Does the Spine Surgeon s Experience Affect Fracture Classification, Assessment of Stability, and Treatment Plan in Thoracolumbar Injuries?
|
|
- Patrick Ford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Rothman Institute Rothman Institute Does the Spine Surgeon s Experience Affect Fracture Classification, Assessment of Stability, and Treatment Plan in Thoracolumbar Injuries? Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran Ganga Hospital Rishimugesh Kanna Ganga Hospital Gregory D. Schroeder Thomas Jefferson University, Gregory.Schroeder@jefferson.edu Frank C. Oner University Medical Centre, Utrecht Luiz Vialle Catholic University See next page for additional authors Let us know how access to this document benefits you Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Orthopedics Commons Recommended Citation Rajasekaran, Shanmuganathan; Kanna, Rishimugesh; Schroeder, Gregory D.; Oner, Frank C.; Vialle, Luiz; Chapman, Jens R.; Dvorak, Marcel; Fehlings, Michael; Shetty, Ajoy P.; Schnake, Klaus J.; Kandziora, Frank M.; and Vaccaro, Alex R., "Does the Spine Surgeon s Experience Affect Fracture Classification, Assessment of Stability, and Treatment Plan in Thoracolumbar Injuries?" (2017). Rothman Institute. Paper This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Jefferson Digital Commons. The Jefferson Digital Commons is a service of Thomas Jefferson University's Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL). The Commons is a showcase for Jefferson books and journals, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, unique historical collections from the University archives, and teaching tools. The Jefferson Digital Commons allows researchers and interested readers anywhere in the world to learn about and keep up to date with Jefferson scholarship. This article has been accepted for inclusion in
2 Authors Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Rishimugesh Kanna, Gregory D. Schroeder, Frank C. Oner, Luiz Vialle, Jens R. Chapman, Marcel Dvorak, Michael Fehlings, Ajoy P. Shetty, Klaus J. Schnake, Frank M. Kandziora, and Alex R. Vaccaro This article is available at Jefferson Digital Commons:
3 Original Article Does the Spine Surgeon s Experience Affect Fracture Classification, Assessment of Stability, and Treatment Plan in Thoracolumbar Injuries? Global Spine Journal 2017, Vol. 7(4) ª The Author(s) 2017 Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalspermissions.nav DOI: / journals.sagepub.com/home/gsj Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, PhD 1, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, MS 1, Gregory D. Schroeder, MD 2, Frank Cumhur Oner, PhD 3, Luiz Vialle, PhD 4, Jens Chapman, MD 5, Marcel Dvorak, MD, FRCSC 6, Michael Fehlings, MD, PhD 7, Ajoy Prasad Shetty, MS 1, Klaus Schnake, PhD 8, Frank Kandziora, PhD 8, and Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD, PhD 2 Abstract Study Design: Prospective survey-based study. Objectives: The AO Spine thoracolumbar injury classification has been shown to have good reproducibility among clinicians. However, the influence of spine surgeons clinical experience on fracture classification, stability assessment, and decision on management based on this classification has not been studied. Furthermore, the usefulness of varying imaging modalities including radiographs, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the decision process was also studied. Methods: Forty-one spine surgeons from different regions, acquainted with the AOSpine classification system, were provided with 30 thoracolumbar fractures in a 3-step assessment: first radiographs, followed by CT and MRI. Surgeons classified the fracture, evaluated stability, chose management, and identified reasons for any changes. The surgeons were divided into 2 groups based on years of clinical experience as <10 years (n ¼ 12) and >10 years (n ¼ 29). Results: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in correctly classifying A1, B2, and C type fractures. Surgeons with less experience had more correct diagnosis in classifying A3 (47.2% vs 38.5% in step 1, 73.6% vs 60.3% in step 2 and 77.8% vs 65.5% in step 3), A4 (16.7% vs 24.1% in step 1, 72.9% vs 57.8% in step 2 and 70.8% vs 56.0% in step3) and B1 injuries (31.9% vs 20.7% in step 1, 41.7% vs 36.8% in step 2 and 38.9% vs 33.9% in step 3). In the assessment of fracture stability and decision on treatment, the less and more experienced surgeons performed equally. The selection of a particular treatment plan varied in all subtypes except in A1 and C type injuries. Conclusion: Surgeons experience did not significantly affect overall fracture classification, evaluating stability and planning the treatment. Surgeons with less experience had a higher percentage of correct classification in A3 and A4 injuries. Despite variations between them in classification, the assessment of overall stability and management decisions were similar between the 2 groups. Keywords thoracolumbar trauma, classification, experience, stability, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, survey Introduction Management of thoracolumbar fractures depends significantly on the assessment of fracture morphology and estimation of stability. Various fracture classification systems described so far aid in evaluating the mechanism of injury and fracture morphology. 1-4 Ultimately, fracture classification systems should guide the surgeon in determining the need for surgery and the type of surgical approach. However, none of the classification systems described to date have been able to be simple 1 Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu India 2 Thomas Jefferson University and the Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA 3 University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands 4 Catholic University, Curitiba, Brazil 5 Harborview Medical Centre, Seattle, WA, USA 6 Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 7 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 8 Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany Corresponding Author: Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran, Department of Orthopaedics and Spine Surgery, Ganga Hospital, No. 313, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. rajasekaran.orth@gmail.com This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (
4 310 Global Spine Journal 7(4) but also be comprehensive in their evaluation. Therefore, apart from classification systems, spine surgeons have relied on different information acquired from imaging modalities including radiographs, Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to guide their treatment. The earliest classification systems used plain radiographs alone to assess the extent and severity of injury. 1,2 CT provides the best information with respect to bony injury and has been the major imaging modality used in evaluating spinal trauma. 5 MRI provides visualization of injury to the discoligamentous complex and to the neurologic elements, both of which have been acknowledged and incorporated into more recent classification systems. 6,7 Although our knowledge about thoracolumbar fractures has improved in the past few decades, there remains ongoing controversy regarding the ideal classification to evaluate stability and guide appropriate treatment. Recently, the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma developed the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System based on CT images. Studies have shown good intra- and interobserver reliability for this classification. 8 Apart from reliability and reproducibility, a good classification should be easy to understand and to follow, and hence should have good reproducibility irrespective of the surgeon s experience. In this study, we evaluated how surgeon s experience affected the reproducibility of fracture classification according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System. We also determined the influence of surgeon s experience on the assessment of stability and on treatment decision-making for different fracture subtypes, based on evaluating conventional radiographs (CR), CT, and MRI. Material and Methods Institutional review board approval from the principal investigator s institution was acquired before conducting the study. A complete set of images (anteroposterior and lateral CR, axial, sagittal, and coronal CT images and sagittal and axial MR images) of 30 patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma of varying severity were selected and classified based on the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System. The classification is a morphologically based classification with 3 major types: type A compression injury, type B tension band injury, and type C translational injury. The fractures were classified by 2 spine surgeons and a radiologist, experienced in the AOSpine Classification System (interobserver reliability >80%), which provided the reference standard to compare and assess the results provided by the participants. The 30 cases for evaluation had a fair representation of all fracture