May 15, Dear Parents and Community Members:

Similar documents
DISTRICT LETTERHEAD. REVISED TEMPLATE (Letter Sent on District s Letterhead) School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Assistant Superintendent of Business &

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration

22932 Woodward Ave., Ferndale, MI School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

MACOMB MONTESSORI ACADEMY School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter - REVISED

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2555 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI www. a2schools.org Pioneer High School Annual Education Report (AER)!

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration. July 30, Dear Parents and Community Members:

School / District Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

August 10, School Name Reason(s) for not making AYP Key actions underway to address the issues McKinley Adult and Alternative Education Center

Warren Consolidated Schools

adin Aadin Arts/Rg Disadvantaged ARn English Language 04 All Students % 67,7% 72.7% 0% 72.7% 18.2% Arts I Reading

ESSA Accountability Alignment

Jackson Public Schools

Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction, and Student Achievement. Canby Public Schools, ISD 891. Systems Accountability. Approved October 14, 2014

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

the Deaf and the Blind

ACTION PLAN: REGULAR PROGRAMS AND ADDITIONAL STRATEGIES

Hawaii Center for the Deaf & the Blind

Hawaii School for the Deaf & the Blind

Measuring Student Progress in Reading and Mathematics K-8

These materials are Copyright NCHAM (National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management). All rights reserved. They may be reproduced

Principal, Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program Class Code: 1450 Work Days: 220

State Summary Table 1 Child Care Workers/ Educators. Teachers 3 Assistant Teachers 4 Directors FCCH Providers

2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

Introduction. Proficiency Student growth Growth gap reduction Graduation rates

Grossmont College 2016 Student Success Key Performance Indicators

Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services Preliminary Data for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students in Colorado s Public Schools

Deaths in Hawaii Due to Major Cardiovascular Disease

2016 Pharmacist Re-Licensure Survey Instrument

GLS Grantee Meeting 2018

Commissioner s Update on A F Accountability Model OVERVIEW OF CURRENT WORK-IN-PROGRESS

School Consultation Project Application

A Cross-validation of easycbm Mathematics Cut Scores in. Oregon: Technical Report # Daniel Anderson. Julie Alonzo.

Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy Minimum Data Set Questionnaire

Cross-validation of easycbm Reading Cut Scores in Washington:

SAVE THE DATE!!!!

Arizona Youth Tobacco Survey 2005 Report

Total Elementary School Middle School High School Confidence Level = 95% Total Column % Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %

ATHLETIC TRAINING, MA

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMMES

Alcohol use and binge drinking among Hispanic/Latino subculture youth, and the differences in the affect of acculturation

Evaluators Perspectives on Research on Evaluation

Jefferson County School Based Health Centers Participation Report

GET READY FOR THE NEXT STEP. COLLEGE PREPARATION GUIDE INFORMATION FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report

ADEA Survey of Dental School Seniors, 2015 Graduating Class Tables Report

Survey of Dentists in Delaware

Results from the 2013 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines

Physical Fitness Test (PFT) Student Data File Layout Tab- Delimited Text

Arkansas Association of the Deaf High School Scholarship Program

Project Goal(s) and Objectives What is a goal? What is an objective? Measurable Objectives

Diabetes - Deaths African Americans and Latinos are more likely to die from diabetes than other Contra Costa residents.

Snack Food and Beverage Interventions in Schools

Graduates of the Dental Hygiene program are eligible to write the National Board and take the Central Regional Dental Testing Service Inc. exam.

NATIONAL CERTIFICATE IN TOBACCO TREATMENT PRACTICE (NCTTP) TEST EXEMPTION OFFER APPLICATION VALID: OCTOBER 15, APRIL 15, 2018

WASHINGTON STATE COMPARISONS TO: KITSAP COUNTY CORE PUBLIC HEALTH INDICATORS May 2015

No Child Left Behind and the Testing of Deaf Students

Veterans Certified Peer Specialist Training

Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Training Results (2009)

Back to Table of Contents. Page 1 of 12 4/25/2017

NATIONAL CERTIFICATE IN TOBACCO TREATMENT PRACTICE (NCTTP) APPLICATION

Denton BASIC DEMOGRAPHICS QUICK REFERENCE OF 318 PEOPLE COUNTED

S.O.S. Suicide Prevention Program

Certified Peer Specialist Training Application

EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETING AND THE VIRGINIA QUALITY ASSURANCE SCREENING (VQAS) FACTS YOU SHOULD KNOW

