ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF NATURAL PATHOGENS ON SUGARBEET ROOT MAGGOT THROUGH SURVEYS

Similar documents
Sugarbeet Root Maggot

CONTROL OF COTTON APHID AND GREENHOUSE WHITEFLY WITH A FUNGAL PATHOGEN

Management of Root Diseases in Sugarbeet

PROJECT PROPOSAL SUGARBEET RESEARCH AND EDUCATION BOARD OF MINNESOTA AND NORTH DAKOTA FY

Managing Fusarium Diseases of Vegetables

A novel method for the management of mealybug in Cotton.

Forest Pest Management SD14 M CI Report 87-12

Detection and Management of Microsporidia and Ophryocystis elecktroscirrha (OE) in Insect Rearing Laboratories

1. INTRODUCTION. oldest commercial crops, plays a key role in the economic and social affairs of the world

Life-cycle Parameters of Aphelenchus avenae. on Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Fusarium wilt of strawberry. Tom Gordon

Fusarium root rot of soybean occurrence, impact, and relationship with soybean cyst nematode

The Influence of Entomophtorales Isolates on Aphids Aphis fabae and Metopeurum fuscoviride

Curre nt Status of the Solanaceous Fruit Fly Control Project in Yonaguni Island. Abstract

The Use of Sludge from Cow Manure Biodigester as Fertilizer and Carrier of Cordyceps sp. for White Grub Pest Control

STUDIES ON FUNGAL POPULATION OF CUMIN (NIGELLA SATIVA L.) FROM DIFFERENT PARTS OF MARATHWADA.

A REVIEW OF AFRICAN CASSAVA MOSAIC VIRUS (ACMV) IRDA SAFNI, SP, MCP. FAKULTAS PERTANIAN Jurusan Hama dan Penyakit Tumbuhan UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA

Deoxynivalenol: Known Facts and Research Questions. DON (deoxynivalenol) is a damaging toxin produced by the fungus Fusarium

Dry Bean Fertility Dave Franzen NDSU Soil Science Specialist

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Early Warning Scouting Program Project Report October 2007

Cotton Insect Control in Arizona

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

ISPM No. 30 ESTABLISHMENT OF AREAS OF LOW PEST PREVALENCE FOR FRUIT FLIES (TEPHRITIDAE) (2008)

Cannabis Aphid (Phorodon cannabis)

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

Studies on biodiversity of entomopathogenic fungi isolated from all the agro-climatic zones of Karnataka

Update from Israel on the Polyphagous Shot Hole Borer and its Fusarium fungal symbiont

Predicting the Unpredictable: Disease Factors in Small Grain Production. Juliet M. Marshall. Idaho Falls and Aberdeen R&E Centers

THE PEST NAGEME NT GUIDE

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

Distribution and Incidence of Sugar Beet Diseases in the Wind River and Big Horn River Basins of Northwest Wyoming

Fusarium Diseases of Tomato. Hung Doan, Gene Miyao and Mike Davi Department of Plant Pathology University of California, Davis

Insecticide Resistance Questions to answer: What is resistance?

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SCHIZONYCHA AFFINIS BEETLES TO NATIVE STRAINS OF BEAUVERIA BRONGNIARTII IN SOUTH AFRICA

ONION BREEDING. Onion Breeder: PAOLO Pagan Seed Company: CORA Seeds

Plant Disease and Insect Advisory

Potential Wheat Disease Issues on Seed, Seedlings, Leaves, and Heads for Wheat in the Central Texas Blacklands and Beyond for the Season

Molecular Biology and Etiology of FOV in Cotton

Presenter. Allison Crimmins, MS, MPP Climate Change Division Office of Atmospheric Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Scientific and technical work

Developing a First Detector Network for Utah. Cooperative A g Pest Sur vey Coordinator

Gypsy Moth Background Information

Climate change and vector-borne diseases of livestock in the tropics. Peter Van den Bossche

Project title: Fusarium wilt of lettuce: management through detection, avoidance and disease resistance

whereas the fourth inhibitor was extracted and semi purified from cabbage (Brassica oleracae) in the Insect Physiology Laboratory of the Department of

P.J. Cotty, Page NO.1 of 8.