subtypes except for A2 and B3 subtypes. A group of 41 volunteer AOSpine members from different geographic areas participated in the study. In particular, 14 surgeons were from Asia-Pacific region, 12 from Latin America, 7 from the Middle East, 5 from Europe, 2 from North America, and 1 from Africa. A questionnaire was sent to the study participants and the assessment of the images was performed in 3 steps. In the first step, all the participants were provided with a short clinical description together with AP and lateral CRs of the patients and asked to answer questions regarding fracture classification, stability and the type of treatment and the need for further investigations. For the type of management, the following options were provided to the participants: conservative treatment, anterior only decompression and fixation, combined anterior and posterior stabilization, posterior short segment fixation and posterior long segment fixation. After completing this first questionnaire, a set of axial, coronal and sagittal CT images of the affected region was provided and the participants were asked to answer the same set of questions. Any change in the assessment of fracture classification, stability, need and type of surgical treatment was documented by the participant. The reasons for change in fracture classification was also documented as one of the following: CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch, CT showed fracture of posterior wall, CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body, CT showed instability features not seen in CR and undefined. After completion of the second step, a set of MRI images including axial and sagittal T1 and T2 images of the fracture were provided in the last part of the survey and similar questions were asked as in the first 2 steps. Surgeon experience was calculated as years of experience and grouped into 2 levels: less than 10 years or 11 and more years of experience. Descriptive statistics were performed to describe differences according to surgeon s experience in the percentage of correctly classified fractures, in the evaluation of fracture stability and in fracture management. Differences in the assessments by methodology of evaluation (CR, CT, and MRI) were described. McNemar test was used to determine treatment changes between CR and CT and subsequently between CT and MRI. Level of significance was set at a ¼.05 and a P value less than.05 indicates a significant change in evaluation. The statistical analysis was performed using the software SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Results Forty-one participants analyzed 30 cases amounting to a total of 1230 assessments. The participants were classified into 2 groups as less experienced (<10 years after starting spine practice, n ¼ 12) and more experienced (>10 years, n ¼ 29). Fracture Type Assessment As per the Reference Standard, 40% (12/30) were classified as type A, 40% (12/30) as type B, and 20% (6/30) as type C morphology. The classification of the fractures by the participants in each of the 3 steps has been described in the part 1 of the study. 9 In short, more fractures initially classified as type A fractures were changed to type B fractures based on CT. With MRI, the assessments remained unchanged. Type C fractures were unique in that correct classification by radiographs alone was possible and CT or MRI did not add extra information.
5 Rajasekaran et al 311 Table 1. Frequency of Correct Assessments (According to Gold Standard) by the 2 Groups of Surgeons for the 3 Different Imaging Modalities. a Gold Standard Classification Radiographs Computed Tomography Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4-10 Years 11þ Years 4-10 Years 11þ Years 4-10 Years 11þ Years A1 16 (66.7) 34 (58.6) 15 (62.5) 38 (65.5) 16 (66.7) 39 (67.2) A3 34 (47.2) 67 (38.5) 53 (73.6) 105 (60.3) 56 (77.8) 114 (65.5) A4 8 (16.7) 28 (24.1) 35 (72.9) 67 (57.8) 34 (70.8) 65 (56.0) B1 23 (31.9) 36 (20.7) 30 (41.7) 64 (36.8) 28 (38.9) 59 (33.9) B2 18 (25.0) 48 (27.6) 34 (47.2) 82 (47.1) 39 (54.2) 100 (57.5) C 66 (91.7) 155 (89.1) 70 (97.2) 163 (93.7) 70 (97.2) 163 (93.7) a Values are given as n (%). Table 2. Assessment of Fracture Stability Based on the 3 Imaging Modalities by the 2 Groups of Surgeons. Gold Standard Classification 4-10 Years 11þ Years Radiographs CT MRI Radiographs CT MRI Injury Is Stable Injury Is Stable A1 21 (87.5) 20 (83.3) 21 (87.5) 50 (86.2) 51 (87.9) 54 (93.1) A3 43 (59.7) 37 (51.4) 42 (58.3) 106 (60.9) 79 (45.4) 85 (48.9) A4 20 (41.7) 7 (14.6) 6 (12.5) 43 (37.1) 15 (12.9) 19 (16.4) B1 22 (30.6) 11 (15.3) 9 (12.5) 46 (26.4) 15 (8.6) 14 (8.0) B2 8 (11.1) 2 (2.8) 3 (4.2) 26 (14.9) 16 (9.2) 12 (6.9) C 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (1.7) 2 (1.1) 4 (2.3) Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. a Values are given as n (%). Variations Based on Surgeons Experience Table 1 shows the percentage of correct assessments (according to Reference Standard) by radiographs, CT, and MRI. For A1, B2, and C fractures, the percentage of correctly classified fractures were similar between the more and less experienced surgeons for all the 3 evaluations (radiographs, CT, and MRI). For A3 fractures, surgeons with less experience achieved a higher percentage of correctly classified fractures for all 3 evaluations. For A4 fractures, the less experienced surgeons showed a lower percentage of correct assessments based on radiograph evaluation, but after CT and MRI evaluation, they had a higher percentage of correctly classified fractures (73% vs 58% in CT and 71% vs 56% in MRI). For B1 fractures, surgeons with less experience also had a higher percentage of correctly classified fractures for all 3 evaluations. Evaluation of Fracture Stability and Influence of Surgeon s Experience Based on radiographs, 68.5% of cases were initially labeled as unstable by the participants (Table 2). This percentage increased after the CT evaluation to 79.3%. Exceptions were A1 and C fractures, where the percentages remained the same. Despite the variations on the classification of the fractures, less and more experienced surgeons tended to agree well on the assessment of fracture stability in all subtypes. In subtypes A1, A3, A4, and C fractures, a similar percentage of more and less experienced surgeons classified the fractures as stable. In subtype B1 fractures, the assessment of stability was similar between the groups after radiographic assessment. But after additional CT and MRI, less experienced surgeons tended to classify more fractures as stable when compared with more experienced surgeons. In type B2 fractures, the less experienced surgeons classified more fractures as unstable as compared with more experienced surgeons. Decision on Need for Surgery and Variations Based on Experience The percentage of cases that were deemed to require surgical fixation based on plain radiographs was 72%; this increased to 81.7% with CT images (P <.0001). The assessment for need of surgery did not change after an MRI (P ¼.77). For C fractures and B2 fractures, the vast majority of the cases were classified as needing surgery (>90% in all 3 imaging modalities) (Table 3). For A1, B2, and C, the percentage of fractures classified to need surgery remained approximately the same in the first 2 steps of assessment. For A3, A4, and B1 fractures, the percentage of fractures classified to need surgery increased after CT evaluation compared with plain radiographs. No differences were observed based on the surgeon s experience on the need of surgery in any fracture subtype, except for type A3
6 312 Global Spine Journal 7(4) Table 3. Percentage of Surgeons Assessments That Indicated the Need for Surgery Based on the 3 Imaging Modalities. Subtype Total Participants Surgeons of Experience 4-10 Years Surgeons of Experience 11þ Years Radiographs CT MRI Radiographs CT MRI Radiographs CT MRI A A A B B C Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. a Values are given as percentage. where more experienced surgeons tended to perform surgery after CT and MRI (Table 3). Decision on Treatment Plan and Variations Based on Experience The decision to select a particular treatment plan differed for each fracture subtype depending on the surgeon s experience (Table 4). For A1 fractures, the clearly predominant choice of treatment was the conservative treatment in both groups irrespective of the type of investigation. For A3 and A4 fractures, it seemed that the surgeons did not have a clear preference between the different surgery types. Based on radiographs, 64.2% patients were initially planned for conservative treatment by the more-experienced surgeons in A3 fractures (Table 4). This reduced to 41.9% after providing the CT images. They changed their decision and felt that more patients required surgical intervention after evaluating CT images. But the less experienced did not change their decision on conservative treatment after CT and MRI images. In A4 fractures too, the management decisions varied between the 2 groups of surgeons. In the first step based on radiographs, less-experienced