Building Systems to Evaluate Food Insecurity Screening and Diabetes Within an FQHC

Indiana Family Nutrition Program Fiscal Year Final Report

Developing an Effective IEP for Children with Deaf-Blindness: A Parent Mini-Guide

State of Louisiana. Louisiana Department of Health Office of Behavioral Health

Class of 2021 Sophomore Parent Counselor Meeting December 5th, 2018

INSPECT Overview and FAQs

Demographics and Health Data

Accelerating Uptake of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine in Inland Northern California

Demographics and Health Data

2004 MAKING ACHIEVEMENT POSSIBLE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

Instructions: Please respond to each question as accurately as possible. There may be questions where you may indicate more than one response.

Students must meet the standard entry requirements as set in the University Regulations.

The Oral Health Workforce & Access to Dental Care

ADEA Survey of Dental School Seniors, 2018 Graduating Class Tables Report

In Health Matters, Place Matters - The Health Opportunity Index (HOI) Virginia Department of Health Office of Health Equity

Intensive Training. Early Childhood Intensive Training K-12 Intensive Training Building Your Future Intensive Training

Exiting Data Formatting Information

The effects of a visual activity schedule on students with ASD Multiplication fluency. Luis Figueroa. Florida International University

July 2019 Submission Formatting Information

Response to the Language Equality and Acquisition for Deaf Kids (LEAD-K) Task Force Report

Mediapolis CSD Wellness Policy

Cancer Deaths California,

SPORT & FITNESS / FITNESS / SPORT AND RECREATION

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Specialty Endorsement. Application. RICB HIV Specialty Endorsement Application June

Russell Counselor Schedule r06\11\08

MAKING TRANSITION HAPPEN!

HELP MAKE YOUR EVENTS MORE ACCESSIBLE TO PEOPLE WHO ARE HARD OF HEARING OR DEAF

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory New Student Report

Solvay Union Free School District and Syracuse University: A Partnership for the Development of Students, Pre-service Teachers and In-service

EDUCATION (EDUC) Education (EDUC) 1. EDUC EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY Short Title: EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

July 2018 Submission Formatting Information

Transcription:

May 15, 2018 Dear Parents and Community Members: We are pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 2017-18 educational progress for the Zemmer Campus 8/9 Building. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability, and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact Mrs. Amy Maruca for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site http://www.lapeerschools.org/cms/one.aspx?portalid=3097475&pageid= or you may review a copy in the main office at your child s school. For the 2017-18 year, no new Priority or Focus schools were named; some Priority or Focus schools did exit their status because they met the exit criteria. New Reward schools were identified using school rankings and Beating the Odds information. A Focus school is one that has a large achievement gap between the highest and lowest achieving 30% of schools. A Priority school is one whose achievement and growth is in the lowest 5% of all schools in the state. A Reward school is one that has achieved one or more of the following distinctions: top 5% of schools on the Top-to-Bottom School Rankings, top 5% of schools making the greatest gains in achievement (improvement metric), or Beating the Odds by outperforming the school s predicted ranking and/or similar schools. Some schools are not identified with any of these labels. In these cases no label is given. Our school has not been given one of these labels. In reviewing the data in the combined report, several celebrations and challenges have been identified based on the results of Zemmer Campus 8/9 Building in relation to the state. The primary celebration would be the performance of 9 th graders on the PSAT 8/9 in both the fall and spring test; these students outperformed 9 th grade classes throughout the county in both Evidence-Based Reading and Writing and. On the M-STEP results, Zemmer 8 th graders improved on the previous year s performance in reading and math. The primary

challenge is improving of student performance in 8 th grade math. To address these issues, our school improvement plan has been developed to provide training to staff through differentiating our instructional practices to meet student needs and supporting that training through learning coach goals with staff in the classroom. Additionally, we intend to improve our professional learning communities to focus on student learning, growth, and lesson design. Zemmer has undertaken several key initiatives to accelerate student achievement and close the achievement gap. Extended School Day Advancement Opportunities School Improvement Process Full day Professional Development and Data Days Professional Learning Communities Adolescent Accelerated Reading Initiative After School Support from teachers in Reading and Math Summer School Programs Online Advancement and Remediation I-Connect Reading Initiative I-Connect Academic Support Initiative Year-Round School Calendar State law requires that we also report additional information. PROCESS FOR ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students in grades 8-9 in Lapeer Community Schools attend Zemmer Campus. The only exception to this assignment is those students who choose to attend the Alternative Program based on their academic needs. THE STATUS OF THE 3-5 YEAR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Goal Statement: All students at Zemmer Campus will be proficient in reading. 2

