Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010
|
|
|
- Arthur Richard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010
2 OUTLINE - AE (adverse event) - SAE (serious adverse event) - UP (unanticipated problem) - Unexpected - Related - Harmful - How does an AE become a UP? - Resources Research Compliance Office 2
3 Definitions AE any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human subject, temporally associated with a research study, whether or not it is related to the study Can encompass both psychological and physical harms Are not promptly reported to the IRB OHRP Guidance on Reviewing and Reporting UPs Involving Risks to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events Research Compliance Office 3
4 Definition SAE Serious Adverse Event SAE is an AE (untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a subject) that: 1) Results in death 2) Is life-threatening 3) Results in hospitalization (or prolongation of existing stay) 4) Results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity 5) Results in a congenital abnormality/defect 6) May jeopardize subject health, and requires surgery/medical intervention to prevent other 5 criteria Research Compliance Office 4
5 OHRP Consideration OHRP considers some SAEs and AEs important events because they may: SAEs/AEs are submitted during the continuing review process but modifications to the protocol or the ICF can be submitted at any time Research Compliance Office 5
6 OHRP Consideration OHRP considers some SAEs and AEs important events because they may: suggest that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm than what was previously known warrant changes in the protocol, ICF procedures/documents Research Compliance Office 6
7 OHRP Definition UPs Any incident, experience, or outcome that meets ALL of the following criteria: 1) unexpected (in terms of nature, severity, specificity or frequency) 2) related or possibly related to participation in a study 3) places subject or others at a greater risk of harm* than was previously recognized * including physical, social, economic or psychological harm Research Compliance Office 7
8 General Relationship Between AEs/UPs SAEs A = Adverse Events that are not Unanticipated Problems B= AE s that are UPs C= Unanticipated Problems that are NOT Adverse Events Under 45 CFR 46: Do not report A; Report B and C
9 UPs 45 CFR (a) and 45 CFR (b)(5) Unanticipated problems involving risks to subjects or to others Are promptly reported to the IRB within 5 days of the PD discovery if death/lifethreatening situation occurs within 10 for all other UPs Initially determined to be UPs by monitoring entity, sponsor or PD IRB makes the final UP determination Research Compliance Office 9
10 Unexpected Example: Informed consent (or IB) states that you will get a slight rash at the injection site. Leland comes down with a rash from head to toe. Unexpected? Yes; severity was not expected Research Compliance Office 10
11 Related Leland comes down with a rash before administration of a medication. Related? No; he did not receive the drug before the rash Related : there is a reasonable possibility that the adverse event may have been caused by the procedures involved in the research (FDA: associated with the drug ) Research Compliance Office 11
12 Harmful The informed consent states that you may receive a minor rash within a few hours after administration of a drug. The rash was so severe, Leland was hospitalized and was unable to go to work. Harmful? Yes; it placed Leland at physical and economic risk (in terms of lost wages) Research Compliance Office 12
13 How does an AE become a UP? Leland has a bad reaction to a drug that was anticipated to last a few days, that now has lasted a few weeks. The rash worsens over time and is now diagnosed as Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Harmful Related Unexpected 13 Research Compliance Office
14 GUI-P13 45 CFR (b)(5) Resources Guidance On Reviewing and Reporting Unanticipated Problems FDA Guidance: dances/ucm pdf
Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010
Guidance on Unanticipated Problems (UPs) and Adverse Events (AEs) Bertha delanda IRB Training Specialist Research Compliance Office March 2010 OUTLINE - AE (adverse event) - SAE (serious adverse event)
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014
ST. MICHAEL S HOSPITAL Guidelines for Reporting Serious Adverse Events / Unanticipated Problems to the SMH Research Ethics Board (REB) July 09, 2014 1. Introduction The St. Michael s Hospital (SMH) REB
Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events
Unanticipated Problems and Adverse Events David Borasky, MPH, CIP Office of Research Protections RTI International Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA Introduction IEC review of unanticipated problems
Understanding Adverse Events
The Fundamentals of International Clinical Research Workshop Understanding Adverse Events Deborah Hilgenberg Family Health International Goals of the Presentation Definition of Adverse Event (AE) Definitions
Adverse Events- Love them, hate them, report them!
