Programme - Thursday 2 May

Transcription

1 Programme - Thursday 2 May Biomechanics, kinematics and alignment (I) Moderators: Sébastien Lustig & Ashok Rajgopal Are we restoring normal knee laxity in TKA? Nele Arnout, Belgium Posterior cruciate ligament resection in total knee arthroplasty: Effect on flexionextension gaps, mediolateral laxity, and fixed flexion deformity Sumon Huq, United Kingdom Medial bi-compartmental arthroplasty retains the anterior cruciate ligament resulting in a higher functioning gait compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty Amy Garner, United Kingdom Total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra articular deformity: Restoration of mechanical alignment using accelerometer-based navigation system Fabrizio Matassi, Italy Poor relationship between tibiofemoral and trochlear anatomic parameters Charles Rivière, United Kingdom Implant geometry and alignment driven variability in simulated TKA kinematics Bill Walter, Australia Effect of coronal alignment and joint line position on failure after TKA Thomas Luyckx, Belgium Coronal alignment in kinematic total knee arthroplasty - The 4 year results of the outliers Jonathan Phillips, United Kingdom Kinematic alignment vs. mechanical alignment in primary TKA with medial stabilized implant - One year follow-up Dragan Jeremic, Germany Patients undergoing bilateral knee arthroplasty report better outcomes in their kinematically aligned knee compared to their mechanical one Yaron Bar-Ziv, Israel

2 Biomechanics, kinematics and alignment (II) Moderators: Robert Hube & Philip Chapman-Sheath Kinematic aligned femoral rotation leads to greater patella tilt but similar clinical outcomes when compared to traditional femoral component rotation in TKA - A propensity score matched study Don Koh, Singapore Mechanical alignment tibial cuts lead to significantly more bone loss in lateral tibial plateau in varus knees - A radiological analysis Christopher Hutton, United Kingdom Sensor-driven evaluation of tibial coronal alignment: A validation study Matthias Verstraete, United States Sensor assisted balancing: Does a surgeon need the extra sense? Michael Conditt, United States Intraoperative sensor technology in orthopaedics: Where are we today? Patrick Meere, United States A quantitatively balanced knee: What cost can we accept? Alexander Gordon, United States Balancing a knee with varus angular bone cuts in Total Knee Arthroplasty Martin Roche, United States Patient satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty using technologic innovation to achieve balanced gaps Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker, United States The linked soft tissue guided technique : A Novel method for cutting the tibia while performing a kinematic total knee arthroplasty - Results of 91 consecutive cases Yaron Bar-Ziv, Israel Discussion Coffee break

3 Revision Moderators: Wolfgang Klauser & Andrea Baldini The effect of diagnosis and length of follow-up on the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty Andrew Porteous, United Kingdom Reliability of a new bone defect classification for revision TKA Maartje Belt, The Netherlands Large differences in revision rates between Danish high-volume knee arthroplasty centers are not reflected in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) before or after primary knee arthroplasty Anne Moerup-Petersen, Denmark Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in high risk patients: Can pressure negative dressing be a game changer? Oduche Igboechi, United States Biomechanical study of femoral stem length in hinged knee prosthesis Bernardo Innocenti, Belgium Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty Paul Van Rensch, The Netherlands Acceptable failure rates in 110 consecutive two-stage revision TKA procedures at long-term follow-up Katrijn Smulders, The Netherlands Improved mid-term survival rate in revision total knee arthroplasty employing a two-zones of fixation algorithm Andrea Baldini, Italy Trabecular metal cones for severe bone loss Ashok Rajgopal, India Tantalum metaphyseal cones in the management of severe bone defects in septic knee revision Giorgio Burastero, Italy Evaluation of metadiaphyseal fixation in massive bone defects in two-stage knee revision: Clinical, radiological and biomechanical study of custom device Giorgio Burastero, Italy Discussion Lunch

4 Robotics and new technologies Moderators: Johan Bellemans & Andrew Porteous The learning curve for robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty Sumon Huq, United Kingdom Learning curve and time commitment assessment in the adoption of NAVIO robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Bertrand Kaper, United States year survivorship of a randomised trial of robotic arm assisted vs manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Matthew Banger, United Kingdom A cross comparative shopping guide to robot-assisted surgical systems Patrick Meere, United States Component position accuracy in active robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty William Long, United States Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with valgus deformity Fabio Catani, Italy Improved preservation of posterior cruciate ligament function with robot assisted total knee arthroplasty Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker, United States Can we predict laxity in robotic TKA using pre-operative force-controlled laxity measurements? Jeffrey DeClaire, United States Anatomical and mechanical alignment strategies in present-day TKA surgery: What do robotics bring to the table? Philip Winnock de Grave, Belgium hour discharge in unicompartmental knee replacement using the NAVIO robotic system: A retrospective analysis Benjamin Sephton, United Kingdom Postoperative pain and opioid usage in patients undergoing robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) versus conventional TKA Jim Nevelos, United States Clinical and functional outcomes of robotic assisted bicompartmental knee arthroplasty Laura Scholl, United States Quantitative assessment of tibial contact loads form a straight leg raising test during Total Knee Arthroplasty Patrick Meere, United States Coffee break

