PENNDOT e-notification

Similar documents
SUMMARY OF NOVEMBER 2013 REVISIONS - VERSION

SUMMARY OF NOVEMBER 2018 REVISIONS - VERSION

Four simply supported steel plate girders (appear to be an old railcar).

Three Bridges at I-64/Mercury Boulevard Interchange in Hampton, VA

2011 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

Executive Summary RPT-GEN November 28. Bridge No Quartz Creek Bridge Inspection Report

Integral Abutment Bridge Design with Soil Structure Interaction

EXAMINATION OF THE RESPONSE OF SKEWED STEEL BRIDGE SUPERSTRUCTURE DURING DECK PLACEMENT

ACCELERATED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT: THE REPLACEMENT OF MD 362 OVER MONIE CREEK

The application can be accessed from the pull down menu by selecting ODOT > Drafting Apps > Signs, or by the following key-in command:

SEPTEMBER, 2006 ROAD DESIGN MANUAL 7-0(1) CHAPTER 7 PAVEMENT DESIGN

ABC OF BRIDGE NO. 465 I-195 Ramp (Dr-2) Over Warren Avenue

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO th STREET OVER THE ZUMBRO RIVER CITY OF ROCHESTER

Rebuilding and widening the 54- year-old Jane Addams Memorial Tollway into a state-of-the-art corridor linking Rockford to Elgin (three lanes) and

Semi-Integral Abutment Bridges

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 4 OVER THE CLEARWATER RIVER (DAM) DISTRICT 2 - CLEARWATER COUNTY

CHAPTER 5 MODELING OF THE BRIDGE

OVER US 6 LATERAL BRIDGE SLIDE: I-75

Questions and Answers on VDOT's Supplement to the AASHTO Manual for Bridge Element Inspection

Shifting the Canning Bus Bridge Sideways

Potential For Fracture To Occur In Iowa DOT Steel Girder Bridges Due to Triaxial Constraint

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH 24 OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Pennsylvania s Experience with LRFD Implementation. By: Thomas Macioce, P.E. Beverly Miller, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

Technology. Reinforced Earth Wall Typical Section. Traffic Barrier. Roadway. Select Granular Material. Facing Panel Random Backfill.

Conditional assessment of Kiri Bridge in Shkoder, Albania

v Feature Stamping SMS 13.0 Tutorial Prerequisites Requirements Map Module Mesh Module Scatter Module Time minutes

EFFECTS OF SKEWED ABUTMENTS ON CURVED BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION RESPONSE. Tyler Goodman. Spring 2013

Ahmed Mongi, M.S., P.E. Engineering Division

IBRIDGE 1.0 USER MANUAL

STATE ROUTE 30 OVER BESSEMER AVE. SUPERSTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT IN 57 HOURS

Update on Seismic Behavior and Design of

IL 115 OVER GAR CREEK ACCELERATED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT. Chad Hodel, S.E., P.E. (WHKS) Stan Kaderbek, S.E., P.E. (Milhouse)

v Feature Stamping SMS 12.0 Tutorial Prerequisites Requirements TABS model Map Module Mesh Module Scatter Module Time minutes

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CSAH NO. 6 OVER A BRANCH OF THE CALDWELL CREEK DISTRICT 1 - KOOCHICHING COUNTY

Feature Stamping SURFACE WATER MODELING SYSTEM. 1 Introduction. 2 Opening a Background Image

Low-Volume Road Abutment Design Standards

Keywords: integral abutment bridge, pile head abutment connection, finite element method.

1 Exam Prep. SMACNA Architectural Sheet Metal Questions

Comparative Study of Behaviour of Integral and Bearing Type Bridge under Temperature Loading

Figure 3: Analytic procedure

research report Field Measurements on Skewed Semi-Integral Bridge With Elastic Inclusion: Instrumentation Report

Design of Dingley Bypass Integral Bridges

Appendix C Guidelines for Design of Integral Abutments March 3, 2003

Integral bridges and environmental conditions

EFFECTS OF SPATIAL VARIATION OF SEISMIC INPUTS ON BRIDGE LONGITUDINAL RESPONSE

UNDERWATER BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO CRANE LAKE ROAD OVER HAWKINSON CREEK ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Available for CEREC SW, inlab CAD SW, 3Shape, Dental Wings, DWOS Lava Edition, exocad, Open design software. Atlantis. Atlantis Core File.

