Social Freedom: Life Satisfaction:

Transcription

1 A STUDY OF HUMAN RIGHT AWARENESS, INSECURITY, SOCIAL FREEDOM AND LIFE SATISFACTION AMONG THE WOMEN VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN URBAN AND RURAL AREA 1. Introduction: Domestic Violence: Since thousands of year human beings live have been affected by violence. Year after year this phenomenon becomes more serious and dangerous. It contains many kinds, and the most common one is the violence against women which needs to a radical treatment. Since this gender is the most vulnerable to violence. There are many reasons for this phenomenon. According to psychologist, lack of education, media, and nature are the main reasons which lead to this non civilized phenomenon. Psychologist believes that human beings nature could be consider as the main reason that leads to violence. They believe, because of the man s body structure is stronger than women s body structure. The violence against women is more common. They confirm that the same man, who uses verbal and physical abuse against a woman, won t use them against a man who is stronger than him. Human Rights: Human beings are rational. By virtue of being human, they possess certain basic and inalienable rights, commonly known as human rights. They became operative with their birth. Human rights, being the birth right, are therefore inherent in all human beings irrespective of their caste, carried, religion, sex and nationality. Human rights are also sometimes referred to as fundamental rights, basic rights, inherent rights, natural rights and birth rights. Human rights are a generate form, which embraces civil rights, civil liberties and social, economical and cultural rights. The idea of human rights is bound up with the idea of human dignity. Thus all those rights, which are essential for the maintenance of human dignity, are called human rights. (Mathews, S.K.,2005). Insecurity: Feelings of insecurity arise from a lack of control and confidence. When you have control of a situation, you aren t so likely to get upset. If someone is giving you a hard time, you can just utilize your power to deal with it. But if you are relying on the cooperation of others in a way that you cannot effectively enforce, it can be very frustrating. When you have a large degree of confidence in something, it is less upsetting when someone disagrees with you. Even if you do get into an argument about something 1

2 you are confident in, it probably won t make you feel too disturbed and upset. Instead, you will probably just laugh when you hear something that you confidently know to be wrong. On the other hand, when you have a belief, but you are very unsure about it, you will more easily get agitated and defensive when people challenge you on that belief. Social Freedom: For centuries women have been treated as weak, obedient, shy and timid partner of men and thereby have enjoyed an inferior status in society. Lamphere (1977) has discussed the issue of sexual equality versus female s subordination in great length. Several other studies have explored more or less similar feature of concern of the female condition in global perspective (Friedle, 1975; Kessler, 1976; Reiter, 1975). However, in recent years desire for social freedom among women has manifested itself in protest and revolt against the traditional social norms and taboos which place them in inferior roles and status and make them subservient to men. With the growth in education and vocational opportunities women throughout the world have become more conscious of their rights of equality and freedom and have revolted against the conventional norms (Phandnis and Malani, 1978). Women are taking up non traditional roles and are developing a new outlook in life. They are advocating for free love and sex. Abortion has been legalized. In developed societies there is a growing craze for test tube babies. The women lib movement has become a worldwide event. They demand equality in true sense of the term in all spheres of life. Recently propounded Androgyny theory claims that perpetuation of traditional sex roles distinctions is dysfunctional and androgynous individuals have superior adjustment Life Satisfaction: Life satisfaction is the psychological well being in general or satisfaction with life as a whole. The life satisfaction of the aged various according to once own personal characteristics and life style. The general level of life satisfaction depends on the individual s, personal and social satisfaction. - (Ruff, 1996) Life satisfaction refers to person s general happiness, freedom from tension, interest in life, etc. It is defined as the function of actual physical fitness perceived by an individual. The extent to which the needs of individuals are satisfied and their aspiration for better life is fulfilled denotes the life satisfaction of the individual. As opined by Palmore and Liukart (1972). Life satisfaction has been defined according to health status, 2