surgeons did not opt for combined anterior-posterior surgery as a treatment option in any of the patients (0%), while the more experienced surgeons planned it in 32.4% of patients. After evaluating CT images, the less experienced surgeons felt the need for combined anterior-posterior surgery in 10% patients whereas the more experienced surgeons opted for less percentage of combined approach surgeries (20% only) after CT imaging. For B1 fractures, the 2 surgical treatments that were chosen most frequently were either short or long segment fixation. The more experienced surgeons chose the posterior short segment fixation more often than the less experienced surgeons. For B2 fractures, less experienced surgeons chose a posterior long fixation construct (>46% of cases), while the more experienced surgeons chose most frequently a posterior short surgery (45% of cases). For C fractures, both groups of surgeons mainly chose a posterior long fixation construct as the preferred treatment (more than 70% of assessments). Only very few of the surgeons chose a conservative treatment for both B2 and C fractures in any of the assessment. Reasons for Change of Decision on Treatment Plan and Variations Based on Experience The reasons for a change of decision either in the classification or management was also quite variable for the different subtypes. A1 and C type fractures showed little changes in decision in the three steps of evaluation. For A3 fractures, the reason for a change in management or classification provided most frequently was CT showed fracture of posterior wall in both groups of surgeons (41.4% for the less experienced group and 50.0% in the more experienced group) (Table 5). For A4 fractures, the most frequently provided reason for a change in management/classification inbothgroupwas CTshowed fresh fractures of vertebral body (30.0% and 34.1%, respectively). For B1 and B2 fractures, the most frequently specified reasons for a change in evaluation were CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch and CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology. Discussion Thoracolumbar spinal fractures are a heterogeneous group of injuries and several classifications have been developed in the past 30 years to help in communication, identifying stability, and develop indications for surgical management. In this international study, we studied the influence of the surgeon s experience in accurately classifying a fracture based on the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System, and in the assessment of fracture stability and planning of treatment. It was observed that for the most stable (A1) and the unstable (B2 and C) injuries, both the less and more experienced surgeons had similar percentage of correct classifications, irrespective of the type of imaging modality. For A3 and B1 injuries, surgeons with less experience had more correct classifications in all the three steps. Both groups of surgeons had poor diagnosis of A4 fractures based on radiographs, but more than 70% of less experienced surgeons correctly diagnosed A4 injuries after CT and MRI. Kepler et al 10 studied the reliability of AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System among 100 spine surgeons by providing the CT images of 25 patients with thoracolumbar injury. It was observed that the kappa values describing interobserver agreement were 0.80 for type A injuries, 0.68 for type B injuries and 0.72 for type C
7 Rajasekaran et al 313 Table 4. Assessment of Type of Treatment for Different Fracture Subtypes Based on the 3 Imaging Modalities by the 2 Groups of Surgeons (Only Assessments Correctly Classified According to Gold Standard Are Included). Classification Type of Treatment 4-10 Years of Experience 11þ Years of Experience Radiographs (%) CT (%) MRI (%) Radiographs (%) CT (%) MRI (%) A1 n ¼ 16 n ¼ 15 n ¼ 16 n ¼ 34 n ¼ 38 n ¼ 39 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Others/not defined A3 n ¼ 34 n ¼ 53 n ¼ 56 n ¼ 67 n ¼ 105 n ¼ 114 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Other/Not defined A4 n ¼ 8 n ¼ 35 n ¼ 34 n ¼ 28 n ¼ 67 n ¼ 65 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Not defined B1 n ¼ 23 n ¼ 30 n ¼ 28 n ¼ 36 n ¼ 64 n ¼ 59 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Other/ Not defined B2 n ¼ 18 n ¼ 34 n ¼ 39 n ¼ 48 n ¼ 82 n ¼ 100 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Other/Not defined C n ¼ 66 n ¼ 70 n ¼ 70 n ¼ 155 n ¼ 163 n ¼ 163 Conservative Anterior only Anterior and posterior Posterior short Posterior long Other/Not defined Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. injuries, all representing substantial reliability. The lowest level of agreement for specific subtypes was for fracture subtype A4 (k ¼ 0.19). In this study, though A4 injuries were poorly diagnosed in radiographs, a higher percentage of surgeons diagnosed it in CT. This could probably be due to the inability to visualize the posterior vertebral wall and identify coronal split fractures ( pincer injuries) in radiographs. Not surprisingly, the simplest and the most unstable injuries were diagnosed consistently between both groups of surgeons. Interestingly, surgeons with less experience (<10 years) were better at diagnosing A3, A4, and B1 injuries than the more experienced colleagues. This is similar to the results observed in previous studies. Sadiqi et al 11 studied the influence of spine surgeons experience on the classification and intraobserver reliability of AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System among a group of 100 spine surgeons. The participants were divided into 3 groups based on their experience as <10 years, 10 to 20 years, and >20 years. They observed that though all 3 surgeon subgroups demonstrated excellent reliability (k ¼ ) for fracture morphology type regardless of subtype, the fractures were most frequently misclassified by the most experienced surgeons. The possible explanation given by the
8 314 Global Spine Journal 7(4) Table 5. Frequency of Surgeons Reasons for Their Change in Evaluation (Management or Classification) of Fractures After Computed Tomography (CT) in Comparison to Gold Standard Classification. Gold Standard Classification Reason 4-10 Years of Experience; n (%) 11þ Years of Experience; n (%) A1 n ¼ 2 n ¼ 9 CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 1 (50.0) 2 (22.2) Not defined 1 (50.0) 5 (55.6) Other 0 (0) 2 (22.2) A3 n ¼ 29 n ¼ 66 CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch 1 (3.4) 2 (3.0) CT showed fracture of posterior wall 12 (41.4) 33 (50.0) CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 5 (17.2) 4 (6.1) CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology 2 (6.9) 5 (7.6) Not defined 6 (20.7) 17 (25.8) Other 3 (10.3) 5 (7.6) A4 n ¼ 30 n ¼ 41 CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch 1 (3.3) 2 (4.9) CT showed fracture of posterior wall 5 (16.7) 3 (7.3) CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 9 (30.0) 14 (34.1) CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology 4 (13.3) 12 (29.3) Not defined 8 (26.7) 7 (17.1) Other 3 (10.0) 3 (7.3) B1 n ¼ 20 n ¼ 44 CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch 11 (55.0) 18 (40.9) CT showed fracture of posterior wall 0 (0) 1 (2.3) CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 2 (10.0) 0 (0) CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology 3 (15.0) 8 (18.2) Not defined 3 (15.0) 15 (34.1) Other 1 (5.0) 2 (4.5) B2 n ¼ 18 n ¼ 48 CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch 7 (38.9) 18 (37.5) CT showed fracture of posterior wall 1 (5.6) 2 (4.2) CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 1 (5.6% 0 (0) CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology 5 (27.8) 14 (29.2) Not defined 2 (11.1) 11 (22.9) Other 2 (11.1) 3 (6.3) C n ¼ 9 n ¼ 25 CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch 2 (22.2) 3 (12.0) CT showed fracture of posterior wall 1 (11.1) 0 (0) CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body 0 (0) 2 (8.0) CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology 2 (22.2) 7 (28.0) Not defined 2 (22.2) 7 (28.0) Other 2 (22.2) 6 (24.0) authors for this paradox was that the more experienced surgeons are less inclined to learn and follow a new classification system due to their longer experience with older systems. The assessment of fracture stability and decision on operative treatment is a complex decision, based on patient s age, presence of comorbidities, associated spinal conditions, neurological status, timing of presentation, and the fracture morphology Among these factors, fracture morphology is the most important factor that determines bony stability. Most classifications are predominantly morphological based on information acquired in radiographs and CT. The AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System used in the present study is a morphologically based classification with 3 major types: type A compression injury, type B tension band injury, and type C translational injury, with subtypes in A and B. Despite the variations on the classification of the fractures, less and more experienced surgeons tended to agree well on the assessment of fracture stability and surgical decision making in all subtypes, with only slight differences. Similarly, no differences were observed based on the surgeon s experience on the need for surgical stabilization for any fracture subtype. Once a decision on surgical intervention is made, the type of approach and extent of surgical fixation can vary depending on the surgeon s training, preference toward a technique, personal experience, geographical variations, and the patient s ability to tolerate a particular procedure. Different surgical approaches and techniques have been described for thoracolumbar fractures, including posterior, anterior, and combined
