Mendocino County 2010
|
|
- Pamela Collins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Mendocino County 21
2 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Mendocino County 21
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Key Findings... 3 Summary of Key Indicators of Community Alcohol and Drug Use... 5 Indicator 1: Prevalence of Past Year Binge Drinking Table/Figure 1.1 Estimated Number and Percent of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year with Comparison to State Rates...6 Table/Figure 1.2 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Gender...6 Table 1.3 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Race/Ethnicity...7 Figure 1.3 Past Year Binge Drinking in by Race/Ethnicity...7 Table 1.4 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Age Category...8 Figure 1.4 Past Year Binge Drinking in by Age Category...8 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Treatment Data Clarifications... 9 Table 2.1 Number of Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates...9 Figure 2.1 Treatment Admission Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates...9 Table 2.2 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Gender, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions... 1 Figure 2.2 Treatment Admission Population by Client Gender... 1 Table 2.3 Treatment Admissions by Primary Drug Type, Percent of Total Admissions, and Population Figure 2.3 Treatment Admission Population by Primary Drug Type Table 2.4 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Race/Ethnicity, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions Figure 2.4 Treatment Admission Population by Client Race/Ethnicity Table 2.5 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions Figure 2.5 Treatment Admission Population by Client Age Category Table 2.6 Characteristics of Clients Admitted to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment and Population Figure 2.6 Age of Substance Use Initiation Population Table 2.7 AOD Treatment Admissions by Primary Drug Type, Percent of Total Admissions, and Population to 17 Years Figure 2.7 Underage Treatment Admission Population to 17 by Primary Drug Type Table 2.8 AOD Treatment Admissions among Youth Under Age 18 by Gender and Client Race/Ethnicity, Population to 17, and Percent of Total Admissions Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime Table 3.1 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses and Population 1 to 69 Years with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 3.1 Drug Arrest Population 1 to 69 with Comparison to Statewide Rates Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Table of Contents, California
4 Table 3.2 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Gender, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests Figure 3.2 Drug Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Gender Table 3.3 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Specific Offense, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests Figure 3.3 Drug Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Specific Offense Table 3.4 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Race/Ethnicity, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests Figure 3.4 Drug Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Race/Ethnicity Table 3.5 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Age Category, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests... 2 Figure 3.5 Drug Arrest Population by Offender Age Category... 2 Table 3.6 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Gender and Race/Ethnicity among Underage Offenders, Population 1 to 17 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime Table 4.1 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses and Population 1 to 69 Years with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 4.1 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 4.2 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Gender, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests Figure 4.2 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Gender Table 4.3 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Specific Offense, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests Figure 4.3 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Specific Offense Table 4.4 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Race/Ethnicity, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests Figure 4.4 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Race/Ethnicity Table 4.5 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests Figure 4.5 Alcohol Arrest Population by Offender Age Category Table 4.6 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Gender and Race/Ethnicity among Underage Offenders, Population 1 to 17 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents Table 5.1 Fatalities in Alcohol Involved Accidents and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 5.1 Alcohol Involved Accident Fatality Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 5.2 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Gender, Population, and Percent of Total Figure 5.2 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Gender Table 5.3 Alcohol Involved Accidents by Injury Severity, Total Population, and Percent of Total Figure 5.3 Alcohol Involved Total Population, by Injury Severity Table 5.4 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Race/Ethnicity, Population, and Percent of Total Figure 5.4 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Race/Ethnicity Table 5.5 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total... 3 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Table of Contents, California
5 Figure 5.5 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Age Category... 3 Indicator 6: Hospitalization Due to Alcohol and Drug Use Table 6.1 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 6.1 Alcohol and Drug Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 6.2 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Gender, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions Figure 6.2 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Gender Table 6.3 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol Related Causes and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 6.3 Alcohol Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 6.4 Hospitalizations Due to Drug Related Causes and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 6.4 Drug Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 6.5 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol Related Causes by Specific Cause and Total Population Table 6.6 Hospitalizations Due to Drug Related Causes by Specific Cause and Total Population Table 6.7 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Race/Ethnicity, Rate per 1, Population, and Percent of Hospitalizations Figure 6.5 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Race/Ethnicity Table 6.8 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Age Category, Rate per 1, Population, and Percent of Hospitalizations Figure 6.6 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Age Category Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use Table 7.1 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) and Age Adjusted with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 7.1 Mortality Age Adjusted Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 7.2 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Gender of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths Figure 7.2 AOD Related Mortality Population by Decedent Gender Table 7.3 Deaths Due to Alcohol Related Causes and Total Population, with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 7.3 Alcohol Related Mortality Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 7.4 Deaths Due to Drug Related Causes and Total Population, with Comparison to Statewide Rates Figure 7.4 Drug Related Mortality Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Table 7.5 Deaths Due to Alcohol Related Causes by Specific Cause, and Total Population Table 7.6 Deaths Due to Drug Related Causes by Specific Cause, and Total Population... 4 Table 7.7 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Race/Ethnicity of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths Figure 7.5 AOD Related Mortality Population by Decedent Race/Ethnicity Table 7.8 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Age Category of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths Figure 7.6 AOD Related Mortality Population by Decedent Age Category Sources Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Table of Contents, California
6 INTRODUCTION In the mid 199s, the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, in collaboration with the Center for Applied Research Solutions (CARS), Inc. began to work toward improving the state s prevention information system. A key component of this information system was the continuous collection, monitoring and reporting of selected community level indicators that would serve as direct and indirect measures of alcohol and other drug use prevalence and related problems. This information system was designed to assist with state and local prevention planning and policy making by providing useful, systematic data about prevention and treatment needs and outcomes throughout the state. The present report is the most recent product of this ongoing effort. It differs from earlier versions in a few important ways. First, while previous reports typically summarized data for more than twenty five indicators of health and social conditions that are theoretically linked to problem substance use, the current version is more streamlined, focusing on seven key indicators of AOD use and abuse prevalence and their direct consequences, including impacts on the criminal justice, health and alcohol and drug treatment systems. Second, the 21 report updates information contained in earlier versions, but expands in its depth to summarize data for populations within the larger county, including age, gender, and race/ethnicity subgroups. This expanded detail allows for more precise analyses of alcohol and drug use problems within a county population and enhances the ability to effectively target prevention and intervention strategies to community needs. Similar to previous reports, the 21 version includes simple analytic tools to help users interpret the information presented. This includes use of population based rates (e.g., the number of incidents relative to the total population) to make meaningful comparisons between geographic areas that differ in