAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS IN REVISION SURGERY ON TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CASE REPORTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 20 YEARS
CASE REPORT CIRCUMFERENTIAL PROXIMAL FEMORAL ALLOGRAFTS IN REVISION SURGERY ON TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: CASE REPORTS WITH A MINIMUM FOLLOW-UP OF 20 YEARS Bruno Dutra Roos 1, Milton Valdomiro Roos 2, Antero
More informationACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
ACETABULAR CUP SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ACETABULAR CUP DEVICE INDICATIONS FOR USE The ICONACY I-Hip total hip replacement is indicated for the following conditions: 1. A severely painful and/or disabled hip
More informationThis publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE DePuy Synthes DURALOC Surgical Technique CONTENTS Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum
More informationThe aging epidemic is upon us. The baby boomer
Bulletin Hospital for Joint Diseases Volume 62, Numbers 1 & 2 2004 47 Management of Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly Elton Strauss, M.D. The aging epidemic is upon us. The baby boomer generation is
More informationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, US.
ISSN: 2572-2964 Volume 2, Issue 1, 6 Pages Research Article Acetabular fractures can complicate hip arthroplasty and result in higher rates of intraoperative complications and worse long-term outcomes
More informationManagement of Acetabular Fractures by Prosthetic Hip Replacement
Med. J. Cairo Univ., Vol. 82, No. 2, March: 7-82, 204 www.medicaljournalofcairouniversity.net Management of Acetabular Fractures by Prosthetic Hip Replacement ABDULLAH AL-ZAHRANI, M.D. The Department of
More informationThe Birmingham Interlocking Pelvic Osteotomy (BIPO) for Acetabular Dysplasia: 13 to 21 Year Survival Outcomes
The Birmingham Interlocking Pelvic Osteotomy (BIPO) for Acetabular Dysplasia: 13 to 21 Year Survival Outcomes Omer Mei-Dan, MD Dylan Jewell, BSc, MSc, FRCS Tigran Garabekyan, MD Jason Brockwell, FRCSEdOrth
More informationTrabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments Surgical Technique
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments Surgical Technique Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System Buttress and Shim Augments 1 Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision
More informationExtensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III Defects
Extensively Porous-coated Stems for Femoral Revision: Reliable Choice for Stem Revision in Paprosky Femoral Type III Defects Lien-Hsiang Chung, MD; Po-Kuei Wu, MD; Cheng-Fong Chen, MD; Wei-Ming Chen, MD;
More informationBone Bangalore
Dr Suresh Annamalai MBBS, MRCS(Edn), FRCS( Tr & Orth)(Edn), FEBOT(European Board), Young Hip and Knee Fellowship(Harrogate, UK) Consultant Arthroplasty and Arthroscopic Surgeon Manipal Hospital, Whitefield,
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationBone Preservation Stem
TRI-LOCK Bone Preservation Stem Featuring GRIPTION Coating Surgical Technique Implant Geometry Extending the TRI-LOCK Stem heritage The original TRI-LOCK Stem was introduced in 1981. This implant was
More informationFavorable outcome of total hip arthroplasty with insufficient bone coverage of the roof reinforcement ring: a case report.