9 Rajasekaran et al 315 approaches However, scientific evidence is lacking to support the selection of one surgical technique as advantageous over the other. In the present study, surgeons had a clear decision on the type of treatment for A1 and C fractures irrespective of their experience. But for A3, A4 fractures, there was no clear preference for the surgeons to select a particular technique. For B1 fractures, posterior short and posterior long segment fixation surgeries were equally preferred. The more experienced surgeons chose the posterior short surgery more often than the less experienced surgeons. In B2 fractures, the less experienced surgeons probably perceived more instability and selected posterior long surgery in 50% of the assessments followed by posterior short and combined anterior and posterior surgery. On the other hand, the more experienced surgeons chose most frequently a posterior short surgery (40.2%) followed by posterior long and combined surgeries. B1 and B2 injuries indicate disruption of the posterior tension band and hence posterior pedicle screw fixation was preferred. In the absence of clear criteria to fix long segments and reconstruct anteriorly, the variations in the decisions chosen by the surgeons may not be significant. Similarly, the reasons for a change of decision either in the classification or management in each of the assessment steps was also quite versatile for the different subtypes. Expectedly, A1 and C type fractures showed little changes in decision in the 3 steps of evaluation. Since the diagnosis of A3 and A4 fractures depend on critical assessment of posterior vertebral wall, the reasons provided most frequently were CT showed fractures of posterior wall and CT showed fresh fractures of vertebral body for a change in management or classification. B1 and B2 fractures have posterior tension bend failure and consequently the most frequently specified reasons for a change in evaluation were CT showed additional fractures of posterior arch and CT showed instability features not seen in plain radiology. Conclusion There were no differences, based on experience, in correctly classifying A1, B2, and C type injuries according to the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System. Surgeons with less experience were more accurate in classifying A3, A4 and B1 injuries. About 30% to 50% more assessments were made correctly in A3 and A4 injuries after provision of CT images, indicating the importance of CT in this classification. In the assessment of fracture stability and decision on operative treatment, the less and more experienced surgeons performed equally without much difference. The selection of a particular treatment plan varied in all subtypes except the most stable A1 and unstable C type injuries, where there was uniformity between the 2 groups. Acknowledgments AOSpine is a clinical division of the AO Foundation an independent medically guided nonprofit organization. The AOSpine Knowledge Forums are pathology focused working groups acting on behalf of AOSpine in their domain of scientific expertise. Each forum consists of a steering committee of up to 10 international spine experts who meet on a regular basis to discuss research, assess the best evidence for current practices, and formulate clinical trials to advance spine care worldwide. Study support is provided directly through AOSpine s Research Department and AO s Clinical Investigation and Documentation Unit. Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. References 1. Holdsworth F. Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52: Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8: McAfee PC, Yuan HA, Lasda NA. The unstable burst fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1982;7: Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994;3: McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19: Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Hurlbert RJ, et al. Surgical decision making for unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries: results of a consensus panel review by the Spine Trauma Study Group. JSpinalDisord Tech. 2006;19:1-10. doi: /01.bsd Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Schweitzer KM Jr, et al. Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiography. Spine J. 2007;7: doi: /j.spinee Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38: doi: /brs.0b013e3182a8a Rajasekaran S, Vaccaro A, Kanna RM, et al. The value of CT and MRI in the classification and assessment of stability in thoracolumbar spinal injuries [published online June 1, 2016]. Eur Spine J. doi: /s Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, et al. Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naive spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25: doi: /s Sadiqi S, Oner FC, Dvorak MF, Aarabi B, Schroeder GD, Vaccaro AR. The influence of spine surgeons experience on the classification and intraobserver reliability of the novel AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System an international study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40:E1250-E1256. doi: /BRS
10 316 Global Spine Journal 7(4) 12. Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD. Questionnaire survey of spine surgeons on the use of methylprednisolone for acute spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31: E250-E253. doi: /01.brs c. 13. Weinstein JN, Collalto P, Lehmann TR. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated conservatively: a long-term follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13: Fehlings MG, Perrin RG. The role and timing of early decompression for cervical spinal cord injury: update with a review of recent clinical evidence. Injury. 2005;36(suppl 2):B13-B26. doi: /j.injury Guven O, Kocaoglu B, Bezer M, Aydin N, Nalbantoglu U. The use of screw at the fracture level in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22: doi: /BSD.0b013e Mahar A, Kim C, Wedemeyer M, et al. Short-segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32: doi: /BRS.0b013e318067dd Haas N, Blauth M, Tscherne H. Anterior plating in thoracolumbar spine injuries. Indication, technique, and results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16(3 suppl):s100-s Kaneda K, Taneichi H, Abumi K, Hashimoto T, Satoh S, Fujiya M. Anterior decompression and stabilization with the Kaneda device for thoracolumbar burst fractures associated with neurological deficits. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79: Payer M. Unstable burst fractures of the thoraco-lumbar junction: treatment by posterior bisegmental correction/fixation and staged anterior corpectomy and titanium cage implantation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148: doi: /s Been HD, Bouma GJ. Comparison of two types of surgery for thoraco-lumbar burst fractures: combined anterior and posterior stabilisation vs. posterior instrumentation only. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141:
Research Knowledge Forum Trauma Q3 Report
Research Knowledge Forum Trauma 2015-Q3 Report Steering committee Alex Vaccaro (Chairman) Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia, USA Start of Term: 01 Apr 2013 End of Term: 30 Jun 2016 Jens Chapman
More informationReliability of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS)
Editorial Page 1 of 5 Reliability of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system and thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) Jetan H. Badhiwala, Michael G. Fehlings
More informationA Worldwide Analysis of the Reliability and Perceived Importance of an Injury to the Posterior Ligamentous Complex in AO Type A Fractures
378 Original Article GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL THIEME A Worldwide Analysis of the Reliability and Perceived Importance of an Injury to the Posterior Ligamentous Complex in AO Type A Fractures Gregory D. Schroeder
More informationClassification of Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries
Classification of Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries Guillem Saló Bru 1 IMAS. Hospitals del Mar i de l Esperança. ICATME. Institut Universitari Dexeus USP. UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA Objectives of classification
More informationThoracolumbar fractures. Treatment options. A long trip.
