Tilburg University. Universality of the five-factor model of personality Fedvadjiev, Velichko; van de Vijver, Fons
|
|
- Adrian Haynes
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Tilburg University Universality of the five-factor model of personality Fedvadjiev, Velichko; van de Vijver, Fons Published in: International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences Document version: Early version, also known as pre-print Publication date: 2015 Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. - Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research - You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain - You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 19. aug. 2018
2 1 Universality of the Five-Factor Model of Personality Velichko H. Fetvadjiev University of Pretoria, South Africa Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University, The Netherlands, North-West University, South Africa, and University of Queensland, Australia Published as: Fetvadjiev, V., & Van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Universality of the fivefactor model of personality. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (2 nd ed., Vol 9, pp ). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. Author Note Velichko H. Fetvadjiev Department of Human Resource Management, University of Pretoria. Until 2014, Velichko H. Fetvadjiev was publishing by the family name of Valchev. Fons J. R. van de Vijver Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg University, The Netherlands. North-West University, South Africa, and University of Queensland, Australia.
3 2 Abstract The Five-Factor Model (FFM) is a language-based model of the structure of personality. Evidence from 3 lines of research on the FFM s universality across cultures is reviewed: (a) questionnaire studies that sought to replicate the FFM across cultures; (b) psycholexical studies that examined implicit models of personality in different languages using lexica; (c) indigenous and emic etic studies that examined personality structures in specific cultures using a variety of methods, and subsequently assessed the overlap between these models and the FFM. Support for the universality of the FFM is strongest when FFM-based questionnaires are used and tends to be stronger in Western than in non-western cultures. Four factors are usually well replicated (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness), whereas the fifth factor, Openness, is not always found. From a psycholexical perspective, the replicability of 3 broad dimensions is best established: Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Emic etic studies tend to converge on a structure similar to the FFM although sometimes expanding it in the domain of socialrelational functioning. The non-replication of the FFM cannot be easily attributed to a common pattern of causes; data quality, availability of abstract terms in the language, and cultural salience of the concepts are often involved. Keywords: personality, Big Five, FFM, culture, universality, country profiles, psycholexical study, indigenous psychology, emic etic approach, cross-cultural psychology, cultural psychology
4 3 The Five-Factor Model (FFM) of personality is a model of the structure of personality firmly based in language, according to which human personality can be described using five broad dimensions: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness. Each of these dimensions subsumes a number of lower level traits on both the positive and the negative pole: for example, talkative and reserved in Extraversion, friendly and harsh in Agreeableness, orderly and messy in Conscientiousness, calm and fearful in Neuroticism, and perceptive and ignorant in Openness (Goldberg, 1990). The terms Five-Factor Model and Big Five are often used interchangeably, although in the narrow sense, the former refers to a stricter version of the model with 30 definite lower level facets (Costa & McCrae, 1992), whereas the latter encompasses a broader array of models with different lower level components; we follow the habit of using the two terms as synonymous. The FFM was initially developed to provide a parsimonious account of variation in personality descriptions in the English language. The FFM dates back to work by Allport and Odbert (1936) and Stagner (1937) in the 1930s, revived in the 1960s by Norman (1963) and Tupes and Christal (1961), and widely established in the last decades of the 20 th century by various researchers, notably Goldberg (1990) and McCrae and Costa (1997). This renewed interest spurred cross-cultural studies of the FFM, turning the attention toward the cross-cultural replicability of the model. If the FFM were found to replicate across cultures and languages, this would provide support for its validity as a panhuman model of personality and would allow it to be used as a basis for theorizing and empirical research transcending cultural and regional boundaries. In parallel developments, research on animal personality has identified personality components that could be interpreted in terms of (subsets of) the
5 4 FFM in animals, whereby most overlap was found in humans closest relatives, chimpanzees (Gosling & John, 1999). To what extent is there a single, species-wide model of personality in humans? The positions taken on this question vary. Historically, the discussion goes back to the emic etic distinction, introduced by Pike (1967). Etic refers to research that studies cross-cultural differences from a comparative perspective (studying each individual culture less profoundly), whereas emic refers to research that examines a specific culture in more detail with no (or only a secondary) cross-cultural focus. An etic, universalistic perspective in personality can be found in five-factor theory (McCrae & Costa, 2008), where the dimensions of personality are assumed to be biologically based and universal, whereas specific manifestations of the model s components are shaped by culture. From a more relativistic perspective, personality can only be understood in cultural and historical context (Piekkola, 2011). There are methodological approaches, such as the psycholexical approach (discussed in a following section), which have no a priori position on the universality of the FFM or other models, but provide important tools for addressing the topic. Finally, there are theoretical and methodological approaches, labeled emic etic (Cheung, Van de Vijver, & Leong, 2011), that seek to combine universalistic and relativistic approaches. Emic etic approaches seek to integrate evidence on more universal and more culture-specific elements in personality models. We review the empirical evidence on the FFM accumulated from three lines of research: (a) questionnaire studies that sought to replicate the FFM across cultures; (b) psycholexical studies that sought to establish implicit models of personality in different languages using lexica; (c) indigenous and emic etic studies that sought to establish personality structures in specific cultures using a variety of methods, and
6 5 subsequently assessed the overlap between these models and the FFM. In the first two sections, we start from the evidence in support of FFM universality and progress toward divergent evidence, while also commenting on methodological limitations and shortcomings. In the final section, we present findings on indigenous concepts and their degree of overlap with the FFM in several non-western cultures. Questionnaire Studies In the questionnaire study design, participants respond to a list of questions about their typical characteristics, behaviors, feelings, and thoughts. Items include abstract trait terms (e.g., I am talkative ) as well as behavioral terms (e.g., I make friends easily ). Responses are factor-analyzed, and the resulting structure is compared with an existing factor structure, typically derived from U.S. data. Statistical criteria are used to evaluate agreement by using congruence coefficients that indicate the degree of equivalence between the two structures (interpreted as supportive evidence for the identity of factors across the cultures studied). Congruence coefficients of.95 and higher indicate equivalent structures (Lorenzo- Seva & Ten Berge, 2006; Van de Vijver & Leung, 1997), although values of.85 or higher are sometimes also taken as evidence of similarity. A similar procedure can be used to compare individual-level to country-level factor structures. The most popular inventory for measuring the FFM is the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992), which measures 5 broad domains and 30 lower level facets, 6 per domain (i.e., the FFM in the narrow sense, mentioned in the Introduction). Another popular instrument is the Big Five Inventory (BFI; John, Donahue, & Kentle, 1991). Both instruments have been translated into a large number of languages from different families, using back-translation procedures. The self-report form of the NEO-PI-R has been administered in 36 cultures (McCrae,