3 social variables, like income level, family satisfaction and organizational activities. It is relatively sensitive to changes in circumstances. 2. Problem of the study: Each and every research process starts with a problem, the basic element of research, while helps to transform an idea into concert research operations. In this present research the researcher has tried to study the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among the women victims of domestic violence in urban and rural area. The title of the study is as follow: A Study of Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom and Life satisfaction among the Women victims of Domestic violence in Urban and Rural area 3. Objectives of the study: The main objectives of the present research were as under 1. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction among women victims of domestic violence in urban and rural area. 2. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction among government and non-government institute related 3. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction among low and high educated women victims of domestic violence. 4. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among reserve and non-reserve categories women victims of domestic violence. 5. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among joint and nuclear families 6. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among Hindu and other religions 7. To study of the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among low, middle and high monthly income of family of women victims of domestic violence. 3

4 8. To study of the relation between the human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction of victims of domestic violence. 9. To study of the relation between human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of area, types of institute, educational level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family on life satisfaction of Predictive factors. 4. Hypothesis: The major hypotheses of the present research were as under : 1. There is no difference between the human right awareness of urban and rural areas 2. There is no difference between the human right awareness of government and non-government institute related 3. There is no difference between the human right awareness of low and high educated 4. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on human right awareness of the 5. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on human right awareness of the 6. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on human right awareness of the 7. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on human right awareness of the 8. There is no difference between the insecurity of urban and rural areas women victims of domestic violence. 9. There is no difference between the insecurity of government and non-government institute related 10. There is no difference between the insecurity of low and high educated women victims of domestic violence. 11. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on insecurity of the women victims of domestic violence. 12. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on insecurity of the 13. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on insecurity of the 4

5 14. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on insecurity of the 15. There is no difference between the social freedom of urban and rural areas 16. There is no difference between the social freedom of government and nongovernment institute related 17. There is no difference between the social freedom of low and high educated 18. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on social freedom of the 19. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on social freedom of the 20. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on social freedom of the 21. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on social freedom of the 22. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of urban and rural areas 23. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 24. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of low and high educated 25. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on life satisfaction of the 26. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on life satisfaction of the 27. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on life satisfaction of the 28. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on life satisfaction of the 29. There is no difference between the health satisfaction of urban and rural areas 30. There is no difference between the health satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 5

6 31. There is no difference between the health satisfaction of low and high educated 32. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on health satisfaction of the 33. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on health satisfaction of the 34. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on health satisfaction of the 35. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on health satisfaction of the 36. There is no difference between the personal satisfaction of urban and rural areas 37. There is no difference between the personal satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 38. There is no difference between the personal satisfaction of low and high educated 39. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on personal satisfaction of the 40. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on personal satisfaction of the 41. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on personal satisfaction of the 42. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on personal satisfaction of the 43. There is no difference between the economical satisfaction of urban and rural areas 44. There is no difference between the economical satisfaction of government and non-government institute related 45. There is no difference between the economical satisfaction of low and high educated 46. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on economical satisfaction of the 47. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on economical satisfaction of the 6

7 48. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on economical satisfaction of the 49. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on economical satisfaction of the 50. There is no difference between the marital satisfaction of urban and rural areas 51. There is no difference between the marital satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 52. There is no difference between the marital satisfaction of low and high educated 53. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on marital satisfaction of the 54. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on marital satisfaction of the 55. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on marital satisfaction of the 56. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on marital satisfaction of the 57. There is no difference between the social satisfaction of urban and rural areas 58. There is no difference between the social satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 59. There is no difference between the social satisfaction of low and high educated 60. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on social satisfaction of the 61. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on social satisfaction of the 62. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on social satisfaction of the 63. There is no interaction effect of the area, institutes and education level on social satisfaction of the 64. There is no difference between the job satisfaction of urban and rural areas 7