GAINES COUNTY IPM NEWSLETTER Manda G. Cattaneo, Extension Agent - IPM 101 S. Main RM B-8. Seminole, TX 79360

Plant Pathogen Suppression the Synergistic Effect between Biofertilizer and Irradiated Oligochitosan of Tomato

Biopesticide-based products and strategies for control of tree pests. Professor Tariq M. Butt

oxysporum f, sp, ciceri and Meloidogyne javanica

MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF CABBAGE MAGGOT, DELIA RADICUM, IN CAULIFLOWER, III. Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Bionomics of Fruit Fly, Bectrocera cucurbitae (Coquillet) on Cucumber under Laboratory Condition

Kansas State University Extension Entomology Newsletter

Root Rot Complex in Western Canada where are we at with Fusarium, Aphanomyces, and Phytophthora

Seed Pathogens and Seed Treatments

AMADEPA Association Martiniquaise pour le Developpement des Plantes Alimentaires

The Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Central America

A Bibliography of the Sugarbeet Root Maggot, Tetanops myopaeformis (Roder) (Diptera:Otitidae)

ERGOT. Ergot as a Plant Disease. Symptoms and Signs. PP-551 (revised), May 2002

The Changing Face of Agriculture: fruit flies, innovation and global trade

Antagonistic Activity and Shelf Life Study of Trichoderma harzianum (Rifai)

Pathogen Information and Management

and Vegetables for Decay Control

Thermo-Therapy and Use of Biofungicides and Fungicides for Management of Internal Discoloration of Horseradish Roots

Introduction to Pecan Diseases and General Management

En tornology. FUNGI PARASITIC ON THE NYMPH OF MOGANNZA HEBES WALKER IN TAIWAN L. S; Leu and Z. N. Wang Tainan Sugar Experiment Station Tainan, Taiwan

Comparative Toxicity of Certain Pesticides to Peach Fruit Fly, Bactrocera zonata Saunders (Diptera: Tephritidae) under Laboratory Conditions

[Attachment] Survey guidelines for major fruit flies

Drought Effects on Chromaphis juglandicola Walnut Aphid Population Dynamics on Walnut Seedlings. Katherine M. Patterson ABSTRACT KEYWORDS

POSTHARVEST RESPIRATION RATE AND SUCROSE CONCENTRATION OF RHIZOCTONIA-INFECTED SUGARBEET ROOTS

Case Study: As the Worm Turns Speciation and the Apple Fly Maggot Introduction: Task: Final Product:

Field Guide to Maize Diseases in Hawaii Seed Corn Nurseries. By David Case

AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF. effects, but may not be good predictors of field effects. A case study was

Managing Soybean Cyst Nematode

Volume XII, Number 17 September 18, Silver Scurf and Black Dot Development on Fresh Marketed Russet Norkotah Tubers in Storage

Table 1 Disease Ratings* May 22 May 30 Tst Treatment and rate/a Inc Sev Fld Sev Inc Sev Fld Sev Bu/A** LSD P=

DISTRIBUTIONS OF ENTOMOPHAGA MAIMAIGA RESTING SPORES IN OAK FORESTS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GYPSY MOTH POPULATIONS*

BIOL 208: Principles of Ecology and Evolution Lab Week 5, 6, &7. Bioenergetics of Caterpillars

The wheat stem sawfly a nursery tale from the shortgrass prairie

Sorghum Grain Mold: Variability in Fungal Complex

Biology, distribution, and insecticide susceptibility status of Florida vectors of Zika virus.

THE IMPACT OF NITROGEN AND SILICON NUTRITION ON THE RESISTANCE OF SUGARCANE VARIETIES TO ELDANA SACCHARINA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

Investigation on Diversity, Distribution and Periodicity of Fungi in Shanthi Sagar Lake of Davangere District, Karnataka, India

How important are trees for our planet?

Citrus Disease ID and Control. Ben Faber UC Cooperative Extension

UNDERSTANDING ZIKA AND MOSQUITO BORNE ILLNESSES

Survey for the Incidence of Root Rot/Wilt of Fenugreek in Northern Karnataka, India

Arbovirus Surveillance in Massachusetts 2016 Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) Arbovirus Surveillance Program

Population Dynamics of Three Species of Genus Bactrocera (Diptera: Tephritidae: Dacinae) in BARI, Chakwal (Punjab)

Management Strategies for the Cotton Aphid. Jeff Gore USDA-ARS, Stoneville

The Threat of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly1 to American Agriculture and Efforts Being Made to Counter This Threat2 3

Hands-on identification of vegetable diseases: Roses

Global Climate Change and Mosquito-Borne Diseases

An IPM 1 Approach to Managing Herbicide Resistant Ryegrass in Northeast Texas. October, 2014 J. Swart, A. Braley, R. Sutton, S. Stewart, D.

