Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle
|
|
- Toby Tucker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 /2014/106/1/6-14 Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas Copyright 2014 Arán Ediciones, S. L. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid Vol. 106, N.º 1, pp. 6-14, 2014 ORIGINAL PAPERS Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle Julio Iglesias-García 1,2, Ihab Abdulkader 3, Jose Lariño-Noia 1,2 and J. Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz 1,2 1 Gastroenterology Department. 2 Foundation for Research in Digestive Diseases (FIENAD). 3 Pathology Department. Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. A Coruña, Spain ABSTRACT Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) is an accurate technique for sampling intraintestinal and extraintestinal lesions. However, cytology possesses certain limitations, which may be overcome if histological specimens are provided to the pathologist. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed 19G histology needle. Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data base including patients who underwent EUS-guided biopsy with the 19G ProCore TM histology needle for the evaluation of intraintestinal or extraintestinal lesions. Samples were obtained after one needle pass, recovered into ThinPrep and processed for histological analysis. Results were compared to the gold standard of surgical histopathology, or global pathological, clinical and radiological assessment, and follow-up in non-operated cases. Results are shown as mean ± SD. Percentage of optimal samples for histological evaluation and the overall diagnostic accuracy were evaluated. Results: 87 patients (mean age 62.9 years, range years, 36 woman) were included. Lesions mean size was 41.6 ± 21.3 mm. 66 lesions (75.9 %) were considered as malignant and 21 (24.1 %) as benign. EUS-guided biopsy was feasible in all cases (100 %). Sample quality was adequate for histological assessment in 82 lesions (94.2 %). In the remaining cases the sample was adequate for cell-block evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy for malignancy were 93.4 %, 100 %, 100 %, 84 %, and 95.4 %, respectively. There were no complications related to the procedure. Conclusion: The EUS-guided biopsy with the 19G histology needle provides with an optimal core sample for histological evaluation allowing a high histopathologic diagnostic accuracy. Key words: Endoscopic ultrasound. Fine needle biopsy. Histology. Iglesias-García J, Abdulkader I, Lariño-Noia J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2014;106:6-14. INTRODUCTION EUS is a sensitive method for detecting intraintestinal and extraintestinal masses and peri-intestinal lymph nodes (1-4). EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has a diagnostic accuracy ranging from 60 % to 90 % (5-7). Cytological evaluation of the samples obtained by FNA allows evaluating cellular findings suggestive of malignancy, like anisonucleosis, nuclear membrane irregularity and nuclear enlargement. However, inflammation causes a reactive and regenerative process leading to cellular changes undistinguishable from well-differentiated neoplasia. Moreover, certain neoplasms such as lymphoma and stromal tumors require histological samples for diagnosis, since tissue architecture and cell morphology are essential in these cases for accurate pathological assessment and immunohistochemical analysis (5,8-10). Whereas FNA only provides cells largely disrupted from their original arrangement, larger-caliber cutting needles allow for core biopsy specimens (11-18). These specimens have been obtained by several routes (percutaneous, intraluminal and surgical) (16-22), and safety and accuracy of cutting biopsy have been previously demonstrated (16,22-24). Various EUS-guided techniques have been explored to retrieve tissue specimens, including FNA and Tru- Received: Accepted: Correspondence: Julio Iglesias-García. Gastroenterology Department. Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela. c/ Choupana, s/n Santiago de Compostela. A Coruña, Spain julio.iglesias.garcia@sergas.es Additional remark: For this trial Cook Medical supported with products. Disclosures: Dr. Julio Iglesias-Garcia and Dr. Ihab Abdulkader are International advisors of Cook-Medical. Dr. Domínguez has acted as International advisor of Pentax-Medical Company.
2 Vol. 106, N.º 1, 2014 Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples 7 obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle Cut needles, with variable success and complication rates (25-32). Of particular interest is the Quick-Core needle, designed to operate through an echoendoscope. EUS-guided use of Quick-Core needle has allowed the safe obtaining of histological samples representative of the target organs (33,34). However, there are certain drawbacks with this needle restricting its use in clinical practice. Most importantly, its diagnostic yield is strongly limited for lesions located in the head of the pancreas due to mechanical friction of the needle firing mechanism ensuing from the bended scope position (35-38). Nowadays a new 19-gauge fine needle biopsy needle (ProCore TM, Cook Endoscopy Inc., Limerick, Ireland) device has been designed. Feasibility, yield and high diagnostic accuracy of this needle have been recently report in a large series of consecutive patients in a multicenter study, but different methodologies were used in each center (39). Aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of this newly developed 19-gauge histology needle in a single center using a homogeneous methodology. Targets included intestinal and extraintestinal mass lesions and peri-intestinal lymph nodes. MATERIAL AND METHODS Design A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of the diagnostic accuracy of the EUS-guided fine needle biopsy with the newly designed 19-gauge histology needle for the evaluation of intraintestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions and/or peri-intestinal lymph nodes was designed. Subjects All patients submitted over a time period of 18 months to the EUS Unit of the Department of Gastroenterology of the Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain for the evaluation of solid, and in which the new 19-gauge histology needle was used, were included in the study. Solid lesions bigger than one centimeter in diameter were finally included. Lesion smaller than 1 cm, cystic lesions and masses with a predominant cystic component, as well as lesions biopsied with on-site cytopathological evaluation were excluded from the study. designed 19-gauge Echotip ProCore High Definition Biopsy Needle, featuring ProCore reverse bevel technology (Fig. 1). The needle is m long, made of stainless steel with a nitinol stylet. The stylet running through the cannula of the needle is matching the tip bevels. The sheath is 5.2 Fr and the reverse bevel length is 4 mm. Tissue acquisition was done according to a well-defined and homogeneous protocol. According to it, and after the target lesion was endosonographically visualized and the region scanned for vessels using color and pulsed Doppler, biopsy was performed either from esophagus, stomach, duodenum or rectum depending on the location of the lesion. The newly designed histology needle was advanced into the target tissue under endosonographic guidance with the stylet fully inside the needle. Once the lesion was penetrated, the stylet was removed and suction was applied for 10 to 20 seconds using a 10 ml syringe while moving the needle to and fro within the lesion 3-4 times. Suction was released before removing the needle. One single needle pass was performed. Tissue samples were recovered in a liquid-based preparation, ThinPrep (Hologic Corp., Bedford, MA) by flushing the needle with 5 cc of saline. All samples were processed at the Pathology Department of our centre for histological analysis. There was no pathologist present in the endoscopy room and biopsy samples were recovered and stored for further processing by the endoscopist. Biopsy samples were evaluated by the same pathologist with particular interest and expertise in evaluating tissue materials obtained via EUS. Samples were embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections of 3-4 µm were stained by the hematoxylin-eosin technique for morphological evaluation and/or different immunohistochemical analysis (cytokeratine, CD56, chromogranin and synaptophisyn for endocrine tumors; CD20, CD3, bcl2, for lymphoma, or cytokeratin and TTF1 for non-small cell lung cancer). If a core for histological evaluation was not obtained, the same material was processed as cellblock for cytological evaluation. Methods EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) was performed using a convex array echoendoscope (Pentax EG- 3870UTK ) by two well-trained endosonographers (J.I.G. and J.L.N). Tissue acquisition was done with the newly Fig. 1. Scheme-image of the new ProCore TM histology needle, showing the notch in which the tissue sample is caught during puncture (permission for use granted by Cook Medical incorporated, Bloomington, Indiana).
3 8 J. Iglesias-García ET AL. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) Gold standard reference method A final diagnosis was defined according to the following reference methods: a) Histology of surgical specimens in cases who underwent surgery; b) a definitely positive pathological finding for malignancy at EUS-guided biopsy sample together with compatible EUS and computed tomography (CT) scan findings for malignant disease in unresectable tumors; and c) EUS and CT scan findings at entry, clinical presentation, and a minimum follow-up period of 6 months including EUS-guided biopsy and CT scan, for final diagnosis of benign disease in cases of benign pathology at initial EUS-guided FNB. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments, and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. All patients provided written informed consent to the study. EUS and EUS-FNA for the evaluation of intraintestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions and/or peri-intestinal lymph nodes are routine procedures in clinical practice. The use of the new histology needle instead of the standard cytology needles adds no risk or inconvenience to the patient (39). Variables evaluated Primary outcome was the percentage of cases in which a correct final histological diagnosis was obtained. The quality of the sample was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The pathologist classified the quality of the samples as follows: Grade 1 - no sample obtained; grade 2 - poor sample, not suitable for histological evaluation, but enough for cytological analysis; grade 3 - good sample, suitable for histological evaluation, but providing an incomplete tissue architecture of the target lesion (i.e. without a real core or when the core was fragmented and difficult to be evaluated); grade 4 - excellent sample, suitable for histological evaluation, providing tissue architecture of the target lesion (i.e. with a real core) (38,39). The percentage of cases in which the pathologist was able to perform an immunohistochemical analysis was also evaluated as secondary outcome. Visibility of the needle during the puncture, ease of FNB needle insertion through the scope, ease of FNB needle removal from the scope, ease of removal the stylet after advancement of the FNB needle in the target lesion, and optical impression of the tissue sample obtained after puncture by the endoscopist were also evaluated. Patients were monitored at the endoscopy unit for two hours after the procedure for the evaluation of complications. Further follow-up was performed by evaluating the electronic clinical record of the patients at days 3, 7 and 15 after the EUS-guided FNB. Electronic clinical record includes any clinical episode of every patient being attended at any hospital of the regional health system, and therefore is a highly reliable tool for checking for any clinical event both related and unrelated with the procedure. Data analysis Results are shown as percentage and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Normally distributed variables are presented as mean with standard deviation and range. A descriptive analysis is performed. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed with the software SPSS 20.0 (Chicago, Illinois). RESULTS Of the 494 EUS-guided biopsies performed over the study period, 87 procedures were performed using the 19-gauge histology needle in 87 patients (mean age 62.9 years, range years, 36 female and 51 male). Mean size of the 87 lesions evaluated was 41.6 ± 21.3 mm. Seven lesions (8.0 %) were smaller than 2 cm. Location and size of the lesions, as well as puncture site are described in table I. Sixty-six lesions (75.9 %) were finally considered as malignant and 21 lesions (24.1 %) as benign. Thirty-one of these patients were previously reported as part of a multicenter trial (38). Final diagnosis was based on surgical specimens in 24 cases (18 malignant and 6 benign lesions). In 48 cases final diagnosis of unresectable malignant tumors was based on the cytological and/or histological findings after EUS-biopsy with definite proof of malignancy, together with compatible EUS and CT scan findings. Finally, in 15 cases without proof of malignancy at initial EUS-guided biopsy, final diagnosis was based on compatible EUS and CT scan findings for benign disease, clinical presentation, and a follow-up time of 6.6 months (range 6-8), including EUS-FNA and CT scan at the end of follow-up. A final diagnosis was provided in all 87 cases (100 %), and in 83 of them (95.4 %; 95 %CI %) this diagnosis proved to be correct according to the gold standard. Table II shows the percentage of correct diagnosis. According to lesion size, EUS-FNB allowed diagnosing accurately 6 out of 7 tumors smaller than 2 cm (85.7 %; 95 %CI ), and 77 out of 80 tumors 2 cm in size (96.2 %; 95 %CI ) (p = 0.283). Detailed information regarding the diagnosis based on the gold standard and on the EUS-FNB is provided in table III. Diagnostic accuracy of the FNB with the evaluated needle for the detection of malignancy is shown in table IV. When evaluating the sample optically after the needle content was flushed into ThinPrep, a tissue core could be observed in 76 cases (87.3 %); a tissue core mixed with blood in 10 cases (11.5 %), and scarce sample in 1 case (1.2 %). A sample suitable for pathological evalua-
4 Vol. 106, N.º 1, 2014 Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples 9 obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle Lesion location Pancreatic tumor Head Body Tail Mediastinal lymph nodes Station 2 Station 4L Station 7 Station 9 Intraabdominal lymph nodes Celiac axis Peri-pancreatic (body) Peri-gastric Table I. Lesion location, size, and puncture site of the 87 cases included in the study n * Size (mm) (mean ± SD) 46.4 ± ± ± and ± ± ± ± Puncture site Transduodenal Transgastric Transgastric Transesophageal Transgastric Subepithelial tumor (stomach) ± 21.4 Transgastric Left suprarenal gland mass ± 25.7 Transgastric Mediastinal mass ± 15.2 Transesophageal Intraabdominal masses Perigastric Periduodenal ± ± Perirectal lesion 60 Transrectal Diffuse pancreatic enlargement --** Transgastric Total ± 21.3 Transgastric Transduodenal (3 rd portion) *In these cases mean ± SD cannot be calculated because of being isolated cases. **In this case, size is not included because it was not a mass, but a diffuse alteration of the pancreas; biopsy of pancreatic body was performed from the stomach. tion was obtained from 86 lesions (98.8 %). Sample quality according to the pathologist was adequate for full histological assessment in 82 lesions (94.2 %) (Table II and figure 2). In the remaining cases the sample was adequate for cytological evaluation (processed as cell-block). The pathologist classified the quality of the samples as follows: Grade 1 in one case (1.2 %); grade 2 in 4 cases (4.6 %); grade 3 in 15 cases (17.2 %); and grade 4 in 67 cases (77 %). EUS-guided biopsy was technically feasible in all 87 cases (100 %) and through all different locations (esophagus, stomach, duodenum and rectum). There were no complications related to the technique. The biopsy device was easy to insert into the scope in all 87 cases (100 %). The needle emerged from the scope easily in 75 cases (86.2 %), with difficulty in 11 cases (12.6 %), and with great difficulty in one case (1.2 %). This appeared to be only a problem when punctures were performed through the duodenum (60 %) with the scope in a bended position, compared to other locations (60 % vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.001). Removing the stylet after puncturing the lesion was easy in 73 cases (83.9 %), hard in 12 cases (13.8 %), and very hard in 2 cases (2.3 %). Difficulties in removing the stylet was mainly related to punctures performed through the duodenum, compared to other locations (80 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.001). The visibility of the needle was judged as optimal in all 87 cases (100 %) (Fig. 3). Fig. 2. Histological tissue preparation of a lymphoma by EUS-FNB, with specific staining for CD20 (x 20).
