previously funded for years Determining the status of twospotted spider mite acaricide resistance in southeast strawberries Abstract

Similar documents
Mite Management Strategy and Miticide Resistance

Options for Managing Mites and Weevils

INTEGRATING PESTICIDES AND BIOCONTROL OF MITES

Managing Spider Mites in Almonds. David Haviland Entomology Farm Advisor UC Cooperative Extension, Kern Co.

Powdery mildew and arthropod pest management in strawberries

Mites and Miticide Resistance

COMPARATIVE TOXICITY OF PESTICIDES TO THE SIXSPOTTED MITE EOTETRANYCHUS SEXMACULATUS (RILEY) (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE) ON AVOCADOS

Chemical, Botanical, and Microbial Solutions for Managing Spider Mites

Lewis Mite, Thrips and Lygus Research Update

Neoseiulus californicus McGregor: A Predatory Mite Species for Controlling Twospotted Spider Mites in Strawberries 1

Bio-efficacy of Clofentezine 50SC against two spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on rose cv. First Red in polyhouse

Insect Management in Blueberries

CONTROL OF SPIDER MITES IN APPLE AND TART CHERRY WITH ACARICIDES. Diane G. Alston Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT

WASHINGTON STATE U NIVERSITY World Class. Face to Face. Pear psylla and mite management. New choices for 2004

Control of broad mite, whitefly and spider mites in open field pepper and eggplant with predaceous mites (Phytoseiidae)

New Insecticide Options for Integrated Pest Management: Keith Granger, Jay Brunner, John Dunley and Mike Doerr

Imidacloprid Boosts TSSM Egg Production

EFFICACY OF NEW PESTICIDES AGAINST SIXSPOTTED MITE EOTETRANYCHUS SEXMACULATUS (RILEY) (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE) ON AVOCADOS

Tawfiq M. Al-Antary, Mohammad R. Al-lala and Marwan I. Abdelwali ABSTRACT DAR Publishers/ The University of Jordan.

Efficiency of Three Predatory Phytoseiid Mites and Biocide Chemical for Controlling Tetranychus urticae Koch on eggplant at Beheira Governorate

PLUM CURCULIO: MANAGEMENT ASSUMPTIONS

Efficacy of Selected Acaricides on Spider Mites in Corn 2011

1. Plant Prot. Res Institute, A.R.C, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. 2. Fac. Agric. Al-Azhar Univ., Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt

Selectivity of Three Miticides to Spider Mite Predator, Phytoseius plumifer (Acari: Phytoseiidae) Under Laboratory Conditions

Advances in Environmental Biology

NSave Nature to Survive

New Insecticides and Miticides for Apple and Pear IPM

New York Greengrass Association / Turfgrass Environmental Stewardship Fund

Project title: Control of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) on protected cherry using the predatory mite Amblyseius andersoni

Seasonal Incidence and Management of Red Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. Infesting Rose

Cyhexatin and Propargite Resistance in Populations of Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) from California Almonds

Tree Fruit Pest & Insecticide Update. Celeste Welty January 2009

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF FOOD ON DEVELOPMENT AND FECUNDITY OF PREDACIOUS MITE NEOSEIULUS BELLINUS WOMERSLEY (ACARI: PHYTOSEIIDAE)

Importance of Good Spray Coverage. Diane Alston and Shawn Steffan Utah State University Northern Utah Fruit Growers Meeting February 8, 2006

Impact of Lygus lineolaris Management on Biodiversity in Cotton IPM

Population density and bio-control of phytophagous mites infesting grape yards with special reference to associated predacious mites

Chemical Control of Spotted Wing Drosophila in Berry Crops

Management Considerations: Squaring to First Flower

Biological control of twospotted spider mite on hops in Ohio. Thesis

The role of adaptation to host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation: negative evidence from Tetranychus urticae Koch

REQUIEM: A new product for control of thrips, whiteflies, mites and other sucking pests

university, Taif, KSA Giza Egypt

Evaluation of JH Biotech, Inc. Products under Egyptian environment

Int. J. Entomol. Res. 06 (01) 2018 In Press

SELECTIVE PESTICIDES AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL IN WALNUT PEST MANAGEMENT

Effect of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), on Marketable Yields of Field-Grown Strawberries in North-Central Florida

Vector Management. Michael E. Rogers UF / IFAS / Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred

Influence of abiotic factors on two spotted spider mite population in eggplant

Effect of Food and Temperature on The Biology of Typhlodrompis swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

D.A. RAWORTH AGRICULTURE CANADA RESEARCH STATION 6660 N. W. MARINE DRIVE VANCOUVER, B.C. CANADA V6T 1X2 ABSTRACT

San Jose Scale Management in North Carolina Peaches. Jim Walgenbach Dept. Entomology NC State University Mt Hort Crop Res & Ext Ctr Mills River, NC

2018 Peach Insect Management Update. Jim Walgenbach Dept Entomology & Plant Pathology MHCREC, Mills River, NC

Integrated Pest Management Successes

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

ARTHROPOD MANAGEMENT STUDIES ON FRUIT AND VEGETABLE CROPS IN WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA ANNUAL REPORT

Crops - Commercial. Cotton

Spotted wing drosophila in North Carolina 2013 Update

Crops - Commercial. Cotton

Apple Pest Management in the West: Strategies to Deal with Inevitable Change

AC303,630 A new novel insecticide-acaricide for control of resistant arthropod pests

The new. standard. oriental fruit moth and lightbrown apple moth. Frequently Asked Questions. for control of codling moth,

New pesticides for bugs in soybeans or Weighing up the buggy options

Population-level effects of abamectin, azadirachtin and fenpyroximate on the predatory mite Neoseiulus baraki

Codling moth (CM) is becoming an increasing problem

UNDERSTANDING INSECTICIDES AND HOW THEY WORK IN THE AGE OF SWD. Greg Loeb, Department of Entomology, NYSAES, Geneva, NY!

Insecticide Efficacy for Pecan Aphids. Larry Blackwell 1 Brad Lewis 1,2 Tiffany Johnson 1 1 New Mexico State University 2 New Mexico Dept.

Secondary Pests of Commercial Fruit Orchards

A SUPPLEMENT TO PEST CONTROL GUIDE

11/9/2016. University of Maine. University of Maine. Cooke Aquaculture. University of Maine and Pharmaceutical Industry.

Total effects of contact and residual exposure of bifenthrin and k-cyhalothrin on the predatory mite Galendromus occidentalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Enhancing Biological Control to Stabilize Western Orchard IPM Systems

Lethal, Sublethal, and Behavioral Effects of Sulfur-Containing Products in Bioassays of Three Species of Orchard Mites

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

Integrated Pest Management Successes

ONGOING PROJECT REPORT YEAR 1/3 WTFRC Project # CH

Cannabis Aphid (Phorodon cannabis)

Tree Fruit IPM Advisory: June 20 th, 2006

INSECTICIDE RESISTANCE MONITORING IN LEPIDOPTERAN COTTON PESTS

Osborne et al.: Ant Predation on Mites 565

Entomology: A Perspective on Insecticide Efficacy Research

Effects of azadirachtin on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and its compatibility with predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on strawberry

The efficacy of new insecticides and Dipel for Soybean Looper control in soybeans and effects on beneficial insects and arthropods.

Multiple natural enemies do not improve two spotted spider mite and flower western thrips control in strawberry tunnels

OCCURRENCE OF TWO-SPOTTED SPIDER MITE (TETRANYCHUS URTICAE KOCH) ON POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA CULTIVARS

BED. BUG supplement. trouble BREWING INSECTICIDES? Cimex lectularius (bed bug) by Gilles San Martin 72 /// JUNE 2013

REFERENCES. mite on okra.

Multiple acaricide resistance and underlying mechanisms in Tetranychus urticae on hops

Control of Codling Moth and Other Pear Arthropods with Novaluron Evaluation of Novaluron for Phytotoxicity to Pear and Apple 2004

Delivering the Proven Performance of Three Industry-leading Technologies

Scouting for Soybean Aphid

Abstract. Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae), a predatory mite

2017 Soybean Insect Control Recommendations

AP249 Biological control of apple powdery mildew. Shane Dullahide Queensland Department of Primary Industries

March 30, Re. CS: Hydrated lime, hydrogen peroxide, lime sulfur, horticultural oils, potassium bicarbonate, elemental sulfur.