8 65. There is no difference between the job satisfaction of government and nongovernment institute related 66. There is no difference between the job satisfaction of low and high educated 67. There is no interaction effect of the area and institutes on job satisfaction of the 68. There is no interaction effect of the area and education level on job satisfaction of the 69. There is no interaction effect of the institute and education level on job satisfaction of the 70. There is no interaction effect of the area institutes and education level on job satisfaction of the 71. There is no difference between the human right awareness of reserve and nonreserve categories 72. There is no difference between the insecurity of reserve and non-reserve categories 73. There is no difference between the social freedom of reserve and non-reserve categories 74. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of reserve and non-reserve categories 75. There is no difference between the human right awareness of joint and nuclear families 76. There is no difference between the insecurity of joint and nuclear families women victims of domestic violence. 77. There is no difference between the social freedom of joint and nuclear families 78. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of joint and nuclear families 79. There is no difference between the human right awareness of Hindu and other religion 80. There is no difference between the insecurity of Hindu and other religion women victims of domestic violence. 81. There is no difference between the social freedom of Hindu and other religion 8

9 82. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of Hindu and other religion 83. There is no difference between the human right awareness of low and middle monthly income of family of 84. There is no difference between the human right awareness of low and high monthly income of family of 85. There is no difference between the human right awareness of middle and high monthly income of family of 86. There is no difference between the insecurity of low and middle monthly income of family of 87. There is no difference between the insecurity of low and high total monthly income of family of 88. There is no difference between the insecurity of middle and high monthly income of family of 89. There is no difference between the social freedom of low and middle monthly income of family of 90. There is no difference between the social freedom of low and high monthly income of family of 91. There is no difference between the social freedom of middle and high monthly income of family of 92. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of low and middle monthly income of family of 93. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of low and high monthly income of family of 94. There is no difference between the life satisfaction of middle and high monthly income of family of 95. There is no relation between the human right awareness and insecurity of the 96. There is no relation between the human right awareness and social freedom of the 97. There is no relation between the human right awareness and life satisfaction of the 98. There is no relation between the insecurity and social freedom of the women victims of domestic violence. 9

10 99. There is no relation between the insecurity and life satisfaction of the women victims of domestic violence There is no relation between the social freedom and life satisfaction of the women victims of domestic violence There is no predictor relation of human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of area, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family of women victims of domestic violence with their Life satisfaction There is no predictor relation of human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family of urban areas women victims of domestic violence with their Life satisfaction There is no predictor relation of human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family of rural areas women victims of domestic violence with their Life satisfaction. 5. Research Variables: (A) Independent Variables: 1) Types of area: Urban / Rural 2) Types of institutes: Government / Non-government 3) Education level: Low / High 4) Social status: Reserve / Non reserve 5) Types of family: Joint / Nuclear 6) Religion: Hindu / Other religion 7) Monthly income of family: Low (low than 10,000) / Middle (10,000 to 20,000) / High (more than 20,000) Predictor factors: 1) Human right awareness 2) Insecurity 3) Social freedom 4) Types of area 5) Types of institutes 6) Education level 10

11 7) Social status 8) Types of family 9) Religion 10) Monthly income of family (B) Dependent variables: 1) Human right awareness 2) Insecurity 3) Social freedom 4) Life satisfaction and Factor of Life satisfaction (C) Controlled variables: 1) Only those women who tortured physically, mentally or domestic violence was taken in this study. 2) Only present study related government and non-government institutes were included. All institutes were not included in this study. 3) Only areas of North and Central Gujarat considered in this study. 4) Mentally retired women were not taken as a sample for this study. 5) Widow women were not including in this study. 6) All those variables and other environmental effects which create negative effects on this research was control or remove from this research as possible. 6. Research Design : The main purpose of this study is to get information about the urban and rural areas women victims of domestic violence s human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction also other importance variables like, types of area, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family. The whole procedure of this research was divided into two sections. Section- 1 In this research 2x2x2 factorial design was used for to study, variables like Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom, Life satisfaction and Factor of life satisfaction of urban and rural areas women victims of domestic violence reference of institutes and education level do they contained difference in which matter or not? It was decided to take sample in equal number generated from this research method in 11

