Brookings Roundtable on Active Medical Product Surveillance:

Similar documents
Study Exposures, Outcomes:

ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION. Comparative Risk for Angioedema Associated With the Use of Drugs That Target the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System

ASEBP and ARTA TARP Drugs and Reference Price by Categories

Factors Involved in Poor Control of Risk Factors

Conversion of losartan to lisinopril

State of the art treatment of hypertension: established and new drugs. Prof. M. Burnier Service of Nephrology and Hypertension Lausanne, Switzerland

Introductory Clinical Pharmacology Chapter 41 Antihypertensive Drugs

Antihypertensive Agents

Florida Blue QUALITY PERFORMANCE METRIC STANDARDS FEBRUARY 2013

Scientific conclusions and detailed explanation of the scientific grounds for the differences from the PRAC recommendation

Hypertension (JNC-8)

Scientific conclusions and detailed explanation of the scientific grounds for the differences from the PRAC recommendation

Cilazapril to lisinopril dose conversion

Guidelines for the Prescribing of Sacubitril / Valsartan

Lisinopril 20 converting to losartan

Highlights from the Fifth Annual Sentinel Initiative Public Workshop

Lisinopril losartan conversion dose

Losartan lisinopril equivalent dose

Losartan lisinopril equivalent dose 新着 news 2018 年 3 月 6 日高等部 3 年生 大阪リゾート & スポーツ専門学校に合格! 2018 年 3 月 2 日茨木市立山手台小学校との交流.

Entresto Development of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Codes for a Medicare claims-based model to predict LVEF class- User Guide

Target dose achievement of evidencebased medications in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction attending a heart failure clinic

Select Preventive Prescription Drugs Jan. 1, 2018

ACE Inhibitors and ARBs To Protect Your Heart? A Guide for Patients Being Treated for Stable Coronary Heart Disease

What in the World is Functional Medicine?

Don t let the pressure get to you:

New Lipid Guidelines. PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN: Implications of the New Guidelines for Hypertension and Lipids.

Don t let the pressure get to you:

Generic Drugs: What does equal really mean? Dr. Peter J. Lin Director Primary Care Initiatives Canadian Heart Research Centre

How CDER is Using Mini-Sentinel Tools and Resources for Post-Marketing Safety Issues

12.5mg, 25mg, 50mg. 25mg, 50mg. 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg. 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 100mg. 25mg. -- $2.81 Acetazolamide (IR, 125mg, 250mg, 500mg (ER)

Integrating Sentinel into Routine Regulatory Drug Review: A Snapshot of the First Year. Risk of seizures associated with Ranolazine (Ranexa)

Volume 6; Number 1 January 2012 NICE CLINICAL GUIDELINE 127: HYPERTENSION CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF PRIMARY HYPERTENSION IN ADULTS (AUGUST 2011)

12.5mg, 25mg, 50mg. 25mg, 50mg. 250mg, 500mg, 250mg/5ml. 2.5mg, 5mg, 10mg. 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 100mg. 25mg

DRUG CLASSIFICATION. Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease

ACEBUTOLOL HCL 100MG TABLET GENERIC BETA BLOCKERS ALISKIREN 150MG TABLET RASILAZ RENIN INHIBITOR

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS ARE FIRST LINE TREATMENT : PRO

An Overview of the Design and Implementation of FDA s Prospective Routine Observational Monitoring Program Tools for Safety Surveillance

Blood pressure control. Rok Humar, PhD Department of Research

Annual Review of Antihypertensives - Fiscal Year 2009

Management of Lipid Disorders and Hypertension: Implications of the New Guidelines

PCORnet Use Cases. Observational study: Dabigatran vs warfarin and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke / extra-cranial bleeding

Perioperative use of angiotensin blockade

Metabolic Consequences of Anti Hypertensives: Is It Clinically Important?