Mass Multiplication of Two Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus Urticae on Pole Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)

Knockdown and Residual Control of Bagrada Bug With Foliar Insecticides in Broccoli: 2013 Efficacy Report

Control of the Two-Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch on Kidney Bean and Pea Plants

Seminar for greenhouse growers IPM strategy in ornamental potted plants

Influence of Irrigation Schedule on the Biological Parameters of TSSM T. urticae Koch. on Okra, Eggplant and Tomato

Pesticide Safety Insecticides Update 2006

Transcription:

Proposal Category: x Research Outreach Proposal Status: x New Proposal Previously funded by SRSFC; has been previously funded for years Determining the status of twospotted spider mite acaricide resistance in southeast strawberries Rebecca Schmidt-Jeffris 2700 Savannah Hwy Charleston, SC 29414 rschmi3@clemson.edu Hannah Burrack Box 7634, NCSU Raleigh, NC 27695 hannah burrack@ncsu.edu Abstract The purpose of this project was to determine the extent of acaricide resistance in twospotted spider mite (TSSM) populations from strawberry in North (NC) and South Carolina (SC). This was done by collecting populations of TSSM from strawberry fields, rearing the populations in colonies, and then applying acaricides to the mites in laboratory assays. For each population, we used a diagnostic dose of the high field rate divided by 5 (FD/5) to determine if resistance was likely for a particular active ingredient. Any populations with <50% mortality at FD/5 was further screened to determine the lethal dose that kills 50% of the population (LD50). This allowed us to compare LD50 s between the field-collected populations and a laboratory population that was known to be pesticide susceptible. Unfortunately, the rate of mortality in the water check was high the NC populations, so these assays will be repeated. In the SC populations, the pre-screen identified that all populations were likely to be resistant to bifenthrin (Brigade) and fenbutatin-oxide (Vendex). One population was also flagged for potential abamectin (Agri-Mek) resistance. The LD50 calculations determined that the tested populations were 100-60,000 less susceptible to bifenthrin and 25-123 less susceptible to fenbutatin-oxide than the laboratory population. The population tested for abamectin resistance was 25 less susceptible. In the case of bifenthrin and abamectin, the LD50 values were above or near field rate, indicating very likely application failure of these products. Fenbutatin-oxide field failure may also occur due to resistance. Growers should use and rotate between the newer acaricide products for which resistance has not yet been observed in strawberry to delay resistance development. Objectives: 1. Determine presence of acaricide resistance in twospotted spider mite populations from SC and NC strawberries using diagnostic doses 2. Determine the LD50 of any population determined to be resistant 3. Educate growers about resistance occurrence and management

Introduction Tetranychus urticae, commonly known as twospotted spider mite (TSSM), is an extremely polyphagous insect with a worldwide host range making them a serious pest of crops globally. TSSM are considered a pest because they pierce into plant cells and feed on the xylem, which causes leaf spotting and if the infestation because severe enough can result in leaf necrosis. In strawberry, this damage has been reported to cause 10-25% crop loss (Gimenez- Ferrer et al., 1994; Walsh et al., 1998). With warmer, drier years becoming increasingly common twospotted spider mite outbreaks continue to increase, which could result in greater crop damage. In strawberry, it is common for broad-spectrum insecticides to be applied to manage pests. The application of these insecticides causes the natural enemy population to decline, resulting in TSSM outbreaks. Once these outbreaks occur, apply acaricides to control TSSM. First, TSSM is intensively managed in both the nursery and fruit production phases of production, and for mites transferred from nursery to production fields, they are potentially exposed to acaricide residues for 10 to 12 continuous months. Frequent opportunities for resistance development are particularly problematic for TSSM, as this pest is notorious for rapid resistance development. Therefore, it is in the continued interest of growers to screen population to provide updated resistance information to improve management of systems. The goal of this study was to determine the current extent of TSSM resistance to acaricides registered in strawberry. Knowing the status of acaricide resistance will aid growers in decision making and allow for immediate improvements in management of TSSM. Seeing the magnitude of resistance in some populations may lead to increased adoption of chemical rotation and non-chemical management practices, including biological control. These studies will also serve as baseline resistance data, which can be used to track the development of resistance, especially to newer materials (e.g. Nealta). This baseline data is lacking for strawberries and many other crops in the southeast. Materials and Methods Colony Collection and Rearing. TSSM populations were collected from farms across the states of South Carolina and North Carolina (Table 1) and a susceptible population was obtained from Cornell University. The populations were then reared in isolated colonies on lima bean plants. Diagnostic Dose Bioassays. Plastic cups (96.1 ml) were used as arenas for all bioassays. Five replicates Table 1. Collection information for tested TSM populations. Population # City GPS Collection date SC-1 Lake City, SC 33.8717, -79.9097 31 Mar 2018 SC-2 Gable, SC 33.8763, -80.1327 31 Mar 2018 SC-3 Lexington, SC 33.9582, -81.3102 2 Apr 2018 SC-4 York, SC 35.0406, -81.2493 3 Apr 2018 SC-5 Fort Mill, SC 34.9798, -80.9605 3 Apr 2018 SC-6 Mt. Pleasant, SC 32.8544, -79.8227 19 Apr 2018 NC-1 Clinton, NC 35.0252,-78.2764 13 Jun 2018 NC-2 Carthage, NC 35.3550, -79.3454 25 May 2018 NC-3 Indian Trail, NC 35.0873, -80.5969 25 May 2018