population size, or comparisons between differing time points. Data is presented at both the county and state level to allow county rates to be evaluated against a relative average. The overall intent of the report is to provide a simple, easy to use resource that helps synthesize the most relevant indicator data currently available to assess substance use problems, in an effort to optimize prevention planning and outcome measurement efforts in communities through the state. Specifically, it is designed to support the work of planners, policy makers, and practitioners in the field in: Determining the incidence of alcohol and other drug use problems within county populations and subpopulations; Monitoring trends in problem incidence to identify emergent issues and detect changes in status over time; Establishing program resource levels that are appropriate to address the nature and extent of prevention and treatment needs; and, Documenting progress toward achieving targeted prevention objectives and outcomes. The report contains information on several key indicators of alcohol and drug prevalence and consequences for California populations in each of the following seven indicators: 1. Household prevalence of past year binge drinking; 2. Admissions to publicly funded and/or monitored alcohol and other drug treatment facilities; 3. Arrests for drug related criminal offenses; 4. Arrests for alcohol related criminal offenses; 5. Motor vehicle accidents involving drivers who had been drinking; 6. Hospitalizations for alcohol and drug related conditions; and, 7. Mortality attributable to acute and chronic alcohol and drug use. Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Introduction, California 1
7 Each report contains data compiled from several sources, including a statewide, longitudinal survey of California household populations, and state data systems housing public archival records from six central agencies, including the California Department of Justice (DOJ), the California Highway Patrol (CHP), the California Department of Public Health, Vital Statistics Section, the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD), the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). This reliance on statewide data sources ensures that the information reported is drawn from reliable and valid measures that are routinely and uniformly collected across jurisdictions (i.e., all counties use the same data collection), allowing for comparisons over time, across counties, and between counties and the state. Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Introduction, California 2
8 KEY FINDINGS Indicator 1: Prevalence of Past Year Binge Drinking Approximately 36 percent of residents age 18 and older participated in binge drinking in 27 compared to the statewide rate of 3 percent. Males participated in binge drinking much more frequently than females (49 percent versus 24 percent) in 27. Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Overall, admission rates to treatment facilities in have increased slightly since 2. In 2 there were about 96 admissions per 1, compared to 1,4 admissions per 1, in 28. s AOD admission rate was much higher than the state overall each year. There may be differences in detoxification and non detoxification service admission trends that affect this overall trend (see Treatment Data Clarifications section on page 9 for detail). Admissions due to methamphetamine use accounted for 38 percent of all admissions in 28. Admissions due to alcohol use accounted for roughly 29 percent of admissions, marijuana for 18 percent of admissions, heroin for 5 percent of admissions, and crack/cocaine for 5 percent in 28. Admission rates were highest among Blacks and American Indians, 9,126 and 1,414 per 1, in 28, respectively. These rates were significantly higher than each other race/ethnicity group. The highest rate of admissions was for 35 to 44 year olds with a rate of 2,647 per 1, in 28. The next highest rate was for 25 to 34 year olds with a rate of 2,288 per 1,. 18 to 24 year olds and 45 to 54 year olds also had high rates of admission, 1,56 and 1,44, respectively. Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime Crime rates for felony and misdemeanor drug offenses increased from 1,448 per 1, in 2 to 1,68 per 1, in 28. s drug arrest rate was much higher than the state each year. Arrests due to dangerous drug offenses accounted for approximately 16 percent in 28, narcotics for roughly 6 percent of drug arrests, marijuana for 34 percent of drug arrests, and 44 percent of drug arrests in 28 were for other drug violations. Drug arrest rates were highest among Blacks, 8,645 per 1, in 28. These rates far exceeded each other race/ethnicity group each year. The highest rate of arrests for drug related crime was for 25 to 34 year olds with a rate of 3,248 per 1, in 28. The next highest rate was for 18 to 24 year olds with a rate of 3,224 per 1,. 35 to 44 year olds also had a high drug arrest rate at 2,529 per 1, in 28. Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Key Findings, California 3
9 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime Crime rates for felony and misdemeanor alcohol offenses decreased from 2,48 per 1, in 2 to 2,319 per 1, in 28. s alcohol arrest rate was significantly higher than the state overall each year. Arrests due to driving under the influence accounted for approximately 62 percent in 28, public drunkenness for roughly 33 percent of alcohol arrests, and 5 percent of alcohol arrests in 28 were for liquor law violations. Alcohol arrest rates were highest among Blacks, 5,68 per 1, in 28. These rates exceeded each other race/ethnicity group each year. The highest rate of arrests for alcohol related crime was for 25 to 34 year olds with a rate of 3,876 per 1, in 28. The next highest rates were for 25 to 34 year olds and 35 to 44 year olds at 3,497 and 3,272 per 1,, respectively. Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents The rate of fatalities in alcohol involved accidents was similar to the state in 24 and 27, but significantly higher than the state overall each other year. Males accounted for nearly three fourths of total parties who had been drinking in alcohol involved accidents in 28. During this year Blacks had the rate of 194 per 1,, Hispanics had 192 per 1, and Whites had 199 per 1,. 18 to 24 year olds (552 per 1,) accounted for the highest rate of parties who had been drinking in alcohol involved accidents in 28. The next highest rates were for 25 to 34 year olds and 35 to 44 year olds at 443 and 322 per 1,, respectively. Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use The rate of hospitalizations due to alcohol and drug use decreased from 232 per 1, in 2 to 221 per 1, in 27. s AOD hospitalization rate was higher than the state overall each year, except in 21 and 26. The rate of hospitalizations due to alcohol related causes decreased from 97 per 1, in 2 to 79 per 1, in 27, after peaking in 23 at 98 per 1, and 25 at 99 per 1,. The rate of hospitalizations due to drug related causes increased from 135 per 1, in 2 to 142 per 1, in 27. s drug related hospitalization rate was higher than the state overall each year, except in 21 and 25. Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use The death rate due to alcohol and drug use increased between 2 and 27 from deaths per 1, to deaths per 1,. s AOD mortality rate was much higher than the state overall each year. The death rate due to alcohol use increased between 2 and 27 from 8.7 per 1, to 2.85 per 1,, higher than the statewide rates starting in 21. The death rate due to drug use increased between 2 and 27 from per 1, to 23.4 per 1,, higher than the statewide rates. Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Key Findings, California 4
10 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Summary of Indicators, California 5 Key Indicators of Community Alcohol and Drug Use y INDICATOR 1: Past Year Binge Drinking Data not available for reporting year. County Percentage of Total Respondents 36.1% State Percentage of Total Respondents 29.7% County Ranking (of 44 Counties) 5 INDICATOR 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Three Year Average County Total Population , , , , , ,4.37 1,37.72 State Population 1 to 69 Years County Ranking (of 49 Counties) INDICATOR 3: Arrests for Drug Related Offenses County Population 1 to 69 Years 1, ,59.8 1, , , , , , , , State Population 1 to 69 Years ,23.8 1,7.18 1, County Ranking (of 58 Counties) INDICATOR 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Offenses County Population 1 to 69 Years 2, , , , , , , , , , State Population 1 to 69 Years 1, , ,126. 1, , , , , , ,162.9 County Ranking (of 58 Counties) INDICATOR 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accident Fatalities County Total Population State Total Population County Ranking (of 58 Counties) INDICATOR 6: Alcohol and Drug Use Hospitalizations County Total Population State Total Population County Ranking (of 5 Counties) INDICATOR 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use County Total Population State Total Population County Ranking (of 58 Counties)
11 Indicator 1: Prevalence of Past Year Binge Drinking The estimated number and percent of persons 18 years and older who reported any binge drinking in the past year. Table/Figure 1.1 Estimated Number and Percent of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year with Comparison to Statewide Rates 4% 35% County California 27 Mendocino County State of California 3% 25% Estimated Number * 25, 7,973, Estimated Population 18 and over 68, 26,874, Percent of Total Population 36.1% 29.7% * Estimates rounded to the nearest thousand. 2% 15% 1% 5% % Table/Figure 1.2 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Gender 27 Mendocino County State of California 6% County California Male Estimated Number * 16, 5,39, 5% Estimated Population 33, 13,179, 4% Percent of Population 48.5% 38.2% 3% Female Estimated Number * 8, 2,934, 2% Estimated Population 34, 13,694, Percent of Population 24.% 21.4% * Estimates rounded to the nearest thousand. 1% % Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevalence of Binge Drinking, California 6