Appendix B. Shallow Foundations Report

DATA GATHERING AND DESIGN DETAILS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

APPENDIX A INTEGRAL ABUTMENTS

Optimum Body and Leg Extension Selection in PLS CADD

A Tale of Two Bridges: Comparison between the Seismic Performance of Flexible and Rigid Abutments

AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON BEHAVIOR OF RC PARAPET WALL OF ABUTMENT UNDER COLLISION

STUDY OF THE REASONS THAT INDUCE CRACKS AT BRIDGE DECK END

State-Aid Bridge News August 2, 2005

Webinar Q&A Documentation Slide In Bridge Construction (SIBC) Construction/Contractor Perspective March 6, 2014

5 DAMAGE TO TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES

Parallel-Axis Gear Terminology

Introduction. Substructure Inspection and Rating. Introduction. Introduction 28/03/2017

Effect of Pile Orientation in Skewed Integral Abutment Bridges

R-Group Finland Oy. RLS Lifting Sockets Technical Manual According to Eurocodes, EU Machinery directive 2006/42/EC and VDI/BV-BS 6205 CE Approved

Reducing Bridge Damage Caused by Pavement Forces Part 1: Some Examples

6. Gear Measurement And Testing

ABSCOUR 9 USERS MANUAL

OPNAVINST G 30 Dec 05

Analyses of State Highway Bridges Damaged in the Darfield and Christchurch Earthquakes

NC DOUBLE OPPOSING HEAD DRILL

Modified Sheet Pile Abutment for Low-Volume Road Bridge

BEHAVIOR AND ANALYSIS OF AN INTEGRAL ABUTMENT BRIDGE

Fort Goff Creek Bridge R04 ABC Project. Dorie Mellon, PE Structure Policy & Innovation Division of Engineering Services Caltrans May 20, 2015

Emergency Bridge Stabilization at Mile Watrous Subdivision

4766 Research Dr. San Antonio, TX insightdentalsystems.com

The Structure upon which the ends of a Bridge rests is referred to as an Abutment

Earthquake Resistance of Bridges With Friction Slab Abutments

Unit 1: Introduction to the Operating System, Computer Systems, and Networks 1.1 Define terminology Prepare a list of terms with definitions

User Manual. RaySafe i2 dose viewer

Nondestructive Testing Procedure: Liquid Penetrant Testing

300 GEORGE ST REDEVELOPMENT IMPACT OF PROPOSED BASEMENT EXCAVATION ON THE ANN STREET ONRAMP STRUCTURES

MSBRIDGE: OPENSEES PUSHOVER AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF MULTI-SPAN BRIDGES - USER MANUAL

Detailed Seismic Assessment and Seismic Improvements of Market Road Underpass

DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF BR1449 VICTORIA PARK DRIVE MODIFICATIONS, BURSWOOD, WA

Bahavior and Analysis of an Integral Abutment Bridge

ITHA-BRIDGE SOFTWARE FOR INEASTIC TIME HISTORY ANALYSYS OF BRIDGES PRE-PROCESSOR AND POST-PROCESOR OF OPENSEES

Development of Abutment Design Standards for Local Bridge Designs Volume 1 of 3

Table of Contents Section 6 Table of Contents

Quick guide for 3shape order form

ASD and LRFD of Reinforced SRW with the use of software Program MSEW(3.0)

Design of Picton Railway Overbridge for Mine Subsidence

Charts Worksheet using Excel Obesity Can a New Drug Help?

B. Stipulated Price (Lump Sum). If Contract is Stipulated Price Contract, payment for Work in this Section is included in total Stipulated Price.