per treatment were prepared. Within each replicate arena, a 0.5% solution of agar was poured in the cup and allowed to solidify. A bean leaf disk (2.2 cm) was placed lower surface facing upwards on this solution. For adulticides, 20 female TSSM were placed in the arena. The acaricide concentration used was based on the maximum label rate of the product for strawberry, applied at 100 GPA (935 L/ha) (Table 2). All acaricide solutions were created by mixing the appropriate amount of formulated product to make a 1 L solution. The arenas were sprayed with 2 ml of acaricide or water using a Potter Tower (Burkard Mfg, Rickmansworth, UK). Following application, arenas were held in a growth chamber at 27.29 ± 0.01 C, 75.0 ± 0.3% RH, 16:8 light and 16:8 photoperiod. The assays were evaluated at 24, 48, and 72 h following treatment to determine the number of live, dead, and runoff (drowned in agar) females. This was repeated for all field-collected colonies being screened. Data shown in results are for 24 h only. For ovicides, arenas were prepared in the same manner as previously mentioned and there were five replicates per treatment. Ten adult female TSSM were placed on each arena and held in a growth chamber overnight. The following day, adult female TSSM were removed and 20 eggs were marked in the arena, while all other eggs were removed. Following this, acaricides were applied as indicated above (Table 2). These assays were held until egg hatch in the check was >90%, at which point all treatments were evaluated to determine the number of hatched and unhatched eggs per arena. This was repeated for all field collected colonies that were screened. Dose Response Bioassays. If percent mortality or hatch was <50% for any diagnostic dose bioassay, an additional bioassay was conducted to determine the lethal dose for 50% (LD50) of the population for each acaricide and population tested. Each acaricide was tested using 6 serially diluted rates of product and a water control. These assays were set up as previously described, with five replicates per dose. Assays were evaluated in the same manner as diagnostic bioassays. This was also the only bioassay conducted for the susceptible population. Statistical Analysis. Mortality and hatch data from dose response bioassays were analyzed using POLO-Plus (LeOra Software, Parma, MO) to LD50 of the population for each acaricide and colony tested. A resistance ratio (RR) was calculated for each material and population by taking the field collected population LD50 divided by the susceptible population (RR= LD50 resistant/ld50 susceptible). Table 2. Acaricides used in resistance screening bioassays. Active Ingredient Classification Mode of Action Brand Name/Formulation FD/5 (g AI/ha) Bifenthrin Adulticide 3A Brigade WSB 44.83 Abamectin Adulticide 6 Agri-Mek SC 4.29 Bifenazate Adulticide 20D Acramite 50WS 45.36 Acequinocyl Adulticide 20B Kanemite 15 SC 67.86 Cyflumetofen Adulticide 25 Nealta 40.07 Fenpyroximate Adulticide 21A Portal XLO 9.07 Fenbutatin-oxide Adulticide 12B Vendex 50 WP 90.72 Spiromesifen Ovicide 23 Oberon 2 SC 56.04 Hexythiazox Ovicide 10A Savey 50DF 42.03 Etoxazole Ovicide 10B Zeal Miticide 30.26