Managing Hypertension in 2016

Use of Secondary Prevention Drug Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome After Hospital Discharge

Clinical Teach-Back Cards

Living with Congestive Heart Failure: A Guide to a Healthy Heart

ANTIHYPERTENSIVES. Assoc. Prof. Bilgen Başgut

Cardiac Medications At A Glance

FDA Sentinel Initiative: Status Update and Examples of Contributions to Regulatory Decisions

Managing Hypertension in Diabetes Sean Stewart, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CLS Internal Medicine Park Nicollet Clinic St Louis Park.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy

Hypertension Update Clinical Controversies Regarding Age and Race

Modern Management of Hypertension: Where Do We Draw the Line?

Generic Preventive Care/ Safe Harbor Drug Program List

Which antihypertensives are more effective in reducing diastolic hypertension versus systolic hypertension? May 24, 2017

HEALTHCARE EFFECTIVENESS DATA AND INFORMATION SET (HEDIS )

Antihypertensive Agents Part-2. Assistant Prof. Dr. Najlaa Saadi PhD Pharmacology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Philadelphia

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 27 May 2009

Guide to the Modernized Reference Drug Program

Section 3, Lecture 2

Clinical Policy: ACEI and ARB Duplicate Therapy Reference Number: CP.PMN.61 Effective Date: Last Review Date: 05.18

DROGAS PARA HIPERTENSION ARTERIAL JONATHAN POVEDA FERNANDEZ HSJD / 2013 FACC/FSCAI/FESC

The ADDITION Study: A study about screening for diabetes. Screening Case Report Form

Lisinopril to losartan equivalent

Class Update: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs), Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), and Direct Renin Inhibitors (DRIs)

Hypertension is also an important risk factor in the development of chronic kidney disease and heart failure.

Entresto (Sacubitril Valsartan) An information guide

MODERN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION Where Do We Draw the Line? Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Blood Pressure and Risk

Hypertension Management - Summary

Amlodipine/olmesartan (Azor ) is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive medications.

PHARMACOLOGIC STRATEGIES

Treating Hypertension in Individuals with Diabetes

Adapted d from Federation of Health Regulatory Colleges of Ontario Template Last Updated September 18, 2017

New classification of HT Systolic Diastolic Normal <120 <80 Prehypertension Stage1HT Stage 2 HT >160 or >100

Speaker Disclosure. Objectives. Outline. Local Opinion Leaders. Presented by R. Slavik, IH Pharmacy Live Rounds (Mar 1 st and 6 th, 2013)

Preventing and Treating High Blood Pressure

Clinical Teach-Back Cards

Management of Hypertension

Modern Management of Hypertension

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEi), but not Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs) are associated with Ischaemic Colitis

Dr Narender Goel MD (Internal Medicine and Nephrology) Financial Disclosure: None, Conflict of Interest: None

HypertensionTreatment Guidelines. Michaelene Urban APRN, MSN, ACNS-BC, ANP-BC

*NOTE: When submitting CPT code and 99239, it is recommended the measure be submitted each time the code is submitted for hospital discharge.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 7 January 2009

ISMJ International SportMed Journal

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care (2008) PROVIDER REFERENCE CARDS Chronic Kidney Disease

Antihypertensive Drug Procurement Trends from 1995 to 2004: Transition over a Decade. Khalid AJ Al Khaja, PhD*

Antihypertensive Drugs. Munir Gharaibeh, MD, PhD, MHPE Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan November, 2014

MINI-SENTINEL METHODS PROSPECTIVE ROUTINE OBSERVATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM TOOLS (PROMPT) USERS GUIDE

The impact of age and sex on the reporting of cough and angioedema with renin angiotensin system inhibitors: a case/ noncase study in VigiBase

8/19/2016. No Conflicts. I struggled with everything cardiac in nursing school.

Hypertension 2015: Recent Evidence that Will Change Your Practice

HYPERTENSION IN CKD. LEENA ONGAJYOOTH, M.D., Dr.med RENAL UNIT SIRIRAJ HOSPITAL

University of Al Qadisiyah College of Pharmacy Dr. Bassim I Mohammad, MBChB, MSc, Ph.D

ACP Brief Fall 2006 prioritization. Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) for Proteinuria, Hypertension (HTN) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)

Volume 2 Number 2 (2011)

Treatment of Essential Hypertension

Transcription:

