Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
|
|
- Madison Harrington
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product. Before prescribing any product mentioned in this Register, healthcare professionals should consult prescribing information for the product approved in their country. Study No.: NPP30006 Title: An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Lamotrigine in Subjects with Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Rationale: The current open-label study was initiated to evaluate the long-term safety (up to 40 weeks) of LTG in subjects with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). Phase: III Study Period: 04 April September 2004 Study Design: Open-label, uncontrolled Centres: 52 in the United States Indication: Painful diabetic neuropathy Treatment: In the preceding double-blind studies subjects were randomized to receive LTG 200, 300, or 400mg/day or matching placebo. In order to maintain the treatment blind in NPP30004/NPP30005, subjects who previously participated in NPP30004 or NPP30005 had their dose adjusted as necessary in a blinded fashion through Week 5 so that by Week 6 all subjects began receiving LTG 200mg/day. During Weeks 7 and 8, the subjects increased their daily dose by weekly increments of 100mg/day based on tolerability. After the subject had reached the highest tolerated dose or 400mg/day, the subject continued on that dose for the remainder of the study. After completing the Maintenance Phase or if terminated after Week 5, subjects tapered off investigational product during the first week of the Follow-up Phase (100mg BID on Days 1-3 of taper and 50mg BID on Days 4-6 of taper). Subjects who had not participated in the double-blind study, but who met enrollment criteria following completion of the NPP30006 Baseline Phase, initiated open-label treatment at Visit 1 of the Dose-Adjustment Phase. Subjects received LTG daily doses of 25mg during Weeks 1-2, 50mg during Weeks 3-4, 100mg at Week 5, and 200mg at Week 6. Thereafter, treatment regimens were as described above. Objectives: The primary objective was to assess the long-term (up to 40 weeks) safety of open-label LTG in subjects with pain associated with diabetic neuropathy. Primary Outcome Variable: See Safety Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Secondary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline in the SF- McGill total pain quality, affective and sensory scores; change from baseline in the neuropathy pain scale (NPS) score; proportion of subjects who were much improved or very much improved in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and also in the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Health outcome assessments included change from baseline in: Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status scores, Profile of Mood States (POMS) scores, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) scores, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scores, and time lost from Workplace Productivity and Social Activity (WPSA) scores Statistical Methods: Adverse events were classified by body system and Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Affairs (MedDRA) preferred term and were tabulated by treatment group, maximum intensity, seriousness, and attributability to study drug. Summary statistics of clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis) data were generated. Change from baseline vital sign data (blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate) and ECG interval data (HR, PR, QRS, QT, QTc) were summarized using 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). Secondary efficacy endpoints: change from baseline in the SF-McGill total pain quality, affective and sensory scores; change from baseline in NPS score were summarized using 95% CIs; proportion of subjects who were much improved or very much improved in PGIC and CGIC were also summarized. The Safety Population comprised all subjects who took at least one dose of study drug. The Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Efficacy Population comprised all subjects who took at least one dose of study drug and provided at least one baseline and at least post-baseline efficacy measurement. Study Population: Male or female subjects 18 years of age who had completed the Maintenance Phase of a double-blind study of LTG (NPP30004 or NPP30005) or met the following criteria: a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus; screening hemoglobin A1c level 11% and stable glycemic control for 3 months prior to study entry; diabetic neuropathy at screening defined by bilateral decreased or absent reflexes at the ankles or bilateral decreased vibration, pinprick, fine touch or temperature perception in the distal lower extremities; pain associated with diabetic neuropathy for 6 months, but 5 years; mean pain score 4 during Baseline Phase using an 11-point numerical rating scale, and at least four pain observations recorded on the Baseline diary. All Subjects Number of Subjects: Planned, N 358 Randomised, N 495
