Single Voxel MR Spectroscopy in Non-Herniated Painful, Herniated Painful, and Non-Painful Lumbar Discs

Similar documents
ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study

ProDisc-L Total Disc Replacement. IDE Clinical Study.

Lumbar total disc replacement

PRP and Stem cells Injection : Its applications in discopathy

Common Thoraco- Lumbar Problems in the Mature Athlete

End Plate Heat Injury after Percutaneous Laser Disc Decompression (PLDD) in the Lumbar Spine: MR imaging and Pathological Correlation

Comprehension of the common spine disorder.

5/19/2017. Disclosures. Introduction. How Much Kyphosis is Allowable for Cervical Total Disc Replacement? And Other Considerations

Introduction. Castellvi Spine Current FDA Trials: Disc Regeneration DISCLOSURE 5/27/2016

DynaWell L-Spine Compression Device

Axial Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion. Description

Table of Contents: Part 1 General principles. Section 1: Introduction. 1. Past, present and future of interventional physiatry 2.

Innovative Spine Care Technology

Principle. 1 Diskit II Technique Manual

Interlaminar Decompression & Stabilization. Reginald Davis, M.D., FAANS, FACS Director of Clinical Research

The Athlete s Lumbar Spine: Current Concepts

Clinical Review Criteria Discography (Discogram) for Low Back Pain

2016 OPAM Mid-Year Educational Conference, sponsored by AOCOPM Thursday, March 10, 2016 C-1

NASS Diagnosis and Treatment of Low-Back Pain Guideline Draft Clinical Question Protocol

GET BACK TO YOUR FUTURE WITH SPECIALIZED SPINE CARE. A Guide for Patients

Regenerative Treatment of Spinal Conditions

Facet Joint Arthrosis Disc Degeneration and Lumbago. Dr.Ruchira Sethi Dr. Vishram Singh Department of Anatomy Santosh University, India

MESOBLAST S PHASE 2 TRIAL RESULTS IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PRESENTED AT NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY ANNUAL MEETING

Objectives. Comprehension of the common spine disorder

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy (IDET) Compared with Circumferential Lumbar Fusion

10/8/2015. Consultant for Boston Scientific-no conflicts with this presentation

AGING SPINE. Prof. dr Mirza Bišćević. Spine department, Orthopedics

Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission

The ABC s of LUMBAR SPINE DISEASE

Patient Selection and Lumbar Operative Interventions

Dingjun Hao, Baorong He, Liang Yan. Hong Hui Hospital, Xi an Jiaotong University College. of Medicine, Xi an, Shaanxi , China

A Phase III Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study of Condoliase for Treatment of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation

Nerve Ingrowth Into Diseased Intervertebral Disc in Chronic Back Pain. The Lancet July 19, 1997, Vol. 350, pp

Clinical Reference Guide

LUMBAR SPINE CASE 3. Property of VOMPTI, LLC. For Use of Participants Only. No Use or Reproduction Without Consent 1. L4-5, 5-S1 disc, facet (somatic)

A.J. Lievre, PT, DPT, OCS, CMPT Aaron Hartstein, PT, DPT, OCS, FAAOMPT

Signal intensity changes of the posterior elements of the lumbar spine in symptomatic adults

2013 UCSF SPINE SYMPOSIUM RICHARD DEYO, MD MPH MICHAEL GROFF, MD

Sacroiliitis. Devin Peck, M.D. Associate Program Director Tri-Institute Pain Fellowship Weill Cornell Medical Center

2/5/2019. Facet Joint Pain. Biomechanics

Musculoskeletal Examination of the Pain Patient

High Field MR of the Spine

Hidayatullah Hamidi. MD Consultant Radiologist. Lumbar Spine MR Imaging Interpretation

Cervical Plasma disc decompression (Nucleoplasty): Indications Results and Limits. Alessandro Cesaroni

Francine M. Pulver, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Ohio State University Medical Center

5/19/2017. Interspinous Process Fixation with the Minuteman G3. What is the Minuteman G3. How Does it Work?

Coflex TM for Lumbar Stenosis with

A minimally invasive surgical approach reduces cranial adjacent segment degeneration in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion

spine- related Groin pain

Diskit ll Technique Manual. Principle

1/28/2015. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Learning Objectives. Faculty/ Presenter Disclosures. Neurogenic Claudication and. Faculty: Dr.

Pathophysiology of lumbar disc degeneration: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 13 (2): August, 2002

Corporate Medical Policy

University of Jordan. Professor Freih Abuhassan -

Axial lumbosacral interbody fusion (axial LIF) is considered investigational.

