Click here to order Cigars!
|
|
- Marjory Long
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 California Non-Smokers Poised to Vote for Their Own Tax Increase P of 2 26/06/ :33 Specials Ashtrays Gifts Samplers Reviews News California Nonsmokers Poised to Vote Their Own Tax Increase By Norman E. Kjono October 2, 2006 California citizens, about 86 percent of whom are reportedly nonsmokers, will soon vote on the Coalition for a Healthy California s Tobacco Tax Act of 2006 (Proposition 86). A September 27, 2006 San Francisco Bay Area CBS 5 poll that surveyed 900 California adults reports 56 percent of voters will vote Yes on Proposition 86. The poll raises an important perspective: judging by the percentage of nonsmokers in California, it appears that about 30 percent of those who do not smoke already understand Proposition 86 to be a seriously flawed ballot measure. What might those voters understand about California s proposed tobacco tax increase that 70 percent of their fellow nonsmokers apparently do not? Is it possible that 30 percent of California s nonsmokers can see beyond the expedience of shifting the tax burden to a politically unpopular minority, to comprehend important facts? History of s Close examination of Proposition 86 indicates that California nonsmokers who reportedly would vote No on Proposition 86 may be the more astute, indeed prescient, voters. Many important arguments against this new tax have been presented by several No on 86 groups and Web sites. This article focuses on additional information that has not been discussed to date, but which is central to the fiscal responsibility aspects of Proposition 86. The additional information also concerns facts that tobacco control advocates aware of, but have not disclosed in their advocacy to pass $2.1 billion in new taxes. Information that is not disclosed raises the possibility that the 70 percent of nonsmokers who would vote Yes are ultimately voting for a $2.1 billion per year in tax increases on themselves. I explain why below, in context of what we citizens in Washington have experienced after passing a similar cigarette tax ballot measure, Initiative to the People 773, in November The costly experience of taxpayers in other states may provide constructive guidance for California voters. I approach this subject in three short sections. First, we take a look at the new revenues that Proposition 86 will allegedly raise in the near term and the fixed, long term state expenses that it will create. Second, information concerning tobacco control s long term nicotine policy as recently published in a national journal is discussed. Third that information is summarized in terms of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Parity Pricing. Finally, a brief summary of those facts will show that Proposition 86 could be the largest state tax revenue give-away to corporate special-interests in the history of the state. Those who would vote Yes in Proposition 86 can then decide if they want to fund from their pockets and in perpetuity $2.1 billion in taxpayer subsidies for the biggest of Big Drugs. Next
2 1 of 2 26/06/ :34 Specials Ashtrays Gifts Samplers Reviews News Revenue vs. Expenses According to a May 26, 2006 Executive Summary published by the Tobacco Control Section of the California Department of Health LINK the ballot measure will raise $2.27 billion per year in new cigarette excise tax revenues and another $58.6 million each year in increases sales tax revenue. A July 20, 2006 Legislative Analyst s Office report LINK that shows allocations for $2.1 billion per year in new tax revenues from this measure, the three largest beneficiaries of those new tax revenues are: 1. Hospital emergency care: $756 million 2. Children s health coverage: $367 million 3. Tobacco control: a.) Tobacco cessation: $ 18 million b.) Media campaign: $ 55 million c.) Competitive grants $ 36 million d.) Local health departments $ 34 million e.) Prevention education: $ 18 million f.) Evaluation: $ 4 million g.) Research: $ 32 million Tobacco Control Total: $197 million History of s The bottom line is that the California Department of Health projects $2.3 billion in immediate revenue from Proposition 86 and the Legislative Analyst s Office itemizes a full-page list of $2.1 billion in long-term, permanent state costs that will legislated for taxpayers if Proposition 86 passes. Predictably, the principal beneficiaries of new tax revenues from that ballot measure are also those who have sponsored and are aggressively promoting the ballot measure. But what if the projected $2 billion-plus in new cigarette tax revenues do not materialize as represented? Taxpayers in Washington have learned a tough, expensive lesson about tobacco control advocate s revenue projections since I-773 passed in Washington has the strictest smoking ban in the nation, even exceeding California s ban, and the third highest cigarette excise tax as well ($20.25 per carton.) But careful analysis of cigarette consumption reveals an important fact: Washington collects only 55 percent of the cigarette excise taxes that its adult smoking prevalence rate says it should receive. If Washington s trend follows in California, all taxpayers smokers and nonsmokers alike would be funding with new taxes a revenue shortfall of $1 billion per year to fund the long term, permanent costs created by Proposition 86. Considering that Proposition 86 would place California as the No. 1 cigarette tax in the nation with $3.47 per pack in total taxes, taxpayers can reasonably expect that declines in taxable cigarette consumption, and therefore cigarette taxes collected, could be even more severe. Next
