EU-SILC 2013 MODULE ON WELL-BEING DESCRIPTION OF SILC SECONDARY TARGET VARIABLES Version 5 March 2012

Similar documents
2013 EU-SILC MODULE ON WELLBEING Assessment of the implementation

ANALYSING THE LINK BETWEEN TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR, RESIDENTIAL LOCATION CHOICE AND WELL-BEING. A FOCUS ON TRAVEL SATISFACTION OF LEISURE TRIPS.

Item 2.2 Household definition

Wellbeing and communities Builth Wells 27 Feb 2018 Ingrid Abreu Scherer

HEALTH STATUS QUESTIONNAIRE 2.0

For each question you will be asked to fill in a bubble in each line: 1. How strongly do you agree or disagree with each of the following statements?

Investigating Subjective Well-being on the Opinions Survey Lucy Tinkler

Mgr. Tetiana Korovchenko, Mgr. Jan Mandys, Ph.D. University of Pardubice

What influences wellbeing?

Quality of society and individual well-being: key findings from the European Quality of Life Survey

Wellbeing, community connections and resilience of dairy farmers

A Partial Ordering Application in Synthesizing Dimensions of Subjective Well-being

The Wellbeing Agenda: Opportunities for Transport Policy

Youth Social Action Survey Wave 2 Topline results

WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES PRIVACY SHIELD POLICY

Risk Issues. Europeans Views. Anne-Laure Gassin. Communications Director, EFSA

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE

Alcohol: A conversation. A comprehensive approach for schools

Family/Caregiver Survey

Note on the harmonisation of SILC and EHIS questions on health

Pediatric Allergies in America: A Landmark Survey of Nasal Allergy Sufferers

Subjective Well-Being Study

The City of El Cerrito, California

Problems and challenges faced by professional working women in food processing companies in Gujarat Mr. Deval Patel 1, Dr.

Wisconsin Quality of Life Caregiver Questionnaire Wisconsin Quality of Life Associates University of Wisconsin - Madison.

Tel

The Center for Community Studies at Jefferson Community College. Presentation of Results: Nineteenth Annual JEFFERSON COUNTY

Risk perception and food safety: where do European consumers stand today?

Worker Happiness in Korea

Patient Follow-up Form - Version 1.1

2014 Hong Kong Altruism Index Survey

Apex Police Department 2016 Community Satisfaction Survey Summary

To obtain the PowerPoint file for this presentation, please Charlotte Shoup Olsen,

A Multi-Method Exploration of How Work Contributes to Well-Being

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Promoting Research Integrity. Show Me the Data! Scientific Approaches to Strengthening Research Integrity in Nutrition and Energetics

3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership (WCLTA-2012) Educating young people for quality of life improvement

Thinking Like a Researcher

(In The Context of Human Behavior) Society, the need for social living. The difference between human and animal society

25-26 May 2015 Ditsong Museum

Fieldwork: February March 2010 Publication: October 2010

Brandon Police Service. Community Engagement Survey

Attitudes, Awareness and Understanding

Healthy People, Healthy Communities

Autism Strategy Survey 2017

PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SUBJECTIVE WELLBEING: A PROPOSAL FOR INTERNATIONALLY COMPARABLE INDICATORS

THE GOOD LIFE I DEX. Self-fulfilment. Relationships. Socioeconomic. Individual indicators. Security. indicators. Health.

Paradoxes of well-being

Prescription for Progress Study conducted by the Siena College Research Institute April 10 - May 4, Stakeholders - MOE +/- 4.

Preserving Our Diversity (POD) Pilot Key Assessment Findings and Observations as of June 2018

GENERAL WELL-BEING 20

Death at work: Improving support for families

Measuring Illicit Tobacco Markets

Environmental Prevention Practices

Professor Claire Wallace Professor Pamela Abbott

THE OECD SOCIAL CAPITAL QUESTION DATABANK USER GUIDE

Summary and conclusion Replication of a measurement instrument for social exclusion

State of Connecticut Department of Education Division of Teaching and Learning Programs and Services Bureau of Special Education

An Evaluation of the Success of Saving-Growing Personal Assets Project: Individual Development Accounts for People with Developmental Disabilities

Code of Practice on HIV/AIDS and Other Life Threatening Illnesses for the Public Sector. Ministry of Labour

TIPSHEET QUESTION WORDING

Hull s Adult Health and Lifestyle Survey: Summary

You Can Make a Difference! On-site, non-medical patient support Impact the lives of those affected by cancer