From the. The Latest News from the California Avocado Industry. CAC s 40th year Read more on page 20

Changes in epidemiology and population structure of P. infestans in Finland

Rearing Fopius arisanus (Sonan) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Mediterranean Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Transcription:

ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF NATURAL PATHOGENS ON SUGARBEET ROOT MAGGOT THROUGH SURVEYS Ayanava Majumdar, Post-doctoral Associate Mark A. Boetel, Associate Professor Robert J. Dregseth, Research Specialist { SHAPE \* MERGEFORMAT } Department of Entomology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND Introduction Sugarbeet root maggot (SBRM), Tetanops myopaeformis (Röder) (Diptera: Ulidiidae), is a major concern for sugarbeet producers in the Red River Valley (RRV) of North Dakota and Minnesota. Almost the entire sugarbeet acreage infested with SBRM is treated with chemical insecticide. Treatments are generally directed toward the larval stage of its life cycle. Larvae and are affected by a variety of biotic and abiotic environmental factors in their subterranean habitat. While there is some available information regarding the effects of abiotic elements on SBRM larvae, information on the effects of biotic factors on the SBRM life cycle is lacking due to the cryptic nature of this insect. The pupa is a vulnerable stage in the SBRM life cycle because it is unable to escape or protect itself from hazardous elements. However, the nonfeeding pupal stage of the root maggot is generally overlooked. The skin (or cuticle) of the third-instar larva becomes a natural barrier to environmental hazards. If this protective layer is breached then this stage can die or develop abnormalities. This report summarizes findings from one preliminary and two systematic surveys conducted over a three-year period (2004-2006). The work involved individual screening of 4,117 specimens from over 18 collection sites. This report not only provides information about a newly-isolated native SBRM pathogen, but also provides information about the effect of climate on the biology of this pest. 2004 Survey. Personnel of the NDSU sugarbeet entomology regularly collect subterranean stages of the root maggot for future research. A previously unobserved phenomenon was observed on one of these trips in 2004. At a field heavily infested with SBRM, several (44% of 1,200 live specimens) were found to be infected with a soil-borne pathogen Fusarium solani (Martius) Saccardo (Majumdar et al. 2006). The infectious nature of the isolate was confirmed by multiple artificial inoculations of healthy (Majumdar et al. 2006). The isolate was subsequently accessioned as ARSEF7382 and S2118 at two fungal collection centers (USDA-ARS Fungus Collection Center, Ithaca, NY, and Fusarium Research Center, Penn State University, PA). This common pathogen has several strains or forms that are pathogenic to insects. A F. solani strain is known to be pathogenic to of Anthomyiid flies (Humber 1992). Based on two 15-d bioassays with eight conidial concentrations, the median lethal concentration of ARSEF7382 to SBRM was found to be 1.8 x 10 6 conidia/ml (Majumdar et al. 2006). Transverse sections of infected indicated that the fungus can penetrate the cuticle and grow within SBRM. Pupae in advanced stages can also be killed by ARSEF7382.

