LANCE R. MCMAHON and CHARLES P. FRANCE

Transcription

1 /02/ $3.00 THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS Vol. 300, No. 3 Copyright 2002 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 4430/ JPET 300: , 2002 Printed in U.S.A. Daily Treatment with Diazepam Differentially Modifies Sensitivity to the Effects of -Aminobutyric Acid A Modulators on Schedule-Controlled Responding in Rhesus Monkeys LANCE R. MCMAHON and CHARLES P. FRANCE Departments of Pharmacology (L.R.M., C.P.F.) and Psychiatry (C.P.F.), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas Received August 14, 2001; accepted December 6, 2001 This article is available online at ABSTRACT The present study examined how daily treatment with the benzodiazepine (BZ) diazepam modifies the effects of positive modulators acting at different sites on the -aminobutyric acid A (GABA A ) receptor complex and negative modulators acting at BZ sites on the receptor complex. GABA A modulators were administered alone or in combination with acute or chronic diazepam to rhesus monkeys (n 4) responding under a multiple fixed ratio (FR/FR) schedule of food presentation and stimulus-shock termination (SST). There was mutual antagonism between the rate-decreasing effects of diazepam (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.) and high efficacy BZ site negative modulators [ethyl -carboline-3-carboxylate ( -CCE), methyl -carboline- 3-carboxylate ( -CCM) and methyl-6,7-dimethoxyl-4-ethyl- carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM)]. Antagonism of -CCE, -CCM, and DMCM by diazepam was markedly reduced in monkeys receiving diazepam daily. In contrast, daily diazepam The GABA A receptor chloride ionophore complex contains different recognition sites at which benzodiazepines (BZs), barbiturates, and neuroactive steroids can modulate GABAmediated chloride flux (for review, see Mehta and Ticku, 1999). Drugs facilitating GABA-mediated chloride flux (e.g., positive GABA A modulators or agonists) at BZ and barbiturate sites are used in medicine to elicit sedation, anxiolysis, muscle relaxation, and anticonvulsant effects (for review, see Woods et al., 1992 ); neuroactive steroid site positive GABA A modulators are being considered for clinical use (Gasior et al., 1999). Drugs inhibiting GABA-mediated chloride flux (e.g., negative GABA A modulators or inverse agonists) elicit anxiety-like behaviors and convulsions. Drugs binding to the complex without altering GABA-mediated chloride flux (e.g., neutral GABA A modulators or antagonists) presumably do Supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant DA C.P.F. is the recipient of a Research Scientist Development Award (DA00211). treatment enhanced the rate-decreasing effects of Ro (ethyl 8-azido-6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5- ]- [1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate) and flumazenil. Chronic diazepam elicited cross-tolerance to the BZ triazolam and not to the barbiturate pentobarbital or the neuroactive steroid pregnanolone. These results suggest that tolerance to the ratedecreasing effects of BZs is not accompanied by cross-tolerance to positive GABA A modulators acting at other sites on the receptor complex. Moreover, changes in sensitivity to negative GABA A modulators during chronic diazepam treatment appeared to be related to negative efficacy and not clearly related to the precipitation of withdrawal for all drugs. These results indicate that changes in sensitivity to the behavioral effects of drugs that act at different sites on the GABA A receptor complex might be especially useful for identifying and characterizing the functional consequences of GABA A receptor heterogeneity. not directly elicit behavioral effects by acting at the receptor complex. Chronic treatment with BZs such as diazepam can lead to tolerance, perhaps via allosteric uncoupling of BZ sites from GABA A receptors or GABA A receptor-mediated chloride channels (Hu and Ticku, 1994). Chronic BZ treatment produces other changes in vitro such as allosteric uncoupling of BZ sites from barbiturate or neuroactive steroid sites (i.e., homologous uncoupling) and uncoupling of barbiturate sites from GABA A receptors (i.e., heterologous uncoupling; Hu and Ticku, 1994; Friedman et al., 1996). It is not clear whether heterologous uncoupling confers cross-tolerance from BZ to barbiturate or neuroactive steroid site positive GABA A modulators. Another consequence of chronic BZ treatment is dependence as indexed by withdrawal signs emerging upon discontinuation of treatment (for review, see Woods et al., 1992). One consequence of BZ dependence is an increased sensitivity to BZ site neutral modulators such as flumazenil, ABBREVIATIONS: GABA, -aminobutyric acid; BZ, benzodiazepine; -CCE, ethyl -carboline-3-carboxylate; -CCM, methyl -carboline-3- carboxylate; CL, confidence limit; DMCM, methyl-6,7-dimethoxyl-4-ethyl- -carboline-3-carboxylate; FR, fixed ratio; SST, stimulus-shock termination; Ro , ethyl 8-azido-6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5- ]-[1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate. 1017

