Nerilee Flint University of South Australia Methodological Conundrums: Confessions of a latent grounded theorist.
|
|
- Domenic Byrd
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FLI05040 Nerilee Flint University of South Australia Methodological Conundrums: Confessions of a latent grounded theorist. ABSTRACT This paper has been developed from a study that is investigating undergraduate tertiary students perceptions of the fairness of educational assessment. Whilst most academics have an idea of what they think constitutes fairness in assessment they possibly do not know or appreciate what the students think. Indeed, what are the students perceptions? More than this, how do you take such varied opinions and make sense of them? Grounded theory, Glaserian style (Glaser & Strauss, 1967; Glaser 1978, 1996, 1998, 2003) has helped me to make sense of what students are saying about fairness in assessment. This paper focuses on the methodological approach I have used in addressing the topic. It makes explicit what grounded theory is and is not. The paper describes the convoluted process I went through as a researcher attempting grounded theory for the first time and what I would do if beginning again. The presentation provides some suggestions for people wishing to avoid the pitfalls and work in the exciting world of grounded theory. Those interested in grounded theory, fairness in educational assessment, and the confessions of an at times very bemused PhD candidate might find this paper interesting. INTRODUCTION A grounded theory approach based on the work of Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Glaser (1978; 1992; 1996; 1998; 2001; 2003) is used in my investigation of undergraduate tertiary students perceptions of the fairness of educational assessment. The purpose of this paper is to identify and explain the methodology chosen. This paper supports the presentation where I outline some of the specific issues I faced using this methodology for the first time. It is hoped that this information might assist other people who wish to use grounded theory methodology. SELECTION OF A QUALITATIVE DESIGN: USING A GROUNDED THEORY APPROACH The study for which this methodology is used aims to investigate understandings, meanings, and peoples perceptions therefore an interpretive, qualitative method is the most appropriate (Berg 1989; Minichiello et al. 1995; Mertens 1998; Taylor & Bogdan 1998; Bogdan & Biklen 2003). It was Stern s (1980 p20) suggestion that the strongest case for the use of grounded theory is in investigations of relatively unchartered waters, or to gain a fresh perspective in a familiar situation that first led me to considering grounded theory for this study as whilst initially contradictory both of these conditions fit my area of investigation relatively unchartered yet familiar. There is an absence of literature on the topic of undergraduate students perceptions of fairness of educational assessment 1
2 whilst at the same time the topic seems to be one that many educators feel knowledgeable about. The topic of assessment in universities is a complex and often emotive one with many interrelated issues, variables and concerns that can be viewed from extremely different perspectives. The method of constant comparison used in grounded theory methodology offers strategies to deal with this complexity. By using grounded theory I have been able to produce a conceptual theory which has helped me to understand the core problem for students related to assessment and how they go about resolving that problem. BUT WHAT IS GROUNDED THEORY? The methodological and theoretical underpinnings of grounded theory arise from the collaborative work of Anselm Strauss from the Chicago school of qualitative research and Barney Glaser who was trained in quantitative research, methodology and theory generation at Columbia University (Glaser 1998). They were sociologists with different philosophic and research backgrounds who worked together to develop a technique for analysing qualitative data called grounded theory which was published in 1967 in The Discovery of Grounded Theory. The key disciplinary tradition that helped inform grounded theory was symbolic interactionism and even though it is neither homogeneous nor monolithic in orientation (Meltzer, Petras & Reynolds 1975) some understanding of the meaning of symbolic interactionism in relation to grounded theory is necessary but beyond the scope of this paper. There has been considerable adoption of grounded theory research in disciplines outside its originating domain of sociology including management, business, health, education, social welfare, marketing, health sciences, psychology, political science, and art (Glaser 1978; 1998; 1999; Locke 2001). This was initially due to the students of the co-originators taking up the approach, along with the continual but separate work of Glaser and Strauss. The methodology was designed to allow a researcher to arrive at theory suited to its supposed uses (Glaser & Strauss 1967 p3). This went against the dominant functionalist approach to research whereby quantitative studies were viewed as the only form of systematic social scientific inquiry. Also distinguishing grounded theory from other forms of research at the time was the emphasis on generating rather than verifying theory and the emphasis on achieving a theory that is relevant, works, fits, and is modifiable (Glaser & Strauss 1967; Glaser 1978). The latter four criteria will be discussed later in the paper. Grounded theory differs from other methodologies in a number of ways (Glaser & Strauss 1967; Glaser 1978). These can be summarised as the following: Rather than adhering to a series of linear steps the researcher collects and analyses data simultaneously. Constant comparison between data is done in a systematic and continuous effort to check and refine emerging categories. 2
3 The data shapes the processes and products of the research rather than preconceived logically deduced theoretical frameworks. This means that grounded theorists begin with general research questions rather than tightly framed hypotheses. In grounded theory research literature is read once the theory is well developed and it becomes apparent what form of literature needs to be read. It is incorporated into the theory if relevant. This relies on the researcher having and developing a theoretical sensitivity to what might emerge. Traditional quantitative canons of verification are not followed, rather developing ideas are checked with further specific data collection or theoretical sampling and the advancing theory determines the data collection. Grounded theorists study process and assume that making theoretical sense of social life is itself a process. They seek to discover a core category which all other categories revolve around or a basic social process so that ultimately they develop a theory which explains behaviour rather than a description of the situation. In essence grounded theory research is a method for discovering theories, concepts, hypotheses, and propositions directly from data rather than from a priori assumptions, other research, or existing theoretical frameworks (Taylor & Bogdan 1998 p137). Amongst many other things Glaser (1992) says the research question should not predetermine the study, rather the focus is determined by the problem which emerges as data is collected and analysed. In Glaser s (1992 p22) terms you move into an area of interest without a problem in your mind and instead you have abstract wonderment of what is going on that is an issue and how it is handled. You identify the area of inquiry but not