ECDC HIV Modelling Tool User Manual

Bands and Attachments

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION NORTHERN VIRGINIA DISTRICT

Critically damaged bridges & concepts for earthquake recovery

User Manual Verizon Wireless. All Rights Reserved. verizonwireless.com OM2260VW

Thermal Response of Integral Abutment Bridges With Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls

PreTect Software Documentation

Transcription:

PENNDOT e-notification Bureau of Design Engineering Computing Management Division BRADD No. 027 August 30, 2010 Release of Version 3.1.5.0 PennDOT's Bridge Automated Design and Drafting Software (BRADD) has been revised as described in the attached Summary of August 2010 Revisions - Version 3.1.5.0. This version of BRADD will automatically be distributed as a free update to all existing licensees of the BRADD Software. Please direct any questions to: Jay M. Fitzgerald, P.E., SECB BRADD Manager PA Department of Transportation Bureau of Design Engineering Computing Management Division 400 North Street 7 th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17120-0094 Phone: 717.787.7057 Fax: 717.783.8217 E-mail: jafitzgera@state.pa.us Archived copies of all previously distributed e-notifications can be obtained from the PENNDOT BRADD website at http://bradd.engrprograms.com/home and clicking on "e-notification" and then "Mailing List Archives." Bureau of Design - ECMD 400 North Street - 7th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17120-0094 717.787.7057 1 of 1

SUMMARY OF AUGUST 2010 REVISIONS - VERSION 3.1.5.0 Since the release of BRADD Version 3.1.4.1, several problem reports and user perfective maintenance requests have been received. This release of BRADD Version 3.1.5.0 contains the following revisions: 1. Metric units are no longer a valid option and have been removed from the BRADD software and documentation. BRADD jobs with SI (Metric) units will no longer be displayed; the option to create a new BRADD job with metric units has been disabled; BRADD metric unit jobs cannot be imported. (VI 3675 and VI 3676) 2. Type 5 approach slabs were added according to BD-628M (July, 2007), Sheet 35 of 35 for integral abutments. Sleeper slabs were added according to Details 16 and 18 in BD-628M (July, 2007), Sheet 27 of 35 for integral abutments. (VI 3660 through VI 3668). 3. The PA Bulb-Tee beam shape was added as a prestressed I-Beam option. (VI 2895) 4. Version 2.3.0.0 of PENNDOT PSLRFD was incorporated into BRADD. (VI 3596) 5. Version 1.8.0.0 of PENNDOT ABLRFD was incorporated into BRADD. (VI 3597) 6. BRADD now supports Windows Vista and Windows 7 operating systems, in addition to Windows XP. (vi:3563) 7. The STRUCTURE PLAN AT THE END OF BEAM detail was updated in accordance to changes made in BD-653M (July, 2007). BRADD was modified to use the 4 1/2" clearance from the bottom flange to the abutment R.F. to prevent clipping of the flange for P/S I-Beams with abutments without a backwall. (VI 3647) 8. A superstructure menu item, "Is Vertical Clearance Less Than 16'-0"", was added to the BRADD input system for P/S I-Beams. The intermediate diaphragms and intermediate diaphragm reinforcement are modified if this option is set to "Yes" in accordance to changes made in BD-655M Sheet 1, via PennDOT e-notification No.27 (December, 2008) (VI 3691) 9. Various end of slab/diaphragm details were updated in accordance to changes made in BD- 656M (July, 2007) (VI 3648) 10. The minimum distance from the beam void to the end of beam and various beam end details were updated for P/S Box Beams in accordance to changes made in BD-661M (July, 2007) (VI 3649) Page 1 of 6