3 1 of 2 26/06/ :35 Specials Ashtrays Gifts Samplers Reviews News In 2005 the Washington legislature passed a new estate tax (to replace a previous death tax that the state Supreme Court had ruled illegal), plus more taxes on alcohol and tobacco, to fund important state budget items such as K-12 education. Are California voters who would vote Yes on Proposition 86 willing to fund from their own pockets through new taxes $1 billion-plus in permanent revenue shortfalls that the ballot measure could create? A Comprehensive Long Term Nicotine Policy Tobacco Control, 2005;14: Toward a Comprehensive Long Term Nicotine Policy N Gray, J E Henningfield, N L Benowitz, G N Connolly, C Dresler, K Fagerstrom, M J Jarvis and P Boyle Received 7 October 2004 Accepted 19 January 2005 Clean nicotine is defined as nicotine free enough of tobacco toxicants to pass regulatory approval. A three phase policy is proposed. The initial phase requires regulatory capture of cigarette and smoke constituents liberalising the market for clean nicotine; regulating all nicotine sources from the same agency;... The second phase anticipates clean nicotine overtaking tobacco as the primary source of the drug (facilitated by use of regulatory and taxation measures); simplification of tobacco products by limitation of additives which make tobacco attractive and easier to smoke (but tobacco would still be able to provide a satisfying dose of nicotine). The third phase includes a progressive reduction in the nicotine content of cigarettes, with clean nicotine freely available to take the place of tobacco as society s main nicotine source. (Underline, bold, italic added.) History of s The above comprehensive long term nicotine policy research paper was published in 2005 by the journal Tobacco Control. One of the paper s authors, Neal Benowitz is with Department of Medicine, Psychiatry and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Francisco. He has been actively involved as a leader in tobacco control advocacy for about two decades. California tobacco control advocates who support Proposition 86 are necessarily aware of the contents of the above research paper. What the paper coauthored by Benowitz reveals is a clear and concise plan to replace tobacco with Nicotine Replacement Therapy delivery devices such as Nicorette gum, NicoDerm CQ patches, Commit lozenges, and Nicotrol nicotine inhalers. But no Nicotine Replacement Therapy product pays any state excise tax in Washington. So the comprehensive long term nicotine policy becomes a plan to cause consumers to switch nicotine brands from highly-taxed cigarettes to ZERO TAXED Smoke Free Nicotine Replacement Therapy. In effect, each box of Nicorette or NicoDerm CQ, etc. sold in Washington becomes a transfer of $20.25 in state excise tax revenues out of state coffers, removing those funds from state budgets. Carried to its Phase 3 completion as described above, that nicotine policy would reduce California cigarette excise tax revenues to virtual ZERO because the written purpose of the policy is for zero taxed Nicotine Replacement Therapy products to take the
4 2 of 2 26/06/ :35 place of tobacco as society s main nicotine source. We therefore observe that tobacco control advocates and their political supporters hold out with their left hand and handsomely benefit from Proposition 86, while holding behind their back in the right hand a clear and concise plan to eliminate the cigarette excise tax revenues that fund new state costs the ballot measure creates. That creates the appearance of Proposition 86 being an underhanded bait and switch for California taxpayers. It would be nice if tobacco control advocates were required to keep both hands above the table when playing revenue roulette with taxpayer s money. In Washington, we have learned about that apparent bait and switch the hard way. Our state s 55 percent cigarette excise tax collection rate painfully illustrates the costs of tobacco control s long term nicotine policy by providing a measure of how deeply that policy encroaches on projected cigarette excise tax receipts. Those who would vote Yes on Proposition 86 are funding tobacco control s bets on its own in-house Nicotine Replacement Therapy roulette wheel. The house always wins. Next Copyright 2006 Experience/AdeptMarketingConcepts Home - s - Humidors - Cutters - Lighters - About Us - Contact Us - Resources - Legal - Site Map Wholesale s - Wholesale Lighters - Wholesale Cutters - Wholesale Humidors
