Voriconazole Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version March 2010

Similar documents
Micafungin and Candida spp. Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Version February 2013

Mupirocin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th July 2010

Cefotaxime Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Cefuroxime iv Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version th September 2010

Antifungal susceptibility testing: Which method and when?

EUCAST-AFST Available breakpoints 2012

Update zu EUCAST 2012 Cornelia Lass-Flörl

Antifungal Pharmacodynamics A Strategy to Optimize Efficacy

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

(and breakpoint table, MIC and. by author. ESCMID Online Lecture Library. conventions) ECCMID 2011, Milan

The CLSI Approach to Setting Breakpoints

An Update in the Management of Candidiasis

CD101: A Novel Echinocandin

Voriconazole. Voriconazole VRCZ ITCZ

SCMID Online Lecture Library. by author. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy in the elderly. Dose Finding - The Past

Basic Concepts of PK/PD -pharmacodynamic indices- Johan W. Mouton MD PhD FIDSA Professor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodymamics

Optimizing antifungal dosing regimens. Joseph Meletiadis, PhD, FECMM Assistant Professor of Microbiology

CURRENT AND NEWER ANTI-FUNGAL THERAPIES- MECHANISMS, INDICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND PROBLEMS. Dr AMIT RAODEO DM SEMINAR

Disclosures. Efficacy of the drug. Optimizing Dosing Based on PKPD- An overview. Dose Finding - The Past

Interpretive Breakpoints for Fluconazole and Candida Revisited: a Blueprint for the Future of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Antifungal Resistance in Asia: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Consequences

Antifungal Pharmacotherapy

APX001 A novel broad spectrum antifungal agent in development for the treatment of invasive fungal infections

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 November 2006

In vitro cross-resistance between azoles in Aspergillus fumigatus: a reason for concern in the clinic?

Antifungal Stewardship. Önder Ergönül, MD, MPH Koç University, School of Medicine, Istanbul 6 October 2017, ESGAP course, Istanbul

Received 26 July 2006/Returned for modification 10 October 2006/Accepted 16 October 2006

Isolates from a Phase 3 Clinical Trial. of Medicine and College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, Wayne, Pennsylvania ,

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

anidulafungin 100mg powder and solvent for concentrate for solution for infusion (Ecalta ) No. (465/08) Pfizer Ltd

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology

Oslo meeting May 21st 2014

Micafungin, a new Echinocandin: Pediatric Development

Reducing the antifungal drugs consumption in the ICU

Echinocandin Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates Collected during a 1-Year Period in Sweden

Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in a critically ill patient with liver cirrhosis

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Antifungal Therapy. Why, When and How

9/7/2018. Faculty. Overcoming Challenges in the Management of Invasive Fungal Infections. Learning Objectives. Faculty Disclosure

Correlation of the MIC and Dose/MIC ratio of. fluconazole to the therapeutic response of patients with ACCEPTED

1* 1. Vijaya S. Rajmane, Shivaji T. Mohite

Table 1. Antifungal Breakpoints for Candida. 2,3. Agent S SDD or I R. Fluconazole < 8.0 mg/ml mg/ml. > 64 mg/ml.

SCY-078 ECMM Symposium Cologne, Germany October 2017

on December 9, 2018 by guest

%T MIC MIC. Pharmacokinetics PK: Cmax AUC T1/2 Pharmacodynamics PD: MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration time-killing-curve 1990.

Johan W. Mouton MD PhD FIDSA Professor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Correlation of the MIC and Dose/MIC Ratio of Fluconazole to the Therapeutic Response of Patients with Mucosal Candidiasis and Candidemia

MANAGEMENT OF HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED FUNGAL INFECTIONS

Section 5.2: Pharmacokinetic properties

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Echinocandin Antifungal Drugs in Fungal Infections

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Summary of Product Characteristics

EUCAST breakpoints. Paul M. Tulkens. Representative of ISC to EUCAST ( ) Member of the EUCAST steering committee ( )

Evidence-Based Approaches to the Safe and Effective Management of Invasive Fungal Infections. Presenter. Disclosures

Received 22 November 2007/Returned for modification 29 December 2007/Accepted 12 January 2008

Pharmacologyonline 1: (2010) ewsletter Singh and Kochbar. Optimizing Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamics Principles & Role of

What is new in EUCAST South Africa, May, Gunnar Kahlmeter EUCAST Technical Data Coordinator and Webmaster Sweden