2 1018 McMahon and France an effect that is most likely due to the precipitation of withdrawal (Lukas and Griffiths, 1982; Takada et al., 1989; Sannerud et al., 1991; Gerak and France, 1997). Negative modulators acting at BZ sites also antagonize the behavioral effects of BZ site positive modulators (e.g., Wettstein, 1989; Wettstein et al., 1993; Lelas et al., 2000; McMahon and France, 2001). However, it is not clear whether negative modulators precipitate withdrawal in the same way that neutral modulators precipitate withdrawal (e.g., Ongini et al., 1985; Martin et al., 1995). Moreover, it is not clear how sensitivity to a negative modulator would change during chronic BZ treatment because in BZ-dependent animals, the behavioral effects of neutral modulators are qualitatively similar to the effects of negative modulators in untreated animals. The present study examined whether chronic diazepam treatment confers cross-tolerance to positive modulators acting at different sites on the GABA A receptor complex. This study also examined whether chronic diazepam treatment increases sensitivity to BZ site negative GABA A modulators in a manner similar to that observed for flumazenil. Rhesus monkeys responding under a multiple fixed ratio (FR/FR) schedule of food presentation and stimulus-shock termination (SST) received various GABA A modulators before, during, and after a period of daily diazepam treatment (5.6 mg/kg/day, p.o.). This multiple schedule was chosen because it is sensitive to the withdrawal-precipitating effects of flumazenil and because it has been used to reveal potentially important differences among GABA A modulators (Ator, 1979; Gerak and France, 1997). BZ site negative modulators that vary in efficacy were studied to test whether efficacy differences correlate with changes in sensitivity that occur during chronic diazepam treatment, as has been shown for BZ site positive modulators (Bronson, 1993; Cohen and Sanger, 1994). The negative modulators were the low efficacy BZ Ro , the intermediate efficacy -carboline -CCE, and the higher efficacy -carbolines -CCM and DMCM (Braestrup et al., 1982; Sieghart et al., 1987). The barbiturate pentobarbital and the neuroactive steroid pregnanolone were chosen for study because they are prototypic positive modulators acting at their respective sites. Materials and Methods Subjects. One adult female and three adult male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were housed individually under a 14:10-h light/ dark schedule, maintained at 95% free-feeding weight (range kg) with primate chow (High Protein Monkey Diet; Harlan Teklad, Madison, WI), fresh fruit, and peanuts, and provided water in the home cage. Monkeys had received BZ ligands acutely in a previous study (McMahon and France, 2001). The animals were maintained in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and Guidelines of the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Research Council (Department of Health, Education and Welfare, publication no. (National Institutes of Health) 85-23, revised 1996). Apparatus. During experimental sessions, monkeys were seated in chairs (model R001; Primate Products, Miami, FL) that provided restraint at the neck and placed in ventilated sound-attenuating chambers equipped with a response lever, lights, and a food cup to which pellets could be delivered from a dispenser. Feet were placed in shoes containing brass electrodes to which a brief (250 ms) electric stimulus could be delivered through an a.c. generator. An interface (MedAssociates, St. Albans, VT) connected the chambers to a computer that controlled and recorded experimental events. Procedure. Monkeys responded under a multiple (FR10/FR10) schedule of food presentation and SST. Experimental sessions consisted of two to eight discrete 15-min cycles comprising a 10-min time-out period, during which lights were extinguished and responses had no programmed consequence, followed by the food presentation and SST response periods. Beginning of a 2-min food component was signaled by illumination of a green light above the response lever; 10 lever responses (FR10) resulted in the delivery of a 300-mg banana-flavored pellet (Bio-Serv, Frenchtown, NJ). The green light was extinguished after 2 min or the delivery of 10 food pellets, and for the latter case the remainder of the 2-min food component was a time-out period. The food component was followed by a 0.9-min time-out after which illumination of a red light signaled the scheduled delivery of an electric stimulus every 10 s. Ten lever responses (FR10) extinguished the red light, prevented the electric stimulus, and initiated a 20-s time-out period, after which the red light was again illuminated. A cycle ended after 5 min (including a 2-min food component, a 0.9-min time-out, and a 2.1-min SST component) or after four electric stimulus presentations, whichever occurred first. Training and Testing. For training sessions, saline or sham injections were given during the first minute of the 10-min time-out period (e.g., first minute of the cycle) with the number of cycles varying nonsystematically across days. Training was conducted until stable rates of responding were established during both components, defined as 10 consecutive days with response rates for both components within 20% of the mean rate for those days. Test sessions were conducted twice weekly so long as response rates for both components of the training session that immediately preceded a test were within 20% of the mean rate for the 10 previous training sessions; otherwise, testing was postponed until this criterion was satisfied. During the first cycle of a test session, 0.3 ml of the appropriate vehicle was administered, and on subsequent cycles, increasing doses of a test compound were administered so that the cumulative dose increased by 0.25 or 0.5 log unit per cycle. The number of cycles for a test was determined by the number of cycles required to complete the dose-effect curve (i.e., from an ineffective dose to a dose that resulted in fewer than 10 responses during a food component or in four stimulus presentations during an SST component). Prior to chronic diazepam treatment, cumulative dose-effect curves were determined for pentobarbital, pregnanolone, flumazenil, Ro , -CCE, -CCM, and DMCM; a cumulative dose-effect curve was determined for the BZ site positive modulator triazolam because the duration of action of triazolam is shorter than that of diazepam making triazolam more suitable for acute testing in this study. Due to limited supply, the largest cumulative doses of flumazenil were 10 mg/kg for two monkeys and 3.2 mg/kg for two monkeys. Chronic diazepam treatment proceeded for 72 days with p.o. administration of 5.6 mg/kg 3 h prior to sessions, except for days 55, 57, 60, 69, and 70, when the daily dose of diazepam