The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires
|
|
- Suzan Williams
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires Michael Tselepis, BDSc (Mel b.), MDSc (Mel b.), Peter Brockhurst, BTch (Mel b.), MSc (Melb.), PhD,b and Victor C. West, MDSc (Melb.), BSc (Melb.)C Brisbane, Queensland, and Melbourne, Australia Limited published research on friction deals mainly with conventional stainless steel brackets and arch wires. However, the clinician can choose from a range of modern materials in determining arch wire and bracket combinations. This study quantifies the dynamic frictional force of sliding between different modern orthodontic brackets and arch wires. From the multitude of factors involved in the frictional process, the following were selected for investigation: arch wire material, bracket material, bracket-to-arch wire angulation, and lubrication (artificial saliva). The frictional force involved in sliding a ligated arch wire through a bracket slot was measured with a universal materials testing machine. A four-way analysis of variance was used to assess the results. Of the four factors investigated, all were found to have a significant influence on friction. Polycarbonate brackets showed the highest friction and stainless steel brackets the lowest. Friction increased with bracket-to-arch wire angulation. Lubrication significantly reduced friction. A range of.9 to 6.8 N frictional force was recorded. The actual force values recorded were most useful for comparing the relative influence of the factors tested on friction, rather than as a quantitative assessment of friction in vivo. The forces observed suggest that friction may be a significant influence on the amount of applied force required to move a tooth in the mouth. Hence, arch wire and bracket selection may be an important consideration when posterior anchorage is critical. (AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1994;16:131-8.) Friction is the resistance to motion encountered when one solid body slides or tends to slide over another. It may be described as a force acting parallel to the direction of motion. 1 Friction is a factor in all forms of sliding mechanics, such as canine retraction into an extraction site, and in leveling and alignment where the wire must slide through the brackets and tubes present. Friction may exist in two forms: (1) Static friction, which is the resistance that prevents actual motion, and (2) dynamic (kinetic) friction, which exists during motion.2,3 Several techniques have been used to measure frictional resistance between arch wires and brackets, such as a dynamometer," a weighted basket' or bucket," a force gauge,":" and a universal testing machine."!" A review of the orthodontic literature revealed that friction between arch wires and brackets is multifactorial. In summarizing the results of the various authors, 'Orthodontist-In-Charge, Children's Dental Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 'Senior Lecturer, Dental Faculty, University of Queensland. Australia. 'Head in the Department of Orthodontics University of Melbourne, Australia. Copyright 1994 by the American Association of Orthodontists /94/$3. + 8/1/43552 there was agreement that frictional resistance will increase (1 to 3) or vary (4,5) with the following: (1) wire size,* (2) angulation of wire to bracket,4.5,7,8 (3) ligature force,"!' (4) a change in wire shape,5.11,13.14,17 and, (5) a change in wire material ,15-19 However, there are conflicting views on the influence of (1) bracket width,4, (2) lubrication.y'":":" (3) surface roughness,5,6, ,2,21 and, (4) ligature design (stainless steel or elastic rings) ,22 The specific objectives of this report were to investigate the influence on frictional resistance by (1) different arch wire and bracket materials, (2) bracketto-arch wire angulation, and (3) lubrication, in the form of artificial saliva. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two combinations were measured under both wet and dry conditions, as detailed in Table I. Each bracket was cemented to a 12.5 mm diameter stainless steel rod. Contaminants were removedby using an ultrasonic cleanerand 99.7% to 1% v/v ethanol. A period of 6 days elapsed before any readings were taken to allow the elastic ligature rings (Unitek AI) previously placed on the brackets to reach a stable level of force. This 'References 5, 7, 8,1,11,13,14,
2 132 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West American Journal oforthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics AURust 1994 Table I. Experimental sample Brackets I. Style: Lower anterior edgewise 2. Slot Width:.18 inch (.46 mm) 3. Materials: Stainless steel (SS)' Polycarbonate (PC)b Porcelain (PO)' Sapphire (SA)' 4. Total sample size: 32 brackets (eight per type) equally subdivided into wet and dry test condition groups Wires I. Materials: Stainless steel (Hi-T) (SS)' Cobalt chromium (Blue Elgiloy) (CCl' Nickel titanium (Nitinol) (NT)' Beta titanium (TMA) (BT)' 2. Dimensions:.16 x.22 inches (.41 x.56 mm) 3. Length: 7 inches (175 mm) 4. Total sample size: 32 archwires (eight per type) equally subdivided into wet and dry test condition groups "Unitek Corp., Monrovia, Calif. "American Orthodontics, Sheboygan, Wis. 'Tomy International, Tokyo, Japan. 'A-Company, Inc., San Diego, Calif. 'Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Denver, Colo. 'Ormco Corp., Glendora, Calif. Fig. 1. Test apparatus. Bracket and ligated arch wire in collet device located on universal testing machine platform. was confinned in a pilot study using a control set-up consisting of a stainless steel bracket and stainless steel arch wire. The frictional force during 4 mm of arch wire travel was recorded for seven different ligature rings. The procedure was repeated using ligature rings that were prestretched over a bracket for 6 days. A collet apparatus was employed to rigidly hold the rods and, hence, fix the bracket-to-arch wire angulation to any chosen value as measured by a circular protractor attached to the collet. Each arch wire was pulled through a bracket slot by a pin vice suspended from a 5 N load cell through links of a metal chain. The varying amount of applied force (in newtons) required to move the arch wire a distance of 4 mm at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min was recorded graphically by a universal testing machine (Shimadzu HAG-IOTA Autograph, Kyoto, Japan) (Fig. I) and mean force values were calculated. Ten trials for each bracket-to-arch wire angulation, over a total distance of 4 mm each, were performed. The arch wires and brackets were grouped and tested so that not one of the eight brackets in any group had more than one arch wire drawn through it. Similarly, no individual arch wire was drawn through more than one bracket. This was to eliminate the influence of wear, as each bracket and arch wire were tested only once. By using the same protocol, a separate series of readings were taken for the arch wire and bracket set-up while lubricated by applying drops of artificial saliva (Salube, Orapharm Pty Ltd., Melbourne, Australia). RESULTS Sixteen different types of devices (as a result of combining four types of brackets with four types of arch wires) were statistically analyzed. The frictional force was represented in newtons required to slide an arch wire along a bracket for a given distance. The term friction, when used in a quantitative sense, refers to the average dynamic frictional force associated with a specific movement. At each arch wire/bracket/condition/degree combination, 1 measurements were taken, resulting in 64 measurements in total. The results are presented in Table II. Analysis of variance The statistical analysis used was a four-way analysis of variance. All variance ratios were greater than the critical values at a 95% confidence level. This meant that combinations of all four factors tested (arch wires,