12 Indicator 1: Prevalence of Past Year Binge Drinking (Continued) Table 1.3 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Race/Ethnicity 27 State of California American Indian Estimated Number * 4, 55, Estimated Population 5, 17, Percent of Population 8.6% 32.5% Asian/Pacific Islander Estimated Number * 65, Estimated Population 1, 3,57, Percent of Population 18.5% Black Estimated Number * 31, Estimated Population 1,531, Percent of Population 19.6% Hispanic Estimated Number * 3, 2,745, Estimated Population 1, 8,469, Percent of Population 3.% 32.4% White Estimated Number * 17, 4,93, Estimated Population 51, 12,797, Percent of Population 33.9% 32.% Other Estimated Number * 129, Estimated Population 1, 41, Percent of Population 32.3% * Estimates rounded to the nearest thousand. Estimate not reported due to small sample size. 9% County California Figure 1.3 Past Year Binge Drinking in by Race/Ethnicity 8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Other Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevalence of Binge Drinking, California 7
13 Indicator 1: Prevalence of Past Year Binge Drinking (Continued) Table 1.4 Estimated Number of Persons 18 Years and Older Reporting Any Binge Drinking in the Past Year by Age Category 27 State of California 18 to 24 Estimated Number * 3, 1,62, Estimated Population 6, 3,73, Percent of Population 51.3% 43.8% 25 to 34 Estimated Number * 7, 2,147, Estimated Population 11, 4,733, Percent of Population 66.1% 45.4% 35 to 44 Estimated Number * 4, 1,795, Estimated Population 12, 5,593, Percent of Population 37.4% 32.1% 45 to 54 Estimated Number * 6, 1,39, Estimated Population 15, 5,219, Percent of Population 41.4% 26.6% 55 to 64 Estimated Number * 2, 7, Estimated Population 12, 3,724, Percent of Population 2.7% 18.8% 65 and Over Estimated Number * 1, 321, Estimated Population 12, 3,91, Percent of Population 9.2% 8.2% * Estimates rounded to the nearest thousand. 7% County California Figure 1.4 Past Year Binge Drinking in by Age Category 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% % 18 to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevalence of Binge Drinking, California 8
14 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment The number of admissions to publicly funded alcohol and other drug treatment facilities in California and rate of admission per 1, total population. Treatment Data Clarifications Findings for Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment are based on total admissions rather than unique client counts. Clients with multiple treatment admissions during the year tend to bias the demographic and service characteristics described. These findings include admissions for both detoxification and other treatment services. Detoxification services are short term, often repeated numerous times, and used primarily for alcohol or heroin treatment. The inclusion of admissions to detoxification services biases the demographic and service characteristics described. The Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act (SACPA) was implemented in July 21. Clients referred by the criminal justice system compete for limited treatment services resources and are often given priority over clients referred by other sources. In 2, criminal justice referrals made up only 26 percent of all admissions. By 24, criminal justice referrals made up 42% of the admissions. The influx of these clients with their specific demographic and service characteristics impact the makeup of the treatment population described in the key findings. For instance, clients referred by the criminal justice system rarely use detoxification services, and more often have a primary drug other than alcohol. Also, SACPA referred clients do not frequently use narcotic replacement treatment for heroin/opiate abuse. Consequently, the number of admissions to detoxification services has decreased as well as the number of admissions with alcohol or heroin as their primary drug problem compared with pre SACPA levels. Table 2.1 Number of Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Treatment Admissions 786 1, , ,5 955 Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, , , , , , ,4.37 CALIFORNIA Figure 2.1 Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates 1,4 1,3 1,2 1,1 1, County California Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 9
15 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table/Figure 2.2 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Gender, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions TOTAL ADMISSIONS 786 1, , ,5 955 Male Population 43,142 43,646 44,95 44,559 44,855 44,997 45,148 45,485 45,828 1, , , , , , , , ,28.88 Percent of Total 55.9% 58.9% 57.8% 57.4% 59.% 57.3% 59.% 61.3% 61.5% Female Population 43,594 44,43 44,441 44,849 45,111 45,222 45,361 45,654 45, , , Percent of Total 44.1% 41.1% 42.2% 42.6% 41.% 42.7% 41.% 38.7% 38.5% Figure 2.2 Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Population by Client Gender 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 1
16 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.3 Treatment Admissions by Primary Drug Type, Percent of Total Admissions, and Population TOTAL ADMISSIONS 786 1, , ,5 955 Methamphetamines Percent of Total 3.5% 37.5% 46.9% 44.7% 41.1% 44.% 47.6% 43.3% 38.2% Alcohol Percent of Total 36.4% 24.8% 24.7% 27.1% 29.4% 28.4% 25.5% 32.% 28.9% Marijuana Percent of Total 17.4% 22.7% 16.2% 13.8% 18.9% 16.3% 18.7% 16.2% 17.7% Heroin Percent of Total 9.2% 8.3% 6.8% 8.7% 4.1% 5.3% 3.5% 2.6% 4.8% Crack/Cocaine Percent of Total 1.7% 1.6% 1.4%.9% 1.5% 1.4% 1.6% 1.6% 5.% Other Drugs Percent of Total 4.8% 5.% 3.9% 4.8% 4.9% 4.6% 3.1% 4.3% 5.3% Figure 2.3 Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Population by Primary Drug Type Meth Alcohol Marijuana Heroin Crack/Cocaine Other Drugs Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 11
17 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.4 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Race/Ethnicity, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions TOTAL ADMISSIONS 786 1, , ,5 955 American Indian Population 3,482 3,91 4,38 4,651 4,918 4,964 5,43 5,244 5,447 2,24.9 2, , , , , ,29.6 1, , Percent of Total 9.9% 1.3% 11.7% 8.3% 8.7% 8.5% 6.9% 6.6% 8.1% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1,162 1,166 1,172 1,178 1,182 1,186 1,197 1,28 1, Percent of Total.4%.3%.8%.3%.6%.8%.1%.6%.4% Black Population , , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 2.7% 1.7% 1.2% 2.2% 1.7% 1.9% 1.7% 2.% 4.9% Hispanic Population 14,261 14,811 15,328 14,861 16,353 16,751 17,161 17,66 18, Percent of Total 5.6% 8.9% 6.6% 8.3% 1.2% 9.4% 12.5% 12.1% 14.7% White Population 65,49 65,351 65,225 65,161 64,938 64,754 64,619 64,497 64, , , , , , , Percent of Total 81.% 78.6% 79.5% 8.6% 78.7% 79.% 72.8% 73.9% 67.1% Other Percent of Total.4%.3%.2%.2%.1%.4% 5.9% 4.8% 4.8% Figure 2.4 Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Population by Client Race/ Ethnicity 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 12
18 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.5 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment by Client Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Admissions TOTAL ADMISSIONS 786 1, , , Years and Under Population 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2, Percent of Total 6.2% 12.1% 8.2% 1.3% 1.8% 8.1% 5.9% 3.7% 6.1% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9,981 9,958 1, , , , , , , , ,56.33 Percent of Total 15.5% 17.7% 16.4% 17.8% 15.6% 17.6% 2.% 18.5% 15.7% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1,269 1,839 2, , , , , , , , ,288.3 Percent of Total 27.% 26.2% 29.7% 25.2% 22.1% 25.7% 29.4% 27.8% 26.% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1,454 1,24 2, , , , , ,62.9 2, , , Percent of Total 33.1% 28.6% 28.% 29.8% 32.5% 31.4% 27.6% 29.1% 28.4% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13,571 13, ,8.37 1, ,21.9 1,439.5 Percent of Total 15.8% 13.1% 14.6% 13.2% 15.9% 14.3% 13.4% 16.2% 19.9% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13,266 13, Percent of Total 2.2% 2.2% 2.7% 3.4% 2.4% 2.6% 3.3% 4.6% 3.7% 65 Years and Older Population 11,793 11,916 12,11 12,15 12,296 12,5 12,75 12,999 13, Percent of Total.3%.1%.3%.3%.8%.4%.3%.2%.3% Figure 2.5 Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Population by Client Age Category 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 1 to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 13
19 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.6 Characteristics of Clients Admitted to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment and Population TOTAL COUNTY ADMISSIONS 786 1, , ,5 955 Age Initiated Substance Use Under Age Rate Per 1, Age 11 to Rate Per 1, Age 13 to Rate Per 1, Age 15 to Rate Per 1, Age 18 to Rate Per 1, Age 21 and Older Rate Per 1, IV Drug Users Number Rate Per 1, Pregnant Number Female Population 43,594 44,43 44,441 44,849 45,111 45,222 45,361 45,654 45,966 Rate Per 1, Figure 2.6 Age of Substance Use Initiation Rate per 1, Population Under Age 1 Age 11 to 12 Age 13 to 14 Age 15 to 17 Age 18 to 2 Age 21 and Older Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 14
20 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.7 AOD Treatment Admissions by Primary Drug Type, Percent of Total Admissions, and Population to 17 Years TOTAL ADMISSIONS UNDER AGE Methamphetamines Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total 12.2% 17.5% 18.7% 22.8% 11.4% 5.7% 9.6% 1.8% 1.7% Alcohol Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total 22.4% 16.1% 2.% 19.6% 17.1% 21.8% 25.% 32.4% 29.3% Marijuana Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total 59.2% 65.% 61.3% 51.1% 7.5% 7.1% 61.5% 48.6% 62.1% Heroin 1 Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total.%.%.% 1.1%.%.%.%.%.% Crack/Cocaine Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total 2.%.7%.% 3.3% 1.% 1.1% 1.9% 2.7% 3.4% Other Drugs Population to 17 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2,513 Percent of Total 4.1%.7%.% 2.2%.% 1.1% 1.9% 5.4% 3.4% Figure 2.7 Underage Treatment Admission Rate per 1, Population to 17 by Primary Drug Type Meth Alcohol Marijuana Heroin Crack/Cocaine Other Drugs Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 15
21 Indicator 2: Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment (Continued) Table 2.8 AOD Treatment Admissions among Youth Under Age 18 by Client Gender and Race/Ethnicity, Population to 17 Years, and Percent of Total Admissions TOTAL ADMISSIONS UNDER AGE Male Population to 17 11,276 11,234 11,123 11,65 1,91 1,699 1,552 1,527 1, Percent of Total 65.3% 69.3% 57.3% 67.4% 71.4% 74.7% 71.2% 75.7% 6.3% Female Population to 17 1,773 1,78 1,613 1,511 1,395 1,241 1,116 1,72 1, Percent of Total 34.7% 3.7% 42.7% 32.6% 28.6% 25.3% 28.8% 24.3% 39.7% American Indian Population to 17 1,194 1,32 1,395 1,456 1,493 1,458 1,446 1,468 1, , ,3.22 1, Percent of Total 2.4% 1.9% 16.% 16.3% 17.1% 12.6% 13.5% 13.5% 2.7% Asian/Pacific Islander Population to , Percent of Total 2.%.7% 4.% 1.1%.%.%.%.%.% Black Population to , , Percent of Total.%.7% 1.3% 3.3% 1.9% 1.1%.%.%.% Hispanic Population to 17 5,87 5,967 6,83 6,28 6,32 6,48 6,512 6,658 6,748 Rate per 1, Percent of Total 4.1% 2.4% 14.7% 22.8% 29.5% 35.6% 42.3% 4.5% 5.% White Population to 17 13,854 13,51 13,75 12,719 12,289 11,896 11,589 11,363 11, Percent of Total 73.5% 66.4% 64.% 55.4% 51.4% 5.6% 4.4% 4.5% 19.% Other Percent of Total.%.7%.% 1.1%.%.% 3.8% 5.4% 1.3% Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol and Drug Treatment, California 16