was administered immediately after sessions. Cumulative dose-effect curves were determined for flumazenil on days 2, 8, 14, 20, 26, and 72 of chronic diazepam treatment. Between days 26 and 72 of chronic diazepam treatment, cumulative dose-effect curves were redetermined for triazolam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, Ro , -CCE, -CCM, and DMCM. During chronic diazepam treatment, cumulative doseeffect curves were also determined for pentobarbital and pregnanolone prior to administration of the daily dose of diazepam to determine whether cross-tolerance was masked by additive effects between the test compound and the daily dose of diazepam. Seven days after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment, a cumulative dose-effect curve was determined a third time for triazolam followed by dose-effect determinations for flumazenil, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, Ro , -CCE, -CCM, and DMCM. In addition, diazepam (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.) was administered acutely prior to cumu-

3 lative doses of -CCE, -CCM, or DMCM, and the results of these tests were compared with those determined for negative modulators after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment. The tests in each phase (before, during, and after chronic diazepam treatment) were conducted in a nonsystematic order with the caveat that tests were alternated for positive and negative modulators. Drugs. The vehicle for oral administration of diazepam was fruit punch combined with suspending agent K (Bio-Serv) in a concentration of 1 g of suspending agent per liter of fruit punch. Tablets containing 10 mg of diazepam (Zenith Laboratories, Inc., Northvale, NJ) were dissolved in vehicle, mixed in a blender, and administered using a 12-gauge drinking needle attached to a 60-cc syringe. To obtain a dose of 5.6 mg/kg diazepam, a standard concentration of diazepam was given in a volume adjusted to individual body weights. The diazepam mixture was prepared immediately before administration. The following drugs were administered s.c. in a volume of 0.01 to 0.1 ml/kg body weight expressed in terms of the forms listed below: diazepam, Ro , -CCE, -CCM, DMCM, and pentobarbital sodium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO); flumazenil (F. Hoffmann LaRoche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland); triazolam (gift from Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI); and pregnanolone (Steraloids, Newport, RI). -CCE, -CCM, DMCM, and triazolam were dissolved in a vehicle comprising 50% ethanol and 50% emulphor. Ro , pentobarbital, and flumazenil were dissolved in a vehicle comprising 40% propylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich), 50% saline, and 10% ethanol. Pregnanolone was dissolved in 45% -cyclodextrin (Sigma-Aldrich) in sterile water. Data Analyses. For individual monkeys, rates of responding for each session were calculated separately for each component of the multiple schedule by averaging rates of responding for all cycles within a training session. Control response rate was defined as the mean rate of the 10 training sessions immediately preceding the first day of daily diazepam treatment. Rates of responding during a test cycle were expressed as a percentage of the control response rate. Because some drugs did not decrease responding to below 75% of control in all monkeys, group averaged data were used to calculate the dose of a compound and 95% confidence limit (CL) required to decrease mean response rate to 75% of control (ED 75 ) under each component of the multiple schedule (Tallarida and Murray, 1987). ED 75 values from test sessions were considered to be significantly different from control when they were not within the control 95% CL. A drug that did not decrease responding to below 75% of control before or after chronic diazepam treatment was considered to have produced a significant effect if an ED 75 could be calculated for the same doses of that drug during chronic diazepam treatment. Daily response rate for the 72 days of chronic diazepam treatment and the 6 days after discontinuation of chronic treatment comprises the average of five saline cycles or the value from the first cycle before administration of a test compound during chronic treatment. Results Effects of GABA A Modulators before Chronic Diazepam Treatment. Control response rates ( S.E.M.) for individual monkeys were , , , and responses/s under the schedule of food presentation, and , , , and responses/s under the schedule of SST. The positive modulators triazolam, pentobarbital, and pregnanolone decreased response rate in each component of the multiple schedule (Figs. 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The ED 75 values (95% CLs) for the food and SST components were 0.08 (0.01, 0.48) and 0.09 (0.01, 3.49) for triazolam, (5.79, 31.43) and (7.85, 30.79) for pentobarbital, and 2.65 (1.26, 5.59) and 2.18 (1.65, 2.87) for pregnanolone, GABA A Modulators in Rhesus Monkeys 1019 Fig. 1. Effects of triazolam on responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E), during (f), and after ( ) chronic diazepam treatment. Abscissae, cumulative dose in mg/kg body weight. Points above V represent the average response rate after administration of vehicle. Ordinates, response rate expressed as a percentage of control rate S.E.M. for three monkeys. Fig. 2. Effects of pentobarbital on responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E) and during (f) chronic diazepam treatment. Open squares ( ) represent effects of pentobarbital determined prior to administration of the daily dose (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.) of diazepam. Data represent mean responding for four monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. respectively (Table 1). The neutral modulator flumazenil did not alter response rate up to a dose of 3.2 mg/kg in four monkeys and had different effects up to 10 mg/kg in two monkeys (Fig. 4; Table 2). In the food component, a dose of 10 mg/kg increased response rate in one monkey and decreased response rate in another monkey; this dose of flumazenil did not alter response rate in the SST component in either monkey. The low efficacy negative modulator Ro decreased response rate in the food component with an ED 75 (95% CL) of 9.78 (2.55, 37.52) and did not alter response rate in the SST component (Fig. 5; Table 3). The high efficacy negative modulators -CCE and -CCM decreased response rate in each component of the multiple schedule (Figs. 6 and 7, respectively); ED 75 values (95% CLs) for the food and SST components were 2.19 (0.29, 16.72) and 1.49 (0.27, 8.06) for -CCE and 0.08 (0.03, 0.23) and 0.26 (0.10, 0.69) for -CCM, respectively (Table 3). The high efficacy negative modulator DMCM decreased response rate in the food component with