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF INCIDENTAL DURAL TEARS IN MICROENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DECOMPRESSION SURGERY: INCIDENCE AND OUTCOMES

Introduction. Castellvi Spine Are We Closer to Finding the True Lumbar Pain Generator? DISCLOSURE 5/27/2016. Dom Coric, M.D.

Discussion Points 10/17/16. Spine Pain is Ubiquitous. Interventional Pain Management

EPIDURAL STEROID AND FACET INJECTIONS FOR SPINAL PAIN

Original Policy Date

Low Back Pain: Review of Anatomy and Pathophysiology

ASJ. Outcome of Salvage Lumbar Fusion after Lumbar Arthroplasty. Asian Spine Journal. Introduction. Hussein Alahmadi, Harel Deutsch

DISCOGRAPHY DISC. North American Spine Society Public Education Series

Artificial intervertebral disc

Copyright 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

Degenerative Disease of the Spine

Lumbar Facet Joint Replacement

MOTORIZED SPINAL TRACTION

Corey J. Wallach, MD The Anderson Orthopaedic Clinic 2445 Army Navy Drive Arlington, VA

Clinical Study. Overview

Low Back Pain J o h n G i l l i c k, M D UCSD Clinical Professor Internal Medicine and Anesthesiology, non-salaried

Spectrum of magnetic resonance imaging findings in chronic low back pain

CURRICULUM VITAE. James P. Devney, D.O.

Interspinous Fusion Devices. Midterm results. ROME SPINE 2012, 7th International Meeting Rome, 6-7 December 2012

Clinical Policy Title: Discography

Cox Technic Case Report #169 published at (sent 5/9/17) 1

LOW BACK PAIN IN THE FEMALE ATHLETE: THROUGH

QF-78. S. Tanaka 1, T.Yokoyama 1, K.Takeuchi 1, K.Wada 2, T. Tanaka 2, S.Abrakawa 2, G.Kumagai 2, T.Asari 2, A.Ono 2, Y.

Therapeutic Exercise And Manual Therapy For Persons With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

The Role of Interventional Procedures in Sports Medicine

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Degenerative Disc Disease of Cervical Spine in Symptomatic Patients

Identification of a Novel Common Genetic Risk Factor for Lumbar Disk Disease Original Contribution JAMA, Vol. 285 No. 14: , April 11, 2001

Interventional Pain. Judith Dunipace MD Board certified in Anesthesiology, Pain Management and Hospice and Palliative Care

Medical Policy Vertebral Axial Decompression Section 8.0 Therapy Subsection 8.03 Rehabilitation. Description. Related Policies.

Self-Directed Structured Spine Care. David Hanscom, MD Swedish Neuroscience Specialists Seattle, WA

LONG-TERM EFFECT ANALYSIS OF IDD THERAPY IN LOW BACK PAIN: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL PILOT STUDY

Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(2): /ISSN: /IJCEM Yi Yang, Hao Liu, Yueming Song, Tao Li

U.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS

Vertebral Axial Decompression

Evaluation and Treatment of Intra-articular Fractures. Benjamin Maxson, DO Florida Orthopaedic Institute Orthopaedic Trauma Service

Samir Lapsiwala, MD. Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute Fort Worth Brain and Spine Institute GEN-SP-32

Methods of MR Fat Quantification and their Pros and Cons

Vijay Singh, M.D Roosevelt Rd., Niagara, WI 54151

Corporate Medical Policy

Alan H Daniels, MD. Spine Division, Department of Orthopaedics Warren Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University

Supplementary Online Content

Case Report Discoscopic Findings of High Signal Intensity Zones on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lumbar Intervertebral Discs

Thoracolumbar Spine Conditions: Treatment and Return to Play

Which of my patients with chronic back pain doesn t need an MRI? (This could be a short talk) Neil Berrington MMed,FCS,FRCS

Transcription:

Single Voxel MR Spectroscopy in Non-Herniated Painful, Herniated Painful, and Non-Painful Lumbar Discs PG Lactate col L Tanenbaum 1, S Hu 2, M Gornet 3, S Berven 2, J Peacock 4, J Lotz 2,4, D Bradford 4, J Claude 4, P Kane 4, F Schranck 3, D Stewart 5 1 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 2 University of California San Francisco, 3 Orthopedic Center of Saint Louis, 4 Nocimed, LLC, 5 MRI Partners of Chesterfield 1

Disclosures Tanenbaum, L: Nocimed, LLC - advisory board Bradford, D; Lotz, J: Nocimed, LLC - management, shareholder, royalty Kane, P; Claude, J: Nocimed, LLC - shareholder, consulting Peacock, J: Nocimed, LLC - management, shareholder Schranck, F; Gornet, M: The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis - Nocimed sponsored research grant, Nocimed, LLC - shareholder 2

