Integrated network analysis reveals distinct regulatory roles of transcription factors and micrornas

Similar documents
Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks

Supplementary. properties of. network types. randomly sampled. subsets (75%

Gene-microRNA network module analysis for ovarian cancer

RNA-seq Introduction

Lentiviral Delivery of Combinatorial mirna Expression Constructs Provides Efficient Target Gene Repression.

Supplementary Figure S1. Gene expression analysis of epidermal marker genes and TP63.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb Supplementary Figure 1. Differential expression of mirnas from the pri-mir-17-92a locus.

Supplementary Figures

Table S1. Relative abundance of AGO1/4 proteins in different organs. Table S2. Summary of smrna datasets from various samples.

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1

User Guide. Association analysis. Input

Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) Pasieka, Science Photo Library

Supplementary Figure 1: Features of IGLL5 Mutations in CLL: a) Representative IGV screenshot of first

Vessel wall differences between middle cerebral artery and basilar artery. plaques on magnetic resonance imaging

7SK ChIRP-seq is specifically RNA dependent and conserved between mice and humans.

Supplemental Information. Genomic Characterization of Murine. Monocytes Reveals C/EBPb Transcription. Factor Dependence of Ly6C Cells

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Behavioral training.

Statistical questions for statistical methods

Expanded View Figures

microrna-200b and microrna-200c promote colorectal cancer cell proliferation via

STAT1 regulates microrna transcription in interferon γ stimulated HeLa cells

fl/+ KRas;Atg5 fl/+ KRas;Atg5 fl/fl KRas;Atg5 fl/fl KRas;Atg5 Supplementary Figure 1. Gene set enrichment analyses. (a) (b)

Prokaryotes and eukaryotes alter gene expression in response to their changing environment

Prediction of micrornas and their targets

Supplementary information for: Human micrornas co-silence in well-separated groups and have different essentialities

Supplemental Information. Genetic Regulation of Plasma Lipid Species. and Their Association with Metabolic Phenotypes

Bmi-1 regulates stem cell-like properties of gastric cancer cells via modulating mirnas

ONLINE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Transcriptome profiling of the developing male germ line identifies the mir-29 family as a global regulator during meiosis

microrna-guided diagnostics for neuroendocrine tumors

Nature Structural & Molecular Biology: doi: /nsmb.2419

GENETIC LINKAGE ANALYSIS

Broad H3K4me3 is associated with increased transcription elongation and enhancer activity at tumor suppressor genes

genomics for systems biology / ISB2020 RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)

RNA- seq Introduc1on. Promises and pi7alls

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. SEER data for male and female cancer incidence from

High AU content: a signature of upregulated mirna in cardiac diseases

Mature microrna identification via the use of a Naive Bayes classifier

The Biology and Genetics of Cells and Organisms The Biology of Cancer

Chapter 2. Investigation into mir-346 Regulation of the nachr α5 Subunit

Nature Neuroscience: doi: /nn Supplementary Figure 1. Overlap between default mode network (DMN) and movie/recall maps.

PBZ FT01_PBZ FT01_TZ FT01_NZ. interface zone (I) tumor zone (TZ) necrotic zone (NZ)

Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of prostate cancer. Gennadi V. Glinsky, Anna B. Glinskii, Andrew J. Stephenson, Robert M.

Bi 8 Lecture 17. interference. Ellen Rothenberg 1 March 2016

m 6 A mrna methylation regulates AKT activity to promote the proliferation and tumorigenicity of endometrial cancer

Statistical Assessment of the Global Regulatory Role of Histone. Acetylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (Support Information)

Paternal exposure and effects on microrna and mrna expression in developing embryo. Department of Chemical and Radiation Nur Duale

Nov versus Fam. Fam 1 versus. Fam 2. Supplementary figure 1

Global Analyses of the Effect of Different Cellular Contexts on MicroRNA Targeting

Nature Immunology: doi: /ni Supplementary Figure 1. Transcriptional program of the TE and MP CD8 + T cell subsets.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Material