100% of 8 th graders will meet the pro-rated college benchmark score for their grade from fall to spring. 100% of 9 th graders will meet the college benchmark score on the PSAT in reading. Student Goal Statement: All students will demonstrate improved proficiency in mathematics. 100% of 8 th graders will meet the pro-rated college benchmark score for their grade from fall to spring. 100% of 9 th graders will meet the college benchmark score on the PSAT in reading. Student Goal Statement: All students will demonstrate proficiency in writing. 100% of all students will demonstrate proficiency on a common writing assignment or final assessment in. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS IN THE DISTRICT Specialized schools provide alternative educational opportunities for students on either a part-time or full-time basis. In addition to the regular K-12 program provided by Lapeer Community Schools, the district has students attending five specialized school programs: Special education for the most severely handicapped students, Community High School, Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center and two options utilizing the Year-Round calendar at both the K-5 and 6-8 grade levels. The Lapeer Intermediate School offers programs for the most severe mentally, physically and emotionally impaired students. Most of these programs are housed at the Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center. Lapeer Community High School serves at-risk youths ages 14-18 in an alternative environment. The school provides a curriculum designed to develop employability and social skills as well as academic skills. A range of services address problems such as poor attendance, poor academic performance and behavioral issues. The Center for Innovation at the West Campus is a program that will offer series of project based learning classes, a Project Lead the Way science program for students in grades 6-12, college on campus courses, and other 3

programs. Many students in grades 6-12 will opt to spend a portion of their day at the CFI campus in order to take advantage of these many educational options. The Lapeer County Educational and Technical Center provides vocational education and related services to high school students from all of the county high schools. in the 15 programs learn job specific skills to help them prepare for employment upon graduation. They also learn academic skills in an applied setting. Lapeer Community School s Year-Round Middle School is a program for students in grades 6-8 that operates on a balanced calendar. attend school the same number of days as traditional calendar students, but have a shorter summer break and more frequent week-long breaks during the school year. This program is housed at Rolland-Warner Campus 6/7 building during August. in grades 6-8 will begin their year on this campus and then students in grade 8 will relocate to the Zemmer 8/9 campus in September. Approximately 200 students participated in the Year-Round Middle School program this past school year. Turrill Year-Round Elementary School is a program for students in grades E5-5 that operates on a balanced calendar. attend school the same number of days as traditional calendar students, but have a shorter summer break and more frequent week -long breaks during the school year. During these week-long breaks, students can opt to attend intercession camps for a nominal fee. Turrill has over 450 students that take advantage of this option for their elementary school years. Core Curriculum The core curriculum of Lapeer Community Schools is modeled after the Michigan Department of Education s (MDE) K-12 Curriculum and Standards. Our teachers have developed and continue to work on pacing guides, lesson plans and assessments to align with MDE grade or course level specific expectations. To access the core curriculum online, visit http://www.mich.gov/mde; click on Curriculum & Instruction on the menu, and then select Grade Level or High School Expectations. 4

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT RESULTS The state testing data below can be found in our district AER report or in the MiSchoolData report. In addition, our 8 th graders took the PSAT 8/9 in both the fall and the spring as a measure of the growth during the 2017-18 academic year. 8 th Grade students participated in the state-mandated MSTEP. MSTEP 2015-16 Proficiency 2016-17 Proficiency MATH 17% 21% 37% 42% 23% 26% 8 th Grade PSAT Results PSAT Fall 2017 % meeting benchmark Spring 2018 % meeting benchmark Evidence Based Reading and Writing 52% 55% 29% 30% 5