Purpose Evaluate non-invasive in vivo single voxel MR spectroscopy (SVS) in lumbar discs on two commercial 3T scanners - GE Signa & Siemens Verio for a) discogenic low back pain (LBP) pain patients receiving provocative discography (PD), and b) asymptomatic control volunteers (ASY) Correlate results to clinical phenotypes non-herniated painful (NHP) herniated painful (HP) non-painful (NP) discs 3

Background Disc degeneration altered disc structure and biochemical composition that may or may not cause pain decreased proteoglycan synthesis increase matrix catabolism features that differentiate painful from non painful degenerative discs not well understood. *Buser, 2010 Spine: Affiliated Society Meeting Abstracts

Background Disc degeneration consistent changes in markers of hypoxia, innervation and inflammation showed strong correlation with discs associated with pain Nucleus samples Gene expression with highest correlation between painful vs. nonpainful discs relate to (R2=.67): 1. hypoxia - lactate dehydrogenase; 2. innervation - nerve growth factor. *Buser, 2010 Spine: Affiliated Society Meeting Abstracts

Background Identifying the painful disc Painful discs are distinguished by hypoxia, inflammation, neovascularization & neoinnervation* Consistent changes in biomarkers/chemical mediators detectable and quantifiable with MR spectroscopy *Freemont, A. J., (2009) Rheumatology; 48:5 10.

Non-Painful Disc (Scoliosis) n=9 Background-Ex vivo Disc SVS, 11T HR MAS Surgical Samples PG/LA PG Lactate p<.005 col Painful Disc (PD+, LBP) n=9 Lactate col PG Keshari, Spine 2008. 33(3): p. 312-317 8

Materials & Methods Iterative technical development protocol Conducted in series: GE (2008-10), Siemens (2011-13) T1/T2 weighted imaging sequences SVS acquisition, each lumbar disc sequentially Inter-platform differences: OVS bands: GE only (not used for Siemens) Autoshim Auto + Manual shim: Siemens protocol refinement Manual voxel localization in disc to remove end-plates 9

Materials & Methods Acquisition Systems GE Signa HDxt 3.0T, v14x HDCTL 456 spine coil Pulse Sequence: custom Chess/Press modified PROSE TM for disc SVS: TR=1500, TE=28ms Siemens 3T Verio, Model 10276755 Numaris/4 Spine Coil Model 8622743 Pulse Sequence: SVS Syngo VB17 Version 1.0 investigational patch for 3-5mm voxel height Both single center, Nocimed sponsored, IRB approved GE 3T: University of California at San Francisco Siemens 3T: The Orthopedic Center of St. Louis 10

Materials & Methods signal post-processing Non-Painful Disc Non- Painful Automated Channel Select Frame Edit Phase/Freq Apodize Aggregate Baseline 11

Materials & Methods technical success & signal quality assessment GE data: initial in vivo development cycle of entire approach Reported data not include technical failures for poor signal quality Technical failures = only indeterminate results of Dx correlation algorithm SIEMENS data: x-platform application/refinement of prior learning Less technical development required Reported data includes all completed acquisitions - signal quality successes & failures Primary Signal (satisfactory) Quality Assessment Criteria: o SNR > 3 for PG or LA peak regions o Water FWHM < 35 Hz o Presence (fail) or Absence (accept) of lipid motion artifact 12

Materials & Methods diagnostic interpretation/correlation to disc type Different approach per platform, serial development phases Earlier GE platform data: Multi-variate (PG & LA) automated statistical algorithm development via JMP logistic regression software Predictive value of SVS biomarker measures for painful vs. non-painful Later Siemens platform data: Simple PG/LA ratio Predictive value/statistical modeling planned (> more pain patients) 1% 1% 99% 13

Materials & Methods study design inclusion criteria Male and non-pregnant females, 18-70 yrs old Pain group: Oswestry Disability Index 40%, or Visual Analog Scale 4 Indicated for Lumbar Spine Provocation Discography (PD) Practice Guidelines for Spinal Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures (ISIS, 2004) PD performed 6wk-6mo before, or 1mo after, Disc SVS exam Up to 12 mo before in earlier GE study Asymptomatic control volunteers: Absent chronic severe LBP VAS 1, ODI 10. 14

Materials & Methods study design exclusion criteria Complicating extradiscal pain sources fracture, spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis Prior lumbar surgery or intradiscal treatments except diagnostic provocative or anesthetic discography Chronic disease or pain, or psychological dysfunction, relevant to study objectives 15