12 eight groups above three independent variables under this research method of main and interactive. This research was adopted 2x2x2 factorial design with 2 types of areas (urban and rural), 2 types of institutes (government and non government) and 2 types of education level (low and high). Urban (A1) 2x2x2 N=360 Rural (A2) Variables Low Education(C1) High Education(C2) Government Institute (B1) Non government Institute (B2) Government Institute (B1) Non government Institute (B2) Section-2: t test was used for to get information about human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction with reference to social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family in this section. In this study r karl-pearson s method was used for to get information about human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction to know do they have only relation between them or not. Multiple regression analysis was used to know about Life satisfaction and predictor relation by human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of area, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of 7. Sample: The aim and object of this research is to study of human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction among women victims of domestic violence. For these purpose areas of North and Central Gujarat was selected. For this 12

13 research 360 victim women of domestic violence would be selected as a sample from selected government and non-government institutes of urban and rural areas of North Gujarat and Central Gujarat by random system. Out of which 180 would be urban areas women and 180 rural areas women. Out of which 90 would be government institutes related women and 90 would be non government institutes related women. From each of these 90 women 45 low and 45 high educated women would be taken as a sample. 8. Tools: For the present investigation following tools were used: Personal datasheet prepared to get personal information. 1) Human right awareness scale: Human right awareness scale developed by Vishal Sood and Arti Anand, (2012). 2) Insecurity scale: Indian Adaption of Maslow s security insecurity feeling inventory constructed and standardized by Tasneem Naqvi,(1989). 3) Social freedom scale: Social freedom scale developed by L. I. Bhusan (1987). 4) Life satisfaction scale: Life satisfaction scale developed by Q. G. Alam and R. Srivastava (1996). 9. Research Procedure: The aim and object of present study is to get information regarding human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction of urban and rural areas First, the list of government and non-government institutes of Gujarat were collected from website of Gujarat government and other NGOs listed website. Then, the institutes of North Gujarat and Central Gujarat considered urban and rural areas were selected from those lists. Than discuss about the research objectives with each institutes and got permission to fill the questionnaire. After that the lists and personal information of the women victims of domestic violence related to particular institutes were collected. Slips were prepared according to Types of area, types of institutes and education level. Among these slips, required number of women was selected randomly. Information was received by giving and my filling from them according to urban and rural areas, government institute and non-government institute, low and high education from the women whose slips were randomly selected. By this way, information was collected from total 360 urban and rural women victims of 13

14 domestic violence. Out of which 180 would be urban areas women and 180 rural areas women. Out of which 90 would be government institutes related women and 90 would be non-government institute s related women. From each of these 90 women 45 low and 45 high educated women would be taken as a sample. After constitute the sample Human right awareness scale, Insecurity scale, Social freedom scale and Life satisfaction scale were administered on the selected sample. To avoid the fatigue and warm up effect all test were taken separately. All the instruction were strictly followed as per describe in manual of the correspondence test. Later on, the responses of the subjects on the each test was scored as per scoring procedure describe in the particular test and their scores on Human right awareness scale, Insecurity scale, Social freedom scale and Life satisfaction scale (dependent variable) were obtained. These score were further statistically analyzed under four techniques F test, t test, correlation and Multiple regression to study the Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom, Life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction among women victims of domestic violence of urban and rural area and to find relation between them. 10. Statistical Analysis : Following statistical analysis was used for analyzing the data. ANOVA was used to get information about human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction with reference to types of area, types of institute and education level in this section. t test was used for to get information about social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family and other dependent variables. r karl-pearson s correlation method was used to know relation between human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom and life satisfaction to know do they have only relation between them or not. Multiple regression analysis was used to know about Life satisfaction and predictor relation by human right awareness, insecurity, social freedom, types of area, types of institute, education level, social status, types of family, religion and monthly income of family of 11. Summary of the results: 14