9 th Grade PSAT Results PSAT Fall 2017 % meeting benchmark Fall 2016 Scores/ % meeting benchmark Evidence Based Reading and Writing 60% 64% 30% 40% PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES During the 2016-17 school year, Zemmer conducted two sets of parent- teacher conferences, one during the fall and one in the spring. The fall conferences took place over two evenings while the winter conferences took place on one night. Year Fall Winter % Parents % Parents 2015-16 43% 22% 2016-17 45% 20% In closing, Zemmer Campus 8/9 Building, is continuing to work and grow in meeting the needs of all of our students. We are continually looking for ways to not only meet the needs of our struggling students, but to help all students grow. Our overall goal is to continue striving to close our achievement gaps and to move all of our students towards proficiency and beyond. Our dedicated staff combined with 6

quality curriculum and instruction is working to meet the needs of all of our students. With a continued focus on improving instruction and curriculum I look forward to see the long-term growth and success at Zemmer Campus. Sincerely, Amy Maruca. Principal 7

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not All 2015-16 48.9% 37.1% 37.1% 6.7% 30.4% 35.2% 27.7% All 2016-17 48.0% 41.7% 41.7% 9.4% 32.3% 28.7% 29.6% Indian or Alaska Native 2016-17 39.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2015-16 73.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2016-17 73.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2015-16 24.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2016-17 24.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 35.2% 30.8% 30.8% 0.0% 30.8% 46.2% 23.1% Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 36.9% 33.3% 33.3% 6.7% 26.7% 33.3% 33.3% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2015-16 49.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2015-16 47.8% 41.7% 41.7% 8.3% 33.3% 25.0% 33.3% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Two or More Races 2016-17 45.6% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 50.0% 30.0% White 2015-16 55.2% 37.5% 37.5% 7.0% 30.5% 34.9% 27.6% White 2016-17 53.9% 43.1% 43.1% 9.9% 33.2% 27.7% 29.2% Female 2015-16 54.9% 45.1% 45.1% 9.8% 35.2% 34.7% 20.2% Female 2016-17 54.9% 50.8% 50.8% 14.9% 35.9% 29.3% 19.9% Male 2015-16 43.0% 28.6% 28.6% 3.3% 25.3% 35.7% 35.7% Male 2016-17 41.4% 34.6% 34.6% 5.1% 29.5% 28.2% 37.2% 2015-16 32.5% 30.9% 30.9% 2.8% 28.2% 35.9% 33.1% 2016-17 31.8% 34.9% 34.9% 3.7% 31.2% 27.5% 37.6% English Learners 2015-16 17.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With Disabilities 2015-16 10.6% 5.9% 5.9% 0.0% 5.9% 23.5% 70.6% With Disabilities 2016-17 10.6% 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 13.5% 83.8% All 2015-16 32.7% 17.2% 17.2% 5.3% 11.9% 27.8% 55.0% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not All 2016-17 33.5% 20.7% 20.7% 8.3% 12.4% 25.1% 54.1% Indian or Alaska Native 2016-17 21.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2015-16 67.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2016-17 67.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2015-16 9.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2016-17 10.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 18.6% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 7.7% 30.8% 61.5% Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 19.5% 13.3% 13.3% 0.0% 13.3% 33.3% 53.3% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2015-16 34.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2015-16 29.8% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 33.3% 41.7% Two or More Races 2016-17 28.9% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 30.0% 60.0% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not White 2015-16 38.3% 17.3% 17.3% 5.5% 11.8% 27.7% 55.0% White 2016-17 39.2% 21.3% 21.3% 8.9% 12.4% 24.2% 54.5% Female 2015-16 34.1% 15.4% 15.4% 4.1% 11.3% 32.3% 52.3% Female 2016-17 35.2% 24.2% 24.2% 8.4% 15.7% 28.1% 47.8% Male 2015-16 31.4% 19.1% 19.1% 6.6% 12.6% 23.0% 57.9% Male 2016-17 31.8% 18.1% 18.1% 8.2% 9.9% 22.8% 59.1% 2015-16 16.7% 13.7% 13.7% 2.7% 11.0% 26.4% 59.9% 2016-17 16.9% 13.6% 13.6% 3.3% 10.3% 26.6% 59.8% English Learners 2015-16 11.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With Disabilities 2015-16 5.3% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 2.9% 2.9% 94.3% With Disabilities 2016-17 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% All 2015-16 29.3% 23.4% 23.4% 3.4% 19.9% 47.2% 29.4% All 2016-17 31.4% 25.9% 25.9% 2.7% 23.2% 37.2% 36.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Indian or Alaska Native 2016-17 27.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2015-16 53.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Asian 2016-17 53.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2015-16 9.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Black or African 2016-17 9.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Hispanic of Any Race 2015-16 18.0% 23.1% 23.1% 0.0% 23.1% 38.5% 38.5% Hispanic of Any Race 2016-17 19.3% 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 46.7% 33.3% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 2015-16 32.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Two or More Races 2015-16 28.7% 33.3% 33.3% 8.3% 25.0% 33.3% 33.3% Two or More Races 2016-17 28.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 34.3% 23.1% 23.1% 3.4% 19.7% 48.0% 28.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 24