2 Completed, n (%) 252 (51) Total Number Subjects Withdrawn, N (%) 243 (49) Withdrawn due to Adverse Events n (%) 88 (18) Withdrawn for other reasons n (%) 155 (31%) Demographics N (Safety) 491 Females: Males, n 215:276 Mean Age, years (SD) 59.9 (10.44) White, n (%) 421 (86) Primary Outcome Results(s): See Safety Secondary Outcome Variable(s): PGIC: Patient Global Impression of Change Rated as improved or very much improved at study exit visit (termination), n (%) 278 (58) CGIC: Clinician Global Impression of Change Rated as improved or very much improved at study exit visit (termination), n (%) 261 (54) NPS: Neuropathy Pain Scale Pain intensity (question # 1) Mean Baseline Score (SD) 6.2 (2.24) Mean Score at exit visit (termination) 3.5 (2.68) Mean Change from Baseline (SD) -2.7 (3.23) 95% Confidence interval (CI) of mean -3.0, -2.4 Total NPS Scores Mean Baseline Score (SD) 5.2 (1.81) Mean Score at exit visit (termination) 3.0 (2.18) Mean Change from Baseline (SD) -2.2 (2.37) 95% Confidence interval (CI) of mean -2.4, -2.0 SF-McGill Total pain quality score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 15.3 (9.89) Mean Score at exit visit (termination) 10.0 (9.27) Mean Change from Baseline (SD) -5.2 (10.60) 95% Confidence interval (CI) of mean -6.2, -4.3 Affective pain quality score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 12.2 (7.39) Mean Score at exit visit (termination) 8.0 (7.09) Mean Change from Baseline (SD) -4.2 (8.20) 95% Confidence interval (CI) of mean -4.9, -3.4 Sensory pain quality score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 3.0 (3.12) Mean Score at exit visit (termination) 2.0 (2.63) Mean Change from Baseline (SD) -1.7 (3.32) 95% Confidence interval (CI) of mean -1.3, -0.8 Health Outcome Analyses SF-36 health outcome status scores Health status Mean Baseline Score (SD) (12.539) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) (18.319) 95% CI of mean -5.22, Physical functioning Mean Baseline Score (SD) (26.582) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) ( ) 95% CI of mean -7.78, Role physical Mean Baseline Score (SD) (40.484) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) ( )
3 95% CI of mean , Bodily pain Mean Baseline Score (SD) (18.599) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) (22.061) 95% CI of mean , General health Mean Baseline Score (SD) (21.521) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) ( ) 95% CI of mean -4.51, Vitality Mean Baseline Score (SD) (22.076) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) (19.229) 95% CI of mean -8.78, Social functioning Mean Baseline Score (SD) (26.494) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) (27.433) 95% CI of mean -5.89, Role emotion Mean Baseline Score (SD) (40.172) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 2.80 (42.657) 95% CI of mean -1.08, 6.68 Mental health Mean Baseline Score (SD) (18.763) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) (17.462) 95% CI of mean -3.51, 0.06 Time lost from workplace productivity and social activity (WPSA) Productivity Loss of work due to pain Mean Baseline Score (SD) 0.94 (0.200) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.19 (0.415) 95% CI of mean 0.12, 0.26 Social Loss of social activity due to pain Mean Baseline Score (SD) 0.77 (0.333) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.05 (0.414) 95% CI of mean 0.01, 0.10 Effective work Mean Baseline Score (SD) 0.91 (0.192) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.06 (0.210) 95% CI of mean 0.03, 0.09 BPI Worst pain score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 5.7 (1.73) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 1.9 (2.37) 95% CI of mean 1.7, 2.1 Pain interference score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 4.6 (2.30) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 1.5 (2.15) 95% CI of mean 1.3, 1.7 CES-D Total depression score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 13.1 (10.18) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) -0.0 (8.76) 95% CI of mean -0.8, 0.8 POMS Total score Mean Baseline Score (SD) 28.8 (36.71)
4 Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 2.9 (28.21) 95% CI of mean 0.4, 5.5 Tension/Anxiety Mean Baseline Score (SD) 9.4 (6.75) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.1 (5.63) 95% CI of mean -0.4, 0.6 Depression/Dejection Mean Baseline Score (SD) 9.6 (10.42) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.3 (8.59) 95% CI of mean -0.4, 1.1 Anger/Hostility Mean Baseline Score (SD) 7.0 (7.62) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 0.2 (6.68) 95% CI of mean -0.5, 0.8 Vigor/Vitality Mean Baseline Score (SD) 15.0 (6.89) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) -1.2 (5.62) 95% CI of mean -1.7, -0.7 Fatigue/Inertia Mean Baseline Score (SD) 11.1 (6.78) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) 1.3 (5.47) 95% CI of mean 0.8, 1.89 Confusion/Bewildered Mean Baseline Score (SD) 6.7 (5.29) Mean change from baseline at exit visit (termination); (SD) -0.2 (4.02) 95% CI of mean (-0.5, 0.2) Most Frequent Adverse Events (>5% of Subjects) On-Therapy LTG N = 491 Any Event, n (%) 396 (81) Any Rash (includes all rash related terms) 70 (14) Rash 30 (6) Dizziness 55 (11) Headache 48 (10) Nausea 42 (9) Arthralgia 43 (9) Balance Disorder 33 (7) Upper Respiratory Tract Infection 28 (6) Edema Peripheral 28 (6) Back Pain 27 (5) Pain in Extremity 26 (5) Hypertension 26 (5) Serious Adverse Events On Therapy n (%) [n considered by the investigator to be related to study medication] LTG N = 491 Subjects with any SAEs 1, Includes both fatal and non-fatal events 60 (12) [6] Congestive heart failure 6 (1) [0] Coronary artery disease 5 (1) [0] Myocardial Infarction 5 (1) [0] Atrial fibrillation 4 (<1) [1] Sinus bradycardia 1 (<1) [1] Angina pectoris 1 (<1) [0] Angina unstable 1 (<1) [0] Bradyarrhythmia 1 (<1) [0] Cardiac disorder 1 (<1) [0]