the research problem (MacDonald 2001 p139). My study began with an area of interest, the fairness of assessment in terms of undergraduate tertiary students perceptions, and from this the research problem developed. The research question did not define the parameters of the study and the data collection and analysis determined what I focused on. The results of the analysis determined the boundaries of the study, not the research question. EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF GROUNDED THEORY Within the grounded theory ranks there are disputes with different interpretations of what it is being promoted (Glaser 1992; Strauss, A & Corbin 1998). Until recently the evolution and development of grounded theory could be viewed as taking one of two paths. One path was further elaboration by Glaser of the original works Discovery of Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss 1967) and Theoretical Sensitivity (Glaser 1978) by Glaser in numerous publications (1992; 1993; 1994; 1996; 1998; 2001; 2003). This path also includes other authors such as Stern (1994b) who offered clarification of the terminology used in an attempt to demystify the method. 3
4 The second path could be viewed as the development of a more formulaic and procedural approach with alignment to more generalised qualitative analysis (Strauss, AL 1987; Strauss, A & Corbin 1998). Stern (1994a) believes that Strauss and later Strauss and Corbin were responding to critics of grounded theory, as described in the Discovery book, who saw it as loose, lacking verification, and having a tangled description. This resulted, according to Stern (1994a p220), in a modification of the description of grounded theory from its original concept of emergence to a densely codified strictured operation. Glaser maintains a purist or orthodox position on grounded theory and he has generally remained faithful to the original propositions. His viewpoint is quite simple, if you do something different to this you cannot call it grounded theory. He has consistently claimed that if you follow the total methodological package outlined in the original works and subsequent publications you may call your work grounded theory (Melia 1996; Glaser 1999). More recently the question of what grounded theory is has taken a different slant (Greckhamer & Koro-Ljungberg 2005) and for many the debate is now broader than whether one is Straussian or Glaserian aligned. At the centre of the recent debate is the social constructivist version of grounded theory proposed by Kathy Charmaz (1994; 2003). She critiques the objectivist leanings of both Glaser and the now deceased Strauss, and his more recent co-author, Corbin, and suggests that their positioning is at times close to positivistic. Charmaz (2003 p269) proposes researchers can use grounded theory methods to conduct constructivist studies derived from interpretive approaches, that is, to further their knowledge of subjective experience and to expand its representation while neither remaining external from it nor accepting objectivist assumptions and procedures. This constructivist orientation resonates with many grounded theorists who see it as adopting a position part way between positivism and post-modernism, the inference of Charmaz being that if one does not claim the constructivist position then one must be labelling oneself objectivist and positivist. As a beginning researcher in grounded theory the confusion brought about by the complexity of discussion about what grounded theory is and is not can be quite frustrating. This is further complicated by the fact that Glaser (2002) does not articulate his epistemological beliefs when he criticises the constructivist approach of Charmaz. Glaser s (2002) main argument with Charmaz is that her version of grounded theory is in fact another type of research which he calls Qualitative Data Analysis (QDA). According to Glaser this has accurate description as its main goal, something his version of grounded theory does not. It is at this level that I am in agreement with Glaser as I am not claiming to have developed a theory which is a mutually constructed interpretation of the data. I have raised the perspectives of the students to an abstract level of conceptualisation in an attempt to see an underlying pattern. GLASERIAN GROUNDED THEORY: THE TERMINOLOGY AND THE PROCESS Drawing from Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Glaser (1978; 1992; 1998) this section maps out the terminology and process involved in conducting Glaserian grounded theory. It explains how the constant comparative method of coding and analysis generate an inductive theory which describes the behaviour of the substantive group. 4
5 Coding data The purpose of coding is to move from having a set of data to developing a theory. It is to get the analyst off the empirical level by fracturing the data, then conceptually grouping it into codes that then become the theory which explains what is happening in the data (Glaser 1978 p55). The conceptual code is the essential relationship between data and theory. As Glaser (1978 p55) states, in generating a theory by developing the hypothetical relationships between conceptual codes (categories and their properties) which have been generated from the data as indicators, we discover a grounded theory. Data collection and analysis occur simultaneously which allows the researcher to identify gaps in the data and data sources to fill those gaps. Data are collected by whichever means is relevant to the study. This could include observations, conversations, reports, newspapers, letters, videotapes, biographies, documents, autobiographies, journals, interviews (structured, semi-structured, unstructured), or focus group interviews. Multiple data sources are often sought as are a wide range of perspectives and understandings of the phenomenon of study. In this study interviews with undergraduate students of a semi-structured and at times unstructured nature were the main source of data. Twenty four interviews have been conducted to date and at this stage I envisage perhaps another three or four might be needed to complete my analysis. Substantive coding: open The initial coding of data is called open coding. It is the fracturing of data into analytic pieces which can then be raised to conceptual level (Glaser 1978 p56) and it starts when data collection begins. The analyst does not wait for all data to be collected, as the results of the coding influence the collection of the data. The analyst codes the incidents into categories and properties of categories. A category is a group of codes, a conceptual element of the theory whilst a property is a conceptual aspect or element of a category. Whilst looking at the data the analyst has three types of questions in mind (Glaser 1978; 1998): What is this data a study of? What category does this incident indicate? What category or property of a category, of what part of the emerging theory, does this incident indicate? What is actually happening in the data? Or, what is the chief concern or problem of the people? These types of questions are asked while constantly comparing incident to incident and coding and analysing. The coding can be done by noting in margins, writing on cards, using a computer software program (although not Glaser s recommendation), as long as the researcher can keep track of them. 5