15 Table No. 1 Summary result of F value of Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom, Life satisfaction and factor of life satisfaction with reference to Types of area, Types of institute and Education level of Women victims of domestic violence. (N=360) Source Human right awareness Insecurity Social freedom Life satisfaction Health satisfaction Personal satisfaction Economical satisfaction Marital satisfaction Social satisfaction Job satisfaction A (Types of Area) 50.10** 75.29** 20.65** 18.69** 4.58* 0.09 NS 4.58* 5.93* 15.35** 5.10* B (Types of Institute) 18.68** 37.51** 16.78** 12.85** 6.84** 20.13** 4.82* 3.65 NS 65.87** 69.17** C (Education level) 1.14 NS 0.28 NS 4.20* 13.40** 2.55 NS 0.02 NS 0.77 NS 0.08 NS 12.67** 16.53** AxB 0.13 NS 50.59** 0.80 NS 0.53 NS 0.14 NS 2.18 NS 5.07* 4.95* 0.15 NS 6.37* AxC 1.53 NS 11.47** 0.11 NS 16.32** 6.84 NS 0.21 NS 0.24 NS 3.65 NS 11.95** 9.02* BxC 11.97** 7.78* 2.57 NS 0.14 NS 3.49 NS 0.16 NS 5.38* 1.27 NS 0.05 NS 0.06 NS AxBxC 10.99** 1.08 NS 5.16* 6.38* 0.26 NS 2.03 NS 0.03 NS 1.27 NS 4.74* 21.62** **P>0.01, *P>0.05, NS= Not Significant 15

16 Table No. 2 Summary results of t value of Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom and Life satisfaction with reference to Social status, Types of family, Religion and Total monthly income of family of women victims of domestic violence (N=360) t value Name of variable Human right awareness Insecurity Social freedom Life satisfaction Social Status (Reserve /Non-reserve) 0.23 NS 1.11 NS 0.17 NS 1.69 NS Types of family (Joint / Nuclear) 1.72 NS 0.07 NS 1.18 NS 1.00 NS Religion (Hindu / Other) 0.70 NS 0.02 NS 0.13 NS 0.48 NS Total monthly income of family Low Middle Low High Middle High 1.72 NS 0.50 NS 0.32 NS 0.28 NS 0.64 NS 1.23 NS 0.55 NS 0.37 NS 0.10 NS 0.78 NS 0.84 NS 0.66 NS NS= Not Significant Table No. 3 Summary results of correlation between Human right awareness, Insecurity, Social freedom and Life satisfaction. (N=360) Name of variable Correlation Human right awareness and Insecurity -0.10* Human right awareness and Social NS freedom Human right awareness and Life 0.12** satisfaction Insecurity and Social freedom NS Insecurity and Life satisfaction NS Social freedom and Life satisfaction 0.16** **P>0.01, *P>0.05, NS= Not Significant 16

17 Table No. 4 Summary results of Regression Correlation between Predictor factor of Life satisfaction on All Women victims of domestic violence, Urban areas women victims of domestic violence and Rural areas women victims of domestic violence. (N=360) Name of variable Human right awareness All Women victims of domestic violence Percentage value t value Urban areas women victims of domestic violence Percentage value t value Rural areas women victims of domestic violence Percentage t value value 9.79% 1.93 NS 1.60% 0.15 NS 16.09% 2.49* Insecurity 9.24% 1.75 NS 12.66% 1.15 NS 15.15% 2.10* Social freedom Types of area Types of institute Education level Social status Types of family 5.78% 1.18 NS 1.31% 0.12 NS 10.50% 1.72 NS 18.47% 3.36** % 3.86** 33.04% 2.92** 21.17% 2.90** 15.86% 3.39** 3.49% 0.32 NS 30.55% 5.10** 9.05% 1.94 NS 27.66% 2.55* 0.52% 0.09 NS 5.69% 1.22 NS 10.19% 0.96 NS 3.36% 0.56 NS Religion 3.17% 0.69 NS 3.93% 0.36 NS 3.27% 0.55 NS Total monthly income of family 3.36% 0.73 NS 6.11% 0.56 NS 0.17% 0.02 NS **P>0.01, *P>0.05, NS= Not Significant 17