5 1 of 2 26/06/ :35 Specials Ashtrays Gifts Samplers Reviews News Parity Pricing Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, July 19, 2006 Higher ette Taxes Increasing cigarette taxes is a WIN, WIN, WIN solution for states - a health win that reduces smoking and saves lives; a fiscal win that raises revenue and reduces health care costs; and a political win that is popular with the public. It's no wonder that 42 states and the District of Columbia have increased cigarette taxes since January 1, 2002, more than doubling the average state cigarette tax from 43.4 cents to 93.7 cents a pack. The average state cigarette tax will rise even more to 96.1 cents per pack in January 2007 when recently approved tax increases in Hawaii and Texas take effect. Considering the long term nicotine policy, the above statement is misleading. Perhaps there will always be those who the campaign regards as nicotine addicts. But what nicotine products will they use? History of s Washington s I-773, which added 60 cents per pack in cigarette taxes, passed November During the 2005 legislative session Washington legislators passed an additional 60 cents per pack cigarette taxes. Total cigarette tax increases from 2000 to 2006 were $1.20 per pack, or $12.00 per carton. In 2000 I began a research project. I bought a carton of Marlboro cigarettes and a box of Nicorette gum at the same store on the same day. Purchase receipts and copies of the box or carton with lot numbers were preserved. What I learned from this project was at once stunning and troubling. I compared the prices for Marlboro and Nicorette purchases in June 2000 and January The receipts reflected the tax increase in the cost of Marlboro. But the receipts also revealed that for the period that spanned a $12.00 increase for cigarettes, the cost of Nicorette increased by $12.06 per box, on a per unit basis. The phenomenon where the cost of product A increases in correspondence with price increases for product B is referred to as Parity Pricing. Since GlaxoSmithKline does not pay state excise tax on Nicorette, the increases in the cost of cigarettes due to the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids tobacco tax advocacy became bottom line profits for the company. In effect, every box of Nicotine Replacement Therapy sold becomes a state subsidy for the product s manufacturers and distributors. The story concerning Washington s I-773 and California s Proposition 86 therefore converge around a deeply troubling set of facts concerning two corporations and one private foundation. 1. GlaxoSmithKline distributes Nicorette gum, NicoDerm CQ patches, and Commit lozenges. 2. Johnson & Johnson subsidiary ALZA Corp. subsidiary manufacturers NicoDerm CQ for GlaxoSmithKline. Through its June 26, 2006 purchase of Pfizer Consumer Health Care for $16.6 billion Johnson & Johnson will also own Nicorette, if the transaction is approved by the Federal Trade Commission under
6 2 of 2 26/06/ : Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act requirements. 3. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which owns a reported $3.9 billion stake in Johnson & Johnson common stock has invested at least $446 million in grants to tobacco control advocates since 1992 (including $84 million in grants to the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids). Such advocacy not only inflates the cost of cigarettes for consumers but through Parity Pricing it also artificially inflates the cost of Nicotine Replacement Therapy smoking cessation products as well. Like California s Proposition 86, I-773 was actively supported by the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids. As noted above the campaign has an $84 million vested interest in Proposition 86 passing. The University of California at San Francisco has also received tens of millions in tobacco control grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation under the foundation s SmokeLess States program. Tobacco control advocates who aggressively support Proposition 86 are directly tied through $3.9 billion of common stock and $446 million in special-interest grants to the corporations who will benefit the most through Nicotine Replacement Therapy price increases. Considering the above, my recommendation to those who would still vote Yes on Proposition 86 is simple. Go ahead, voters, put up your own money to fund tobacco control s bet on its own in-house tax roulette wheel. What slot do you think the tax revenue ball is going to fall into? You re gambling $2.1 billion per year in new state costs that the house will not win on its own bet. Mr. Kjono has researched and written about tobacco control for the past twelve years. He is a former columnist and board member for Mr. Kjono s commentary about youth smoking, Let s Really Save the Kids was republished in the Luncent Press/Greenhaven Books 2000 anthology Teen Smoking under the title A Better Way to Talk To Teens About Smoking. His works on this subject have also been published in numerous trade journals, including the Los Angeles Daily Journal, plus Chief Engineer and Heating/Piping/Airconditioning magazines. He has also appeared on BBC London, Fox News, and CNN concerning tobacco control subjects. Mr. Kjono can be reached at normkalr@earthlink.net. Copyright 2006 Experience/AdeptMarketingConcepts Home - s - Humidors - Cutters - Lighters - About Us - Contact Us - Resources - Legal - Site Map Wholesale s - Wholesale Lighters - Wholesale Cutters - Wholesale Humidors