M-STEP Grades 3-11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not White 2016-17 37.1% 26.8% 26.8% 2.9% 23.9% 36.3% 36.8% Female 2015-16 26.0% 19.5% 19.5% 2.6% 16.9% 49.2% 31.3% Female 2016-17 28.6% 18.4% 18.4% 2.2% 16.2% 45.8% 35.8% Male 2015-16 32.6% 27.4% 27.4% 4.3% 23.1% 45.2% 27.4% Male 2016-17 34.0% 31.7% 31.7% 3.0% 28.7% 30.4% 37.8% 2015-16 15.8% 18.4% 18.4% 2.7% 15.7% 43.8% 37.8% 2016-17 16.4% 20.1% 20.1% 2.2% 17.9% 35.3% 44.6% English Learners 2015-16 7.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 With Disabilities 2015-16 7.6% 5.6% 5.6% 2.8% 2.8% 27.8% 66.7% With Disabilities 2016-17 8.1% 2.7% 2.7% 0.0% 2.7% 21.6% 75.7% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 24

SAT Location Name School Year Subject Student Group Mean SAT Score Benchmark Met or Exceeded % Met or Exceeded Did Not Meet % Did Not Meet Number Assessed No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 24

MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging All 2015-16 88.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2016-17 82.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2015-16 64.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2016-17 63.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2015-16 43.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2016-17 41.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 88.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2016-17 85.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 68.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2016-17 67.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2015-16 45.7% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2016-17 46.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Female 2015-16 91.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 24

MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging Female 2016-17 84.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Female 2015-16 61.5% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Female 2016-17 58.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Female 2015-16 45.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Female 2016-17 41.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2015-16 86.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2016-17 81.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2015-16 66.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2016-17 66.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2015-16 42.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2016-17 42.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2015-16 89.0% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2016-17 83.8% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 24

MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging 2015-16 66.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2016-17 65.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2015-16 43.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2016-17 43.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 10 of 24

MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging All 2016-17 80.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 All 2016-17 76.6% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2016-17 80.3% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 White 2016-17 76.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2016-17 78.2% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 Male 2016-17 76.4% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2016-17 81.1% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 2016-17 76.9% <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 11 of 24

MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 12 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** All 98.6% 49.5% 98.7% 52.7% 99.8% 42.2% All 98.7% 39.1% 98.6% 36.6% 99.1% 21.0% All Science 97.9% 24.9% 97.8% 25.8% N/A N/A All 97.8% 33.7% 97.6% 33.6% 97.9% 25.9% Bottom 30% N/A 3.8% N/A 1.2% N/A 0.0% Bottom 30% N/A 1.5% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% Bottom 30% Science N/A 0.4% N/A 0.6% N/A N/A Bottom 30% N/A 0.6% N/A 0.0% N/A 0.0% Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native Indian or Alaska Native 97.6% 40.5% <30 <30 <30 <30 97.8% 28.8% <30 <30 <30 <30 Science 96.8% 19.1% <30 <30 N/A N/A 96.4% 28.9% <30 <30 <30 <30 Asian 99.1% 70.5% <30 <30 <30 <30 Asian 99.3% 68.9% <30 <30 <30 <30 Asian Science 99.1% 41.4% <30 <30 N/A N/A Asian 98.9% 51.9% <30 <30 <30 <30 Black or African Black or African Black or African Black or African Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race 97.6% 25.0% <30 <30 <30 <30 97.5% 14.2% <30 <30 <30 <30 Science 96.0% 7.0% <30 <30 N/A N/A 95.9% 11.2% <30 <30 <30 <30 98.6% 36.9% 98.7% 42.7% <30 <30 98.7% 25.1% 98.7% 29.4% <30 <30 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 13 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Science 97.7% 13.5% <30 <30 N/A N/A 97.8% 21.1% 100.0% 25.6% <30 <30 97.7% 54.8% <30 <30 N/A N/A 98.1% 43.4% <30 <30 N/A N/A Science 97.6% 28.3% <30 <30 N/A N/A 98.1% 38.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A 98.7% 46.6% 100.0% 41.7% <30 <30 98.6% 35.1% 100.0% 28.6% <30 <30 Science 97.7% 21.9% 96.8% <30 N/A N/A 97.7% 29.7% <30 <30 <30 <30 White 98.9% 56.1% 98.7% 53.6% 99.7% 43.6% White 99.0% 45.6% 98.7% 37.0% 99.5% 21.6% White Science 98.4% 29.7% 98.0% 26.2% N/A N/A White 98.3% 39.7% 97.9% 34.7% 98.5% 26.8% 98.2% 33.5% 98.7% 42.8% 99.5% 36.0% 98.3% 23.3% 98.6% 28.7% 97.9% 14.0% Science 97.2% 13.0% 97.7% 18.5% N/A N/A 97.0% 18.3% 97.6% 23.6% 96.9% 20.1% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 14 of 24

Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** English Learners English Learners English Learners English Learners With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities 98.6% 24.0% <30 <30 N/A N/A 99.0% 23.0% <30 <30 N/A N/A Science 98.4% 5.0% <30 <30 N/A N/A 98.2% 7.8% <30 <30 N/A N/A 97.5% 26.0% 98.6% 28.0% 97.7% 11.9% 97.9% 20.7% 99.1% 19.8% 97.7% 7.1% Science 96.9% 15.8% 98.3% 14.7% N/A N/A 95.9% 14.2% 94.9% 11.6% 90.9% 2.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 15 of 24

Accountability Details Graduation Data Student Group Statewide School All 79.65% 81.84% N/A Indian or Alaska Native 66.57% 50.00% N/A Asian 90.20% 100.00% N/A Black or African 67.36% 66.67% N/A Hispanic of Any Race 72.60% 76.92% N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 77.68% N/A N/A Two or More Races 73.67% 66.67% N/A White 83.38% 82.28% N/A Female 83.46% N/A N/A Male 76.04% N/A N/A 67.10% 69.94% N/A English Learners 72.11% 66.67% N/A With Disabilities 55.35% 56.90% N/A Bottom 30% N/A N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 16 of 24

Accountability Details Attendance Data Student Group Statewide School All 84.41% 88.24% 85.35% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 17 of 24

Accountability Index Data School Name Proficiency Index Value Growth Index Value Graduation Rate Index Value EL Progress Index Value School Quality/Student Success Index Value General Participation Index Value EL Participation Index Value Overall Index Value Zemmer Campus 8/9 44.62 41.61 N/A N/A 85.71 99.64 N/A 52.00 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 18 of 24

Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. 0 14 32 0 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools age of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 0.0% N/A N/A Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification age of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification 10.9% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 19 of 24

NAEP Grade 4 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 25 39 28 7 Male Female 50 50 25 25 39 42 28 26 7 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 48 43 1 40 12 42 36 17 39 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 65 17 8 5 &#8225 4 17 55 39 9 24 41 36 43 21 37 34 9 15 42 26 8 1 4 28 12 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 11 89 59 21 28 40 11 30 2 8 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 8 92 41 24 40 39 16 29 2 8 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2017 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 20 of 24

NAEP Grade 8 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 38 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 38 24 36 23 38 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 38 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 38 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 26 2 24 # 9 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2017 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 21 of 24

NAEP Grade 4 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 38 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or African Hispanic Asian Indian or Alaska Native Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 38 24 36 23 38 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 38 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 38 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 36 2 24 # 9 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 24

NAEP Grade 8 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 100 33 35 22 9 Male Female 51 49 35 32 34 37 21 23 10 7 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 41 58 1 52 20 32 38 13 29 2 13 Race/Ethnicity White Black or Afican Hispanic Asian/Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Indian or Alaska Native Two or More Races 71 15 7 4 1 3 26 67 48 13 40 38 24 36 23 38 27 8 12 27 16 10 1 3 38 6 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 46 58 45 20 37 38 15 29 3 13 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 6 94 75 31 23 36 2 24 # 9 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2017 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 24

NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Standard Error 4 Math Reading 81 82 2.7 3.3 94 90 2.7 3.4 8 Math Reading 85 84 2.4 2.4 86 92 3.2 1.9 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 24