4 1020 McMahon and France Fig. 3. Effects of pregnanolone on responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E) and during (f) chronic diazepam treatment. Open squares ( ) represent effects of pregnanolone determined prior to administration of daily dose (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.) of diazepam. Data represent mean responding for four monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. an ED 75 value (95% CL) of 0.98 (0.30, 3.19) and did not alter response rate in the SST component (Fig. 8; Table 3). Effects of GABA A Modulators during Chronic Diazepam Treatment. Across the period of daily diazepam treatment, rate was unaffected or increased slightly in the food component and decreased in the SST component when determined 3 h after diazepam administration (Fig. 9). Rate-decreasing effects in the SST component were maximal on day 5 and evident throughout the 72 days of chronic treatment. Similar effects were obtained when test sessions were conducted before administration of the daily dose of diazepam on days 55, 57, 60, 69, and 70 of chronic treatment (data not shown). Doses of flumazenil that had little or no effect before chronic diazepam treatment markedly decreased response rate on day 2 of chronic treatment. The potency of flumazenil in decreasing responding was similar on days 2, 8, and 14 of chronic diazepam treatment; flumazenil was more potent in the food component compared with the SST component (Table 2). Flumazenil was 2-fold more potent in both components of the multiple schedule on day 20 of chronic treatment compared with flumazenil on previous days of chronic diazepam treatment. A further 2-fold increase in the potency of flumazenil in the food component was observed on day 26 of chronic treatment (Fig. 4; Table 2). Flumazenil decreased responding in both schedule components on the last (72nd) day of chronic diazepam treatment with a potency similar to that determined on days 20 and 26 (Table 2). The triazolam dose-effect curves in each schedule component were shifted approximately 7-fold to the right when determined 3 h after administration of the daily dose of diazepam (Fig. 1); the ED 75 values from these curves were significantly different from those determined from control dose-effect curves (Table 1). In contrast, the pentobarbital dose-effect curves in each schedule component were shifted approximately 3-fold to the left when determined either before or 3 h after administration of the daily dose of diazepam (Fig. 2). With the exception of the ED 75 determined from the curve in the food component before the daily dose of diazepam, the ED 75 values from the pentobarbital dose-effect curves during chronic diazepam treatment were significantly different from those from the control dose-effect curves (Table 1). The pregnanolone dose-effect curves in each schedule component were shifted less than 2-fold to the left when determined 3 h after administration of the daily dose of diazepam (Fig. 3); the ED 75 from the pregnanolone doseeffect curve in the SST component was significantly different from that determined from the control dose-effect curve (Table 1). In contrast, ED 75 values from the pregnanolone doseeffect curves determined before administration of the daily dose of diazepam were not significantly different from those determined from the control dose-effect curves (Fig. 3; Table 1). Ro decreased rate of responding in both schedule components during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 5). A dose of Ro , which did not alter responding before chronic diazepam treatment (3.2 mg/kg), suppressed responding in the food component and markedly decreased the rate in the SST component during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 5). The ED 75 values from the Ro doseeffect curves in each schedule component during chronic diazepam treatment were significantly different from the respective ED 75 values determined from the control doseeffect curves (Table 3). The -CCE dose-effect curves in each schedule component were shifted approximately 5-fold to the left during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 6; Table 3). The TABLE 1 Mean ED 75 values and 95% CLs for rate-decreasing effects of positive GABA A modulators before, during, and after chronic diazepam administration in the food and SST components of the multiple schedule ED 75 (mg/kg) 95% CL Drug Before During After Food SST Food SST Food SST Triazolam a 0.64 b (0.01, 0.48) (0.01, 3.49) (0.12, 3.17) (0.53, 0.78) (0.01, 1.58) (0.01, 0.26) Pentobarbital a 2.92 a,b (5.79, 31.43) (7.85, 30.79) (0.61, 50.39) (0.05, ) (3.80, 69.31) (3.66, 77.64) Pentobarbital DZP after session N.A. N.A a N.A. N.A. (0.51, ) (0.97, 26.27) Pregnanolone a a (1.26, 5.59) (1.65, 2.87) (0.20, 12.73) (0.11, 14.50) (0.80, 10.57) (0.97, 10.60) Pregnanolone DZP after session N.A. N.A N.A. N.A. (1.56, 6.11) (0.99, 7.25) N.A., not applicable; DZP, diazepam. a Significant difference from ED 75 determined before chronic diazepam treatment. b Significant difference from ED 75 determined after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment.