22 Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime The number of felony and misdemeanor arrests for drug crimes, including dangerous drugs, narcotics, marijuana, and other drug violations and rate per 1, population 1 to 69 years. Table 3.1 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses and Population 1 to 69 Years with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Drug Related Arrests 969 1,82 1,1 1,217 1,144 1,337 1,271 1,313 1,21 Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71,47 1, ,59.8 1, , , , , , ,68.43 CALIFORNIA ,23.8 1,7.18 1, Figure 3.1 Drug Arrest Rate per 1, Population 1 to 69 with Comparison to Statewide Rates 2, 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 County California Table 3.2 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Gender, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 969 1,82 1,1 1,217 1,144 1,337 1,271 1,313 1,21 Male Population 1 to 69 33,827 34,38 34,911 35,33 35,66 35,748 35,825 35,992 36,161 2, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 75.% 71.9% 72.5% 71.4% 71.8% 71.3% 7.3% 69.4% 71.5% Female Population 1 to 69 33,19 33,636 34,72 34,418 34,727 34,874 34,96 35,141 35, , , , , Percent of Total 25.% 28.1% 27.5% 28.6% 28.2% 28.7% 29.7% 3.6% 28.5% Figure 3.2 Drug Arrest Rate per 1, Population 1 to 69 by Offender Gender 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drug Related Crime, California 17
23 Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime (Continued) Table 3.3 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Specific Offense, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 969 1,82 1,1 1,217 1,144 1,337 1,271 1,313 1,21 Dangerous Drugs Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71, Percent of Total 28.8% 26.6% 27.5% 25.6% 3.1% 26.7% 22.5% 21.2% 15.6% Narcotics Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71, Percent of Total 4.3% 3.% 3.2% 3.9% 4.6% 4.1% 5.2% 4.1% 6.2% Marijuana Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71, Percent of Total 36.9% 33.1% 26.3% 25.6% 23.8% 18.8% 22.7% 22.5% 33.9% Other Drug Violations Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71, Percent of Total 29.9% 37.3% 43.1% 44.8% 41.5% 5.4% 49.6% 52.1% 44.4% 1,2 Figure 3.3 Drug Arrest Rate per 1, Population 1 to 69 by Specific Offense 1, Dangerous Drugs Narcotics Marijuana Other Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drug Related Crime, California 18
24 Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime (Continued) Table 3.4 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Race/Ethnicity, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 969 1,82 1,1 1,217 1,144 1,337 1,271 1,313 1,21 American Indian Population 1 to 69 2,666 3,4 3,383 3,68 3,931 3,997 4,64 4,228 4,377 2, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 6.% 7.9% 7.6% 7.4% 8.4% 9.7% 9.% 8.5% 7.1% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1 to ,1 1, , 1,3 1,2 1,7 1, ,. 1,21.2 1, ,97.8 1, Percent of Total 1.%.7% 1.% 1.% 1.2%.6%.7%.8% 1.5% Black Population 1 to ,71.3 6, ,5.51 6, , , , , , Percent of Total 2.7% 2.2% 2.% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5% 3.3% 3.% 3.1% Hispanic Population 1 to 69 1,575 11,75 11,549 11,993 12,428 12,793 13,118 13,499 13,86 1, , ,35.4 1, , ,248.2 Percent of Total 11.% 11.2% 1.6% 9.6% 1.5% 12.5% 12.9% 17.1% 14.4% White Population 1 to 69 5,87 51,58 51,221 51,247 51,223 51,136 5,969 5,746 5,535 1, , , , , , , ,89.1 1, Percent of Total 78.5% 77.4% 78.4% 79.2% 77.3% 74.1% 73.4% 69.9% 73.2% Other Percent of Total.7%.6%.4%.6%.3%.6%.7%.6%.7% 12, Figure 3.4 Drug Arrest Rate per 1, Population 1 to 69 by Offender Race/ Ethnicity 1, 8, 6, 4, 2, American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drug Related Crime, California 19
25 Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime (Continued) Table 3.5 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Offender Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 969 1,82 1,1 1,217 1,144 1,337 1,271 1,313 1,21 17 Years and Under Population 1 to 17 1,961 11,42 1,969 1,725 1,56 1,255 9,956 9,7 9,413 1,4.5 1, , , , ,19.87 Percent of Total 11.8% 15.6% 12.6% 14.5% 12.1% 7.6% 5.9% 6.8% 8.% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9,981 9,958 3, , ,125. 3, , ,29.7 3,45.7 3, , Percent of Total 27.2% 22.6% 26.% 28.3% 28.3% 31.3% 27.% 27.5% 26.7% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1,269 1,839 2, ,9.35 2, , , , , , , Percent of Total 25.9% 25.9% 24.9% 23.9% 25.3% 25.7% 28.9% 28.3% 29.3% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1,454 1,24 1, , , , , , , , ,529.3 Percent of Total 24.9% 25.1% 26.% 22.4% 22.6% 23.3% 24.5% 23.3% 21.6% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13,571 13, , , Percent of Total 8.5% 9.1% 9.7% 9.9% 9.6% 1.2% 11.5% 11.2% 1.7% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13,266 13, Percent of Total 1.8% 1.5%.9% 1.% 1.8% 1.9% 2.2% 2.7% 3.5% 65 Years and Older Population 65 to 69 3,81 3,143 3,225 3,314 3,453 3,588 3,693 3,892 4, Percent of Total.%.1%.%.%.3%.%.%.2%.2% Figure 3.5 Drug Arrest Rate per 1, Population by Offender Age Category 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1 to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drug Related Crime, California 2
26 Indicator 3: Arrests for Drug Related Crime (Continued) Table 3.6 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Drug Offenses by Gender and Race/Ethnicity among Underage Offenders, Population 1 to 17 Years, and Percent of Total Drug Arrests ALL DRUG ARRESTS UNDER AGE Male Population 1 to 17 5,623 5,658 5,633 5,541 5,412 5,259 5,96 4,959 4,82 1, , , , , , , , ,436.9 Percent of Total 73.7% 75.7% 75.4% 72.2% 71.% 68.6% 72.% 65.2% 71.9% Female Population 1 to 17 5,338 5,384 5,336 5,184 5,94 4,996 4,86 4,741 4, Percent of Total 26.3% 24.3% 24.6% 27.8% 29.% 31.4% 28.% 34.8% 28.1% American Indian Population 1 to , , ,8.55 1, , Percent of Total 4.4% 14.2% 9.5% 7.4% 7.2% 9.8% 8.% 5.6% 6.3% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1 to , , , ,3.93 2, Percent of Total 2.6% 1.2%.8%.6% 1.4%.% 1.3% 2.2%.% Black Population 1 to , , , , ,. 7, , , , Percent of Total 1.8% 1.2% 2.4% 2.3% 2.9% 3.9% 1.3% 1.1% 5.2% Hispanic Population 1 to 17 2,356 2,485 2,581 2,651 2,73 2,811 2,86 2,919 2, , , Percent of Total 16.7% 21.3% 13.5% 14.8% 22.5% 17.6% 25.3% 29.2% 29.2% White Population 1 to 17 7,442 7,343 7,155 6,866 6,575 6,274 5,961 5,649 5,397 1, ,42.7 1, , , , ,37.61 Percent of Total 73.7% 6.9% 73.8% 74.4% 65.9% 68.6% 64.% 61.8% 58.3% Other Percent of Total.9% 1.2%.%.6%.%.%.%.% 1.% Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drug Related Crime, California 21
27 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime The number of felony and misdemeanor arrests for driving under the influence, drunkenness, and, liquor law violations and rate per 1, population 1 to 69 years. Table 4.1 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses, Population 1 to 69 Years with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Alcohol Related Arrests 1,612 1,622 1,579 1,553 1,344 1,373 1,8 1,692 1,657 Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71,47 2, , , , , , , , , CALIFORNIA 1, , ,126. 1, , , , , ,23.37 Figure 4.1 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 with Comparison to Statewide Rates 2,8 2,6 2,4 2,2 2, 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 County California Table 4.2 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Gender, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 1,612 1,622 1,579 1,553 1,344 1,373 1,8 1,692 1,657 Male 1,333 1,314 1,32 1,245 1,97 1,116 1,428 1,342 1,323 Population 1 to 69 33,827 34,38 34,911 35,33 35,66 35,748 35,825 35,992 36,161 3, , , , ,8.94 3, , , , Percent of Total 82.7% 81.% 82.5% 8.2% 81.6% 81.3% 79.3% 79.3% 79.8% Female Population 1 to 69 33,19 33,636 34,72 34,418 34,727 34,874 34,96 35,141 35, , Percent of Total 17.3% 19.% 17.5% 19.8% 18.4% 18.7% 2.7% 2.7% 2.2% Figure 4.2 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Gender 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol Related Crime, California 22
28 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime (Continued) Table 4.3 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Specific Offense, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 1,612 1,622 1,579 1,553 1,344 1,373 1,8 1,692 1,657 Driving Under the Influence ,9 1,2 1,27 Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71,47 1, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 54.2% 48.5% 47.5% 55.4% 58.2% 55.4% 6.6% 6.3% 62.% Drunk Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71,47 1, , , Percent of Total 42.3% 44.5% 45.9% 37.% 35.1% 38.5% 34.6% 37.% 32.8% Liquor Law Violations Population 1 to 69 66,936 68,16 68,983 69,721 7,333 7,622 7,785 71,133 71, Percent of Total 3.5% 7.% 6.6% 7.6% 6.7% 6.1% 4.9% 2.7% 5.2% Figure 4.3 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Specific Offense 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, Driving Under the Influence Drunk Liquor Law Violations Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol Related Crime, California 23
29 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime (Continued) Table 4.4 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Race/Ethnicity, Population 1 to 69 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 1,612 1,622 1,579 1,553 1,344 1,373 1,8 1,692 1,657 American Indian Population 1 to 69 2,666 3,4 3,383 3,68 3,931 3,997 4,64 4,228 4,377 3, , , , , , , , ,81.14 Percent of Total 6.1% 5.4% 6.9% 7.% 6.4% 6.% 5.9% 6.4% 7.4% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1 to ,1 1, , 1,3 1,2 1, ,2. 1, , ,92.35 Percent of Total.5%.5%.8%.8%.4%.4%.8%.4%.7% Black Population 1 to , , , , , , , , ,67.48 Percent of Total 1.9% 1.% 2.% 1.2% 1.% 1.2% 1.6% 2.% 1.4% Hispanic Population 1 to 69 1,575 11,75 11,549 11,993 12,428 12,793 13,118 13,499 13,86 2, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 16.4% 17.3% 18.5% 19.2% 18.6% 16.3% 17.4% 19.7% 17.9% White 1,194 1,21 1,97 1, ,14 1,31 1,176 1,172 Population 1 to 69 5,87 51,58 51,221 51,247 51,223 51,136 5,969 5,746 5,535 2, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 74.1% 74.% 69.5% 69.7% 71.6% 73.9% 72.8% 69.5% 7.7% Other Percent of Total 1.1% 1.7% 2.4% 2.1% 1.9% 2.3% 1.4% 2.% 1.8% Figure 4.4 Alcohol Arrest Population 1 to 69 by Offender Race/ Ethnicity 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol Related Crime, California 24