2 Psychological Processes : An Introduction

Innovation in Autism Practice: The Future is Calling

Subjective Indicators: Usefulness and Information Potential for Policy Making - Some Introductory Remarks - Heinz-Herbert Noll

The Clean Environment Commission. Public Participation in the Environmental Review Process

QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT KIT

Grievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018

active lives adult survey

issue. Some Americans and criminal justice officials want to protect inmates access to

MEMBER SATISFACTION SURVEY

MARK SCHEME MAXIMUM MARK: 60

Holas, Jakub et al. Regionální kriminalita a její odraz v kvalitě života obyvatel Regional crime and its impact on quality of life Summary

OECD work on Subjective Well-being

HIV in the UK: Changes and Challenges; Actions and Answers The People Living With HIV Stigma Survey UK 2015 Scotland STIGMA SURVEY UK 2015

PUBLIC HAPPINESS HEIRs conference 2013, Rome 4-5 June. Department of Labour Market and Social Policies Social Inclusion Area Rome, Corso Italia 33

Surveys of Rochdale Family Project Workers and Families

Brussels, 20 December 2011 (Case ) 1. Proceedings

FOUR STEPS TO SAVE LIVES. How we can act effectively to reduce suicide in Wales. #4steps

CCES. Couple's Premium Report.

Definitions of Indicators

MRS Best Practice Guide on Research Participant Vulnerability

Community wellbeing Voice of the User report: Summary for stakeholders

EPIC. Purpose of Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PILOT PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM SERVICES

Developing a Comprehensive and One-Dimensional Subjective Well-Being Measurement: Evidence from a Belgian Pilot Survey

Becoming Donor-Centered....what donors want and how to lead your team in adopting Donor-Centered Fundraising

Introduction: Foundation, history and general concept of human rights

PRICE DEMERS & CO. Barristers, Solicitors & Notaries Public

Assessment of Mental Capacity and Best Interest Decisions

CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST I/II

HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES: KEY CONCEPTS

North-West Mental Wellbeing Survey 2013 Wirral results

Transport for Healthy, Happy, and Holistic Living

2017 Social Service Funding Application - Special Alcohol Funds

THE VIRTUE OF GENEROSITY

Creating an Index to Measure Wellbeing and Predict Life Satisfaction in Athens, Georgia Series 1: January 2018

TAXOTERE: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IT

Vulnerable Adults Housing & Well-Being Support. Easy Read Version Consultation Questionnaire

Calculating CAHPS Hospice Survey Top-Box Scores

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROSTAT Directorate F: Social and information society statistics Unit F-3: Living conditions and social protection EU-SILC 2013 MODULE ON WELL-BEING DESCRIPTION OF SILC SECONDARY TARGET VARIABLES Version 5 March 2012

Unit Information should be provided for all current household members, or if applicable, for all selected respondents, aged 16 and over. Mode of data collection Given the type of information to be collected, only personal interviews are allowed. In particular, proxy interviews are not allowed. Reference period The reference period for all target variables is the current situation, except for the five variables on emotional well-being, which refer to the past four weeks. Data transmission The target secondary variables should be sent to the Commission (Eurostat) in the Personal Data File (P-file) after the target primary variables.

PW010: Overall life satisfaction 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) Life satisfaction represents a report of how a respondent evaluates or appraises his or her life taken as a whole. It is intended to represent a broad, reflective appraisal the person makes of his or her life. The term life is intended here as all areas of a person s life at a particular point in time (these days) 1. The variable therefore refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with his/her life. It focuses on how people are feeling "these days" rather than specifying a longer or shorter time period. The intent is not to obtain the current emotional state of the respondent but for them to make a reflective judgement on their level of satisfaction. 1 E. Diener, Guidelines for National Indicators of Subjective Well-Being and Ill-Being.

PW020: Meaning of life 0-10 From 0 (Not worthwhile at all) to 10 (Completely worthwhile) This variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feelings. Meaning in life is a multi-faceted construct that has been conceptualized in diverse ways. It refers broadly to the value and purpose of life, important life goals, and for some, spirituality. The respondent should be invited to think about what makes his/her life and existence feel important and meaningful and then answer to the question. The term "worthwhile" denotes meaning of purpose/beneficial. It is not related to any specific area of life, focuses rather on life in general.

PW030: Satisfaction with financial situation 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with the financial situation of his/her household. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas of his/her financial situation in a particular point in time (these days). In doing so, Respondent should take into account income adequacy, level of savings, capacity to pay back debt and money owed, ability to meet large emergency expenses, level of assets for the entire household.