5 10 J. Iglesias-García ET AL. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) Table II. Indications for EUS-FNB, percentage of adequate histology sample and diagnostic accuracy Lesion n Adequate histology sample (n) (%)* Correct diagnosis (n) (%)* Pancreatic tumor 33 31/33 (93.9 %; 95 %CI ) Mediastinal lymph nodes 22 21/22 (95.4 %; 95 %CI ) Intraabdominal lymph nodes 7 6/7 (85.7 %; 95 %CI ) Subepithelial tumor 6 6/6 Left suprarenal gland mass 6 6/6 Mediastinal mass 6 6/6 Intraabdominal masses 5 4/5 (80.0 % 95 %CI ) Perirectal lesion 1 1/1 (100 %; 95 %CI ) Diffuse pancreatic enlargement 1 1/1 (100 %; 95 %CI ) Total 87 82/87 (94.2 % 95 %CI ) 33/33 (100 %; 95 %CI ) 21/22 (95.4 %; 95 %CI ) 6/7 (85.7 %; 95 %CI ) 6/6 5/6 (83.3 %; 95 %CI ) 6/6 4/5 (80.0 % 95 %CI ) 1/1 (100 %; 95 %CI ) 1/1 (100 %; 95 %CI ) 83/87 (95.4 %; 95 %CI ) *Adequate histology sample corresponds to the presence of a real core, suitable for histological evaluation. Correct diagnosis corresponds to the result of both histological and cytological evaluation. CI = Confidence interval. DISCUSSION The present study shows that an adequate tissue sample for full histological evaluation can be obtained in almost every patient from a variety of lesions with the use of a newly designed EUS 19G histology needle. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the pathological evaluation for the detection of malignancy of the tissue obtained by this needle was of 95.4 %. EUS-guided tissue sampling has emerged as a valuable technique for many indications (4). Conventional EUS- FNA has certain limitations. Sensitivity significantly decreases by % without an on-site pathologist to evaluate the sample obtained during the procedure (40-42). Without on-site evaluation, the recommended number of passes is 5-7 for solid pancreatic lesions and 2-3 for lymph nodes (34,40,41). However, the on-site pathologist allows reducing the number of needle passes and increasing the diagnostic accuracy of the EUS-guided FNA (42). For pancreatic tumors, additional needles and punctures are needed in 15 % of cases, increasing the overall procedural time (9). The lack of cellular arrangement and preserved tissue architecture in cytology samples limits the possibility of making an adequate diagnosis in a relevant proportion of cases (37). In fact, the yield of cytology in certain tumors such as lymphoma, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, and stromal tumors is limited. In this setting, immunohistochemistry is required for final diagnosis and tumor subtyping. Sensitivity of EUS-FNA is also uniformly poor when performed in certain anatomic locations such as thickened gastrointestinal wall or focal intramural lesions (5,43). In order to avoid these problems related to cytological evaluation, several attempts have been undertaken to obtain EUS-guided core tissue specimens for histopathological analysis. Initial attempts were associated with the use of both large caliber (18-21-gauge) needles (25,26) and the standard 22-gauge needle (28). Binmoeller et al. (26) were able to obtain adequate tissue core specimens in 40 out of 45 patients with pancreatic masses by using an 18-gauge needle, but sensitivity for detection of malignancy was only 53 %. On the other hand, we were able to obtain an adequate tissue sample for histological diagnosis of pancreatic masses in 95 % of patients after EUS-FNA by recovering the pancreatic EUS-FNA specimen by injecting saline through the needle (28). Three studies have been able to obtain adequate histological samples by using the 19-gauge standard cytology needle. Yasuda et al. (29) could obtain histological samples with the standard needle in almost every evaluated patient, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 98 %, but by doing more than one pass. In addition, only FNA from lymph nodes were included in that study, what cannot be directly compared to pancreatic lesions (29). In our series, we
6 Vol. 106, N.º 1, 2014 Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples 11 obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle Table III. Detail information on the final diagnosis of lesions included in the study as well as the diagnosis based on the endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy with the new histology needle. Number of patients with each diagnosis is shown in brackets Final diagnosis according to gold-standard Lesion (number of patients) Pancreatic tumor - Adenocarcinoma (25) - Inflammatory mass (4) - Neuroendocrine tumor (2) - Anaplastic carcinoma (1) - Lymphoma (1) Mediastinal lymph nodes - Reactive lymph nodes (1) - Non necrotizing granulomatous inflammation (13) - Lymphoma (2) - Oat-cell (3) - Epidermoid tumor (2) - Renal cancer (1) Intraabdominal lymph nodes - Adenocarcinoma (3) - Hepatocellular carcinoma (1) - Lymphoma (2) - Reactive lymph node (1) Subepithelial tumor (stomach) - Epidermoid metastasis (1) - GIST (3) - Leiomyoma (1) Left suprarenal gland mass - Adenocarcinoma (2) - Oat cell (2) - Epidermoid tumor (1) - Poorly differentiated cancer (1) Mediastinal mass - Epidermoid tumor (1) - Paraganglioma (1) - Oat-cell (1) - Non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (1) - Fusiform cell carcinoma (1) Intraabdominal masses - Fibromatosis (1) - Adenocarcinoma (3) - Undifferentiated carcinoma (1) EUS-FNB diagnosis (number of patients) - Adenocarcinoma (25) - Inflammatory mass (4) - Neuroendocrine tumor (2) - Anaplastic carcinoma (1) - Lymphoma (1) - Reactive lymph nodes (2) - Non necrotizing granulomatous inflammation (13) - Lymphoma (2) - Oat-cell (2) - Epidermoid tumor (2) - Renal cancer (1) - Adenocarcinoma (3) - Hepatocellular carcinoma (1) - Lymphoma (1) - Reactive lymph node (2) - Epidermoid metastasis (1) - GIST (3) - Leiomyoma (1) - Oat cell (2) - Epidermoid tumor (1) - Poorly differentiated cancer (1) - Non diagnostic (1) - Epidermoid tumor (1) - Paraganglioma (1) - Oat-cell (1) - Non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma (1) - Fusiform cell carcinoma (1) - Fibromatosis (1) - Adenocarcinoma (3) - No sample (1) Perirectal lesion - Fibroid solid tumor (1) - Fibroid solid tumor (1) Diffuse pancreatic enlargement - Autoimmune pancreatitis (1) - Autoimmune pancreatitis (1) have not only included lymph nodes from various locations (obtaining a similar accuracy with less passes), but also 33 pancreatic lesions. Larghi et al. (30) developed a technique for tissue acquisition by removing the stylet before needle insertion into the EUS working channel to increase flexibility. With this method adequate samples were obtained in 97.5 % of the cases (similar to the present study), being successful in 98.9 %, and with an overall accuracy over 90 %. However, authors needed a mean of 2.8 passes. Even more, the technique described can be associated with more complications since removal of the stylet can be associated with a bending of the needle during the puncture. Finally, Stavropoulos et al. (31) were able to perform a EUS-guided liver biopsy by using a 19-gauge needle in 22 patients. They obtained adequate liver cores in 91 % of patients, with a median specimen length of 36.9 mm. Authors needed a median of 2 passes to obtain these results, whereas in our experience, only one pass was needed. Up to now, the most widely used needle for obtaining histological samples has been the Quick-Core needle (32-34,38). Although biopsy with Quick-Core needle has no
7 12 J. Iglesias-García ET AL. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) Table IV. Overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with the newly designed 19-gauge histology needle (95 %CI) 93.4 % (95 %CI: ) Sensitivity (62/66) Specificity 100 % (95 %CI: ) (21/21) Positive predictive value 100 % (95 %CI: ) (62/62) Negative predictive value 84 % (95 %CI: ) (21/25) Overall accuracy 95.4 % (95 %CI: ) (83/87) clear advantage over EUS-FNA in terms of overall sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy, it does provide with a more specific diagnosis in selected cases with less needle passes (29,37,44). A combination of EUS-biopsy with Quick- Core needle and EUS-FNA has shown a higher overall diagnostic yield than any of the two needles alone (45-47). The overall accuracy of EUS-biopsy in these later studies ranges from 61 % to 84 %. Contrarily to the Quick-Core needle, the presence of the reverse bevel technology in the new histology needle evaluated in the present study allows obtaining a core by cutting the tissue in each to and fro movements during one single needle pass. First results with this new histology needle regarding feasibility, yield and diagnostic accuracy have been described in a multicenter study (38). Published data are comparable, or even better, to those described with the previous needles, both cytology and Quick-Core. Adequate sample for full histological evaluation was obtained in 89.5 % of the evaluated lesions, and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 85.9 %. In our study, we have been able to obtain an adequate sample for histological evaluation in all lesions but one, with an excellent sample, providing real tissue architecture in 77 % of cases. This was associated with a very high diagnostic accuracy (95.4 %), improving the previously reported diagnostic yield of standard cytology (5-7) and other biopsy needles (44-46). As a relevant issue, these data were obtained after performing only one pass into the target lesion. Although in the present study we have used 19G histology needles, thinner needles (22G and 25G), which are also commercially available, may be especially useful for lesions with a difficult access (e.g. from the second portion of