Results and Discussion Diagnostic Dose Bioassays. Check mortality was much higher in the NC populations than the SC populations in both ovicide and adulticides bioassays (Table 3). Runoff was higher in these assays, so lids were added to the arenas. It is possible that the increased humidity within the arena was harmful to TSSM. Assays will be repeated for these populations this winter. Based on current results, populations NC-2 and NC-3 are likely to be resistant to bifenthrin and NC-3 is also likely to be resistant to fenbutatin-oxide (Table 3). Additional active ingredients may be flagged for screening after these assays are repeated. All SC populations were marked as potentially resistant to bifenthrin, with percent mortality ranging from 2-22% at FD/5 (Table 3). Similarly, all SC populations were flagged for dose response screening to fenbutatin-oxide. One population (SC-1) was borderline (53% mortality), but the standard error overlapped the <50% mortality criteria (Table 3). Finally, SC-2 was also marked as potentially resistant to abamectin, with FD/5 mortality at 32% (Table 3). Dose Response Bioassays. LC50 values were successfully determined for the susceptible population for all tested acaricides (Table 4). These values can be used in future screening efforts. LC50 values for each population active ingredient combination that was flagged in the diagnostic dose screening were able to be determined (Fig. 1). In the SC populations, bifenthrin resistance was ubiquitous and high (Fig. 1A). RRs varied from 116-59,956. In all but SC-6, the LC50 was above field rate, indicating a strong likelihood of failure of the application to control TSSM. While bifenthrin and other pyrethroids are typically applied for controlling other insect pests (e.g. strawberry clippers, aphids, tarnished plant bugs, and spotted wing drosophila), Brigade (bifenthrin) is labelled for TSSM control. Growers should be aware that this product is not likely to provide any level of TSSM control. Additionally, because pyrethroids have non-target effects on natural enemies (Gerson and Cohen, 1989; Theiling and Croft, 1988) and bifenthrin does not harm TSSM, application of this product for other pests is likely to cause TSSM flare ups. SC TSSM were 25-123 less susceptible to fenbutatin-oxide than the susceptible population. All LC50 values were below field rate, but high enough compared to field rate that application failure of the product is possible. This is an older acaricide and reports of field failure and resistance are common (Arthropod_Pesticide_Resistance_Database, 2018; Liburd et al., 2007; Urbaneja et al., 2008). The RR for abamectin in SC-2 TSSM was 25. This is above the field rate, indicating likely failure of this product to control this population. This is an older active ingredient and reports of TSSM resistance to abamectin are common (Arthropod_Pesticide_Resistance_Database, 2018). Because of the non-target effects of abamectin on the beneficial mites that control TSSM (Abraham et al., 2012; Bostanian and Akalach, 2006; Kim et al., 2005) and known resistance issues, this product should not be a first choice for strawberry growers. Extension efforts. To date, the results from these studies have been presented at one strawberry grower meeting in Lexington Co., SC on August 13, 2018; 12 growers attended this meeting. Additionally, spider mite resistance management was discussed at an additional seven extension meetings in South Carolina, with a total of ~300 attendees receiving the information. The myipm app strawberry mite management section has been updated to indicate that bifenthrin and fenbutatin-oxide resistance occurs in South Carolina. This information will continue to be used in future presentations.

Table 3. Percent mortality (mean ± SE) for all TSSM populations tested. Populations flagged for additional screening (<50% mortality) are highlighted in yellow, borderline cases where mortality overlapped with the cutoff when SE was accounted for are green. Active Ingredient SC-1 SC-2 SC-3 SC-4 SC-5 SC-6 NC-1 NC-2 NC-3 Bifenthrin 10 ± 3.5 22 ± 5.6 7 ± 2.5 7 ± 3.0 14 ± 4.3 2.0 ± 1.2 87.5 ± 4.0 39.4 ± 6.8 52.6 ± 7.7 Abamectin 100 ± 0 32 ± 7.2 61 ± 7.0 97 ± 2.0 100 ± 0 99 ± 1.0 98.0 ± 2.0 96.9 ± 1.2 78.0 ± 4.5 Fenbutatin-oxide 53 ± 8.7 18 ± 5.1 24 ± 5.1 21 ± 5.6 29 ± 13.2 2.0 ± 1.3 80.4 ± 6.3 61.7 ± 11.1 45.5 ± 5.7 Acequinocyl 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 98.9 ± 1.1 98.9 ± 1.1 64.1 ± 9.6 Bifenazate 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 95 ± 2.2 100 ± 0 99 ± 1.0 96.1 ± 1.8 87.3 ± 5.2 64.8 ± 7.2 Fenpyroximate 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 70.2 ± 13.0 Cyflumetofen 99 ± 1.0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 95 ± 3.9 95.3 ± 1.2 99.0 ± 1.0 72.4 ± 5.5 Check (Adulticide) 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 1 ± 1.0 31.2 ± 7.2 44.2 ± 7.1 62.1 ± 7.7 Etoxazole 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 99.0 ± 1.0 99.0 ± 1.0 100 ± 0 Spiromesifen 98 ± 2.0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 97 ± 2.0 90 ± 1.6 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 Hexythiazox 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 100 ± 0 98.8 ± 1.3 Check (Ovicide) 8 ± 2.6 4 ± 2.4 1 ± 1.0 1 ± 1 7 ± 2.5 4 ± 2.9 75.0 ± 4.7 37.0 ± 6.4 21.0 ± 5.1