30 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime (Continued) Table 4.5 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Offender Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests TOTAL ARRESTS 1,612 1,622 1,579 1,553 1,344 1,373 1,8 1,692 1, Years and Under Population 1 to 17 1,961 11,42 1,969 1,725 1,56 1,255 9,956 9,7 9, , , ,14.85 Percent of Total 5.8% 6.7% 6.9% 8.1% 8.4% 6.2% 4.7% 4.4% 6.3% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9,981 9,958 4, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 21.% 21.6% 24.1% 22.7% 23.5% 23.5% 22.4% 21.5% 23.3% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1,269 1,839 4, , , , , , , , , Percent of Total 26.2% 2.8% 2.% 19.8% 21.7% 19.8% 21.6% 23.2% 22.9% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1,454 1,24 3,6.48 3, , , , , , , , Percent of Total 27.7% 27.9% 25.1% 23.6% 19.6% 21.9% 2.6% 2.2% 2.2% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13,571 13,199 1, , , , , ,98.5 2, ,52.8 2, Percent of Total 14.4% 16.7% 17.1% 18.2% 18.8% 21.4% 22.8% 2.2% 18.9% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13,266 13, , Percent of Total 3.3% 5.1% 5.4% 6.5% 6.5% 5.8% 6.% 9.1% 7.1% 65 Years and Older Population 65 to 69 3,81 3,143 3,225 3,314 3,453 3,588 3,693 3,892 4, Percent of Total 1.6% 1.2% 1.4% 1.1% 1.4% 1.4% 1.9% 1.5% 1.3% Figure 4.5 Alcohol Arrest Population by Offender Age Category 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1 to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol Related Crime, California 25
31 Indicator 4: Arrests for Alcohol Related Crime (Continued) Table 4.6 Number of Arrests for Felony and Misdemeanor Alcohol Offenses by Gender and Race/Ethnicity among Underage Offenders, Population 1 to 17 Years, and Percent of Total Alcohol Arrests ALL ALCOHOL ARRESTS UNDER AGE Male Population 1 to 17 5,623 5,658 5,633 5,541 5,412 5,259 5,96 4,959 4,82 1, , , , , , , , ,353.6 Percent of Total 72.% 63.9% 64.2% 74.6% 75.2% 72.9% 77.4% 68.9% 62.5% Female Population 1 to 17 5,338 5,384 5,336 5,184 5,94 4,996 4,86 4,741 4, Percent of Total 28.% 36.1% 35.8% 25.4% 24.8% 27.1% 22.6% 31.1% 37.5% American Indian Population 1 to , , , ,8.55 2, , , , Percent of Total 16.1% 8.3% 8.3% 1.3% 17.7% 12.9% 13.1% 8.1% 1.6% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1 to , , , , Percent of Total.%.% 1.8%.8%.% 2.4% 1.2%.% 1.9% Black Population 1 to , , ,... 7, ,918.3 Percent of Total 4.3%.%.%.8%.9%.%.% 5.4% 2.9% Hispanic Population 1 to 17 2,356 2,485 2,581 2,651 2,73 2,811 2,86 2,919 2, , ,38.6 Percent of Total 1.8% 13.% 18.3% 21.4% 13.3% 18.8% 23.8% 27.% 28.8% White Population 1 to 17 7,442 7,343 7,155 6,866 6,575 6,274 5,961 5,649 5, , , , , ,74.67 Percent of Total 66.7% 78.7% 7.6% 65.1% 66.4% 64.7% 6.7% 59.5% 55.8% Other Percent of Total 2.2%.%.9% 1.6% 1.8% 1.2% 1.2%.%.% Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Alcohol Related Crime, California 26
32 Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents The number of alcohol involved motor vehicle accidents and number of persons injured or killed and rate per 1, population Table 5.1 Fatalities in Alcohol Involved Accidents and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Fatalities Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 5.1 Alcohol Involved Accident Fatality Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Table 5.2 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Gender and Population, and Percent of Total TOTAL HAD BEEN DRINKING DRIVERS Male Population 43,142 43,646 44,95 44,559 44,855 44,997 45,148 45,485 45, Percent of Total 79.3% 75.5% 8.1% 75.% 77.6% 77.% 76.6% 76.9% 74.3% Female Population 43,594 44,43 44,441 44,849 45,111 45,222 45,361 45,654 45, Percent of Total 2.2% 22.6% 16.2% 22.4% 2.6% 22.4% 22.2% 2.3% 21.9% Unknown Percent of Total.5% 1.9% 3.7% 2.6% 1.8%.6% 1.2% 2.7% 3.7% Figure 5.2 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Gender Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drinking and Driving, California 27
33 Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents (Continued) Table 5.3 Alcohol Involved Accidents by Injury Severity, Total Population, and Percent of Total TOTAL ALCOHOL INVOLVED ACCIDENTS Property Damage Only (PDO) Total Population 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, Percent of Total 43.2% 44.% 45.5% 54.4% 45.9% Injury Complaint of Pain Total Population 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, Percent of Total 16.% 11.3% 12.% 1.% 9.8% Injury Other Visible Total Population 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, Percent of Total 25.4% 26.4% 25.1% 21.7% 23.5% Injury Severe Total Population 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, Percent of Total 13.6% 1.7% 12.6% 11.7% 12.% Injury Fatal Total Population 89,966 9,219 9,59 91,139 91, Percent of Total 1.8% 7.5% 4.8% 2.2% 8.7% 12 Figure 5.3 Alcohol Involved Accident Rate per 1, Total Population, by Injury Severity PDO Complaint of Pain Other Visible Injury Severe Injury Fatal Injury Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drinking and Driving, California 28
34 Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents (Continued) Table 5.4 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Race/Ethnicity, Population, and Percent of Total TOTAL HAD BEEN DRINKING DRIVERS Black Population Percent of Total 1.%.% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2%.%.5% Hispanic Population 15,328 14,861 16,353 16,751 17,161 17,66 18, Percent of Total 15.2% 24.% 21.2% 16.1% 19.3% 15.9% 18.7% White Population 65,225 65,161 64,938 64,754 64,619 64,497 64, Percent of Total 69.1% 59.7% 67.6% 74.5% 67.8% 7.9% 68.4% Other/Unknown Percent of Total 14.7% 16.3% 1.% 8.1% 11.7% 13.2% 12.3% Figure 5.4 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Race/ Ethnicity Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drinking and Driving, California 29
35 Indicator 5: Alcohol Involved Motor Vehicle Accidents (Continued) Table 5.5 Parties in Alcohol Involved Accidents Who Had Been Drinking by Party Age Category and Population, and Percent of Total TOTAL HAD BEEN DRINKING DRIVERS Years and Under Population 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2,599 2, Percent of Total 1.5% 1.3% 4.2% 5.1% 2.4% 2.5%.6% 1.1% 2.1% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9,981 9, Percent of Total 27.1% 29.6% 27.7% 3.6% 28.2% 22.4% 27.5% 2.3% 29.4% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1,269 1, Percent of Total 24.6% 19.5% 18.8% 23.% 22.4% 23.6% 19.9% 15.9% 25.7% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1,454 1, Percent of Total 19.2% 22.% 18.3% 21.4% 17.1% 21.1% 25.7% 24.7% 17.6% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13,571 13, Percent of Total 2.2% 17.6% 14.1% 8.7% 19.4% 19.9% 15.2% 19.2% 13.9% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13,266 13, Percent of Total 1.5% 5.7% 9.9% 5.6% 6.5% 6.8% 5.3% 12.1% 5.3% 65 Years and Older Population 11,793 11,916 12,11 12,15 12,296 12,5 12,75 12,999 13, Percent of Total 3.% 2.5% 2.1% 2.% 1.8% 2.5% 3.5% 2.2% 1.1% Other/Unknown Percent of Total 3.% 1.9% 4.7% 3.6% 2.4% 1.2% 2.3% 4.4% 4.8% Figure 5.5 Had Been Drinking Driver Population, by Party Age Category 1, to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Drinking and Driving, California 3
36 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use The number of hospital admissions due to alcohol and drug related causes and rate per 1, population. Table 6.1 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Hospitalizations Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 6.1 Alcohol and Drug Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Table 6.2 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Gender, Population, and Percent of Total Hospitalizations AOD HOSPITALIZATIONS Male Population 43,142 43,646 44,95 44,559 44,855 44,997 45,148 45, Percent of Total 41.29% 31.89% 35.53% 38.43% 35.5% 32.65% 27.62% 3.35% Female Population 43,594 44,43 44,441 44,849 45,111 45,222 45,361 45, Percent of Total 3.35% 32.43% 4.61% 37.5% 39.83% 37.76% 39.23% 4.3% Unknown Percent of Total 28.36% 35.68% 23.86% 24.7% 24.68% 29.59% 33.15% 29.35% 25 Figure 6.2 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Gender Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 31
37 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 6.3 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol Related Causes and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Hospitalizations Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 6.3 Alcohol Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Table 6.4 Hospitalizations Due to Drug Related Causes and Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Hospitalizations Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 6.4 Drug Related Hospitalization Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 32
38 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 6.5 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol Related Causes by Specific Cause and Total Population TOTAL ALCOHOL RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Cardiomyopathy Alcohol Dependence Syndrome Alcohol Dependent Abuse Alcohol Poisoning Alcohol Polyneuropathy Alcohol Psychosis Alcoholic Gastritis Alcoholic Liver Disease Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 33
39 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 6.6 Hospitalizations Due to Drug Related Causes by Specific Cause and Total Population TOTAL DRUG RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS Drug Psychosis Drug Polyneuropathy Dependence Barbituates Cannabis Cocaine Hallucinogen Inhalant Morphine Stimulant Combination Unspecified Maternal Drug Dependence Abuse Amphetamine Antidepressant Cannabis Cocaine Hallucinogen Morphine Sedative Other, Mixed or Unspecified Accidental Drug Poisonings Other Drug Poisonings Self Inflicted Drug Poisonings Drug Exposure in Newborns Fetal Damage due to Maternal Drug Use Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 34
40 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 6.7 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Race/Ethnicity, Rate per 1, Population, and Percent of Total Hospitalizations TOTAL AOD RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS American Indian Population 3,482 3,91 4,38 4,651 4,918 4,964 5,43 5, Percent of Total 2.5% 1.1% 3.% 2.8% 2.6%.% 1.1%.% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1,162 1,166 1,172 1,178 1,182 1,186 1,197 1, Percent of Total.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% Black 3 2 Population Percent of Total.%.%.% 1.4%.%.%.% 1.% Hispanic Population 14,261 14,811 15,328 14,861 16,353 16,751 17,161 17, Percent of Total 3.5% 1.1% 2.% 2.8% 1.3% 2.6% 1.7%.5% White Population 65,49 65,351 65,225 65,161 64,938 64,754 64,619 64, Percent of Total 61.2% 57.8% 64.5% 63.% 65.8% 62.8% 6.8% 65.7% Other/Unknown Percent of Total 32.8% 4.% 3.5% 3.1% 3.3% 34.7% 36.5% 32.8% Figure 6.5 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Race/ Ethnicity American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 35
