MANUAL FOR THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM OF EARLY STUTTERING INTERVENTION 2008 CONTENTS

Similar documents
THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM OF EARLY STUTTERING INTERVENTION TREATMENT MANUAL

2. Index of Dear Sue and Just Explain That Again Topics from Lidcombe News

Introduction 11/24/09. Objectives of this presentation. Troubleshooting with the Lidcombe Program for Stuttering ASHA Convention 2009 New Orleans, USA

The image part with relationship ID rid3 was not found in the file. Susan Cochrane, M.A., CCC SLP, BRFS Sheryl R. Gottwald, Ph.D.

THE CAMPERDOWN PROGRAM STUTTERING TREATMENT GUIDE

The Camperdown Program for Stuttering: Treatment Manual. Sue O Brian, Brenda Carey, Mark Onslow, Ann Packman and Angela Cream.

The Pre-School Child Who Stutters

The Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide

Stuttering Management Treatment Ideas for Preschoolers to Adults. Tom Gurrister MS-CCC SLP, BRFS Maria Gurrister MS-CCC SLP

The Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide

Contributions to Mary Kingston. Send your ideas and questions to:

Therapy for Preschool and School Age Children who Stutter

Innovative Tools for Treating Stuttering

Julie Bolton M.Cl.Sc (SLP) Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Critical Review: The Effects of Self-Imposed Time-Out from Speaking on Stuttering in Adolescents and Adults Who Stutter

An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention Mark A. Jones

The Internet Lidcombe Program

Establishing long-term fluency goals when working with adults who stutter

Cite this article as: BMJ, doi: /bmj e0 (published 11 August 2005)

Voice. What is voice? Why is voice important?

Theories, Treatment, and Ways to Promote Fluency of Speech at Home

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Stuttering. Risk factors that predict a chronic problem rather than spontaneous recovery include:

Autism Strategies Background

Autism Spectrum Disorders: An update on research and clinical practices for SLPs

Supporting Children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. An Introduction for Health and Social Care Practitioners

Speech disfluencies of preschool-age children who do and do not stutter

Treating Cluttered Speech in a Child with Autism: Case Study

Involving people with autism: a guide for public authorities

copyrighted material by PRO-ED, Inc.

(p) (f) Echolalia. What is it, and how to help your child with Echolalia?

The Core Elements of Applied Verbal Behaviour AVB. Dr. Chafica Mansour Gharbieh Education & ABA/VB Specialist

Helping Stutterers. who stutters, you understand

Patient and Public Involvement in JPND Research

Quick guide to autism

Contents. Pages 1-2 Lidcombe Link Days and Courses. Pages 3-6 Case Study 1 by Kate Morley. Pages 7-8 Sue O Brian s Problem Solving Checklist

Deciding whether a person has the capacity to make a decision the Mental Capacity Act 2005

Improving Communication in Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) Eniola Lahanmi Speech & Language Therapist

Publications for Susan O'Brian

9/29/2017. Stuttering Therapy Workshop. Objectives today: Holistic Treatment. Data collection

PROTECTING COMMUNITY STAFF FROM EXPOSURE TO SECONDHAND SMOKE

The use of the Lidcombe Program in treating Stuttering among Saudi Children. Introduction ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract

SPORT PSYCHOLOGY. Effective Communication and Dealing with Athletes with Low Self-Esteem

Education Options for Children with Autism

A Guide for Families, Friends and Carers

Auditory Processing. Teach Inclusive Chapter 4, March Catherine Silcock, Speech Pathologist

Attention and Concentration Problems Following Traumatic Brain Injury. Patient Information Booklet. Talis Consulting Limited

Youth Advisory Group Member. Community Engagement Officer. Level 1, 360 Burwood Road, Hawthorn VIC 3122

Integration of Language and Fluency Treatment in a Day-Camp Setting. Ginger Collins & Paul Hoffman Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA

An Introduction to the CBS Health Cognitive Assessment

Paediatric Clinical Assessment for a possible Autism Spectrum Disorder

Guidelines for the Westmead PTA scale

Behavior Consultation

Learning Activity 1 Review questions

NAMI California Peer-to-Peer Mentor Training Application

Myers/Briggs Personality, Inventory Description in Workplace Communication

Bringing Your A Game: Strategies to Support Students with Autism Communication Strategies. Ann N. Garfinkle, PhD Benjamin Chu, Doctoral Candidate

Practitioner Guidelines for Enhanced IMR for COD Handout #2: Practical Facts About Mental Illness

Aspect Positive Behaviour Support

Look back at the prediction you made about what would happen in act 3. Discuss with the person next to you what you think will happen.