According to Gopalakrishnan and Narayanan (1989), F. oxysporum pathogenic strain IMI 318632 caused 100% mortality of guava shield scale insect, Pulvinaria (= Chloropulvinaria) psidii Maskel, when exposed to 4.8 x 10 8 conidia/ml for 5 d. Tanada and Kaya (1993) have suggested that one particular toxin called beauvericin, produced in ample amounts by Fusarium, is especially lethal to Diptera (flies). Thus, our findings are supported by a number of published accounts regarding this fungus. The survey of 2004 also suggested that disease prevalence in SBRM was synchronized with rainfall amounts (Table 1) and host availability. Peak fly activity was recorded on 30 June, 2004, which provided ample time for collection of a large number of from the detection site. Overall, this discovery reiterated that all stages of the root maggot life cycle should be studied in order to have a complete understanding of ecological processes that affect the survival of this key pest of sugarbeet. Table 1. Comparison of climatic conditions during three pathogen surveys, ND, 2004-2006 2004 / 2005 / 2006 St. Thomas APRIL MAY JUNE JULY Soil temperature ( o F) 45 / 46 / 46 54 / 54 / 59 63 / 66 / 73 70 / 75 / 79 Rainfall (inches) 1.7 / 0.7 / 1.0 3.6 / 3.6 / 0.9 0.8 / 5.1 / 0.6 3.5 / 2.5 / 1.3 Forest River APRIL MAY JUNE JULY Soil temperature ( o F) 40 / 46 / 49 51 / 54 / 60 65 / 69 / 72 72 / 74 / 80 Rainfall (inches) 0.8 / 0.9 / 1.1 4.8 / 3.0 / 0.9 0.6 / 6.4 / 0.7 2.2 / 1.4 / 1.8 Source: NDAWN, The North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network, NDSU, Fargo 2005 Survey. This survey was funded by the State Board of Agricultural Research and Education. It was the first intensive insect survey of its kind in the RRV. The objective was to locate natural epizootics of F. solani in SBRM populations and detect additional pathogens. A detailed account of the survey methodology and insect screening procedure were provided by Majumdar et al. (2006), which closely follows a published procedure of handling and diagnosis of insect pathogens (Lacey and Brooks 1997). A total of 2,400 were collected in early July from many fields (Table 2) that were planted to sugarbeet the previous year. Field histories for the survey fields were collected from sugarbeet producers. It appears that potato crops grown prior to sugarbeet can increase the likelihood of finding F. solani-infected SBRM. The low temperatures and high soil moisture that prevailed in June of 2005 appeared to be favorable for Fusarium epizootics in SBRM populations. This finding agrees with published reports of Fusarium epizootics in other insects (Venugopal et al. 1989, Villacaros and Robin 1989, Pandit and Tarannum 2002). The survey data also suggested that high early-season (i.e., May) rainfall amounts favors infection, probably by exposing SBRM to high levels of viable spores; however, the unusually high (5.1 inches) rainfall in June probably reduced the availability of susceptible hosts (Table 1). This resulted in a low (3.8%) overall infection level of 92 infected out of 2,400. Peak fly activity occurred late (22 June) in 2005. This provided ample time to plan and conduct the survey as the insects emerged from the soil. Adverse climatic conditions

(and other abiotic factors) caused mortality of 268, which was equivalent to 11% of sampled (Table 2). Table 2. Fusarium solani epizootics in T. myopaeformis collected in eastern North Dakota, 2005 Townsh ip St. Thomas Lodema Cavalier Collectio n site coordinat es N 48.33, W 97.28 N 48.36, W 97.31 N 48.37, W 97.29 N 48.37, W 97.32 N 48.41, W 97.27 N 48.71, W 97.27 N 48.92, W 97.32 N 48.38, W 97.32 N 48.49, W 97.38 N 48.15, Elevati on (m) Soil temperat ure ( o C) Previo us crop Total collect ed Infect ed Infecti on rate (%) Emergen ce failure (%) 257 20 Potato 740 33 4 7 262 15 Bean 13 1 7 15 262 16 N/A a 70 2 3 36 262 15 Potato 173 1 <1 8 261 17 Bean 153 4 3 3 261 19 N/A a 195 6 3 19 252 16 Potato 346 18 5 12 264 15 Potato 390 23 6 10 265 16 Barley 300 2 <1 14 Forest River W 97.24 N/A a N/A a Bean 20 2 10 35 Total 2400 92 Average 4% 11% a Not Available

2006 Survey. This survey was also funded by the State Board of Agricultural Research and Education. The 2006 sugarbeet growing season was marked by unusually low rainfall during the critical survey month of June. The rainfall received in May (0.9 inch), combined with higher soil temperatures, was adequate to cause rapid development and emergence of SBRM adult flies. Thus, the peak fly activity occurred early (2 June). About 163 flies were trapped per day on sticky stakes at peak fly activity (Boetel et al. in this report). This rapid emergence early in the season affected our ability to survey effectively. As a result, we were able to collect and screen only 517 from over 10 fields spread across five townships. Pertinent data from four townships has been provided in Table 3. No were found at fields near Cavalier and Auburn, ND (not presented). Pupae were hand-collected in the field and maintained under controlled environmental conditions until diagnosis. Screening was conducted within a week of collection to ensure pupal viability. Pupae were surface-sterilized using a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution followed by drying in a gentle stream of compressed air. Pupae were transferred to individual clean plastic soufflé cups containing four to five pieces of sterile moist filter paper to provide high humidity to. After a 15-d incubation period, diseased were microscopically examined to confirm Fusarium infection. Thereafter, diseased were kept on culture media where F. solani forms distinctive colonies. The dry summer months and rapid fly emergence made it challenging to determine survey sites and collect root maggot in dry soil. A total of 27 from 517 collected specimens (= 5.2%) had Fusarium infections. Table 3. Fusarium solani epizootics in T. myopaeformis collected in eastern North Dakota, 2006 Township St. Thomas Nash Forest River Collection site coordinates N 48.36, W 97.31 N 48.36, W 97.30 N 48.33, W 97.28 N 48.29, W 97.33 N 48.28, W 97.22 N 48.17, W 97.21 N 48.15, Elevation (feet) Soil Temperature ( o F) Previous crop Total collected Infected Infection rate (%) Emergence failure (%) 863 60 Potato 29 0 0 27 850 60 Potato 42 4 9 12 826 70 Potato 3 0 0 0 858 72 Potato 377 19 5 34 806 72 Potato 12 2 16 58 802 67 Wheat 51 2 4 14 834 74 N/A a 3 0 0 0 W 97.24 Total 517 27 Average 5% 30% a Not Available Surprisingly, 31 larvae were collected after the peak fly activity. Many larvae were collected from a field site near Nash, ND. A high number of (154 of 517 samples or about 30%) died from unknown reasons. High soil temperatures and low moisture levels likely affected