41 Indicator 6: Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 6.8 Hospitalizations Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Patient Age Category, Population, and Percent of Total Hospitalizations TOTAL AOD RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS Years and Under Population 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2, Percent of Total 1.5%.5%.5% 1.4%.4% 1.5%.%.5% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9, Percent of Total 2.% 2.2% 2.% 2.8% 1.3% 2.% 2.8% 2.% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1, Percent of Total 5.5% 2.2% 2.5% 3.2% 1.7% 1.% 1.7% 2.5% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1, Percent of Total 8.5% 6.5% 7.6% 5.6% 7.4% 5.1% 4.4% 1.9% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13, Percent of Total 1.9% 16.8% 12.7% 18.5% 14.3% 17.9% 13.8% 16.4% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13, Percent of Total 9.5% 8.1% 8.6% 1.2% 9.5% 13.3% 13.3% 6.5% 65 Years and Older Population 11,793 11,916 12,11 12,15 12,296 12,5 12,75 12, Percent of Total 9.% 7.6% 15.7% 15.3% 16.5% 7.1% 1.5% 8.% Other/Unknown Percent of Total 53.2% 56.2% 5.3% 43.1% 48.9% 52.% 53.6% 53.2% Figure 6.6 AOD Related Hospitalization Population by Patient Age Category to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Hospitalizations, California 36
42 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use The number of deaths due to alcohol and drug related causes and age adjusted death rate per 1, population. Table 7.1 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) and Age Adjusted with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Deaths Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 7.1 Mortality Age Adjusted Rate per 1, Total Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Table 7.2 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Gender of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths TOTAL AOD RELATED DEATHS Male Population 43,142 43,646 44,95 44,559 44,855 44,997 45,148 45, Percent of Total 6.% 6.% 63.33% 58.33% 65.38% 46.88% 74.42% 47.5% Female Population 43,594 44,43 44,441 44,849 45,111 45,222 45,361 45, Percent of Total 4.% 4.% 36.67% 41.67% 34.62% 53.13% 25.58% 52.5% Figure 7.2 AOD Related Mortality Rate per 1, Population by Decedent Gender Male Female Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 37
43 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 7.3 Deaths Due to Alcohol Related Causes and Total Population, with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Deaths Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 7.3 Alcohol Related Mortality Rate per 1, Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Table 7.4 Deaths Due to Drug Related Causes and Total Population, with Comparison to Statewide Rates Number of Deaths Total Population 86,736 87,689 88,536 89,48 89,966 9,219 9,59 91, CALIFORNIA Figure 7.4 Drug Related Mortality Rate per 1, Population with Comparison to Statewide Rates County California Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 38
44 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 7.5 Deaths Due to Alcohol Related Causes by Specific Cause, and Total Population TOTAL ALCOHOL RELATED DEATHS Alcohol Psychosis Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Dependence Syndrome Alcoholic Polyneuropathy Degeneration of the Nervous System Alcoholic Myopathy Alcoholic Cardiomyopathy Alcoholic Gastritis Alcoholic Liver Disease Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Fetus and Newborn Affect by Maternal Use of Alcohol Alcohol Poisoning Intentional Self Poisoning (Alcohol) Excessive Blood Level of Alcohol Alcohol Induced Pancreatitis Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 39
45 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 7.6 Deaths Due to Drug Related Causes by Specific Cause, and Total Population TOTAL DRUG RELATED DEATHS Accidental Drug Poisoning Intentional Self Poisoning (Drug) Intentional Poisoning (Assault) Other Drug Poisonings Fetus and Newborn Affect by Maternal Use of Drugs Mental and Behavioral Disorders due to Use of Cannabinoids Cocaine Hallucinogens Opioids Other Psychoactive Substances Sedatives or Hypnotics Solvents Stimulants Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 4
46 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 7.7 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Race/Ethnicity of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths TOTAL AOD RELATED DEATHS American Indian Population 3,482 3,91 4,38 4,651 4,918 4,964 5,43 5, Percent of Total 5.% 8.% 2.% 5.6% 7.7% 6.3%.% 1.% Asian/Pacific Islander Population 1,162 1,166 1,172 1,178 1,182 1,186 1,197 1, Percent of Total.%.%.%.%.%.%.%.% Black 1 2 Population Percent of Total.%.% 3.3%.%.%.% 4.7%.% Hispanic Population 14,261 14,811 15,328 14,861 16,353 16,751 17,161 17, Percent of Total 5.% 12.%.% 5.6%.% 6.3% 2.3%.% White Population 65,49 65,351 65,225 65,161 64,938 64,754 64,619 64, Percent of Total 9.% 8.% 76.7% 88.9% 92.3% 87.5% 9.7% 9.% Other 1 Percent of Total.%.%.%.%.%.% 2.3%.% Figure 7.5 AOD Related Mortality Rate per 1, Population by Decedent Race/ Ethnicity American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic White Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 41
47 Indicator 7: Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Use (Continued) Table 7.8 Deaths Due to Alcohol and Drug Related Causes (Combined) by Age Category of Decedent, Total Population, and Percent of Total AOD Related Deaths TOTAL AOD RELATED DEATHS Years and Under Population 22,49 21,942 21,736 21,576 21,296 2,94 2,668 2, Percent of Total.% 8.%.% 2.8%.% 3.1% 4.7% 2.5% 18 to 24 Years Population 7,156 7,734 8,32 8,92 9,415 9,742 9,94 9, Percent of Total.%.%.%.% 3.8%.% 2.3% 5.% 25 to 34 Years Population 9,631 9,654 9,686 9,727 9,74 9,738 9,861 1, Percent of Total.%.% 1.% 5.6%.% 6.3% 4.7% 5.% 35 to 44 Years Population 12,415 12,7 11,796 11,491 11,237 1,97 1,723 1, Percent of Total 25.% 24.% 36.7% 3.6% 15.4% 9.4% 9.3% 2.% 45 to 54 Years Population 14,752 14,917 14,682 14,562 14,347 14,1 13,778 13, Percent of Total 2.% 28.% 23.3% 19.4% 42.3% 56.3% 34.9% 35.% 55 to 64 Years Population 8,94 9,456 1,35 11, 11,635 12,319 12,834 13, Percent of Total 2.% 24.% 13.3% 25.% 26.9% 18.8% 3.2% 2.% 65 Years and Older Population 11,793 11,916 12,11 12,15 12,296 12,5 12,75 12, Percent of Total 35.% 16.% 16.7% 16.7% 11.5% 6.3% 14.% 12.5% Figure 7.6 AOD Related Mortality Rate per 1, Population by Decedent Age Category to to to to to to Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse AOD Mortality, California 42
48 SOURCES Indicator Binge Drinking in the Past Year Agency UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, California Department of Health Services, Public Health Institute Print and Electronic Data Sources California Health Interview Survey (CHIS) 28 Admissions to Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP) California Alcohol and Drug Data System (CADDS) Admissions Data 2 25 California Outcome Measurement System (CalOMS) Admissions Data Alcohol and Drug Related Crime California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Criminal Justice Statistics Center California Arrest Data 2 28 Drinking and Driving California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2 28 Alcohol and Drug Related Hospitalizations Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) California Hospital Discharge Data Set, 2 27 Alcohol and Drug Related Mortality California Department of Public Health, Vital Statistics Section Death Statistical Masterfile 2 27 California Health Status Profiles 26 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Data Sources, California 43
49 This publication was prepared by the Center for Applied Research Solutions (CARS), Inc. s Community Prevention Initiative (CPI) Technical Assistance and Training contract funded by the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs (ADP). Center for Applied Research Solutions (CARS), Inc. 923 College Avenue Santa Rosa, CA 9544 Phone: (77) Fax: (77) Toll Free ( CARS) rp.org
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Nevada County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Nevada County 21 TABLE
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Orange County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Orange County 21 TABLE
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Imperial County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Imperial County
More informationSan Bernardino County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationRiverside County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Riverside County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Riverside County
More informationSanta Clara County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Santa Clara County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Santa Clara County
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Butte County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Butte County 21 TABLE
More informationEl Dorado County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties El Dorado County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties El Dorado County
More informationStanislaus County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Stanislaus County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Stanislaus County
More informationSan Francisco County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Tulare County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Tulare County 21 TABLE
More informationSan Joaquin County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationSan Luis Obispo County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationContra Costa County 2010
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties County 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Fresno County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Fresno County 21 TABLE
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Glenn County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Glenn County 21 TABLE
More informationIndicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Lassen County 21 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Lassen County 21 TABLE