Favorable outcome of total hip arthroplasty with insufficient bone coverage of the roof reinforcement ring: a case report. Fernando Judas*, Miguel Nascimento**, Manuel Caetano**, Marcos Carvalho**, Francisco
More informationFracture of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement: A Case Report
Syracuse University SURFACE Biomedical and Chemical Engineering College of Engineering and Computer Science 1997 Fracture of an Acetabular Component Inserted without Cement: A Case Report R T. Trousdale
More informationRevision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stem
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2009;1:105-109 doi:10.4055/cios.2009.1.2.105 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Extensively Porous Coated Femoral Stem Kyoung Ho Moon, MD, Joon Soon
More informationPinnacle revision cup in acetabular surgery Results at 2 to 5 years
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2013, 79, 392-397 ORIGINAL STUDY Pinnacle revision cup in acetabular surgery Results at 2 to 5 years Alain Dalemans, Sascha Colen, Marcus van Diemen, Michiel Mulier From the University
More informationCombined Pelvic Osteotomy in the Treatment of Both Deformed and Dysplastic Acetabulum Three Years Prospective Study
Prague Medical Report / Vol. 106 (2005) No. 2, p. 159 166 159) Combined Pelvic Osteotomy in the Treatment of Both Deformed and Dysplastic Acetabulum Three Years Prospective Study Al Razi Orthopedic Hospital,
More informationCementless Total Hip Arthroplasty with Medial Wall Osteotomy for the Sequelae of Septic Arthritis of the Hip
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2009;1:19-26 doi:10.4055/cios.2009.1.1.19 Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty with Medial Wall Osteotomy for the Sequelae of Septic Arthritis of the Hip Myung
More informationAML Hip System. Design Rationale/ Surgical Technique
AML Hip System Design Rationale/ Surgical Technique Design Rationale Evolution In 1977, DePuy Synthes Companies introduced the original cementless total hip. The AML Hip launched in order to solve one
More informationOptimizing function Maximizing survivorship Accelerating recovery
Surgical Technique Optimizing Function Maximizing Survivorship Accelerating Recovery The company believes in an approach to patient treatment that places equal importance on: Optimizing function Maximizing
More informationHYDROXYAPATITE IN REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS WITH MASSIVE ACETABULAR DEFECTS
HYDROXYAPATITE IN REVISION OF TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS WITH MASSIVE ACETABULAR DEFECTS 4- TO 10-YEAR CLINICAL RESULTS H. OONISHI, Y. IWAKI, N. KIN, S. KUSHITANI, N. MURATA, S. WAKITANI, K. IMOTO From Osaka-Minami
More informationHIP SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
HIP SYSTEM SURGICAL TECHNIQUE Introduction...2 Preoperative Planning...3 Preoperative Planning...3 Templating and Radiographs...4 Determination of Leg Length Discrepancy...5 Determining Acetabular Cup
More informationRevision Total Hip Replacement
Revision Total Hip Replacement Dr. (Prof.) Anil Arora MS (Ortho) DNB (Ortho) Dip SIROT (USA) FAPOA (Korea), FIGOF (Germany), FJOA (Japan) Commonwealth Fellow Joint Replacement (Royal National Orthopaedic
More informationEarly catastrophic failure of Birmingham acetabular dysplasia cup in revision arthroplasty: a case report Manjunath Ramappa* and Andrew Port
Open Access Case report Early catastrophic failure of Birmingham acetabular dysplasia cup in revision arthroplasty: a case report Manjunath Ramappa* and Andrew Port Address: Department Of Orthopaedics,
More informationA 42-year-old patient presenting with femoral
Kanda et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports 2015, 9:17 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS CASE REPORT Open Access A 42-year-old patient presenting with femoral head migration after hemiarthroplasty performed
More informationFEMORAL REVISION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY
FEMORAL REVISION IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY Jean-Noël Argenson, MD Professor and Chairman of Orthopedic Surgery Hip and Knee Replacement The Aix-Marseille University Hopital Sainte-Marguerite Marseille,