The Experience of People Who Stutter

PLANNING THE RESEARCH PROJECT

New Mexico TEAM Professional Development Module: Deaf-blindness

Dr. Jóhanna Einarsdóttir

Full file at

IMAGINETS. Toy/Software Analysis

CHINO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT INSTRUCTIONAL GUIDE AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE 1

Towson University Center for Adults with Autism Towson, MD Adventure Pursuits for Adults with Autism

ESDM Early Start Denver Model Parent Coaching P-ESDM

Queensmill School Policy guidance on strategies to reduce pupils stress

12/19/2016. Autism Spectrum Disorders & Positive Behavior Supports a brief overview. What is the Autism Spectrum? Autism Spectrum Disorder

Autism Spectrum Disorders & Positive Behavior Supports a brief overview

Stages of Change The Cognitive Factors Underlying Readiness to Manage Stuttering:Evidence from Adolescents. What Do We Mean by Motivation?

The KEYHOLE Early Intervention Programme in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Booklet 4. Interaction. Facebook: /AutismNI

There are often questions and, sometimes, confusion when looking at services to a child who is deaf or hard of hearing. Because very young children

Autism and Communication

Professional learning: Helping children who are experiencing mental health difficulties Topic 1: Understanding mental health. Leadership team guide

How To Overcome Stuttering: Learn To Speak Fluently, Speak Without Fear & Get Rid Of Stutter For Life By Jacob Marriot READ ONLINE

OVERCOMING YOUR CHILD S FEARS AND WORRIES GUIDANCE FOR PARENTS

Running head: CSP BOOK REVIEW 1

PST-PC Appendix. Introducing PST-PC to the Patient in Session 1. Checklist

INQUISITIVE TEACHER. A Peer Reviewed Refereed Biannual Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Researches Vol. II, Issue II, December 2015, pp.

Higher National Unit specification. General information. Exercise Principles and Programming. Unit code: H4TC 34. Unit purpose.

DATA Model Skills Checklist: Curriculum Crosswalk

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Journal of Fluency Disorders xxx (2010) xxx xxx

Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network. Behaviour and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS) - 32

Substance use and misuse

Sound is the. spice of life

Sheryl R. Gottwald, Ph.D., CCC-SLP University of New Hampshire Charlie Osborne, M.A., CCC-SLP University of Wisconsin

Webinars with ECFS. Be a Communicative Partner: It s the Gateway to Learning March 18, :00 p.m. EST

EDUCATION BULLETIN / INFLUENZA A (H1N1)

Cambridgeshire Training, Education and Development Older People (CAMTED-OP)

Contents. 2. What is Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder? How do I recognise Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder? 7

6/16/2011. Making Eye Gaze Technology a Reality: The Road from Trials to Conversations. My Background. Eye Gaze Technology

Welcome to ISTAR s Communication Improvement Program. CIP Information Package Contents

Trainer Assessment Report Guidelines (TARG) 2019 Approved : December Contents

Observation and Assessment. Narratives

Australian Sonographer Accreditation Registry (ASAR) Policy & Procedure 9 - Annual Reporting Requirements for Accredited Sonography Courses

PSHE: Personal wellbeing

Critical Review: Using Video Modelling to Teach Verbal Social Communication Skills to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Transcription:

MANUAL FOR THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM OF EARLY STUTTERING INTERVENTION 2008 CONTENTS PART ONE: OVERVIEW OF THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM... 2 PART TWO: ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM... 3 Parental Verbal Contingencies...3 Measurement of Stuttering...4 Weekly Clinic Visits...5 Treatment in Structured and Unstructured Conversations...5 Programmed Maintenance...6 PART THREE: PROCEDURES IN THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM... 6 Evaluation...6 Stage 1...7 Stage 2...9 PART FOUR: INDIVIDUALISING THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM... 9 Age of the Child...9 Stuttering Severity...10 Basic Behaviour...10 Personality of the Child and the Parent...11 Family Circumstances...11 APPENDIX (Clinical measures for two children)... 12