Oklahoma Turning Point Council (OTPC)
The Cigarette Tax Oklahoma Turning Point Council (OTPC) OTPC is an independent statewide council focused on education and advocacy efforts aimed at improving Oklahoma s health status The Turning Point
More informationExecutive Summary. Overall conclusions of this report include:
Executive Summary On November 23, 1998, 46 states settled their lawsuits against the nation s major tobacco companies to recover tobacco-related health care costs, joining four states Mississippi, Texas,
More informationHow Price Increases Reduce Tobacco Use
How Price Increases Reduce Tobacco Use Frank J. Chaloupka Director, ImpacTeen, University of Illinois at Chicago www.uic.edu/~fjc www.impacteen.org www.tobaccoevidence.net TUPTI, Kansas City, July 8 2002
More informationTobacco Control Program Funding in Indiana: A Critical Assessment. Final Report to the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation
Tobacco Control Program Funding in Indiana: A Critical Assessment Final Report to the Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation John A. Tauras, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Economics, UIC Faculty Scholar,
More informationRADM Patrick O Carroll, MD, MPH Senior Advisor, Assistant Secretary for Health, US DHSS
Ending the Tobacco Epidemic RADM Patrick O Carroll, MD, MPH Senior Advisor, Assistant Secretary for Health, US DHSS Tim McAfee, MD, MPH Senior Medical Officer, Office on Smoking and Health, CDC www.nwcphp.org/hot-topics
More informationSubmission to the World Health Organization on the Global Tobacco Control Committee
Submission to the World Health Organization on the Global Tobacco Control Committee Massachusetts Coalition For a Healthy Future Gregory N. Connolly, D.M.D., M.P.H. 250 Washington Street, 4 th Floor Boston,
More informationMARIJUANA LEGALIZATION. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
PROPOSITION MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION. OFFICIAL TITLE AND SUMMARY Legalizes marijuana under state law, for use by adults 21 or older. Designates state agencies to license and regulate marijuana industry.
More informationCDC s Best Practices for Tobacco Control Programs
Best Practices in Tobacco Control Programs: Update Stanton Glantz, PhD Center for Tobacco Studies University of California, San Francisco 2007 2011 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health CDC s
More informationHow to Regulate E-Cigarettes? Are we asking the right questions?
How to Regulate E-Cigarettes? Are we asking the right questions? Eric N. Lindblom Director, Tobacco Control and Food & Drug Law O Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law Georgetown University
More informationAPPENDIX A: Tobacco Marketing Expenditure Categories
APPENDIX A: Tobacco Marketing Expenditure Categories The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issues reports on annual cigarette and smokeless tobacco marketing expenditures, which are based on data from the
More informationCountry profile. Myanmar
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Myanmar WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 23 October 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationSENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 30, 2014
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 0, 0 Sponsored by: Senator JOSEPH F. VITALE District (Middlesex) Senator LORETTA WEINBERG District (Bergen) SYNOPSIS Increases tobacco
More informationCountry profile. Nepal
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Nepal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 3 December 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCalifornia s Proposition 86: A Review of Voting Patterns and Broader Issues
California s Proposition 86: A Review of Voting Patterns and Broader Issues By Norman E. Kjono January 14, 2007 Copyright Norman E. Kjono 16149 Redmond Way No. 221 Redmond WA 98052 (425) 497-8187 normkarl@earthlink.net
More informationTobacco use is Wisconsin s
Focus on... Smoking Increasing tobacco taxes: An evidencebased measure to reduce tobacco use Marion Ceraso, MHS; David Ahrens, MS; Patrick Remington, MD Tobacco use is Wisconsin s single most important
More informationCountry profile. Timor-Leste
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Timor-Leste WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 May 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationThe Economics of Smoking