7 6 2002), and the peer-report in 50 cultures (McCrae, Terracciano, & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project, 2005a). The BFI has been administered in 56 cultures (Schmitt, Allik, McCrae, Benet-Martínez, et al., 2007). All these studies tended to find fair to very good replicability of the factors of the FFM in individual cultures and for the total set of cultures compared with the U.S. structure. The general replicability between the individual- and culture-level factor structure, together with evidence for the external validity of culture-level scores (e.g., their associations with cultural values and economic indices), has enabled researchers to construct personality profiles of cultures (McCrae, Terracciano, & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project, 2005b) and to explore the geographical distribution of Big Five traits (Schmitt et al., 2007). For example, Schmitt et al. (2007) found that average levels of Extraversion were lower in East Asia than in other regions. Finally, broad support for the replicability of the FFM has also been found in studies with less extensive culture coverage, both using other instruments designed to measure the FFM (Caprara, Barbaranelli, Bermúdez, Maslach, & Ruch, 2000; De Fruyt et al., 2009; Hendriks et al., 2003) and using instruments that had not been initially devised as a measure of the FFM, including nonverbal instruments (Paunonen et al., 1996). Several limitations on the support for the universality of the FFM from questionnaire studies require attention. First, although the five factors generally tend to replicate, not all replications pass accepted thresholds for construct equivalence (Lorenzo-Seva & Ten Berge, 2006; Van de Vijver & Leung, 1997). More discrepancies tend to be found at lower levels of aggregation (i.e., for individual countries and country regions) than for global solutions. In McCrae et al. (2005a), there were a number of non-western, especially African, countries with congruence
8 7 coefficients below.80, especially for Openness. The authors attributed the finding to shortcomings in data quality rather than insufficiency of the model for these countries. In Schmitt et al. (2007), several coefficients especially in Africa and South and Southeast Asia were below.90, with the lowest one of.84 for Openness in Africa. Second, although the culture-level five factors map fairly closely on the individuallevel factors, the two structures are not identical. On culture level, Extraversion was co-defined by a number of facets from other factors (McCrae et al., 2005b), and the correlations between the NEO-PI-R and BFI factors were less supportive of the convergent and discriminant validity of the factors than on individual level (Schmitt et al., 2007). The implication is that interpretations of individual differences cannot be transferred simply to interpretations of country mean differences. Third, although the structural equivalence of the five factors on individual level has broadly been established, there is no comparable support for measurement equivalence and there is some evidence for inequivalence (Church et al., 2011). The implication is that direct numerical comparisons of trait scores across cultures are not yet warranted: Individual differences in the five factors do not have the same meaning across countries. Fourth, the questionnaire study design has the inherent limitation that it can only be used in a straightforward manner in literate populations. Most of the studies have been conducted on student samples. In one of the rare studies on preliterate societies, Gurven, Von Rueden, Massenkoff, Kaplan, and Lero Vie (2013) failed to replicate the FFM using the BFI. The authors interpreted their finding as evidence that the FFM may not be applicable to the Tsimane ethnic group in the Bolivian Amazon and likely other small-scale, preliterate societies; a more conservative interpretation would involve issues of method bias and inadequacy of questionnaire adaptation. Finally, an inherent limitation of questionnaires is that they tend to impose structure on the data
9 8 to a certain extent (Church, 2000). Support of cross-cultural replicability has been obtained also for other models, measured with respective questionnaires, such as the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ, Barrett, Petrides, Eysenck, Eysenck, 1998). While questionnaires offer a powerful tool for replicating factor structures, they are less efficient as tools for discovering factors implicit in different cultures and languages. Such questionnaires cannot address the question whether the items are the best possible rendering of personality in that culture and whether culture-specific aspects were not left out. Psycholexical Studies Research in the psycholexical (or lexical) tradition is based on the assumption that the most important features of personality become encoded as single terms in language ( psycholexical hypothesis ; Goldberg, 1981). Single personalitydescriptive terms can be derived from lexica and subsequently reduced through content and factor analysis to arrive at a few broad dimensions of personality. A lexical study begins with an exhaustive extraction of personality terms from current dictionaries. In the stricter and more common version of the approach, only terms referring to internal psychological characteristics are selected, whereas terms that are purely evaluative, refer to physical appearance, beliefs, temporary states, or do not describe personality are excluded (Saucier, 2008). The list is further shortened by selecting the terms that appear most frequently in natural language usage. Participants are presented with the selected trait list and asked to assess to what extent each term is applicable to them (or to a target person they know well). The scores of the participants are factor-analyzed, resulting in models with a few dimensions that account for the covariation of trait terms. Because of the comprehensive selection of trait terms, this approach is less restrictive than the questionnaire approach in the
10 9 dimensions it can identify and is thought to be more representative of the implicit structure of personality in each language. The Big Five model was first identified in the outcomes of lexical research in English (Goldberg, 1990). Lexical studies have since been conducted in about fifteen other, Indo-European as well as non-indo-european languages. Direct empirical comparisons and conceptual overviews of the lexical data across languages have not converged on a single model replicable across languages (De Raad et al., 2010; Saucier, 2009). Although factors similar to those of the Big Five have been identified across languages, the Big Five as a coherent structure defined by common elements has only been replicated in the Germanic languages (Saucier & Goldberg, 2001). In an analysis on data from 12 languages obtained according to the common premises (e.g., full rather than random extraction of terms, exclusion of purely evaluative terms), with explicit definition of common terms defining factors, and direct psychometric assessment of structure equivalence (with a liberal cutoff value for congruence coefficients at.80), De Raad and colleagues (2010) found that only three factors were fully replicable across languages: Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. These factors were more broadly defined than the corresponding Big Five factors because they included terms from the other factors. These three factors tend to be the three largest factors in lexical studies. There is less agreement across languages on factors beyond these three. Some limitations of the psycholexical approach are effected from the opposing aims of arriving at a common model for implicit personality concepts across languages while providing a comprehensive representation of these concepts. The first aim drives research toward the identification of fewer personality factors, whereas the second drives research toward more factors (De Raad et al., 2010). Comparability of