the duodenum) and with the echoendoscope in a bended position. Another important issue is that this high diagnostic accuracy was obtained from all sorts of lesions. Similar to the previous multicenter study (39) we could correctly diagnose and sub-classify different types of lymphomas, subepithelial tumors, benign lymph nodes (sarcoidosis Fig. 3. EUS-FNB of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma, located at pancreatic body and tail. The needle and needle tip are well visible. vs. tuberculosis) and pancreatic solid tumors (metastasis, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and/or autoimmune pancreatitis). This illustrates the potential benefit and impact on patient management of this novel histology needle. An additional advantage of this device is that overcomes certain limitations described with the use of the Quick-Core needle. Due to the rigidity of the needle that limits the degree of the echoendoscope tip deflection required to bring the target lesion into an adequate position for puncture, the diagnostic yield of the Quick-Core needle is strongly limited for lesions that should be punctured from the duodenum (32,35,37,38). Also, the bended scope position induces considerable friction within the needle firing mechanism that may impair its proper function. With the newly designed Pro-Core TM needle, puncturing from a duodenal position appears to be easier. In the previous multicenter study (38), puncturing from the duodenum was feasible in 94.3 % of the cases and in our series this was possible in all cases. However, puncturing from a duodenal position still remains more difficult and in some cases the needle should be pushed out of the scope into the stomach before advancing the scope into the duodenum. EUS-FNB through the esophagus, stomach and rectum was easy and uneventful in all cases. A critical point in the present study is the use of a welldefined gold-standard reference method. Ideally, histology from surgical specimen should be used as gold standard. However, this cannot be obtained for ethical reasons in patients in whom surgery is not indicated. In these specific cases, either a positive FNB result for malignancy together with EUS and CT findings of unresectable tumor, or a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months with repeated imaging procedures (EUS and CT) and EUS-FNA for benign lesions were used. The inclusion of the EUS-guided biopsy as one of the diagnostic criterion of the reference method is a weakness of the present study. In this way, ac-
8 Vol. 106, N.º 1, 2014 Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples 13 obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle curacy data can be overestimated. Nevertheless, the information provided by the clinical evaluation and imaging procedures at inclusion and after follow-up in non-operated cases allowed us to properly classify these lesions, thus minimizing the potential bias. It is also important to point out that this is a single center study, and that both endosonographers and the pathologist are experts in EUSguided FNA and in the evaluation of samples obtained by this procedure. This may clearly play a role in the high diagnostic accuracy obtained. Diagnostic accuracy of EUS- FNB with this 19G histology needle was not significantly influenced by the lesion size, although the number of lesions smaller than 2 cm included in the study does not allow us to draw definite conclusions. Safety of EUS-FNA is well established (48) and complication rates range from 1 % to 2.5 % (49). Small series have reported complication rates of EUS-guided Quick- Core biopsy ranging from 2 % to 4 %, with the largest study showing a complication rate of 2.4 % (38). One concern with this newly designed needle is the risk of contamination of the surrounding tissues during puncture. This is especially true when puncturing lesions smaller that 1 cm, since the needle hole is located between 5 mm and 9 mm from the tip of the needle. In the present study the smallest lesions included were 12 mm in size. In our present series of 87 cases there were no complications associated to the procedure. Therefore, the use of EUS-FNB needle seems as safe as the standard FNA or Quick-Core needle. In conclusion, performing a EUS-guided biopsy with the newly designed Pro-Core TM needle is safe and accurate for histopathology diagnosis of intraintestinal and extraintestinal mass lesions. It offers the possibility to obtain a core sample for histological evaluation in the majority of cases, with an overall diagnostic accuracy of over 95 %. REFERENCES 1. Chang KJ. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) in the USA (abstract). Endoscopy 1998;30:A Rösch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography. British Journal of Surgery 1997;84: Hawes RH. Endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2000;10: Erickson RA. EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60: Wiersema MJ, Vilmann P, Giovannini M, Chang KJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy: Diagnostic accuracy and complication assessment. Gastroenterology 1997;112: Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, Ikenberry SO, Lehman GA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using linear array and radial scanning endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45: Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 2001;134: Ribeiro A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM, Wang KK, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration combined with flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry in the diagnosis of lymphoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53: Erickson RA, Sayage-Rabie L, Beissner RS. Factors predicting the number of EUS-guided fine-needle passes for diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51: Mesa H, Stelow EB, Stanley MW, Mallery S, Lai R, Bardales RH. Diagnosis of non-primary pancreatic neoplasms by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31: Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, Giusti G. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy. A multicentre retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol 1986;2: Brandt KR, Charboneau JW, Stephens DH, Welch TJ, Goellner JR. CTand US-guided biopsy of the pancreas. Radiology 1993;187: Welch TJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Stephens DH. CT-guided biopsy: Prospective analysis of 1,000 procedures. Radiology 1989;171: Harrison BD, Thorpe RS, Kitchener PG, McCann BG, Pilling JR. Percutaneous Trucut lung biopsy in the diagnosis of localized pulmonary lesions. Thorax 1984;39: Ingram DM, Sheiner HJ, Shilkin KB. Operative biopsy of the pancreas using the Trucut needle. Aust N Z J Surg 1978;48: Zinzani PL, Colecchia A, Festi D, Magagnoli M, Larocca A, Ascani S, et al. Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy is effective in the initial diagnosis of lymphoma patients. Haematologica 1998;83: Radhakrishnan V. Transrectal Tru-cut biopsy of the prostate using a protective sheath. Br J Urol 1994;73: Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: A prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol 1998;160: Durup Scheel-Hincke J, Mortensen MB, Pless T, Hovendal CP. Laparoscopic four-way ultrasound probe with histologic biopsy facility using a flexible Tru-cut needle. Surg Endosc 2000;14: Indinnimeo M, Cicchini C, Stazi A, Mingazzini P, Ghini C, Pavone P. Trans anal full thickness Tru-cut needle biopsies in anal canal tumors after conservative treatment. Oncol Rep 1998;5: Sada PN, Ramakrishna B, Thomas CP, Govil S, Koshi T, Chandy G. Transjugular liver biopsy: a comparison of aspiration and trucut techniques. Liver 1997;17: Chau TN, Tong SW, Li TM, To HT, Lee KC, Lai JY, et al. Transjugular liver biopsy with an automated Trucut-type needle: comparative study with percutaneous liver biopsy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14: Nyman RS, Cappelen-Smith J, Brismar J, von Sinner W, Kagevi I. Yield and complications in ultrasound-guided biopsy of abdominal lesions. Comparison of fine-needle aspiration biopsy and 1.2-mm needle core biopsy using an automated biopsy gun. Acta Radiologica 1995;36: Bocking A, Klose KC, Kyll HJ, Hauptmann S. Cytologic versus histologic evaluation of needle biopsy of the lung, hilum and mediastinum. Sensitivity, specificity and typing accuracy. Acta Cytologica 1995;39: Binmoeller KF, Thul R, Rathod V, Henke P, Brand B, Jabusch HC, Soehendra N. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, 18-gauge, fine needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas using a 2.8 mm channel convex array echoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47: Harada N, Kouzu T, Arima M, Isono K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided histologic needle biopsy: Preliminary results using a newly developed endoscopic ultrasound transducer. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44: Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Muñoz JE, Lozano-Leon A, Abdulkader I, Lariño-Noia J, Antunez J, et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasoundguided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13: Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S, Iwashita T, Kojima Y, Yamada T, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy 2006;38: Larghi, A, Verna EC, Ricci R, Seerden TC, Galasso D, Carnuccio A, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74: Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Z, Harris MD, Pitea TC, Turi GK, et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:310-8.