5 Myocardial ischemia 1 (<1) [0] Ventricular fibrillation 1 (<1) [0] Chest pain 7 (1) [0] Asthenia 1 (<1) [0] Impaired healing 1 (<1) [0] Pyrexia 1 (<1) [0] Bronchitis 2 (<1) [0] Cellulitis 2(<1) [0] Gangrene 1 (<1) [0] Influenza 1 (<1) [0] Localized infection 1 (<1) [0] Pneumonia 1 (<1) [0] Pneumonia bacterial 1 (<1) [0] Intestinal Obstruction 2(<1) [0] Vomiting 2(<1) [0] Diarrhea 1 (<1) [0] Gastric ulcer 1 (<1) [0] Gastroesophageal reflux disease 1 (<1) [1] Peptic ulcer hemorrhage 1 (<1) [0] Cerebrovascular accident 2 (<1) [0] Syncope 2 (<1) [1] Cerebral infarction 1 (<1) [0] Diabetic hyperosmolar coma 1 (<1) [0] Dizziness 1 (<1) [0] Ligament injury 1 (<1) [0] Lower limb fracture 1 (<1) [0] Neck injury 1 (<1) [0] Pelvic fracture 1 (<1) [0] Radius fracture 1 (<1) [0] Road traffic accident 1 (<1) [0] Dehydration 1 (<1) [0] Diabetic foot 1 (<1) [0] Hypoglycemia 1 (<1) [0] Hypokalemia 1 (<1) [0] Hypovolemia 1 (<1) [0] Metabolic acidosis 1 (<1) [0] Asthma 1 (<1) [0] Bronchospasm 1 (<1) [0] Dyspnea 1 (<1) [0] Pulmonary edema 1 (<1) [0] Respiratory distress 1 (<1) [0] Respiratory failure 1 (<1) [0] Musculoskeletal chest pain 1 (<1) [0] Neck pain 1 (<1) [0] Breast cancer 1 (<1) [0] Colon cancer 1 (<1) [0] Cholecystitis 2 (<1) [0] Renal failure acute 1 (<1) [0] Urethral obstruction 1 (<1) [0] Lymphangitis 1 (<1) [0] Orthostatic hypotension 1 (<1) [0] Anemia 1 (<1) [0] Vestibular disorder 1 (<1) [0] Mental status change 1 (<1) [1] Rash Toxic skin eruption 1 (<1) [1]
6 Subject with fatal SAEs 1 (<1) [0] Myocardial infarction 1 (<1) [0] Note: a subject may have experienced more than one SAE. Conclusion: Adverse events were reported in 396 (81%) of the subjects, with the most frequently reported events being Any Rash, dizziness and headache. Serious adverse events were reported in 60 (12%) of the subjects with the most frequently reported being congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. One death was reported. Publications: No publication Date Updated: 23-May-2005
Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: LOV Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary-
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationFull Novartis CTRD Results Template
Full Novartis CTRD Results Template Sponsor Novartis Generic Drug Name vildagliptin Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes Protocol Number CLAF237A23138E1 Title A
More informationAllergan Not Applicable AGN A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose, Parallel
Peripheral Neuropathy Design, Dose Ranging Study of the Safety and Efficacy of AGN 203818 in Patients with Painful Diabetic 203818-004. A Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationClinical Trial Results Summary Study EN3409-BUP-305
Title of Study: A 52-Week, Open-Label, Long-Term Treatment Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of BEMA Buprenorphine in Subjects with Moderate to Severe Chronic Pain Coordinating Investigator: Martin
More informationStudy No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationUMEC/VI vs. UMEC in subjects who responded to UMEC UMEC/VI vs. VI in subjects who responded to VI
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationIndividual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:
2.0 Synopsis Abbott Laboratories Name of Study Drug: ABT-639 Name of Active Ingredient: ABT-639 Individual Study Table Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page: (For National Authority Use Only) Title
More informationStudy No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationEfficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Teriparatide Combination Therapy in Women With Osteoporosis
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health Trial record 1 of 1 for: CZOL446H2409 Previous Study Return to List Next Study Efficacy Study of Zoledronic Acid and Combination Therapy in Women With
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: TAG IDAG Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationHM2008/00566/00. study and to obtain clinical experience with the use of this drug. Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): <Pharmacokinetics>
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationAnalysis of immunogenicity
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationIndication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable: Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s): Statistical Methods:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: Not Applicable
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationThe clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.