I am against to TDM in critically ill patient

Vancomycin Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version June 2010

Antimykotische Therapie und TDM: ECIL 6 Guidelines

Updated Guidelines for Management of Candidiasis. Vidya Sankar, DMD, MHS April 6, 2017

Received 12 December 2010/Returned for modification 5 January 2011/Accepted 16 March 2011

Received 31 March 2009/Returned for modification 26 May 2009/Accepted 22 June 2009

ADEQUATE ANTIFUNGAL USE FOR BLOODSTREAM INFECTIONS

Antifungal Treatment in Neonates

The Evolving Role of Antifungal Susceptibility Testing. Gregory A. Eschenauer and Peggy L. Carver

How To Use PK/PD Of Antifungal Drugs In Clinical Practice?

Estimation of In Vitro Susceptibility Breakpoints for Tigecycline Against Staphylococcus aureus

Condition First line Alternative Comments Candidemia Nonneutropenic adults

1. Pre-emptive therapy. colonization, colonization, pre-emptive therapy. , ICU colonization. colonization. 2, C. albicans

Received 4 August 2010/Returned for modification 23 October 2010/Accepted 19 November 2010

Antifungal Update. Candida: In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

Voriconazole 200 mg powder for solution for infusion 03 Jun version 3.0 PUBLIC SUMMARY OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

Antimykotische Therapie und TDM: ECIL 6 Guidelines

Efficacy of a Novel Echinocandin, CD101, in a Mouse Model of Azole-Resistant Disseminated Candidiasis

About the Editor Gerri S. Hall, Ph.D.

EUCAST Frequently Asked Questions. by author. Rafael Cantón Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain EUCAST Clinical Data Coordinator

Use of Antifungal Drugs in the Year 2006"

Clinical relevance of resistance in Aspergillus. David W. Denning University Hospital of South Manchester [Wythenshawe Hospital]

NEW ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS IN 2003 : SPECTRUM AND INDICATIONS. 20th Symposium (spring 2003) Thursday May 22nd 2003

Doripenem: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Paul M. Tulkens, MD, PhD Françoise Van Bambeke, PharmD, PhD

Rezafungin: A Novel Echinocandin. Taylor Sandison, MD MPH Chief Medical Officer ISHAM- Amsterdam July 2, 2018

Fungi GUIDE TO INFECTION CONTROL IN THE HOSPITAL CHAPTER NUMBER 53: Author Moi Lin Ling, MBBS, FRCPA, CPHQ, MBA

Antifungal Drug Resistance: a Cause for Concern?

Use of Antifungals in the Year 2008

Antifungal Update 2/22/12. Which is the most appropriate initial empirical therapy in a candidemic patient?

Pharmacodynamic indices in targeting therapy of critical infections

Updates and practical guide on antifungal agents

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE. Opinion. 5 March 2008

Candida albicans 426 (64.0 ) C. albicans non-albicans

Antifungal therapy in children. Adilia Warris MD PhD FRCPCH Clinical Reader Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialist

Antifungals in Invasive Fungal Infections: Antifungals in neutropenic patients

The incidence of invasive fungal infections

Title: Author: Speciality / Division: Directorate:

Received 18 December 2008/Returned for modification 9 February 2009/Accepted 9 April 2009

Consultation on the Revision of Carbapenem Breakpoints

Antifungal Update 2/24/11. Which is the most appropriate initial empirical therapy in a candidemic patient?

VRCZ VRCZ VRCZ μg/ml

1 Guidelines for the Management of Candidaemia

Transcription:

Voriconazole Rationale for the EUCAST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 20 March 2010 Foreword EUCAST The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) is organised by the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), and the active national antimicrobial breakpoint committees in Europe. EUCAST was established by ESCMID in 1997, was restructured in 2001-2002 and has been in operation in its current form since 2002. The current remit of EUCAST is to harmonise clinical breakpoints for existing drugs in Europe, to determine clinical breakpoints for new drugs, to set epidemiological (microbiological) breakpoints, to revise breakpoints as required, to harmonise methodology for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, to develop a website with MIC and zone diameter distributions of antimicrobial agents for a wide range of organisms and to liaise with European governmental agencies and European networks involved with antimicrobial resistance and resistance surveillance. Information on EUCAST and EUCAST breakpoints is available on the EUCAST website at http://www.eucast.org. EUCAST rationale documents EUCAST rationale documents summarise the information on which the EUCAST clinical breakpoints are based. Availability of EUCAST document All EUCAST documents are freely available from the EUCAST website at http://www.eucast.org. Citation of EUCAST documents This rationale document should be cited as: European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Voriconazole: Rationale for the clinical breakpoints, version 2.0, 2010. http://www.eucast.org. Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 1 of 13