More informationREVISED. Tulare County 2007
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties REVISED Tulare County 2007 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Tulare County
More informationREVISED. Stanislaus County 2007
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties REVISED Stanislaus County 2007 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Stanislaus
More informationREVISED. Humboldt County 2007
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties REVISED Humboldt County 2007 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Humboldt
More informationREVISED. Inyo County 2007
Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties REVISED Inyo County 2007 Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties Inyo County
More informationPlumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics
Plumas County Area California Highway Patrol Alcohol and Other Drugs Statistics 7/1/09 thru 6/30/10 7/1/10 thru 6/30/11 Notes/Questions Total Traffic Collisions 308 276 Total DUI Collisions 40 (13.0%)
More informationDRUG AND ALCOHOL USE
DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE Alcohol and drug use by adolescents can have immediate as well as long-term health and social consequences. Alcohol and illicit drug use by adolescents are risk-taking behaviors which
More informationFACT SHEET. Women in Treatment
FACT SHEET Women in Treatment February 2011 The data in this fact sheet are based on clients in publicly funded and/or monitored alcohol and other drug treatment services in California during State Fiscal
More informationInitial Report of Oregon s State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup. Prepared by:
Alcohol Consumption and Consequences in Oregon Prepared by: Addictions & Mental Health Division 5 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 9731-1118 To the reader, This report is one of three epidemiological profiles
More informationRisk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Spokane County
December, Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Spokane County.7-3: Research & Data Analysis Division Vera Barga, B.S. Irina V. Sharkova, Ph.D. David Mancuso, Ph.D. in conjunction
More informationTobacco, Alcohol, and
Healthier San Joaquin County Community Assessment 2011 Tobacco, Alcohol, and Drug Use Summary... 100 Indicators Tobacco Use... 101 Tobacco Use Among Pregnant Women... 103 Alcohol Consumption... 104 Adult
More informationAlcohol and Drug Abuse Services Client Demographics and Treatment Outcomes
and Drug Abuse Services Client Demographics and Treatment Outcomes Based on California Outcomes Measurement System - Treatment (26 28) Prepared by: Curtis J. Condon, PhD Alaka Nafday, MS, MSc Samantha
More informationRisk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Skamania County
December, 1 Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Skamania County.7-3:1 Research & Data Analysis Division Vera Barga, B.S. Irina V. Sharkova, Ph.D. David Mancuso, Ph.D. in conjunction
More informationMARYLAND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE: CONSEQUENCES OF ILLICIT DRUG USE, ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND SMOKING
MARYLAND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE: CONSEQUENCES OF ILLICIT DRUG USE, ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND SMOKING UPDATED MARCH 14, 2008 Prepared for The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration By The Center for Substance
More informationHospitalizations of females ages 13 and older due to assaultive injuries by spouse or partner
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TEMPLATES INDICATOR: DEFINITION: NUMERATOR: DENOMINATOR: Hospitalizations of females ages 13 and older due to assaultive injuries by spouse or partner The rate of hospitalizations
More informationRisk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Pend Oreille County
December, Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Pend Oreille County.7-: Research & Data Analysis Division Vera Barga, B.S. Irina V. Sharkova, Ph.D. David Mancuso, Ph.D. in conjunction
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Ventura County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Ventura County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391
More informationRisk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Asotin County
December, 4 Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Asotin County 4.47-:4 Research & Data Analysis Division Vera Barga, B.S. Irina V. Sharkova, Ph.D. David Mancuso, Ph.D. in conjunction
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Monterey County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Monterey County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391
More informationINTOXICATED DRIVING PROGRAM 2009 STATISTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
INTOXICATED DRIVING PROGRAM 2009 STATISTICAL SUMMARY REPORT April 2011 Prepared by: Sherry Ranieri Dolan Office of Research, Planning, Evaluation, Information Systems and Technology and Intoxicated Driving
More informationRisk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Ferry County
December, 1 Risk and Protection Profile for Substance Abuse Prevention in Ferry County.7-1:1 Research & Data Analysis Division Vera Barga, B.S. Irina V. Sharkova, Ph.D. David Mancuso, Ph.D. in conjunction
More informationDUI Offender Survey Report 2008
DUI Offender Survey Report 2008 Prepared by for April 2009 Brought to you by The Montana Community Change Project and the Institute for Public Strategies Funding provided by the State of Montana, Addictions
More informationGUIDE TO WRITING A STRATEGIC PREVENTION PLAN
Community Prevention Initiative (CPI) GUIDE TO WRITING A STRATEGIC PREVENTION PLAN Developed by: INTRODUCTION Guide to Writing a Strategic Prevention Plan Center for Applied Research Solutions (CARS) 708
More informationLUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS
LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS Research and Report Completed on 8/13/02 by Dr. Lois Ventura -1- Introduction -2- Toledo/Lucas County TASC The mission of Toledo/Lucas County Treatment Alternatives
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Santa Cruz County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Santa Cruz County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk San Bernardino County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk San Bernardino County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc.
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Imperial County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Imperial County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391
More informationINTOXICATED DRIVING PROGRAM 2010 STATISTICAL SUMMARY REPORT
INTOXICATED DRIVING PROGRAM 2010 STATISTICAL SUMMARY REPORT November 2011 Prepared by: Sherry Ranieri Dolan Office of Research, Planning, Evaluation, Information Systems and Technology and Intoxicated
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Kern County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Kern County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391 South
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Inyo County 2004
Community Indicators of Alcohol & Drug Abuse Risk Inyo County 2004 Prepared for Prepared by California Department of Center for Applied Research Alcohol and Drug Programs Solutions (CARS), Inc. 391 South
More informationHospitalizations of females ages 13 and older due to assaultive injuries by spouse or partner
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TEMPLATES INDICATOR: DEFINITION: NUMERATOR: DENOMINATOR: HEALTHY PEOPLE 2010 OBJECTIVE: Hospitalizations of females ages 13 and older due to assaultive injuries by spouse
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Mendocino County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110 Folsom,
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Sacramento County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Santa Clara County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Madera County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110 Folsom,
More informationALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING
2013 ALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: Highway Safety Program ALCOHOL AND CRIME IN WYOMING: 2013 April 2014 The analysis of the data collected by the Wyoming Association
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Kern County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110 Folsom,
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Colusa County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110 Folsom,
More informationCommunity Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk
Community Indicators of Alcohol and Drug Abuse Risk Alameda County Prepared for: California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Prepared by: EMT Group, Inc. 391 South Lexington Drive, Suite 110 Folsom,
More informationDrug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Drug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St.
More informationHospitalizations of females ages 18 and over due to violent injuries
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TEMPLATES DEFINITION: NUMERATOR: Hospitalizations of females ages 18 and over due to violent injuries The rate of hospitalizations due to assaultive injuries (E960.0-969.9) per 100,000
More informationSubstance Abuse Trends in Maine Epidemiological Profile 2013
Substance Abuse Trends in Maine Epidemiological Profile 2013 Western District Produced for Maine Department of Health and Human Services Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services by Hornby Zeller
More informationUnderage Drinking and Alcohol Abuse in Kent County, Delaware
Underage Drinking and Alcohol Abuse in Kent County, Delaware Delaware Drug and Alcohol Tracking Alliance (DDATA) Center for Drug and Alcohol Studies University of Delaware April 2013 42% of Delaware 5
More informationALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING
ALCOHOL and CRIME in WYOMING 2015 WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Safety Program ALCOHOL AND CRIME IN WYOMING: 2015 April 2016 The analysis of the data collected by the Wyoming Association
More informationCESAR BRIEFING Underage Drinking
February 2004 CESAR BRIEFING Underage Drinking CESAR Briefings are designed to provide concise answers and information on requested topics related to substance abuse, and are available online at www.cesar.umd.edu.
More informationSubstance Abuse in Washington, D.C.