5 GABA A Modulators in Rhesus Monkeys 1021 Fig. 4. Effects of flumazenil on the responding maintained under a multiple schedule of food presentation (left panel) or stimulus-shock termination (right panel) before, during, and after chronic diazepam treatment. Data represent mean responding for four monkeys up to a dose of 3.2 mg/kg, and two monkeys for larger doses. See Fig. 1 for other details. E, before diazepam treatment;, after diazepam treatment; f, during day 26; and Œ, during day 72. TABLE 2 Mean ED 75 values and 95% CLs for rate-decreasing effects of flumazenil before, during, and after chronic diazepam administration in the food and SST components of the multiple schedule Day of Chronic Diazepam Food ED 75 (mg/kg) 95% CL SST Before 10 mg/kg 10 mg/kg Day (0.04, 7.72) (0.21, 4.19) Day (0.01, 57.28) (0.01, ) Day (0.03, 12.83) (0.01, ) Day (0.03, 2.80) (0.17, 1.03) Day (0.02, 0.83) (0.01, 19756) Day (0.01, 5.22) (0.01, ) After 10 mg/kg 10 mg/kg Fig. 5. Effects of Ro on the responding maintained under a multiple schedule of food presentation (left panel) or stimulus-shock termination (right panel) before (E), during (f), and after ( ) chronic diazepam treatment. Data represent mean responding for three monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. -CCM dose-effect curves in each schedule component were not changed during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 7; Table 3). The DMCM dose-effect curve in the food component was shifted 10-fold to the right during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 8); the ED 75 from this curve was significantly different from that determined from the control dose-effect curve (Table 3). DMCM did not alter responding in the SST component during chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 8). Effects of GABA A Modulators after Discontinuation of Chronic Diazepam Treatment. After discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment, responding in the food component was decreased on days 2 and 3 for one monkey, whereas responding in the SST component was decreased on days 2, 3, and 4 in the same monkey and for another monkey. However, the mean response rate for all four monkeys was only slightly decreased on these days (Fig. 9). Sensitivity to pentobarbital and pregnanolone (food component only) did not differ from sensitivity observed before chronic diazepam administration (Table 1). Sensitivity to pregnanolone in the SST component was significantly decreased as evidenced by a 1.5-fold shift to the right in the dose-effect curve compared with sensitivity observed before chronic diazepam treatment (Table 1). Sensitivity to triazolam, flumazenil, -CCM, and DMCM returned to values obtained before chronic diazepam administration (Figs. 1, 4, 7, and 8, respectively; Tables 1 3). The ED 75 from the Ro dose-effect curve in the food component was significantly smaller than that determined before chronic diazepam treatment, although remaining significantly larger than the ED 75 determined during chronic diazepam treatment. The ED 75 values for the Ro doseeffect curves in the SST component determined before and after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment were not different from each other (Fig. 5; Table 3). The ED 75 value from the -CCE dose-effect curve in the food component was significantly smaller (i.e., leftward shift) than the ED 75 from the -CCE dose-effect curve determined before chronic diazepam treatment (Fig. 6; Table 3). Acute Interactions between Diazepam and Negative Modulators. Acute diazepam administration shifted the -CCE dose-effect curve in the SST and not the food component significantly to the right (Fig. 6; Table 4). Acute diazepam administration shifted the -CCM dose-effect curves in each schedule component significantly to the right (Fig. 7; Table 4). Acute diazepam administration shifted the DMCM dose-effect curve in the food component significantly to the right and did not alter the effects of DMCM in the SST component (Fig. 8; Table 4). Discussion The present study examined the effects of chronic diazepam treatment on sensitivity to various different GABA A modulators. Chronic BZ treatment can uncouple barbiturate sites from GABA A -mediated chloride channels (Hu and Ticku, 1994), suggesting that chronic diazepam treatment might confer cross-tolerance to positive modulators acting at non-bz sites on the GABA A receptor complex (e.g., pentobarbital and pregnanolone). Chronic BZ treatment can also increase sensitivity to the neutral modulator flumazenil, an effect that might be due to the precipitation of withdrawal (Lukas and Griffiths, 1982; Takada et al., 1989; Sannerud et al., 1991; Gerak and France, 1997). Changes in sensitivity to flumazenil during chronic diazepam treatment were compared with changes in sensitivity to various negative modu-

6 1022 McMahon and France TABLE 3 Mean ED 75 values and 95% CLs for rate-decreasing effects of negative GABA A modulators before, during, and after chronic diazepam administration in the food and SST components of the multiple schedule ED 75 (mg/kg) 95% CL Drug Before During After Food SST Food SST Food SST Ro mg/kg 0.17 a,b 0.41 a,b 1.47 a 10 mg/kg (2.55, 37.52) (0.01, 2.44) (0.34, 0.51) (0.29, 7.43) -CCE a a 0.37 (0.29, 16.72) (0.27, 8.06) (0.05, 1.55) (0.09, 1.73) (0.06, 1.06) (0.18, 0.80) -CCM (0.03, 0.23) (0.10, 0.69) (0.04, 1.06) (0.05, 5.97) (0.04, 0.33) (0.12, 0.57) DMCM mg/kg a,b 10 mg/kg mg/kg (0.30, 3.19) (0.17, ) (0.28, 6.50) a Significant difference from ED 75 determined before chronic diazepam treatment. b Significant difference from ED 75 determined after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment. Fig. 6. Effects of -CCE on the responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E), during (f), and after ( ) chronic diazepam treatment. Filled triangles ( ) represent effects of -CCE determined after acute administration of diazepam (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.). Data represent mean responding for four monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. Fig. 7. Effects of -CCM on the responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E), during (f), and after ( ) chronic diazepam treatment. Filled triangles ( ) represent effects of -CCM determined after acute administration of diazepam (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.). Data represent mean responding for three monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. lators acting at BZ sites. BZ site negative modulators that vary in efficacy were studied to test whether efficacy differences correlate with changes in sensitivity that occur during chronic diazepam treatment, as has been shown for positive modulators acting at BZ sites (Bronson, 1993; Cohen and Sanger, 1994). Positive GABA A modulators decreased the responding under the multiple schedule with the following order of potency: triazolam pregnanolone pentobarbital. This result is consistent with a number of studies demonstrating that various positive GABA A modulators decrease responding maintained under a variety of operant schedules (e.g., Ator 1979; Wettstein, 1989; Paronis and Bergman 1999; Vanover et al., 1999). Each positive modulator markedly decreased responding with similar potency in the two schedule components. Thus, responding maintained by the two reinforcers (food versus SST) appeared to be similarly affected by these positive GABA A modulators. In contrast to positive modulators, the neutral modulator flumazenil did not alter the responding up to a dose much larger than the dose antagonizing diazepam and other BZs (e.g., Lelas et al., 2000). This result is consistent with the notion that flumazenil does not substantially modify GABA-mediated chloride flux at BZ sites on the receptor complex (e.g., Smith et al., 2001). Unlike positive modulators, the potency of some negative modulators (e.g., -CCM and DMCM) to decrease responding was greater in the food component than in the SST component. The qualitatively different effects of positive and negative GABA A modulators under the multiple schedule are consistent with previous reports on the schedule dependence of some behavioral effects of positive and negative GABA A modulators (Ator, 1979; Corda et al., 1983; Paronis and Bergman 1999). Rate-decreasing effects among BZ site negative modulators appeared to be related to their apparent efficacy in vitro. For instance, Ro decreased responding to 80% of control at a dose (10 mg/kg) larger than the dose antagonizing diazepam and other BZs (Gerak et al., 1998; Lelas et al., 2000). Low efficacy (Mehta and Ticku, 1989) might be responsible for the failure of Ro to significantly modify schedule-controlled responding in nondependent animals in this and previous studies (Suzdak et al., 1986; for exception, see Britton et al., 1988). In contrast, relatively high efficacy might account for the greater potency of -CCE, -CCM, and DMCM to decrease the responding because rate-decreasing effects occurred at the same doses of -CCE and -CCM that antagonized BZs in previous studies (Lelas et al., 2000; McMahon and France, 2001). The greater potency of -CCM compared with -CCE and DMCM corroborates the results of other studies (Corda et al., 1983; Petersen, 1983; Gerak et al., 1998).

7 GABA A Modulators in Rhesus Monkeys 1023 TABLE 4 Mean ED 75 values and 95% CLs for rate-decreasing effects of negative GABA A modulators alone and in combination with acute diazepam under the food and SST components of the multiple schedule ED 75 (mg/kg) 95% CL Drug Control Acute Diazepam Food SST Food SST -CCE a (0.06, 1.06) (0.18, 0.80) (0.18, 2.88) (0.56, 1.32) -CCM a 3.02 a (0.04, 0.33) (0.12, 0.57) (0.08, 7.70) (0.61, 14.95) DMCM mg/kg 10 mg/kg a 10 mg/kg (0.28, 6.50) a Significant difference from control ED 75. Fig. 8. Effects of DMCM on the responding maintained under a multiple (right panel) before (E), during (f), and after ( ) chronic diazepam treatment. Filled triangles ( ) represent effects of DMCM determined after acute administration of diazepam (5.6 mg/kg, p.o.). Data represent mean responding for four monkeys. See Fig. 1 for other details. Fig. 9. The responding maintained under a multiple schedule of food presentation (top panel) or stimulus-shock termination (bottom panel) during daily diazepam treatment and after discontinuation of diazepam treatment. Abscissae, days of chronic diazepam treatment or days after discontinuation of chronic treatment; ordinates, response rate expressed as a percentage of control rate S.E.M. for four monkeys. Daily diazepam treatment appeared to increase responding in the food component and to decrease responding in the SST component throughout the course of chronic diazepam treatment. These effects on responding were small compared with the effects produced by triazolam, pentobarbital, and pregnanolone at the largest doses studied. As shown previously, sensitivity to flumazenil increased during chronic diazepam treatment. Increased sensitivity to flumazenil during BZ treatment is thought to be due to the precipitation of withdrawal and has been used as a measure of BZ dependence (Lukas and Griffiths, 1982; Sannerud et al., 1991; Gerak and France, 1997). Rate-decreasing effects of flumazenil were evident after the second daily dose of diazepam (see also Spealman, 1985), suggesting that diazepam dependence begins to develop early in chronic treatment. The effects of flumazenil in the SST component were relatively stable throughout the course of chronic diazepam treatment, whereas sensitivity to flumazenil in the food component increased during the course of treatment. In contrast to previous studies indicating that tolerance develops to flumazenilprecipitated withdrawal during chronic diazepam treatment (Lamb and Griffiths, 1985), sensitivity to flumazenil was relatively stable over time in this and a previous study that used a comparable procedure (Gerak and France, 1998). Thus, to the extent that rate-decreasing effects of flumazenil during chronic BZ treatment represent BZ withdrawal and, therefore, indirectly BZ dependence, these results suggest that BZ dependence is relatively stable over a period of several weeks. Chronic diazepam treatment elicited cross-tolerance to triazolam, a result consistent with other studies showing tolerance to the effects of BZs on schedule-controlled behavior (Takada et al.; 1989; Sannerud et al., 1993). This crosstolerance could be related to uncoupling of BZ receptors from GABA A receptors or GABA A -mediated chloride channels (Hu and Ticku, 1994). Chronic diazepam treatment did not confer cross-tolerance to pentobarbital or pregnanolone, thereby corroborating the results of previous studies (e.g., Cesare and McKearney, 1980; Reddy and Rogawski, 2000). Collectively, these results suggest that heterologous uncoupling of sites on the GABA A receptor complex induced by chronic BZ treatment might not lead to behavioral cross-tolerance among drugs acting at non-bz sites (Hu and Ticku, 1994). Alternatively, the chronic diazepam treatment in the present study might not have been sufficient to promote heterologous uncoupling. Additional study will be required to determine whether allosteric uncoupling of sites on the GABA A receptor complex is responsible for changes in behavioral sensitivity among drugs acting at these sites. Chronic diazepam treatment differentially modified sensitivity to negative modulators in a manner that appeared to be related to efficacy. Like flumazenil, sensitivity to Ro was enhanced during chronic diazepam administration, an effect most likely due to antagonism of chronic diazepam at BZ receptors (i.e., precipitation of diazepam withdrawal). In contrast, sensitivity to DMCM decreased during chronic diazepam treatment, whereas sensitivity to -CCE and -CCM was unchanged. A previous study in rodents also reported that chronic treatment with the BZ chlordiazepoxide did not alter sensitivity to -CCE while increasing sensitivity to flumazenil (Takada et al., 1989). These results suggest that chronic diazepam treatment can decrease sensitivity to some negative modulators pre-

8 1024 McMahon and France sumably because the effects of these compounds under these conditions are due to negative modulatory actions at the GABA A receptor complex. The positive modulatory effects of diazepam, therefore, might attenuate the negative modulatory effects of some compounds. Striking differences among neutral and negative modulators in diazepam-treated monkeys clearly suggest that precipitation of withdrawal does not contribute identically to the behavioral actions of these compounds. Previous studies have shown that BZ site positive modulators can antagonize negative modulators; however, chronic diazepam did not attenuate the rate-decreasing effects of -CCE and -CCM. This could reflect tolerance to the ability of diazepam to antagonize high efficacy negative modulators, as shown previously for the ability of the BZ lorazepam to antagonize DMCM (Petersen and Jensen, 1987). In support of this notion, acutely administered diazepam antagonized -CCE and -CCM, and produced even greater antagonism of DMCM than observed during chronic treatment. Tolerance to diazepam antagonism of negative modulators could be due to an increased potency of negative modulators in displacing positive modulators from BZ receptors in BZ-tolerant animals (Allan et al., 1992). It is not likely that chronic diazepam treatment conferred cross-tolerance to DMCM since previous studies in rodents have demonstrated increased sensitivity to negative modulators after discontinuation of chronic BZ treatment (Little et al., 1987). Similarly, sensitivity to Ro and -CCE was increased after discontinuation of chronic diazepam treatment in monkeys. Enhanced sensitivity after discontinuation of treatment was selective for these negative modulators insofar as sensitivity to triazolam, pentobarbital, pregnanolone, flumazenil, -CCM, and DMCM was similar to that determined before chronic diazepam treatment. In summary, the present study demonstrates that daily treatment with the BZ diazepam confers cross-tolerance to a positive modulator acting at BZ sites and not to positive modulators acting at other sites on the GABA A receptor complex (e.g., a barbiturate or neuroactive steroid). Moreover, changes in sensitivity to ligands that can antagonize diazepam under other conditions, such as neutral and negative modulators acting at BZ sites, appear to be modified in a manner that is correlated with the efficacy of these ligands. It is not clear to what extent the precipitation of withdrawal per se contributes to the rate-decreasing effects of negative modulators in diazepam-treated monkeys. This question might be resolved in monkeys with other procedures (e.g., drug discrimination) that have been successfully applied to the study of diazepam withdrawal. Acknowledgments We thank Dr. R. J. Lamb for helpful editorial comments and B. Engelhardt and S. Tucker for providing technical assistance. References Allan AM, Baier LD, and Zhang X (1992) Effects of lorazepam tolerance and withdrawal on GABA A receptor-operated chloride channels. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261: Ator NA (1979) Differential effects of chlordiazepoxide on comparable rates of responding maintained by food and shock avoidance. Psychopharmacology 66: Braestrup C, Schmiechen R, Neef G, Nielsen M, and Petersen EN (1982) Interaction of convulsive ligands with benzodiazepine receptors. Science (Wash DC) 216: Britton KT, Ehlers CL, and Koob GF (1988) Is ethanol antagonist Ro selective for ethanol? Science (Wash DC) 239: Bronson ME (1993) Tolerance/cross-tolerance to the discriminative stimulus effects of chlordiazepoxide and bretazenil. Mol Chem Neuropathol 18: Cesare DA and McKearney JW (1980) Tolerance to suppressive effects of chlordiazepoxide on operant behavior: lack of cross tolerance to pentobarbital. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 13: Cohen C and Sanger DJ (1994) Tolerance, cross-tolerance and dependence measured by operant responding in rats treated with triazolam via osmotic pumps. Psychopharmacology 115: Corda MG, Blaker WD, Mendelson WB, Guidotti A, and Costa E (1983) -carbolines enhance shock-induced suppression of drinking in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: Friedman LK, Gibbs TT, and Farb DH (1996) -Aminobutyric acid A receptor regulation: heterologous uncoupling of modulatory site interactions induced by chronic steroid, barbiturate, benzodiazepine, or GABA treatment in culture. Brain Res 707: Gasior M, Carter RB, and Witkin JM (1999) Neuroactive steroids: potential therapeutic use in neurological and psychiatric disorders. Trends Pharmacol Sci 20: Gerak LR, Estupinan LE, and France CP (1998) Ventilatory effects of negative GABA A modulators in rhesus monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 61: Gerak LR and France CP (1997) Repeated administration of flumazenil does not alter its potency in modifying schedule-controlled behavior in chlordiazepoxidetreated rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 131: Hu XJ and Ticku MK (1994) Chronic benzodiazepine agonist treatment produces functional uncoupling of the -aminobutyric acid-benzodiazepine receptor ionophore complex in cortical neurons. Mol Pharmacol 45: Lamb RJ and Griffiths RR (1985) Effects of repeated Ro administration in benzodiazepine-dependent baboons. Eur J Pharmacol 110: Lelas S, Gerak LR, and France CP (2000) Antagonism of the discriminative stimulus effects of positive -aminobutyric acid A modulators in rhesus monkeys discriminating midazolam. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 294: Little HJ, Nutt DJ, and Taylor SC (1987) Bidirectional effects of chronic treatment with agonist and inverse agonists at the benzodiazepine receptor. Brain Res Bull 19: Lukas SE and Griffiths RR (1982) Precipitated withdrawal by a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist (Ro ) after 7 days of diazepam. Science (Wash DC) 217: Martin JR, Jenck F, and Moreau J-L (1995) Comparison of benzodiazepine receptor ligands with partial agonistic, antagonistic or partial inverse agonistic properties in precipitating withdrawal in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 275: McMahon LR and France CP (2001) The negative GABA A modulator -CCM attenuates the behavioral effects of the positive GABA A modulators triazolam and pregnanolone in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 158: Mehta AK and Ticku MK (1989) Benzodiazepine and beta-carboline interactions with GABA A receptor-gated chloride channels in mammalian cultured spinal cord neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 249: Mehta AK and Ticku MK (1999) An update on GABA A receptors. Brain Res Rev 29: Ongini E, Marzanatti M, Bamonte F, Monopoli A, and Guzzon V (1985) A -carboline antagonizes benzodiazepine actions but does not precipitate the abstinence syndrome in cats. Psychopharmacology 86: Paronis CA and Bergman J (1999) Apparent pa 2 values of benzodiazepine antagonists and partial agonists in monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290: Petersen EN (1983) DMCM: a potent convulsive benzodiazepine receptor ligand. Eur J Pharmacol 94: Petersen EN and Jensen LH (1987) Lorazepam and FG 7142 induce tolerance to the DMCM antagonistic effect of benzodiazepine receptor ligands. Brain Res Bull 19: Reddy DS and Rogawski MA (2000) Chronic treatment with the neuroactive steroid ganaxolone in the rat induces anticonvulsant tolerance to diazepam but not to itself. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 295: Sannerud CA, Allen M, Cook JM, and Griffiths RR (1991) Behavioral effects of benzodiazepine ligands in non-dependent, diazepam-dependent and diazepamwithdrawn baboons. Eur J Pharmacol 202: Sannerud CA, Marley RJ, Serdikoff SL, Alastra AJG, Cohen C, and Goldberg SR (1993) Tolerance to the behavioral effects of chlordiazepoxide: pharmacological and biochemical specificity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: Sieghart W, Eichinger A, Richards JG, and Mohler H (1987) Photoaffinity labeling of benzodiazepine receptor proteins with partial inverse agonist [3H]Ro : a biochemical and autoradiographic study. J Neurochem 48: Smith AJ, Alder L, Silk J, Adkins C, Fletcher AE, Scales T, Kerby J, Marshall G, Wafford KA, McKernan RM, and Atack JR (2001) Effect of subunit on allosteric modulation of ion channel function in stably expressed human recombinant -aminobutyric acid A receptors determined using 36 Cl ion flux. Mol Pharmacol 59: Spealman RD (1985) Discriminative-stimulus effects of midazolam in squirrel monkeys: comparison with other drugs and antagonism by Ro J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235: Suzdak PD, Glowa JR, Crawley JN, Schwartz RD, Skolnick P, and Paul SM (1986) A selective imidazobenzodiazepine antagonist of ethanol in the rat. Science (Wash DC) 234: Takada K, Suzuki T, Hagen T, Cook JM, and Katz JL (1989) Behavioral effects of benzodiazepine antagonists in chlordiazepoxide tolerant and non-tolerant rats. Life Sci 44: Tallarida RJ and Murray RB (1987) Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations with Computer Programs, Springer-Verlag, New York. Vanover KE, Edgar DM, Seidel WF, Hogenkamp DJ, Fick DB, Lan NC, Gee KW, and

9 GABA A Modulators in Rhesus Monkeys 1025 Carter RB (1999) Response-rate suppression in operant paradigm as predictor of soporific potency in rats and identification of three novel sedative-hypnotic neuroactive steroids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 291: Wettstein JG (1989) Behavioral studies with the -carboline FG 7142 combined with related drugs in monkeys. Eur J Pharmacol 163: Wettstein JG, Teeple ES, and Morse WH (1993) Combination of buspirone and other drugs with -CCE in monkeys: effects of respiration and behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 44: Woods JH, Katz JL, and Winger G (1992) Benzodiazepines: use, abuse, and consequences. Pharmacol Rev 44: Address correspondence to: Dr. Charles P. France, Department of Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX france@uthscsa.edu