Introduction Voriconazole is an azole antifungal agent active against Candida species, Cryptococcus species, Aspergillus species, Scedosporium apiospermum and other less common pathogens. The approved indications in Europe are the following: (i) Treatment of invasive aspergillosis; (ii) candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients; (iii) serious invasive candidosis due to fluconazole-resistant Candida species (including C. krusei); (iv) serious invasive fungal disease caused by Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium spp. The activity in vitro of voriconazole against species of Candida is not uniform. The species most frequently involved in causing human infections include C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata and C. krusei, all of which usually exhibit MICs of less than 1 mg/l for voriconazole. However the MICs of voriconazole for fluconazole-resistant isolates are proportionally higher than are those of fluconazole-susceptible isolates. Therefore, every attempt should be made to identify Candida to species level. The EUCAST-AFST (European Committee on Antimicrobial susceptibility Testing Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing) has determined breakpoints for voriconazole for Candida species. The tentative breakpoints set two years ago are confirmed except that C. krusei is listed as insufficient evidence (IE) rather than inappropriate target (-). Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 2 of 13

1. Dosage Austria Finland Germany France Greece Norway Denmark Italy The Netherlands Spain Sweden Switzerland Turkey UK Most common dose IV (mg/kg/day) Oral (mg/day in >40 kg) Oral (mg/day in <40 kg) 1 st day 12 12 12 12 12 2 nd day 8 8 8 8 8 1 st day 800 800 800 800 800 2 nd day 400 400 400 400 400 1 st day 400 400 400 400 400 2 nd day 200 200 200 200 200 Maximum dose IV (mg/kg/day) NR NR NR Oral (mg/day) Available formulations Tablets, oral suspension, iv >40 kg = 600 <40 kg = 300 Tablets, oral suspension, iv NR Tablets, oral suspension, iv >40 kg: 600 <40 kg: 300 Tablets, IV NR but normally 600 Tablets, oral suspension, iv NR = No recommendation Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 3 of 13

2. MIC distributions and epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values (mg/l) 0.002 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.032 0.064 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 ECOFF (mg/l) Candida albicans 50 996 5139 5235 1107 530 207 106 63 42 18 13 18 22 78 6 0.125 Candida glabrata 0 5 26 63 192 534 1218 1244 781 341 196 139 69 20 2 6 1 Candida krusei 0 0 2 10 23 29 152 489 424 119 30 10 1 0 0 0 1 Candida parapsilosis 0 6 287 1326 510 197 123 77 23 16 3 2 1 0 0 0 0.125 Candida tropicalis 0 28 133 602 934 732 274 113 51 32 8 2 10 20 16 3 0.125 The table includes MIC distributions available at the time breakpoints were set. They represent combined distributions from multiple sources and time periods and are based on MIC values determined with EUCAST, CLSI and Etest methodology. The distributions are used to define the epidemiological cut-offs (ECOFF) and give an indication of the MICs for organisms with acquired or mutational resistance mechanisms. They should not be used to infer resistance rates. Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 4 of 13

3. Breakpoints prior to harmonisation (mg/l) S</R> General breakpoints Species related breakpoints European breakpoints CLSI 1 NA 1/2 NA NA NA = Not available 1 CLSI breakpoints converted to European terminology. CLSI states that isolates exhibiting a MIC of voriconazole of 2 mg/l are considered susceptible dependent upon dose (S-DD). CLSI takes into account the nonlinear pharmacokinetics and the dosing flexibility of voriconazole. The S-DD category implies that an infection caused by an isolate with such a MIC may be appropriately treated in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated or when a high dose of the drug can be used. In addition, this category may also serve as a buffer zone to prevent small, uncontrolled technical factors. Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 5 of 13