Summary Results from this study indicate that bifenthrin and fenbutatin-oxide are unlikely to control TSSM in grower fields. All SC populations tested indicated some level of resistance to these products. In some cases, growers may also experience field failure of abamectin due to resistance. Fortunately, resistance to other active ingredients was not found. Strawberry growers should rotate use of newer acaricides to prevent resistance development. Many newer active ingredients, for which this study did not find resistance, have the added benefit of minimal nontarget effects on natural enemies. In particular, hexythiazox, cyflumetofen, bifenazate, and acequinocyl should be considered due to their selectivity. References Abraham, C.M., Braman, S.K., Oetting, R.D., Hinkle, N.C., 2012. Pesticide compatibility with natural enemies for pest management in greenhouse gerbera daisies. J. Econ. Entomol. 106, 1590-1601. Arthropod_Pesticide_Resistance_Database, 2018. Available online: https://www.pesticideresistance.org/. Bostanian, N.J., Akalach, M., 2006. The effect of indoxacarb and five other insecticides on Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae), Amblyseius fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and nymphs of Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag. Sci. 62, 334-339. Gerson, U., Cohen, E., 1989. Resurgences of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) induced by synthetic pyrethroids. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 6, 29-46. Gimenez-Ferrer, R.M., Erb, W.A., Bishop, B.L., Scheerens, J.C., 1994. Host-pest relationships between the twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and strawberry cultivars with differing levels of resistance. J. Econ. Entomol. 87, 168-175. Kim, S.S., Seo, S.G., Park, J.D., Kim, S.G., Kim, D.I., 2005. Effects of selected pesticides on the predatory mite Amblyseius cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 40, 107-114. Liburd, O.E., White, J.C., Rhodes, E.M., Browdy, A.A., 2007. The residual and direct effects of reduced-risk and conventional miticides on twospotted spider mites, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Fla. Entomol. 90, 249-257. Theiling, K.M., Croft, B.A., 1988. Pesticide side-effects on arthropod natural enemies: a database summary. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 21, 191-218. Urbaneja, A., Pascual-Ruiz, S., Pina, T., Abad-Moyano, R., Vanaclocha, P., Monton, H., Dembilio, O., Catanera, P., Jacas, J.A., 2008. Efficacy of five selected acaricides against Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) and their side effects on relevant natural enemies occurring in citrus orchards. Pest Manag. Sci. 64, 834-842. Walsh, D.B., Zalom, F.G., Shaw, D.V., 1998. Interaction of the twospotted spider mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) with yield of day-neutral strawberries in California. J. Econ. Entomol. 91, 678-685.

Table 4. Acaricide LD50 values for the susceptible laboratory TSSM colony (LD50 and 95% Confidence Interval, CI). 95% CI Active Ingredient LD50 (ppm) Lower Limit Upper Limit Bifenthrin 0.704 0.379 1.159 Abamectin 0.016 0.013 0.019 Fenbutatin-oxide 1.414 0.858 1.931 Acequinocyl 0.003 0.001 0.008 Bifenazate 1.604 1.29 1.885 Spiromesifen 0.302 0.193 0.44 Cyflumetofen 3.027 2.525 3.53 Fenpyroximate 0.014 0.007 0.026 Hexythiazox 0.002 0.001 0.006 Etoxazole 0.016 0.005 0.033

Fig. 1. LD50 values (± 95% CI) for all populations that underwent dose response bioassays for a) bifenthrin, b) fenbutatin-oxide, and c) abamectin. The dashed line represents PPM of active ingredient for the high field rate.