3 AmericanJournal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 16, No.2 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West 133 Table II. Mean frictional force (newtons) and standard deviation (SD) for bracket!wire combinations (Based on 1 observations per entry) BracketIwire angulation Dry condition Wet condition 1 if 1 Bracket Wire Mean I (SD) Mean I (SD) Mean I (SD) Mean I (SD) SS SS 2.25 (.22) 2.69 (.13).89 (.4) 1.72 (.2) CC 1.84 (.11) 3.6 (.6) 1.28 (.5) 1.74 (.2) NT 1.84 (.11) 2.3 (.2) 1.28 (.3) 1.74 (.3) BT 1.99 (.15) 2.85 (.5) 1.89 (.8) 2.56 (.6) All 1.99 (.23) 2.72 (.29) 1.34 (.36) 1.94 (.36) PO SS 3.9 (.7) 3.89 (.7) 2.25 (.3) 3.26 (.6) CC 2.23 (.3) 2.86 (.4) 2.1 (.5) 3.18 (.5) NT 2.9 (.5) 2.59 (.4) 2.44 (.5) 2.72 (.3) BT 2.76 (.4) 3.51 (.5) 2.19 (.4) 2.71 (.5) All 2.56 (.4) 3.21 (.52) 2.22 (.16) 2.97 (.26) SA S5 3.7 (.11) 4.59 (.5) 3.5 (.14) 2.49 (.6) CC 2.36 (.8) 3.34 (.9) 3.15 (.7) 3.79 (.6) NT 2.95 (.6) 3.37 (.7) 3.21 (.14) 3.16 (.5) BT 2.85 (.6) 3.34 (.1) 2.62 (.9) 4.18 (.18) All 2.81 (.28) 3.66 (.55) 3.12 (.35) 3.4 (.66) PC SS 3.25 (.18) 6.72 (.29) 2.87 (.6) 4.75 (.5) CC 2.71 (.11) 4.64 (.2) 2.7 (.5) 3.23 (.5) NT 2.69 (.6) 3.25 (.6) 2.5 (.5) 2.72 (.11) BT 3.27 (.9) 4.57 (.12) 2.6 (.6) 3.2 (.6) All 2.98 (.3) 4.79 (1.26) 2.26 (.36) 3.43 (.8) All SS 2.91 (.42) 4.47 (1.49) 2.38 (.98) 3.6 (1.13) CC 2.3 (.33) 3.47 (.71) 2.13 (.68) 2.97 (.78) NT 2.39 (.45) 2.88 (.46) 2.24 (.71) 2.58 (.53) BT 2.73 (.45) 3.56 (.64) 2.19 (.28) 3.11 (.65) All 2.58 (.48) 3.59 (1.7) 2.24 (.71) 2.93 (.82) brackets, angulation, and lubrication) were significantly affecting friction. The analysis of variance also tested for interactions between the factors. To better appreciate the meaning of these interactions, the means of the bracket/ arch wire combinations for each of the conditions and angulations were plotted in Figs. 2 and 3. As seen from the plots, different arch wires produce different amounts of friction with different brackets. If there were no interactions, then the relative frictional value of the arch wires would not change as the bracket type changes. Relative ranklngs of the bracket/arch wire combinations From Table II the following trends were evident: (1) For the dry condition, the polycarbonate bracket! stainless steel arch wire combination produced the most friction at both angulations; (2) for the wet condition, the stainless steel bracket!stainless steel arch wire combination produced the least friction at both angulations; (3) highest overall friction was for poly-. carbonate bracket! stainless steel arch wire (under dry conditions at 1 ); and (4) the lowest overall friction was for stainless steel bracket!stainless steel arch wire (under wet conditions at ). These differences were highly significant. The range of mean frictional resistance was.89 to 6.72 N. Effect of angulation on friction Ten degrees bracket!arch wire angulation gave highly significant greater values for friction than for nearly all bracket!arch wire combinations under both wet and dry conditions. Effect of lubrication on friction Zero degrees bracket/arch wire angulation. Lubrication in the form of artificial saliva gave highly significant lower frictional values than the dry condition for nearly all bracket!arch wire combinations. The greatest frictional reduction was 6.5% for the stainless
4 134 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics August (jj c 5.5.DRY ADRY 1 Ql 5. Ql o u. tii C Q o 3. 'E '" 2.5 c > Wire CC NT BT SS CC NT BT SS CC NT BT SS CC NT BT SS Bracket Stainless Steel Porcelain Sapphire Polycarbonate Bracket / Wire Combinations Fig. 2. Average friction between arch wire/bracket combinations for dry condition at and 1. steel bracket/stainless steel arch wire combination. The smallest reduction was 8.1% for the sapphire bracket/beta-titanium arch wire combination. Ten degrees bracket/arch wire angulation. Lubrication gave highly significant lower values than the dry condition for nearly all bracket/ arch wire combinations. The greatest reduction in friction occurred for sapphire bracket/stainless steel arch wire producing a 46% reduction in friction. The least reduction was for sapphire bracket/nickel titanium arch wire producing a 6% reduction only. However, for some combinations lubrication increased the frictional resistance. The greatest frictional increase was by 2% for the sapphire bracket/beta titanium arch wire. Comparison ofindividual brackets. When there was an increase in friction, it involved only sapphire and porcelain brackets. The stainless steel brackets all showed a decrease in friction with lubrication, regardless of arch wire or angulation. The polycarbonte brackets either showed a decrease or no change. Ligature testing-pilot study The effect on frictional force when using different elastic ligature rings was shown to be statistically insignificant by the low coefficients of variation obtained (4.8% to 8.6%) for new rings (Table III). Ligature rings prestretched for 6 days exhibited highly significant lower frictional values by comparison to new rings, and lower coefficients of variation (Table IV). DISCUSSION Comparison of results A characteristic of the current orthodontic literature on friction is the significant number of variables involved in the experimental techniques used. These may include: (1) arch wires and brackets from different manufacturers, with inherent differences in surface finish, hardness, and stiffness, (2) sliding velocity, (3) ligation mode, (4) the use of flats instead of brackets," and (5) whether a bracket is in a rigid mount or one that allows movement in one or more planes. 14 Hence, differences