6 The basic, defining rule of the constant comparative method of grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss 1967 p106) is applied, that is while coding an incident for a category, compare it with the previous incidents in the same and different groups coded in the same category. Open coding initially happens very quickly with the creation of an enormous amount of codes but as they are compared and it is determined if they fit, eventually they are saturated and their true relevance is found among the other codes. This will result in theoretical properties of a category emerging and eventually a core category, which the majority of other categories seem connected to, becomes obvious. To assist the analyst in deciding on a core category Glaser (1978 pp95-96) lists criteria that must apply, including that a core category must be related to as many other categories and their properties as possible, it must reoccur frequently in the data, it therefore will take more time to saturate, and the connection with the other categories will be meaningful and not forced. A core category may be a particular type that deals with process in some way, and if it has two or more clear emergent stages it is referred to as a Basic Social Process (BSP). Glaser (Glaser 1978 p97) explains that a BSP is labelled by a gerund, it ends with an ing, and this gives it a feeling of process, change and movement over time. Examples are seeking, cultivating, highlighting, becoming, and demonstrating. Substantive coding: selective Once the analyst has found a variable that meets the criteria of a core category, selective coding begins. To selectively code for a core variable means that the analyst delimits his coding to only those variables that relate to the core variable in sufficiently significant ways to be used in a parsimonious theory (Glaser 1978 p61). The analyst is guided by the core variable and in turn the core variable determines further data collection through theoretical sampling to maximise differences in the data and to help saturate the categories. The researcher in selective coding looks for the conditions and consequences that relate to the core process. Theoretical coding Theoretical coding often occurs simultaneously with substantive coding. Whilst substantive coding is the greater focus when discovering codes within the data, theoretical coding tends to happen more when the researcher is theoretically sorting and integrating memos. According to Glaser (1978) theoretical codes conceptualise how the substantive codes may relate to each other as hypotheses to be integrated into a theory, they weave the fractured story back together (p72). Substantive codes could be related without theoretical codes but often the result is confused and unclear theoretically. In addition to helping with the analysis, theoretical codes also assist the analyst to maintain a conceptual level in writing about concepts and their interrelations. Glaser (Glaser 1998 p164) suggests that the grounded theorist should talk substantive codes and think theoretical codes when writing. As for substantive codes, theoretical codes must earn their way into the data. Glaser believes researchers find it hard to grasp theoretical codes and that many rely on one 6
7 code rather than consider a range. To assist analysis Glaser (1978) provides details of eighteen coding families and in Glaser (1998) additional codes are presented with further explanation of some of the original ones. Glaser (1978 p74) refers to the coding family of the 6Cs as the bread and butter theoretical code, it comprises Causes, Contexts, Contingencies, Consequences, Covariances, and Conditions, as it is the first general code to keep in mind when coding data. He suggests most studies fit into either a causal, consequence or condition model however warns not to force a pet code onto data as this pre-conception can force data a particular way. Theoretical completeness Theoretical completeness is when the researcher has been able to account for as much variation in a pattern of behaviour with as few concepts as possible thereby maximizing parsimony and scope (Glaser 1978 p93). It is the aim of the constant comparison process, the goal of grounded theory. The key to achieving theoretical completeness is in the memoing process. Theoretical completeness is also dependent on the theoretical sorting of the memos to achieve saturation. Further explanation of the memoing process, saturation and sorting follows. Memos and memo writing Memos are the theorizing write-up of ideas about substantive codes and their theoretically coded relationships (Glaser 1998 p177). It is not grounded theory without memo writing. Memoing is a constant process throughout the study, beginning when first coding data and continuing until the paper or thesis is written. The analyst writes memos of her or his ideas prompted by coding, collecting data, reading literature, reading earlier memos, or sorting memos as it will accomplish one or more of the following aspects of generating theory: It raises the data to a conceptualisation level It develops the properties of each category which begins to define it operationally It presents hypotheses about connections between categories and/or their properties It begins to integrate these connections with clusters of other categories to generate the theory It begins to locate the emerging theory with other theories with potentially more or less relevance Memos are the vehicle by which concepts and ideas pour out, are saved and grow (Glaser 1998 p178) so they may be a line, a sentence, a paragraph or pages long. Any time the analyst has an idea it gets written down, it does not need to adhere to correct grammar or form but needs to be noted before it is lost. The theoretical memos form the basis of the final writing and that is when they are rewritten into an acceptable form for public viewing. 7
8 To enable sorting Glaser (1978 p87) advises having more than one copy of a memo so an original is always kept if the copy is cut up and reordered with another one (this applies to handwritten and computer memos); introducing the memo by a title or caption which is the category or property that the memo is about; highlighting the mention of the category or property in the memo; and, if more than one category or property are mentioned ensuring a discussion of the relationship is included in the memo and highlighted in some way. Saturation and sorting Glaser s (1978 p62) concept indicator model which is based on constant comparing of indicator to indicator, and then when a conceptual code is generated comparing the indicators to the emerging concept, results in a category becoming saturated. This is when new data does not add anything new to the category or its properties. Once a category is saturated the researcher does not need to keep coding incidents for that category as it does not develop the theory in any way (Glaser & Strauss 1967 p111). Ultimately by integrating the codes, identifying the core variable and then coding those incidents that relate to the core variable, the codes and categories reach a point where they explain the behaviour of the substantive group. All the way through this process the researcher has amassed a pile of memos. At some point the researcher begins sorting the pile, Glaser (1998) suggests entering the pile anywhere, working through the pile seeing how one memo compares with another. Just keep sorting, comparing and resorting and the integration of the theory emerges (Glaser 1998 pp ). Some memos are culled during this process for although they will all fit in some way they may not work or have sufficient relevance to the theory. These are three of the four criteria related to the quality of a grounded theory inquiry which will be discussed next. JUDGING THE QUALITY OF A GROUNDED THEORY INQUIRY The goal of a grounded theory inquiry is to explain the underlying social processes occurring within a substantive area. Glaser and Strauss (1967) established the criteria of fit, work, relevance for evaluating a grounded theory and assessing its integrity and later Glaser (1978; 1992) added modifiability to the list. Does it fit? Theoretical categories are developed from analysis of the data and must fit them. If a grounded theory is carefully induced from the substantive area its categories and their properties will fit the realities under study in the eyes of the subjects, practitioners and researchers in the area (Glaser 1992 p15). This means that a theorist cannot begin with preconceived concepts and impose the data onto those concepts. Does it work? The theory should explain, predict, and interpret what is happening in the substantive area in terms of the studied phenomena. If a grounded theory works it will explain the major variations in behavior in the area with respect to the processing of the main concerns of the subjects (Glaser 1992 p15). 8