18 12. Conclusion: Following are the main results of the present research. 1. There is significant difference between the human right awareness of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high human right awareness than the rural areas woman. 2. There is significant difference between the human right awareness of government and non-government institute related The non-government institute related women possess more human right awareness than the government institute related women. 3. There is no significant difference between the human right awareness of low and high educated 4. There is no significant interaction effect of the area and institutes on human right awareness of the 5. There is no significant interaction effect of the area and education level on human right awareness of the 6. There is significant interaction effect of institute and education level on human right awareness of the 7. There is significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on human right awareness of the 8. There is significant difference between the insecurity of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high insecurity than the rural areas woman. 9. There is significant difference between the insecurity of government and nongovernment institute related The government institute related women possess more insecurity than the nongovernment institute related women. 10. There is no significant difference between the insecurity of low and high educated 11. There is significant interaction effect of area and institute on insecurity of women victims of domestic violence. 12. There is significant interaction effect of area and education level on insecurity of 13. There is significant interaction effect of institute and education level on insecurity of 18

19 14. There is no significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on insecurity of 15. There is significant difference between the social freedom of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high social freedom than the rural areas woman. 16. There is significant difference between the social freedom of government and non-government institute related The government institute related women possess more social freedom than the nongovernment institute related women. 17. There is significant difference between the social freedom of low and high educated The high educated women possess high social freedom than the low educated woman. 18. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and institute on social freedom of 19. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and education level on social freedom of 20. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on social freedom of 21. There is significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on social freedom of 22. There is significant difference between the life satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high life satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 23. There is significant difference between the life satisfaction of government and non-government institute related The government institute related women possess more life satisfaction than the nongovernment institute related women. 24. There is significant difference between the life satisfaction of low and high educated The low educated women possess high life satisfaction than the high educated woman. 25. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and institute on life satisfaction of 26. There is significant interaction effect of area and education level on life satisfaction of 19

20 27. There is no significant interaction effect of institute and education level on life satisfaction of 28. There is significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on life satisfaction of 29. There is significant difference between the health satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high health satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 30. There is significant difference between the health satisfaction of government and non-government institute related The nongovernment institute related women possess more health satisfaction than the government institute related women. 31. There is no significant difference between the health satisfaction of low and high educated 32. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and institute on health satisfaction of 33. There is significant interaction effect of area and education level on health satisfaction of 34. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on health satisfaction of 35. There is no significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on health satisfaction of 36. There is no significant difference between the personal satisfaction of urban and rural areas 37. There is significant difference between the personal satisfaction of government and non-government institute related The non-government institute related women possess more personal satisfaction than the government institute related women. 38. There is no significant difference between the personal satisfaction of low and high educated 39. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and institute on personal satisfaction of 40. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and education level on personal satisfaction of 20

21 41. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on personal satisfaction of 42. There is no significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on personal satisfaction of 43. There is significant difference between the economical satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high economical satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 44. There is significant difference between the economical satisfaction of government and non-government institute related women victims of domestic violence. The non-government institute related women possess more economical satisfaction than the government institute related women. 45. There is no significant difference between the economical satisfaction of low and high educated 46. There is significant interaction effect of area and institute on economical satisfaction of 47. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and education level on economical satisfaction of 48. There is significant interaction effect of institute and education level on economical satisfaction of 49. There is no any significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on economical satisfaction of 50. There is significant difference between the marital satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high marital satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 51. There is no significant difference between the marital satisfaction of government and non-government institute related 52. There is no significant difference between the marital satisfaction of low and high educated 53. There is significant interaction effect of area and institute on marital satisfaction of 54. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and education level on marital satisfaction of 55. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on marital satisfaction of 21