Thoracolumbar fractures. Treatment options. A long trip. MIS SURGERY. WHY NOT? Murcia. October 5, 2012. Dr. Pedro Cortés García. Spinal Unit. Orthopaedic department. Canary Islands University Hospital
More informationAOSpine Severity. This. Disclaimer:
AOSpine Classification and Injury Severity System for Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracolumbarr Spine This is the present form of the classification and injury severity system the AOSpine Knowledge Forum
More informationfactor for identifying unstable thoracolumbar fractures. There are clinical and radiological criteria
NMJ-Vol :2/ Issue:1/ Jan June 2013 Case Report Medical Sciences Progressive subluxation of thoracic wedge compression fracture with unidentified PLC injury Dr.Thalluri.Gopala krishnaiah* Dr.Voleti.Surya
More informationAO CLASSIFICATIONS THORACO-LUMBAR SPINAL INJURIES
AO CLASSIFICATIONS THORACO-LUMBAR SPINAL INJURIES T H E A O / A S I F ( A R B E I T S G E M E I N S C H A F T F Ü R O S T E O S Y N T H E S E F R A G E N / A S S O C I A T I O N F O R T H E S T U D Y O
More informationSUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE TRAUMA- DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT
SUBAXIAL CERVICAL SPINE TRAUMA- DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT 1 Anatomy 3 columns- Anterior, middle and Posterior Anterior- ALL, Anterior 2/3 rd body & disc. Middle- Posterior 1/3 rd of body & disc, PLL Posterior-
More informationDiagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar vertebral fractures
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting posterior ligamentous complex injury in thoracolumbar vertebral fractures Poster No.: C-1726 Congress: ECR 2011 Type: Scientific Exhibit Authors: E. Aguirre, P.
More informationOriginal Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2016;8:
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2016;8:71-77 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2016.8.1.71 More than 5-Year Follow-up Results of Two- Level and Three-Level Posterior Fixations of Thoracolumbar
More informationDelayed surgery in neurologically intact patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures: to reduce pain and improve quality of life
Original Study Delayed surgery in neurologically intact patients affected by thoraco-lumbar junction burst fractures: to reduce pain and improve quality of life Lorenzo Nigro 1, Roberto Tarantino 1, Pasquale
More informationThe Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 2 The Swedish Neuroscience Institute; 3
clinical article J Neurosurg Spine 24:332 339, 2016 Is there a regional difference in morphology interpretation of A3 and A4 fractures among different cultures? Gregory D. Schroeder, MD, 1 Christopher
More informationClassification? Classification system should be: Comprehensive Usable Accurate Predictable Able to guide intervention
Moderator: Dr. P.S. Chandra Dr. Dr Deepak Gupta Classification? Classification system should be: Comprehensive Usable Accurate Predictable Able to guide intervention A precise, comprehensive, ideal
More informationSubaxial Cervical Spine Trauma
Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Pooria Salari, MD Assistant Professor Of Orthopaedics Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri, USA Initial Evaluation
More informationManifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: epidural pannus and atlantoaxial subluxation resulting in basilar invagination.
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Faculty Papers Department of Rehabilitation Medicine 1-1-2012 Manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis: epidural
More informationNeurologic improvement after thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar spinal cord (conus medullaris) injuries
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers Department of Orthopaedic Surgery 1-2011 Neurologic improvement after thoracic, thoracolumbar, and
More informationFractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine and thoracolumbar transition
Most spinal column injuries occur in the thoracolumbar transition, the area between the lower thoracic spine and the upper lumbar spine; over half of all vertebral fractures involve the 12 th thoracic
More informationTHORACO-LUMBAR SPINE TRAUMA NORDIC TRAUMA COURSE 2016, AARHUS
THORACO-LUMBAR SPINE TRAUMA NORDIC TRAUMA COURSE 2016, AARHUS Ken F. Linnau, MD, MS Emergency Radiology Harborview Medical Center University of Washington Seattle, WA Thanks to Quynh T. Nguyen, MHS, PA-C
More informationThe Development of a Universally Accepted Sacral Fracture Classification: A Survey of AOSpine and AOTrauma Members.
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Rothman Institute Rothman Institute 11-1-2016 The Development of a Universally Accepted Sacral Fracture Classification: A Survey of AOSpine and AOTrauma
More informationAlthough unstable thoracolumbar injuries are a common
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Anterior-Only Stabilization of Three-Column Thoracolumbar Injuries Rick C. Sasso, MD, Natalie M. Best, BS, Thomas M. Reilly, MD, and Robert A. McGuire, Jr., MD Objective: The optimal treatment
More informationA New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries
A New Classification of Thoracolumbar Injuries The Importance of Injury Morphology, the Integrity of the Posterior Ligamentous Complex, and Neurologic Status Alexander R. Vaccaro, MD,* Ronald A. Lehman,
More informationTreatment Algorithm For Unstable Burst Fracture
Symposium International Journal of Spine 2016 Sep-Dec;1(2):27-32 Treatment Algorithm For Unstable Burst Fracture 1 1 1 Ketan Khurjekar, Himanshu Kulkarni, Mayur Kardile Introduction Burst fractures comprise
More informationPosterior Instrumentation of Thoracolumbar Fracture
Posterior Instrumentation of Thoracolumbar Fracture Jin-Young Lee, MD, and Gab-Lae Kim, MD Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Abstract The thoracolumbar
More informationComplete Fracture-Dislocation of the Thoracolumbar Spine
122 CASE REPORT Complete Fracture-Dislocation of the Thoracolumbar Spine with No Critical Neurological Deficit : A Case Report Kosuke Sugiura 1), Toshinori Sakai 2), Keisuke Adachi 1), Kazumasa Inoue 1),
More informationFractures of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine
A spinal fracture is a serious injury. Nader M. Hebela, MD Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons http://orthodoc.aaos.org/hebela Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi Neurological
More informationASJ. Magnification Error in Digital Radiographs of the Cervical Spine Against Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements. Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal Asian Spine Clinical Journal Study Asian Spine J 2013;7(4):267-272 Magnification http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2013.7.4.267 error in cervical spine 267 Magnification Error in Digital
More informationThe Challenges of Managing Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries
The Challenges of Managing Spine and Spinal Cord Injuries An Evolving Consensus and Opportunities for Change Michael G. Fehlings, MD, PhD, FRCS(C), FACS,* Jefferson R. Wilson, MD,* Marcel F. Dvorak, MD,
More information102 Results RESULTS. Age Mean=S.D Range 42= years -84 years Number % <30 years years >50 years
102 Results RESULTS A total of 50 cases were studied 39 males and 11females.Their age ranged between 16 years and 84 years (mean 42years). T1 and T2WI were acquired for all cases in sagittal and axial
More informationA rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint
J Orthop Sci (2012) 17:189 193 DOI 10.1007/s00776-011-0082-y CASE REPORT A rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint Kei Shinohara Shigeru Soshi
More informationCombined Anterior-Posterior Surgery Versus Posterior Surgery for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature
The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 2010, 4, 93-100 93 Open Access Combined Anterior-Posterior Surgery Versus Posterior Surgery for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature Pim P.