Adverse Events- Love them, hate them, report them! Billi Tatum, RN, CCRC Regional Vascular Center Harborview Medical Center and the University of Washington Medical Center Objectives Define and identify
PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION. Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012
PHONE SCRIPTS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND WAIVERS OF DOCUMENTATION Bertha delanda, CIP IRB Training Specialist January 2012 Today s objective: To review phone screening scripts and questionnaire requirements,
Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS Version 2.0 January 2010
Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS Version 2.0 January 2010 January 2010 Version 2.0 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION...1 1.1 Scope... 1 1.2 Purpose... 1 1.3 Responsibilities...
Adverse Experience Reporting
Managing and reporting adverse events Key learning objectives By the end of this session, you will be able to: Define and classify an adverse event; Differentiate between serious and severe adverse events;
NCI CIRB Independent Model studies is described herein.
Review for Studies Approved by the Independent Model National Cancer Institute (NCI) Pediatric Central Institutional (Formerly entitled Facilitated IRB Review for Studies Approved by the National Cancer
SAE håndtering i protokol CC MM-001
SAE håndtering i protokol CC-92480-MM-001 An SAE is any AE occurring at any dose that: Results in death; Is life-threatening (ie, in the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is at immediate risk of
WELCOME TO ONLINE TRAINING FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH COORDINATORS
UCLA CTSI WELCOME TO ONLINE TRAINING FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH COORDINATORS ROLE OF THE RESEARCH COORDINATOR Adverse Events in Clinical Trials: Definitions and Documentation May 2016 Objectives Recognize the
Safety Assessment in Clinical Trials and Beyond
Safety Assessment in Clinical Trials and Beyond Yuliya Yasinskaya, MD Medical Team Leader Division of Anti-Infective Products Center for Drug Evaluation and Research FDA Clinical Investigator Training
Developing a Detection and Reporting System for Adverse Events. Deborah Hilgenberg Family Health International
Developing a Detection and Reporting System for Adverse Events Deborah Hilgenberg Family Health International Elements of Reporting Detection System Written definition of adverse events Checklist of expected
GENERAL INFORMATION. Adverse Event (AE) Definition (ICH GUIDELINES E6 FOR GCP 1.2):
Make copies of the blank SAE report form as needed. Retain originals with confirmation of all information faxed to DMID Pharmacovigilance Group Clinical Research Operations and Management Support (CROMS
DEMOGRAPHICS PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES VITAL SIGNS. Protocol: ABC-123 SCREENING. Subject ID. Subject Initials. Visit Date: / / [ YYYY/MM/DD]
![DEMOGRAPHICS PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES VITAL SIGNS. Protocol: ABC-123 SCREENING. Subject ID. Subject Initials. Visit Date: / / [ YYYY/MM/DD]](/thumbs/78/78699510.jpg "DEMOGRAPHICS PHYSICAL ATTRIBUTES VITAL SIGNS. Protocol: ABC-123 SCREENING. Subject ID. Subject Initials. Visit Date: / / [ YYYY/MM/DD]")
SCREENING Visit Date: DEMOGRAPHICS / / [YYYY/MM/DD] Consent Signed Date and time / / [YYYY/MM/DD] : Has written assent been obtained? If no, why not? YES NO Gender: Male Female Birthdate: Permission given
Safety Manual: DAD Trial
Safety Manual: DAD Trial Cognitive behavioural therapy vs. sertraline in patients with depression and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial Short title: Diabetes and Depression
Guidance on Returning Research Results to Subjects
Guidance on Returning Research Results to Subjects 1. SCOPE 1.1. System Wide 2. DEFINITIONS & EXPLANATIONS OF TERMS 2.1. Anticipated finding: The planned outcome of the experiment or research activity.
OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research
NOTE: THIS GUIDANCE REPLACES THE FOLLOWING OHRP GUIDANCE: "OHRP Guidance on Approving Research Involving Prisoners" (May 19, 2000) found on the OHRP website at: http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/guidance/prison.htm
This SOP applies to all IRB administrative staff, members and investigators. IRB members, administrative staff and investigators.