11 10 factors across languages is challenged by procedural differences between studies with respect to the selection of data sets and of terms to be analyzed, item translation, and decisions regarding factor extraction and rotation. In addition, there is the more important limitation that different sets of items provide the input for the analyses in different languages. The factors are usually defined by a limited number of highly loading items, called markers. These markers tend not to overlap across languages, and decisions have to be made as to which markers to use for factor identification and subsequent comparisons. These decisions can be biased by prior expectations, for example, of retrieving the Big Five factors. A classic example is that of Assertiveness terms. In the English Big Five structure, Assertiveness is a facet of the first factor, Extraversion. When, in other languages, Emotional Stability fails to emerge as a fourth factor, Assertiveness terms loading on the fourth factor can be taken to indicate Emotional Stability because this is the expected factor. Such interpretations amount to circular reasoning in assuming what has to be shown (De Raad & Peabody, 2005). A different set of limitations apply to the conceptual premises of the psycholexical approach. Although it is reasonable to expect that trait terms are used universally, it has not been established that they are equally frequent across languages and perceived as equally informative of personality across cultures. There is evidence that abstract trait terms are used more often in personality descriptions in Western groups, whereas specific behavioral descriptions are more preferred in non-western groups (Del Prado et al., 2007; Valchev, Van de Vijver, Nel, Rothmann, & Meiring, 2013). It may also be the case that some personality domains are less saturated with single abstract trait terms, which could explain the weak replicability of the smaller factors, Neuroticism and Openness, in lexical studies as opposed to questionnaire studies. In more practical terms, the psycholexical approach is not applicable to
12 11 languages where there are wide variations between a common written language and spoken dialects, as in Arabic, and to languages that have no developed lexicography. Indigenous and Emic Etic Studies In contrast to the etic studies that seek to replicate personality structure across cultures, such as the NEO-PI-R replicability studies, indigenous or emic studies focus on the identification of personality concepts perceived as relevant in specific, typically non-western cultures. Emic studies employ an array of methods including psycholexical methods, ethnographic interviews, and reviews of folklore and literature for personality characteristics. The strength of this kind of research is in the comprehensive representation of the implicit personality models, not bound by questionnaire item selections or exclusive reliance on lexical records. There is some work on individual, purely indigenous (emic) personality concepts, such as the East-Asian, religion-based selfless self (Ho, 1995) and the Japanese Amae (Doi, 1973). However, this work has never developed into fullfledged personality models. When the personality concepts derived in indigenous research are compared with those from other cultures or with supposed universal models, more confident conclusions on the generalizability and universality of personality concepts can be drawn. Some of the major findings from indigenous research in different parts of the world are presented below. In the Philippines, indigenous research has identified a number of implicit personality dimensions represented in different models (Guanzon-Lapeña, Church, Carlota, Katigbak, 1998). Katigbak and colleagues (Katigbak, Church, & Akamine, 1996; Katigbak, Church, Guanzon-Lapeña, Carlota, & Del Pilar, 2002) examined the indigenous dimensions jointly with the FFM and found that most indigenous concepts could be subsumed in the FFM. There were only a few concepts that were not
13 12 empirically encompassed by the FFM, such as social curiosity, risk-taking, and religiosity (Katigbak et al., 2002). Importantly, the indigenous concepts offered only modest incremental criterion validity above the FFM. In Mexico, Ortiz et al. (2007) reviewed previous literature on indigenous concepts and examined the relations of a large number of indigenous measures with the FFM. They found that most of the Mexican concepts could be well subsumed within the FFM. Concepts of warmth and affection appeared to be more salient in the indigenous measures, whereas Openness could not be identified in the indigenous measures but only in the imported FFM measures. Overall, both in the Philippines and in Mexico, researchers were led to conclude that cultural differences may not be expressed in the clear identification of dimensions beyond the Big Five, but rather in the salience and composition of elements that can all be subsumed in the Big Five. In China, several independent lines of research have explored the indigenous structure of personality (reviewed in Yang, 2006). The best established questionnaire that resulted from one of these lines of research is the Cross-Cultural (initially Chinese) Personality Assessment Inventory (CPAI-2, Cheung, Cheung, Leung, Ward, & Leong, 2003). Developed with input from interviews and reviews of wide-ranging literature sources, this inventory identified one dimension that could not be subsumed within the FFM, Interpersonal Relatedness, which involves aspects of functioning in social context and adherence to tradition. Subsequent studies have replicated the Interpersonal Relatedness factor in non-chinese populations, including the U.S. (Lin, & Church, 2004), suggesting that although Interpersonal Relatedness is most salient in China, it is not unique to China but is recognizable in other cultures. Openness, on the other hand, has not been identified in China using indigenous measures but only using imported measures (Cheung et al., 2008). So, although single concepts referring
14 13 to Openness are used in the Chinese context, they are not implicitly recognized as constituting a coherent personality dimension. This pattern is opposite to that of Interpersonal Relatedness. Finally, it is noteworthy that the Interpersonal Relatedness dimension has been found to offer incremental validity in the prediction of culturally relevant outcomes in China (Zhang & Bond, 1998). In South Africa, a culturally heterogeneous country with 11 official languages, recent indigenous research has identified nine clusters of personality concepts derived from free personality descriptions (Nel et al., 2012). All of the Big Five factors were recognizable within the nine clusters, but the nine clusters included a large number of concepts dealing with interpersonal relations. This finding is consistent with findings from lexical and other indigenous studies, where Agreeableness-related terms normally form the largest factor. The quantitative validation of the conceptual model is currently ongoing, but there are some initial indications that concepts related to social-relational functioning in a fairly norm-regulated context are salient in South Africa, yet not well covered by the FFM. Conclusion Support for the universality of the FFM is strongest when FFM-based questionnaires are used and tends to be stronger in Western than in non-western cultures. Four out of the five factors are usually well replicated (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness), whereas the fifth factor, Openness, is not always found. From a psycholexical perspective, the replicability of three broad implicit dimensions is best established: Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. The non-replication of the FFM cannot be easily attributed to a common pattern of causes; data quality, availability of abstract terms in the language, and cultural salience of the concepts are often involved. Despite some strong
15 14 proposals (e.g., Buss, 1991; McCrae & Costa, 2008), there is no commonly accepted theory of the Big Five or FFM that would account for the universal occurrence of the five factors or their causal role in behavior. In fact, the role of the Big Five factors as causal entities is periodically challenged (e.g., Cramer et al., 2012). The lack of such a commonly accepted theory can be perceived as contributing to the dangers of circular reasoning (De Raad & Peabody, 2005). Nonetheless, research on the universality of the FFM has produced invaluable data and rich insights in the patterns of similarities and differences in personality across cultures.