5 American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 16, No.2 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West (/l c WET Q) c: WET 1 5 Q) o 11. (ij C.Q t5. E ell c > :A <:: 1. 5 Wire CC NT 8T SS CC NT 8T SS Bracket Stainless Steel Porcelain CC NT 8T SS Sappture CC NT 8T SS polycarbonate Bracket / Wire Combinations Fig. 3. Average friction between arch wire/bracket combinations for wet condition at and 1. in experimental results for any given arch wire and bracket couple should not be surprising. Stainless steel bracket There was no significant difference in friction betweenthe stainless steel bracket and different arch wire combinations under dry conditions at. This supports Peterson et al., 8 but differs with other investigators 5,6.12,14-1?,19 who found nickel-titanium arch wire to show very high frictional resistance with such a bracket. The explanation may be in fact that nickel titanium arch wires from different manufacturers show differences in recorded friction, as well as surface roughness, asshown by Prososki et al." They found no significant correlation between surface roughness and friction for the various nickel titanium wires tested. At 1 bracket! arch wire angulation the arch wires could be ranked in increasing order of friction as: nickel-titanium followed by stainless steel or beta-titanium, followed by cobalt-chromium. These results supported those of Frank and Nikolai" and Peterson et al. 8 Hence, frictional values may vary for a given bracket-arch wire combination as a tooth moves along an arch wire in a tipping and uprighting fashion. Clinically, tooth movement occurs not in a continuous manner, but rather as a cycle of short steps. To simulate this, some investigators have mounted the bracket so as to allow free movement (Kapila et al.,14 Bednar et ai,23). However, the validity of this to the actual clinical situation is yet to be proven. lubrication The function of a lubricant is to reduce the strength and number of bridges formed between the asperities ofsliding surfaces.24 It is generally perceived that saliva acts as a lubricant. Frictional resistance was found to decrease under wet conditions (artificial saliva). This supported the findings of Baker et al. 9 It was at variance with Andreasen and Quevedo? who found no significant difference, while others.t-":" have found an increase in friction with artificial saliva. Pratten et al., 6 suggested that at high loads (undefined), saliva may be forced out from
6 136 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics August 1994 Table III. Effect of new ligatures on bracket/arch wire friction (newtons) (5 ligatures per sample) 95% Ligature confidence Coefficient sample Meanforce interval variation I 3.38 (.13) (3.12, 3.64) 4.8% (.37) (3.51,5.2) 8.6% (.18) (4.7, 5.46) 3.6% (.31) (3.38, 4.66) 7.7% (.23) (3.31,4.9) 6.2% (.26) (3.2, 4.6) 7.2% (.21) (3.4, 3.74) 6.2% Table IV. Effect of relaxed ligatures on bracket/arch wire friction (newtons) (5 ligatures per sample) 95% Ligature confidence Coefficient sample Meanforce interval variation I 2.2 (.13) (1.8, 2.25) 6.4% (.12) (1.66, 2.9) 8.5% (.12) (1.56, 2.66) 18.6% (.17) (2.14,2.61) 7.2% (.11) (1.1,2.13) 15.4% (.8) (1.53, 2.45) 4.% 7.72 (.2) (.49,.96) 15.3% the contacts between the bracket and the arch wire, resulting in an increase in friction. Hence, saliva may act as a lubricant only at low loads as determined by ligature force. However, according to the engineering literature, it is impossible to force out completely even an oil film from between two plane surfaces, no matter how heavy the load." The different findings may be related to the formulations of different artificial saliva solutions, as well as the technique of applying the saliva to the bracket/arch wire assembly, which is often not specified in the publications. That is, it may be expected that using a bath of saliva would provide continuous lubrication as opposed to simply applying the saliva as drops. Kusy et al. 26 was the first to employ a peristaltic pump to inject fresh human saliva onto a bracket-arch wire assembly. As was the case for studies that used artificial saliva, Kusy et al. 26 reported mixed results, in that human saliva could both reduce and increase friction depending on the particular bracket-arch wire combination. Bracket/arch wire angulation As bracket/arch wire angulation increased, so did frictional resistance. Similar results were found by Frank and Nikolai,", Andreasen and Quevedo," and Peterson et al. 8 An angulation of 1 allows comparison to previous published reports. Clinically, however, bracket-arch wire angulation is determined by such variables as wire cross-section, wire material, and magnitude of applied force to the tooth. Stainless steel arch wire At, under dry conditions, and with stainless steel arch wire, brackets were ranked in order of increasing friction as stainless steel, followed by polycarbonate, sapphire, or porcelain. This supported the work of Riley et al., 11 Berger," Angolkar et ai., 17 and Popli et al. 19 These rankings may represent variation in surface roughness of the bracket slot surfaces, which has yet to be fully investigated. Porcelain bracket In general, porcelain brackets demonstrated greater friction than stainless steel brackets. According to Kusy" this is due not to their surface roughness but rather to their chemical structure. This may explain why both sapphire and ceramic brackets showed increased friction under lubrication. Popli et al. 19 found that with nickel-titanium (Nitinol) arch wire, porcelain brackets generate more friction than stainless steel brackets. This was not supported by the present study that found no difference
7 American Journal oforthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Volume 16, No.2 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West 137 between these brackets for nickel-titanium arch wire. Kusy and Whitley" state that bracket material does not significantly influence the coefficient of friction. What to measure, static, or kinetic friction? The dilemma was to decide which form of friction was relevant to the clinical orthodontic situation. There is a constant alternating between static and dynamic friction as a tooth intermittently slides and binds along the arch wire during orthodontic movement. It was decided to measure frictional resistance by programming the universal testing machine to calculate the average of all the peaks recorded over 4 mm of arch wiresliding, with the exception ofthe first peak. Hence, kinetic friction was measured rather than static friction, because of the variable nature of the frictional process. Similar approaches to the problem were made by other authors who all measured kinetic friction. Othershave measured static friction only, by measuring the weight of lead shot" or water in a container" required to initiate sliding, or by using a force gauge.":" Kusy and Whitley" determined both static and kinetic coefficients of friction. Clinical significance The clinical significance of friction is its role in lessening the force actually received by a tooth from an active component such as a spring, loop, or elastic. Hence, greater applied force is needed to move a tooth