9 Is it relevant? If it fits and works the grounded theory has achieved relevance (Glaser 1992 p15). This means that it will offer explanations of the problems or basic processes in the substantive area thereby having relevance. Is it modifiable? Because a grounded theory accounts for variation it is durable. If conditions change or further data is gathered the theory is flexible enough to take this into account without losing what has already been generated, that is it should be readily modifiable when new data present variations in emergent properties and categories. The theory is neither verified nor thrown out, it is modified to accommodate by integration [of] the new concepts (Glaser 1992 p15). This modifiability as new data emerges means that the theory continues to fit, work and be relevant as time passes and conditions change. When these four criteria are met the theory provides a conceptual approach to action and changes and accesses into the substantive area. In this sense it provides control because it fits in the real world, works in predictions and explanations, and is relevant to the people concerned (Glaser 1978; 1992). SUMMARY In this paper I have presented my arguments for the use of a Glaserian grounded theory approach as a suitable research methodology for this investigation of undergraduate tertiary students perceptions of the fairness of educational assessment. I wanted to understand what the main problem was for students in relation to assessment. After the initial three interviews with students I could see how complex and often emotive the topic was and how extremely different the perspectives were. I needed to find a methodology that would give me strategies to deal with this complexity. Grounded theory allowed me to develop a conceptual theory which explains what the core issue is for students and how they go about resolving that issue. I have described this method based on the work of Glaser and Strauss (1967) and Glaser (1978; 1992; 1998) and explained how it is that a grounded theory is judged. This paper supports the presentation where I address issues I faced when using grounded theory methodology for the first time. REFERENCES Berg, BL 1989, Qualitative Research Methods For The Social Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. Bogdan, RC & Biklen, SK 2003, Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods, 4th edn, Allyn and Bacon, Boston. 9
10 Charmaz, K 1994, 'The Grounded Theory Method: An Explication and Interpretation', in More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader, ed. BG Glaser, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, pp Charmaz, K 2003, 'Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods', in Strategies of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, eds. NK Denzin & YS Lincoln, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp Glaser, BG 1978, Theoretical Sensitivity, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG 1992, Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence vs Forcing, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG (ed.) 1993, Examples of Grounded Theory: A Reader, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG (ed.) 1994, More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG (ed.) 1996, Gerund Grounded Theory: The Basic Social Process Dissertation, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG 1998, Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG 1999, 'The Future of Grounded Theory', Qualitative Health Research, vol. 9, no. 6, 1999, pp Glaser, BG 2001, The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG 2002, 'Constructivist Grounded Theory?' Forum: Qualitative Social Research [on-line journal], vol. 3, no. 3, available at: [accessed 20 October Glaser, BG 2003, The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description's Remodeling of Grounded Theory Methodology, Sociology Press, Mill Valley. Glaser, BG & Strauss, AL 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine de Gruyter, New York. Greckhamer, T & Koro-Ljungberg, M 2005, 'The erosion of a method: examples from grounded theory', International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, vol. 18, no. 6, pp Locke, K 2001, Grounded Theory in Management Research, Sage Publications, London. 10
11 MacDonald, M 2001, 'Finding a Critical Perspective in Grounded Theory', in Using Grounded Theory in Nursing, eds. RS Schreiber & PN Stern, Springer, New York, pp Melia, KM 1996, 'Rediscovering Glaser', Qualitative Health Research, vol. 6, no. 3, pp Meltzer, BN, Petras, JW & Reynolds, LT 1975, Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, varieties and criticism, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London. Mertens, DM 1998, Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks. Minichiello, V, Aroni, R, Timewell, E & Alexander, L 1995, In-depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis, 2nd edn, Longman Cheshire, Melbourne. Stern, PN 1980, 'Grounded Theory Methodology', Image, vol. XII, no. 1. Stern, PN 1994a, 'Eroding Grounded Theory', in Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, ed. JM Morse, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp Stern, PN 1994b, 'Grounded Theory Methodology: Its Uses and Processes', in More Grounded Theory Methodology: A Reader, ed. B Glaser, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, pp Strauss, AL 1987, Qualitative analysis for social scientists, Cambridge University Press, New York. Strauss, A & Corbin, J 1998, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. Taylor, SJ & Bogdan, R 1998, Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource, 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York. 11
Grounded Theory s Contested Family of Methods: Historical and Contemporary Applications
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln DBER Speaker Series Discipline-Based Education Research Group 11-12-2015 Grounded Theory s Contested Family of Methods:
More informationCommentary on Constructing New Theory for Identifying Students with Emotional Disturbance
The Grounded Theory Review (2012), Volume 11, Issue 1 59 Commentary on Constructing New Theory for Identifying Students with Emotional Disturbance Cheri Ann Hernandez, University of Windsor Tom Andrews,
More informationA Reflection of Adopting Paillé s Data Analysis in Constructivist Grounded Theory Research
WWJMRD 2017; 3(7): 314-318 www.wwjmrd.com Impact Factor MJIF: 4.25 e-issn: 2454-6615 Associate Professor Binawan Institute of Health Sciences (STIKes Binawan) Jalan Kalibata,Jakarta, Indonesia A Reflection
More informationResearch made simple: What is grounded theory?