The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationmg 25 mg mg 25 mg mg 100 mg 1
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationNilotinib AEs (adverse events) in CML population:
Nilotinib AEs (adverse events) in CML population: The percentages below were taken from a randomized trial of nilotinib 300mg BID in newly diagnosed Ph+ CML patients (N=279) taken from the Tasigna 2017
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSponsor. Novartis. Generic Drug Name. Vildagliptin. Therapeutic Area of Trial. Type 2 diabetes. Approved Indication. Type 2 diabetes.
Sponsor Page 1 Novartis Generic Drug Name Vildagliptin Therapeutic Area of Trial Type 2 diabetes Approved Indication Type 2 diabetes Study Number CLAF237A2308 Title A multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationClinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-525, NCT#
Clinical Trial Synopsis, NCT#00762736 Title of Study: A Phase II, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Proof-of-Concept Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS
More informationThe population of subjects which was statistically analyzed was the Intent-to-Treat population
Study No.: ARIB3003 (Year 1) Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Year Parallel-Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of GI198745 in the Treatment and Modification of Progression
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:
GSK Medicine: abacavir (ABC)/dolutegravir (DTG)/lamivudine (3TC) Study Number: 201147 Title: A IIIb, randomized, open-label study of the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of switching to a fixed-dose
More informationStudy No.: SFCA3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS
Study No.: A3007 Title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, -Controlled, Parallel-Group Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of the DISKUS Formulations of Salmeterol (SAL) 50mcg BID and Fluticasone Propionate
More informationClinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#
Clinical Trial Synopsis, NCT# 00225264 Title of Study: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing the Effects of Pioglitazone HCl vs Glimepiride
More informationSoleus 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml. Tibialis posterior 75 (6 ml) 0 (6 ml) 75 (6 ml) Total 300 (24 ml) 0 (24 ml) 300 (24 ml) Dose: U (solution volume)
Study No.: BTX108512 Title: A Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Post-Stroke lower Limb Spasticity Receiving a Double-Blind, -Controlled GSK1358820 Treatment Followed
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No: Title: Rationale: . Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationInstruct patient and caregivers: Need for constant monitoring Potential complications of drug therapy
Assessment Prior to administration: Assess patient for chest pain, dysrhythmias, and vital signs (initially and throughout therapy) Obtain complete medical history, including allergies, especially heart
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).