16 15 References Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47, 1 171, No Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, doi: /s (98) Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, doi: /annurev.ps Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Bermúdez, J., Maslach, C., & Ruch, W. (2000). Multivariate methods for the comparison of factor structures in cross-cultural research: An illustration with the Big Five Questionnaire. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 31. doi: / Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 34, doi: / Cheung, F. M., Cheung, S. F., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Yeh, K.-H. (2008). Relevance of Openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, doi: / Cheung, F. M., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the assessment of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66, doi: /a
17 16 Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, doi: / Church, A. T., Alvarez, J. M., Mai, N. T. Q., French, B. F., Katigbak, M. S., & Ortiz, F. A. (2011). Are cross-cultural comparisons of personality profiles meaningful? Differential item and facet functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, doi: /a Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO- PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Cramer, A. O. J., Van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., Kendler, K. S., Borsboom, D. (2012). Dimensions of normal personality as networks in search of equilibrium: You can t like parties if you don t like people. European Journal of Personality, 26, doi: /per.1866 De Fruyt, F., De Bolle, M., McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Collaborators of the Adolescent Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2009). Assessing the universal structure of personality in early adolescence. Assessment, 16, doi: / De Raad, B., Barelds, D. P. H., Levert, E., Ostendorf, F., Mlačić, B., Di Blas, L.,... Katigbak, M. S. (2010). Only three factors of personality description are fully replicable across languages: A comparison of 14 trait taxonomies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, doi: /a
18 17 De Raad, B., & Peabody, D. (2005). Cross-culturally recurrent personality factors: Analyses of three factors. European Journal of Personality, 19, doi: /per.550 Del Prado, A. M., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Miramontes, L. G., Whitty, M. T., Curtis, G. J.,... Reyes, J. A. S. (2007). Culture, method, and the content of self-concepts: Testing trait, individual-self-primacy, and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, doi: /j.jrp Doi, T. L. (1973). The anatomy of dependence. Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha International. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, doi: / Gosling, S. D., & John, O. P. (1999). Personality dimensions in nonhuman animals: A cross-species review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, doi: / Gurven, M., Von Rueden, C., Massenkoff, M., Kaplan, H., & Lero Vie, M. (2013). How universal is the Big Five? Testing the Five-Factor Model of personality variation among forager farmers in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, doi: /a Hendriks, A. A. J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J. A., De Fruyt, F.,... Ruisel, I. (2003). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Cross-
19 18 cultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, doi: /per.491 Ho, D. Y. (1995). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, doi: /j tb00269.x John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory - Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, doi: / McCrae, R. R. (2002). NEO-PI-R data from 36 cultures: Further intercultural comparisons. In R. R. McCrae, & J. Allik (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp ). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, doi: / x McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp ). New York, NY: Guilford Press. McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 78 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005a). Universal features of personality traits from the observer s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, doi: /
20 19 McCrae, R. R., Terracciano, A., & 79 Members of the Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. (2005b). Personality profiles of cultures: Aggregate personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, doi: / Nel, J. A., Valchev, V. H., Rothmann, S., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Meiring, D., & De Bruin, G. P. (2012). Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa. Journal of Personality, 80, doi: /j x Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, doi: /h Ortiz, F. A., Church, A. T., Vargas-Flores, J. J., Ibáñez-Reyes, J., Flores-Galaz, M., Iuit-Briceño, J. I., & Escamilla, J. M. (2007). Are indigenous personality dimensions culture-specific? Mexican inventories and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, doi: /j.jrp Paunonen, S. V., Keinonen, M., Trzebinski, J., Forsterling, F., Grishenkoroze, N., Kouznetsova, L., & Chan, D. W. (1996). The structure of personality in six cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, doi: / Piekkola, B. (2011). Traits across cultures: A neo-allportian perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31, doi: /a Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of structure of human behavior (2nd ed.). The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
21 20 Saucier, G. (2008). Measures of the personality factors found recurrently in human lexicons. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment (Vol. 2, pp ). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE. Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69, doi: / Schmitt, D. P., Allik, J., McCrae, R. R., Benet-Martínez, V., et al. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, doi: / Stagner, R. (1937). Psychology of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. (USAF Tech. Rep. No ). San Antonio, TX: Lackland Air Force Base. Valchev, V. H., Van de Vijver, F. J. R., Nel, J. A., Rothmann, S., & Meiring, D. (2013). The use of traits and contextual information in free personality descriptions across ethnocultural groups in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, doi: /a Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for crosscultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Yang, K.-S. (2006). Indigenous personality research: The Chinese case. In U. Kim, K.-S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Ed.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp ). New York, NY: Springer.
22 21 Zhang, J., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Personality and filial piety among college students in two Chinese societies: The added value of indigenous constructs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, doi: /
23 22 Cross-References Cross-Cultural Psychology, Cross-Cultural Research Methods, Cultural Psychology, Cultural Relativism, Anthropology of, Indigenous Psychology, Five Factor Model of Personality, Assessment of, Five Factor Model of Personality, Facets of, Theories of the Big Five Factor Model, 25066
Running Head: SOUTH AFRICAN PERSONALITY INVENTORY 1. The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A Culture-Informed
Running Head: SOUTH AFRICAN PERSONALITY INVENTORY 1 The South African Personality Inventory (SAPI): A Culture-Informed Instrument for the Country s Main Ethnocultural Groups Velichko H. Fetvadjiev University
More informationEscapable Conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the Universality of Trait Structure
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology In the public domain 2004, Vol. 87, No. 2, 261 265 DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.261 Escapable Conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the Universality of Trait Structure
More informationMultiple Act criterion:
Common Features of Trait Theories Generality and Stability of Traits: Trait theorists all use consistencies in an individual s behavior and explain why persons respond in different ways to the same stimulus
More informationSOCIAL-RELATIONAL CONCEPTS 1. and Cross-Cultural Perspective. Velichko H. Valchev. Fons J. R. van de Vijver. Deon Meiring. J. Alewyn Nel.