with a bracket-arch wire combination demonstrating high magnitudes of friction (e.g., polycarbonate bracket) compared with one with a low frictional value (e.g., stainless steel bracket). This has clinical implications in cases demonstrating critical posterior anchorage, such as those requiring reduction of a large overjet. In such malocclusions, one would be wise to use a bracket and arch wire combination that minimizes friction so as to conserve the available anchorage. A limitation of the study was the difficulty in extrapolating the values for friction determined in vitro to an in vivo situation. This was due to the difficulty of reproducing oral conditions such as muscular and occlusal forces, and tooth movement through bone, which may affect the binding of the arch wire to the bracket. Hence, the relative rankings of the arch wires and brackets were considered to be more meaningful than actual force values recorded for a given experimental set-up. CONCLUSIONS 1. Combinations of all four factors tested (arch wire, brackets, angulation, and lubrication) were statistically significant in the frictional process. Interactions between the factors were also significant. 2. In general, polycarbonate brackets showed the highest values for friction and stainless steel brackets showed the lowest values. 3. Specifically, the combination with the highest frictional resistance was a polycarbonate bracket with a stainless steel arch wire (wet conditions at 1 ). 4. The lowest frictional resistance was for a stainless steel bracket with a stainless steel arch wire (wet conditions at ). 5. Bracket-to-arch wire angulation was shown to have a significant effect under both wet and dry conditions. In general, frictional resistance increased with angulation, but exceptions did exist. 6. Lubrication significantly reduced the frictional resistance (up to 6.5%) for both and 1 bracket-to-arch wire angulation. Exceptions were found. 7. The difference between the least (.9 N) and the greatest frictional force (6.8 N) recorded was significant. 8. Elastic ligature rings, especially when prestretched or allowed to relax, were not a significant source of bias toward the frictional forces recorded. REFERENCES 1. Halling J. Principles of tribology. New York: Macmillan, Bowden FP, Tabor D. Friction. An introduction to tribology. Garden City, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday, Rabinowicz E. Friction and wear of materials. New York: J Wiley, Nicolls J. Frictional forces in fixed orthodontic appliance. Dent Practit 1968;18: Frank CA, Nikolai RJ. A comparitive study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and archwire. AMJ ORTHOD 198;78: Pratten DH, Popli K, Germane N, Gunsolley JC. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 199;98: Andreasen GF, Quevedo FR. Evaluation of friction forces in the.22*.28 edgewise bracket in-vitro. J Biomechanics 197;3: Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. A comparison of friction resistance for nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int 1982;5: Baker KL, Nieberg LG, Weimer LD, Hanna M. Frictional changes in force values caused by saliva substitution. AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1987;91: Garner LD, Allai WW, Moore BK. A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edge-
8 138 Tselepis, Brockhurst, and West American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics August 1994 wise arch wire. AM 1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1986;9: Riley 1L, Garrett SG, Moon PC. Frictional forces of ligated metal and edgewise brackets. 1 Dent Res 1979;58:A21, IADR Abstract, Stannard1G, Gau 1M, Hanna MA. Comparitive friction of orthodontic wires under dry and wet conditions. AM 1 ORTHOD 1986;89: Berger 1L, The influence of the SPEED bracket's self-ligating design on force levels in tooth movement: a comparitive in vitro study. AM 1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 199;97: Kapila S, Angolkar PV, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four different alloys. AM 1 ORTHOD DENToFAc ORTHOP 199;98: Kusy RP, Whitley 1Q. Coefficients of friction for archwires in stainless steel and polycrystalline alumina bracket slots. I. The dry state. AM 1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 199;98: Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schumacher H. Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire. AM 1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1989;96: Angolkar PV, Kapila S, Duncanson MG, Nanda RS. Evaluation of friction between ceramic brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys. AM1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 199;98: Echols PM. Elastic ligatures: binding forces and anchorage taxation. AM 1 ORTHOD 1975;67: Popli K, Pratten D, Germane N, Gunsolley 1. Frictional resistance of ceramic and stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Special Issue Mar Dent Res 1989;68: Kusy RP, Whitley 1D. Effects of sliding velocity on frictional coefficients of archwires. Special Issue Mar Dent Res 1989;68: Prososki RR, Bagby MD, Erickson K. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires. AM 1 OR THOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1991;1; Thurow RC. Edgewise orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis: CV Mosby, Bednar 1R, Gruendeman GW, Sandrik 1L. A comparitive study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. AM 1 ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1991;1: West AC. Friction and boundary lubrication. Lubrication Engineering 1953;9: Finch GI. The sliding surface. 34th Guthrie lecture. Proc Phys Soc 195;B63: Kusy RP, Whitley 1Q, Prewitt M1. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states. Angle Orthod 1991;61: Kusy RP. Commentary: ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod 1991;61: Reprint requests to: Michael Tselepis Brisbane Children's Dental Hospital 134 St. Pauls Tee, Spring Hill Queensland, Australia 4 BOUND VOLUMES AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS Bound volumes of the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTO FACIAL ORTHOPEDICS are available to subscribers (only) for the 1994 issues from the Publisher, at a cost of $64.5 ($8.2 Canada and $75.5 international) for Vol. 15 (January-June) and Vol. 16 (July-December). Shipping charges are included. Each bound volume contains a subject and author index and all advertising is removed. Copies are shipped within 6 days after publication of the last issue in the volume. The binding is durable buckram with the journal name, volume number, and year stamped in gold on the spine. Payment must accompany all orders. Contact Mosby-Year Book, Subscription Services, 1183 Westline Industrial Dr., St. Louis, MO , USA; telephone (314) or (8) Subscriptions must be in force to qualify. Bound volumes are not available in place of a regular Journal subscription.