Drug product: Drug substance(s): Document No.: Edition No.: Study code: Date: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 µg Budesonide/formoterol SD-039-0725 17 February 2005 SYNOPSIS A Twelve-Week, Randomized, Double-blind,
More informationStudy No Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):
Studies listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationTitle of Study: Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Galantamine in Patients With Dementia of Alzheimer's Type Who Failed to Benefit From Donepezil
SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor/Company Name of Finished Product REMINYL Name of Active Ingredient(s) Galantamine hydrobromide Issue Date: 18 October 2013 Protocol No.: Title of Study: Evaluation of Efficacy
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
Study No.: 29060/717 Title: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Fixed-Dose Study of CR Intermittent Dosing (12.5 mg and 25 mg) for Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder Rationale: In most trials investigating
More informationClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 10/11/2013. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT
ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 10/11/2013 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00168454 Study Identification Unique Protocol ID: 191622-077 Brief Title: A
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
he study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationGSK Medicine: Study Number:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationTHE FRAMINGHAM STUDY Protocol for data set vr_soe_2009_m_0522 CRITERIA FOR EVENTS. 1. Cardiovascular Disease
THE FRAMINGHAM STUDY Protocol for data set vr_soe_2009_m_0522 CRITERIA FOR EVENTS 1. Cardiovascular Disease Cardiovascular disease is considered to have developed if there was a definite manifestation
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationDosimetric Dose: 450 mg of TST infused over 70 minutes (inclusive of a 10-minute flush) immediately followed by 35
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: Not Applicable
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: This drug is not marketed in the United States.
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationClinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-516, NCT#
Clinical Trial Synopsis, NCT#00225277 Title of Study: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Comparator-Controlled Study in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Comparing the Effects of Pioglitazone HCl Versus
More informationSYNOPSIS. Date 15 June 2004
Drug product Drug substance(s) Document No. Edition No. Study code SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 mg per actuation Budesonide/formoterol SD-039-0719 Date 15 June 2004 SYNOPSIS A Six-Month, Randomized, Open-Label
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Sponsor/company: Sanofi-Aventis. Date: 08/02/ 2008
These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert in the country of prescription Sponsor/company: Sanofi-Aventis ClinicalTrials.gov
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationChemotherapy must not be started unless the following drugs have been given:
BC Cancer Protocol Summary for Second-Line Therapy for Metastatic or Locally Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer Using Weekly PACLitaxel and Ramucirumab Protocol Code: Tumour Group: Contact
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variables:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSYNOPSIS. Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Study code SD Date 16 December 2004
Drug product SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 µg SYNOPSIS Drug substance(s) Budesonide/formoterol Document No. Edition No. Date 16 December 2004 A Twelve-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Placebo-Controlled
More informationStudy No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of
Study No.: 49653/020 Title: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Rosiglitazone vs. Glibenclamide Therapy, When Administered
More informationSponsor: Sanofi Drug substance(s): Lantus /insulin glargine. Study Identifiers: U , NCT Study code: LANTUL07225
These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert in the country of prescription. Sponsor: Sanofi Drug substance(s):
More informationPFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationThe clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.
The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only. Please note that the results reported in any single trial may not reflect the overall
More informationBRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis
Report Synopsis Study Title: A Multicenter, Open-label, Six-Month Extension Study to Assess the Long-term Safety of Paroxetine in Children and Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Obsessive-Compulsive
More informationPFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. PROPRIETARY DRUG NAME / GENERIC DRUG NAME: Lyrica / PROTOCOL
More informationClinical Trial Synopsis
Clinical Trial Synopsis Title of Study: A Phase III, Open-Label, Fixed-Dose Study to Determine the Safety of Long-Term Administration of TAK-375 in Subjects With Chronic Insomnia Protocol Number: Name
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Co-Primary Outcomes/Efficacy Variables:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSecondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication
Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1 Sponsor Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name Therapeutic Area of Trial Major depressive disorder Approved Indication Investigational drug Study
More informationThis clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.
abcd Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data. The synopsis which is part of the
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Study vaccines Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationThe study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationPFIZER INC. Study Center(s): A total of 6 centers took part in the study, including 2 in France and 4 in the United States.
PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert. For publications based on this study, see associated bibliography.
More informationStudy No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:
The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not reflect the overall results obtained on studies of a product.
More informationSummary of Phase 3 IMPACT Trial Results Presented at AUA Meeting Webcast Conference Call April 28, Nasdaq: DNDN
Summary of Phase 3 IMPACT Trial Results Presented at AUA Meeting Webcast Conference Call April 28, 2009 Nasdaq: DNDN PROVENGE sipuleucel-t is an autologous active cellular immunotherapy that activates
More informationSYNOPSIS. First subject enrolled 15 August 2003 Therapeutic confirmatory (III) Last subject completed 03 February 2005
Drug product: SYMBICORT pmdi 160/4.5 μg Drug substance(s): Budesonide/formoterol Study code: SD-039-0728 Edition No.: FINAL Date: 27 February 2006 SYNOPSIS A 52-week, randomized, double-blind, single-dummy,
More information