PART ONE OVERVIEW OF THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM The Lidcombe Program is a behavioural treatment for stuttering in preschool-age children. In this program, a parent or some other significant person in the child's life delivers the treatment in the child's everyday environment. The parent learns how to do this during weekly visits with the child to the speech clinic. During these visits, the speech pathologist trains the parent to do the treatment and to make daily measurements of the child s stuttering severity. The parent s measures, along with those made by the speech pathologist during the clinic visits, guide the conduct of the program. At these weekly clinic visits the speech pathologist also monitors and adjusts the treatment, and ensures that it is a positive and enjoyable experience for the child. The program is conducted in two stages. During Stage 1, the parent and child attend the speech clinic once a week and the parent does the treatment each day in the child s everyday environment. When the child s stuttering reaches a very low level, the second stage commences. During Stage 2, the parent does the treatment less frequently and the child and parent attend the clinic less frequently, over a period of months or years, providing that the low level of stuttering attained at the end of Stage 1 is maintained. The Lidcombe Program has a number of essential components. However, the implementation of these components is individualised for each child. The program is based on operant methodology and children are not taught to use a different speech pattern, such as slowing down. Nor are parents instructed to alter the child s environment with the aim of facilitating fluency. However, parents may adjust the family routine or change certain aspects of their interactive style during structured treatment conversations, when this is thought necessary for the successful implementation of the program. The Lidcombe Program has been developed as a joint project of the Australian Stuttering Research Centre, and the Discipline of Speech Pathology at The University of Sydney, and the Stuttering Unit, Bankstown Health Service, Sydney. Ongoing research suggests that the program will be modified in the future, in which case this manual will be revised again. The first edition of this manual was written in 2001. Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 2

This manual operationalises only the basic procedures of the Lidcombe Program. It is published in this format primarily as a resource to be used by clinical researchers. Speech pathologists who are considering conducting the Lidcombe Program are advised to add to their knowledge of the Lidcombe Program by also reading the numerous publications which provide more detailed information about the program and the research that underpins it. The Lidcombe Program has been written about and researched extensively. Many of these publications, including clinical trials and other clinical research dealing with the treatment, are listed at the Publications page of the website of the Australian Stuttering Research Centre (ASRC) (http://www.fhs.usyd.edu.au/asrc). The program is examined in detail in the book The Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: A Clinician s Guide. This can be ordered from the ASRC website. The website also provides details about a program of Continuing Professional Education in Stuttering (CPES) which includes workshops on the Lidcombe Program. Speech pathologists are advised to participate in a Continuing Professional Education program before using the Lidcombe Program. There is an international Lidcombe Program Trainers Consortium, involving several countries, which is described on the Professional Education page of the ASRC website (follow the link to the Lidcombe Program Trainers Consortium ). PART TWO ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM Parental Verbal Contingencies In delivering treatment, the parent comments after periods of stutter-free speech and after instances of unambiguous stuttering. After stutter-free speech, the parent may (1) acknowledge this response (e.g. That was smooth ), or (2) praise the response (e.g. That was good talking ), or (3) request the child to evaluate the response (e.g. Was that smooth? ). After stuttering, the parent may (1) acknowledge the response (e.g. That was a bit bumpy ) or (2) request the child to correct the response (e.g. Can you try that again? ). Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 3

Verbal contingencies should be given as soon as possible after the response (stutterfree speech or unambiguous stuttering) and in such a way that the child hears them. In the case of acknowledging the response of unambiguous stuttering, the parent uses a neutral and non-punitive tone of voice. The ratio of verbal contingencies for stutter-free speech to verbal contingencies for stuttering is determined by the clinician and parent, as appropriate for each individual child. However, in order to ensure that the Lidcombe Program is a positive experience for the child, most of the parent s verbal contingencies are for the child s stutter-free speech rather than for stuttering. The parental verbal contingencies given above are examples only, and parents are encouraged to vary the phrases they use. It is important, also, that type and frequency of verbal contingencies are individualised for each child (see PART FOUR). The child s responses and the corresponding parental verbal contingencies that are essential in the Lidcombe Program are summarised in the diagram below. Stutter-Free Speech Unambiguous Stuttering Praise Request Acknowledge Request Self Evaluation Self Correction The parent may also give verbal contingencies when the child spontaneously and correctly evaluates stutter-free speech (such as when the child says, Hey, that was good talking wasn t it? ), or when the child spontaneously corrects a stutter. However, these responses are not considered essential in the program. Measurement of Stuttering The speech pathologist measures percent syllables stuttered (%SS) at the start of each clinic visit, using a dual-button electronic counter. This measure is based on a Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 4