The Economics of Smoking One of the potential problems (from an economic perspective) with smoking is that there may be an externality in consumption, so there may be difference between the private and
More informationCountry profile. Lebanon
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2013 Country profile Lebanon WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 4 March 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationAmendment 72 Increase Cigarette and Tobacco Taxes
Amendment 72 Increase Cigarette and Tobacco Taxes ANALYSIS Amendment 72 proposes amending the Colorado Constitution to: increase the state tax on a pack of cigarettes from $0.84 to $2.59; increase the
More informationPhilip Morris & Tobacco Control
Philip Morris & Tobacco Control By Norman E. Kjono July 31, 2006 Tobacco control advocates often claim that the biggest of Big Tobacco, Philip Morris (stock symbol MO), is an arch-foe that seeks to torpedo
More informationGet the Facts: Minnesota s 2013 Tobacco Tax Increase is Improving Health
Get the Facts: Minnesota s 2013 Tobacco Tax Increase is Improving Health February 10, 2015 Lisa R. Mattson, MD Frank J. Chaloupka, PhD Raymond Boyle, PhD, MPH Overview The tobacco industry has a well-known
More informationThe facts are in: Minnesota's 2013 tobacco tax increase is improving health
https://www.minnpost.com/co... The facts are in: Minnesota's 20... Page 1 of 6 Community Voices features opinion pieces from a wide variety of authors and perspectives. (Submission Guidelines) The facts
More informationTobacco-Control Policy Workshop:
Tobacco-Control Policy Workshop: Goal: to introduce Mega-Country leaders to an effective policy framework for tobacco control and to develop skills to promote policy implementation. Objectives: As a result
More informationCDC and Bridging the Gap: Introducing New State Appropriation, Grants, and Expenditure Data in the STATE System
CDC and Bridging the Gap: Introducing New State Appropriation, Grants, and Expenditure Data in the STATE System Frank Chaloupka, PhD (University of Illinois-Chicago) Jidong Huang, PhD (University of Illinois-Chicago)
More informationTobacco Control Highlights Alaska
Tobacco Control Highlights Alaska Health Consequences and Costs Smoking - Attributable Mortality (SAM), 2000-2004 Smoking - Attributable Productivity Losses, 2000-2004 Smoking - Attributable Expenditures
More informationTobacco and Cigarette Taxes
Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy Primer Tobacco and Cigarette Taxes Idaho s Tobacco and Cigarette Taxes Generate Revenue Used to Help Communities Thrive In order for Idaho communities to thrive, they need
More informationTobacco Data, Prevention Spending, and the Toll of Tobacco Use in North Carolina
Tobacco Data, Prevention Spending, and the Toll of Tobacco Use in North Carolina North Carolina Alliance for Health 2017 0 Table of Contents Highlights from the Surgeon General s Report on E-Cigarette
More informationPreview of the Convenience Store Report. Danny McGoldrick Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids
Preview of the Convenience Store Report Danny McGoldrick dmcgoldrick@tobaccofreekids.org Why Convenience Store Report Convenience stores killing us on policy change efforts (e.g. tax) Show their role in
More informationOpen Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government
Open Letter to Financial Secretary, Hong Kong SAR Government 1 6 February 2018 Raising Tobacco Tax by 100% to Lower Smoking Prevalence and Achieve Tobacco Endgame in 2027 Hong Kong: Tobacco kills nearly
More informationHigher rate now: Why excise tax on tobacco is long overdue for an increase
Higher rate now: Why excise tax on tobacco is long overdue for an increase Canadian Medical Association: Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce A healthy population
More informationJanuary 2019 Volume 8, Issue 1
January 2019 Volume 8, Issue 1 The Southern Tier Tobacco Awareness Coalition (STTAC) seeks to build healthier communities through tobacco-free living in Chemung, Schuyler, & Steuben, NY. Erie County Passes
More informationTHREE BIG IMPACT ISSUES
THREE BIG IMPACT ISSUES Tim McAfee, MD, MPH Director CDC Office on Smoking and Health Presented at the National Cancer Policy Forum Workshop on Reducing Tobacco-Related Cancer Incidence and Mortality June
More informationTobacco Control Policy at the State Level. Progress and Challenges. Danny McGoldrick Institute of Medicine Washington, DC June 11, 2012
Tobacco Control Policy at the State Level Progress and Challenges Danny McGoldrick Institute of Medicine Washington, DC June 11, 2012 The Tools of Tobacco Control Tobacco Taxes Smoke-free Laws Comprehensive
More informationTOBACCO TAXATION, TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY, AND TOBACCO USE
TOBACCO TAXATION, TOBACCO CONTROL POLICY, AND TOBACCO USE Frank J. Chaloupka Director, ImpacTeen, University of Illinois at Chicago www.uic.edu/~fjc www.impacteen.org The Fact is, Raising Tobacco Prices
More informationTobacco Control Highlights Wisconsin