More informationPrinciples of acetabular fixation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz, Anna WAGNER
Principles of acetabular fixation in primary and revision hip arthroplasty Piotr Wojciechowski, Damian Kusz, Anna WAGNER Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Medical University of Silesia Head of
More information111. ACETABULAR FIXATION
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH Number 369, pp. 157-164 0 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 111. ACETABULAR FIXATION IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY Fixation, Polyethylene Wear, and
More informationOptimum implant geometry
Design Rationale Optimum implant geometry Extending the proven Tri-Lock heritage The original Tri-Lock was introduced in 1981. This implant was the first proximally coated tapered-wedge hip stem available
More informationPINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM
PINNACLE REVISION CUP SYSTEM This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. DESIGN RATIONALE FLEXIBILITY. PRECISION. CONFIDENCE. DePuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction is proud to offer the
More informationPERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP ARTHOPLASTY
PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES FOLLOWING TOTAL HIP ARTHOPLASTY Jon Minter, DO Arthritis and Total Joint Specialists Atlanta, Georgia ArthritisAndTotalJoint.Com Intra Op Incidence of Periprosthetic Hip Fractures
More informationRx90 Total Hip System Acetabular Series
Rx90 Total Hip System Acetabular Series The Rx90 Total Hip System was developed by Stanley Asnis, M.D., in conjunction with David Dines, M.D. and Micheal Errico M.D., Co-Section-Chiefs of the North Shore
More informationDESIGN RATIONALE AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
DESIGN RATIONALE AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ANCHOR PEG GLENOID DESIGN RATIONALE In total shoulder arthroplasty, most cases of clinical and radiographic loosening involve failure of the fixation of the glenoid
More informationDoes the self-centering mechanism of bipolar hip endoprosthesis really work in vivo?
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2005;13(1):46-51 Does the self-centering mechanism of bipolar hip endoprosthesis really work in vivo? H Tsumura, N Kaku, T Torisu Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Oita University,
More informationApproach Patients with Confidence
Surgical Technique Approach Patients with Confidence The ACTIS Total Hip System is the first DePuy Synthes stem specifically designed to be utilized with tissue sparing approaches, such as the anterior
More informationAcetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study with Minimum One-year Follow-up
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 29(3): 168-175, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.168 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Acetabular Defect Reconstruction with Trabecular Metal Augments: Study
More informationPLR. Proximal Loading Revision Hip System
PLR Proximal Loading Revision Hip System The PLR splined revision stem is designed to recreate the natural stresses in the revised femur, where proximal bone may be compromised. PLR Hip System Design Considerations
More informationEvaluating and Treating Acetabular Bone Loss with Pelvic Discontinuity
Evaluating and Treating Acetabular Bone Loss with Pelvic Discontinuity Neil P. Sheth, MD Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery Kuala Lumpur MALAYSIA July 03, 2017 Consultant Zimmer PERSONA TKA evaluation
More informationShunsaku Nishihara 1, Nobuhiko Sugano 1, Takashi Nishii 1, Hisashi Tanaka 2, Hideki Yoshikawa 1, and Takahiro Ochi 1
J Orthop Sci (2003) 8:352 360 Comparison of the fit and fill between the Anatomic Hip femoral component and the VerSys Taper femoral component using virtual implantation on the ORTHODOC workstation Shunsaku
More informationAugmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty
Clin Orthop Relat Res (2008) 466:579 583 DOI 10.1007/s11999-007-0104-4 SYMPOSIUM: NEW APPROACHES TO SHOULDER SURGERY Augmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty Robert S. Rice
More informationManza Cup HA SURGICAL TECHNIQUE.