conversational speech sample that typically is a minimum of 300 syllables or 10 minutes duration. The parent is trained to rate the severity of the child s stuttering. The ratings are done with a 10-point severity rating (SR) scale, where 1= no stuttering, 2 = extremely mild stuttering, and 10 = extremely severe stuttering. That is, each day the parent assigns a SR score from 1-10 for the child s stuttering for that day, either for the whole day or for a particular speaking situation that occurred on that day, such as at dinner time. When individual speaking situations are used, a different situation is selected for each day of the week. For example, dinner time is selected for Mondays, bath time is selected for Tuesdays, and so on. Parents start to learn how to make severity ratings during the first weekly clinic visit. Agreement between the parent and the speech pathologist is established in the clinic. After making the %SS measure, the speech pathologist also gives a SR score for the speech sample and asks the parent to do the same. The speech pathologist and the parent compare their scores and discuss any discrepancies. Comparing and discussing SRs in this way continues at each clinic visit until there is reasonable agreement between the parent s and the speech pathologist s SR scores. Reasonable agreement is when the parent s and speech pathologist s scores differ by no more than one scale value. Weekly Clinic Visits During the first stage of the program, the parent and child attend the speech clinic once a week for between 45 minutes and one hour. Procedures for these visits are described in PART THREE. Treatment in Structured and Unstructured Conversations Throughout the program the parent conducts treatment in the child s everyday environment. The treatment consists of parental verbal contingencies (see above), which are given during conversations with the child. At the start of Stage 1, treatment is given during structured conversations of 10-15 minutes duration. During these conversations the interchange is typically structured by the parent so that the child stutters only Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 5

occasionally. If, in a highly unusual case, a child is not able to produce consistent stutterfree speech during appropriately structured conversations, the Lidcombe Program may not be the appropriate treatment in the first instance. Treatment conversations occur at least once, and sometimes more often if appropriate, each day. Once the speech pathologist observes that the parent is giving contingencies safely and correctly, the parent can give them during unstructured conversations, at various times during the day. Treatment is withdrawn progressively during Stage 2. Programmed Maintenance The performance-contingent maintenance phase, Stage 2, is designed to maintain the low level of stuttering that is achieved during Stage 1. The child and the parent attend the clinic less and less frequently, provided the child s stuttering remains at the agreed low level. PART THREE PROCEDURES IN THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM This section describes the implementation of the essential features of the program. Evaluation Parents are asked to bring an audiotape recording of their child stuttering when they first visit the speech pathologist, in case the child is reticent or does not stutter in the clinic. The following occurs during this first visit. (1) The speech pathologist obtains information about the onset, nature and course of the child s stuttering, and the impact of the stuttering on the child and family. (2) The speech pathologist makes brief enquiries about the child s physical, linguistic and cognitive development, and the family environment. These are not explored in depth, unless the parent wishes to discuss them or there is a Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 6

possibility that stuttering treatment may conflict with other treatments, such as treatment for language delay. Environmental factors are addressed in more detail later in the program if they are thought to interfere with the child s progress through the program. (3) The speech pathologist makes a %SS measure in the clinic. (4) The speech pathologist decides if the child is stuttering. (5) If the speech pathologist and the parent agree that the child is stuttering, then the speech pathologist gives the parent information about stuttering, and the best time to begin intervention, including information about recovery without treatment. The information about the time to begin intervention is consistent with that provided in Chapter 4 of the book, The Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: A Clinician s Guide. (6) The speech pathologist informs the parent about the Lidcombe Program and the parents role in implementing it. (7) The speech pathologist and the parent decide either to postpone treatment and monitor the child s stuttering, or to commence treatment. Stage 1 During Stage 1, the parent and child attend the speech clinic once a week. The following events would normally be expected to occur during a clinic visit: The speech pathologist measures %SS while the parent and/or speech pathologist converses with the child. The speech pathologist checks the parent s use of SR scale by asking the parent to give a SR score to the above conversation. The parent reports SR scores for each day of the previous week and the speech pathologist enters them and the %SS measure into the child s chart (examples of treatment charts are in the APPENDIX). Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 7

The parent and speech pathologist compare SR scores for the previous week and clinic sample. %SS and SR scores are used as a focus for an in-depth discussion of clinical progress during the previous week. The parent demonstrates treatment procedures used during the previous week. The parent and speech pathologist discuss in-depth the treatment procedures used during the previous week. The speech pathologist and parent discuss changes to procedures for the coming week. The speech pathologist demonstrates those changes to procedures. The speech pathologist teaches the parent to do the changed procedures. The speech pathologist summarises what is expected for the coming week. The speech pathologist invites the parent to ask questions or raise issues of concern. Problem-solving is undertaken when required. Early in the program, the treatment parental verbal contingencies is given for 10-15 minutes each day during structured treatment conversations. The parent and child typically sit down in a quiet place and engage in some interactive activity. The activity is structured so that the contingencies can be delivered as described in Parental Verbal Contingencies in PART TWO. The speech pathologist subsequently instructs the parent how to give verbal contingencies in unstructured treatment conversations at various times of the day. The parent typically starts to do this when (1) the parent demonstrates safe and correct delivery of verbal contingencies in structured conversations, and (2) the parent s SRs across the day are generally low and/or stuttering severity is low during periods of the day. By the end of Stage 1, treatment usually occurs entirely during unstructured treatment conversations. When stuttering reaches a very low level, the parent and child move to Stage 2 of the program. The criteria for progressing to Stage 2 are: (1) %SS less than 1.0 within the Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 8