2012, The Brookings Institution Brookings Roundtable on Active Medical Product Surveillance: Findings from a Mini-Sentinel Medical Product Assessment Marsha Reichman, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Darren Toh, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute October 16, 2012

2012, The Brookings Institution Welcome and Overview Housekeeping: To minimize feedback, please confirm that the microphone on your telephone is muted. To mute your phone, press the mute button or *6. (To un-mute, press *7 ) There will be several opportunities for questions and discussion throughout today s session. Please use the Q & A tab on the top of your screen to submit your questions into the queue at any point and we will call upon you to state your question. Call the Level 3 Conferencing at 1-888-447-1119 with technical problems. 2

Angioedema events and drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system A Mini-Sentinel protocol-based assessment Darren Toh, ScD Department of Population Medicine Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute On behalf of the Mini-Sentinel angioedema workgroup 1

Mini-Sentinel angioedema workgroup Name Affiliation Role Marsha Reichman OSE/CDER/FDA Co-Lead Monika Houstoun OSE/CDER/FDA Co-Lead Sean Hennessy University of Pennsylvania Co-Lead Darren Toh Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute Co-Lead Xiao Ding OTS/CDER/FDA Member Adrian Hernandez Duke University School of Medicine Member Mark Levenson OTS/CDER/FDA Member Lingling Li Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute Member Carolyn McCloskey OSE/CDER/FDA Member Azadeh Shoaibi OMP/CDERFDA Member Mary Ross Southworth OND/CDER/FDA Member Eileen Wu OSE/CDER/FDA Member Gwen Zornberg OSE/CDER/FDA Member 2

Overview Background Methods Results Discussion 3

Overview Background Methods Results Discussion 4

Mini-Sentinel partner organizations Institute for Health 5

Overarching goals of the project To assess selected drug-event associations To build general strategies in Mini-Sentinel for signal refinement regarding medical products for which substantial post-market experience has accrued This project was NOT designed to provide definitive evidence of a causal association 6

RAAS pathway Zaman et al, Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1:621-636 7

Angioedema Rapid, localized swelling of the eyes, lips, tongue, mouth, upper respiratory tract, etc Potentially life-threatening 8

RAAS drugs and angioedema risk Incidence rate of angioedema (per 1,000 person-years) ACEIs 2.0 ARBs 1.0 Aliskiren N/A* ß-blockers 0.5 Calcium channel blockers 0.5 Loop diuretics 0.5 Thiazide diuretics 0.7 * Aliskirenis the only marketed direct renin inhibitor in US. Risk of angioedema/urticaria for aliskiren is similar to or lower than ACEIs and ARBs in pooled analysis of RCTs Miller et al, Hypertension 2008;15:1624-1630 White et al, J Clin Hypertens 2010; 12:765-775 9

Question of interest Are ACEIs, ARBs or aliskiren associated with similar risks of angioedema when compared with a common referent group, ß-blockers? 10

Overview Background Methods Results Discussion 11

Mini-Sentinel partner organizations Institute for Health 12

Exposure ACEIs ARBs Direct renin inhibitors ß-blockers Benazepril(1991) Candesartan (1998) Aliskiren(2007) Acebutolol(1984) Captopril (1981) Eprosartan (1997) Atenolol(1981) Enalapril(1985) Irbesartan (1997) Bisoprolol(1992) Fosinopril(1991) Losartan(1995) Carvedilol(1995) Lisinopril(1987) Olmesartan(2002) Labetalol(1984) Moexipril(1995) Telmisartan(1998) Metoprolol (1978) Quinapril (1991) Valsartan(1996) Nebivolol(2007) Perindopril (1993) Pindolol(1982) Ramipril(1991) Propranolol (1967) Trandolapril (1996) Timolol(1981) 13

Cohort Individuals aged 18 years with a first Rx of an oral ACEIs, ARBs, aliskiren, or ß-blockers in 2001-2010 Index date: Dispensing date of first Rx of a drug of interest Additional eligibility criteria 183 days continuous enrollment with pharmacy & medical benefits prior to the index date No Rx of any study drugs in 183 days prior to the index date No diagnosis of angioedema in 183 days prior to the index date No initiation of more than one drug of interest on the index date 14