Introduction. Formerly known as Susan David
European Journal of Orthodontics 20 (1998) 589 596 1998 European Orthodontic Society A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types
More informationABSTRACT INTRODUCTION /jp-journals
ORIGINAL RESEARCH 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2102 An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions
More informationAn in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance
European Journal of Orthodontics 29 (2007) 390 397 doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm007 The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions,
More informationThere has been increased use of self-ligating. Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Friction between various self-ligating brackets and archwire couples during sliding mechanics Sennay Stefanos, a Antonino G. Secchi, b Guy Coby, c Nipul Tanna, a and Francis K. Mante d
More informationEvaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional resistance
European Journal of Orthodontics 26 (2004) 327 332 European Journal of Orthodontics vol. 26 no. 3 European Orthodontic Society 2004; all rights reserved. Evaluation of methods of archwire ligation on frictional
More informationFrictional properties of aesthetic brackets
European Journal of Orthodontics 29 (2007) 359 365 doi:10.1093/ejo/cjm033 The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions,
More informationA comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets
European Journal of Orthodontics 26 (2004) 105 111 European Journal of Orthodontics vol. 26 no. 1 European Orthodontic Society 2004; all rights reserved. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional
More informationA study of the frictional characteristics of four commercially available self-ligating bracket systems
European Journal of Orthodontics 3 (28) 645 653 doi:1.193/ejo/cjn58 Advance Access publication 28 October 28 The Author 28. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society.
More informationA Comparison of Frictional Resistance between Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets with Conventional Bracket Systems
10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1102 H ORIGINAL Jyothikiran et RESEARCH al A Comparison of Frictional Resistance between Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets with Conventional Bracket Systems 1 H Jyothikiran,
More informationMeasurements of the torque moment in various archwire bracket ligation combinations
European Journal of Orthodontics 34 (2012) 374 380 doi:10.1093/ejo/cjr022 Advance Access Publication 13 May 2011 The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic
More informationArchwire seating forces produced by different ligation methods and their effect on frictional resistance
European Journal of Orthodontics 27 (2005) 302 308 doi:10.1093/ejo/cji008 The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontics Society. All rights reserved. For
More informationIn Vitro Frictional Forces Generated by Three Different Ligation Methods
Original Article In Vitro Frictional Forces Generated by Three Different Ligation Methods Paola Gandini a ; Linda Orsi b ; Chiara Bertoncini c ; Sarah Massironi d ; Lorenzo Franchi e ABSTRACT Objective:
More informationA New Low-Friction Ligation System
2005 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. www.jco-online.com A New Low-Friction Ligation System ARTURO FORTINI, MD, DDS MASSIMO LUPOLI, MD, DDS VITTORIO CACCIAFESTA, DDS, MS Many factors
More informationThird-Order Torque and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Type Effects on Sliding Friction
Original Article Third-Order Torque and Self-Ligating Orthodontic Bracket Type Effects on Sliding Friction Michael Chung a ; Robert J. Nikolai b ; Ki Beom Kim c ; Donald R. Oliver c ABSTRACT Objective:
More informationFrictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures
Galvão et al. Progress in Orthodontics 2013, 14:9 RESEARCH Open Access Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures Mariana Bulhoes
More informationA review of the orthodontic literature
A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems Prasanna Kumar Shivapuja, BDS, MDS (Ortho), DDS, MS (Ortho)," and Jeff Berger, BDS, Dip. Orth." Detroit, Mich. The increased
More informationFrictional Resistance in Various Ceramic Brackets using Archwires of different Alloys, Sizes and Cross sections: A Comparative Study
Research Article Frictional Resistance in Various Ceramic Brackets using Archwires of different Alloys, Sizes and Cross sections: Dr Yash Raj Bahadur. 1 Dr Deepak Kumar Agarwal, 2 Dr Ankur Gupta, 3 Dr
More informationThe Tip-Edge appliance and
Figure 1: Internal surfaces of the edgewise archwire slot are modified to create the Tip-Edge archwire slot. Tipping surfaces (T) limit crown tipping during retraction. Uprighting surfaces (U) control
More informationA New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction
A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction WILLIAM VOGT, DDS Fixed devices are increasingly being used for molar distalization in Class II treatment because they eliminate the need for special
More informationThe management of impacted
Using a rigid hook and spring auxiliary slid onto the archwire to direct eruption of impacted teeth BY S. JAY BOWMAN, DMD, MSD, AND ALDO CARANO, DR ODONT, MS, SPEC ORTHOD Figure 1: A 12-year-old female
More informationWith judicious treatment planning, the clinical
CLINICIAN S CORNER Selecting custom torque prescriptions for the straight-wire appliance Earl Johnson San Francisco, Calif Selecting custom torque prescriptions based on the treatment needs of each patient
More information.::...;;;,:..=.::..==;::..;=== RESEARCH ARTICLE -
(J Ind Orthocl Soc 2002; 35:107-112).::...;;;,:..=.::..==;::..;===------------ RESEARCH ARTICLE - Evaluation of frictional forces of different archwire materials against preadjusted edgewise stainless
More informationAL-AZHAR. Dental Journal. Print ISSN Online ISSN ADJ-for Girls, Vol. 5, No. 1, January (2018) PP. 9:14
AL-AZHAR Dental Journal F o r G i r l s The Official Publication of The Faculty of Dental Medicine For Girls, Al-Azhar University Cairo, Egypt. Print ISSN 2537-0308 Online ISSN 2537-0316 ADJ-for Girls,
More informationEffect of Brackets Types on the Amount of Movement and Rotation of Canine during Retraction: A Simulated In vitro Study
International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences Available online at www.ijmrhs.com ISSN No: 2319-5886 International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences, 2017, 6(9): 62-70 I J M R
More informationINDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required
DEFINITION Fixed Appliances are devices or equipments that are attached to the teeth, cannot be removed by the patient and are capable of causing tooth movement. INDICATIONS Fixed Appliances are indicated
More informationThe effect of environmental factors on elastomeric chain and nickel titanium coil springs
European Journal of Orthodontics 20 (1998) 169 176 1998 European Orthodontic Society The effect of environmental factors on elastomeric chain and nickel titanium coil springs Claire Nattrass*, Anthony
More informationCharacterizing constraining forces in the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment
Original Article Characterizing constraining forces in the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment Christopher G. Gibson a ; Feng-Chang Lin b ; Ceib Phillips c ; Alex Edelman d ; Ching-Chang Ko e ABSTRACT
More informationForsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases
Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases by Lisa Alvetro, DDS, MSD After receiving her DDS summa cum laude from Ohio State University, Dr. Alvetro
More informationUse of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports
Case Report Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports Helen Taylor, BDS, MScD, DOrth, MOrth, FDSRCS(Eng) a Abstract: Vertical control is
More informationComparison of Frictional Resistance in Conventional Brackets with Different Stainless Steel Wires
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Comparison of Frictional Resistance in Conventional 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2394 Brackets with Different SS Wires Comparison of Frictional Resistance in Conventional Brackets with Different
More informationCoated, uncoated stainless steel ligatures versus Self ligation- In the perspective of friction
ORIGINAL ARTICLE POJ 2013:5(2) 60-66 Coated, uncoated stainless steel ligatures versus Self ligation- In the perspective of friction Anilkumar Katta a, Venkataramana Vannala b, Kurunji Kumaran Navaneethakrishnan
More informationIn vitro comparative study on the friction of stainless steel wires with and without Orthospeed (JAL 90458) on an inclined plane
Journal section: Orthodontics Publication Types: Research doi:10.4317/jced.52715 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.52715 with and without Orthospeed (JAL 90458) on an inclined plane Juan J. Alió-Sanz 1, Miguel
More informationORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS
ORTHOdontics PGI/II SLIDING MECHANICS FOCUS ON TARGETED SPACE GAINING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING WITH RAPID PALATAL EXPANDIONS. ALSO INCLUDES RETENTION AND CLINICAL PEARLS FACULTY: Joseph Ghafari,
More informationEffects of a diamond-like carbon coating on the frictional properties of orthodontic wires
Original Article Effects of a diamond-like carbon coating on the frictional properties of orthodontic wires Takeshi Muguruma a ; Masahiro Iijima b ; William A. Brantley c ; Itaru Mizoguchi d ABSTRACT Objective:
More informationControlled Space Closure with a Statically Determinate Retraction System
Original Article Controlled Space Closure with a Statically Determinate Retraction System Kwangchul Choy, DDS, MS, PhD a ; Eung-Kwon Pae, DDS, MSc, PhD b ; Kyung-Ho Kim, DDS, MS, PhD c ; Young Chel Park,
More informationTHE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM
THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM McLaughlin, Bennett, Trevisi The MBT Versatile+ Appliance System THE DEVELOPMENT OF A TREATMENT MECHANICS AND APPLIANCE PHILOSOPHY The first fully programmed preadjusted
More informationThe Study of Frictional Force in Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research Vol. 6, No. 4, July 2017 The Study of Frictional Force in Self-Ligating Orthodontic Brackets Nattakarn Hirunyapanun, Nuntinee Nanthavanich
More informationFrom Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment
From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment by Lisa Alvetro, DDS After receiving her DDS summa cum laude from Ohio State University, Dr. Lisa Alvetro completed
More informationThe effect of Gable angle size and spring activation distance of 0.016x0.022 NiTi and TMA sectional T-loop towards force, moment y.
Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry 2009;21(2):78-87. The effect of angle size and spring activation distance of 0.016x0.022 NiTi and TM sectional T-loop towards force, moment y values Norman Wachyudi, Tono
More informationThe effect of surface treatment and clinical use on friction in NiTi orthodontic wires
Dental Materials (2005) 21, 938 945 www.intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/dema The effect of surface treatment and clinical use on friction in NiTi orthodontic wires Andrea Wichelhaus a, *, Marc Geserick
More informationFRICTION PRODUCED BY ESTHETIC BRACKETS WITH VARYING LIGATION CHRISTINE KNOX ABENOJA
FRICTION PRODUCED BY ESTHETIC BRACKETS WITH VARYING LIGATION by CHRISTINE KNOX ABENOJA ANDRE FERREIRA, COMMITTEE CHAIR LIONEL SADOWSKY JOHN BURGESS MARK LITAKER FIROZ RAHEMTULLA A THESIS Submitted to the
More informationComparative Biomechanics of Labial versus Lingual Fixed Appliances - A Review
Comparative Biomechanics of Labial versus Lingual Fixed Appliances - A Review *Sunil Kumar M. 1, Sonal S. 2, Adeeba Khanum 3, Samsun Nehar Rahman 4 and Nouf Bano 5 *Corresponding Author Email: drlinus1978@gmail.com
More informationA randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure
Journal of Orthodontics, Vol. 29, 2002, 31 36 SCIENTIFIC SECTION A randomized clinical trial to compare three methods of orthodontic space closure V. Dixon, M. J. F. Read, K. D. O Brien, H. V. Worthington
More informationComparative analysis of load/deflection ratios of conventional and heat-activated rectangular NiTi wires
Comparative analysis of load/deflection ratios of conventional and heat-activated rectangular NiTi wires Fabio Schemann-Miguel 1, Flávio Cotrim-Ferreira 2, Alessandra Motta Streva 3, Alexander Viégas de
More informationFrictional Properties of Self-Ligating Brackets and Low-Friction Ligatures
ISSN 1949-0119 2012 Science Publications Frictional Properties of Self-Ligating Brackets and Low-Friction Ligatures Maria Francesca Sfondrini, Danilo Fraticelli, Federico Rosti, Andrea Scribante and Paola
More informationAdvantages. Fantastic. Treatment. Finishes. 3M Self-Ligating Appliances Lateral Development System. Unitek Lateral Development Archwires
3M Self-Ligating Appliances Lateral Development System Treatment Advantages Fantastic Finishes Adhesive Coated Appliance System Adhesive Coated Appliance System Unitek Lateral Development Archwires For
More informationTooth movement can occur when the applied
ONLINE ONLY Comparison of frictional forces during the initial leveling stage in various combinations of self-ligating brackets and archwires with a custom-designed typodont system Tae-Kyung Kim, a Ki-Dal
More informationOrthodontic bracket slot dimensions as measured from entire bracket series
Original Article Orthodontic bracket slot dimensions as measured from entire bracket series Paul Brown a ; Warren Wagner b ; Hyden Choi c ABSTRACT Objective: To measure the slot dimensions of an entire
More informationExperience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-issn: 2279-0853, p-issn: 2279-0861. Volume 13, Issue 3 Ver. I. (Mar. 2014), PP 12-17 Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case
More informationAdvantages. Fantastic. systems. Together with Unitek Lateral Development Archwires, this system puts you in control to
3M Self-Ligating Appliances Lateral Development System Treatment Advantages Fantastic Finishes For orthodontic professionals who choose lateral development as a desired treatment outcome, 3M now offers
More informationTahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik 1, Tabassom Hooshmand 2*, Habibeh Farazdaghi 3, Arash Mehrabi 1 and Elham S Emadian Razavi 1
Hosseinzadeh Nik et al. Progress in Orthodontics 2013, 14:48 RESEARCH Open Access Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between
More informationSystem Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi
A Clinical Review of the MBT Versatile+ Appliance System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi Treatment Philosophy of the MBT Appliance System
More informationEffect of Sodium Fluoride Mouthwash on the Frictional Resistance of Orthodontic Wires
Original Article Effect of Sodium Fluoride Mouthwash on the Frictional Resistance of Orthodontic Wires Allahyar Geramy 1, Tabassom Hooshmand 2, Tahura Etezadi 3 1 Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry
More informationCanine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets
Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets Dr. Luis Huanca Ghislanzoni Dr. Luis Huanca received his DDS in 2006 and the MS and Specialist in Orthodontics in 2009 from the University
More informationIs nickel titanium superior to multistranded stainless steel wire in aligning crowded lower anteriors? A comparative in-vivo study.