9 14 J. Iglesias-García ET AL. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid) 31. Wiersema MJ, Levy MJ, Harewood GC, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Jondal ML, Wiersema LM. Initial experience with EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsy of perigastric organs. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56: Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57: Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62: Jenssen C, Dietrich CF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology An overview. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 2009;23: Larghi A, Verna EC, Stavropoulos SN, Rotterdam H, Lightdale CJ, Stevens PD. EUS-guided trucut needle biopsies in patients with solid pancreatic masses: A prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59: Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, Roberts S, Wildi S, Hawes RH, et al. Comparison of EUS guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2004;36: Wahnschaffe U, Ullrich R, Mayerle J, Lerch MM, Zeitz M, Faiss S. EUS-guided Trucut needle biopsies as first-line diagnostic method for patients with intestinal or extraintestinal mass lesions. Surg Endosc 2009;23: Thomas T, Kaye PV, Ragunath K, Aithal G. Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided Trucut biopsy: A large tertiary referral center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104: Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS-histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73: Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration: A cytopathologist s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120: Kulesza P, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: Sampling, pitfalls and quality management. Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5: Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Muñoz JE, Abdulkader I, Lariño-Noia J, Eugenyeva E, Lozano-Leon A, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106: Williams DB, Sahai AV, Aabakken L, Penma ID, van Velse A, Webb J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: A large single center experience. Gut 1999;44: Saftiou A, Villman P, Guldhammer SB, Georgescu CV. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided trucut biopsy add significant information to EUS-fine needle aspiration in selected patients: A prospective study. Scandivanian J Gastroenterol 2007;42: Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, Deheragoda M, Pereira SP. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: A prospective study. Cytopathology 2006;17: Storch I, Shah M, Turner R, Donna E, Ribeiro A. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 2008;22: Aithal GP, Anagnostopoulos GK, Tam W, Dean J, Zaitoun A, Kocjan G, et al. EUS-guided tissue sampling: Comparison of dual sampling (trucut biopsy plus FNA) with sequential sampling (trucut biopsy and then FNA as required). Endoscopy 2007;39: Adler DG, Jacobson BC, Davila RE, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi WA, et al. ASGE guideline: Complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61: Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Varadajulu S, Wilcox CM. Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:622-9.
Feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and biopsy (FNB) with a new slim linear echoendoscope
1130-0108/2015/107/6/359-365 Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas Copyright 2015 Arán Ediciones, S. L. Rev Esp Enferm Dig (Madrid Vol. 107, N.º 6, pp. 359-365, 2015 ORIGINAL PAPERS Feasibility of
More informationImpact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses
PO Box 2345, Beijing 100023, China World J Gastroenterol 2007 January 14; 13(2): 289-293 World Journal of Gastroenterology ISSN 1007-9327 wjg@wjgnet.com 2007 The WJG Press. All rights reserved. RAPID COMMUNICATION
More informationTitle: EUS-GUIDED FNA: HOW DO I INCREASE THE YIELD? Session No.: 7
Title: EUS-GUIDED FNA: HOW DO I INCREASE THE YIELD? Session No.: 7 Name: Tomas Hucl Institution: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Country: Czech
More informationEUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with and without Trucut Biopsy of Pancreatic Masses
ORIGINAL ARTICLE EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration with and without Trucut Biopsy of Pancreatic Masses Syed Mubashir Shah, Afonso Ribeiro, Joe Levi, Merce Jorda, Caio Rocha-Lima, Danny Sleeman, Kara Hamilton-Nelson,
More informationMATERIALS AND METHODS INTRODUCTION
Gut and Liver, Vol. 10, No. 1, January 2016, pp. 51-57 ORiginal Article Assessment of Factors Affecting the Usefulness and Diagnostic Yield of Core Biopsy Needles with a Side Hole in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided
More information25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy
THIEME E63 25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy Authors Georgios Mavrogenis 1, 2, Birgit Weynand
More informationORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abdul Haseeb, Linda Jo Taylor, Douglas G. Adler. University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annals of Gastroenterology (2018) 31, 1-5 Comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided core biopsies of solid pancreatic and extrapancreatic lesions: a large single-operator experience with
More informationAn experimental study to assess the best maneuver when using a reverse side-bevel histology needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy
E6 THIEME An experimental study to assess the best maneuver when using a reverse side-bevel histology needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy Authors Institution Akane Yamabe, Atsushi Irisawa, Goro Shibukawa,
More informationEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides high-resolution
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2010;139:1172 1180 Quantitative Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography: An Accurate Method for the Differentiation of Solid Pancreatic Masses JULIO IGLESIAS GARCIA,*, JOSE LARINO NOIA,*, IHAB
More informationRapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided. fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses.
Submit a Manuscript: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/ Help Desk: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/helpdesk.aspx DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9451 World J Gastroenterol 2014 July 28; 20(28): 9451-9457 ISSN 1007-9327 (print)
More informationProspective evaluation of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic mass lesions
Prospective evaluation of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic mass lesions Authors M.H. Larsen 1,C.W.Fristrup 1, S. Detlefsen 2,M.B.Mortensen 1 Institutions 1 Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC), Department
More informationOriginal Article ABSTRACT
Original Article A Multicenter comparative trial of a novel EUS guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore ) with the 22 gauge needle in patients with solid pancreatic mass lesions Mariam Naveed, Ali A. Siddiqui
More informationEUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract
Original article EUS-guided sampling with 25G biopsy needle as a rescue strategy for diagnosis of small subepithelial lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract Authors Filippo Antonini 1, Sara Giorgini
More informationEsophageal seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a mediastinal tumor
Esophageal seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of a mediastinal tumor Authors Kensuke Yokoyama 1,JunUshio 1,NorikatsuNumao 1, Kiichi Tamada 1, Noriyoshi Fukushima 2, Alan
More informationProspective randomized comparison of a 22G core needle using standard versus capillary suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses
Prospective randomized comparison of a 22G core needle using standard versus capillary suction for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses Authors Brian R. Weston 1, William A. Ross 1, Manoop S.
More informationGuideline. 1. Introduction! 2. Methods!