Outcome Primary outcome Angioedema ICD-9-CM code 995.1 in any position during an outpatient, inpatient, or emergency department visit (PPV 90%to 95%) (Brown et al 1996 & Miller et al 2008) Secondary outcome Serious angioedema Angioedema w/ airway obstruction requiring inpatient care Inpatient ICD-9-CM code 995.1 plus a code indicating ICU admission, intubation, tracheostomy, or laryngoscopy occurring within two days of the date of hospital admission 15

Follow-up 1/1/2001 Index date 12/31/2010 183 days Time Continuous enrollment w/ benefits No Rx of drugs of interest No Dx of angioedema Contributing person-times Angioedema 12/31/2010 Death Health plan disenrollment Cessation of treatment Initiation of another study drug 365 days of follow-up 16

Potential confounders Confounder* Age as of the index date Sex Diagnosis of Allergic reactions Diabetes Heart failure Ischemic heart disease Prescription NSAID use Categorization 18-45, 45-54, 55-64, 65 yrs Male/Female Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No *Identified during the 183-day baseline period prior to the index date 17

Statistical analysis Descriptive analysis Baseline characteristics Unadjusted incidence and incidence rate Statistical analysis Pair-wise comparison with ß-blockers as referent group Site-adjusted and PS-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs PSs calculated at each site; common PS model MS-wide estimates Case-centered logistic regression (primary) Inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis Fireman et al, Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:650-656 18

Secondary & sensitivity analysis Stratified analysis Age group Sex Follow-up period Sensitivity analysis 365-day look-back period Restricted to inpatient and ED diagnosis of angioedema Restricted to data after aliskiren approval (Mar 2007) 19

Mini-Sentinel distributed analysis 1-User creates and submits query (a computer program) 2-Data Partners retrieve query 3-Data Partners review and run query against their local data 4-Data Partners review results 5-Data Partners return results via secure network 6 Results are aggregated and returned Curtis et al, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2012;21(S1):23-31 20

Overview Background Methods Results Discussion 21

Cohort Health plan members aged 18 years between 1/1/2001 and 12/31/2010 n=65,006,161 Restricting to individuals with a Dx of any of oral ACEIs, ARBs, aliskiren, or ß-blockers n=11,952,726 Restricting to individuals with 183 days continuous enrollment w/ medical and Rx benefits n=5,322,438 Restricting to individuals with no Rx of any study drugs during the baseline period n=4,098,337 Restricting to individuals with no Dx of angioedema during the baseline period n=4,094,909 Excluding individuals dispensed with more than one study drug on the index date n=3,909,596 22

Baseline patient characteristics Characteristics Age (years) ACEIs (n=1,845,138) ARBs (n=467,313) Aliskiren (n=4,867) ß-blockers (n=1,592,278) % Std. diff. % Std. diff. % Std. diff. % 18-44 24.5 0.15 22.8 0.19 22.5 0.19 31.2 45-54 28.7 0.11 29.4 0.13 29.8 0.14 23.7 55-64 25.2 0.10 27.0 0.14 27.1 0.15 21.2 65 21.6 0.06 20.8 0.07 20.6 0.08 23.9 Female sex 46.8 0.20 50.7 0.12 46.7 0.20 56.6 Diagnosis of Allergic reactions 8.0 0.04 9.7 0.02 11.7 0.09 9.1 Diabetes 18.8 0.33 16.0 0.30 17.7 0.39 7.4 Heart failure 2.2 0.07 2.2 0.07 2.5 0.05 3.4 IHD 4.7 0.24 5.8 0.18 8.3 0.09 11.2 NSAID use 15.2 0.01 14.6 0.03 14.0 0.04 15.6 23

Incidence & incidence rate of angioedema Drug Number of events Persons Person-years Cumulative incidence per 1,000 persons Incidence rate per 1,000 personyears ACEIs 3,301 1,845,138 753,105 1.79 (1.73, 1.85) 4.38 (4.24, 4.54) ARBs 288 467,313 173,438 0.62 (0.55, 0.69) 1.66 (1.47, 1.86) Aliskiren 7 4,867 1,498 1.44 (0.58, 2.96) 4.67 (1.88, 9.63) β-blockers 915 1,592,278 548,684 0.58 (0.54, 0.61) 1.67 (1.56, 1.78) 24