PW040: Satisfaction with accommodation 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with the accommodation in terms of meeting the household needs/opinion on the price (intended as financial burden related to accommodation), taking into account space, neighbourhood, distance to work, quality and other aspects.

PW050: Being very nervous 1 All of the time 2 Most of the time 3 Some of the time 4 A little of the time 5 None of the time 9 Do not know Reference period: past 4 weeks Variables PW050-090 are based on self-rated affects or emotions and aim at measuring psychological wellbeing. 1 The variable refers to the respondent s feeling, he/she should be invited to indicate to what extent he/she has felt this way during the past four weeks. For "being nervous" it should be intended a status characterized by or showing emotional tension, restlessness, agitation, etc. 1 Further reference can be found in EHIS Guidelines (http://circa.europa.eu/public/irc/dsis/health/library?l=/methodologiessandsdatasc/healthsinterviewssur vey/2007-2008_methodology/2007-2009_guidelinespdf/_en_1.0_&a=d or on Iqola (International quality of life assessment) website www.iqola.org

PW060: Feeling down in the dumps 1 All of the time 2 Most of the time 3 Some of the time 4 A little of the time 5 None of the time 9 Do not know Reference period: past 4 weeks Variables PW050-090 are based on self-rated affects or emotions and aim at measuring psychological wellbeing. 1 The variable refers to the respondent s feeling. He/she should be invited to indicate to what extent he/she has felt this way during the past four weeks. 1 Further reference can be found in EHIS Guidelines (http://circa.europa.eu/public/irc/dsis/health/library?l=/methodologiessandsdatasc/healthsinterviewssur vey/2007-2008_methodology/2007-2009_guidelinespdf/_en_1.0_&a=d or on Iqola (International quality of life assessment) website www.iqola.org

PW070: Feeling calm and peaceful 1 All of the time 2 Most of the time 3 Some of the time 4 A little of the time 5 None of the time 9 Do not know Reference period: past 4 weeks Variables PW050-090 are based on self-rated affects or emotions and aim at measuring psychological wellbeing. 1 The variable refers to the respondent s feeling. He/she should be invited to indicate to what extent he/she has felt this way during the past four weeks. 1 Further reference can be found in EHIS Guidelines (http://circa.europa.eu/public/irc/dsis/health/library?l=/methodologiessandsdatasc/healthsinterviewssur vey/2007-2008_methodology/2007-2009_guidelinespdf/_en_1.0_&a=d or on Iqola (International quality of life assessment) website www.iqola.org

PW080: Feeling downhearted or depressed 1 All of the time 2 Most of the time 3 Some of the time 4 A little of the time 5 None of the time 9 Do not know Reference period: past 4 weeks Variables PW050-090 are based on self-rated affects or emotions and aim at measuring psychological wellbeing. 1 The variable refers to the respondent s feeling. He/she should be invited to indicate to what extent he/she has felt this way during the past four weeks. 1 Further reference can be found in EHIS Guidelines (http://circa.europa.eu/public/irc/dsis/health/library?l=/methodologiessandsdatasc/healthsinterviewssur vey/2007-2008_methodology/2007-2009_guidelinespdf/_en_1.0_&a=d or on Iqola (International quality of life assessment) website www.iqola.org

PW090: Being happy 1 All of the time 2 Most of the time 3 Some of the time 4 A little of the time 5 None of the time 9 Do not know Reference period: past 4 weeks Variables PW050-090 are based on self-rated affects or emotions and aim at measuring psychological wellbeing. 1 The variable refers to the respondent s feeling. He/she should be invited to indicate to what extent he/she has felt this way during the past four weeks. 1 Further reference can be found in EHIS Guidelines (http://circa.europa.eu/public/irc/dsis/health/library?l=/methodologiessandsdatasc/healthsinterviewssur vey/2007-2008_methodology/2007-2009_guidelinespdf/_en_1.0_&a=d or on Iqola (International quality of life assessment) website www.iqola.org

PW100: Job satisfaction 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) -2 Not applicable (PL031 not = 1, 2, 3 or 4) who are currently working (PL031 = 1, 2, 3 or 4) Flag -2 should only be used when the respondent did not declare him/herself as working (PL031 not = 1, 2, 3 or 4). The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with his/her job. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas of his/her job in a particular point in time (current situation). The activity status is based on the person's own perception of their main activity. This is in principle, determined on the basis of the most time spent, but no criteria have been specified explicitly 1. If the respondent has several jobs he/she should refer to the main job. If the respondent works and studies at the same time he/she should refer to the current job if he/she declared the job as the current economic activity in variable PL031. Otherwise flag -2 should be used. 1 For further references on self defined economic status, see description of Variable PL031 on Doc 65