Research made simple: What is grounded theory? Noble, H., & Mitchell, G. (2016). Research made simple: What is grounded theory? Evidence-Based Nursing, 19(2), 34-35. DOI: 10.1136/eb-2016-102306 Published
More informationresearch could generate valid theories to explicate human behavior (Charmaz, 2006). Their
SHORT EXAMPLE In 1967, sociologists Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss created the qualitative methodology of grounded theory (GT) to challenge those in the scientific fields who believed only quantitative
More informationPrinciples of Sociology
Principles of Sociology DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS [Academic year 2017/18, FALL SEMESTER] Lecturer: Dimitris Lallas Principles of Sociology 4th Session Sociological
More informationSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Data analysis in qualitative research School of Nursing, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Unquestionably, data analysis is the most complex and mysterious of all of the
More informationUsing grounded theory to write qualitative findings with reflective journals
Using grounded theory to write qualitative findings with reflective journals Presentation to ESP 11/16/16 ESP Presentation 11/16/16 DR. LINDA S. BEHAR-HORENSTEIN DISTINGUISHED TEACHING SCHOLAR & PROFESSOR,
More informationQualitative Attitude Research To Determine the Employee Opinion of a Business Hotel in Istanbul - Turkey. Ahmet Ferda Seymen 1
Qualitative Attitude Research To Determine the Employee Opinion of a Business Hotel in Istanbul - Turkey Ahmet Ferda Seymen 1 INRTODUCTION Qualitative research is concerned with qualitative phenomenon,
More informationOutline. Introduction. Definition History Features
Outline Introduction Definition History Features When should Grounded Theory be used? Types of Grounded Theory Process of Grounded Theory Similarities and differences with other qualitative method Data
More informationDesign of Qualitative Research
Design of Qualitative Research Research questions appropriate for qualitative analysis. Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Approach Construct-related questions Nature of new constructs Typologies Mechanisms
More informationApplication of Grounded Theory in the Study of Land Registration Systems Usage
Application of Grounded Theory in the Study of Land Registration Systems Usage Lani Roux & Michael Barry Marrakech, Morocco, 18-22 May 2011 Outline Rationale / problem statement Different levels of theory
More informationThis version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link:
Citation: Breckenridge, Jenna, Jones, Derek, Elliott, Ian and Nicol, Margaret (2012) Choosing a methodological path: reflections on the constructivist turn. Grounded Theory Review, 11 (1). pp. 64-71. ISSN
More informationGrounded Theory. Abstract. Introduction. Cathy Urquhart. Manchester Metropolitan University. Biography
Grounded Theory Cathy Urquhart Manchester Metropolitan University c.urquhart@mmu.ac.uk Biography Cathy Urquhart is Professor of Digital and Sustainable Enterprise at Manchester Metropolitan University
More informationDiscovering Constructivist Grounded Theory s fit and relevance to researching contemporary mental health nursing practice
Discovering Constructivist Grounded Theory s fit and relevance to researching contemporary mental health nursing practice AUTHORS Andrew Gardner BN, MMHN, MBus, Dip Medical Hypnosis. Lecturer School of
More informationResearch Methodology in Social Sciences. by Dr. Rina Astini
Research Methodology in Social Sciences by Dr. Rina Astini Email : rina_astini@mercubuana.ac.id What is Research? Re ---------------- Search Re means (once more, afresh, anew) or (back; with return to
More informationLuhmann On-Line
Practical applications of Luhmann s work: Observations from a grounded theory perspective. by Barry Gibson, Department of Dental Public Health, Guy s King s and St Thomas Dental School, London. email barry.gibson@kcl.ac.uk
More informationAnswers to end of chapter questions
Answers to end of chapter questions Chapter 1 What are the three most important characteristics of QCA as a method of data analysis? QCA is (1) systematic, (2) flexible, and (3) it reduces data. What are
More informationReference: Harris, T. (2014) Grounded theory. Nursing Standard 29, 35, 37 43
Reference: Harris, T. (2014) Grounded theory. Nursing Standard 29, 35, 37 43 Grounded theory Abstract Grounded theory has become a popular research approach for researchers in health care and the social
More informationGrounded Theory Method!
Grounded Theory Method! Graham R Gibbs University of Huddersfield 1 Grounded theory method! focus on generating theoretical ideas (or hypotheses) from the data! rather than having these specified beforehand!
More informationGrounded theory in nursing research: Part 2 Critique
Grounded theory in nursing research: Part 2 Critique In the first article in this series (McCann and Clark 2003), the methodological characteristics of were examined. In this, the second article on grounded
More informationJustifying the use of a living theory methodology in the creation of your living educational theory. Responding to Cresswell.
Justifying the use of a living theory methodology in the creation of your living educational theory. Responding to Cresswell. Jack Whitehead, Department of Education, University of Bath DRAFT 23 September
More informationRon Chenail Nova Southeastern University. Penn State Hershey, College of Medicine May 8, 2013
Ron Chenail Nova Southeastern University Penn State Hershey, College of Medicine May 8, 2013 What is qualitative data analysis? How do I conduct qualitative data analysis and present results? Closest
More informationMarilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education
Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education ISSN: 2326-7070 (Print) ISSN: 2326-7062 (Online) Volume 8 Issue 1 (1990) Combined issue 8 & 9 (1989-1990) pps. 121-127 A Presentation of the Methodology
More informationFunnelling Used to describe a process of narrowing down of focus within a literature review. So, the writer begins with a broad discussion providing b
Accidental sampling A lesser-used term for convenience sampling. Action research An approach that challenges the traditional conception of the researcher as separate from the real world. It is associated
More informationTheorizing Interviews within Qualitative Research
Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review Vol. 18, 2013 Nishinomiya, Japan Theorizing Interviews within Qualitative Research Stuart CUNNINGHAM* Abstract The purpose of this paper is to explore the issue
More informationDoing High Quality Field Research. Kim Elsbach University of California, Davis
Doing High Quality Field Research Kim Elsbach University of California, Davis 1 1. What Does it Mean to do High Quality (Qualitative) Field Research? a) It plays to the strengths of the method for theory
More informationCanterbury Christ Church University s repository of research outputs.
