AP LATIN 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES

Similar documents
Biological Models of Anxiety

Reading DesCartes: Reading Comprehension (Informational) Skills: Constructing Meaning

A-2050 Ethics Analysis Essay. Squadron Officer School

St. Petersburg College Applied Ethics Program Critical Thinking & Application Paper Fall Session 2010

Topic #2. A key criterion in evaluating any test, measure, or piece of research is validity.

CCSS. RI. 2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.

ASMI COMPLAINTS PANEL FINAL DETERMINATION Meeting held May 11, 2010

The validity of inferences about the correlation (covariation) between treatment and outcome.

AP WORLD HISTORY 2015 SCORING GUIDELINES

CFSD 21 st Century Learning Rubric Skill: Critical & Creative Thinking

Writing Reaction Papers Using the QuALMRI Framework

FSA Training Papers Grade 4 Exemplars. Rationales

Holt McDougal Avancemos!, Level correlated to the. Crosswalk Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages

Holt McDougal Avancemos!, Level correlated to the. Crosswalk Alignment of the National Standards for Learning Languages

AP Psychology. Sample Student Responses and Scoring Commentary. Inside: Free Response Question 1. Scoring Guideline.

Communication Assessment

CT Rubric V.2 ACCEPTABLE (3)

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Exam Sec. I A The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web:

Critical Thinking Rubric. 1. The student will demonstrate the ability to interpret information. Apprentice Level 5 6. graphics, questions, etc.

UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS

Competency Rubric Bank for the Sciences (CRBS)

CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE

Answer Key Grade 4. Practice Test. Pirate Ships and Flags

January 2, Overview

Practitioner s Guide To Stratified Random Sampling: Part 1

Chapter 02 Developing and Evaluating Theories of Behavior

Teaching the FCAT should not be a juggling act. Let us help you!!! USE THE NEWSPAPER TO TEACH FCAT STRATEGIES

Assignment 2: Sampling & Data Analysis COMBINED (Group or Individual Assignment Your Choice)

AP STATISTICS 2013 SCORING GUIDELINES

Persuasive Speech. Persuasive Speaking: Reasoning with Your Audience

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Avancemos!, Level correlated to the

AP STATISTICS 2009 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Nature and significance of the local problem

COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY. Spring 2004

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

6. A theory that has been substantially verified is sometimes called a a. law. b. model.

Author's response to reviews

AP EUROPEAN HISTORY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

AP STATISTICS 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B) Question 5

Tutorial. Understanding the Task. People don t often read editorials critically, believing the writer may know more about the subject than they do.

Examiners Report June GCE Psychology 6PS01 01

Psychology 205, Revelle, Fall 2014 Research Methods in Psychology Mid-Term. Name:

C/S/E/L :2008. On Analytical Rigor A Study of How Professional Intelligence Analysts Assess Rigor. innovations at the intersection of people,

Performance Indicator INFORMATION FLUENCY - CONNECT

3. Read the study by Grant. Underline psychology key words and add them to your glossary. 4. Make detailed notes on the study

The Research Process: Coming to Terms

Opening Wedge Osteotomy

LAPORAN AKHIR PROJEK PENYELIDIKAN TAHUN AKHIR (PENILAI) FINAL REPORT OF FINAL YEAR PROJECT (EXAMINER)

Progress Monitoring Handouts 1

Tips For Writing Referee Reports. Lance Cooper

Math Kindergarten. 4 - Excelling 3 - Meeting 2 - Approaching 1 - Working Below Consistently uses precise mathematical language

Psychology 2015 Scoring Guidelines

Preptests 60 Answers and Explanations (By Ivy Global) Section 1 Logical Reasoning

PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT PROFICIENCY: REPORT REVIEW FORM

IAASB Main Agenda (February 2007) Page Agenda Item PROPOSED INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON AUDITING 530 (REDRAFTED)

The effect of metacomprehension judgment task on comprehension monitoring and metacognitive accuracy

DRAFT (Final) Concept Paper On choosing appropriate estimands and defining sensitivity analyses in confirmatory clinical trials

Answer to Anonymous Referee #1: Summary comments

Integrative Thinking Rubric

New York State Regents Examination in English Language Arts (Common Core)

Tintin and the Exploded Confetti Plant: Big One or Big Bang?

LSAT PrepTest 29 (October 1999) Explanations by Steven Blatt. last revised: 1 Aug Table of Contents

1. Injectable micronutrients are not affected by stomach, or intestinal absorption problems

HOW TO IDENTIFY A RESEARCH QUESTION? How to Extract a Question from a Topic that Interests You?