Tobacco Control Highlights Wisconsin Health Consequences and Costs Smoking - Attributable Mortality (SAM), 2000-2004 Smoking - Attributable Productivity Losses, 2000-2004 Smoking - Attributable Expenditures
More informationTrends in Ohioans Health Status and Income
October 200 Trends in Ohioans Health Status and Income Since 2005, household incomes in Ohio have steadily declined. In 2005, 65% of Ohio adults were living in households with an annual income over 200%
More informationTobacco tax advocates spar over priorities. By Dorsey Griffith -- Bee Medical Writer Saturday, December 24, 2005 Story appeared on Page A1 of The Bee
Tobacco tax advocates spar over priorities By Dorsey Griffith -- Bee Medical Writer Saturday, December 24, 2005 Story appeared on Page A1 of The Bee Lung cancer research gets woefully short-changed in
More informationMarijuana Legalization 2016: Understanding the policy landscape and design considerations
Marijuana Legalization 2016: Understanding the policy landscape and design considerations Beau Kilmer, PhD Co-Director, RAND Drug Policy Research Center Senior Policy Researcher, RAND Corporation Professor,
More informationMitch Zeller, Director, Center for Tobacco Products, FDA September 19, 2013 Kansas Public Health Association
Regulatory Public Laws Compliance & Education Policies Science & Enforcement & Communications The FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Its Role in Reducing Tobacco Use Mitch Zeller, Director, Center
More informationPuffs and Pounds: Lessons from Tobacco Control for Combating the Obesity Epidemic. Kenneth E. Warner Dean, Univ. of Michigan School of Public Health
Puffs and Pounds: Lessons from Tobacco Control for Combating the Obesity Epidemic Kenneth E. Warner Dean, Univ. of Michigan School of Public Health Health consequences of the antismoking campaign Since
More informationTaxing E-Cigarettes: the Next (Complicated) Frontier. March 26, 2015
Taxing E-Cigarettes: the Next (Complicated) Frontier March 26, 2015 PRESENTERS PRESENTERS: Mark Meaney, JD, MA, Staff Attorney Tobacco Control Legal Consortium, Public Health Law Center Molly Moilanen,
More informationDRAFT FOR CONSULTATION
DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Member s Bill Explanatory note General policy statement Smoking rates and tobacco consumption have declined in recent decades. However, 4 500 to 5 000 New Zealanders still die prematurely
More informationSave Lives and Save Money
Tobacco Control Policies & Programs Save Lives and Save Money Matthew L. Myers President, Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids Alliance for Health Reform Luncheon Briefing July 13, 2012 1 We Know How to Reduce
More informationREGULATORY OPTIONS FOR MOVING TO THE ELIMINATION OF SMOKING. Ron Borland PhD
REGULATORY OPTIONS FOR MOVING TO THE ELIMINATION OF SMOKING Ron Borland PhD Tobacco Smoking Extremely harmful to health Kills over half of long-term users Reduces quality life years in most Slows recovery
More informationThe Tobacco and Vaping Products Act: Implications for E-Cigarette Point-of-Sale Promotion
The Tobacco and Vaping Products Act: Implications for E-Cigarette Point-of-Sale Promotion Background: E-Cigarette Point-of-Sale Promotion September 2018 Key Message: Vaping e-cigarettes can lead to dependence,
More informationCigarette Consumption: Estimating the Effects of an Excise Cigarette Tax in California
Caroline Hymel PPPA6017 Cigarette Consumption: Estimating the Effects of an Excise Cigarette Tax in California Summary Recently, California passed Proposition 56, which increased the tax on cigarettes
More informationNew Jersey s Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program: Importance of Sustained Funding
New Jersey s Comprehensive Tobacco Control Program: Importance of Sustained Funding History of Tobacco Control Funding Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in the U.S., killing more than
More informationCountry profile. Turkmenistan. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011
Country profile Turkmenistan WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 13 May 2011 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Austria
Country profile Austria WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 28 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2005 Socioeconomic context
More informationCountry profile. Sweden
Country profile Sweden WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 July 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Angola
Country profile Angola WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationBosnia and Herzegovina
Country profile Bosnia and Herzegovina WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 July 2009 Socioeconomic context
More informationCountry profile. Yemen
Country profile Yemen WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 20 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 22 February 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationE-liquid Questions. Will you charge more for the 10ml pre-mixed bottles? No, we will try to keep our pricing structure as close to current as we can.