Canterbury Christ Church University s repository of research outputs http://create.canterbury.ac.uk Please cite this publication as follows: Weed, M. E. (2016) Capturing the essence of grounded theory:
More informationChoose an approach for your research problem
Choose an approach for your research problem This course is about doing empirical research with experiments, so your general approach to research has already been chosen by your professor. It s important
More informationGlossary of Research Terms Compiled by Dr Emma Rowden and David Litting (UTS Library)
Glossary of Research Terms Compiled by Dr Emma Rowden and David Litting (UTS Library) Applied Research Applied research refers to the use of social science inquiry methods to solve concrete and practical
More informationIntroduction. Activities undertaken 13/10/2015. Qualitative Data Analysis. CSHG Hotel Management School of Galicia
Qualitative Data CSHG Hotel Management School of Galicia Features Activities Undertaken Strategies Analytical Aids Introduction Qualitative research is concerned with the production and analysis of texts
More informationCHAPTER 3. Methodology
CHAPTER 3 Methodology The purpose of this chapter is to provide the research methodology which was designed to achieve the objectives of this study. It is important to select appropriate method to ensure
More informationQualitative Data Analysis. Richard Boateng, PhD. Arguments with Qualitative Data. Office: UGBS RT18 (rooftop)
Qualitative Data Analysis Lecturer/Convenor: Richard Boateng, PhD. Email: richard@pearlrichards.org Office: UGBS RT18 (rooftop) Arguments with Qualitative Data Photo Illustrations from Getty Images www.gettyimages.com
More informationExaminer concern with the use of theory in PhD theses
Examiner concern with the use of theory in PhD theses (Presenter) Professor Allyson Holbrook Professor Sid Bourke Paper 2 - Symposium: The role of theory in doctoral education 15 th Biennial EARLI Conference
More informationPhilosophical Roots of Classical Grounded Theory: Its Foundations in Symbolic Interactionism
The Qualitative Report Volume 16 Number 4 Article 9 7-4-2011 Philosophical Roots of Classical Grounded Theory: Its Foundations in Symbolic Interactionism Khaldoun M. Aldiabat University of Northern British
More informationP H E N O M E N O L O G Y
P H E N O M E N O L O G Y In the literature, phenomenology is often contrasted with positivist inspired approaches in research. Positivism is associated with the idea of their being objective, independent
More informationCONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, EPISTEMOLOGY, PARADIGM, &THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, EPISTEMOLOGY, PARADIGM, &THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: Is the system of concepts, assumptions, expectations, beliefs, and theories that supports and informs your research.
More informationPsy2005: Applied Research Methods & Ethics in Psychology. Week 14: An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Psy2005: Applied Research Methods & Ethics in Psychology Week 14: An Introduction to Qualitative Research 1 Learning Outcomes Outline the General Principles of Qualitative Research Compare and contrast
More informationStyles of research in ergonomics 1
Styles of research in ergonomics 1 Sven Åke Hörte Halmstad University, Sweden and SMARTA/National Institute for Working Life (sven-ake.horte@set.hh.se) Abstract The paper develops a framework for classification
More informationResearch Methodologies
Research Methodologies Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods By Wylie J. D. Tidwell, III, Ph.D. www.linkedin.com/in/wylietidwell3 Consider... The research design is the blueprint that enables the
More informationTheory and Methods Question Bank
Theory and Methods Question Bank Theory and Methods is examined in both the AS and the A Level. The AS questions focus mostly on research methods and at A Level include sociological debates, perspectives
More informationMeasures of the Conditions of Objectivity, Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research: A Theoretical Analysis. Dr. Khalid Ahmed Mustafa Hagar
- - - - الملخص ١٣٢ Measures of the Conditions of Objectivity, Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research: A Theoretical Analysis By Abstract Dr. Khalid Ahmed Mustafa Hagar This article argues that
More information9699 SOCIOLOGY. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for Teachers.
CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Subsidiary Level and GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2014 series 9699 SOCIOLOGY 9699/23 Paper 2 (Theory and Methods), maximum raw mark
More informationThe Significance of Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems Research
Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) MWAIS 2016 Proceedings Midwest (MWAIS) Spring 5-19-2016 The Significance of Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems Research Osden
More informationCrossing boundaries between disciplines: A perspective on Basil Bernstein s legacy
Crossing boundaries between disciplines: A perspective on Basil Bernstein s legacy Ana M. Morais Department of Education & Centre for Educational Research School of Science University of Lisbon Revised
More informationCSC2130: Empirical Research Methods for Software Engineering
CSC2130: Empirical Research Methods for Software Engineering Steve Easterbrook sme@cs.toronto.edu www.cs.toronto.edu/~sme/csc2130/ 2004-5 Steve Easterbrook. This presentation is available free for non-commercial
More informationBenefits and constraints of qualitative and quantitative research methods in economics and management science
Benefits and constraints of qualitative and quantitative research methods in economics and management science It is often not an easy task, especially for budding researchers, to choose the optimal research
More informationGrounded Theory: A theoretical and practical application in the Australian Film Industry.
Grounded Theory: A theoretical and practical application in the Australian Film Industry. Michael Jones Ph.D Candidate, Dr. George Kriflik, and Associate Professor Michael Zanko. School of Management and
More informationCognitive domain: Comprehension Answer location: Elements of Empiricism Question type: MC
Chapter 2 1. Knowledge that is evaluative, value laden, and concerned with prescribing what ought to be is known as knowledge. *a. Normative b. Nonnormative c. Probabilistic d. Nonprobabilistic. 2. Most
More informationChapter 3 Tools for Practical Theorizing: Theoretical Maps and Ecosystem Maps
Chapter 3 Tools for Practical Theorizing: Theoretical Maps and Ecosystem Maps Chapter Outline I. Introduction A. Understanding theoretical languages requires universal translators 1. Theoretical maps identify
More informationDurkheim. Durkheim s fundamental task in Rules of the Sociological Method is to lay out
Michelle Lynn Tey Meadow Jane Jones Deirdre O Sullivan Durkheim Durkheim s fundamental task in Rules of the Sociological Method is to lay out the basic disciplinary structure of sociology. He begins by
More informationFORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG
FORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG Volume 3, No. 4, Art. 18 November 2002 Review: Nancy Shore Marlene de Laine (2000). Fieldwork, Participation and Practice: Ethics and Dilemmas in Qualitative
More informationCHAPTER 7 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TOOLS
CHAPTER 7 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TOOLS Dr. Werner R. Murhadi Qualitative business research is research that addresses business objectives through techniques that allow the researcher to provide elaborate
More informationYou must answer question 1.