SOCIAL-RELATIONAL CONCEPTS 1 Beyond Agreeableness: Social-Relational Personality Concepts from an Indigenous and Cross-Cultural Perspective Velichko H. Valchev Tilburg University, The Netherlands, and
More informationWork Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries
Work Personality Index Factorial Similarity Across 4 Countries Donald Macnab Psychometrics Canada Copyright Psychometrics Canada 2011. All rights reserved. The Work Personality Index is a trademark of
More informationEl-nabgha Fathy Mohammed, Michael Unher and Masakazu Sugawara (Accepted 4 March, 2009)
El-nabgha Fathy Mohammed, Michael Unher and Masakazu Sugawara (Accepted 4 March, 2009) Abstract : The present study aimed to identify the differences between Japanese and Egyptian university students in
More informationPersonality and Individual Differences
Personality and Individual Differences 45 (2008) 649 654 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Reliability and
More informationEncyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Big Five Taxonomy of Personality
Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology Big Five Taxonomy of Personality Contributors: Eric D. Heggestad Edited by: Steven G. Rogelberg Book Title: Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational
More informationNEO-PI-R Factor Structure in College Students
17 Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, January 2009, Vol. 35, No.1, 17-25. Special Feature NEO-PI-R Factor Structure in College Students Kamlesh Singh Indian Institute of Technology, New
More informationPersonality. Outline. Trait Approach. Individual Traits 10/22/2012. Lexical hypothesis: Enduring patterns of how people adapt to the world
Outline Defining Personality The Big 5 Measuring Personality Across Cultures Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality Traits Big 5 Across Cultures Big 5 and National Character Where do we get our personality?
More informationThe Cross-Cultural Generalizability of Zuckerman s Alternative Five-Factor Model of Personality
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 89(2), 188 196 Copyright C 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The Cross-Cultural Generalizability of Zuckerman s Alternative Five-Factor Model of Personality Jérôme
More informationChiba University AKIO WAKABAYASHI 1 *
bs_bs_banner Japanese Psychological Research 2014, Volume 56, No. 3, 211 223 doi: 10.1111/jpr.12045 A sixth personality domain that is independent of the Big Five domains: The psychometric properties of
More informationThe happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence
Personality and Individual Differences 42 (2007) 1633 1639 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Short Communication The happy personality: Mediational role of trait emotional intelligence Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic
More informationPersonality measures under focus: The NEO-PI-R and the MBTI
: The NEO-PI-R and the MBTI Author Published 2009 Journal Title Griffith University Undergraduate Psychology Journal Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/340329 Link to published version http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/145784
More informationThe Difference Analysis between Demographic Variables and Personal Attributes The Case of Internal Auditors in Taiwan
The Difference Analysis between Demographic Variables and Personal Attributes The Case of Internal Auditors in Taiwan Li-Jia Chiu and Neng-Tang Norman Huang Department of Technology Application and Human
More informationEncyclopedia of Counseling Personality Theories, Traits
Encyclopedia of Counseling Personality Theories, Traits Contributors: William Fleeson Edited by: Frederick T. L. Leong Book Title: Encyclopedia of Counseling Chapter Title: "Personality Theories, Traits"
More informationA comparison between three and ve factor models of Pakistani personality data
Personality and Individual Differences 31 2001) 1311±1319 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid A comparison between three and ve factor models of Pakistani personality data Shagufta Aziz a, Chris J. Jackson b,
More informationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) PSYSOC 2013
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140 ( 2014 ) 506 510 PSYSOC 2013 Personality Traits and Different Career Stages A Study on Indian School
More informationThe relationship between personality factors of the Big Five model and the vocational interests in the pharmaceutical field.
Romanian Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Hypnosis Volume 2, Issue 3, July-September 2015 Research Paper The relationship between personality factors of the Big Five model and the vocational
More informationSONJA GROBLER. submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF COMMERCE. in the subject
THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE ON PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT WITH THE BASIC TRAITS INVENTORY by SONJA GROBLER submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF COMMERCE in the subject INDUSTRIAL
More informationThe Questionnaire Big Six (QB6) in 26 Nations: Developing Cross-Culturally. Applicable Big Six, Big Five, and Big Two Inventories
Running head: THE QUESTIONNAIRE BIG SIX IN 26 NATIONS The Questionnaire Big Six (QB6) in 26 Nations: Developing Cross-Culturally Applicable Big Six, Big Five, and Big Two Inventories Amber Gayle Thalmayer
More informationMeasurement equivalence of the Big Five: Shedding further light on potential causes of the educational bias. Rammstedt, B. & Kemper, C. J.
Measurement equivalence of the Big Five: Shedding further light on potential causes of the educational bias Rammstedt, B. & Kemper, C. J. GESIS - Leibniz-Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim, Germany
More informationMeasuring Personality and Values Across Cultures: Imported Versus Indigenous Measures
Unit 4 General Psychological Issues in Cultural Perspective Subunit 4 Personality and Values Across Cultures Article 5 2-1-2003 Measuring Personality and Values Across Cultures: Imported Versus Indigenous
More informationAre Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Personality Profiles Meaningful? Differential Item and Facet Functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory
PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Are Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Personality Profiles Meaningful? Differential Item and Facet Functioning in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory A. Timothy
More informationRelational tendencies associated with broad personality dimensions
1 British Journal of Medical Psychology (2004), 00, 1 6 q 2004 The British Psychological Society www.bps.org.uk Brief report Relational tendencies associated with broad personality dimensions Dionyssios
More informationCross-Cultural Meta-Analyses
Unit 2 Theoretical and Methodological Issues Subunit 2 Methodological Issues in Psychology and Culture Article 5 8-1-2003 Cross-Cultural Meta-Analyses Dianne A. van Hemert Tilburg University, The Netherlands,
More informationSociodemographic Effects on the Test-Retest Reliability of the Big Five Inventory. Timo Gnambs. Osnabrück University. Author Note
Running head: TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY Sociodemographic Effects on the Test-Retest Reliability of the Big Five Inventory Timo Gnambs Osnabrück University Author Note Timo Gnambs, Institute of Psychology,
More informationTest Partnership TPAQ Series Psychometric Properties
Test Partnership TPAQ Series Psychometric Properties 2018 1 Construct Validity The IPIP-NEO-120 (Johnson, 2014) is a validated measure of the Big-5 model of personality, specifically the OCEAN model (Costa
More informationExtraversion. The Extraversion factor reliability is 0.90 and the trait scale reliabilities range from 0.70 to 0.81.