E-liquid Questions What will be the biggest size bottle I can buy (pre-mixed)? 10ml will be the largest size of bottle in which we can supply nicotine-containing fluid (i.e. e-liquid). We will continue
More informationCountry profile. Switzerland
Country profile Switzerland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationEffective Tobacco Tax Reform: Evidence from China
Effective Tobacco Tax Reform: Evidence from China Rose Zheng Director, WHO Collaborating Center for Tobacco and Economics Professor, University of International Business and Economics (UIBE), Beijing,
More informationThe cost-effectiveness of raising the legal smoking age in California Ahmad S
The cost-effectiveness of raising the legal smoking age in California Ahmad S Record Status This is a critical abstract of an economic evaluation that meets the criteria for inclusion on NHS EED. Each
More informationCountry profile. Gambia. Note: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table.
WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2011 Country profile Gambia te: Where no data were available, " " shows in the table. Where data were not required, " " shows in the table. WHO Framework Convention
More informationcjly STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 5, 2019 Honorable Mayor and City Council
cjly STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 5, 2019 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Logan Phillippo, Policy & Management Analyst/ Michael George, Management Analyst Subject: Attachments: Request
More informationCountry profile. Cuba
Country profile Cuba WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) t ratified Socioeconomic context Population
More informationRESPONSE FROM ALTRIA:
RESPONSE FROM ALTRIA: FDA Regulation of Tobacco http://www.altria.com/en/cms/about_altria/federal_regulation_of_tobacco/default.aspx?src=top_nav http://www.fda.gov/tobaccoproducts/default.htm The Food
More informationCountry profile. Senegal
Country profile Senegal WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 19 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 27 January 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationOTPC executive committee is comprised of volunteers representing various community sectors within Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Turning Point Council
1 OTPC executive committee is comprised of volunteers representing various community sectors within Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Turning Point Council champions the Turning Point philosophy by supporting community
More informationCountry profile. Bahrain. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007
Country profile Bahrain WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 20 March 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Hungary
Country profile Hungary WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 7 April 2004 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Poland
Country profile Poland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 14 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 15 September 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Italy
Country profile Italy WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 2 July 2008 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCountry profile. Republic of Moldova
Country profile Republic of Moldova WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 29 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 February 2009 Socioeconomic
More informationCountry profile. Ukraine
Country profile Ukraine WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 25 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 June 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Country profile United Kingdom of Great Britain and rthern Ireland WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent)
More informationCountry profile. Egypt
Country profile Egypt WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 17 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 25 February 2005 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCanadian Experience in Tobacco Regulations. NCDs Expert Meeting Washington, DC November 17, 2014
Canadian Experience in Tobacco Regulations NCDs Expert Meeting Washington, DC November 17, 2014 Presentation overview Tobacco Control Successes Historical Perspective Legislation and Taxation Federal Tobacco
More informationTOBACCO CONTROL RESOURCE PROGRAM
TOBACCO CONTROL RESOURCE PROGRAM County of San Diego Health and Human Services Agency Public Health Services - Maternal, Child, and Family Health Services June 15, 2017 Health Services Advisory Board Meeting
More informationTobacco Control. (Update 2008)
Tobacco Control (Update 2008) CMA POLICY Tobacco is an addictive and hazardous product, and the number one cause of preventable disease and death in Canada. Canada s physicians, who see the devastating
More informationACTION PLAN. Intergovernmental Coordinating Body, Ministry of Finance. Intergovernmental Coordinating Body, Ministry of Finance
ACTION PLAN Strategic goal 1: Reduction of tobacco demand which should reduce the prevalence of smoking in the population Objectives Activity/Action Responsible Party/Implementing Body Deadline Source
More informationCountry profile. Norway
Country profile rway WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 16 June 2003 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationIran (Islamic Republic of)
Country profile Iran (Islamic Republic of) WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 6 November 2005 Socioeconomic
More informationCigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement. Initiative Constitutional Amendment and Statute.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Propositions California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 2016 Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention,
More informationLindsey White. Tobacco Control Program Coordinator
Lindsey White Tobacco Control Program Coordinator History Tobacco Targets Tobacco Products Dangers and Tobacco Tolls The Trust America s Brown Gold World War I and II NAACP Nicotine= Insecticide 50-70mg