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD INFORMED CONSENT OF NON-ENGLISH SPEAKING SUBJECTS, ILLITERATE ENGLISH-SPEAKING SUBJECTS, AND VISUALLY- IMPAIRED OR HEARING-IMPAIRED
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Form Clinical Trials
Protocol Code number: LP0162-1334 1. Trial information: Subject ID: Site No.: Country: Is this the initial report of an SAE or a follow-up? Initial Follow-up, follow up no. In which period of the trial
Serious Adverse Event
Adverse Event Non- Adverse Event Expected Unexpected Unexpected Non- Serious Serious Serious Harm or Increased Risk of Harm Unrelated Possibly Related or Related Possibly Related or Related Unrelated Possibly
RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS
RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS Office of Research 1. Overview Federal regulations require additional protections for prisoners involved in research. These requirements include, among other things, that research
Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:
Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research: Working with the IRB Lloyd Byrd, MS Chair, VCU IRB Panel E Member, VCU IRB Panel B Monika S. Markowitz, Ph.D. Director, Office of Research
8.0 ADVERSE EVENT HANDLING
8.0 ADVERSE EVENT HANDLING In accordance with the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations governing IND safety reports (Code of Federal Regulations 21, 312.32), adverse events (AEs) are reported from research
PHARMACOVIGILANCE GLOSSARY
PHARMACOVIGILANCE GLOSSARY Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 Definitions of terminology used for side effects Definitions of drug safety terms Definitions of risk terminology Definitions of general
Chapter 8: Safety, Adverse Events and Endpoints
Table of Contents Chapter 8: Safety, Adverse Events and Endpoints... 8-1 8.1 The ACLAIMS Safety Officer... 8-1 8.2 Adverse Events (AE)... 8-1 8.3 Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)... 8-2 8.4 Classifying Adverse
Adverse Event Reporting. Good Clinical Practice
Adverse Event Reporting Good Clinical Practice Definitions and IMP Information The Elfin Dossier describes the physical and chemical, toxicological pharmacological data on an IMP No overt toxicity is expected
Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Form Clinical Trials
Protocol Code number: LP0162-1325 1. Trial information: Subject ID: Site No.: Country: If blinded trial, was the study treatment unblinded? Yes No Is this the initial report of an SAE or a follow-up? Initial
NOTICE OF INITIATION OF DISQUALIFICATION PROCEEDINGS AND OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration 1401 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-1448 September 26, 2011 By Overnight Delivery Michael Dean Berger, M.D.
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES GLOSSARY: Administrative Hold (initiated by the investigator): A voluntary action by the investigator to put research
For a copy of slides please
Aaron M Tejani Vijaya Musini Ken Bassett Patricia Fortin Therapeutics Initiative, UBC Fraser Health Pharmacy Services, BC For a copy of slides please email: aaron.tejani@fraserhealth.ca Income sources
WARNING LETTER. Ref: 09-HFD
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Servic e Food and Drug Administration Rockville, MD 2085 7 WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Francisco He rn andez, M.D. 777 E.
Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB
December 15, 2016 Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB About Schulman IRB Established in 1983 Superior audit history with FDA five consecutive
1. What is your role in the AAHRPP accreditation process?
Investigator Responsibilities AAHRPP accreditation is a gold standard recognizing adherence to a rigorous set of human subjects protection standards that go beyond federal and state requirements. It communicates
IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?
IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)? All Regis University faculty, students (graduate and undergraduate), and staff
If the HPTN 082 protocol is amended in the future, this Letter of Amendment will be incorporated into the next version.
Letter of Amendment #3 to: HPTN 082: Uptake and adherence to daily oral PrEP as a primary prevention strategy for young African women: A Vanguard Study Version 1.0, 8 December 2015 DAIDS Document ID: 12068
Subject experienced tachycardia and atrial fibrillation while engaged in a study in the Human Studies Facility
IRB Number: 04-1677 Legacy ID: GCRC-2067 PI: Robert Devlin IRB: Biomedical Sponsor: Study Title: US EPA Physiological Changes in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome Exposed to Concentrated Ultrafine Chapel
OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens
OHRP - Guidance on Research Involving Coded Private Information or Biological Specimens NOTE: THIS GUIDANCE REPLACES OHRP S AUGUST 10, 2004 GUIDANCE ENTITLED GUIDANCE ON RESEARCH INVOLVING CODED PRIVATE
AFDO Conference June 9, Mercedes Mota, Director Medical Device, Surgical Care Johnson & Johnson Quality & Compliance Worldwide
AFDO Conference June 9, 2009 Mercedes Mota, Director Medical Device, Surgical Care Johnson & Johnson Quality & Compliance Worldwide Government Agencies 483 observations A violation of the FD&C Act involving
Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26
Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26 Title of Policy: Special Categories of Research: Prisoners as Research Subjects. Responsible Executive: Gary K. Ostrander Approving Official: Gary K. Ostrander
Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB
Page: 1 of 5 I. PURPOSE II. III. IV. To provide guidance on the types of research activities that are subject to review and approval by the Committees for the Protection of Human, which comprise the Institutional
1. Comply with the NCI CIRB s requirements and directives;
Michigan State University Human Research Protection Program Subject: Use of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board Section: 1-5 This policy and procedure supersedes those previously
Reporting to the IRB Part 2
Webinar Series Reporting to the IRB Part 2 Frequently Asked Questions December 4, 2013 Presented by: James MacFarlane Director of Board Services About Schulman Associates IRB Established in 1983 US and
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING. Catherine Dillon, CCRP
ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING Catherine Dillon, CCRP Reporting Adverse Events Adverse Events (AEs) are... any untoward medical occurrence in a subject that was not previously identified which does not necessarily
Conducting Research Involving Medical Imaging
Conducting Research Involving Medical Imaging J. Keith Smith, MD, PhD Terry Hartman, MPH, MS, CCRC Angela Creighton, MBA April 19, 2018 Objectives Summarize the risks of medical imaging involving ionizing
NIH StrokeNet Network Standard Operating Procedure
1. PURPOSE The purpose of this SOP is to outline procedures for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and oversight of National Institutes of Health (NIH) StrokeNet affiliated protocols conducted by
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE
1 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE Developed by: Dr. Eduardo Jesús Arismendi-Pardi Department of Mathematics Sheri Sterner Office
FDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions
FDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions 23 January 2017 On December 27, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug
EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists
EXEMPT RESEARCH Introduction Many educational, behavioral, and social science studies present little or no risk to the participants. Likewise, research involving existing data, medical records, and pathologic
Stopping rules for FIM trials
Stopping rules for FIM trials AGAH Workshop, 26 September 2013 Dr. Karin Göhler, Grünenthal GmbH Page 1 Relevant Guidelines EMEA/ CHMP/ SWP/ 294648/ 2007 Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate
Research & Development. J H Pacynko and J Illingworth. Research, pharmacy and R&D staff
Department Title of SOP Research & Development Safety reporting SOP SOP reference no: R&D GCP SOP 07 Authors: Current version number and date: J H Pacynko and J Illingworth Version 9, 31.01.18 Next review
Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices
Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices An unapproved medical device may normally only be used on human subjects through an approved clinical study in which the subjects meet certain criteria
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT I. BACKGROUND Electronic consenting ( e-consenting ) is the use of electronic systems and processes, whether in person
Access to Experimental Therapies / FDA Expanded Access Programs
Access to Experimental Therapies / FDA Expanded Access Programs Outline Overview of expanded access CDER/OHOP experience and data regarding expanded access Drug development considerations for expanded
Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Home > Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations > Enforcement Actions > Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Punjwani, Sohail S., M.D.
IND Exemption: Case Scenarios. Scenario No. 1
IND Exemption: Case Scenarios Scenario No. 1 Investigator plans to study anti-flu drug to treat flu symptoms in children under the age of 10 Drug INFLUN is currently approved in the pediatric setting,
IRB Approval From: 3/8/2010 To: 10/28/2010
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM Phase II Study to Assess the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Swine-Origin H1N1 Influenza Vaccine in HIV-1 (Version 3.0, 16 FEB 2010) IRB Approval From:
Safety Monitoring: The Patient Perspective. Kevin Weinfurt, PhD Kathryn Flynn, PhD
Safety Monitoring: The Patient Perspective Kevin Weinfurt, PhD Kathryn Flynn, PhD Acknowledgments Carrie Dombeck, MA Chantelle Hardy Cheri Janning, BSN, RN, MS Judy Kramer, MD, MS Gracia Wright Strategy
The Complaint Department: How IRBs Handle Complaints, Questions and Concerns from Study Participants
Webinar Series The Complaint Department: How IRBs Handle Complaints, Questions and Concerns from Study Participants July 29, 2015 Presented by: James MacFarlane, HRPP Director, University of New Mexico
QA Program Evaluation Research Tool CF-195, Effective
COMPARISON OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH, QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, AND PROGRAM EVALUATION ACTIVITIES RESEARCH QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EVALUATION COMMENTS INTENT Intent of project is to develop or
IRB Review Points to Consider September 2016
POINTS TO CONSIDER Principal investigators 1. Does the principal investigator have the appropriate qualifications, experience, and facilities to ensure that all aspects of the project and follow-up will
Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Home > Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations > Enforcement Actions > Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Ratzan, Judith M.D. 2/16/11
Revised August 28, 2018
Florida State University Human Subjects Committee Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) 7-IRB-26 Title: Responsible Executive: Approving Official: Prisoners as Research Subjects Gary K. Ostrander Gary K.