Chapter 4 Research Methodology

Elaboration for p. 20:

Work No. Rater Initials Average Score

Science and Engineering Practice (SEP) Rubric

WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT 1 (8%)

AP SEMINAR 2016 SCORING GUIDELINES

We Can Test the Experience Machine. Response to Basil SMITH Can We Test the Experience Machine? Ethical Perspectives 18 (2011):

multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology

Do not copy, post, or distribute

Involving people with autism: a guide for public authorities

Unit 2, Lesson 5: Teacher s Edition 1. Unit 2: Lesson 5 Understanding Vaccine Safety

Author's response to reviews

FSA Training Papers Grade 7 Exemplars. Rationales

The Scientific Method

Culminating Assessments. Option A Individual Essay. Option B Group Research Proposal Presentation

Examiners Report June GCE Psychology 8PS0 02

Admission Test Example. Bachelor in Law + Bachelor in Global Governance - BIG

Skills (Students will do): Determine word meanings Use context clues Acknowledge the need to stop and look for context clues.

Guide to Rating Critical & Integrative Thinking for eportfolios Washington State University, Fall 2006

Critical Thinking Assessment at MCC. How are we doing?

PSY The Psychology Major: Academic and Professional Issues. Module 8: Critical Thinking. Study Guide Notes

Assessment Plan for Psychology Programs (B.A. & B.S.)

Observation and Assessment. Narratives

Confidence in Causal Inferences: The Case of Devaluation

International Standard on Auditing (UK) 530

UNIT 4 ALGEBRA II TEMPLATE CREATED BY REGION 1 ESA UNIT 4

Title:The self-reported health of U.S. flight attendants compared to the general population

Name : Assigned: 11/4 Due: 11/12. Document Based Question: The Effects of Industrialization RESOURCE PACKET. Resource: page # I.

Enhancing Your Conflict Competence. Vanderbilt University Osher Life Long Learning Course, Spring, 2015

The Drummer Boy of Shiloh Close Reading Driving Question

Research Design Overview. Heather M. Gray, Ph.D. January 26, 2010 Research Methods for the Social Sciences: An Introductory Course

Long Essay Question. Å The role of women changed in the late 20th. Å Though the perceived role of women remained

Importance of Good Measurement

Critical Appraisal of Scientific Literature. André Valdez, PhD Stanford Health Care Stanford University School of Medicine

Last Updated October 2016 Page 1

Transcription:

AP LATIN 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 5 Strong 4 Good 3 Average Development of Argument/Analysis develops a strong analysis of how Caesar s accounts of these two battles reveal his judgments about the soldiers actions and consistently aligns it to Latin evidence. Occasional errors need not weaken the overall impression of the essay. develops a good analysis of how Caesar s accounts of these two battles reveal his judgments about the soldiers actions, providing main ideas and some supporting details. Although the analysis may not be nuanced, it is based on a sound understanding of the Latin. develops an analysis of how Caesar s accounts of these two battles reveal his judgments about the soldiers actions that reflects some understanding of the passage; it may be strong for one passage but weak for the other. The analysis may not be well-developed, relying on main ideas but few supporting details, or it may rely on summary more than on analysis. Use of Latin uses copious examples of accurate, specific, and relevant Latin, properly cited, drawn from throughout both passages. uses examples of Latin that are generally accurate, specific, and relevant, properly cited; while they are not plentiful, they are drawn from throughout both passages. has few accurate Latin citations; they may not be linked to the analysis, or fail to support it. Inferences & Conclusions consistently uses inferences and draws conclusions that accurately reflect the Latin and support the analysis. uses some inferences and draws some conclusions that accurately reflect the Latin and support the analysis. The student may rely on what is stated, or may make inaccurate inferences. displays only limited understanding of implied information. Contextual Knowledge is able to use specific contextual references consistently in order to support the analysis. is able to use some specific contextual references that support the analysis. misunderstands contextual references or fails to connect them effectively to the analysis. 2014 The College Board.

AP LATIN 2014 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 3 (continued) 2 Weak 1 Poor 0 Unacceptable --- recognizes passage(s), but presents only a weak analysis. It may be confusing and lack organization, or may rely on summary. It addresses only portions of the passages, or addresses one passage well, but the other not at all. understands the question but offers no meaningful analysis. Although the student may not recognize the passages, the response contains some correct, relevant information. offers a response that is totally irrelevant, totally incorrect, or restates the question. provides little Latin support, taken out of context or misunderstood; or may use no Latin. cites no Latin, or only individual Latin words, and exhibits either no understanding of the Latin in context, or a complete misunderstanding. demonstrates no understanding of Latin in context. makes incorrect assumptions or makes inferences and conclusions based on the passages only rarely. does not make inferences and conclusions based on the passages. does not make inferences and conclusions based on the passages. shows no understanding or a thorough misunderstanding of context; references to context, if any, are irrelevant. shows no understanding or a thorough misunderstanding of context and provides no meaningful discussion of context or contextual references. shows no understanding or a thorough misunderstanding of context and provides no meaningful discussion of context or contextual references. Blank page Blank page Blank page Blank page Blank page 2014 The College Board.