1 PRE-OPERATIVE PLANNING. Preoperative assessment of the appropriate size and position of the acetabular component will provide intraoperative guidance for acetabular reaming. To determine the acetabluar
More informationThe necessity to restore the anatomic hip centre in congenital hip disease
Perspective Page 1 of 5 The necessity to restore the anatomic hip centre in congenital hip disease George A. Macheras, Panagiotis Lepetsos, Panagiotis P. Anastasopoulos, Spyridon P. Galanakos Fourth Department
More information28 Surgical Technique
Surgical Technique 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 28 26 Technique described by James L. Guyton, MD Campbell Clinic Memphis, Tennessee James W. Harkess, MD Campbell Clinic Memphis, Tennessee David G. LaVelle,
More informationA preliminary evaluation of raising the center of rotation in total hip arthroplasty for the patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip
Original Article Page 1 of 6 A preliminary evaluation of raising the center of rotation in total hip arthroplasty for the patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip Jiandong He 1#, Yi Wang 2#, Liang
More informationTOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT:
THR Prosthesis Design TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: PROSTHESIS DESIGN FEATURES JESS JOHNSTON & MELINDA ZIETH History of Hip Prosthesis Joint Replacement Registry Implant Design Technology & Future History and
More informationMidterm Results Of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) In Developmental Dysplasia Of The Hip (DDH)
ISPUB.COM The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery Volume 23 Number 1 Midterm Results Of Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) In Developmental Dysplasia Of The Hip (DDH) A Öner, A Köksal, O D Tunç, M B Balioğlu,
More informationApproach Patients with Confidence
Approach Patients with Confidence The is the first stem specifically designed to be utilized with tissue sparing approaches, such as the anterior approach, as well as traditional approaches. The implant
More informationTradition Hip Primary Surgical Technique
Design Rationale Many total hip designs in today s marketplace do not take advantage of the known forces present in the femur. Long term stability of a total hip prosthesis requires an implant design and
More informationDevelopmental Dysplasia of the Hip Good Results of Later Total Hip Arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 23 No. 2 2008 Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Good Results of Later Total Hip Arthroplasty 7135 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties after Developmental Dysplasia of the
More informationThe Fate of Revised Uncemented Acetabular Components in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH Number 400, pp. 140 148 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. The Fate of Revised Uncemented Acetabular Components in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Michael
More informationOne Stage or Two Stage
Dr. (Prof.) Anil Arora MS (Ortho) DNB (Ortho) Dip SIROT (USA) FAPOA (Korea), FIGOF (Germany), FJOA (Japan) Commonwealth Fellow Joint Replacement (Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK) Senior
More informationCementless Acetabular Fixation With and Without Screws
Cementless Acetabular Fixation With and Without Screws Analysis of Stability and Migration The Journal of Arthroplasty Vol. 25 No. 2 2010 Richard Iorio, MD,* Brian Puskas, MD,y William L. Healy, MD,* John
More informationReprint requests: Dr Brenda Dower CLINICAL ARTICLE SA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL Spring 2012 Vol 11 No 3 / Page 29
CLINICAL ARTICLE SA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL Spring 2012 Vol 11 No 3 / Page 29 C L I N I C A L A RT I C L E The results of a cementless acetabular component combined with impaction bone grafting in patients
More informationMetha Short Hip Stem System
Metha Short Hip Stem System Accuracy That Stands Alone Aesculap Orthopaedics Metha Short Hip Stem System Designed For Anatomic Accuracy The Metha Short Hip Stem is designed for anatomic accuracy to restore
More informationFemoral Revision Algorithm. A practical guide for the use of the CORAIL Hip System in femoral revision surgery
Femoral Revision Algorithm A practical guide for the use of the CORAIL Hip System in femoral revision surgery Introduction The principles that govern the mode of prosthetic fixation, implant stability
More informationDURALOC. Acetabular Cup System. Surgical Technique
DURALOC Acetabular Cup System Surgical Technique Table of Contents Surgical Technique Templating and Pre Operative Planning 2 Preparation of the Acetabulum 4 Trial Sizing and Impaction of the Shell 5