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-issn: 2279-0853, p-issn: 2279-0861. Volume 9, Issue 3 (Jul.- Aug. 2013), PP 47-51 Is nickel titanium superior to multistranded stainless steel
More informationSurface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance
Original Article Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance Sung-Hwan Choi a ; Da-Young Kang b ; Chung Ju Hwang c ABSTRACT Objective: To quantitatively
More informationFriction between different wire bracket combinations in vitro evaluation
www.scielo.br/jaos Friction between different wire bracket combinations in vitro evaluation Tatiana Kelly da Silva FIDALGO 1, Matheus Melo PITHON 2, José Vinicius Bolognesi MACIEL 2, Ana Maria BOLOGNESE
More informationThe Loading And Unloading Properties Of Various Arch Wires As A Function Of Cross Sectional Dimension And Inter Bracket Span Width System
The Loading And Unloading roperties Of Various Arch Wires As A Function Of Cross Sectional Dimension And Inter Bracket Span Width System Authors: Thomas Mathew MDS Orthodontics, Lecturer, Faculty of Dentistry,
More informationOutline the significance of the pre-adjusted Edgewise appliance system and useful bracket variations in orthodontics
Outline the significance of the pre-adjusted Edgewise appliance system and useful bracket variations in orthodontics Dr MJ Rowland-Warmann BSc BDS (Manc) MSc Aes.Med. (Lond) MJDF RCS (Eng) GDC: 178642
More informationFrictional Forces of a Fixed, Esthetic Orthodontic Appliance System
UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-1-2012 Frictional Forces of a Fixed, Esthetic Orthodontic Appliance System Brady Michael Nance University of Nevada, Las Vegas, brady.nance@sdm.unlv.edu
More informationANTERIOR AND CANINE RETRACTION: BIOMECHANIC CONSIDERATIONS. Part One
In italiano, per favore ANTERIOR AND CANINE RETRACTION: BIOMECHANIC CONSIDERATIONS Part One Gabriele Floria DDS, Lorenzo Franchi DDS, Turi Bassarelli MD English Translation by Dr. Susan Eslambolchi & Dr.
More informationSliding mechanics in an extraction case treated with 3M Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets and the 3M MBT Appliance System.
SM 3M Health Care Academy Sliding mechanics in an extraction case treated with 3M Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets and the 3M MBT Appliance System. Dr. Gianluigi Fiorillo Dr. Gianluigi Fiorillo received
More informationAn Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K
An Effectiv ective e and Precise Method forf Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K TPA Ahmet Keles, DDS, DMSc 1 /Sedef Impar, DDS 2 Most of the time, Class II molar relationships occur due to the mesiopalatal
More informationHYCON DEVICE: A PRECISE AND CONTROLLED METHOD OF SPACE CLOSURE A CASE REPORT
HYCON DEVICE: A PRECISE AND CONTROLLED METHOD OF SPACE CLOSURE A CASE REPORT Authors: Dr Arun Kumar G a Master of Dental Surgery(Orthodontics) Associate Professor, Department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial
More informationBuccally Malposed Mesially Angulated Maxillary Canine Management
Buccally Malposed Mesially Angulated Maxillary Canine Management Suhad. H. Manhal,* Summery: Maxillary canine is an important tooth in all fields of dentistry. However, malposed upper canine is seemed
More informationPlus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience
Lotus Plus Combines Traditional Twin Bracket Treatment With Self-Ligation Convenience Designed by an Orthodontist The initial concept for the Lotus Plus Self-Ligating Bracket System started with a simple
More informationMBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D
MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D Dr. Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D, is an assistant professor in the Department of Orthodontics
More informationIJPCDR ORIGINAL RESEARCH ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
ORIGINAL RESEARCH Comparison of the Conventional Method using Intraoral Periapical with the Contemporary Imaging Technology (Spiral Computed Tomography) for the Amount of Apical Root Resorption K. V. Sujan
More informationDual Force Cuspid Retractor
CLINICAL INNOVATION 1 Matrishva B Vyas, 2 Neeraj Alladwar ABSTRACT The most time consuming stage of bicuspid extraction-based treatment is cuspid retraction. Cuspid retraction with both types of conventional
More informationThe Comparison of Space Closure Rate between Conventional and Passive Self-ligating System Using Elastomeric Chain in Maxilla
The Comparison of between Conventional and Passive Self-ligating System Using Elastomeric Chain in Maxilla Sabrina 1, Krisnawati 2 *, Benny Mulyono Soegiharto 2 1. Orthodontic Residency Program, Faculty
More informationwiirre e a a n n d d w wiirre e ffo orrms ms
wire and wire forms wire and wire forms wire and wire forms Leone orthodontic wires are available in a range of alloys and different grades of elasticity and hardness to meet any therapeutic requirements.
More informationLIMITING FACTORS AFFECTING STAGE I TREATMENT: A BIOMECHANICAL PERSPECTIVE. Christopher G. Gibson. Chapel Hill 2016
LIMITING FACTORS AFFECTING STAGE I TREATMENT: A BIOMECHANICAL PERSPECTIVE Christopher G. Gibson A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment
More informationAesthetic Brackets and Accessories
Aesthetic Brackets and Accessories Our Strength is our Service Ortho-Care s version of the MBT prescription shown in this chapter is not claimed to be a duplication, and does not in any way imply endorsement
More informationThe load/deflection characteristics of thermally activated orthodontic archwires
European Journal of Orthodontics 25 (2003) 417 421 2003 European Orthodontic Society The load/deflection characteristics of thermally activated orthodontic archwires Farnaz Parvizi and W. P. Rock School
More information(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1
(19) United States US 2005O130094A1 (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0130094A1 Graham (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 16, 2005 (54) ORTHODONTIC ACCESSORY ARCH BAR (52) U.S. Cl.... 433/20
More informationIntegrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.
Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D. Abstract The ribbon arch previously had great popularity and utility early in the 20 th century, but lost its appeal as edgewise
More informationINCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS
ORTHOdontics PGI PROBLEM SOLVING IN ORTHODONTICS INCLUDES: OVERVIEW ON CLINICAL SITUATIONS FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS MECHANOTHERAPY USED TO RESOLVE THESE SITUATIONS FACULTY: Fares
More informationA finite element analysis of the effects of archwire size on orthodontic tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics
Kawamura and Tamaya Progress in Orthodontics (2019) 20:3 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0255-8 RESEARCH Open Access A finite element analysis of the effects of archwire size on orthodontic tooth movement
More informationRESEARCH ARTICLE /jp-journals
10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1131 RESEARCH ARTICLE Parikshit Rajkumar Rao et al Evaluation and Comparison of Biomechanical Properties of Snail Loop with that of Opus Loop and Teardrop Loop for en masse Retraction
More informationDevelopment of a Wear Testing Machine for Dental Crown Application
Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 47 : 790-801 (2013) Development of a Wear Testing Machine for Dental Application Panya Aroonjarattham*, Chakrit Suvanjumrat and Ekachai Chaichanasiri ABSTRACT A three axes wear
More informationComparison of mechanical properties of beta-titanium wires between leveled and unleveled brackets: an in vitro study
Insabralde et al. Progress in Orthodontics 2014, 15:42 RESEARCH ARTICLE Comparison of mechanical properties of beta-titanium wires between leveled and unleveled brackets: an in vitro study Open Access
More informationEvaluation of Torsional Strength of Ceramic Brackets Produced by Arch Wire Twisting Moment
Evaluation of Torsional Strength of Produced by Arch Wire Twisting Moment Raghavendra S. Vhanbatte, 1 Rashmi V. Uddanwadiker, 2 Pallavi Patil 3 1 Postgraduate student, Department of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint
Cover image courtesy of K Line Europe GmbH (www.kline-europe.de) ortho Special Reprint international magazine of orthodontics 1 2017 case report Sagittal First By Dr. Luis Carrière Sagittal First Author:
More informationStudy Model-based Evaluation of Built-in Tip, Torque, and In out Characteristics of a Third-generation Preadjusted Edgewise Appliance
Rishabh Gupta et al ORIGINAL RESEARCH 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2206 Study Model-based Evaluation of Built-in Tip, Torque, and In out Characteristics of a Third-generation Preadjusted Edgewise Appliance
More informationGAC Archwire Collection
GAC Archwire Collection All the Metal That Matters Copper to Nickel and All Points In-Between Your choice in archwires is a critical decision in your quest for excellence. GAC has been recognized as a
More informationEffect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth on reduction of frictional force in sliding mechanics
Original Article THE KOREAN JOURNAL of ORTHODONTICS pissn 2234-7518 eissn 2005-372X http://dx.doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2016.46.2.73 Effect of passive self-ligating bracket placement on the posterior teeth
More informationPrediction of optimal bending angles of a running loop to achieve bodily protraction of a molar using the finite element method
Original Article THE KOREAN JOURNAL of ORTHODONTICS pissn 2234-718 eissn 200-372X https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2018.48.1.3 Prediction of optimal bending angles of a running loop to achieve bodily protraction
More informationIntroducing the Clarity SL Self-Ligating Appliance System
Introducing the Clarity SL Self-Ligating Appliance System Lunch and Learn Agenda Clarity SL Brackets Overview Consultation Benefits Bracket Positioning Benefits Bonding Benefits Leveling & Aligning Benefits
More informationVictory Series Active Self-Ligating Brackets. Reliable. and. Effective
Victory Series Active Self-Ligating Brackets Reliable and Effective Victory Series Active Self-Ligating Brackets Reliability Victory Series SL Brackets are widely accepted as an industry benchmark for
More informationSnapLink Re-Convertible Tube
SnapLink Re-Convertible Tube Background Buccal tubes are attached to the upper and lower molars to anchor the distal ends of archwires, or to attach an auxiliary wire, headgear or lip bumper, or as an
More informationTreatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD
REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS 1828 PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS
More informationWe Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops
TTCHMENTS We Give Back Ortho Technology is a proud Founder Level Partner of the merican ssociation of Orthodontists Foundation. Ortho Technology is committed to making a positive difference in the future
More informationDelta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control
Delta Force Bracket System Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control Variable Force Orthodontics The Delta Force Bracket System incorporates an advanced design that allows you to control the
More informationDental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Original Article Effect of dry heat and steam sterilization on load-deflection characteristics of -titanium wires: An in vitro study Shiva Alavi 1, Neda Sinaee 1 1 Torabinejad Dental
More informationEvaluation of frictional forces generated by different brackets and orthodontic wires
Evaluation of frictional forces generated by different brackets and orthodontic wires Khulood A. Almakhzomi, B.D.S., H.D.D. (1) Nidhal H. Ghaib, B.D.S., M.Sc. (2) ABSTRACT Background: Sliding mechanics
More informationeral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider
Bilater eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider Ahmet Keles, DDS, DMSc 1 /Binnur Pamukcu, DDS 2 /Ebru Cetinkaya Tokmak, DDS 2 Aim: To introduce a new intraoral appliance
More informationGentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector
15 CASE REPORT Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector Amit Prakash 1,O.P.Mehta 2, Kshitij Gupta 3 Swapnil Pandey 4 Deep Kumar Suryawanshi 4 1 Senior lecturer Bhopal - INDIA 2 Professor Bhopal
More informationReview of Orthodontic Archwires
Chapter 2 Review of Orthodontic Archwires 2.1 Introduction The archwire, through mechanical interaction with the bracket slots, are designed to move teeth from malocclusion to a preferred dental occlusion.
More informationMeasurement of Forces and Moments in Three- Dimensional Archwires
Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2003 Measurement of Forces and Moments in Three- Dimensional Archwires Dwight Van Buelow Virginia Commonwealth
More informationTreatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?
TURKISH JOURNAL of DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17034 CASE REPORT Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction
More information