22 56. There is no any significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on marital satisfaction of 57. There is significant difference between the social satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high social satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 58. There is significant difference between the social satisfaction of government and non-government institute related The government institute related women possess more social satisfaction than the non-government institute related women. 59. There is significant difference between the social satisfaction of low and high educated The low educated women possess high social satisfaction than the high educated woman. 60. There is no any significant interaction effect of area and institute on social satisfaction of 61. There is significant interaction effect of area and education level on social satisfaction of 62. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on social satisfaction of 63. There is significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on social satisfaction of 64. There is significant difference between the job satisfaction of urban and rural areas The urban areas women possess high job satisfaction than the rural areas woman. 65. There is significant difference between the job satisfaction of government and non-government institute related The government institute related women possess more job satisfaction than the nongovernment institute related women. 66. There is significant difference between the job satisfaction of low and high educated The low educated women possess high job satisfaction than the high educated woman. 67. There is significant interaction effect of area and institute on job satisfaction of 68. There is significant interaction effect of area and education level on job satisfaction of 22

23 69. There is no any significant interaction effect of institute and education level on job satisfaction of 70. There is significant interaction effect of area, institute and education level on job satisfaction of 71. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of reserve and non-reserve categories 72. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of reserve and nonreserve categories 73. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of reserve and nonreserve categories 74. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of reserve and non-reserve categories 75. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of joint and nuclear families 76. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of joint and nuclear families 77. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of joint and nuclear families 78. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of joint and nuclear families 79. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of Hindu and other religion 80. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of Hindu and other religion 81. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of Hindu and other religion 82. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of Hindu and other religion 83. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of low and middle monthly income of family of 84. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of low and high monthly income of family of 85. There is no significant difference between the Human right awareness of middle and high monthly income of family of 23

24 86. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of low and middle monthly income of family of 87. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of low and high total monthly income of family of 88. There is no significant difference between the Insecurity of middle and high monthly income of family of 89. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of low and middle monthly income of family of 90. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of low and high monthly income of family of 91. There is no significant difference between the Social freedom of middle and high monthly income of family of 92. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of low and middle monthly income of family of 93. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of low and high monthly income of family of 94. There is no significant difference between the Life satisfaction of middle and high monthly income of family of 95. There is significant negative correlation between the human right awareness and insecurity of 96. There is no significant correlation between the human right awareness and social freedom of 97. There is significant positive correlation between the human right awareness and life satisfaction of 98. There is no significant correlation between the insecurity and social freedom of 99. There is no significant correlation between the insecurity and life satisfaction of 100. There is significant positive correlation between the social freedom and life satisfaction of 101. There is significant predictor relation of Types of area, Types of institute and Education level of women victims of domestic violence with their overall Life satisfaction. 24

25 102. There is significant predictor relation of types of institute and social status of urban areas women victims of domestic violence with their overall Life satisfaction There is significant predictor relation of human right awareness, insecurity, types of institute and education level of rural areas women victims of domestic violence with their overall Life satisfaction. Reference : Alam, Q. G. and Shrivastava, R. (1996). Life satisfaction scale construction and standardization. National psychological corporation, Agra. Bhushan, L. I., (1987). The manual of social freedom scale. National psychological corporation, Agra. Broota, K. D., (1992), Experimental design in Behavioral research- well western limited. Karlinger F. N. Research Methods in the Behavioral Science. Freidl, E., (1975). Women and Men: An Anthropologist's View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Kessler, E.S., (1976). Women: An Anthropological View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Lamphere, L., (1977) "Anthropology", Signs 2(3): (Review article) Mathews, S.K., (2005). Human rights in India: with special reference to the role of the Kerala state human right commission. A published Ph.D. thesis, Mahatma Gandhi University, kottayam, Kerala, India. Naqvi, T., (1989). The manual of Security Insecurity feeling inventory, National psychological corporation, Agra. Phadnis, U. and Malani, I., (1978) Women of the World Illusion and Reality, Vikas Publishing House Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi. Reiter, R. R., (1975). Toward an Anthropology of Women. Rayna R. Reiter, ed. New York: Monthly Review Press. Sood, V. and Anand, A., (2012). The manual of human right awareness scale. National psychological corporation, Agra. 25