pupal development. It is also probable that prevalence of F. solani was low throughout the RRV in 2006 due to low rainfall amounts (i.e., dry soil conditions) during May and June. Conclusions The survey points out many important aspects about fungus activity and SBRM biology. The abundance of root maggots makes them a likely target for natural enemies, such as soil microorganisms. Coevolution of native pathogens exposed to SBRM (a native pest) could be a probable reason for the development of specialized pathogen strains, such as ARSEF7382, that are aggressive decimators of root maggot populations under suitable conditions. Epizootics of insect-pathogenic fungi are favored by rainfall. There is a lag period between rainfall and disease development. High soil moisture could increase inoculum levels of the pathogen and aid in persistence of the fungal spores. Laboratory studies indicate F. solani spores to be highly germinative on artificial media. Availability of a healthy host population is important for successful natural epizootics and their detection during surveys. Asynchrony between SBRM and F. solani, triggered by climatic variations as seen in the surveys, may result in low or undetectable levels of infection. Effects of cultural practices on SBRM pathogens have not been documented. This study provides evidence regarding the buildup of fungus inoculum in relation to crop rotation. Sublethal effects of Fusarium infection on the survival and reproductive biology of SBRM adults is a topic for further research. Pathogenicity of the isolate toward larvae and adult flies also needs to be assessed. Molecular techniques could be used in future for rapid identification of Fusarium strains (Hennequin et al. 1999). This could pave the way for genetic characterization of insecticidal components produced by this fungus. Area-wide surveys should continue in order to discover more potential antagonists of the SBRM. Acknowledgements Thanks are extended to V. R. Panavala and R. Gooduru for assistance with collecting and screening SBRM. Grants from the North Dakota State Board of Agricultural Research and Education (SBARE) supported much of this work. References cited Gopalakrishnan, C., and K. Narayanan. 1989. Occurrence of Fusarium oxysporum Schlecht and its pathogenicity on guava scale Chloropulvinaria psidii Maskell (Hemiptera: Coccidae). Curr. Sci. 58: 92 94. Hennequin, C., E. Abachin, F. Symoens, L. Lavarde, C. Reboux, N. Nolard, and P. Berche. 1999. Identification of Fusarium species involved in human infections by 28SrRNA gene sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 3586 3589. Humber, R. A. 1992. Collection of Entomopathogenic Fungal Cultures: Catalog of Strains, 1992. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bulletin ARS-110.

Lacey, L. A., and W. M. Brooks. 1997. Initial handling and diagnosis of diseased insects, pp. 1 15. In L. A. Lacey (ed.), Manual of techniques in insect pathology. Academic Press, San Diego. Majumdar, A., M. A. Boetel, and R. J. Dregseth. 2006. Survey, isolation, and screening for native pathogens of sugarbeet root maggot (Diptera: Ulidiidae). 2005 Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports. Coop. Ext. Serv. North Dakota State University. 36: 228 231. NDAWN Center. 2006. North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network. Department of Soil Science, North Dakota State University, ND. Website: http://www.ndawn.ndsu.nodak.edu/ (5 January, 2007). Pandit, N. C., and Z. Tarannum. 2002. Record of fungi associated with diseased insects of jute and mesta crop. J. Entomol. Res. 26: 175 178. Tanada, Y., and H. K. Kaya. 1993. Insect Pathology. Academic Press, San Diego. Venugopal Rao, N., A. S. Reddy, and K. Tirumala Rao. 1989. Natural enemies of cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius, in relation to host populations and weather factors. J. Biol. Control. 3: 10 12. Villacarlos, L. T. and R. P. Robin. 1989. Entomogenous fungi infecting Heteropsylla cubana Crawford (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Leyte, Philippines. Trop. Pest Management. 35: 120 122.