5 Programme Friday 3 May SEROD-EKS Session Moderators: Enric Castellet & Jose A. Hernandez-Hermoso Coronal alignment: Different types, different outcomes? Sébastien Parratte, France The value of PSI in the treatment of complex TKA cases Vicenç Leon, Spain The value of navigation in important intra-articular deformities in TKA Arun Mulaji, India Patient s expectations in TKA Joan Leal, Spain Patient s outcome after UKA and TKA with personalized implants Jean-Noel Argenson, France Importance of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in TKA Pedro Hinarejos, Spain Discussion Coffee break Outcome after knee arthroplasty (I) Moderators: Chris Dodd & Francesco Benazzo High radiological severity of knee osteoarthritis predicts greater improvement in quality of life than moderate osteoarthritis one year after Total Knee Arthroplasty Yasser Rehman, Norway Influence of patella height on total knee arthroplasty: Outcomes and survival Sébastien Lustig, France The value of postoperative prosthesis alignment and patellar height measurements on standard X-rays after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does it relate to knee function after 5 years? Rachid Rassir, The Netherlands Patellar tilt and displacement after TKA compromise stair-climbing and descent Mo Saffarini, Switzerland Unique radio system in total knee prosthesis: 7 years of clinical and functional results Borja Ruiz Nieto, Spain

6 A comparison of patient reported outcome measures following total knee replacement with either the Depuy Synthes ATTUNE TM or Depuy Synthes PFCTM total knee replacement systems: A single blinded randomised controlled trial Hiren Divecha, United Kingdom Recovery patterns of patients with unilateral primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Jeroen van Egmond, The Netherlands A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the difference in patient satisfaction between three contemporary total knee designs Stefaan Van Onsem, Belgium What is the outcome of bi-cruciate versus cruciate retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty at 2-year follow-up assessed in a randomized controlled trial? Anders Troelsen, Denmark Sagittal stability of medial pivot total knee arthroplasty compared to other implant designs Bill Walter, Australia Bi-unicondylar arthroplasty restores healthy gait characteristics with higher function than Total Knee Arthroplasty Amy Garner, United Kingdom Outcome after knee arthroplasty (II) Moderators: Michel Bonnin & Jan Victor Tibial fixation of a bicruciate versus a posterior cruciate retaining TKA Petra Heesterbeek, The Netherlands Reduced aseptic loosening with a short-stem tibial component in primary cemented total knee arthroplasty William Long, United States Primary cementless total knee arthroplasty with or without stem extension: A matched comparative study of ninety-eight standard stems versus ninety-eight long stems after more than ten years of follow-up Jean-Louis Prudhon, France Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of a Modern TKA Prosthesis Compared to its Predecessor at 5 Year Follow Up: Matched Pair Analysis Chitranjan Ranawat, United States A Report of 8 cases of polyethylene spinout/dislocation in the ATTUNE cruciateretaining rotating-platform Total Knee Arthroplasty Cillian Keogh, Ireland Tissue adhesive as adjunct to staples for wound closure after knee and hip arthroplasty Rutger Thomas, The Netherlands

7 Analyzing the safety of simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty in the obese patient population Paraskevi Vivian Papas, United States Fear of movement influences performance-based outcomes after knee replacement surgery Henri De Vroey, Belgium Discussion Lunch UKA (I) Moderators: Nick London & Martin Roche Kinematically aligned medial Oxford TM UKA: An in-silico study Charles Rivière, United Kingdom High survival rate and very low wear of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty at long term - A case series of 54 cases at a mean follow-up of 17 years Sébastien Lustig, France Low revision rates with fixed-bearing partial knee arthroplasty in young patients (<60yrs) with minimum ten year follow up Ashim Mannan, United Kingdom Limited value of MRI in the preoperative assessment of lateral-compartment cartilage in potential candidates for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Wenzel Waldstein, Austria Fixed-bearing partial knee replacement with broad selection criteria Preliminary clinical and functional outcomes (a European Knee Society - supported study) Nick London, United Kingdom Preliminary results of the Persona Partial Knee (PPK) Stefano Rossi, Italy Functional and radiologic improvement after robotic-assisted lateral UKA: A comparative study Sébastien Lustig, France

8 UKA (II) Moderators: Giles Scuderi & Andrew Price Robotic-assisted Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty is associated with earlier discharge from physiotherapy and reduced length of stay compared to conventional navigated techniques Anaïs Shearman, United Kingdom Early functional rehabilitation and hospital discharge in conventional versus robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study Sumon Huq, United Kingdom Outpatient Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Selection criteria and early clinical outcomes Jeffrey DeClaire, United States A dedicated infrastructure for partial knee arthroplasty in outpatient setting: Preliminary results from a series of 60 cases Anaïs Luyet, Switzerland Effect of hospital volume on risk of revision in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Koen Koenraadt, The Netherlands Reduced bone activity in the native compartments after medial mobile-bearing UKA - A prospective SPECT/CT study Lucas Beckers, Belgium Forgotten joint score: Comparison between different types of total and unicompartmental knee replacements 1,5 and 10 year follow up Paul Nicolai, United Kingdom Discussion