Substance Abuse in Washington, D.C. Highlights from the 27 District of Columbia Epidemiological Profile: Consequences of Illicit Drug, Alcohol, and Tobacco Use Prepared by The Department of Health s (DOH)
More informationCOUNTY STRATEGIC PREVENTION PLAN RESOURCE DOCUMENT
COUNTY STRATEGIC PREVENTION PLAN RESOURCE DOCUMENT Prepared By: The Community Prevention Initiative (CPI) The Community Prevention Initiative (CPI) is a project managed by the Center for Applied Research
More informationAssessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)
Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP) Presented to: Outagamie County Presented by: Tina L. Freiburger, Ph.D., Alyssa Pfeiffer, M.S., University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee June 23,
More informationMarijuana in Washington. Arrests, Usage, and Related Data
Arrests, Usage, and Related Data Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org 10/19/2009 1 Introduction This state report is part of a comprehensive presentation of national,
More informationMarijuana in New York. Arrests, Usage, and Related Data
Arrests, Usage, and Related Data Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org November 5, 2009 1 Introduction This state report is part of a comprehensive presentation of national,
More informationStudy of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay
Study of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay Releases from the Dutchess County Jail December 2011 - October 2012 November 12, 2013 1 As part of its ongoing commitment to evidence-based criminal
More informationMarijuana in Louisiana. Arrests, Usage, and Related Data
Arrests, Usage, and Related Data Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org 10/19/2009 1 Introduction This state report is part of a comprehensive presentation of national,
More informationDrug Use and Other Risk Factors Among Juveniles Arrested in San Diego County in 2003
bulletin CJ Criminal Justice Research Division, SANDAG Drug Use and Other Risk Factors Among Juveniles Arrested in San Diego County in 2003 December 2004 Cynthia Burke, Ph.D., Division Director 401 B Street
More informationEpidemiology of Addiction
Epidemiology of Addiction M.-L. Brecht UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs California Society of Addiction Medicine Review Course Oct. 24, 2008 The presenter has no conflicts related to this material.
More informationSubstance Abuse Trends in Maine. Epidemiological Profile Central District
Substance Abuse Trends in Maine Epidemiological Profile 2013 Central District Produced for Maine Department of Health and Human Services Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services by Hornby Zeller
More informationDrug Policy Update. Misdemeanor marijuana arrests are skyrocketing. and other California marijuana enforcement disparities
CENTER ON JUVENILE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE Drug Policy Update NOVEMBER 2011 www.cjcj.org Misdemeanor marijuana arrests are skyrocketing and other California marijuana enforcement disparities by Mike Males,
More informationEvaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 2003 Report
Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act 23 Report Prepared for the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs California Health and Human Services Agency By Douglas Longshore, Ph.D., Darren
More informationMarijuana in Washington, DC. Arrests, Usage, and Related Data
Marijuana in Washington, DC Arrests, Usage, and Related Data Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org November 5, 2009 1 Introduction This state report is part of a comprehensive
More informationTobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use
Tobacco, Alcohol and Drug Use Healthier Community Assessment 2005 101 Tobacco Use Why It Is Important Cigarette smoking is the most preventable cause of disease and death in the United States. 37 Lung
More informationAlcohol Use and Abuse in Miami-Dade County, Florida James N. Hall 1
Alcohol Use and Abuse in Miami-Dade County, Florida James N. Hall 1 ABSTRACT Reports on the epidemiology of illicit substances (including the non-medical use of prescription drugs) in Miami-Dade County
More informationState of Missouri Department of Public Safety Office of the Director. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program
State of Missouri Department of Public Safety Office of the Director Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program Missouri Statewide Drug and Violent Crime Strategy FY FOREWORD On behalf
More informationEvaluation & Benefit-Cost Analysis Of Initiative 502: Findings from 2 nd Required Report
Evaluation & Benefit-Cost Analysis Of Initiative 502: Findings from 2 nd Required Report Washington State Institute For Public Policy Adam Darnell, Ph.D. November 3, 2017 Presentation Overview Study requirements
More informationPrepared by. SpotlIght. Driving Under the Influence: Students in College. Brought to you by
Prepared by Ventura County PLa C e o F La S t Dr I n K SurV ey SpotlIght Driving Under the Influence: Students in College Volume III September 28 Brought to you by SyNoPSIS Most students in the DDP are
More informationNH s Substance Misuse Epidemic: How It Impacts Your Community. Linda Saunders Paquette New Futures
NH s Substance Misuse Epidemic: How It Impacts Your Community Linda Saunders Paquette New Futures NH Has a Drug and Alcohol Epidemic Epidemic - affecting or tending to affect a disproportionately large
More informationHeroin Use in Illinois: A Ten-Year Multiple Indicator Analysis, 1998 to 2008
Heroin Use in Illinois: A Ten-Year Multiple Indicator Analysis, 1998 to 2008 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND FINDINGS Co-authored by: Stephanie Schmitz Kathleen Kane-Willis Research Support: Laura Reichel, Elizabeth
More informationGreenville County Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse The Phoenix Center. Public Report. Fiscal Year 2013
Greenville County Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse The Phoenix Center Public Report Fiscal Year 2013 Fiscal Year 2013 Services Report July 2012 June 2013 Introduction The vision of the Greenville County
More information2014 NDSU NDCORE ALCOHOL AND DRUG SURVEY Marijuana Use Summary
2014 NDSU NDCORE ALCOHOL AND DRUG SURVEY Use Summary The NDCORE Survey was developed in conjunction with the Core Institute of Southern Illinois University to identify high-risk drinking predictors for
More informationRegional Concerns for Underage Drinking: Risks of Race & Ethnicity
Regional Concerns for Underage Drinking: Risks of Race & Ethnicity Presented by Delia Saldaña, Ph.D. University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Psychiatry June 21, 2006 Target Population SAFB
More informationAge of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes
Title: Age of Drinking Onset, Driving After Drinking, and Involvement in Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Crashes Author(s): Affiliation: Hingson, R., Heeren, T., Levenson, S., Jamanka, A., Voas, R. Boston
More information[ ASSESSING THE BURDEN OF ILLICIT DRUGS AND ALCOHOL ABUSE:] Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse. A Focus on Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse
2010 Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse Planning Contracting Monitoring [ ASSESSING THE BURDEN OF ILLICIT DRUGS AND ALCOHOL ABUSE:] A Focus on Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse 22550 Hall Road Clinton
More informationNational Institute on Drug Abuse
National Institute on Drug Abuse Community Epidemiology Work Group (CEWG) NIDA Community Epidemiology Work Group 62 nd Semi- Annual Meeting June 2007 Seattle Honolulu Jim Hall Center for the Study and
More informationMarijuana in Nevada. Arrests, Usage, and Related Data
Arrests, Usage, and Related Data Jon Gettman, Ph.D. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform www.drugscience.org November 5, 2009 1 Introduction This state report is part of a comprehensive presentation of national,
More informationMINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS
MINNESOTA COURTS: A SUMMARY OF Minnesota Courts EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE COURT PROGRAMS courts are criminal justice programs that bring together drug and alcohol treatment and the criminal justice system
More informationAlcohol Users in Treatment
October 2009 Fact Sheet Alcohol Users in Treatment The data in this fact sheet are based on admissions 1 and discharges from publicly funded alcohol and narcotic treatment services in California during
More informationOutlook and Outcomes Fiscal Year 2011
Baltimore Substance Abuse Systems, Inc. Outlook and Outcomes Fiscal Year 2011 Baltimore City Greg Warren, President Compiled July 2012 BSAS Outlook and Outcomes is the first edition of a planned annual
More informationHendry County Florida
Drug-Free Hendry County Hendry County Florida Drug and Alcohol Assessment Youth Ages 12-20 2013 Prepared by: The Health Planning Council of Southwest Florida, Inc. Table of Contents Executive Summary...
More informationThe Determination and Implication of Minimum Legal Drinking Age. MLDA, short for Minimum Legal Drinking Age, was set to twenty-one years old by
The Determination and Implication of Minimum Legal Drinking Age Introduction MLDA, short for Minimum Legal Drinking Age, was set to twenty-one years old by National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 which
More informationOffice of National Drug Control Policy
Office of National Drug Control Policy Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse State of Oklahoma Profile of Drug Indicators October 2008 ONDCP Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse staff compiled this profile
More informationALCOHOL AND DRUG TREATMENT SERVICES. Provided by the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division (ADAD) Hawaiʻi Department of Health
ALCOHOL AND DRUG TREATMENT SERVICES 2015 Provided by the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Division (ADAD) Hawaiʻi Department of Health EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report focuses on alcohol and drug treatment services
More informationEvaluation of Santa Fe s LEAD Program: Criminal Justice Outcomes
In partnership with the New Mexico Statistical Analysis Center and Pivot Evaluation Evaluation of Santa Fe s LEAD Program: Criminal Justice Outcomes Prepared by: Jenna Dole, New Mexico Statistical Analysis
More informationWomen and Substance Abuse in Nevada. A Special Report
Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada A Special Report Women and Substance Abuse in Nevada A Special Report Table of Contents Introduction 1 Statewide Demographics & Archival Data 2 Nevada Statewide Telephone
More informationMARYLAND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE: CONSEQUENCES OF ILLICIT DRUG USE, ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND SMOKING
MARYLAND EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE: CONSEQUENCES OF ILLICIT DRUG USE, ALCOHOL ABUSE, AND SMOKING Last Revised JUNE 14, 2007 Prepared by The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration and The Center for Substance
More informationExecutive Summary. The Case for Data Linkage
This first report of the San Francisco (SF) Firearm Injury Reporting System (SFFIRS) is the collaborative product of a pilot project to track and report on all violent injuries, with an initial focus on
More informationMISSION STATEMENT OBJECTIVE
Work Plan July 1, 2013 June 30, 2014 MISSION STATEMENT The DUI Task Force of Richland County represents a diverse cross-section of the community including citizens, government officials, law enforcement,
More information