Research Methods and Statistics Specialty Area Exam October 28, 2015 Part I: Statistics Committee: Richard Williams (Chair), Elizabeth McClintock, Sarah Mustillo You must answer question 1. 1. Suppose
More informationDEFINING THE CASE STUDY Yin, Ch. 1
Case Study Research DEFINING THE CASE STUDY Yin, Ch. 1 Goals for today are to understand: 1. What is a case study 2. When is it useful 3. Guidelines for designing a case study 4. Identifying key methodological
More informationEnhancing Qualitative Research Appraisal: Piloting a Tool to Support Methodological Congruence. Abstract
Enhancing Qualitative Research Appraisal: Piloting a Tool to Support Methodological Congruence Annette Willgens, Robin Cooper, Doles Jadotte, Cynthia Langtiw, Bruce Lilyea, Alice Obenchain-Leeson Abstract
More informationChanging the Graduate School Experience: Impacts on the Role Identity of Women
Changing the Graduate School Experience: Impacts on the Role Identity of Women Background and Purpose: Although the number of women earning Bachelor s degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematic
More informationGrounded Theory Evolution and Its Application in Health Informatics
Grounded Theory Evolution and Its Application in Health Informatics Elizabeth CUMMINGS a,1, Elizabeth M. BORYCKI b a ehealth Services Research Group, CIS, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia b School
More informationThe role of theory in construction management: a call for debate
The role of theory in construction management: a call for debate Seymour, D, Crook, D and Rooke, JA http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014461997373169 Title Authors Type URL The role of theory in construction management:
More informationCHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
The purpose of this chapter is to build your case as to why grounded theory is best methodology to inquire into your research purpose. It has a number of features to cover: 1. It needs to explain what
More informationAn Exploration of Key Issues in the Debate Between Classic and Constructivist Grounded Theory
An Exploration of Key Issues in the Debate Between Classic and Constructivist Grounded Theory Anne O Connor, National University of Galway, Ireland Barry Carpenter, University of Limerick, Ireland Barry
More informationVISUAL ANALYSIS AS A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CONCEPT
UNIVERSITY OF SPLIT PhD Anči Leburić, Full Professor PhD Maja Dadić Žeravica, Scientific Associate Split, 18 th March, 2018. VISUAL ANALYSIS AS A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CONCEPT Challenges of research application
More informationWhat is analytical sociology? And is it the future of sociology?
What is analytical sociology? And is it the future of sociology? Twan Huijsmans Sociology Abstract During the last few decades a new approach in sociology has been developed, analytical sociology (AS).
More informationMETHODOLOGY FOR DISSERTATION
METHODOLOGY FOR DISSERTATION In order to expose the methods of scientific work, it is necessary to briefly clarify the terms of methodology, methods and scientific methods. The methodology comes from the
More informationPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Psychology of Sport and Exercise 11 (2010) 414e418 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Psychology of Sport and Exercise journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychsport A quality debate on grounded
More informationCompare and Contrast of Grounded Theory and KJ Method
Compare and Contrast of Grounded Theory and KJ Method Kenichi Shimura Introduction The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast grounded theory and KJ (Kawakita method. Many Japanese researchers
More informationFORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG
FORUM: QUALITATIVE SOCIAL RESEARCH SOZIALFORSCHUNG Volume 5, No. 1, Art. 27 January 2004 Review: Mechthild Kiegelmann Melanie Mauthner, Maxine Birch, Julie Jessop & Tina Miller (Eds.) (2002). Ethics in
More informationModels of Information Retrieval
Models of Information Retrieval Introduction By information behaviour is meant those activities a person may engage in when identifying their own needs for information, searching for such information in
More informationQualitative research. An introduction. Characteristics. Characteristics. Characteristics. Qualitative methods. History
Qualitative research An introduction International module University College Lillebaelt 1 Characteristics The source of well-grounded theory, illustrated with rich description and explanations of processes
More informationAuthor's response to reviews
Author's response to reviews Title: Physiotherapy interventions in scientific physiotherapy publications focusing on interventions for children with cerebral palsy: A qualitative phenomenographic approach.
More informationQualitative Research Design
Qualitative Research Design Jie Hu, PhD., RN, FAAN NUR705-01D What is qualitative research? Research focusing on how individuals and groups view and understand the world and construct meanings out of their
More informationadequacy of a theory cannot be divorced from the process by which it is generated.
CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN 3.1 Introduction Chapter 2 discussed the philosophical underpinnings of IS research. These will be used to guide the research in picking an appropriate research
More informationAssignment 4: True or Quasi-Experiment
Assignment 4: True or Quasi-Experiment Objectives: After completing this assignment, you will be able to Evaluate when you must use an experiment to answer a research question Develop statistical hypotheses
More informationMARK SCHEME for the May/June 2011 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9699 SOCIOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Subsidiary Level and GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2011 question paper for the guidance of teachers 9699 SOCIOLOGY 9699/23
More informationVariation in Theory Use in Qualitative Research
64 Preliminary Considerations QUALITATIVE THEORY USE Variation in Theory Use in Qualitative Research Qualitative inquirers use theory in their studies in several ways. First, much like in quantitative
More informationPARADIGMS, THEORY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH
PARADIGMS, THEORY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Workshop 3 Masaryk University Faculty of Social Studies Research methods in sociology 5.3.2006 Nina Tomov 1 1. Introduction This chapter explains some specific ways
More informationHOW TO IDENTIFY A RESEARCH QUESTION? How to Extract a Question from a Topic that Interests You?
Stefan Götze, M.A., M.Sc. LMU HOW TO IDENTIFY A RESEARCH QUESTION? I How to Extract a Question from a Topic that Interests You? I assume you currently have only a vague notion about the content of your
More informationResearch Prospectus. Your major writing assignment for the quarter is to prepare a twelve-page research prospectus.