More informationArcos Modular Femoral Revision System
Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System Arcos System Simplify the Complex The Arcos Modular Femoral Revision System meets the demands of complex hip revision surgery by offering surgeons and OR staff the
More informationPRODUCT RATIONALE & SURGICAL TECHNIQUE
This publication is not intended for distribution in the USA. PRODUCT RATIONALE & SURGICAL TECHNIQUE THE PRODUCT OF LONG-TERM CLINICAL EXPERIENCE The TRILOC cemented UHMWPE cup is a direct descendant of
More informationCOI. Consulting-TJO, United Institutional Support- Smith & Nephew, Acelity-KCI, Stryker, USMI
Difficult Primary Anterior Hip Replacement RLO November 17 th 2017 Capital City Club George Guild MD COI Consulting-TJO, United Institutional Support- Smith & Nephew, Acelity-KCI, Stryker, USMI Success
More informationEncina Taper Stem. Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA
Stinson Orthopedics Inc. 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600 Redwood City, CA 94065 info@stinsonortho.com www.stinsonortho.com Table of Contents Introduction 3 Features 4 Surgical Technique 5 Preoperative
More informationLate Results of Total Shoulder Replacement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH Number 366, pp. 39-45 0 1999 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Late Results of Total Shoulder Replacement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Jens 0. S@jbjerg,
More informationKEY CHOICES AND TECHNIQUES IN REVISION THA AND TKA Step-by-Step Decisions
KEY CHOICES AND TECHNIQUES IN REVISION THA AND TKA Step-by-Step Decisions Moderator: Panelists: Daniel J Berry, Mayo Clinic John J Callaghan William L Griffin Thomas P Vail Michael P Bolognesi Presenter
More informationBone Grafting for Total Joint Arthroplasty
Bone Grafting for Total Joint Arthroplasty 263 14 Bone Grafting for Total Joint Arthroplasty Biology and Clinical Applications Moussa Hamadouche, MD, Daniel A. Oakes, MD, and Daniel J. Berry, MD INTRODUCTION
More informationREVISING THE DEFICIENT PROXIMAL FEMUR
REVISING THE DEFICIENT PROXIMAL FEMUR by David Mattingly, Boston, MA Joseph McCarthy, Boston, MA Benjamin E. Bierbaum, Boston, MA Hugh P. Chandler, Boston, MA Roderick H. Turner, Boston, MA Hugh U. Cameron,
More informationThe Müller acetabular reinforcement ring still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years
Acta Orthop. Belg., 2015, 81, 257-263 ORIGINAL STUDY The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years C. Kösters, B.
More informationNavigation for total hip arthroplasty
Interact Surg (2008) 3: 128 134 Springer 2008 DOI 10.1007/s11610-008-0084-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Navigation for total hip arthroplasty O. Guyen 1,V.Pibarot 1, J. Bejui-Hugues 2,SCORGroup 1 Service de chirurgie
More informationThe shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 2003: 11(1): 53 58 The shape and size of femoral components in revision total hip arthroplasty among Chinese patients KY Chiu, TP Ng, WM Tang Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
More informationCAUTION: Ceramic liners are not approved for use in the United States.
Total Hip Prostheses, Self-Centering Hip Prostheses and Hemi-Hip Prostheses IMPORTANT: This essential product information sheet does not include all of the information necessary for selection and use of
More informationSURGICAL TECHNIQUE CEMENTED & PRESS-FIT UNIFIED INSTRUMENTATION INTRAOPERATIVE FLEXIBILITY PROVEN BIOMECHANICS
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE CEMENTED & PRESS-FIT UNIFIED INSTRUMENTATION INTRAOPERATIVE FLEXIBILITY PROVEN BIOMECHANICS INTRODUCTION The Summit Tapered Hip System s comprehensive set of implants and instruments
More informationOutcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hip Pelvis 27(3): 146-151, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.146 Print ISSN 2287-3260 Online ISSN 2287-3279 Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
More informationEnhanced Stability Constrained Liners. Design Rationale Surgical Technique
Enhanced Stability Constrained Liners Design Rationale Surgical Technique The Pinnacle Acetabular Cup System was designed to maximize the number of options available to the surgeon, and provide those options
More informationExposure EXPOSURE. Exposure - Incision. Extend old incision proximally Expose virgin quadriceps tendon
Exposure Aaron G Rosenberg MD Professor of Orthopedic Surgery Rush Medical College Chicago, Illinois Exposure - Incision Single incision can be used or modified Multiple longitudinal incisions favor the
More information