PW110: Satisfaction with commuting time 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) -2 Not applicable (PL031 not = 1, 2, 3 or 4) -4 Not applicable (home office) who are currently working (PL031 = 1, 2, 3 or 4) Flag -2 should only be used when the respondent did not declare him/herself as working (PL031 not = 1, 2, 3 or 4). Flag -4 should only be used when the respondent declared him/herself as working (PL031 = 1, 2, 3 or 4) and is working at home. The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with the commuting time. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas of his/her commuting time to work in a particular point in time (current).

PW120: Satisfaction with time use 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas of his/her time use in a particular point in time (current). The respondent should not be given clues. By default the things the respondent likes doing are essentially a self-defined and a self-perceived concept.

PW130: Trust in the political system 0-10 From 0 (No trust at all) to 10 (Complete trust) The variable is of general nature and refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling. The term 'political system' refers to a complete set of institutions, interest groups (such as political parties, trade unions), the relationships between those institutions and the political norms and rules that govern their functions.

PW140: Trust in the legal system 0-10 From 0 (No trust at all) to 10 (Complete trust) The variable is of general nature and refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling. The term 'legal system' refers to the entire system for interpreting and enforcing the laws and not to a specific legal entity within the country. Trust in the legal system is supposed to measure, for example, opinions and attitudes towards the effectiveness and efficiency of the institutions such as the courts, the fairness of its procedures and decisions, and the extent to which the sentences given out reflect the values and desires of citizens. - 16 -

PW150: Trust in the police 0-10 From 0 (No trust at all) to 10 (Complete trust) The variable is of general nature and refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling. The term 'police' refers to the police as an institution. - 17 -

PW160: Satisfaction with personal relationships 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with his/her personal relationships. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas of his/her personal relationships in a particular point in time (these days). Personal relationships should cover all possible relationships with e.g. relatives, friends, colleagues from work etc. - 18 -

PW170: Personal matters (anyone to discuss with) 1 Yes 2 No 9 Do not know The variable refers to the presence of at least one person the respondent can discuss personal matters with. The potential is of having somebody to discuss personal matters with whether the respondent has needs it or not. - 19 -

PW180: Help from others 1 Yes 2 No 9 Do not know -2 I have no relatives, friends, neighbours Flag -2 should only be used when the respondent declares he/she has no relatives, friends and neighbours. The variable refers to the respondent's possibility to ask for help (any kind of help: moral, material or financial) from any relatives, friends or neighbours. The question is about possibility for the respondent to ask for help whether the respondent needs it or not. Only relatives and friends (or neighbours) who don't live in the same household as the respondent should be considered. - 20 -

PW190: Trust in others 0-10 From 0 (You do not trust any other person) to 10 (Most people can be trusted) The variable is of general nature. It does not refer to a specific group of people. - 21 -

PW200: Satisfaction with recreational or green areas 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) Flag -3 should only be used in countries where the selected respondents' model applies The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with the recreational or green areas in the place where he/she lives. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of recreational or green areas in a particular point in time (these days). The term 'place where you live' refers to the place situated close to the place of residence (where you usually go shopping, go for a walk, walk the way home). The term ' recreational or green areas' refers to the places where the respondent can walk, cycle, do some recreational activities, etc. - 22 -

PW210: Satisfaction with living environment 0-10 From 0 (Not at all satisfied) to 10 (Completely satisfied) Flag -3 should only be used in countries where the selected respondents' model applies The variable refers to the respondent s opinion/feeling about the degree of satisfaction with the quality of his/her living environment. As in variable PW010 the respondent should make a broad, reflective appraisal of all areas related to living environment in a particular point in time (these days). The term 'living environment' refers to the access to services (e.g. shops, public transport etc.), the presence of cinema, museums, theatres, etc in the place where the respondent lives. The term 'place respondent lives' refers to the place situated close to the place of residence (where you usually go shopping, go for a walk, go the way home). - 23 -

PW220: Physical security 1 Very safe 2 Fairly safe 3 A bit unsafe 4 Very unsafe 9 Do not know Flag -3 should only be used in countries where the selected respondents' model applies The term 'area' refers to the place situated close to the place of residence (where you usually go shopping, go for a walk, go the way home). - 24 -