190 Guideline Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline Authors
More informationProspective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy Device for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Lesions
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Clin Endosc 2018;51:576-583 https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.053 Print ISSN 2234-2400 On-line ISSN 2234-2443 Open Access Prospective Assessment of the Performance of a New Fine Needle Biopsy
More informationUse and Abuse of Onsite Adequacy for EUS-FNA of the Pancreas
Use and Abuse of Onsite Adequacy for EUS-FNA of the Pancreas Nirag Jhala MD Director of Cytopathology Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine Surgical Pathologist- GI Subspecialty Dept of Path and Lab Medicine
More informationAppendix 9: Endoscopic Ultrasound in Gastroenterology
Appendix 9: Endoscopic Ultrasound in Gastroenterology This curriculum is intended for clinicians who perform endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in gastroenterology. It includes standards for theoretical
More informationFeasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study
Kim et al. BMC Gastroenterology (2018) 18:151 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0880-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling:
More informationAbstract. Introduction. Salah Abobaker Ali
Sensitivity and specificity of combined fine needle aspiration cytology and cell block biopsy versus needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of sonographically detected abdominal masses Salah Abobaker Ali
More informationSuspicious Cytologic Diagnostic Category in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided FNA of the Pancreas: Follow-Up and Outcomes
Suspicious Cytologic Diagnostic Category in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided FNA of the Pancreas: Follow-Up and Outcomes Evan A. Alston, MD 1 ; Sejong Bae, PhD 2 ; and Isam A. Eltoum, MD, MBA 1 BACKGROUND:
More informationResearch Article The Utility of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Suspected Pancreatic Cancer
Gastroenterology Research and Practice Volume 2010, Article ID 268290, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2010/268290 Research Article The Utility of Repeat Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Suspected
More informationJulio Iglesias-García 1, Björn Lindkvist 2, José Lariño-Noia 1 and J. Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz 1
1130-0108/2012/104/6/315-321 REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS Copyright 2012 ARÁN EDICIONES, S. L. REV ESP ENFERM DIG (Madrid) Vol. 104. N. 6, pp. 315-321, 2012 POINT OF VIEW The role of endoscopic
More informationEFSUMB EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF SOCIETIES FOR ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY Building a European Ultrasound Community
MINIMUM TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PRACTICE OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND IN EUROPE Appendix 9: Endoscopic Ultrasound in Gastroenterology This curriculum is intended for clinicians who perform endoscopic ultrasonography
More informationOriginal Article. Key words: Cytology, fine-needle aspiration (FNA), pancreatic cancer
Original Article Effect of the time of day and queue position in the endoscopic schedule on the performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic
More informationExpect Slimline (SL) Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle EXPANDED INDICATIONS AVAILABLE IN THE U.S. WITH
Expect Slimline (SL) Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle AVAILABLE IN THE U.S. WITH EXPANDED INDICATIONS Expect Slimline (SL) Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle Expect Slimline (SL) Endoscopic
More informationA randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy *
E497 A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy * Authors A. Aziz Aadam 1, Sachin Wani 2, Ashley Amick 1, Janak
More informationFine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Solid Pancreatic Masses: Comparison of CT and Endoscopic Sonography Guidance
Comparison of Guidance Techniques for Pancreatic Mass Biopsy Abdominal Imaging Original Research A C D E M N E U T R Y L I A M C A I G O F I N G Sukru Mehmet Erturk 1 Koenraad J. Mortelé 1 Kemal Tuncali
More informationExpect Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle
Expect Endoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle GLOBAL TECHNIQUE SPOTLIGHT CASES PRESENTED BY: Krishnavel V. Chathadi, MD Therapeutic Endoscopist, BJC Medical Group Missouri Baptist Medical Center St. Louis,
More informationROSE in EUS guided FNA of Pancreatic Lesions
ROSE in EUS guided FNA of Pancreatic Lesions Guy s Hospital, London, 16 April 2018 Laxmi Batav Imperial College NHS Trust Imperial College NHS Trust Cytology Workload Cervical Cytology 57,500 (decreases
More informationHistologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial
632 Histologic diagnosis of pancreatic masses using 25-gauge endoscopic ultrasound needles with and without a core trap: a multicenter randomized trial Authors Ken Kamata 1, Masayuki Kitano 1, Satoru Yasukawa
More informationP. Thomas Cherian, Prasoon Mohan, Abdel Douiri, Philippe Taniere, Rahul K. Hejmadi & Brinder S. Mahon
DOI:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00180.x HPB ORIGINAL ARTICLE Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic and peripancreatic lesions: is onsite cytopathology
More informationMacroscopic onsite evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy as an alternative to rapid onsite evaluation
Macroscopic onsite evaluation using endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy as an alternative to rapid onsite evaluation Authors En-Ling Leung Ki 1, 2, Anne-Isabelle Lemaistre 3,FabienFumex 1, Rodica
More informationSafety and utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of focal splenic lesions: a retrospective analysis
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Annals of Gastroenterology (2017) 30, 1-5 Safety and utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of focal splenic lesions: a retrospective analysis Surinder S. Rana
More informationThe Cytology of Pancreatic Foamy Gland Adenocarcinoma
Anatomic Pathology / CYTOLOGY OF PANCREATIC FOAMY GLAND ADENOCARCINOMA The Cytology of Pancreatic Foamy Gland Adenocarcinoma Edward B. Stelow, MD, 1 Stefan E. Pambuccian, MD, 2 Ricardo H. Bardales, MD,
More informationHow good is EUS in the diagnosis of submucosal mass lesion
How good is EUS in the diagnosis of submucosal mass lesion Dr. Yuk Tong LEE MBChB, MD(CUHK), FRCP (Edin), FRCP(Lond), FHKCP, FHKAM Specialist in Gastroenterology and Hepatology Submucosal tumour, SMT Subepithelial
More informationEndoscopic ultrasonography in suspected pancreatic malignancy and indecisive CT
O r i g i n a l a r t i c l e Endoscopic ultrasonography in suspected pancreatic malignancy and indecisive CT O.L.M. Meijer 1, R.K. Weersma 1, E.J. van der Jagt 2, H.M. van Dullemen 1 * Departments of
More informationThe Risk Factors for Acute Pancreatitis after Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Korean J Gastroenterol Vol. 72 No. 3, 135-140 https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2018.72.3.135 pissn 1598-9992 eissn 2233-6869 ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Risk Factors for Acute Pancreatitis after Endoscopic Ultrasound
More informationDOI: /reed /2017 Link: PubMed (Epub ahead of print)
Title: Endoscopic ultrasound cytologic brushing vs endoscopic ultrasound: fine needle aspiration for cytological diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions. A multicenter, randomized open-label trial Authors:
More informationDiagnostic Value of EBUS-TBNA in Various Lung Diseases (Lymphoma, Tuberculosis, Sarcoidosis)
Diagnostic Value of EBUS-TBNA in Various Lung Diseases (Lymphoma, Tuberculosis, Sarcoidosis) Sevda Sener Cömert, MD, FCCP. SBU, Kartal Dr.Lütfi Kırdar Training and Research Hospital Department of Pulmonary
More informationneedles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, con Revised_manuscript_for_resubmit-clean_version( Instructions for use
Title High and low negative pressure suction techniques in needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, con Kudo, Taiki; Kawakami, Hiroshi; Hayashi, Tsuyoshi; Y Author(s) Akio; Kawakubo, Kazumichi;
More informationPreoperative Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer
Review Preoperative Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis in Esophageal Cancer Yoko Murata, Masaho Ohta, Kazuhiko Hayashi, Hiroko Ide, and Ken Takasaki Lymph node metastasis (LMN) in esophageal cancer occurs
More informationThe development of endoscopic ultrasound scanning
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Tru-Cut Biopsy Peter Vilmann, MD, DSc,* and Rajesh Puri, MD Endoscopic ultrasound-guided (EUS) biopsy, including both fine needle aspiration (FNA)
More informationSoft tissue biopsy needles
Soft tissue biopsy needles Automated Achieve programmable biopsy systems 2 Semi-automated CareFusion offers a wide range of soft tissue biopsy needles that you can rely on for precise samples every time.