MSP RESEARCH NOTE B5PQ Reliability and Validity This research note describes the reliability and validity of the B5PQ. Evidence for the reliability and validity of is presented against some of the key
More informationThe NEO PI-R in a North European Context
This file was downloaded from the institutional repository BI Brage - http://brage.bibsys.no/bi (Open Access) The NEO PI-R in a North European Context Øyvind Lund Martinsen BI Norwegian Business School
More informationTraits & Trait Taxonomies
Traits & Trait Taxonomies Chapter 3 Three fundamental questions guide those who study traits: How should we conceptualize traits? How can we identify which traits are the most important from among the
More informationThe more like me, the better : Individual differences in social desirability ratings of personality items
The more like me, the better : Individual differences in social desirability ratings of personality items Kenn Konstabel Department of Psychology, Estonian Centre of Behavioural and Health Sciences University
More informationRosenthal, Montoya, Ridings, Rieck, and Hooley (2011) Appendix A. Supplementary material
NPI Factors and 16-Item NPI Rosenthal, Montoya, Ridings, Rieck, and Hooley (2011) Table 2 examines the relation of four sets of published factor-based NPI subscales and a shortened version of the NPI to
More informationTilburg University. Published in: Journal of Personality. Document version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Tilburg University Exploring the personality structure in the 11 languages of South Africa Nel, J.A.; Valchev, V.H.; Rothmans, S.; van de Vijver, Fons; Meiring, D.; de Bruin, G.P. Published in: Journal
More informationSusceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-toexperience influences responses to anchoring cues
McElroy, T. & Dowd, K. (2007). Susceptibility to anchoring effects: How openness-to-experience influences responses to anchoring cues. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(1): 48-53. (Feb 2007) Published by
More informationTheory and Method in Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Psychology
University of Windsor Scholarship at UWindsor International Symposium on Arab Youth Conference Presentations May 30th, 9:00 AM - 10:45 AM Theory and Method in Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Psychology
More informationUSING PERSONALITY TESTS IN RESEARCH: ARE LONGER TESTS NECESSARILY BETTER?
Chapter #23 USING PERSONALITY TESTS IN RESEARCH: ARE LONGER TESTS NECESSARILY BETTER? David Freeze 1, Tracy A. Freeze 2, Lisa A. Best 1, & Kathryn E. Flood 1 1 Department of Psychology, University of New
More informationEmotional Intelligence as a Credible Psychological Construct: Real but Elusive A Conceptual Interpretation of Meta-Analytic Investigation Outcomes
Emotional Intelligence as a Credible Psychological Construct: Real but Elusive A Conceptual Interpretation of Meta-Analytic Investigation Outcomes Jay M. Finkelman, MBA, MLS, PhD, ABPP Professor & Chair,
More informationAutobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiographical memory mediates basic tendencies and characteristic adaptations
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal of Research in Personality 42 (2008) 1060 1066 Brief Report Autobiographical memory as a dynamic process: Autobiographical memory mediates basic tendencies
More informationCitation for published version (APA): McCabe, K. O. (2015). The role of personality in the pursuit of context-specific goals [S.l.]: [S.n.
University of Groningen The role of personality in the pursuit of context-specific goals McCabe, Kira Olivia IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you
More informationThe Doctrine of Traits. Lecture 29
The Doctrine of Traits Lecture 29 1 The Doctrine of Traits Allport (1937) [A trait is] a generalized and focalized neuropsychic system... with the capacity to render many stimuli functionally equivalent,
More informationPersonality and beliefs about the world revisited: Expanding the nomological network of social axioms
Personality and Individual Differences 41 (2006) 201 211 www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Personality and beliefs about the world revisited: Expanding the nomological network of social axioms Sylvia Xiaohua
More informationThe stability of personality over time as a function of personality trait dominance
The stability of personality over time as a function of personality trait dominance Author Published 2009 Journal Title Griffith University Undergraduate Psychology Journal Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/340327
More informationTilburg University. Personality and culture in South Africa Valchev, V.H. Publication date: Link to publication
Tilburg University Personality and culture in South Africa Valchev, V.H. Publication date: 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Valchev, V. H. (2012). Personality and culture
More informationAbstract. Key words: bias, culture, Five-Factor Model, language, NEO-PI-R, NEO-PI-3, personality, South Africa
Dedication I dedicate this research to my parents who have supported me throughout my university career. Without their emotional and financial support, none of my academic accolades could have been possible.
More informationCorrecting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: An 18-country cross-cultural study. Beatrice Rammstedt Christoph J. Kemper Ingwer Borg
Correcting Big Five personality measurements for acquiescence: An 18-country cross-cultural study Beatrice Rammstedt Christoph J. Kemper Ingwer Borg GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim,
More informationRunning head: EXAMINATION OF THE BIG FIVE 1
Running head: EXAMINATION OF THE BIG FIVE 1 Format your title page according to your university guidelines. *This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a student. Used
More informationCulture & Survey Measurement. Timothy Johnson Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago
Culture & Survey Measurement Timothy Johnson Survey Research Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago What is culture? It is the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of
More informationClient Personality and Preference for Counseling Approach: Does Match Matter?