GE study n= 42 Subjects, 79 Discs 1 Pain Pts (PD) n=14 Volunteers n=28 Painful Discs (PD+) Non-Painful Discs (PD-) Non-Painful Discs (assumed) n = 15 n = 49 n = 15 + Control, Painful n = 64 - Control, Non-Painful 16

Siemens study n=33 Subjects, 130 Discs 1 Pain Pts (PD) n=14 Volunteers n=19 Non-Herniated Painful Discs (PD+) Herniated Painful Discs (PD+) Non-Painful Discs (PD- & remote levels) Non-Painful Discs (assumed) n = 16 n = 103 1 n = 3 2 n = 9 n = 119 1 1 Includes n=1 disc excluded from analysis as non-lumbar (S1-S2) 2 Includes n=1 disc analyzed separately due to extra discal co-morbidities (spondylosis + facet arthropathy) 17

Results- 3T GE Signa Case 1, Pain Pt (PD+ L5S1, PD- L4L5) Discogram: +/- - + Hu, Orthopaedic Research Society 2010 18

Results - GE 3T Signa 94% (74/79) Determinate, 99% (73/74) Accurate (PG,LA) PG & LA-related Dx Algorithm score SVS Positive n=13 all true+ * SVS Indeterminate n=5 SVS Negative n=60 true-, 1 false- * Hu, Orthopaedic Research Society 2010 19

Case 2 3T Siemens Verio NHP Pain Pt, 2-level PD+/- Discogram: +/- L1-L2 4mm L2-L3 5mm L3-L4 5mm 0 L4-L5 6mm 10 L5-S1 6mm 22

Results - Siemens 3T Verio Signal Quality Success 85% (100% Manual Shim, >1mm) 140 Technical Success, Signal Quality - Siemens 3T Verio 120 15% 2 11 7 Lipid/motion Low SNR < 3x Poor Shim (WaterFWHM > 35Hz) Success 100 Discs (#) 80 60 85% 110 20% 2 10 6 Both 1mm Voxels 40 80% 74 5% 0 1 20 0 130 Discs 32 Subjects 95% 92 Discs 38 Discs 11 Subjects Total Autoshim only Auto+Manual Shim Protocol Development (Shim) 36 23

Results - Siemens 3T Verio Autoshim only vs. Auto+Manual Shim Example Asymptomatic Control Volunteer Autoshim Only (Fail Water FWHM) Auto+Manual shim L1L2 4mm L2L3 4mm N313 24

Conclusions disc SVS signal quality - reliability 100% robust disc spectra per signal quality criteria @ 3mm disc height per later protocol refinements (autoshim + manual shim) of the Siemens 3T platform study 80% reliability w/ autoshim only 25

Results Siemens 3T Verio PG/LA Dx Correlation vs. Disc Type Controls (n=110) Disc SVS PG/LA Ratio vs. Disc Type 10.00 log PG/LA Ratio, Lumbar Disc SVS 1.00 0.10 n=1 n=1 n=8 n=100 0 PD+ 1 PD+ 2 PD+ 3 NC 4 5 Non-herniated Non-herniated,Spondy Herniated (PD- and ASY) 26

Combined Siemens & GE 3T Results PG & LA correlate 174/175 (>99%) discs, 72 subjects 100% 90% 80% Dx Correlation Results, GE & Siemens 3T Combined (PG & LA-based Dx Algorithms separately developed, MR platform-specific) 7% n=1 0% n=0 70% Discs (#) 60% 50% 40% 93% 100% n=13 n=161 30% 20% 10% Mis-Match vs. Control Match vs. Control 0% Painful Control Disc Type Non-Painful 27

Conclusions Combined PG & LA-related results from the two serial GE & Siemens 3T platform disc SVS development studies reflects >99% correlation between classic contained discogenic pain and non-painful discs in 175 total discs in 72 subjects 100% PPV for pain in 13 painful PD+ discs 0% False+ in 161 non-painful discs 28

Conclusions Disc SVS may be most appropriate for classic contained axial discogenic low back pain w/o extradiscal pain generators, vs. pain caused by extradiscal morbidities (e.g. herniations, facet, vertebral abnormalities) may still enhance Dx regimen in multi-factorial cases involving both intra-discal and extra-discal pain sources 29

Single Voxel MR Spectroscopy in Non-Herniated Painful, Herniated Painful, and Non-Painful Lumbar Discs PG Lactate col L Tanenbaum 1, S Hu 2, M Gornet 3, S Berven 2, J Peacock 4, J Lotz 2,4, D Bradford 4, J Claude 4, P Kane 4, F Schranck 3, D Stewart 5 1 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 2 University of California San Francisco, 3 Orthopedic Center of Saint Louis, 4 Nocimed, LLC, 5 MRI Partners of Chesterfield 30