4. Pharmacokinetics Dosage 6 mg/kg iv x 2 on day 1; maintenance dose 4 mg/kg x 2 Steady state in patients with venous haemofiltration 400 mg oral x 2 on day 1; maintenance dose 200 mg x 2 Cmax (mg/l) 5.9 ± 2.9 2-2.3 Cmin (mg/l) 1.1 ± 0.3 NA Total body clearance (L/h) 12.9 ± 6.7 19.9 T ½ (h), mean (range) 6 6 AUC 24h (mg.h/l) 44.8 18-22 Fraction unbound (%) 42 42 Volume of distribution (L/kg) 4.6 NA NA not available. Comments Pks of voriconazole are non-linear and are likely due to saturation of its metabolism with respect to dose. The variability in plasma concentrations and systemic exposure varies >100-fold between subjects (based on trough concentrations), depending partly on the respective genotype of the hepatic cytochrome P450. CYP2C19 exhibits genetic polymorphism resulting in an approximately 4-fold higher exposure for poor metabolisers than for extensive metabolisers. The coefficient of variation of the AUC has been estimated to be 74-100%. References Theuretzbacher et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2006; 45: 649-663 Purkins et al. AAC. 2002; 46: 2546-2553 Fuhrmann et al. JAC. 2007; 60: 1085-1090 Denning et al. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 563-571 Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 6 of 13

5. Pharmacodynamics Candida spp fauc/mic for achieving ED50 1 24 ± 17 fauc/mic for 2 log reduction in 24 h 75-100 fauc/mic from clinical data (CART) Comments 1 fauc/mic for achieving ED50 is the mean fauc/mic equivalent to ED50 in mg/kg/24h. ED50 is the dose required to achieve 50% of Emax after 24 h of treatment. Emax is the change in the Log 10 number of CFU per kidney compared with the value of untreated controls after 24 h of treatment. fauc/mic for achieving ED50 gave a reduction of around 1.5 log 10 CFU per kidney after 24 h of treatment. References Andes et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47: 3165-3169 Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 7 of 13

6. Monte Carlo simulations and Pk/Pd breakpoints Probabilities of Target Attainment (PTA) for 4 mg/kg x 2 iv in steady state are shown in figure 1. Probabilities of Target Attainment for 200 mg x 2 oral in steady state are shown in figure 2. Voriconazole, 4 mg/kg x2 iv Figure 1. Probabilities of Target Attainment for voriconazole at 4 mg/kg x 2 iv in steady state. fauc/mic 100 95% percentile 99% percentile Mean The following pharmacokinetic parameters were used to obtain the PTA: Area under curve (AUC) 50 mg h/l, CV 25% Fraction unbound (Fu): 42% 10 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 MIC mg/l Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 8 of 13

Voriconazole 200 mg x 2 oral Figure 2. Probabilities of Target Attainment for voriconazole at 200 mg x 2 oral in steady state. fauc/mic 100 95% percentile 99% percentile Mean The following pharmacokinetic parameters were used to obtain the PTA: Area under curve (AUC): 25 mg h/l, CV 30% Fraction unbound: 42% 10 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 MIC mg/l Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 9 of 13

7. Clinical data Clinical data have been obtained from studies 608 (Global Candidemia Study), 603 (Empirical Therapy Study), 309/604 (Global Rare and Refractory Studies), 301 (Compassionate Use Protocol), and 606 (Emergency Use Protocol-U.S. and Canada). Voriconazole was administered intravenously with a loading dose of 6 mg/kg every 12 h for the first 24 h, followed by either 3 mg/kg (studies 603 and 608) or 4 mg/kg every 12 h for 3 days, after which patients were given 200 mg oral every 12h. If oral therapy was administered initially, a loading dose of 400 mg every 12 h on day 1 was followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg twice daily thereafter. The response to voriconazole therapy was determined by the investigator at the end of therapy as either cure, improvement, which were deemed a success or failure. Clinical outcomes at the end of therapy were compared with the MIC of voriconazole for each Candida isolated at baseline, i.e. before treatment. MICs were determined using CLSI M27 A2 methodology. Geometric mean MICs and global response for different Candida species were as follows: Species No. isolates Geometric mean MIC (mg/l) % response C. albicans 96 0.0164 72 C. tropicalis 51 0.1283 73 C. glabrata 47 0.7937 55 C. parapsilosis 34 0.0266 85 Candida spp 12 0.0712 92 C. krusei 9 0.3650 78 The response was above 72% for infections caused by every species except C. glabrata where the percentage response was only 55%. Geometric MICs were below 0.25 mg/l except for C. glabrata and C. krusei. CART analysis of response versus MIC or Log2MIC yielded an MIC value that allowed discrimination between successes and failures. However, the statistical support for this classification tree was limited as the relative error for the best tree was 0.78, the relative risk was 1.09 and the area under ROC curve was 0.6 with a true positive rate of 78% but a false positive rate exceeding 50%. CART analysis was made separately for infections due to C. glabrata because of the lower response rate. CART analysis of outcome versus MIC was unable to produce an interpretable classification tree of MIC values versus successes and failures. Reference: Pfaller et al. JCM. 2006; 44: 819-826 In summary, the data at hand support breakpoints that will categorise wild type Candida albicans, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis susceptible to voriconazole. However, beyond that there is poor statistical support for any clinical correlation between outcome and MIC. Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 10 of 13