MBios 478: Systems Biology and Bayesian Networks, 27 [Dr. Wyrick] Slide #1. Lecture 27: Systems Biology and Bayesian Networks

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

(A) Cells grown in monolayer were fixed and stained for surfactant protein-c (SPC,

Nature Genetics: doi: /ng Supplementary Figure 1. Mutational signatures in BCC compared to melanoma.

period. The distribution of PREs and TCs, stratified by synoptic category

Correspondence: mirna regulation of Sdf1 chemokine signaling provides genetic robustness to germ cell migration

RASA: Robust Alternative Splicing Analysis for Human Transcriptome Arrays

HALLA KABAT * Outreach Program, mircore, 2929 Plymouth Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA LEO TUNKLE *

Extensive cerna cerna interaction networks mediated by mirnas regulate development in multiple rhesus tissues

Supplementary Figure 1) GABAergic enhancement by leptin hyperpolarizes POMC neurons A) Representative recording samples showing the membrane

Breast cancer. Risk factors you cannot change include: Treatment Plan Selection. Inferring Transcriptional Module from Breast Cancer Profile Data

Supplementary Figure 1

STATISTICS IN CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH

Santulli G. et al. A microrna-based strategy to suppress restenosis while preserving endothelial function

The Characterization of microrna-mediated Gene Regulation as Impacted by Both Target Site Location and Seed Match Type

Supplementary Figure 1

of TERT, MLL4, CCNE1, SENP5, and ROCK1 on tumor development were discussed.

Supplementary Figures

VL Network Analysis ( ) SS2016 Week 3

Supplementary Information. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a. transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells

Package TargetScoreData

Polycomb protein Ezh2 regulates pancreatic β-cell Ink4a/Arf expression and regeneration in streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus

Supplementary Figure 1. Efficiency of Mll4 deletion and its effect on T cell populations in the periphery. Nature Immunology: doi: /ni.

ankylosing spondylitis Department of Clinical Immunology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military

Figure S1A. Blood glucose levels in mice after glucose injection

Supplementary Information

Peak-calling for ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq

Supplementary information for: Community detection for networks with. unipartite and bipartite structure. Chang Chang 1, 2, Chao Tang 2

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Figure 1: TSLP receptor skin expression in dcssc. A: Healthy control (HC) skin with TSLP receptor expression in brown (10x

Supplementary Figure 1: Digitoxin induces apoptosis in primary human melanoma cells but not in normal melanocytes, which express lower levels of the

Supplementary Figure 1: Experimental design. DISCOVERY PHASE VALIDATION PHASE (N = 88) (N = 20) Healthy = 20. Healthy = 6. Endometriosis = 33

PepT1 Expression Helps Maintain Intestinal Homeostasis by Mediating the Differential. Expression of mirnas along the Crypt-Villus Axis

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supplementary Online Content

Data Analysis with SPSS

Supplementary Figures

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS

Bystander cells enhance NK cytotoxic efficiency by reducing search time

Supplementary Materials for

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

MicroRNA roles in signaling during lactation: an insight from differential expression, time course and pathway analyses of deep sequence data

Ubiquitously transcribed genes use alternative polyadenylation to achieve tissue-specific expression

Supplementary Figure 1

Measuring DNA Methylation with the MinION. Winston Timp Department of Biomedical Engineering Johns Hopkins University 12/1/16

Discovery of Novel Human Gene Regulatory Modules from Gene Co-expression and

From reference genes to global mean normalization

Transcription:

Integrated network analysis reveals distinct regulatory roles of transcription factors and micrornas Yu Guo 1,2,4, Katherine Alexander 1, Andrew G Clark 1, Andrew Grimson 1 and Haiyuan Yu 2,3* 1 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 2 Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, 3 Department of Biological Statistics and Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. 4 Present address: Computational and Systems Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, 60 Biopolis Street, #02-01 Genome, Singapore 138762, Singapore *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: haiyuan.yu@cornell.edu

SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURE LEGENDS Supplementary Figure 1 Synergistic effect of TF and mirna regulation on the protein interactions of their targets. Average pairwise distance of protein products of gene targets regulated by multiple TFs (A) or mirnas (B) in the protein-protein interaction network. Difference in the average pairwise distances between the first and last bins is calculated by the t-test. Supplementary Figure 2 Analysis of the synergistic effects of mirnas on target genes using experimentally verified mirna targets. (A) LOD values for enrichment of mrna co-expression between gene pairs jointly regulated by multiple mirnas. (B) LOD values for enrichment of protein co-expression between gene pairs jointly regulated by multiple mirnas. (C) LOD values for enrichment of protein-protein interactions between gene pairs jointly regulated by mirnas (D) LOD values for the likelihood of gene pairs jointly regulated by multiple mirnas to be associated with the same disease. *P < 0.05. P-values are calculated by the Z-test. Difference between the first and last bins of each panel is calculated by the chi-squared test. Supplementary Figure 3 Co-regulation of gene targets by inter-regulating TFs and mirnas. (A) Percentage of mirnas that share targets with TFs that regulate them. (B) Percentage of TFs that share targets with mirnas that regulate them. Error bars indicate ±SE. Supplementary Figure 4 Inter-regulation of TFs and mirnas. Distribution of the fraction of co-expressed targets of (A) TF pairs regulated by the same mirna, (B) TF pairs regulated by the same TF, and (C) mirna pairs regulated by the same TF. Supplementary Figure 5 Inter-regulation of TFs and mirnas. Distribution of the fraction of interacting targets of (A) TF pairs regulated by the same mirna, (B) TF pairs regulated by the same TF, and (C) mirna pairs regulated by the same TF. Supplementary Figure 6 Inter-regulation of TFs and mirnas. Distribution of the similarity scores of (A) TF pairs regulated by the same mirna, (B) TF pairs regulated by the same TF, and (C) mirna pairs regulated by the same TF.

A B average pairwise distance 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4 average pairwise distance of TF targets average pairwise distance of mirna targets P < 10 4.6-20 P < 10-20 >=0 >=1 >=2 >=3 >=4 >=5 number of common regulators average pairwise distance 4.4 4.2 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 >=0 >=1 >=2 >=3 >=4 >=5 number of common regulators Supplementary Figure 1

A Enrichment of mrna co-expression B Enrichment of protein co-expression 1.5 1.5 Log odds ratio 1 0.5 0 Log odds ratio 1 0.5 0-0.5 >=1 >=2 >=3 Number of common regulators -0.5 >=1 >=2 >=3 >=4 Number of common regulators C Log odds ratio P < 10-5 Enrichment of protein-protein interactions D Enrichment of target gene pairs causing the same disease 2 * 2 1.5 1.5 P = 0.0057 1 * 1 * 0.5 0.5 0 0-0.5-0.5 >=1 >=2 >=3 >=1 >=2 Number of common regulators Number of common regulators Log odds ratio Supplementary Figure 2

A B Percentage of TF-miRNA pairs that share targets 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% regulating TF P < 0.0001 P <0.0001 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Percentage of mirna-tf pairs that share targets regulating mirna Supplementary Figure 3

A B C TFs regulated by the same mirna TFs regulated by the same TF mirnas regulated by the same TF Fraction of targets that coexpress 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 P = 0.038 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 P = 0.010 shared mirna shared TF shared TF Supplementary Figure 4

A B C TFs regulated by the same mirna TFs regulated by the same TF mirnas regulated by the same TF Fraction of targets that phyiscally interact 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 P < 10-4 P = 0.001 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 shared mirna shared TF shared TF Supplementary Figure 5

A B C TFs regulated by the same mirna TFs regulated by the same TF mirnas regulated by the same TF Similarity Score 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 P < 10-12 P < 10-15 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 shared mirna shared TF shared TF Supplementary Figure 6