More informationPress Coverage of Tobacco Issues as a Component of the SmokeLess States Evaluation
Press Coverage of Tobacco Issues as a Component of the SmokeLess States Evaluation Analysis of news coverage I. Coverage of Tobacco Issues Overall Volume Scope Types of Articles Slant II. Coverage of SmokeLess
More informationCountry profile. Russian Federation. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status
Country profile Russian Federation WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 3 June 2008 Socioeconomic context
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION PROGRAMS EFFECTIVELY REDUCE TOBACCO USE
COMPREHENSIVE TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION PROGRAMS EFFECTIVELY REDUCE TOBACCO USE Tobacco control programs play a crucial role in the prevention of many chronic conditions such as cancer, heart disease,
More informationCountry profile. Chad
Country profile Chad WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 22 June 2004 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 30 January 2006 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION PROGRAMS EFFECTIVELY REDUCE TOBACCO USE
COMPREHENSIVE TOBACCO PREVENTION AND CESSATION PROGRAMS EFFECTIVELY REDUCE TOBACCO USE Tobacco control programs play a crucial role in the prevention of many chronic conditions such as cancer, heart disease,
More informationRaising Tobacco Taxes A Summary of Evidence from the NCI-WHO Monograph on the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control
Raising Tobacco Taxes A Summary of Evidence from the NCI-WHO Monograph on the Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Control Jeremias N. Paul Jr. Coordinator, Tobacco Control Economics (TCE) Prevention of Noncommunicable
More informationCountry profile. Gambia
Country profile Gambia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 16 June 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 18 September 2007 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationLocal Laws to Raise the Minimum Legal Sale Age for all Tobacco Products 21 Years of Age in the North Country Frequently Asked Questions
Local Laws to Raise the Minimum Legal Sale Age for all Tobacco Products 21 Years of Age in the North Country Frequently Asked Questions It s Time to Clear the Air in the North Country Tobacco use remains
More informationTEAM LST LET S STOP TOBACCO
TEAM LST LET S STOP TOBACCO OUR AREA OF CONCERN THE ENVIRONMENT OF OUR TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD The Vietnamese Youth Development Center is located on 166 Eddy Street, in the heart of the Tenderloin neighborhood
More informationDeveloping Public Health Regulations for Legal Marijuana
Developing Public Health Regulations for Legal Marijuana February 11, 2013 RAND Drug Policy Research Center Informing drug policy discussions since 1989 More than 60 researchers in 6 offices in 3 countries
More informationSmoke-free laws are easy. Support rarely differs across party lines.
Smoke-free laws are easy. Support rarely differs across party lines. Avoid making it a partisan or ideological issue. The biggest challenge is downscale men and even a solid majority of that group supports
More informationTEXAS CANCER POLL Released February 18, 2015
Released February 18, 2015 Commissioned by: Conducted by: Public Opinion Strategies is pleased to present the key findings of a statewide telephone survey conducted in Texas. The survey was completed December
More informationWho is Targeting You? The Tobacco Industry Those who want to profit from your smoking
Who is Targeting You? The Tobacco Industry Those who want to profit from your smoking The Tobacco Industry like no other Tobacco is the ONLY legal product sold that is lethal when used exactly as the manufacturer
More informationCountry profile. Trinidad and Tobago
Country profile Trinidad and Tobago WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 27 August 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 19 August 2004 Socioeconomic
More informationTitle: Tobacco taxation policies in the Former USSR countries. Final technical report. July 2013: Location: Kiev, Ukraine
Title: Tobacco taxation policies in the Former USSR countries By: Konstantin Krasovsky, Tatiana Andreeva Final technical report July 2013: Published by: Alcohol and Drug Information Center (ADIC-Ukraine)
More informationProposition 56: Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement
California Initiative Review (CIR) Volume 2016 Fall 2016 Article 7 9-1-2016 Proposition 56: Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement Stella Huynh University
More informationTHE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH
THE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH Abul Barkat, PhD Professor of Economics, University of Dhaka & Chief Advisor (Hon.), HDRC Email: info@hdrc-bd.com Advocacy for Tobacco Taxation
More informationCountry profile. Colombia. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status. Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008
Country profile Colombia WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature t signed Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 10 April 2008 Socioeconomic context Population
More informationProblem Which option Additional option Additional comments definition Yes No change No further observations.
Department of Health, United Kingdom electronic contribution rec. 317 - by Mr Lee McGill lee.mcgill@dh.gsi.gov.uk Question 1 - scope Problem Which option Recommend option Additional comments Yes No change
More informationHealthy People, Healthy Communities
Healthy People, Healthy Communities Public Health Policy Statements on Public Health Issues The provincial government plays an important role in shaping policies that impact both individual and community
More informationReducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Interventions to Increase the Unit Price for Tobacco Products
Reducing Tobacco Use and Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Interventions to Increase the Unit Price for Tobacco Products Task Force Finding and Rationale Statement Table of Contents Intervention Definition...
More information