Adjusted HRs of angioedema Drug Site-adjusted PS-adjusted ACEIs 2.77 (2.57, 2.98) 3.04 (2.81, 3.27) ARBs 1.11 (0.97, 1.28) 1.16 (1.00, 1.34) Aliskiren 2.75 (1.30, 5.81) 2.85 (1.34, 6.04) 25

Adjusted HRs of angioedema Drug Site-adjusted PS-adjusted Case-centered Meta-analysis Case-centered Meta-analysis ACEIs 2.77 (2.57, 2.98) 2.70 (2.50, 2.90) 3.04 (2.81, 3.27) 2.98 (2.76, 3.21) ARBs 1.11 (0.97, 1.28) 1.15 (1.00, 1.32) 1.16 (1.00, 1.34) 1.15 (1.00, 1.33) Aliskiren 2.75 (1.30, 5.81) 2.83 (1.34, 5.98) 2.85 (1.34, 6.04) 2.86 (1.35, 6.04) 26

Stratified analysis by: Age group ACEIs ARBs 27

Stratified analysis by: Sex ACEIs ARBs 28

Stratified analysis by: Follow-up period ACEIs ARBs 29

Sensitivity analysis: 365-day look-back Drug Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years PS-adjusted HR Primary 365-day Primary 365-day ACEIs 4.38 (4.24, 4.54) 4.49 (4.32, 4.66) 3.04 (2.81, 3.27) 3.36 (3.07, 3.67) ARBs 1.66 (1.47, 1.86) 1.52 (1.31, 1.76) 1.16 (1.00, 1.34) 1.21 (1.01, 1.45) Aliskiren 4.67 (1.88, 9.63) 2.90 (0.60, 8.48) 2.85 (1.34, 6.04) 4.01 (1.28, 12.57) 30

Sensitivity analysis: INP & ED diagnosis Drug Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years PS-adjusted HR Primary INP & ED only Primary INP & ED only ACEIs 4.38 (4.24, 4.54) 2.37 (2.26, 2.48) 3.04 (2.81, 3.27) 5.34 (4.69, 6.07) ARBs 1.66 (1.47, 1.86) 0.48 (0.38, 0.59) 1.16 (1.00, 1.34) 1.09 (0.83, 1.42) Aliskiren 4.67 (1.88, 9.63) 1.33 (0.16, 4.82) 2.85 (1.34, 6.04) 2.72 (0.67, 11.07) 31

Sensitivity analysis: Post aliskiren approval Drug Incidence rate per 1,000 person-years PS-adjusted HR Primary Post aliskiren Primary Post aliskiren ACEIs 4.38 (4.24, 4.54) 4.80 (4.59, 5.02) 3.04 (2.81, 3.27) 2.94 (2.65, 3.27) ARBs 1.66 (1.47, 1.86) 1.91 (1.64, 2.23) 1.16 (1.00, 1.34) 1.17 (0.97, 1.41) Aliskiren 4.67 (1.88, 9.63) 4.67 (1.88, 9.63) 2.85 (1.34, 6.04) 2.83 (1.33, 6.00) 32

Overview Background Methods Results Discussion 33

Summary of findings ACEIs: Replicated known ACEI angioedema relation Risk ~3-fold higher with ACEIs vs. ß-blockers Aliskiren: Increased risk of angioedema Based on 7 exposed cases ARBs: Slightly elevated risk of angioedema Magnitude much lower than that in ACEIs and aliskiren 34

Limitations Did not adjust for race Race a probable confounder for ACEI-angioedema relation Likely led to underestimation of relative risk 35

Strengths Large and demographically diverse study population Robust results 36

Timeline Kickoff meeting Mar 28, 2011 First workplan sent Sep 1, 2011 Completion of data analysis Jan 27, 2012 Draft final report Feb 10, 2012 37

Thank you! 38

Roundtable Discussion and Questions View this and past Active Medical Product Surveillance webinars at: http://www.brookings.edu/health/projects/surveillance/roundtables.aspx