More informationThoracolumbar spine trauma classifications: evolution or more confusion
Thoracolumbar spine trauma classifications: evolution or more confusion Poster No.: C-1713 Congress: ECR 2012 Type: Educational Exhibit Authors: J. P. Salazar, J. Halaburda Berni, C. Torrents, L. Casas;
More informationVAriation. Orthotics and Me (?surgeons) Greg Etherington Spine Surgeon. Orthopaedic & Neurosurgery backgrounds. Subspeciality training
Orthotics and Me (?surgeons) Greg Etherington Spine Surgeon Orthopaedic & Neurosurgery backgrounds Subspeciality training spine, upper limb, trauma, pelvis. What do you do in spine? Lumbar Cervical Trauma
More informationUniversity of Groningen. Thoracolumbar spinal fractures Leferink, Vincentius Johannes Maria
University of Groningen Thoracolumbar spinal fractures Leferink, Vincentius Johannes Maria IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from
More informationPott s kyphosis. University Affiliated Sixth People s Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai , P.
QJM Advance Access published November 17, 2014 Pott s kyphosis Author Names: Yi Zhang, Yong-Sheng Yu, Zheng-Hao Tang and Guo-Qing Zang Author Affiliations: Department of Infectious Diseases, Shanghai Jiao
More informationPRELIMINARY PROGRAMME
MODULE 4 TRAUMA 18-19 June 2018 PRELIMINARY PROGRAMME QUICK FACTS WHEN: 18 & 19 June 2018 WHERE: Strasbourg, France IRCAD/EITS 1 Place de l Hôpital 67091 Strasbourg, France MAXIMUM ATTENDEES: 40 delegates
More informationASJ. A Rare Hyperextension Injury in Thoracic Spine Presenting with Delayed Paraplegia. Asian Spine Journal. Introduction
sian Spine Journal 126 Dong-Eun Case Shin Report et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2013.7.2.126 Rare Hyperextension Injury in Thoracic Spine Presenting with Delayed Paraplegia Dong-Eun Shin, Ki-Sik
More informationPostero-lateral approach with open view vertebroplasty - eggshell technique
Romanian Neurosurgery (2013) XX 4: 357-368 357 Postero-lateral approach with open view vertebroplasty - eggshell technique E.Fl. Exergian 1, I.Fl. Luca-Husti 2, D. Şerban 1 1 Spine Surgery Department,
More informationJ of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eissn , pissn / Vol. 4/ Issue 34/ Apr 27, 2015 Page 5797
THE CORRELATION OF RADIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND VOLITIONAL VOIDING IN THORACO-LUMBAR FRACTURES AND SPINAL INJURY Mathangi Santhosh Kumar 1, Aastha 2, David Mohan 3, Suranjan Bhattacharji 4 HOW TO CITE
More informationCLINICAL ARTICLE. Page 68 / SA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL Winter 2009
Page 68 / SA ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL Winter 2009 C L I N I C A L A RT I C L E Short-segment posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar fractures as standalone treatment J Davis, Registrar, Department of Orthopaedics,
More informationManagement of thoracolumbar spine trauma An overview
Symposium ICL 2014 Management of thoracolumbar spine trauma An overview S Rajasekaran, Rishi Mugesh Kanna, Ajoy Prasad Shetty Abstract Thoracolumbar spine fractures are common injuries that can result
More informationStage Operation for Unstable Lumbar Spine Fracture- Dislocation with Incomplete Paraplegia: A Case Series
C a s e R e p o r t J. of Advanced Spine Surgery Volume 2, Number 2, pp 60~65 Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery JASS Stage Operation for Unstable Lumbar Spine Fracture- Dislocation with Incomplete Paraplegia:
More informationSubaxial Cervical Spine Trauma. Introduction. Anatomic Considerations 7/23/2018
Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Sheyan J. Armaghani, MD Florida Orthopedic Institute Assistant Professor USF Dept of Orthopedics Introduction Trauma to the cervical spine accounts for 5 of all spine injuries
More information5. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco,
CONGRESS OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES ON THE EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH THORACOLUMBAR SPINE TRAUMA: CLASSIFICATION OF INJURY Sponsored by: Congress
More informationThe Relationship between Superior Disc-Endplate Complex Injury and Correction Loss in Young Adult Patients with Thoracolumbar Stable Burst Fracture
Original Article Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2017;9:465-471 https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.465 The Relationship between Superior Disc-Endplate Complex Injury and Correction Loss in Young Adult
More informationPosterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical spine bilateral facet dislocations
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers Department of Orthopaedic Surgery November 2005 Posterior longitudinal ligament status in cervical
More informationSpinal Cord (2011) 49, & 2011 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved /11 $
(2011) 49, 573 579 & 2011 International Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/11 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Posterior/anterior combined surgery for thoracolumbar burst fracturesfposterior
More information2 nd Annual Spine Trauma Summit May 20-21, 2016 at the Seattle Science Foundation AGENDA. Friday, May 20, 2016
2 nd Annual Spine Trauma Summit May 20-21, 2016 at the Seattle Science Foundation AGENDA Friday, May 20, 2016 6:00pm 6:30pm 9:00pm Buffet Dinner Served (not accredited) Case Reviews and Discussions All
More informationThoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations: Assessment and Classification
Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures and Dislocations: Assessment and Classification Mark L Prasarn MD University of Texas Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery Houston, Texas Updated 7/2016 Anatomy of the Spine
More informationSaudi Journal of Medicine (SJM)
Saudi Journal of Medicine (SJM) Scholars Middle East Publishers Dubai, United Arab Emirates Website: http://scholarsmepub.com/ ISSN 2518-3389 (Print) ISSN 2518-3397 (Online) A Comparative Study of Thoracolumbar
More informationMedical Policy. MP Dynamic Spinal Visualization and Vertebral Motion Analysis
Medical Policy BCBSA Ref. Policy: 6.01.46 Last Review: 09/19/2018 Effective Date: 12/15/2018 Section: Radiology Related Policies 6.01.48 Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 9.01.502 Experimental / Investigational
More informationOdontoid process fracture in 2 year old child: a rare case report