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program
Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program Research Involving Human Subjects August 2013 Regulations Four sources: 32 CFR 219 (Common Rule) DoDI 3216.02 SECNAVINST 3900.39D 21 CFR 50 and
SAFETY OF MEDICINES: CLINICAL C TRIALS AND PHARMACOVIGILANCE. Robert Lindblad, M.D. Chief Medical Officer The EMMES Corporation
SAFETY OF MEDICINES: CLINICAL C TRIALS AND PHARMACOVIGILANCE Robert Lindblad, M.D. Chief Medical Officer The EMMES Corporation The Quality of Safety Data Sf Safety vs. efficacy Adverse event reporting
Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process
Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process Ethics in Patient-Oriented Research October 13, 2010 Sharon Friend Director, OHRPP Overview Charge and Function of the IRB Conducting Risk and Benefit Assessments
SAFETY AND EFFICACY ASSESSMENTS
SAFETY AND EFFICACY ASSESSMENTS The observations and procedures described in (Primary Arthritis Assessments) and the Hip or Knee Pain on motion assessment described in (Secondary Arthritis Assessment)
Enrolling Non-English Speaking Participants in Clinical Research: Regulatory and Practical Considerations Michele Russell-Einhorn, JD
June 29, 2017 Enrolling Non-English Speaking Participants in Clinical Research: Regulatory and Practical Considerations Michele Russell-Einhorn, JD VP of HRP Services, Institutional Official, Schulman
SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners
MANUAL: Administrative Policy & Procedure Manual SJMHS Locations: St. Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, St. Joseph Mercy Chelsea, St. Joseph Mercy Livingston, St. Mary Mercy Livonia POLICY: Persons meeting the federal
MedDRA Coding and Versioning
MedDRA Coding and Versioning 4th ANNUAL INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL DATA MANAGEMENT Alexandria, VA. 27-28 October 2016 Anna Zhao-Wong, MD, PhD Deputy Director of MedDRA MSSO anna.zhao-wong@meddra.org Agenda
IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College
IRB policy and procedures 1 Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College IRB policy and procedures 2 Table of Contents A. Purpose and objectives... p. 3 B. Membership of the
Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017
Investigator s Handbook for the Protection of Human Participants in Research Institutional Review Board Revised February 23, 2017 Dear Antioch University Principal Investigator: This handbook is intended
IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews
IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews This reviewer worksheet is copied with modifications from Khan and Kornetsky s Overview of Initial Protocol Review printed in IRB Management and Function (2006).
AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS
Institutional Review Board Sponsored Programs Office, Buckham Hall 206 1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, NY 14222 Federalwide Assurance ID#: 00007126 AN INVESTIGATOR S GUIDE TO RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS
FormsNet Adverse Event Form
FormsNet Adverse Event Form Registry Use Only Sequence Number: Date Received: Recipient Identification 1. CIBMTR Recipient ID (CRID): 2. NMDP Recipient ID (RID): (if applicable) - - 3. CIBMTR Center Number
Goal of site data management 12/2/2009. Ultimate goal: reliable and valid clinical trial to improve health
RC-4 Overview of Clinical Site Operations and Management Unit 4: Overview of Data Quality and Monitoring Principal Investigators Lynda Wilson, PhD, RN Marti Rice, PhD, RN Program Manager TBA Course Instructors:
LONG-TERM INVESTIGATIVE FOLLOW-UP IN TRIALNET (LIFT) (Protocol TN-16)
TrialNet Protocol TN16 LIFT Protocol Version: 2.0 12FEB2015 LONG-TERM INVESTIGATIVE FOLLOW-UP IN TRIALNET (LIFT) (Protocol TN-16) Version: 2.0 12FEB2015 Sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes
ASSIGNED TREATMENT ARM
SF Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase III Lung High-dose vs Standard-dose Conformal XRT with Chemotherapy Consolidation Treatment Summary Form RTOG Study No. 0617 Case # AMENDED DATA YES INSTRUCTIONS:
Good Clinical Practices
s A Simple Guide James D. Campbell, MD, MS University of Maryland School of Medicine Overview of Rounds What are Good Clinical Practices? In human subject research, GCPs are the ethical and scientific
IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER)
IDENTIFYING, ASSESSING, AND RESOLVING ISSUES IN SOCIAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (SBER) Cynthia Monahan, MBA, CIP IRB Director Boston University Charles River Campus Objectives Overview of
Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review
Human Subjects Application for Full IRB and Expedited Exempt Review 1. Project Title and Identification As Principal Investigator of this study, I assure the IRB that the following statements are true:
International Research and the IRB: What you need to know before you go