clinic, and (2) SR scores for the previous week of 1 or 2, with at least four of these being 1. These criteria need to be achieved for three consecutive clinic visits. Stage 2 During Stage 2 of the Lidcombe Program the parent progressively reduces the frequency of verbal contingencies, and the child and parent attend the clinic less and less frequently, providing that the child s stuttering remains at the low levels described above. The first two clinic visits are 2 weeks apart, the next two are 4 weeks apart, then two are 8 weeks apart, and the final two visits are 16 weeks apart. There is some flexibility in these schedules (see PART FOUR). If criterion speech performance is met at a visit, the child progresses to the next scheduled visit. Whether or not criterion speech performance is met is determined in the same way as in Stage 1: The parent presents SR scores for each day from the previous week, and the speech pathologist makes a %SS measure in the clinic. In the event of criterion speech performance not being met at any scheduled visit during Stage 2, the speech pathologist decides either to stall progress through the sequence or to return to an earlier stage of the sequence. The speech pathologist may also decide to return the child to Stage 1. PART FOUR INDIVIDUALISING THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM While the components described in PART TWO are essential to the Lidcombe Program, it is important that their implementation be individualised for each child and family. The speech pathologist and the parent adopt a problem-solving approach to ensure that the program is implemented in an optimum fashion and that it remains a positive and enjoyable experience for the child. The following few examples illustrate ways in which the program might be individualised for children and their families: Age of the Child The age and cognitive and linguistic development of the child will determine (1) the type of activity engaged in during structured treatment conversations, and (2) the duration Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 9

of the treatment conversation. For example, it may be more appropriate with a very young child to engage in general conversation during a treatment conversation, while describing pictures or retelling an event may be more appropriate with an older child. Shorter treatment conversations may be more appropriate for the younger child. The child s age may also influence the type of contingencies used, because it is essential that (1) the child perceives the contingencies for stutter-free speech as rewarding and (2) the verbal contingencies for stuttering are not perceived by the child as unpleasant or punitive. It may be appropriate for the parent to discuss with the child what verbal contingencies the child prefers. Stuttering Severity When stuttering is severe, the parent structures activities and conversations during treatment conversations so that the child produces sufficient stutter-free utterances to maintain the principle described in Parental Verbal Contingencies in PART TWO, page 4; namely, that most of the parent s verbal contingencies are for stutter-free speech rather than for stuttering. To this end, the parent can organise activities so that the child produces shorter utterances which are more likely to be free of stuttering. For example, the parent may use simple stimulus cards requiring short verbal responses rather than engage the child in free-flowing conversation. When the child responds to this procedure with longer intervals of stutter-free speech, more normal conversation is resumed. The schedule of visits for Stage 2 may also be altered for individual cases. For example the frequency of visits may be reduced when it is clear that the child no longer stutters at all in any situation. However, visits must be maintained over the time span stipulated for Stage 2, even though the frequency of visits may be reduced. Basic Behaviour Giving verbal contingencies effectively may be difficult with extremely talkative children, and particular care may be needed when structuring activities and conversations in such cases. In (rare) cases of recalcitrant children, compliance with the interactive activities may need to be increased before treatment can be given effectively. Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 10

Personality of the Child and the Parent Parental verbal contingencies for stuttering may be withheld altogether at the start of Stage 1 if a child is not happy having attention drawn to stutter-free speech, or to stuttering. A parent who feels generally uncomfortable drawing attention to any aspect of a child s speech may need particular assistance from the clinician. Family Circumstances Parents may need help with time management if they have other young children or if both parents work long hours outside the home. Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 11

APPENDIX EXAMPLES OF STUTTERING MEASUREMENT CHARTS FOR STAGE 1 OF THE LIDCOMBE PROGRAM Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 12

The Lidcombe Program Stuttering Measures Joshua Severity % SS Date 04 08 04 15 04 22 04 29 Date 05 13 05 20 06 03 Date 06 17 06 24 06 30 Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 13

The Lidcombe Program Stuttering Measures Leon severity % SS Date 04 26 05 03 05 10 05 24 Date 05 31 06 07 06 14 U T A Date 07 05 07 12 Manual for the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention (2008) 14