Romanian Neurosurgery Volume XXXI Number 4 2017 October-December Article Odontoid process fracture in 2 year old child: a rare case report Prajapati Hanuman Prasad, Singh Deepak Kumar, Singh Rakesh Kumar,
More informationThoracic Fracture-Dislocations Without Spinal Cord Injury - Two Cases Reports -
Thoracic Fracture-Dislocations Without Spinal Cord Injury - Two Cases Reports - Dong Eun Shin, MD, Seung Yong Rhee, MD, Hak Sun Kim, MD # Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, College
More informationwww.chirurgieorthopedique.com www.chirurgieorthopedique.com www.chirurgieorthopedique.com Vertebral body cage use in thoracolumbar fractures: Outcomes in a prospective series of 23 cases at 2 years follow-up
More informationNo greater tragedy can befall on a young adult in this most
SUPPLEMENT TO JAPI may 2012 VOL. 60 19 Operative Management of Spinal Injuries Sajan Hegde * Introduction No greater tragedy can befall on a young adult in this most active period of life than a spinal
More informationTiming of Decompression in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Neurosurgery Faculty Papers Department of Neurosurgery 9-1-2017 Timing of Decompression in Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A
More informationCommon fracture & dislocation of the cervical spine. Theerachai Apivatthakakul Department of Orthopaedic Chiangmai University
Common fracture & dislocation of the cervical spine Theerachai Apivatthakakul Department of Orthopaedic Chiangmai University Objective Anatomy Mechanism and type of injury PE.and radiographic evaluation
More informationDelayed surgical treatment for a traumatic bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation using a posterior-anterior approach: a case report
Shimada et al. Journal of Medical Case Reports 2013, 7:9 JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS CASE REPORT Open Access Delayed surgical treatment for a traumatic bilateral cervical facet joint dislocation using
More informationThoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its Safety
80 Review Article GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL THIEME Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Injury Severity Score System: A Literature Review of Its Safety Andrei Fernandes Joaquim 1 Dhiego Chaves de Almeida
More informationMISS in Thoracolumbar Fractures
MISS in Thoracolumbar Fractures Guillem Saló Bru, MD, Phd Spine Unit. Orthopaedic Department. Hospital del Mar. Barcelona. Associated Professor. Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona. Introduction. The application
More informationAnterior Corpectomy with Expandable Titanium Cages for Thoraco Lumbar Fractures Audrey Paulzak, MD Pat O'Brien, BS W. George Rusyniak, MD Anthony
Anterior Corpectomy with Expandable Titanium Cages for Thoraco Lumbar Fractures Audrey Paulzak, MD Pat O'Brien, BS W. George Rusyniak, MD Anthony Martino, MD University of South Alabama, Department of
More informationAdvantages of MISS. Disclosures. Thoracolumbar Trauma: Minimally Invasive Techniques. Minimal Invasive Spine Surgery 11/8/2013.
3 rd Annual UCSF Techniques in Complex Spine Surgery Program Thoracolumbar Trauma: Minimally Invasive Techniques Research Support: Stryker Disclosures Murat Pekmezci, MD Assistant Clinical Professor UCSF/SFGH
More informationSurgical Decision Making for Unstable Thoracolumbar Spine Injuries: Results of a Consensus Panel Review by the Spine Trauma Study Group
Thomas Jefferson University Jefferson Digital Commons Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty Papers Department of Orthopaedic Surgery February 2006 Surgical Decision Making for Unstable Thoracolumbar
More informationOriginal Article Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases Jul - Sep ;(2):37-42
Original Article Journal of Bone and Joint Diseases Jul - Sep 2017 32;(2):37-42 Short Segment Posterior Pedicle Instrumentation for Traumatic Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures: Is Bone Grafting Really Needed?
More informationSubaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Dr Hesarikia BUMS
Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma Dr. Hesarikia BUMS Subaxial Cervical Spine From C3-C7 ROM Majority of cervical flexion Lateral bending Approximately 50% rotation Ligamentous Anatomy Anterior ALL, PLL, intervertebral
More informationEfficiency of Ligamentotaxis Using PLL for Thoracic and Lumbar Burst Fractures in the Load-sharing Classification
Efficiency of Ligamentotaxis Using PLL for Thoracic and Lumbar Burst Fractures in the Load-sharing Classification Won-Ju Jeong, MD; Joon-Woo Kim, MD; Dong-Kyo Seo, MD; Hyun-Joo Lee, MD; Jun-Young Kim,
More informationSHORT SEGMENT FIXATION THORACOLUMBAR UNSTABLE BURST FRACTURES USING DC PLATES & PEDICLE SCREWS
STUDY SHORT SEGMENT FIXATION THORACOLUMBAR UNSTABLE BURST FRACTURES USING DC PLATES & PEDICLE SCREWS *Hashem, N.; **A Subai, N. *Faculty of Medicine, Ains Shams University, Egypt ^Department of Orthopedics,
More informationShort term radiological outcome of inserting screw at fracture level in posterior short segment fixation in thoracolumbar burst fractures
Journal of Kathmandu Medical College, Vol. 4, No. 3, Issue 13, Jul.-Sep., 2015 Original Article Short term radiological outcome of inserting screw at fracture level in posterior short segment fixation
More informationMd Quamar Azam, Mir Sadat-Ali
Asian Spine Journal 984 Md Quamar Review Azam Article et al. http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.6.984 The Concept of Evolution of Thoracolumbar Fracture Classifications Helps in Surgical Decisions Md
More informationDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita Kumiai General Hospital, Akita, Japan 2
Asian Spine Journal Vol. 6, No. 2, pp 123~130, 2012 Surgery for lumbar burst fracture / 123 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.123 Anterior Decompression and Shortening Reconstruction with a Titanium
More informationCLINICAL SCIENCE. Yueju Liu, I,II,# Guangbin Li, III,# Tianhua Dong, I,II Yingze Zhang, I,II Heng Li I,II * & INTRODUCTION
CLINICAL SCIENCE One-stage partial vertebrectomy, titanium mesh implantation and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures through a posterior approach Yueju Liu, I,II,#
More informationThoracolumbar Anterior Compression (TAC) System. Allows distraction, compression, and lateral fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine.