International Research and the IRB: What you need to know before you go Jake Stoddard, BA, CIP Ohio State s research community is perhaps the most comprehensive in the nation, and its breadth and excellence
IRB review of device studies
Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker 2011 Device Advice from the FDA 2011 Conferences 2011 IRB review of device studies Jonathan M. Green Washington University School of Medicine
Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review
Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethics, Process, and Guidance for Streamlining IRB Review Graduate Medical Education October 9, 2013 Cortni Romaine Education and Outreach Coordinator Office of Human
ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 01/19/2016. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT
ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) Receipt Release Date: 01/19/2016 ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00595413 Study Identification Unique Protocol ID: 27905 Brief Title: Atacicept
Lecture 2. Key Concepts in Clinical Research
Lecture 2 Key Concepts in Clinical Research Outline Key Statistical Concepts Bias and Variability Type I Error and Power Confounding and Interaction Statistical Difference vs Clinical Difference One-sided
Adverse Events Following Immunisation. Castlebar, Nov. 8, 2013 Kevin Connolly
Adverse Events Following Immunisation Castlebar, Nov. 8, 2013 Kevin Connolly Outline of presentation Definitions Safety assessment Timing of reactions Causality-real and coincidence Errors Occasional diversions
Serious Adverse Event Report Form (CTIMP)
SAE Identifier: Serious Adverse Event Report Form (CTIMP) Form completion instructions overleaf 1. Report type (tick one) Initial report Follow-up information 2. Site name: 3. Participant details Study
Determining risk for research involving children. Angela Bain, IRB Specialist
Determining risk for research involving children Angela Bain, IRB Specialist abain@uga.edu 706-542-3821 Standards for determining risk The Procedure Based Standard Categorizes as minimal risk only those
NIDA Rationale Clean 1 09/17/06
Rationale for Modifications to the 2001 National Institute on Drug Abuse Policy on Counseling and Testing for HIV/AIDS and other Infectious Diseases (NOT-DA-01-001). This document identifies and provides
Biomarker classification: a philosophical introduction.
Biomarker classification: a philosophical introduction. Philip Timmerman, on behalf of the EBF biomarker team (TT-14) 16 November 2011, Barcelona, Spain Background A few no-brainers to start the conference
Adverse Events Monitoring (aka Pharmacovigilance)
Adverse Events Monitoring (aka Pharmacovigilance) Presentation to American Conference Institute s FDA Boot Camp William W. Vodra May 16, 2007 Agenda What is pharmacovigilance (PV)? How does PV use adverse
Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure
Page 1 of 10 DESCRIPTION INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS Prisoners may be under constraints because of their incarceration that could affect their ability to make a truly
CMS Issues New Draft Guidance on Coverage with Evidence Development Policy for National Coverage Determinations
December 6, 2012 CMS Issues New Draft Guidance on Coverage with Evidence Development Policy for National Coverage Determinations For more information, contact: Seth H. Lundy +1 202 626 2924 slundy@kslaw.com
COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019
COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019 HISTORY The Common Rule has been in effect since 1991, and was adopted by 15 federal departments and agencies, including the Department of Health
Adverse Event Monitoring and Reporting
Adverse Event Monitoring and Reporting MTN 005 Study-Specific Training SSP Section 11 AE Definition The International Conference on Harmonization Consolidated Guidance for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-E2A)
Practice Patterns and Outcomes of ACTHar use in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome
Page 1 of 16 Practice Patterns and Outcomes of ACTHar use in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome MANUAL OF OPERATIONS VERSION 1.0 March 10, 2016 Page 2 of 16 STUDY PERSONNEL CONTACT INFORMATION Principal
Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations
Home Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Enforcement Actions Warning Letters Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations Dimitri Sirakoff 9/12/13 Department
IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW
IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW Research activities that (1) present no more than minimal risk* to human research participants, and (2) involve only procedures listed in one or more of the following categories may
(Cochineal Extract and Carmine: Declaration by Name on the Label of All Foods and Cosmetic Products That Contain These Color Additives)
ก ก 2553 ก : ก (Cochineal Extract and Carmine: Declaration by Name on the Label of All Foods and Cosmetic Products That Contain These Color Additives) : ก ก ก : ก ก ก : 2552 : 2552 1 ก 5 ก : ก (Cochineal