More informationImaging Guided Biopsy. Edited & Presented by ; Hussien A.B ALI DINAR. Msc Lecturer,Reporting Sonographer
Imaging Guided Biopsy Edited & Presented by ; Hussien A.B ALI DINAR. Msc Lecturer,Reporting Sonographer Objective By the End of this lessons you should : Define what biopsy Justify Aim to perform biopsy
More informationUltrasound-guided FNA Biopsy. American Thyroid Association 2017
Ultrasound-guided FNA Biopsy American Thyroid Association 2017 Robert A. Levine, MD, FACE, ECNU Thyroid Center of New Hampshire Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth University Disclosures: No relevant
More informationDiagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic lesions
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 2018; 22: 1397-1401 Diagnostic performance of endoscopic in pancreatic lesions Q.-M. WU 1, Y.-N. GUO 1, Y.-Q. XU 1 Digestive Department of Beijing
More informationAbhishek Biswas 1, John P. Wynne 2, Divya Patel 1, Michelle Weber 3, Shaleen Thakur 4, P. S. Sriram 1
Letter to the Editor Comparison of the yield of 19-G excelon core needle to a 21-G EUS needle during endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes for the
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine- Needle Aspiration for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Staging* A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
CHEST Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine- Needle Aspiration for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Staging* A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Carlos G. Micames, MD; Douglas C. McCrory, MD; Darren A. Pavey, MD;
More informationTitle: The endoscopic ultrasound-assisted Rendez-Vous technique for treatment of recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreas divisum and ansa pancreatica
Title: The endoscopic ultrasound-assisted Rendez-Vous technique for treatment of recurrent pancreatitis due to pancreas divisum and ansa pancreatica Authors: Sergio López-Durán, Celia Zaera, Juan Ángel
More informationperformed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.
Hello, I am Maura Polansky at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. I am a Physician Assistant in the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and the Program Director for Physician
More informationORIGINAL PAPERS. A prospective, controlled assessment of the technical characteristics of a novel forward-viewing echoendoscope
ORIGINAL PAPERS A prospective, controlled assessment of the technical characteristics of a novel forwardviewing echoendoscope Ángel CañeteRuiz 1, José Ramón ForunyOlcina 1, Fernando GonzálezPanizo 2, Alejandra
More informationEUS Elastography: Advances in Diagnostic EUS of the Pancreas
Review Article http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.s1.s12 pissn 1229-6929 eissn 2005-8330 Korean J Radiol 2012;13(S1):S12-S16 EUS Elastography: Advances in Diagnostic EUS of the Pancreas Tae Hee Lee,
More information40th European Congress of Cytology Liverpool, UK, 2-5 th October 2016
40th European Congress of Cytology Liverpool, UK, 2-5 th October 2016 EUS FNA of abdominal organs: An approach to reporting and triage for ancillary testing Date and time: Sunday 2 nd October 2016 15.00-16.30
More informationShan-yu Qin 1, You Zhou 2 *, Ping Li 3, Hai-xing Jiang 1 * Abstract. Introduction
Diagnostic Efficacy of Cell Block Immunohistochemistry, Smear Cytology, and Liquid-Based Cytology in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Single-Institution Experience
More informationSoft tissue biopsy needles
Soft tissue biopsy needles Automated Achieve programmable biopsy systems 4 Semi-automated CareFusion offers a wide range of soft tissue biopsy needles that you can rely on for precise samples every time.
More informationComparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions Young Keun Sur, MD, Young Chul Kim, MD, Jai Keun
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasonography Assessment for Ampullary and Bile Duct Malignancy
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Vol. 3, pp. 35-40 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by license only (C) 1996 OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) Amsterdam B.V.
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables
Review Article Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables Bhairvi S. Jani, Fadi Rzouq, Shreyas Saligram, Diego
More informationIntroduction of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS)
Introduction of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) Dr. Yuk Tong LEE MBChB, MD(CUHK), FRCP (Edin), FRCP(Lond), FHKCP, FHKAM Specialist in Gastroenterology and Hepatology Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) ª
More informationA Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Enlarged Pancreas on Computed Tomography
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2006;4:98 103 A Single-Center Experience of Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Enlarged Pancreas on Computed Tomography SAMMY HO,* ROBERT J. BONASERA, BONNIE J. POLLACK,
More informationEvaluation of AGA and Fukuoka Guidelines for EUS and surgical resection of incidental pancreatic cysts
Evaluation of AGA and Fukuoka Guidelines for EUS and surgical resection of incidental pancreatic cysts Authors Alexander Lee 1, Vivek Kadiyala 2,LindaS.Lee 3 Institutions 1 Texas Digestive Disease Consultants,
More informationThe Various Methods to Biopsy the Lung PROF SHITRIT DAVID HEAD, PULMONARY DEPARTMENT MEIR MEDICAL CENTER, ISRAEL
The Various Methods to Biopsy the Lung PROF SHITRIT DAVID HEAD, PULMONARY DEPARTMENT MEIR MEDICAL CENTER, ISRAEL Conflict of Interest This presentation is supported by AstraZeneca Two main steps before
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Staging Patients With Carcinoma of the Lung
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Staging Patients With Carcinoma of the Lung Michael B. Wallace, MD, MPH, Gerard A. Silvestri, MD, MS, Anand V. Sahai, MD, MS (Epid), Robert H. Hawes,
More informationLung Cytology: Lessons Learned from Errors in Practice
Lung Cytology: Lessons Learned from Errors in Practice Stephen S. Raab, M.D. Department of Laboratory Medicine Eastern Health and Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John s, NL and University of Washington,
More informationEndoscopic ultrasound of pancreatic lesions
Review Article on Pancreatic Surgery Endoscopic ultrasound of pancreatic lesions Charing C. N. Chong 1, Raymond S. Y. Tang 2, John C. T. Wong 2, Anthony W. H. Chan 3, Anthony Y. B. Teoh 1 1 Department
More informationCASE 01 LA Path Slide Seminar 13 March, 08. Deepti Dhall, MD Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
CASE 01 LA Path Slide Seminar 13 March, 08 Deepti Dhall, MD Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Clinical History 60 year old male presented with obstructive jaundice
More informationUltrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: New events
Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules: New events Sandrine Rorive, M.D., PhD. Erasme Hospital - Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) INTRODUCTION The assessment of thyroid nodules
More informationRapid On-Site Evaluation for Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of the Pancreas Decreases the Incidence of Repeat Biopsy Procedures
Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Endoscopic Ultrasound- Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy of the Pancreas Decreases the Incidence of Repeat Biopsy Procedures Brian T. Collins, MD 1 ; Faris M. Murad, MD 2 ; Jeff F.