CLIENT PERSONALITY AND PREFERENCE 33 Professional Issues in Counseling 2010, Volume 10, Article 4, p. 33-39 Client Personality and Preference for Counseling Approach: Does Match Matter? Client Personality
More informationChinese Personality Traits and Mental Health: Mediating Effect of Coping Style
Chinese Personality Traits and Mental Health: Mediating Effect of Coping Style Denghao Zhang *, Yanjun Wu, Xue Pan Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, #59, Zhongguancun Avenue, Beijing,
More informationCLINICAL VS. BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT
CLINICAL VS. BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT Informal Tes3ng Personality Tes3ng Assessment Procedures Ability Tes3ng The Clinical Interview 3 Defining Clinical Assessment The process of assessing the client through
More informationTilburg University. Personality in Cultural Context van de Vijver, Fons; Leung, K. Published in: Journal of Personality
Tilburg University Personality in Cultural Context van de Vijver, Fons; Leung, K. Published in: Journal of Personality Document version: Peer reviewed version Publication date: 2001 Link to publication
More informationAffect, Behavior, Cognition, and Desire in the Big Five: An Analysis of Item Content and Structure
Affect, Behavior, Cognition, and Desire in the Big Five: An Analysis of Item Content and Structure Joshua Wilt Department of Psychological Sciences Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, OH USA July
More informationThe role of emotional intelligence and personality in moral reasoning
University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Sciences Book Chapters School of Sciences 2009 The role of emotional intelligence and personality in moral reasoning V Sagar Athota University of Notre
More informationVITA. A. Timothy Church
1 VITA A. Timothy Church Professor Emeritus of Counseling Psychology Department of Educational Leadership, Sport Studies, and Educational/Counseling Psychology Cleveland Hall, Room 351 Washington State
More informationM.A. Alhad & S.S. Turnip Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Ariyanto et al. (Eds) 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-62665-2 The association between the five-factor model
More informationDifferent styles of modeling
Different styles of modeling Marieke Timmerman m.e.timmerman@rug.nl 19 February 2015 Different styles of modeling (19/02/2015) What is psychometrics? 1/40 Overview 1 Breiman (2001). Statistical modeling:
More informationChapter Two: Cross-Cultural Research Methods
Chapter Two: Cross-Cultural Research Methods Types of Cross-Cultural Research: Method Validation Studies... *Validy refers to whether or not a scale, test or measure accurately measures what it is supposed
More informationTreating Depression among Haitians Guerda Nicolas PhD University of Miami
Treating Depression among Haitians Guerda Nicolas PhD University of Miami Haitians in the U.S. In the 1920 s there were approximately 500 documented Haitians in the US 37, 520 during the 1950 s and 1960
More informationHow Do Individual Experiences Aggregate to Shape Personality Development? Elliot M. Tucker-Drob
August 3, 2017 How Do Individual Experiences Aggregate to Shape Personality Development? Elliot M. Tucker-Drob Department of Psychology and Population Research Center University of Texas at Austin Acknowledgements:
More informationNeurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality
Graduate Faculty Psychology Bulletin Volume 3, No. 1, 2005 Neurotic Styles and the Five Factor Model of Personality Brian Norensberg, M.A. 1 & Peter Zachar Ph.D. 2 Abstract ~ This study investigates the
More informationRelationship between Teachers' Personality Traits and Self Efficacy: An Empirical Analysis of School Teachers in Karaikal Region (Puducherry)
Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2015 Relationship between Teachers' Personality Traits and Self Efficacy: An Empirical Analysis of School Teachers in Karaikal Region (Puducherry) Dr. N. S. PANDEY Assistant
More informationA Study of the Relationship of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, Self- Esteem and Personality Traits with Self-Efficacy
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Received 05 Jun. 2014 Accepted 29 Oct. 2014 2014, Science-Line Publication www.science-line.com ISSN: 2322-4770 Journal of Educational and Management Studies J. Educ. Manage. Stud., 4(4):
More informationWhat Are the Most Important Dimensions of Personality?Evidence from Studies of Descriptors in Diverse Languages
Social and Personality Psychology Compass 3/4 (2009): 620 637, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00188.x Blackwell Oxford, SPCO Social 1751-9004 Journal 188 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00188.x May 0620??? 637??? Review
More informationBasic personality dimensions and teachers self-efficacy
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 112 ( 2014 ) 593 602 International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology 2013 (ICEEPSY 2013)
More informationThree Subfactors of the Empathic Personality Kimberly A. Barchard, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
1 Three Subfactors of the Empathic Personality Kimberly A. Barchard, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Reference: Barchard, K.A. (2002, May). Three subfactors of the empathic personality. Poster presented
More informationUniversity of Warwick institutional repository:
University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please
More informationA Cross Cultural Study on Aggression in a Group of College Students from West Bengal and Jammu & Kashmir
The International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) ISSN: 2349-3429 (p) Volume 3, Issue 3, No.1, DIP: 18.01.002/20160303 ISBN: 978-1-365-03416-9 http://www.ijip.in April - June, 2016 A Cross
More informationGender and City Differences in Personality Traits Among Adolescents in Some Selected Cities of Nigeria
Cross-Cultural Communication Vol. 9, No. 5, 203, pp. -6 DOI:0.3968/j.ccc.92367002030905.25 ISSN 72-8358[Print] ISSN 923-6700[Online] www.cscanada.net www.cscanada.org and Differences in Personality Traits
More informationAn application of belief-importance theory with reference to the Big Five and trait emotional intelligence
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, 38(5), 697-710 Society for Personality Research (Inc.) DOI 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.5.697 An application of belief-importance theory with reference to the Big Five and
More informationUniversal Features of Personality Traits from the Observer s Perspective: Data from 50 Cultures. Robert R. McCrae and Antonio Terracciano
This is the Pre-Published Version Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in press. Universal Features of Personality Traits from the Observer s Perspective: Data from 50 Cultures Robert R. McCrae
More informationAbstract. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange Vol.4, No.2 June 30 (2018), pp
Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange Vol.4, No.2 June 30 (2018), pp. 43-50 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/apjcri.2018.06.05 Abstract The present study was intended to analyse discriminant
More informationCurrent Status and Challenges in the Assessment of the Personality Trait Spectrum in Youth 1)
2015 23 3 119 130 2015 Current Status and Challenges in the Assessment of the Personality Trait Spectrum in Youth 1) Filip De Fruyt Jun Moriya Yusuke Takahashi Ghent University, Belgium Kansai University
More informationUsing metaphorical items for describing personality constructs
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 33 (2012) 178 182 PSIWORLD 2011 Using metaphorical items for describing personality constructs Catalin Nedelcea a *, Iulia Ciorbea b, Andrei Gabriel Ion c a Department
More informationAn International Study of the Reliability and Validity of Leadership/Impact (L/I)
An International Study of the Reliability and Validity of Leadership/Impact (L/I) Janet L. Szumal, Ph.D. Human Synergistics/Center for Applied Research, Inc. Contents Introduction...3 Overview of L/I...5
More informationPaul Irwing, Manchester Business School
Paul Irwing, Manchester Business School Factor analysis has been the prime statistical technique for the development of structural theories in social science, such as the hierarchical factor model of human
More informationPurpose of Workshop. Faculty. Culturally Sensitive Research. ISOQOL Workshop 19 Oct 2005
Introduction to ing Health-Related Measures in Diverse Populations Pre-conference Workshop 2 The International Society for Quality of Life Research Center for Aging in Diverse Communities: A Resource Center
More information10/22/2007 EDPY 442: INTRODUCTION TO COUNSELLING POINTS TO CONSIDER AND REFLECT ON... WHAT IS CULTURE?