11. The BEAM DAP detail for both P/S Box Beams and P/S I-Beams was updated in accordance to changes made in BD-661M (July, 2007) (VI 3650) 12. The quantities detail was updated in accordance to changes made in BC-751M (December, 2008) (VI 3692) 13. The weld labels were modified in the SOLE PLATE and FIXED/EXPANSION BEARING section details in accordance to changes made in BC-755M (December, 2008) (VI 3693) 14. Notes and dimensions were added to the TYPICAL SECTION AT ABUTMENT detail in accordance to changes made in BC-767M (July, 2007) (VI 3651) 15. Beam notch dimensions for box beams were updated in accordance to changes made in BC- 775M (July, 2007) (VI 3653) 16. The PLAN view was updated to show cheekwall bumpouts for adjacent box beams with U- wing abutments. (VI 2095) 17. A barrier reinforcement label was added on the Slab Section of integral abutment superstructures. (VI 3562) 18. A beam dapping note was removed from BEAM FABRICATION DETAILS 1 for integral abutment superstructures. (VI 3618) 19. A label was added for reinforcement bar from deck into end diaphragm in TRANSVERSE SLAB REINFORCEMENT PARALLEL TO ABUTMENT section for integral abutments superstructures. (VI 3621) 20. The Intermediate diaphragm detail on the FRAMING PLAN 2 sheet for integral abutment steel girder superstructures was moved to prevent overlapping with the end diaphragm detail. (VI 3634) 21. The log file overhang warning message for integral abutment superstructures was clarified and additional relevant information added. (VI 3671) 22. For integral abutments superstructures, the count/spacing of S3 bars was adjusted (see Section 3.5.1.11). A designer note is now placed when insufficient overhang distance causes S3 bars spacing to become impractical. (VI 3674) 23. The following changes were made to SLAB REINFORCING PLAN, SLAB CORNER EXTENSION, SLAB SECTION for structures with integral abutments: (VI 3695) Page 2 of 6

Changed the paving notch width on the SLAB REINFORCING PLAN and SLAB CORNER EXTENSION details to match the actual width. Corrected the number and spacing called for the longitudinal reinforcement at overhang. Moved the longitudinal flange reinforcement away from girder centerline. Added the bottom longitudinal bars at the end of the top flanges. Corrected improperly drawn S7 reinforcement. 24. Fixed the intermediate diaphragm and end diaphragm plan views to show the connecting plate for plate girder superstructures or no connecting plate for rolled beam superstructures. The intermediate diaphragm plan was aligned so that CL beams for intermediate and end diaphragms are coincident lines. Moved Note A from Framing Plan 1 to Framing Plan 2 sheet. (VI 3550) 25. The procedure for dapping was modified to improve the process of designing a successful dap. The dapping procedure enumerated in Section 3.2.7.6 of the BRADD User Manual has been revised accordingly. (VI 3627, VI 3492) 26. An 'Invalid Dap Design' error (displayed in the superstructure design controller log file) now results in a design failure. Previously, this error would have resulted in a successful design. (VI 3641) 27. Ensured that DAP DEPTH WARNING messages are not potentially displayed in the superstructure controller design output file for prestressed beam superstructures on integral abutments. (VI 3672) 28. Transverse deck reinforcement bars were fanned at the acute corners for bridges with spread superstructures and skews less than 75 degrees. Previously the transverse reinforcement would extend to the deck corners with bars possibly too short to properly support the deck. (VI 2624) 29. Deck corners on the SLAB REINFORCING PLAN, BARRIER PLAN, and BARRIER DETAILs were updated to match the dimensions shown in the ACUTE SLAB CORNER CUTOFF detail. (VI 2625) 30. SLAB PLAN, BARRIER AND SLAB, LEFT and RIGHT BARRIER, and FRAMING PLAN details were modified to match abutment corners. (VI 2711) Page 3 of 6

31. The BRADD Users Manual was updated to document that the end diaphragm located in the slab overhang region is included in the dead load calculations of end diaphragm weight for prestressed I-beam, spread box beam and steel beam superstructures. The calculations in BRADD were revised to include this change for steel beams on abutments without backwalls. The calculations were already being made for prestressed superstructures, so no program revisions to the prestressed portion of the program were required. (VI 2898) 32. For rolled beam superstructures only, a camber note was added to the Camber table when the total camber is less than the AISC tolerance. (VI 3141) 33. For new BRADD jobs, the footing top and bottom parallel covers were changed from 4.0 and 3.0 to both using the DEFAULT cover. For pile footing design runs, the parallel cover was set equal to the sum of the Maximum Diameter of Footing Bars setting and the perpendicular cover. (VI 3391) 34. Reinforcement labeling was added to SECTION C-C and offset in the detail to more easily distinguish different sets of abutment reinforcement. (VI 3414) 35. A table was added displaying finished deck grade elevations over the centerline of each girder at every tenth point starting from the centerline of bearing at abutment 1 to the centerline of bearing at abutment 2. (VI 3463) 36. BRADD was verified to work correctly with Bentley PowerDraft V8i (SELECTSeries 1) and MicroStation V8i (SELECTSeries 1) (version 08.11.07.xx). A problem with 08.11.05.xx versions of Bentley products prevents BRADD from creating design files correctly when running with those versions. (VI 3494) 37. A Reinforcement label in the rear face of the abutment stem section detail was moved to point to the correct reinforcement bar. (VI 3517) 38. A column, LEVEL OVERHANG EDGE THICKNESS, was added to the Edge of Thickness and Elevation output table to display the edge of deck thickness based on the Section 3.2.8 calculations below. This is in addition to the existing column now called SLOPED OVERHANG EDGE THICKNESS displaying the deck thickness calculations based on Section 3.2.9. (VI 3526) 39. A graphical image representing deck cross section(s) was added to the Cross Section menu. The added image shows current horizontal dimensions and slopes for the normal crown station and full superelevation station, if the bridge is superelevated. (VI 3527) Page 4 of 6