8. Clinical breakpoints Non-species-related breakpoints Non-species related breakpoints are determined mainly on the basis of Pk/Pd data and are independent of MIC distributions of specific species. They are for use only for species not mentioned in the table or footnotes. In the case of voriconazole, the pharmacokinetics are variable and clinical data for species other than C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis and for isolates with higher MICs are scarce. EUCAST has therefore refrained from determining non-species related breakpoints for voriconazole. A clinical response of 76% was achieved in infections caused by the species listed below when MICs were lower than or equal to the epidemiological cut-offs. Therefore, we considered wild type populations of C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis as susceptible. There is not enough information available for the response to voriconazole of infections caused by Candida isolates with higher MICs. Monte Carlo simulations showed that a target attainment of 24 would encompass more than 99% of the population for an MIC of 0.125 mg/l. Species-related breakpoints C. albicans S 0.125 mg/l, R>0.125 C. tropicalis S 0.125 mg/l, R>0.125 C. parapsilosis S 0.125 mg/l, R>0.125 Strains with MIC values above the S/I breakpoint are rare. The identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of any such isolate must be repeated and, if the result is confirmed, the isolate should be sent to a reference laboratory. Isolates with an MIC above the current resistant breakpoint should be reported resistant until evidence has accumulated regarding the clinical response of infections due to such isolates. Species without breakpoints A 21% lower response to voriconazole in invasive candidosis caused by C glabrata has been shown in clinical studies when compared to the response in infections caused by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. CART analysis of outcome versus MIC did not find higher MICs to be the variable causing this reduced response so higher MICs were not the explanation for the lower response. Consequently, there is currently insufficient evidence to set clinical breakpoints for C. glabrata. The apparent clinical response in infections caused by C. krusei is similar to that in infections caused by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis. However, as there were only 9 cases available for analysis, there is currently insufficient evidence to set clinical breakpoints for C. krusei. Clinical qualifications The EUCAST-AFST considers voriconazole appropriate therapy for the following Candida infections when caused by wild type C. albicans, C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis: Candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients Invasive candidosis Oesophageal candidosis Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 11 of 13

Dosage Breakpoints apply to: (i) an intravenous dose of 12 mg/kg on day 1 and then 8 mg/kg/day (ii) an oral dose of 800 mg on day 1 and then 400 mg/day for people weighing > 40 kg, and; (iii) an oral dose of 400 on day 1 and then 200 mg/day for people weighing <40 kg. Additional comment The pharmacokinetics of voriconazole are highly variable. Although, limited information is available, it has been shown that there is a decrease in the response of patients when voriconazole trough blood levels are below 1 mg/l. Conversely, voriconazole trough blood levels above 5.5 mg/l have been associated with an increase in toxicity (Pascual et al. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46:201-211). Others report a favourable response when random voriconazole blood concentrations exceed 2.05 mg/l (Smith et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 1570-1572).This suggests a potential role for monitoring voriconazole blood concentrations, though there are not enough data to show whether there is a better response when voriconazole trough levels are above 1 mg/l. The EUCAST AFST will review breakpoints for voriconazole when there are more data available for Candida species which were not assigned breakpoints during the present review, when there are clinical data for Candida isolates with MIC values outside the wild type distribution or when there are data to more closely define therapeutic and toxic levels of voriconazole. Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 12 of 13

9. Voriconazole - EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints These can be found at http://www.eucast.org 10. Exceptions noted for individual national committees None Voriconazole: Rationale for the EUCAST-AFST clinical breakpoints, version 2.0 Page 13 of 13