Department of Political Science UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Philip G. Roeder Research Prospectus Your major writing assignment for the quarter is to prepare a twelve-page research prospectus. A
More informationInstructor s Test Bank. Social Research Methods
TEST BANK Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches 7th Edition WLawrence Neuman Instant download and all chapters Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
More informationTheoretical Perspectives in the PhD thesis: How many? Dr. Terence Love We-B Centre School of Management Information Systems Edith Cowan University
Theoretical Perspectives in the PhD thesis: How many? Dr. Terence Love We-B Centre School of Management Information Systems Edith Cowan University Content and purpose of the PhD thesis A candidate s PhD
More informationDEFINITIVE COURSE RECORD
Course Title Awarding Bodies BSc (Hons) Psychology and Criminology University of Suffolk Level of Award 1 FHEQ Level 6 Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies Recognition Credit Structure 2 Mode
More informationStephen Madigan PhD madigan.ca Vancouver School for Narrative Therapy
Stephen Madigan PhD www.stephen madigan.ca Vancouver School for Narrative Therapy Re-authoring Conversations Psychologist Jerome Bruner 1 (1989) suggests that within our selection of stories expressed,
More informationpositivist phenomenological
Introduction to Qualitative Research RCS 6740 7/26/04 According to Taylor and Bogdan (1984), two major theoretical perspectives underlie much of social science research. They are: a. the positivist tradition,
More informationINTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 1. THE HUMANISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTERVIEWER SKILLS
INTERVIEWS II: THEORIES AND TECHNIQUES 1. THE HUMANISTIC FRAMEWORK FOR INTERVIEWER SKILLS 1.1. Foundation of the Humanistic Framework Research interviews have been portrayed in a variety of different ways,
More informationChapter 1 Social Science and Its Methods
Chapter 1 Social Science and Its Methods MULTIPLE CHOICE 1) Scientific knowledge is knowledge that has been: A) systematically gathered, classified, related, and interpreted. B) rediscovered and cherished
More informationSci.Int.(Lahore),28(2), ,2016 ISSN ; CODEN: SINTE
Sci.Int.(Lahore),28(2),1497-1501,2016 ISSN 1013-5316; CODEN: SINTE 8 1497 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES OF RESEARCH: A SYNOPSIS OF REQUIRED COMPETENCIES FOR CURRICULUM DEVELOPERS Syeda Lubna
More informationIdeas RESEARCH. Theory, Design Practice. Turning INTO. Barbara Fawcett. Rosalie Pockett
Turning Ideas INTO RESEARCH & Theory, Design Practice Barbara Fawcett Rosalie Pockett 00_Fawcett_BAB1410B0218_Prelims.indd 3 3/23/2015 6:32:36 PM ONE Why do research? In this chapter we look at the many
More informationEntering the Field: Decisions of an Early Career Researcher. Adopting Classic Grounded Theory
Entering the Field: Decisions of an Early Career Researcher Adopting Classic Grounded Theory Sajeel Ahmed, University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom Markus Haag, University of Bedfordshire, United Kingdom
More informationINTRODUCTION TO QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Dr. Rabiatul-Adawiah bt Ahmad Rashid School of Educational Studies
INTRODUCTION TO QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Dr. Rabiatul-Adawiah bt Ahmad Rashid School of Educational Studies An Outline Research Paradigms Differences between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Design Qualitative
More informationA to Z OF RESEARCH METHODS AND TERMS APPLICABLE WITHIN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH
A to Z OF RESEARCH METHODS AND TERMS APPLICABLE WITHIN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH QUANTATIVE RESEARCH METHODS Are concerned with trying to quantify things; they ask questions such as how long, how many or
More informationTheory Program Transcript
Theory Program Transcript [MUSIC] NARRATOR: What is theory and how does theory relate to the various methods of research design? In this video program, Dr. Michael Patton explores the answers to these
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION. you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give. is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and the measure you give will be the measure you get. 3 Why do you see the speck that
More informationAnalysing Semi-Structured Interviews: Understanding Family Experience of Rare Disease and Genetic Risk
Analysing Semi-Structured Interviews: Understanding Family 2015 SAGE Publications, Ltd.. All Rights Reserved. This PDF has been generated from. Analysing Semi-Structured Interviews: Understanding Family
More information- Triangulation - Member checks - Peer review - Researcher identity statement
Module 3 Dr. Maxwell Reema Alsweel EDRS 797 November 13, 2009 Matrix Potential validity threat Looking for answers Leading Overlooking important data that does not seem to fit Asking the right questions
More informationIN EXPECTATION OF THE THEORY: GROUNDED THEORY METHOD
Received: 28.03.2014. Reviewed paper UDK: 303.43.022 IN EXPECTATION OF THE THEORY: GROUNDED THEORY METHOD Danijel Baturina Katedra za socijalnu politiku, Pravni fakultet Zagreb danijel.baturina@pravo.hr
More informationUnit Options and Core Texts
Unit Options and s BSc Psychology, Counselling and Therapies (Full-Time) All units are core Year 1 Foundations to Psychology Introduction to Psychological Research and Data Analysis Psychology in Everyday
More informationHandbook Of Qualitative Research Methods For Psychology And The Social Sciences Pdf
Handbook Of Qualitative Research Methods For Psychology And The Social Sciences Pdf health sciences and psychology are now rediscover- ing their roots in qualitative Historical Overview of Qualitative
More informationTypes of Research (Quantitative and Qualitative)
Types of Research (Quantitative and Qualitative) RCS 6740 5/12/04 Observing Behavior Behavior in research can be observed or measured. Because behavior varies so much, it is critical that scientists have
More informationRunning head: Investigating the merit of discreetness in health care services targeting young men. Edvard K.N. Karlsen
1 Running head: Investigating the merit of discreetness in health care services targeting young men Edvard K.N. Karlsen 2 Investigating the merit of discreetness in health care services targeting young
More information