Thoracolumbar Anterior Compression (TAC) System. Allows distraction, compression, and lateral fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Technique Guide Instruments and implants approved by the AO
More informationOutline. Epidemiology Indications for C-spine imaging Modalities Interpretation Types of fractures
C-Spine Plain Films Outline Epidemiology Indications for C-spine imaging Modalities Interpretation Types of fractures Epidemiology 7000-10000 c-spine injuries treated each year Additional 5000 die at the
More informationSurgical Management of Dorso- Lumbar Spinal Injuries with Posterior Instrumentation
Original Article Surgical Management of Dorso- Lumbar Spinal Injuries with Posterior Instrumentation JhatothVenkateshwarlu 1, Venkateshwar Rao T 2, RamKumar Reddy K 3, Hanmandlu B 4 1, 3 Associate Professor
More informationPartial vertebrectomy with vertebral shortening for. Key words: thoraco-lumbar fracturedislocation,
Romanian Neurosurgery (2014) XXI 2: 183-187 183 Partial vertebrectomy with vertebral shortening for thoraco-lumbar fracture-dislocation. Case report and technical note Bogdan Costachescu 1,2, Cezar E.
More informationSpinal injury is very common in Ireland: 19 per 100,000 (1). It poses a significant disease burden.
MRI in traumatic spinal cord injury: a single national spinal centre experience and study of imaging features with clinical correlation with ASIA score and outcome Poster No.: C-1235 Congress: ECR 2011
More information2nd International Workshop on Clinical Spine and Orthopedics Biomechanics 13th to 15th April, 2018 Auditorium, ISIC Program 13 th April, 2018: Clinical Orthopaedic biomechanics Time Topic 0900-1015 Session
More informationThoracolumbar Spine Fractures
Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures C. Craig Blackmore, MD, MPH Professor of Radiology Adjunct Professor of Health Services Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center University of Washington Outline Who
More informationCervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a
WScJ 4: 1-5, 2013 Functional Evaluation Using the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association Score (mjoa) for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy by Age, Gender, and Type of Disease Parisa Azimi 1*, Sohrab Shahzadi
More informationTreatment Options for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures
& Treatment Options for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Eldin E. Karaiković¹*, Hector O. Pacheco² 1. Assistant Professor, Northwestern University, and Director of the Spine Center and Lead Physician, Orthopaedic
More informationKanji Mori, Kazuya Nishizawa, Akira Nakamura, and Shinji Imai. 1. Introduction. 2. Case Presentation
Case Reports in Orthopedics Volume 2015, Article ID 301858, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/301858 Case Report Atraumatic Occult Odontoid Fracture in Patients with Osteoporosis-Associated Thoracic
More informationTherapeutic Strategy for Traumatic Instability of Subaxial Cervical Spine
Chinese Medicine, 2009, 1, 23-29 Published Online September 2009 in SciRes (www.scirp.org/journal/cm) Therapeutic Strategy for Traumatic Instability of Subaxial Cervical Spine - ABSTRACT A simple, safe
More informationDynamic Spinal Visualization and Vertebral Motion Analysis
Dynamic Spinal Visualization and Vertebral Motion Analysis Policy Number: 6.01.46 Last Review: 2/2019 Origination: 2/2006 Next Review: 2/2020 Policy Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City (Blue KC)
More informationDepartement of Neurosurgery A.O.R.N A. Cardarelli- Naples.
Percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic, lumbar and thoraco-lumbar junction (T12-L1) traumatic and pathological spine fractures. Report of 45 cases. G. Vitale, A. Punzo,
More informationRevised Dec Spine MR Protocols
Spine MR Protocols Sp 1: Cervical spine MRI without contrast Sp 2: Pre- and post-contrast cervical spine MRI Sp 3: Pre- and post-contrast cervical spine MRI (multiple sclerosis protocol) Sp 4: Thoracic
More informationIstinye University, School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Bahcelievler Medicalpark Hospital, Istanbul,Turkey 2
DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.25025-18.3 eceived: 07.11.2018 / Accepted: 17.12.2018 Published Online: 20.03.2019 Turk Neurosurg, 2019 qr code Original Investigation Comparison of Two Segment Combined Instrumentation
More informationUpper Cervical Spine - Occult Injury and Trigger for CT Exam
Upper Cervical Spine - Occult Injury and Trigger for CT Exam Main Menu Introduction Clinical clearance of C-SpineC Radiographic evaluation Norms for C-spineC Triggers for CT exam: Odontoid Lateral view
More informationSpine MRI in Trauma Patients
Spine MRI in Trauma Patients 4th Musculoskeletal MRI meeting 2017: Spine MRI 6th May, 2017 Gustav Andreisek, MD, MBA Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Civico, Aula Magna Professor of Radiology, University
More informationA morphometric study of the Pedicles of dry human typical lumbar vertebrae
Original article: A morphometric of the Pedicles of dry human typical lumbar vertebrae Dhaval K. Patil 1 *, Pritha S. Bhuiyan 2 1Resident, Department of Anatomy, Seth G S Medical College, Parel, Mumbai-400012,
More informationFlexion Distraction Injuries in the Thoracolumbar Spine: An In Vitro Study of the Relation Between Flexion Angle and the Motion Axis of Fracture
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 139 143 2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia Flexion Distraction Injuries in the Thoracolumbar Spine: An In Vitro Study of
More informationKumaFix fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study on selective consecutive patients
Xi an Hong Hui Hospital Xi an, Shaanxi, China KumaFix fixation for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study on selective consecutive patients Dingjun Hao, Baorong He, Liang Yan Hong Hui Hospital,
More informationU.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS
U.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS idata_usmis15_rpt Published in December 2014 By idata Research Inc., 2014 idata Research Inc. Suite 308 4211 Kingsway Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada,
More informationMedical Policy. MP Dynamic Spinal Visualization
Medical Policy MP 6.01.46 BCBSA Ref. Policy: 6.01.46 Last Review: 03/29/2018 Effective Date: 03/29/2018 Section: Radiology End Date: 12/14/2018 Related Policies 6.01.48 Positional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
More informationA CASE OF MISMANAGED CERVICAL FRACTURE IN A PATIENT OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS
A CASE OF MISMANAGED CERVICAL FRACTURE IN A PATIENT OF ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS INTRODUCTION Spine fractures occur with minor trauma in patients with ankylosing Spondylitis. They are highly unstable with
More informationCover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/29800 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Moojen, Wouter Anton Title: Introducing new implants and imaging techniques for
More informationImaging of Cervical Spine Trauma Tudor H Hughes, M.D.
Imaging of Cervical Spine Trauma Tudor H Hughes, M.D. General Considerations Most spinal fractures are due to a single episode of major trauma. Fatigue fractures of the spine are unusual except in the
More informationTreatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by vertebral shortening
Eur Spine J (2002) 11 :8 12 DOI 10.1007/s005860000214 TECHNICAL INNOVATION Alejandro Reyes-Sanchez Luis M. Rosales Victor P. Miramontes Dario E. Garin Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by vertebral
More informationNeurologic Deficit: A Case Report
Case Report imedpub Journals http://www.imedpub.com Spine Research DOI: 10.21767/2471-8173.100006 Unusual 2-Stages Posterior Approach Surgical Treatment for Complete Fracture Dislocation of the Upper Thoracic
More informationPediatric cervical spine injuries with neurological deficits, treatment options, and potential for recovery
SICOT J 2017, 3, 53 Ó The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017 DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017035 Available online at: www.sicot-j.org CASE REPORT OPEN ACCESS Pediatric cervical spine injuries with neurological
More information