More informationFNA thyroid. Thyroid FNA accuracy. Thyroid FNA And Cytopathology. Variability in FNA sampling via palpation
Thyroid FNA And Cytopathology University of California, San Francisco FNA thyroid Wide range of accuracy- causes Overview of tools and sampling Preparation techniques Impact of US guidance Impact of training
More informationAppendix e1, e2 and Supplementary material Table s1 s14 Online content viewable at: https://doi.org/ /s
Technical aspects of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline March 2017 Authors Marcin Polkowski 1, 2,
More informationUpdate on Thyroid FNA The Bethesda System. Shikha Bose M.D. Associate Professor Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Update on Thyroid FNA The Bethesda System Shikha Bose M.D. Associate Professor Cedars Sinai Medical Center Thyroid Nodules Frequent occurrence Palpable: 4-7% of adults Ultrasound: 10-31% Majority benign
More informationOriginal Article INTRODUCTION
Original Article A retrospective study evaluating endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections using a novel lumen apposing metal stent on an electrocautery enhanced delivery system
More informationEUS guided liver biopsy
EUS guided liver biopsy Abdul El Chafic, MD Ochsner Medical Center Department of Gastroenterology Section of Advanced endoscopy Disclosure/ Disclaimer I have a financial interest/arrangement of affiliation
More informationMediastinal Staging. Samer Kanaan, M.D.
Mediastinal Staging Samer Kanaan, M.D. Overview Importance of accurate nodal staging Accuracy of radiographic staging Mediastinoscopy EUS EBUS Staging TNM Definitions T Stage Size of the Primary Tumor
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasonography Clinical Impact. Giancarlo Caletti. Gastroenterologia Università di Bologna. Caletti
Clinical Impact Giancarlo Gastroenterologia Università di Bologna AUSL di Imola,, Castel S. Pietro Terme (BO) 1982 Indications Diagnosis of Submucosal Tumors (SMT) Staging of Neoplasms Evaluation of Pancreato-Biliary
More informationCase Scenario 1. The patient has now completed his neoadjuvant chemoradiation and has been cleared for surgery.
Case Scenario 1 July 10, 2010 A 67-year-old male with squamous cell carcinoma of the mid thoracic esophagus presents for surgical resection. The patient has completed preoperative chemoradiation. This
More informationNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE
NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedure overview of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for mediastinal
More informationRadiology Pathology Conference
Radiology Pathology Conference Sharlin Johnykutty,, MD, Cytopathology Fellow Sara Majewski, MD, Radiology Resident Friday, August 28, 2009 Presentation material is for education purposes only. All rights
More information22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses
Submit a Manuscript: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/ Help Desk: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/helpdesk.aspx DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i39.8820 World J Gastroenterol 2016 October 21; 22(39): 8820-8830 ISSN 1007-9327
More informationEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection ESD
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ESD Peter Draganov MD Professor of Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition University of Florida Gastrointestinal Cancer Lesion that Can be Treated
More informationULTRASOUND GUIDED FNA: WHEN, HOW, AND WHY
ULTRASOUND GUIDED FNA: WHEN, HOW, AND WHY Marika Russell, MD, FACS Assistant Professor, UCSF OHNS Disclosures: none Overview Background Indications Technique Outcomes Survey Office-based ultrasound? USG-FNA?
More informationEndoscopic ultrasound: what is it and when should it be used?
CLINICAL PRACTICE Clinical Medicine 2009, Vol 9, No 6: 539 43 Endoscopic ultrasound: what is it and when should it be used? Yogananda Reddy and Robert P Willert ABSTRACT Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is
More informationNEWSLETTER ENDOSONOGRAPHY NEWS LETTER WHY BLOCK THE CELL BLOCK? Immediate Gratification. June Dear Readers:
NEWSLETTER June 2012 ENDOSONOGRAPHY NEWS LETTER June 2012 Dear Readers: We invited Dr. Shantel Magee and her colleagues at the Cytopathology Division in the University of Alabama at Birmingham to provide
More informationTransaortic EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of lung tumors and lymph nodes
CASE STUDIES Transaortic EUS-guided FNA in the diagnosis of lung tumors and lymph nodes Martin B. von Bartheld, BSc, Klaus F. Rabe, MD, PhD, Jouke T. Annema, MD, PhD Leiden, The Netherlands Background:
More informationPaolo Giorgio Arcidiacono MD FASGE
LOCAL ABLATIVE TREATMENT OF PANCREATIC SOLID LESIONS. WHERE ARE WE NOW? Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono MD FASGE Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research
More informationClinical Study Bedside Endoscopic Ultrasound in Critically Ill patients
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Volume 2011, Article ID 529791, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2011/529791 Clinical Study Bedside Endoscopic Ultrasound in Critically Ill patients Mehdi Mohamadnejad, 1, 2 Julia
More information3rd Annual Orlando Live EUS 2015
3rd Annual Orlando Live EUS 2015 September 2-4, 2015 Florida Hospital Nicholson Center Celebration, Florida PRESENTED BY: SPONSORED BY: 3rd Annual Orlando Live EUS 2015 Overview The 3rd Annual Orlando
More informationJinlin Wang 1, Xiaoli Wu 1, Ping Yin 2, Qiaozhen Guo 1, Wei Hou 1, Yawen Li 1, Yun Wang 1 and Bin Cheng 1*
Wang et al. Trials (2016) 17:198 DOI 10.1186/s13063-016-1316-2 STUDY PROTOCOL Open Access Comparing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)- guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine needle biopsy (FNB) in the
More informationWhat Is an Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)?
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND (EUS) What Is an Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)? An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a specialized procedure that blends: Endoscopy use of a scope to look at the inside lining of the gastrointestinal
More informationEUS in the Management of
EUS in the Management of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers Frank Gress, MD Professor of Medicine and Chief Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology State University of New York Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn,
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography for Lung Cancer Staging
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2006;4:846 851 Endoscopic Ultrasound and Positron Emission Tomography for Lung Cancer Staging MANDEEP S. SAWHNEY,*, ROBERT A. KRATZKE, FRANK A. LEDERLE, AMY M.
More informationThe role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms
The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms CYSTIC LESIONS AND FLUID COLLECTIONS OF THE PANCREAS Their pathology ranges from pseudocysts and pancreatic necrosis
More information福島県立医科大学学術成果リポジトリ. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-g. Hiroyuki; Obara, Katsutoshi; Ohira, Citation Fukushima Journal of Medical Scienc
福島県立医科大学学術成果リポジトリ Title Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-g aspiration for schwannoma: six case Takasumi, Mika; Hikichi, Takuto; Ta Author(s) Rei; Watanabe, Ko; Nakamura, Jun; S Kikuchi, Hitomi; Konno,
More informationThe Use of Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumor Lesions of the Pancreas
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2005;3:S53 S57 The Use of Pancreatoscopy in the Diagnosis of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumor Lesions of the Pancreas KENJIRO YASUDA, MUNEHIRO SAKATA, MOOSE
More informationA Standard Endobronchial Ultrasound Image Classification System
CHEST Original Research INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLOGY The Utility of Sonographic Features During Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Lymph Node Staging in Patients With Lung
More informationRepeat Thyroid Nodule Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients With Initial Benign Cytologic Results
Anatomic Pathology / REPEAT THYROID FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION Repeat Thyroid Nodule Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients With Initial Benign Cytologic Results Melina B. Flanagan, MD, MSPH, 1 N. Paul Ohori,
More informationEndoscopic Ultrasound in Patients Over 80 Years Old
DOI 10.1007/s10620-011-1718-7 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Endoscopic Ultrasound in Patients Over 80 Years Old Tan Attila Douglas O. Faigel Received: 11 January 2011 / Accepted: 8 April 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business
More informationEUS FNA NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS. A. Ginès Endocopy Unit Hospital Cínic. Barcelona (Spain)
EUS FNA NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS A. Ginès Endocopy Unit Hospital Cínic. Barcelona (Spain) GI NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS GENERAL CONCEPTS Rare neoplasms arising from the neuroendocrine cells of the GI tract Include:
More information