EDPY 442: INTRODUCTION TO COUNSELLING Counselling in a Multicultural & Diverse Society October 23, 2007 POINTS TO CONSIDER AND REFLECT ON... How do you understand, define, and use the following words in
More informationRelationship of Values and Personality Traits in Malaysian College Students
Full paper Sains Humanika Relationship of Values and Personality Traits in Malaysian College Students Mazni Mustapha a,b*, Michael E. Hyland b a Faculty of Psychology and Education, Universiti Malaysia
More informationThe comparison of sensation seeking and five big factors of personality between internet dependents and non-dependents
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 (2011) 1029 1033 WCES-2011 The comparison of sensation seeking and five big factors of personality between internet
More informationPersonality and Self-Esteem in Newlyweds. Todd K. Shackelford. Oakland University. Richard L. Michalski. Hollins University
Running head: PERSONALITY AND SELF-ESTEEM [in press, Personality and Individual Differences, July 2011] Personality and Self-Esteem in Newlyweds Todd K. Shackelford Oakland University Richard L. Michalski
More informationAdmission of International Students
Admission of International Students Fernando A. Ortiz, Ph.D., ABPP Gonzaga University St. John Vianney Center Outline and Objectives Summarize Survey Findings Introduce Personal Journey as International
More informationStress Reactivity and Vulnerability to Depressed Mood in College Students
Stress Reactivity and Vulnerability to Depressed Mood in College Students Gary Felsten Stress Reactivity and Depressed Mood 1 Department of Psychology, Indiana University Purdue University Columbus 4601
More informationDifferent nationalities really have different personalities ( )
Different nationalities really have different personalities ( ) : http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170413-different-nationalities-really-have-different-personalities 1 Each country may have its own unique
More informationBig Five FFM Five-Factor Model. 1 Neuroticism 3 (Openness to experience) O + O - 4 (Agreeableness) 5 (Conscientiousness) N E O A C
2004 12 4 578~ 583 Advances in Psychological Science 310028 5. B849:C93 Big Five FFM Five-Factor Model 16PF EPQ 5 1949 Fiske Costa McCrae [1] 1 1.1 5 5 1 Neuroticism N + 2Extraversion 3 (Openness to experience)
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More informationPride. Jessica L. Tracy. University of British Columbia
Pride Jessica L. Tracy University of British Columbia Address correspondence to: Jessica L. Tracy Department of Psychology University of British Columbia 2136 West Mall Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 P: 604-822-2718;
More informationTHE FIVE FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUALISM / COLLECTIVISM IN SOUTH AFRICA: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY
PINS, 2009, 37, 39-54 THE FIVE FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUALISM / COLLECTIVISM IN SOUTH AFRICA: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY Liesl Vogt and Sumaya Laher Department ofpsychology School of Human and
More informationCulture & Personality. Outline. How Do We Compare? Kimberley A. Clow. What is Culture Approaches to Culture. Summary. Comparative Approach
Culture & Personality Kimberley A. Clow kclow2@uwo.ca http://instruct.uwo.ca/psychology/257e-570 Office Hour: Thursdays 2-3pm Office: S302 Outline What is Culture Approaches to Culture Comparative Approach
More informationPersonality: Definitions
Personality: Definitions Anastasi "Personality tests are instruments for the measurement of emotional, motivational, interpersonal and attitudinal characteristics, as distinct from abilities. Kaplan &
More informationBook Review. Review of Cultural Psychology
The Journal of Social Psychology, 2010, 150(2), 231 234 Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Book Review Review of Cultural Psychology VSOC 0022-4545 The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 150, No. 2,
More informationImplicit Personality Conceptions of the Nguni Cultural- Linguistic Groups of South Africa
Implicit Personality Conceptions of the Nguni Cultural- Linguistic Groups of South Africa Cross-Cultural Research 45(3) 235 266 DOI: 10.1177/1069397111402462 Online version of this article can be found
More informationInstrument equivalence across ethnic groups. Antonio Olmos (MHCD) Susan R. Hutchinson (UNC)
Instrument equivalence across ethnic groups Antonio Olmos (MHCD) Susan R. Hutchinson (UNC) Overview Instrument Equivalence Measurement Invariance Invariance in Reliability Scores Factorial Invariance Item
More informationThe dual pathway model of overeating Ouwens, Machteld; van Strien, T.; van Leeuwe, J. F. J.; van der Staak, C. P. F.
Tilburg University The dual pathway model of overeating Ouwens, Machteld; van Strien, T.; van Leeuwe, J. F. J.; van der Staak, C. P. F. Published in: Appetite Publication date: 2009 Link to publication
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND REVIEW
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND REVIEW BIG FIVE INVENTORY (BFI) OF PERSONALITY TRAITS OF ENTREPRENEURS S.Subramanian* 1, Dr.V.Gopalakrishnan 2, Dr.I.Prem Rose Thayammal 3 1 Assistant Professor,
More informationCulture and the Treatment of Abnormal Behavior. Traditional Psychotherapy CULTURE AND PSYCHOTHERAPY. Outline. Contemporary Psychotherapy
Outline Culture and the Treatment of Abnormal Behavior Chapter 12 Culture and Psychotherapy Treatment of Abnormal Behavior across Diverse Cultures in the United States Treatment Issues Culturally Competent
More informationThe Australian National University
Personality stability and change: An investigation of social identity processes Hanzhang Lin A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The Australian National University Submitted October
More informationRunning Head: TESTING BIAS IN CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH
Cross-Cultural Bias 1 Running Head: TESTING BIAS IN CROSS-CULTURAL RESEARCH Testing Bias in Cross-Cultural Research Moira E. Hanna Clemson University Cross-Cultural Bias 2 Testing Bias in Cross-Cultural
More informationFacebook Therapy? Why Do People Share Self-Relevant Content Online? Eva Buechel. University of Miami. Jonah Berger. University of Pennsylvania
Facebook Therapy 1 Facebook Therapy? Why Do People Share Self-Relevant Content Online? Eva Buechel University of Miami Jonah Berger University of Pennsylvania Word Count: 1000 Contact Information: Jonah
More informationThe State Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI)
The State Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) The STAXI was developed with two goals in mind.. The first was to develop a measure of the components of anger in the context of both normal and abnormal
More information