40. A correction was made to the calculated number of longitudinal bars called out in the overhang of the SLAB SECTION detail. (VI 3542) 41. A correction was made to the calculation of the horizontal blockout dimension at the ends of the deck for steel superstructures and the TYPICAL SECTION AT ABUTMENTS 1 & 2 detail was updated to show the correct blockout dimension. (VI 3545) 42. A correction was made for the horizontal abutment reinforcement. In cases of wide abutments, laps were omitted and reinforcement lengths were exceeding the maximum length of reinforcement according to DM-4 Section 5.4.3.4P. The laps are now displayed as needed and checks for maximum reinforcement lengths have been added. (VI 3624) 43. When clicking the Generate drawings button a new window was added to BRADD to display the list of files that will be deleted if previous drawings exist. (VI 3637) 44. A problem was corrected with reinforcement that was being drawn outside of the concrete outlines on the TYPICAL BARRIER PLAN. (VI 3638) 45. BRADD was displaying an erroneous input warning for wingwall 1 when the wingwall 2 length exceeded 7'-8" for integral abutment superstructures with beams whose depths were less than 5'-6". BRADD was modified to display the warning only when wingwall 1 length exceeds the maximum limit as specified in the Wingwall Length input menus. (VI 3639) 46. BRADD prevented the user from accepting the Abutment Rock Criteria menu for a new job if the Sliding Phi Factor option was disabled (not defined). The menu was fixed so that the menu now can be accepted whether or not the option is disabled. (VI 3643) 47. The warning displayed in the Adjacent Box Beam Superstructure controller log file when the bearing seat width is greater than the beam spacing was enhanced to show both values used in the comparison. The bearing seat width used previously was computed along the skew and rounded up to the nearest inch. The bearing seat width calculation was changed to round to the nearest quarter inch. (VI 3644) 48. A problem preventing a successful design for adjacent box beam superstructures with transverse beam slopes was fixed. The problem would cause the deck thickness to oscillate back and forth indefinitely, eventually causing the superstructure design to fail. (VI 3646) 49. BRADD was corrected to eliminate a crash when trying to import files containing unexpected characters. The BRADD Import function was changed to ignore imported files that are not part of a typical BRADD project. (VI 3669) Page 5 of 6

50. Removed Type of Footing, Type of Wingwalls, Automatic Wingwall Geometry, and Abutment Staged Construction from Job description display for jobs with integral abutments. (VI 3670) 51. The calculation of the W.P. coordinates at the end of the U-wing for when the 10 degree flare back occurs was fixed, now taking into account the difference between the end of the footing and the end of the wingwall flared back. The 1/2" flush expansion joint dimension was corrected in the WINGWALL PLAN. (VI 3702) 52. Corrected the criteria BRADD used to determine whether to display the OVERHANG WARNING message in the Superstructure Controller Design output file for spread box girders superstructures. The warning message also was revised to provide more explicit information. (VI 3694) 53. The calculation of the W.P. coordinates and the W.P. stations & offsets at the ends of U- wings for curved geometry that is input as a negative radius (curve origin located to the left of the roadway, looking ahead stations) has been corrected. The W.P. offsets for curved geometry that is input as a negative radius have been corrected so that negative offsets are to the left of the C.L. Roadway, looking ahead stations. (VI 3872) Page 6 of 6